In April, GPs Will Have To Offer Same-Day Appointments For ‘Urgent’ Health Problems

GPs will be made to offer patients same-day appointments for ‘urgent’ health needs from April under the terms of a new NHS contract.

The British Medical Association said the move would likely be presented as a ‘major win’ for patient access, but family doctors will be ‘left reeling’ at the requirement.

It comes as a concerning new survey reveals nearly half of the public (48 per cent) avoided or delayed contacting their GP about a health concern last year.

People cited problems contacting their local practice, opting to wait for the problem to go away and not expecting to be offered a suitable appointment as some of the primary reasons behind their decision.

But two in five respondents (42 per cent) think the general standard of care provided by the NHS declined in the last year, and only one in eight (12 per cent) believe it has improved.

Tim Gardner, assistant director of policy at the Health Foundation, which commissioned the survey, said: ‘Our findings signal that too often people are going without the care they need, which risks storing up health problems further down the line and placing more strain on an already stretched service.’

A report compiled by the think tank says that public confidence in the Government’s NHS policies ‘remains low’, with 54 per cent disagreeing that their government has the right policies for the NHS compared to just 15 per cent who agree.

It comes as the Government pledged to increase access to family doctors in England via a new GP contract, backed by a £485 million investment.

According to the contract, any patient who has an urgent need must be able to schedule a same-day GP visit.

A separate £300 million of existing money in the service will be ring-fenced to help recruit additional GPs or increase hours of current family doctors, the Department of Health and Social Care said.

Chris McCann, acting chief executive at Healthwatch England, said: ‘People consistently tell us that GP services are becoming harder to use and that simply getting through the door for care can be a challenge.

‘For example, we often hear from individuals who wait in long telephone queues for an appointment, only to be told that all slots have been taken for the day and that they must try again tomorrow.

‘Plans to recruit more doctors should make it easier for patients to get appointments and ensure urgent cases are handled more quickly.’

Additionally, the contract mandates that general practitioners (GPs) utilise a procedure whereby they consult hospital consultants before sending patients to them for specialised treatment.

I’ll believe this when it actually happens. Firstly, our concept of ‘urgent’ and their idea of ‘urgent’ are two totally different things, and secondly, don’t get your hopes up, at best it will be a telephone consultation.

I’m not sure how it’s going to work in some places where you can’t get an appointment because the doctors are down at the local hotel giving priority treatment to leeches who are coming over in small boats. In some areas, they can’t even get a police presence, but a call from one of these establishments, and they turn up blues and twos.

Then, if you do get through to your surgery, you have to get through the receptionist first after waiting in a queue, and then you’re told that they can only offer you a phone appointment. Receptionists should all be employed by Border Force because they let no one in!

The City Lawyer Wet Himself At A Party, Made Anti-Semitic Slurs, And Assaulted Women

A City lawyer has been suspended for reportedly groping coworkers, making racial statements, and getting so inebriated at work parties that he wet himself.

While a partner at SBP Law, Ryan Williams was accused of using a slur to characterise a Black person and making antisemitic remarks to Jewish coworkers.

At a party in an East Finchley pub, north London, in 2021, Williams is said to have told a Jewish colleague that ‘racism to Jews does not exist’, and said: ‘You’re all on top,’ the tribunal heard.

He was also accused of having repeatedly described his black opponent in a charity boxing match as a ‘tall, large n*‘, using the foul insult repeatedly, The Telegraph reports.

According to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which filed the lawsuit against Williams, his actions became increasingly unpredictable during the evening, culminating in him hurling pizza across the pub garden.

By the end of the night, he was described as ‘incredibly drunk,’ and an Uber driver reportedly refused to pick him up.

He was reportedly incapable of standing up and, in his state of intoxication, urinated on his clothes.

Williams allegedly made previous antisemitic remarks to a Jewish coworker while working on a case related to a Jewish security charity.

The colleague claimed Williams said there was only security outside synagogues because Jewish people have lots of money.

At a Christmas party at the Dorchester Hotel, two months after the pub-garden party, he was accused of telling the same Jewish coworker that they only got their job due to their faith, and that Jewish people think they are above everyone else.

He was also said to have referenced another colleague’s ‘big Jew hands’.

At a bar after the party, the tribunal heard that Williams slapped a female colleague on the inner thigh, before touching her and another colleague on the bottom.

The SRA examined the accusations and referred the matter to the tribunal, accusing Williams of breaching bullying, harassment and discrimination rules.

Williams repudiated the claims, but stepped down from his £125,000-a-year partnership role at SBP Law, and is now a partner at corporate London firm Healys LLP.

He was hauled before the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal, which found all the charges proved and suspended him. It is understood he has been banned for 12 months, with a full judgment yet to be released.

He shouldn’t worry, though; he will probably be offered a position with our government – he would fit in rather nicely there, particularly with all his attributes.

There are some truly reputable solicitors, and then comes along one like this man, whose conduct gives the profession a bad name.

The wisest course of action would have been to abstain from drinking, particularly during work parties, so you wouldn’t be held accountable for any inadvertent or deliberate wrongdoing. Although in this day and age, you can still be blamed even without the alcohol.

Unfortunately, alcohol always exposes a person’s actual nature.

My recommendation, just don’t go to work parties, they are awful things anyhow. Keep your work and social life completely separate because you can’t choose your work colleagues, but you can choose your friends.

These events might take place in impressive establishments, but on the night, this is where HR are most alert and ravenous, and one should never give them the pleasure. The problem is, this is what happens at work parties. Some fool gets overexcited because maybe their home life is boring, and work is their only form of social life.

Mandelson Was Arrested For Misconduct

As part of an inquiry into suspected misconduct in public service, Peter Mandelson was detained and placed under arrest at his residence in London.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed a 72-year-old man was arrested on Monday afternoon following searches at two properties in London and Wiltshire.

Detectives arrived at Mandelson’s Regent’s Park address at about 4.15 pm in two unmarked vehicles.

After spending almost half an hour inside, he was seen exiting the property and getting into a police car flanked by officers.

Scotland Yard said: ‘Officers have arrested a 72-year-old man on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

‘He was arrested at an address in Camden on Monday, 23 February and has been taken to a London police station for interview.

‘This follows search warrants at two addresses in the Wiltshire and Camden areas.’

Two weeks after police searched Mandelson’s residences, he was arrested.

He had been spotted at both addresses in recent days after keeping a low profile following the release of the second batch of Epstein files. 

The Epstein files have revealed Mandelson communicating lewd and off-the-cuff messages with the late child abuser, including joking about ‘well-hung young men’ when he was a Cabinet minister. 

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said that Mandelson’s arrest is ‘the defining moment of Keir Starmer’s premiership’.

She added: ‘It’s a matter of when (Starmer) goes, not if he goes. I asked him if he had full confidence in Peter Mandelson just a few months ago, and he said yes, despite all of these allegations being known, only to see the man arrested shows that the prime minister has terrible judgment.

‘He’s weak. He has not released the information around the (Mandelson) files, though he sacks the person who is supposed to be overseeing the release. I think that shows what kind of person the prime minister is.’

Earlier in February, police officers arrived outside Mandelson’s £7.6 million house near Regent’s Park – which the politician bought in 2011 following advice from Epstein.

The officers knocked on the door and entered the house, with one of them wearing what appeared to be a small body camera.

The officers were seen gathering things from their car, including a blue box and a large bag, before re-entering the property.

Days after Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested on accusations of misconduct in public office, Mandelson was also arrested.

Everyone who has anything to do with it will soon be singing like canaries. The dominoes are falling one by one, but how do we know if they’re rubbish arrests – smoke and mirrors to make it look like they’re giving a damn for the debauchery that went on? Two down, lots to come in the future – the inventory will be extremely long.

One card at a time – the house of illusions is falling, and they will ultimately get caught with their pants down.

But right now, they’re turning this Epstein story into a global sport. Mind you, it will probably be much better than the Olympics, but let’s face it, they’re all cabinet lickers, but what it actually boils down to is that millionaires and billionaires are paying people off to accept paedophilia.

There were evidently emails from Mandelson to Epstein in which they were discussing girls in a derogatory way. Mandelson will probably sing like a bird now in an attempt to secure himself a lower sentence. The can of worms has now been firmly opened, so expect more to follow.

Taxi Driver Dropping Off Merry Punters For Donations

The local council has prohibited a bar owner who gave patrons rides home in his black taxi from continuing to do so.

Paul Hartfield, who owns the Flying Horse in Smarden in Ashford, Kent, has raised hundreds of pounds for charity by inviting customers to make small donations to the Motor Neurone Disease Association for using his taxi. 

He did not make a profit from the cab service, which he hoped would help punters get home safely, and chose the charity because one of his patrons had been diagnosed with the disease. 

Mr Hartfield had raised at least £700 and drove around 100 customers’ homes since he began providing the complimentary rides in November last year. 

But Ashford Borough Council chose to shut the not-for-profit service down on Friday after a local newspaper report highlighted the landlord’s charitable work, according to reports.

Mr Hartfield was told by the authority’s licensing team that he was subject to ‘requirements for local authority licensing’ because his black cab was a ‘private hire vehicle’ – despite the landlord not personally benefitting financially.

He explained that customers of The Flying Horse – which dates back to 1790 – were simply asked to make a charitable donation for using the taxi.

But a council official reportedly wrote back, telling him a person can ‘be said to derive commercial benefit’ – even if a payment isn’t made to him. 

Mr Hartfield told The Telegraph: ‘It’s mean-spirited that we are doing this for charity and I’m not quite sure what I’m going to do, to be honest. 

‘With the Government increasing business rates and rising costs, it just feels like it’s all going against us pubs at the moment.’

Flying Horse customer Paul Upton told the newspaper the council’s decision was ‘pure jobsworth nonsense’.  

Mr Hartfield previously said of his taxi: ‘I bought it especially for the pub. I used to own a black cab garage, so I know cabs.

‘This pub has done a lot for charity, and we have some great customers in the village. There are a lot of lovely people who come here.

‘So, when they ring up and book a table, I ask them if they want a lift home. And if they say yes, they make a donation to charity.’ 

The Flying Horse had formerly been run by Mr Hartfield’s daughter Natasha before he took over. 

So, councils are at it again. They shouldn’t be called councils; they should be called the Mafia.

This man was simultaneously doing two nice things. For what reason would they wish to prevent him from doing that? I’ll explain why: anything that doesn’t increase their income is prohibited.

Even if you tried, you couldn’t make this up. It’s a great way to extinguish neighbourhood spirit in the community, though, and I would encourage more of this, rather than less, but then I guess that’s why we have councils – to show us all what total stupidity looks like.

Of course, eventually there will be no pubs or areas of entertainment, because our government doesn’t want us talking to each other – have you people not learnt anything yet?

This nice, thoughtful man is making sure his customers don’t drink and drive, as well as making money for charity, and the council wants to prevent this. I wonder if the council would stop him if he were collecting illegals from the beaches? He sounds like an extremely nice man, and I hope the foolish council recognise how ludicrous they’re being.

Starmer’s Classroom Class War

Labour has been accused of taking its class warfare into schools with plans to means-test funding based on parental income, in a move that could punish hard-working families.

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson will publish a schools white paper aimed at revamping special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision and halving the attainment gap.

A central aspect of the proposals would involve reforms to how £8 billion in funding is targeted, with household income rather than whether a child receives free school meals used to allocate it.

Labour’s new disadvantage funding formula would also consider where a child lives, as well as how low parental income is and how long this has been the case.

Following a punitive tax assault on private schools, the Conservatives have denounced the ideas as being a part of Labour’s class warfare.

Tory shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: ‘Every child deserves to receive the support they need. But it is wrong to narrow the disadvantage gap by dragging everyone down.’

Yesterday, Ms Phillipson was forced to deny she was a ‘class warrior’ as she promised to ‘come down hard on those who are profiting from the system’.

Speaking to Times Radio, she said: ‘We’ve seen a big expansion, for example, in private equity, in specialist schools, where the quality is often very, very variable, where the costs are high.’

Asked if she sees herself as a ‘class warrior’, she responded: ‘No, I don’t. I’m really ambitious for every child in our country, regardless of background.’

Ms Phillipson has claimed the new funding formula is a ‘golden opportunity’ to cut the link between background and success. She will outline reforms that will see mild special needs cases dealt with in school after the spiralling number of children with behavioural conditions such as ADHD nearly bankrupted councils.

The SEND reforms will also see education, health and care plans (EHCPs) reassessed once children reach the end of primary school from 2029.

Under the proposals, students with less complicated and serious needs, such as autism and ADHD, will reportedly no longer be considered suitable for EHCPs after the number of children with a SEND plan skyrocketed from 240,000 to 639,000 in a decade.

All teachers will be trained to teach SEND children, and mainstream schools will receive a percentage of £4 billion in funding to help them support children with special needs in the classroom.

Numerous children have to go to specialist schools, and some of them are a long way away, and the parents of those children would be devastated if their children lost their places at their school, but this means testing will hurt hard-working people who work but just cannot afford to self-fund.

Sadly, it appears to be that there are so many so called ‘able people’ who don’t seem to have the capacity to learn and understand about ‘diagnosis’, and about the amazing SEN children who learn differently and would also like to achieve in life – but if it’s not happening to them it doesn’t exist, until it does happen to them, then it does!

There are people out there who are peddling myths about this children, and they have no idea. To be honest, it would be more cost-effective to heighten people’s awareness of SEN support and learning because, clearly, some people are not that smart, and what we need in the classroom is well-trained teaching staff and adequate support for children with a diagnosis.

It seems that there is a specific group of people who are jealous that another group can get support for their diagnosis. If a child or person has been diagnosed with a condition by a professional, then they have been diagnosed; it’s as straightforward as that – I just don’t comprehend why ‘able-bodied’ people are so envious of disabled people, because if the shoe were on the other foot, they wouldn’t be so quick to judge.

The Tesla Model S Driver Who Crashed Into A Woman While Reaching For His Phone

Tesla has been forced to fork out almost $250 million to the family of a woman who was killed when a Model S vehicle struck her and her boyfriend while on Autopilot. 

Naibel Benavides Leon, who was 22, died from the crash, while her partner, Dillon Angulo, suffered severe injuries during the impact in Key Largo, Florida, in April 2019. 

The driver, George McGee, confessed that he was leaning down to pick up his phone before the electric vehicle crashed into the couple’s parked car. 

However, McGee said his 2019 Tesla Model S was in ‘Autopilot’ mode, and the car’s feature failed to brake before the fatal collision. 

Benavides Leon’s family sued Tesla and the driver, but their case was consolidated with a criminal indictment in 2024 and subsequently moved to federal court for trial by jury. 

The trial marked a setback for Elon Musk’s vision of advancing self-driving cars and contributed to a precedent for holding vehicle manufacturers accountable. 

Jurors ruled in favour of the family last August, but attorneys for Tesla filed a motion for a new trial, claiming there was not enough evidence to support the assertion that the car’s Autopilot function caused the crash. 

However, US District Judge Beth Bloom supported the jury’s decision on Friday, awarding $200,000,000 to be divided between Angulo and Benavides Leon’s family, with an added $19,470,000 to Benavides Leon’s family, and $19,470,000 to Angulo.

Bloom said the evidence presented in last year’s trial supported the jury’s decision that Tesla was in part at fault for the crash. 

The judge’s decision has finally closed the years-long case that has haunted a bereaved family since the devastating accident.

The horror evening unfolded when Benavides Leon and Angulo pulled over on the side of the road to watch the stars near Key Largo, Florida, on April 25, 2019. 

McGee was driving his Tesla, and video footage from the car’s front camera showed him blowing through a red light at nearly 70mph. 

McGee then crashed into the couple’s parked vehicle, throwing Benavides Leon 75 feet. She was pronounced dead at the scene.

Angulo broke numerous bones and suffered a traumatic brain injury. He attended the trial against Tesla and stepped into the courtroom with a limp. 

In a 60 Minutes interview from October, Angulo recalled the brutal moments of the crash. 

In the end, it was the driver’s fault because autopilot does not imply that the driver should not have constant control of the vehicle; however, it is down to the company as well because they made the vehicle and it was their design, which undoubtedly still has some bugs in it, and automation is certainly not fool proof, and will always need some form of control.

If a product is advertised and it doesn’t do what it was advertised to do, then that suggests the company lied. After all, ‘Red Bull’ was sued because it didn’t give people ‘wings’, but then you’re dealing with a nation that wore face masks because they were told to. Sheep follow sheep!

Cars should invariably be driven by people. Even driverless trains have someone keeping an eye on them in case something goes seriously wrong.

Equipment goes wrong, and when all is said and done, it is just a piece of equipment, and please tell me a piece of equipment that hasn’t gone wrong at some point, but then everybody wants to take zero accountability, and nobody, no matter what type of car it is should be looking for their phone while the car is in motion.

She Became One Of The World’s Richest People – But There’s A Catch

A woman has become the wealthiest person in the history of the world, in theory, but can only spend her money on two things.

Sophie Downing, from Nottingham, was given what she thought was a voucher worth £10 for 200 Degrees Coffee for Christmas. But when using it to purchase a matcha latte last week, she found the balance was much higher – in fact, it was more than £63 quadrillion.

That’s 63 followed by 15 zeros, or a thousand trillion. It means that in theory she is 100,000 times richer than her closest competitor – the somewhat impoverished Elon Musk – but she can only spend the money on coffee and croissants.

Put into perspective, the balance is also 670 times the total of the world economy, but Ms Downing is keeping her feet on the ground. “I thought it was really funny. I’ve never seen anything like that before,” she told NottinghamshireLive.

The 29-year-old first used the gift card at the 200 Degrees coffee shop in Flying Horse Walk, Nottingham, during her lunch break on February 12, and that was when it became apparent that something was amiss with the balance.

“The guy at the till was really confused. His face was just like what?” she remembered. “This massive number came up on the till. He said, ‘I’ve never seen it before, but it’s fine for you to keep it’. I didn’t clock it until he gave me the receipt. I thought, ‘surely not, that’s actually crazy’.

When Ms Downing, the owner of the hair removal company Secret Sugar Club, used the gift card a second time on Tuesday, she discovered the amount remained in the tens of quadrillions.

Since then, she has decided it is best not to keep using the card, although she says that 200 Degrees has not raised the issue with her. She joked that she could have gone in and bought everything from the shop.

“Maybe they have scanned the wrong thing. It looks as though they have scanned the barcode, which has turned into the balance,” she said. “I could go in and clear everything off the shelf, but I don’t want to take the mick. It would be better if it was a different gift card.”

This was clearly a technical error, which could happen to any one of us. At least she can have a coffee and a croissant every day now because the voucher credit will last for an extremely long time – it’s a pity she can’t cash it up for actual money, but then she could always invite Elon Musk out for a coffee.

Police At Andrew’s Home

Police have been seen at Sandringham, where Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is staying and celebrating his 66th birthday.

Six unmarked police cars arrived at King Charles’ Norfolk estate just after 8 am this morning. It is not known at this stage why they are attending.

Onlookers said the group of eight people were in plain clothes ‘but appeared to be police officers’.

 

They parked close to Prince Philip’s former home, Wood Farm, where Andrew has been exiled. One man seemed to be holding a police-issue laptop.

A convoy of vehicles was then photographed departing. 

Andrew, who turns 66 today, is staying at Sandringham after being evicted by his older brother from Royal Lodge in Windsor following the Epstein saga.

Police popped up at Sandringham as Sir Keir Starmer declared ‘nobody is above the law’ in the UK, and nine UK police forces consider whether to launch inquiries into Epstein-related allegations, including human trafficking and sexual assault. 

Andrew is yet to be spoken to by detectives, who are assessing a range of allegations related to sex trafficking and misconduct in public office and sex trafficking. But his brother, King Charles, said he stands ready to help the police with their inquiries.

The Queen’s second son may have passed sensitive information to Epstein in his position as a UK trade envoy. There are also claims he may have smuggled a woman into Buckingham Palace who may have been trafficked into Britain on Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ jet.

Any misconduct is denied by Andrew.

Several police forces are understood to be looking into allegations around trafficking that have appeared in the enormous number of documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein in the UK.

In a statement, the Met said it had ‘not identified any wrongdoing’ but was conducting ‘initial enquiries’ into these specific allegations.

The shamed former Prince has been banished to a remote cottage, Wood Farm, on the edges of the Sandringham estate.

Wood Farm, the property where his father, the Duke of Edinburgh, spent much of his final years, is concealed from public view about 300 yards down a private driveway in Wolferton on the edge of the Norfolk estate.

However, it has now been reported that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on his 66th birthday on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

It is said that the Queen’s second son may have passed sensitive information to Epstein in his role as a UK trade envoy, and there are assertions that he may have smuggled a woman into Buckingham Palace who may have been trafficked into Britain on Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ jet.

Andrew will undoubtedly have access to the greatest solicitors, but I’m sure he’s sweating a little right now. Let’s be clear on this, Keir Starmer said ‘No one is above the law’, unless you include illegal immigrants, because they definitely appear to be.

The Queen paid millions to try to make the story go away, but it never did, so that was money down the drain. Andrew should have been cut off a long time ago and made to fend for himself. However, nothing has actually happened yet, but it was lovely of the police to have popped round to wish Andrew a Happy Birthday, and of course, it’s not just about Andrew, what about the many others that are on these files?

Since Epstein was a businessman, he would have had a lot of contacts with other rich individuals, but this does not imply that everyone was aware of or participating in the sordid actions.

If the man has done something criminal, he should be prosecuted, but so should all the billionaires and oligarchs who had an association with Epstein.

Following his brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest today, the King issued a statement.

“I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office.

What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities.

In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation.

Let me state clearly: the law must take its course.

As this process continues, it would not be right for me to comment further on this matter.

Meanwhile, my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all. Charles R.”

TFL Advert Banned

A Transport for London advert showing a black man and his white friend pestering a white girl on a bus has been banned for ‘reinforcing negative racial stereotypes’.

The Facebook advert was removed after just one complaint from a viewer, who said it was irresponsible, harmful and offensive due to how it portrayed black teenage boys. 

The brief clip revealed a black male verbally harassing a young girl. He was accompanied by a white male friend, who sat down close to the victim, boxing her in’.

The advert was released as part of TfL’s new ‘Act Like a Friend’ campaign that encourages people to intervene safely if they see sexual harassment or hate crime on the network. 

TfL told the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) that both characters intimidated the victim and displayed offensive behaviour.

The advert was one of three made for social media, which had been cut from a two-minute ‘Act Like a Friend’ film.

The two other cut-downs featured a white male perpetrating a hate crime against a black woman and a white male committing a hate crime against another white male.

TfL said that a typical member of the Facebook audience would have been served any combination of the campaign adverts three times.

It is also estimated that the chance of a person seeing only the cut-down that was the subject of the complaint is about 2 per cent.

To ensure they were representative of London’s population across all of their campaigns, TfL said they used a bespoke casting diversity tracker. 

The ASA said it was possible to see the advert in isolation.

ASA said: ‘We understood there was a negative racial stereotype based on the association between black males, including teenagers, and threatening behaviour. We assessed whether the advert reinforced that stereotype.

‘The ad showed a black teenage boy verbally harassing a white girl. While the white male friend was shown in the ad and the two-minute film, the ad did not show him as jointly intimidating the victim. 

‘The only aggressor in the ad was the black teenage boy.

‘Although we understood that TfL had intended to present a range of diversity and scenarios across their campaign, we considered the ad, when seen in isolation, had the effect of perpetuating a negative racial stereotype about black men as perpetrators of threatening behaviour.

‘On that basis, we concluded that the ad featured a harmful stereotype, was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence.’

The ASA ruled that the advert must not appear again in the form complained about, adding: ‘We told TfL to ensure that future ads were socially responsible. We also told them to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes and causing serious offence on the grounds of race.’

A TfL spokeswoman said: ‘Our aim is to ensure that our advertising reflects London’s diverse population and does not perpetuate any stereotypes, just as we ensure that our services are as fair, accessible and inclusive as possible.

‘We’re sorry that this social media advert – a shortened version of the full two-minute advert that includes a diverse range of ethnicities – falls below our usual high standards when viewed in isolation.

‘While very few people will have seen this shortened advert in isolation, we are committed to upholding the ASA’s standards for all of our campaigns and are no longer using this shortened advert in our ongoing campaign to encourage people to support other passengers targeted by hate crime, sexual offences and harassment on our transport network.’

The whole point of these ads is to brainwash people – all the ads that you see are a form of brainwashing – subliminal messaging, and as George Orwell said, ‘The further society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.’

The harassment of women in the UK is typically from men. Still, of course, Sadiq Khan will tell you it’s not true to cover up his own failings, and God forbid anything resembling a possible truth is exposed, but then the regime doesn’t like it when reality is reflected in the media.

Unfortunately, sexism is a genuine issue, and any male who takes advantage of a woman should be jailed. It seems that you can say the reverse of what is true, but not what is true.

The problem is that a guy can no longer speak to a woman without it being seen as harassment or abuse. As a result, people avoid talking to one another or are constantly watching each other out of concern for possible legal repercussions.

New Passport Rules Coming Into Force Next Week

New passport rules could see British children born abroad refused admission to the UK. 

For the first time, dual citizens – including children and babies – will have to show a passport for flights, ferries or trains into Britain or pay for a ‘certificate of entitlement’ to the tune of £589.

The rules will come into force from as early as February 25, sparking backlash from Britons overseas who have been left blindsided by the shift in border controls.

All people born abroad to a UK parent are automatically eligible for dual citizenship that cannot be renounced until turning 18, but that will require them to either get a British passport or pay the £589 charge for a ‘certificate of entitlement’ to travel to the UK.

The changes for Britain’s dual citizens are coming into force as part of the Home Office’s new Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) programme.

Under the new rules, visitors from countries that did not previously require visas to travel to Britain will need to obtain ETAs before entering, including Canada and France. Additionally, it has been warned that there will be knock-on effects for British dual citizens.

Anyone travelling to the UK must prove permission to enter, with airline, ferry, and train firms able to deny boarding if the correct documents are not provided.

The changes that come into force from next Wednesday, February 25, specify that dual citizenship Britons have to show a valid UK passport or certificate of entitlement when arriving in the country.

That is because British and Irish nationals are exempt from ETAs. In the past, they would have been able to travel with non-British passports and use other documents to back up their citizenship if required.

Dual nationals include UK-born people who have acquired nationality from another homeland, those who naturalised or registered as British later in life and people who have been dual nationals since birth.

The Home Office’s new rules mean a British couple’s 10-month-old baby could be ‘turned back at the border’ when they leave for New Zealand in two weeks.  

His grandmother told The Times: ‘We’ve sent off an application with all the documentation requested, but have received a reply saying “you need to send his NZ passport as well”. 

‘We’re not going to do that because then he certainly won’t be able to travel, with no passport at all.’

The family has attempted to get through to the Home Office – but they ‘don’t have lines that deal with this’. 

The grandmother added they have also been to the High Commission in New Zealand, but they were ‘told to go away’ because ‘they don’t deal with this’.

It’s funny how Labour’s policies are making it harder for British citizens who have every right to enter the UK, while illegal migrants can enter the country from France with ease and receive free housing, food, and pocket money—all at the expense of taxpayers.

Our government are making it difficult for British people to return to the UK, while they merrily give away properties to those who despise this country, but then it’s also a cash and grab by our government.

It’s actually not funny anymore because our government are crushing hard-working British people while they carry on with this gentle approach when it comes to migrants entering the UK – the whole thing is crooked.

Britain has always been one of the countries which allowed people with more than one citizenship to enter with any valid passport. Now they pester people about their plans and connections to the country under the disguise of needing to know if they will attempt to access public funds, instead of accepting valid passports for entry at ports.

This probably makes sense to most people, but strictly speaking, a passport is a passport, and nobody should be delayed trying to get back for emergencies or funerals, et cetera.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started