Wales 2030: Truth On The ballot, Or You’re Out

The Welsh Parliament has advanced historic legislation to disqualify politicians who deliberately lie to the public, though the rules are not expected to take effect until the 2030 election.

The Welsh Parliament passed the historic Member Accountability and Elections Bill on 17 March 2026, which officially became law upon receiving Royal Assent on 27 April 2026.

Under Section 24 of the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026, Welsh Ministers are legally required to introduce a new criminal offence that prohibits the making or publishing of false or misleading statements of fact intended to affect the outcome of an election.

The criminal ban on political misinformation under the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026 will not take effect until the 2030 election at the earliest, allowing ministers several years to legally define what constitutes deliberate deception.

Part 1 of the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026 introduces an official recall system, allowing voters to petition and remove a Member of the Senedd between elections if they receive a short prison sentence or if the Standards of Conduct Committee recommends removal for serious misconduct.

Part 2 of the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026 strengthens the standards process by creating a mandatory Standards of Conduct Committee that includes independent lay members, while giving the Senedd Commissioner for Standards new powers to launch investigations on their own initiative.

Under Section 20 of the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026, the Senedd Commissioner for Standards is legally authorised to launch proactive investigations into a politician’s conduct on their own initiative, provided they have reasonable grounds to suspect a rules breach.

Serious misconduct can lead to a vote that kicks the member out.

Supporters of the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026 have hailed the legislation as a ground-breaking milestone that will hold politicians to higher professional standards and help rebuild trust between the public and elected officials.

Critics of the legislation argue that criminalising political statements risks severely limiting free speech, chilling robust democratic debate, and dragging independent courts into highly politicised disputes over what constitutes an intentional lie.

On 17 March 2026, the Senedd overwhelmingly passed the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026 by a vote of 50 to 1, with Reform UK MS Laura Anne Jones casting the only opposing vote.

Wales is not banning every political lie starting tomorrow, as the new criminal rules under the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026 will not take effect until the 2030 election at the earliest.

By passing the Senedd Cymru (Member Accountability and Elections) Act 2026, Wales is putting a formal legal mechanism on the books that can permanently end a politician’s career if a deliberate lie of fact is independently proven and deemed serious enough to trigger disqualification.

Political observers, legal scholars, and democratic reform groups across the globe are closely watching Wales to see how this unprecedented accountability framework functions in practice and whether it successfully rebuilds public trust or inadvertently suppresses robust democratic debate.

Public opinion on implementing this law elsewhere remains deeply divided between supporters who believe it is a vital step toward rebuilding public trust and enforcing professional honesty, and critics who warn it risks chilling free speech, politicising the judiciary, and creating severe legal difficulties over how to fairly define a deliberate lie.

While members of the public enthusiastically praise Wales as a global trailblazer and call for similar rules worldwide, legal experts and political analysts express deep concern over how courts will fairly distinguish an intentional lie from a political opinion without inadvertently chilling free speech.

World War 3: Equal Rights, Equal Draft

If World War 3 happens, the UK could draft young, single women into the military, building on World War II precedents and strong public support for gender equality in wartime service.

The head of the British Army has warned that political leaders will soon tell the public they must make personal sacrifices to prepare for the growing threat of war.

The head of the British Army told Sky News that every citizen will be asked to make personal sacrifices to defend the country.

To lower high US fuel prices caused by a war with Iran, President Trump made a deal to buy Russian diesel while blaming Ukraine for the crisis and urging its leader to step down.

Although the UK has not used mandatory military service since 1960, rising threats from Russia have sparked debate about bringing it back to boost troop numbers.

Six months before World War II officially broke out in 1939, the UK began conscripting men aged 20 and 21 for military training.

By the end of 1941, the UK expanded conscription to older men and women, though women were drafted into supporting roles rather than frontline combat.

In the spring of 1939, rising international tensions forced Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s government to prepare for a potential war against Nazi Germany.

In May 1939, Parliament passed a law requiring around 240,000 young single men to register for six months of military training.

In December 1941, Parliament passed a law making all unmarried women and childless widows aged 20 to 30 liable for the draft.

The UK expanded national service in 1941 because too few volunteers were joining civilian defence and military support units.

Former Defence Secretary Grant Shapps stated that the world is entering a pre-war era, while General Sir Patrick Sanders urged for an expanded army to boost the nation’s readiness for conflict.

Conscription ended in the UK in 1960 when the last soldiers drafted under the National Service scheme were discharged.

During the 2024 general election, Conservative leader Rishi Sunak proposed a mandatory national service scheme for 18-year-olds, which the Labour Party dismissed as a gimmick.

A survey found that 38% of under-40s would refuse to serve in a new world war, and 30% would refuse even during an imminent invasion.

The same survey found that 72% of the public supports conscripting women alongside men if a military draft is introduced.

During World War II, people who refused to fight had to prove the sincerity of their beliefs before a special court to avoid military service.

Many experts fear that modern global conflicts have brought the world closer to World War Three than at any point since the Cold War.

There is no threat of an actual land war or invasion in the UK, but leaders warn the country is already facing digital threats like cyberattacks.

The UK government recommends that households stock a three-day supply of bottled water, tinned food, and battery-powered essentials to prepare for major emergencies.

Although most people believe a major crisis could happen, only a tiny fraction are actually stocking up on emergency supplies.

Many people ignore the advice due to high costs and scepticism, prompting the UK government to plan its largest home defence exercise in decades to test national resilience.

The Cabinet Office’s new campaign will teach households to handle blackouts, while a massive defence exercise secretly tests how officials respond to hostile sabotage.

While the UK government acknowledges that everyday financial survival is the public’s main focus, official resilience guidelines are meant to encourage those who can afford it to prepare so that emergency services can focus their limited resources on the most vulnerable during a crisis, a strategy that has drawn sharp criticism from charities who point out that millions of families facing soaring food costs have absolutely no extra money to build emergency stockpiles.

Public comments regarding the government’s preparedness advice range from deep scepticism and accusations of fearmongering to valid frustrations over the high cost of groceries, though some practical citizens are quietly building basic three-day emergency kits.

Dr Okolie: The Unapproved Clinician Who Worked In The Shadows

Dr Augustine Okolie has admitted to working as an Approved Clinician in Colchester without the required legal status between 2018 and 2023.

The specific medical facility in Colchester where Dr Okolie practised has not been publicly named in the official tribunal records.

A “fitness to practise” committee at the Nursing and Midwifery Council reviewed the case during hearings held between October 5 and 16, 2026.

The NMC panel is still considering whether Dr Okolie hid his lack of approval from his colleagues and managers.

The panel is still deciding if Dr Okolie deliberately lied to his peers and hid his true professional status.

Dr Okolie has admitted that he knew he lacked the required Approved Clinician status between 2018 and 2023.

The panel has formally proved these admissions.

The panel is still deciding whether Dr Okolie ignored a 2024 verification request and lied to a colleague about his approval date.

The NMC is deciding if his misconduct is serious enough to affect his fitness to practise.

The hearing was adjourned on Friday, October 16, before the NMC could make a full decision.

A new date to resume the hearing has not been set yet.

Danny Dyer: Nationalising The Flush, One Giant Poo At A Time

Actor Danny Dyer, alongside Labour MP Kevin McKenna, has delivered an SOS Whitstable petition signed by nearly 350,000 people to 10 Downing Street calling for the full nationalisation of the UK water industry, a move that followed a dramatic protest where they sailed a giant inflatable poo sculpture down the River Thames after Dyer witnessed severe sewage pollution firsthand while filming on the Isle of Sheppey.

The morning fog rolls over the muddy waters of the Thames. In the background, the Houses of Parliament loom majestically.

Suddenly, a modest charter boat cuts through the mist. Mounted proudly on the deck is a colossal, glistening, brown INFLATABLE POO SCULPTURE. It is magnificent. It is terrifying.

Standing at the bow, gripping the railing like George Washington crossing the Delaware, is DANNY DYER (50). He is wearing a high-vis jacket over a sharp designer coat, looking intensely into the middle distance.

Beside him stands LABOUR MP KEVIN MCKENNA, looking slightly terrified, holding a giant clipboard.

DANNY

(To the open water, deeply emotional)

Look at it, Kev. Just look at it. Bobbing along. Pure poetry, mate. It’s a proper statement.

KEVIN

(Nervously adjusting his glasses)

It’s certainly… large, Danny. Do you think the Prime Minister can see it from the window?

DANNY

See it? You could see this magnificent turd from outer space, Kevin! Neil Armstrong would look down and say, “Hold up, Buzz, what’s that proper pony floating past Big Ben?” It’s art, mate. Direct action.

A flock of seagulls circles the inflatable. Danny points a dramatic finger at them.

The protest, organised alongside campaign group SOS Whitstable, culminated in Dyer marching up to the steps of 10 Downing Street to hand-deliver a petition signed by nearly 350,000 citizens. The document demands the immediate nationalisation of the UK water industry, or, in the vernacular of the campaign’s chief spokesperson, “sorting out this proper pony state of affairs before the sea turns entirely into gravy”.

Dyer’s sudden pivot to ecological activism reportedly began while filming his caravan documentary on the Isle of Sheppey. While standing on the shoreline, the actor reportedly smelled a “distinct twang in the air” and realised that British beaches had become entirely “naughty”.

Inside Number 10, the political response was masterfully non-committal. A government spokesperson assured reporters that the Prime Minister wants to see “greater public control” over the water sector, though they stopped short of full public ownership. Political analysts interpret “public control” as a strategic middle ground where the government can look disappointed at water companies without actually having to pay for the pipes.

Meanwhile, Thames Water lenders and executives have expressed deep concern over the stunt, warning that making decisions based on giant river-bound emojis could destabilise the delicate economic balance of charging customers 40% more to swim in sludge.

At press time, political commentators were predicting that if the government does not act soon, Dyer’s next protest will involve a twenty-foot inflatable un-flushed toilet dropped directly down the Downing Street chimney.

The British public warmly embraced the stunt, with thousands demanding “Danny for PM” while noting that sailing a giant inflatable turd down the Thames was the first time a politician had ever accurately represented the state of the nation’s plumbing.

Protection Versus Inclusion

The debate surrounding J.K. Rowling’s views on sex and gender identity is deeply polarised, with supporters arguing that biological sex must be legally and socially distinct to protect women’s spaces. At the same time, critics contend that her stance invalidates transgender identities and fosters harmful discrimination.

Since 2020, J.K. Rowling has consistently defended the position that biological sex and gender identity are not interchangeable, arguing that safeguarding women’s single-sex spaces is essential for privacy and safety, while simultaneously maintaining that transgender individuals deserve to live safely and authentically.

J.K. Rowling’s comments on biological sex and gender identity have generated a complex blend of severe criticism and strong support, resulting in highly visible public disagreements with core Harry Potter cast members alongside defence from other franchise actors.

J.K. Rowling strongly welcomed a landmark UK Supreme Court ruling that unanimously interpreted the words “woman” and “sex” under the [Equality Act 2010](parliament.uk “Supreme Court judgment on the meaning of “sex” in the …”) to refer strictly to biological sex at birth rather than gender identity.

While supporters view her position as a vital defence of sex-based protections, critics contend that her rhetoric undermines the dignity and inclusion of transgender people.

The question of how an individual assigned male at birth can experience an internal identity as a woman is viewed by critics as an impossibility due to the absence of female biological milestones and sex-based socialisation. In contrast, transgender individuals and psychological experts describe it as an innate, psychological sense of self and an intrinsic need for bodily and social alignment rather than a claim to have experienced cisgender womanhood.

Major medical institutions like the American Psychiatric Association and the World Health Organisation define gender dysphoria as the clinically significant distress experienced when a person’s deeply ingrained internal gender identity does not align with their assigned sex at birth.

Gender-critical feminist theorists argue that the medical model of gender dysphoria pathologises what is fundamentally a social issue, contending that treating a rejection of conventional masculinity or femininity as an internal identity disorder reinforces restrictive patriarchal stereotypes and the concept of distinct psychological essences rather than working to dismantle rigid gender roles entirely.

Trans-inclusive feminists argue that accessing gender-affirming medical care is a vital expression of bodily autonomy that alleviates severe distress rather than reinforcing patriarchal stereotypes, contending that true feminist liberation must reject rigid biological determinism to grant all individuals, including transgender women, the fundamental right to define their own bodies, identities, and lived experiences.

“There are two types of male oysters, and one of them can change genders at will. And before man crawled out of the muck, maybe he had the same option. Maybe originally we were supposed to be able to switch genders, and being born with just one sex… is a mutation.”

Handcuffs Instead Of Help: Justice For Ricky

Ricky Swindells, a 28-year-old autistic man struggling with severe mental health issues and psychosis, tragically lost his life after his family called for emergency medical assistance on 24 July 2026 in Rochdale, only for arriving Greater Manchester Police officers to forcefully push him to the ground, handcuff him, and restrain him face-down despite his family’s frantic, dismissed warnings about his heart condition and stopped breathing, leading to a fatal cardiac arrest that is now under an active investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).

The tragic gap in medical care for Ricky Swindells occurred because the initial ambulance was told to stand down while he was already in cardiac arrest, leaving critical minutes to slip away as police officers ignored his family’s frantic warnings about his breathing and heart condition before paramedics were finally recalled to the scene.

The extreme isolation, confusion, and strict policing experienced by Ricky’s heartbroken parents at Salford Royal Hospital—where they were left waiting for hours in the dark at Bed 10 in the ICU with no explanations, entirely unaware that he had never even made it out of the resuscitation room before being told nothing more could be done—culminated in final moments when Ricky was treated strictly as a “crime scene” despite having committed no crime, leaving his family guarded by uniformed officers under an open-door policy that restricted them from even touching their son.

Ricky Swindells tragically lost his life on Duchy Road, Salford, because an emergency call intended to secure urgent medical and mental health assistance for his psychosis instead resulted in fatal neglect when police officers forcefully restrained him face-down, leading to a cardiac arrest before paramedics could intervene.

The critical need for comprehensive and mandatory law enforcement training on mental health crises and neurodiversity is a central demand of advocacy groups, legal representatives, and oversight bodies, who argue that police officers must be properly instructed on how to treat individuals experiencing psychosis or autism to ensure de-escalation tactics and immediate medical intervention prioritize patient safety over physical restraint.

The profound grief and demand for honest, unadulterated answers surrounding the tragic loss of Ricky Swindells on Duchy Road have placed his death at the centre of broader scrutiny regarding systemic shortfalls in mental health emergency responses under Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham’s administration, as the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) continues its independent investigation into whether fatal neglect, disproportionate restraint, and delayed medical care by Greater Manchester Police officers caused another preventable travesty of justice.

The widespread public outrage over the repeated use of the phrase “lessons will be learned” reflects a deep frustration that while ordinary citizens would face immediate dismissal or criminal prosecution for repeated fatal errors, police officers involved in restraint-related deaths are rarely held to the same standard of swift accountability, forcing grieving families to endure years of slow-moving investigations just to see basic standards of justice applied.

One Movie Gave Them Their Lives; Fifty Thousand Voices Gave Them Their Truth

During the 1993 filming of Schindler’s List in Poland, the unexpected arrival of Holocaust survivors eager to share their raw, unscripted experiences profoundly moved director Steven Spielberg, inspiring him to forgo his personal profits from the movie and establish the USC Shoah Foundation, a massive global initiative that has since video-recorded and preserved more than 56,000 eyewitness testimonies to ensure their stories are never forgotten.

Driven by the urgent realisation that these ageing survivors would soon pass away and take their invaluable, unscripted accounts with them, Steven Spielberg was inspired to renounce his personal profits from Schindler’s List and establish the USC Shoah Foundation, launching a monumental global race against time that has permanently preserved over 56,000 video testimonies of Holocaust witnesses.

By directing Schindler’s List (1993), which won seven Academy Awards and is widely considered one of the greatest films ever made, Steven Spielberg transformed himself from the world’s most commercially successful filmmaker into an artist of profound historical significance who pointed his camera at the worst event in human history and forced the world to look.

Refusing to settle for a mere representative sample, Steven Spielberg launched a relentless effort to record every available Holocaust survivor, driven by the urgent knowledge that their finite numbers were shrinking each year and that every story untold at the time of a survivor’s death was a piece of history lost forever.

Over more than thirty years of continuous development by Steven Spielberg, teams of trained interviewers fanned out across fifty-six countries to record survivors in thirty-two languages within their own homes, capturing around fifty thousand testimonies and over a hundred thousand hours of raw human memory that created the largest archive of Holocaust survivor testimony on Earth, which, since 2006, has lived at the University of Southern California as the USC Shoah Foundation to be used by students and scholars worldwide.

Among the thousands recorded was Celina Biniaz, who, after keeping her survival as one of the youngest children on Oskar Schindler’s actual list a secret from even her own children to protect them from the trauma, was moved by watching Schindler’s List to finally sit for the foundation and break her decades of silence, later standing before Steven Spielberg to tell him that he had given her back her voice.

Instead of walking away after completing his film, Steven Spielberg chose to race against time by sending camera crews to fifty-six countries, where they located and sat down with tens of thousands of people the world had nearly let disappear, letting them speak and permanently preserving voices that would otherwise have gone silent into the ground forever.

Profound gratitude truly belongs to Steven Spielberg, his global teams, and, above all, the courageous Holocaust survivors who braved their deepest traumas to record their testimonies so that humanity would never forget.

Holocaust deniers reject the overwhelming historical truth by relying on antisemitic conspiracy theories, deliberate misinformation, and pseudo-scientific falsehoods to claim the genocide was a massive hoax, willfully ignoring meticulous Nazi documentation, the liberation reports of Allied soldiers, and the unassailable firsthand evidence preserved in archives like the USC Shoah Foundation.

The reality of the Holocaust is an undeniable historical certainty cemented by an unassailable mountain of evidence, ranging from the Nazi regime’s own meticulous documentation and photographs to the horrific scenes captured by liberating Allied armies and the over 56,000 firsthand video testimonies that permanently preserve the truth.

To ensure the entire world can bear witness, the USC Shoah Foundation has expanded far beyond a single location by creating a global network that provides full access to its 56,000+ testimonies at more than 170 universities, museums, and research institutions across dozens of countries, alongside a free online platform accessible to anyone with an internet connection.

Reflecting the deep emotional resonance of the archive, everyday viewers, students, and scholars frequently comment on how these personal accounts humanise the vast statistics of the genocide, often echoing Celina Biniaz’s profound tribute to the project’s impact: “Oskar Schindler gave me my life, but Steven Spielberg gave me my voice.”

Oskar Schindler was a German industrialist and Nazi Party member who originally moved to Kraków to profit from cheap Jewish labour but underwent a profound moral transformation upon witnessing Nazi atrocities, ultimately spending his entire personal fortune on bribes to protect roughly 1,200 Jewish workers by famously classifying them as essential to the war effort at his factories, an act of extraordinary courage that earned him the title of Righteous Among the Nations and made him the only Nazi Party member buried on Mount Zion in Jerusalem.

Bags For Life, Or Profit For Life?

An 82-year-old grandma from Leeds has not actually declared war on corporate greed by selling second-hand carrier bags outside Morrisons; this viral story is entirely fake, based on an AI-generated image that has spread across social media platforms like Facebook and X despite clear visual flaws, such as distorted shopping trolleys.

While the story itself is fictional, the concept of a secondhand carrier bag stall actually makes a lot of practical sense because major UK supermarkets have faced growing criticism for raising the price of their “bags for life” to as much as 60p, prompting many eco-conscious community groups and “Buy Nothing” networks to set up informal, real-world “bag banks” to help shoppers bypass these high costs entirely without violating private property or street trading laws.

While major UK supermarkets like Morrisons, Tesco, and Sainsbury’s charge up to 40p or 60p for their reusable bags, real-world community initiatives actively fight these rising costs through volunteer-run “bag banks” in local hubs and grassroots groups like Morsbags, which sew unwanted household textiles into free fabric totes so shoppers can completely bypass supermarket charges while reducing plastic waste.

Shoppers are charged for carrier bags because a mandatory UK government law—originally introduced at 5p in 2015 and raised to 10p in 2021—was designed to slash plastic pollution by creating a psychological financial deterrent. This initiative successfully cut single-use bag consumption by over 95% across major supermarkets. However, the even higher 40p to 60p prices seen today are entirely down to retailers choosing to phase out those thin bags in favour of pricing their own heavy-duty “Bags for Life” at corporate discretion.

UK supermarkets generally avoid paper bags because their production and transport generate a significantly higher carbon footprint than plastic, requiring them to be reused at least three times to be more eco-friendly, which is highly impractical in the wet British climate where fragile paper easily tears when exposed to rain or heavy items.

Using collapsible plastic crates permanently stored in a car boot is widely considered one of the smartest and most cost-effective alternatives to supermarket carrier bags because they eliminate the ongoing cost of buying 60p “bags for life” while providing a rigid, stackable structure that streamlines unpacking and prevents loose groceries from rolling around during the drive home.

For non-drivers who walk or take public transport, rigid folding plastic crates are highly impractical, so they rely instead on mobile, ergonomic alternatives like personal shopping trolleys, heavy-duty backpacks, and thick canvas shoulder totes to comfortably carry large grocery loads over long distances without paying for supermarket plastic bags.

Even with alternative gear available, many shoppers still end up buying plastic carrier bags due to human forgetfulness during spontaneous, unplanned trips, as well as the convenience of repurposing those cheap supermarket bags as household bin liners or protective wrapping for messy items like raw meat and leaky packaging.

According to official data published by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), the average person in England now buys just two single-use plastic bags per year from the main national supermarkets, marking a staggering 98% drop from the 140 bags per person consumed annually before the government mandate was introduced.

Supermarkets charge 40p to 60p for bags because they have completely phased out thin single-use plastic carrier bags in favour of pricing heavier, multi-use “Bags for Life” at their own corporate discretion, utilising a high price point to aggressively incentivise customers to reuse their bags rather than treating thick plastic as disposable.

Stop Wasting, Start Feeding: Change The Code, End The Crisis!

It is a staggering reality that over 1 billion meals worth of perfectly edible food are wasted by businesses every year because current tax codes, logistical hurdles, and government subsidies make it cheaper to dump surplus food into landfills or biogas production than to safely coordinate and transport it to people in need, a broken economic system that organisations like The Felix Project are actively trying to fix through campaigns like the Redistribution Revolution.

The Felix Project is the UK’s leading food redistribution charity, founded in 2016 by Justin and Jane Byam Shaw in memory of their late son Felix, which recently merged with FareShare in 2026 under the unified name Felix to rescue high-quality surplus food from supermarkets, farms, and restaurants and deliver it free of charge to over 8,000 schools, frontline charities, and community hubs supporting 1.5 million people nationwide, while also operating Felix’s Kitchen to cook fresh meals and the Felix Multibank to distribute essential non-food household items.

The majority of the surplus food rescued by Felix comes from farms and growers dealing with seasonal gluts, manufacturers and processors with overproduced or mislabelled stock, wholesalers and distribution centres handling bulk logistics, and major supermarkets and retail chains like Sainsbury’s and Ocado managing unsold stock, all supplemented by a smaller portion from restaurants, caterers, and hospitality venues providing prepared food and ingredients.

Fresh fruit and vegetables make up the vast majority of the food rescued by Felix at 64%, followed closely by drinks and dairy at 8% each, chilled pre-prepared meals at 7%, and cupboard staples at 5%, with the final portion consisting of snacks at 3% and meat and bakery items at 2% each.

Individual food businesses can sign up to donate surplus food by filling out the online supplier form on the Felix website, which allows small businesses like independent cafés and restaurants to utilise the Felix Connect Scheme for fast, ad-hoc pick-ups, while larger manufacturers and retailers can arrange tailored, regularly scheduled collections of fresh, chilled, or frozen stock transported safely via Felix’s temperature-controlled, refrigerated fleet.

Participating restaurants can support the Restaurants Feed London fundraising initiative by signing up for the annual summer campaign—running from World Hunger Day on 28 May through July—which allows establishments to seamlessly add an optional £1 donation to their diners’ bills to fund the rescue and distribution of nutritious food to Londoners facing severe food insecurity.

The initiative has attracted a diverse group of prominent past and present partners, including Michelin-starred destination Gymkhana, acclaimed seasonal dining groups like Spring and Kitty Fisher’s, the sustainable Gladwin Brothers group (Local & Wild), and major hospitality brands such as Park Plaza Hotels and Art’Otels.

Diners and partners frequently praise the campaign for its seamless, low-cost impact, with restaurant directors calling it an effortless “no-brainer” to help tackle hunger and charity volunteers sharing first-hand feedback on the impressive quality of the rescued food it funds.

Create your own website, free on WordPress.com.Create your own website.
Start free