In Britain, some 14,000 people have filed claims for government compensation alleging that the COVID-19 vaccination caused heart attacks and strokes.
Payments of £120,000 have been made in 175 cases, or less than 2% of those who applied, while hundreds have been rejected by medical assessors who claim insufficient proof of the jab causing injury.
Payments have been given to applicants for a variety of ailments, such as heart attacks, strokes, hazardous blood clots, spinal cord inflammation, severe oedema of the vaccinated limb, and facial paralysis.
An astonishing 97 per cent of successful claims relate to the AstraZeneca vaccine with just a handful relating to damage caused by Pfizer or Moderna, according to Freedom of Information requests by The Telegraph.
Despite cautions, the government persisted in recommending the AstraZeneca injection. Even after roll-outs in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Sweden, and Latvia were terminated by March 2021.
Following three AstraZeneca jabs, 52-year-old Leona Sanders, the wife of British champion flat race rider Seb Sanders, was hospitalised.
Despite being told that the vaccine would not interfere with her rare autoimmune disorder granulomatosis – which causes inflammation of the blood vessels – her compensation request was denied.
Mr Sanders said: ‘The collapses all came just days after she had the vaccine but the medical assessor rejected the claim.
‘The medical notes said she had a history of back pain and multiple falls, but Leona never complained about back pain or had falls before the jab.
‘She was very active, always with the horses. She never sat down.
‘It’s flawed me. I don’t like being made to feel like I am a liar.’
Established in the United Kingdom in 1979, the Vaccination Damage Payment Scheme has received around 16,000 applications, the majority of which are now comprised of Covid-19 vaccination claims.
Over 5,500 of these Covid claims have been denied, and 519 more were discarded before a medical evaluation.
Out of the 1,000 individuals who requested a reconsideration of their case, just 12 got their ruling overturned.
People who did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine faced backlash from friends and family, were avoided by some, and were labelled as self-centred by others, yet here we are! Perhaps their decision to forego the vaccination was wise.
There are still issues for some persons who received the COVID-19 vaccine, but the big pharma companies are relying on the fact that many of the cases would be difficult to prove.
They released a medication in a year that ought to have taken at least five years to test. Nobody could tell me what was in my jabs either after I had both of them done.
Some people will tell you that you weren’t forced to have the jab, but you weren’t given a choice, especially if you worked for the NHS and lots of other places. Some shops wouldn’t even allow you in, and people were told that if they didn’t have the jab they would lose their jobs and their livelihoods.
How long was the testing phase for these injections? Not long! And it’s probably still in progress. We don’t even know if these vaccines were safe, but AstraZeneca was shielded from prosecution over unknown side effects, and even if you did get some form of compensation now, it would come from the taxpayer’s money, not the pharmaceutical company.
THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO 