‘End-Of-Life’ Brit Spends £10k

After her only son passed away, a British mother without a fatal condition is going to Switzerland to end her life at an assisted dying facility.

Wendy Duffy, 56, a former care worker from the West Midlands, has paid £10,000 to end her life at Pegasos, a Swiss assisted dying clinic, after losing her son Marcus, 23, four years ago. Despite years of therapy and antidepressants, she has been unable to come to terms with his death.

Speaking just days before her death, Wendy said, “I won’t change my mind. I know it’s hard for you, sweetheart. It will be hard for everyone. But I want to die, and that’s what I’m going to do. And I’ll have a smile on my face when I do, so please be happy for me. My life; my choice.” She added: “I can’t wait.”

In an interview with Daily Mail journalist Jenny Johnson, Wendy told how she lost Marcus in harrowing circumstances four years ago. He had fallen asleep on the sofa while eating a sandwich, hungover after a heavy night out. Soon after, she was faced with every parent’s worst nightmare.

“He was purple,” she said. “I thought, ‘It’s his heart.”

Wendy, who is medically trained, got Marcus to the floor and started CPR, calling for help. Paramedics came and rushed him to the hospital, where the worst news came: half a cherry tomato had been discovered lodged in his windpipe. It had taken specialist equipment to remove it.

Wendy sat with him for five days before his life support was switched off. His organs were donated for transplant. She said, “Afterwards, I got a letter from the man who got his heart. He said that thanks to Marcus, he was able to play with his kids again,” she said. Another recipient was a four-year-old child. “That was a comfort, but it also ripped at me.”

Every day, she went to the funeral home to spend time with her son while listening to his Spotify playlist.

“In the funeral home, I went in every day, and just sat with him, playing through his Spotify list. I broke when I saw him in there. My boy, on a metal table. You can’t come back from that, you know. That’s when I died too, inside. I’m not the same person now as I was. I used to feel things. I don’t care about anything any more.”

It is her choice to end her life. If you have never lost a child, you wouldn’t understand.

Everybody loses someone at some point in their life, but certain losses are irreversible, and everyone handles sorrow differently.

Nothing was going to bring back this woman’s son, and depression isn’t fleeting; it’s a lifelong illness, and for some people, the black dog is an enduring daily visitor.

Regardless of the circumstances, no one else has the authority to dictate to someone what they can do with their body or life since each individual is unique.

Sadly, pain is part of life. It’s called the human condition. I guess that’s why people find religion to find a way of coping, but this decision that this lady has come to is rational to her, but perhaps not so rational to others. She feels that she can’t work past her pain. It’s her decision, but I fear it will leave terrible scars for those left behind.

Surveyor Dies After GP Advised To Call 111

A man died from diabetes complications after a GP told him to ring 111 when he called three times to ask for urgent help, an inquest has heard.

Joshua Haines, 30, was found dead at his home in Leeds, West Yorkshire, on March 16 last year, three days after calling a GP fearing he had life-threatening, untreated diabetes.

Mr Haines expressed worries about his deteriorating symptoms and speculated that he could have a chronic illness.

After reporting extreme dehydration, slurred speech and vomiting, the GP recommended him to contact the non-emergency NHS number 111 instead of being seen in person.

An inquest held at Wakefield Coroner’s Court found Mr Haines died from diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening complication linked to undiagnosed diabetes.

Dr Saleh Majid, whom Mr Haines spoke to on three occasions, said he initially believed the symptoms indicated a stomach bug due to persistent vomiting. The GP told the hearing: ‘I could have done things differently on reflection. I have had time to learn and reflect on this tragic case.’

Assistant coroner Naomi McLoughlin said there were ‘missed opportunities’ to get Mr Haines ‘urgent medical help’.

Speaking after the hearing, Mr Haines’s sister Jessica Parker, said: ‘We’re deeply disappointed and devastated.

‘All we want from this is for no family to go through what we’ve had to go through.’

Claire Lindsey, a spokeswoman of the Yorkshire Ambulance Service, testified before the inquest.

She said had Mr Haines disclosed his symptoms to the GP, he would likely have been classed as a category two emergency.

In this instance, an ambulance should have aimed to be with him in about 40 minutes.

Daniel Lawton, a senior paramedic, said crews attending would likely have identified the condition, begun rehydration and taken Mr Haines to hospital as an emergency.

In further evidence, an investigating doctor added that ‘red flags were missed’ by the NHS GP Extended Access services Mr Haines contacted.

Dr Saleh Majid said diabetes had been considered but agreed it could develop ‘out of the blue’; however, he added he could not assess ‘how far down the line he was’ and did not ‘envisage it being at a life-threatening stage’.

Asked if he made mistakes, Dr Majid said: ‘I could have done things differently on reflection. I have had time to learn and reflect on this tragic case.

‘Things will be done differently.’

Unfortunately, you can’t trust a general practitioner these days since they appear to believe they are all-knowing and divine. When a patient informs their doctor that they don’t feel well, it should be taken seriously and looked into because a person knows their own body, because it’s their body, and the patient should never be frowned upon and looked at like they don’t know what they’re talking about, and this was a terrible waste of a lovely young man.

What happened here was dreadful and so undeserved, and it’s about time the law was changed, and these doctors were charged with manslaughter. How ill do you have to be to be taken seriously? And the doctor had the cheek to say that things would be done differently in the future, but that’s no use to this poor man, is it?

Prisoner Dies After Being Beaten To Death

A child prisoner has died after claims he was ‘beaten to a pulp’ at a young offenders’ institution.

The 16-year-old boy was said to have been found unresponsive in his cell at Feltham Young Offenders’ Institute, in south-west London, on Monday.

Prison staff called for an ambulance, and the teenager was taken to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead two hours later.

His girlfriend, who asked not to be named, said the teenager suffered from a heart condition but did not believe this was the cause of his death.

And when she was asked to examine the body, she said he appeared to have suffered severe injuries.

Last night, a Scotland Yard spokesman said the death was being treated as ‘unexpected’.

They said: ‘On Tuesday, April 21, at 12.05 am, police were notified by staff at Feltham Prison and Young Offender Institute about the death of a boy who had been found unresponsive and later died in hospital.

‘The London Ambulance Service were called at around 9.30 pm on Monday, April 20 and treated the boy, aged 16, before taking him to hospital. He sadly died at 11.43 pm.

‘At this stage, the death is being treated as unexpected, and enquiries remain ongoing. A post-mortem examination will take place in due course.’

The young man’s girlfriend said she had identified his body at West Middlesex Hospital.

‘His body had been beaten to a pulp, he was covered in scuff marks and bruises,’ she told the Daily Mail.

‘We had to look at him through a glass window; we weren’t allowed to say goodbye properly.

‘We are so confused. We don’t know how he died. He did have a heart condition, but it is one that is very rare to die from.

‘His mother is completely broken. She was originally told he had died in the prison, but then later that it was in hospital, so we just don’t know what happened.

‘He had been in trouble, but he was 16, a child, and should have been protected. He had his whole life ahead of him and planned to go back to college, but now he can’t.

‘It is a complete disgrace that this happened.’

A prison source said that if the boy had been injured, he should have been subjected to regular checks every 15 minutes from staff.

‘Heads may roll for this,’ they said. The revelations at the coroner’s court might actually shut Feltham down once and for all.’

Sadly, this teenager was attacked in a young offenders’ prison. A teenager is all that he was. He was not a child, but he wasn’t an adult either.

A child becomes a teenager at 13, and an adult at 20, but the strongest point here is that this site is still operating, and it shouldn’t; it should be shut down.

It was said that the lad’s death was ‘unexpected.’ Well, I would imagine it was unexpected. We don’t expect people to be battered to death in a secure facility, and it wasn’t just ‘unexpected,’ it was murder, and where were all the guards when this was happening? Perhaps they were on a tea break?

Some people are going to question why the lad was in prison – well, it doesn’t actually matter now, he’s dead.

I mean, what could conceivably go wrong in a prison with a load of hormonal lads, who are clearly in there for one reason or another, but whatever the reason, they undoubtedly need support and rehabilitation, not be battered to death, defeats the object, really, don’t you think? Yes, let’s all beat our dysfunctional teenagers to death, one less to worry about! Makes you wonder where our mindset actually is on all of this.

Blue And Floppy Newborn Placed On Mother’s Chest

A midwife positioned a ‘blue and floppy’ newborn on her mother’s chest and said ‘there’s your baby’, an inquest has heard.

Following problems during a scheduled home delivery with the Edgware Midwives home birth team, Poppy Hope Lomas was taken to the hospital and died at the age of seven days.

Barnet Coroner’s Court heard Gemma Lomas was not properly consulted about the risks surrounding the natural delivery of her second child, having delivered her first daughter, Willow, via caesarean section.

Ms Lomas described how midwives were slow to react when Poppy was born ‘blue and floppy’. Doctors from University College Hospital in London later discovered the baby girl had been ‘starved of oxygen’ for ‘around seven to eight minutes’.

In a witness statement read out by her lawyer, Teresa Hargreaves, Ms Lomas said: ‘The midwife placed Poppy on my chest and said, “There’s your baby”.

‘Poppy was blue and floppy. There was blood coming out of her mouth, and her head fell back. That’s a horrific memory that sticks in my mind, being handed my dead baby.

‘I said “there’s something wrong”, but the midwives moved very slowly, there was no sense of urgency.’

The inquest heard Alice Boardman, who was head midwife at Edgware Midwives, had encouraged a vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home but failed to explain the potential risks. 

In her statement, Ms Lomas said: ‘I immediately trusted Alice. She was young, and I felt like she was really advocating for me. She was very upbeat and said, “Let’s go for this.”

‘VBACs were something they did every day. She said they’d just delivered a lady with a VBAC with twins.

‘She said that, because of my previous C-section, I’d have to “jump through a few hoops” and speak to their consultant.

‘I was very much led to believe that the conversation I’d be having with their consultant was just a tick box exercise and there was no good reason I could not have a VBAC at home.’

VBAC deliveries should take place in a ‘suitably staffed and equipped delivery suite’ and ‘with resources available for immediate caesarean delivery’, according to guidance from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG).

Poppy was rushed to the hospital after the midwives, who are the designated home birth team at Barnet Hospital, told Mr Lomas to ring 999. 

After Poppy’s brain was scanned, Dr Giles Kendall, a consultant neonatologist, described the scan as ‘one of the worst that he’d seen in his career’, according to Ms Lomas’s statement.

Dr Kendall believed Poppy had been ‘starved of oxygen for a long time’, Ms Lomas said, while Ms Boardman estimated it to be around seven to eight minutes. 

Ms Lomas said: ‘I still don’t understand how she was without oxygen for so long when the midwives were supposedly monitoring her heart rate.’

Poppy, who had been a healthy baby throughout the pregnancy, died aged seven days old when her breathing tube was removed. Ms Lomas said: ‘That was the worst week of our lives. We knew she wasn’t going to make it.’

The inquest, conducted by senior coroner Andrew Walker, heard midwives also dismissed Ms Lomas’s complaints of pain from her previous C-section scar, including Ms Boardman.

Ms Lomas said: ‘I complained my scar was hurting. It was tight and was starting to really hurt. It felt like it was stretching rather than ripping.

‘I remember saying that it really hurt when she was pushing the Doppler (a handheld ultrasound device used to monitor a baby’s heart rate) hard against my stomach and asking her to stop.

‘She said: “I need to do this, it’s important.’

RCOG guidance states practitioners should be cautious when managing deliveries involving uterine scars, as there is a one in 200 risk of uterine rupture.

Ms Lomas said losing Poppy was even harder to deal with as the baby had been healthy during pregnancy.

She said: ‘She was perfectly fine inside me. She had no defects or problems. It was just those final moments of her birth.

‘That makes her loss even harder to deal with. The fact that it all happened in our home, a place where we should feel safe, has also made the trauma so much worse.’

Edgware Midwives is the designated home birth team at Barnet Hospital, which is part of the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust. 

A Royal Free London spokesperson said: ‘Our heartfelt condolences remain with Poppy Lomas’s family at this incredibly difficult time. 

‘An investigation into the care provided to Ms Lomas and to Poppy has been carried out, and the findings shared with the Lomas family. 

‘We await the outcome of the inquest and will carefully review any matters which are raised.’

All births should be conducted in a hospital, regardless of choice, because if anything goes wrong in a hospital, there is always a team of professionals immediately available for mother and baby.

Home births are not safe because there is no life-saving equipment and medical professionals to help.

Numerous deliveries result in post-partum haemorrhages, and if not conducted in a hospital setting, would likely have resulted in the mother or baby not surviving.

There is a reason women started having babies in hospitals, and I can’t believe that some women still prefer this route, unless there simply is not enough time to get the mother to the hospital. However, the hospital is the more suitable option because there are things you can never plan for during birth.

It is appalling what happened here. I understand that they were from the NHS Midwifery Team, but it is disgusting how casual these caregivers were, especially given the years of experience they must have evidently had. I just hope this case is not buried in reams of paperwork because this needs to be spotlighted. After all, a baby died in their care, and these parents will have to relive this trauma for the rest of their lives.

Smoking Will Be Banned For Anyone Born After 2008

CHILDREN aged 17 or under will face a lifelong ban on purchasing cigarettes in a “landmark” bill which hopes to make a smoke-free generation.

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill passed through Parliament and will make it illegal for anyone born after 2008 to purchase tobacco from a shop.

Additionally, ministers will have the authority to impose stricter regulations on tobacco, vapes, and other byproducts of nicotine.

Both the Commons and Lords have approved a final draft of the ruling, and it is set to become law once it gets royal assent.

The law is one of several changes aimed at addressing the negative health impacts of smoking, which is one of the leading avoidable causes of death, disability, and illness in the nation.

Expanding smoke-free regulations and outlawing vaping outside of schools and hospitals, as well as in vehicles transporting children, are other steps.

Vaping outside hospitals will still be allowed as a way to help those trying to quit.

Makes you chuckle, doesn’t it – they can’t prevent the small boats from crossing the Channel, but they can stop people from smoking.

Obviously, some people won’t be bothered by this, but doesn’t it seem a tad bizarre that our government decided to lower the voting age, but you’re now not allowed to smoke?

People stockpile your cigarettes because they’re going to be worth their weight in gold – it’s called the Black Market.

These are ridiculous laws created to control you because it’s all about control. Ultimately, you won’t be allowed to drive, own your own home, or buy anything from a shop because it will all be done online.

There will be no eating out, there will be curfews, and those who work at night will have to have permits to go out or travel to work.

There will be no socialising, and there will definitely be no Freedom of Speech, but there will still be predators on the streets, feasting off those who don’t follow the rules.

The least of our nation’s problems, in my opinion, is preventing people from smoking and vaping, and who’s going to police all of this? If people want to do something, they will find a way because all it’s going to do is make it more appealing for people, and where are the government going to get that lost tax from – yes, of course, the taxpayer!

Video Postings By ‘Sickfluencer’

A ‘sickfluencer’ who posts videos online to help people acquire disability benefits says she’s accused of “hacking the system” when she’s “just educating people.” Sara Middleton, 47, was first diagnosed with Fibromyalgia, a chronic pain disorder, at age 17.

Over the years, she has also been diagnosed with spinal problems induced by nerve compression, chronic fatigue syndrome, depression, anxiety and inflammation of the chest known as Costochondritis.

Sara, a mum-of-one from Chesterfield, Derbyshire, started to gain a following on TikTok after posting a video ‘ranting’ about welfare reform last spring.

Since then, she has become a chronic illness ‘influencer’, including sharing informative videos for eligible people accessing Personal Independence Payments (PIP) from the government.

Sara said as a result, she has been accused of helping people “cheat, scam or hack the system” to claim undeserved benefits.

But she claims that it’s “not possible to scam the system” because you need to provide medical proof. Sara says she is simply educating people who are genuinely entitled to support on how to communicate their circumstances and needs – and that trolls “don’t understand the system”.

She has a video about the ‘two big mistakes people make that cause them to fail their PIP review’, which has over 229,300 views, and over 96,000 views on a video about what to do when you need to report a change of circumstances, to avoid losing your PIP support.

Sara, a motor finance administrator who also accesses £749 per month in PIP, said: “I never set out to do TikTok, but now I’ve found my tribe on social media. “Unfortunately, there is an awful lot of hate online, especially around benefits like PIP and the Motability scheme.

“People have this idea that you can go to a doctor, tell them you’re a bit sad to get diagnosed with depression, then get PIP and a free BMW. The biggest misconception is that you can help someone cheat the system; all I’m trying to do is educate.

“PIP is the hardest support to get, and I just try to explain to people how to communicate with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to get the benefits they are eligible for. I’m just helping people to stand up for themselves and what they need – their evidence still has to back it up.

“People forget that nobody is exempt from becoming ill – it could be them one day.”

Sara said she is constantly accused of helping people to cheat the system – thanks to a misleading narrative around accessing benefits. Since her first chronic illness diagnosis three decades ago, her pain and struggles have got far worse, and she now uses walking aids.

She said due to nerve damage, sometimes her legs can spontaneously give way – even while crossing the road in front of oncoming traffic – leading to additional anxiety. She said: “Some days I wake up and my husband asks, ‘Where are we on the damage meter today?’

“It is hard, but these are the cards that I was dealt, so I have to deal with it. It’s become quite natural to talk about it – I call myself a ‘veteran of chronic illness’.”

But she said since joining social media and becoming an influencer discussing chronic illness – dubbed a ‘sickfluencer’ – she has discovered the extent of the misunderstanding. She blames the media and politicians for circulating false narratives around people accessing disability benefits.

She said: “Disabled people are just trying to get through things day by day. Then you have politicians suggesting you can come and get a Motability car for tennis elbow, acne or constipation. And people believe it, then they come after us.”

Sara argues that all she does online is encourage people to stand up for themselves when dealing with chronic illness. She said she teaches them how to communicate clearly, in order to meet the criteria, in cases where it can be evidenced.

Sara said: “With PIP, you can’t give key phrases, or say ‘if you use this word, you’ll get this’ – because you need the diagnosis letters, consultant reports, assessment outcomes and test results. I teach people how to communicate their circumstances, how to paint the picture when the assessors ask for details of their situation. Unfortunately, the general consensus is I’m teaching people how to ‘win PIP’.”

She added: “I want to educate, advocate and empower. I want people to be confident and have a fair shot. But nothing I could tell someone would definitively get them a good reward with PIP – that comes down to their medical evidence.”

Well done to this lady because getting awarded PIP is like getting milk from a pigeon.

Some might argue that PIP should only be given to those who are unable to work because of medical issues, and that those who are already receiving benefits shouldn’t be eligible for any benefits at all.

Many persons with disabilities, such as paraplegics or those who have had limbs removed, are employed. Individuals such as this require PIP with assistance to go around; otherwise, they might become confined to their homes.

Some might say that most employers don’t provide cars for their workers to get to work, so why should PIP? Well, it’s easy to say if you’re not disabled. You try getting into work in the rush hour in a wheelchair, particularly a manual wheelchair.

Receiving PIP frequently enables some individuals to continue working, so please stop making such absurd remarks until you can see why those who are employed can claim PIP.

To claim PIP, you need a wealth of proof, whether it be a physical disability or a mental disability, and just because you can’t see a disability does not mean they don’t have one.

I also saw a ludicrous comment that if one gets PIP, they must be claiming other benefits as well. That is such a fraudulent comment because I receive PIP; however, I do not receive any other benefits.

Politicians accept handouts all the time, but no one says anything about that, do they? But giving money to somebody who needs it, and everybody goes nuts!

Single Mother And Two Children Face Eviction

A single mum fears she and her family could be made homeless because her landlord has told her they won’t transfer their home into her name following the death of her father. Saphire O’Connor, 34, was born at the house in Chatham, Kent, where she looks after her two young children, and is a full-time carer to her adult brother.

When her dad, Shaun O’Connor, became terminally ill at the end of last year, it was one of his last wishes to assign the rental agreement to his daughter. Saphire said he wanted to die in the knowledge that his family had a secure roof over their heads.

But housing association MHS Homes has written to her saying that “no succession rights exist”, she must vacate the three-bed terrace property. Saphire said: “My parents took over the tenancy in 1992. It’s the only home we’ve ever known. I have grown up here and gone to school here. My friends are here in this community, and my children have settled here.”

Ms O’Connor said they had been good tenants and could not understand why the Medway-based housing provider had turned down her request for a meeting. She said, “They have been to the house and know the situation we are in.”

Her daughter Malia-Sydney, aged six, has autism and is under an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP). Her one-year-old baby Leo has additional needs, and her brother Christopher, 35, has autism, ADHD and severe learning difficulties.

Saphire, who has lived in the house her entire life, said any changes to their lifestyle would be disruptive and could cause a long-term impact on their mental health and well-being. In correspondence to the family, MHS Homes said: “There is no duty as landlord to provide alternative accommodation.”

It advised Saphire to seek legal guidance and approach the homeless charity, Shelter and Citizens Advice. When approached for comment, Andy Pule, MHS executive director of customer experience, said: “We understand Miss O’Connor’s situation, and we’re sorry for the recent loss of her father.

“There are some circumstances where a tenancy can be passed on when a tenant dies. However, this case is currently with our legal representatives, so it wouldn’t be appropriate to comment further at this time.

“We remain committed to supporting Miss O’Connor and her family, and we continue to work with them, along with Medway Council, to provide appropriate advice and support.”

Sapphire’s cousin, Brydie Wallington, has been supporting her in her fight for a discretionary tenancy of the property. She has also written to the Housing Ombudsman on her behalf. Brydie said: “Any forced move would not only disrupt essential support networks, schooling, and medical care, but would also expose them to a heightened risk of victimisation and harm.

“In particular, it would have a massive impact on Malia’s schooling, as she has an Education, Health and Care Plan in place to attend a local school that is equipped to meet her specific needs; any relocation would risk interrupting this provision and her educational progress.

“Due to their conditions, members of the household are less able to recognise or respond to danger, making unfamiliar environments particularly unsafe. Relocation could severely impact their mental health, stability, and overall well-being, placing them at real risk.

“It is vital that their vulnerabilities are properly recognised and that any housing decisions prioritise their safety, continuity of care, and protection from potential targeting or exploitation.”

The housing association might not have a ‘duty’ to allow her to take over the tenancy, but given the thousands of pounds they’ll have to spend doing the property up once they boot them out, they may as well let them stay there. ‘What happened to morals over duty?’

This woman may not be on the waiting list for a place to live, but she’s also not exactly skipping the queue. If they refuse to let her stay there, she will be forced into private housing—something I wouldn’t even put my dog in!

This is absurd – why cause the family even more anxiety? And even if they are on benefits, that is something we taxpayers have to live with. I definitely have no problem paying towards keeping a roof over this family’s head. I would rather that than have to pay towards immigrants lapping it up in 4-star hotels any day of the week.

What possible sense does it make for her to be chucked out of this home to be transferred to another? Surely, the housing association could administer the paperwork and leave the lady and her children in situ?

Antisemitism Versus Jeremy Corbyn

I need to remain within clear boundaries here because I can’t say whether Jeremy Corbyn would make a better prime minister, since he never became one, and, of course, people view him differently. I believe he has good leadership skills.

He’s indeed a man who challenges things, and he’s not a ‘yes’ man.

He places a lot of emphasis on public services, particularly social care, the NHS, and public utility ownership. He also has a more economic model, such as higher taxes on wealth and expanded workers’ rights, and some people did like him because he would have governed in a way that prioritised social welfare, inequality reduction, and public ownership.

Sadly, some people said that his spending objectives were hazardous and unrealistic, but as long as we exercise caution, there are moments when we must take a small chance and spend in order to acquire.

Then there was the debate surrounding his antisemitism, which was a crucial area of contention for Jeremy Corbyn.

Was he antisemitic? He has never personally been found to be antisemitic, but multiple authoritative investigations and reports concluded that antisemitism arose within the Labour Party during his leadership, and that his leadership failed to address it sufficiently. Different sources interpret this very differently, which is why it has been challenged multiple times.

In 2020, Corbyn acknowledged that antisemitism in Labour was “neither exaggerated nor overstated” and voiced remorse for the harm induced. This was a shift from his earlier suggestion that the issue had been exaggerated for political reasons.

There was a Jewish Labour Movement report. It was a 53-page report submitted in 2019, listing nine instances in which Corbyn was alleged to have personally engaged in antisemitic behaviour or associated with individuals accused of antisemitism. Examples included: Writing a foreword to a book containing antisemitic conspiracy theories. Expressing support for a self‑described Holocaust denier, and attending a wreath‑laying ceremony linked to individuals involved in the 1972 Munich massacre.

Critics have frequently referenced these accusations, which are not legal conclusions.

Some Jewish Labour MPs and party officials said Corbyn ignored direct pleas to act on antisemitism complaints and failed to intervene when members faced abuse.

So, was Jeremy Corbyn antisemitic? There is no official finding that Corbyn himself is antisemitic, and he would make a more suitable prime minister by a country mile than any of the alternatives, but then the choice of who to follow is totally up to the individual. However, he is the kind of man who tells the truth, and that’s why he had to be discredited.

He has a strong sense of integrity and is a trustworthy, honest, and moral person. He is a very competent and well-respected political figure because of his dedication to justice and openness, as well as his careful decision-making process.

He would have supported the working-class people and undoubtedly would have had a wealth tax, which is why the powers that be – corporate entities, the BBC et cetera made sure at every occasion they had to smear this man. However, Mickey Mouse would have probably made a better prime minister than all of them put together!

Chernobyl Disaster Zone – Four Decades On

A frozen world, sealed in time. Earth, as it was known, changed on April 26, 1986, at 1.23 am, when the night split open.

Inside Reactor No. 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, a routine safety test spiralled into disaster.

What ensued was the worst nuclear catastrophe in history. Almost 50,000 inhabitants of nearby Pripyat were evacuated within hours, many told they would return in a few days. Most never did.

Today, four decades on, the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) – a vast, restricted area spanning approximately 2,600sq km – remains one of the most haunting places on Earth.

Nature has returned. Tower blocks that are disintegrating are swallowed by forests. With schoolbooks still open, tables still arranged, and chalk on the blackboards, classrooms are precisely as they were when they were left.

Only the wind and the far-off crackling of Geiger counters break the complete quiet, and yet, despite the creepy silence, the zone is not completely empty.

The people who refuse to vacate the radioactive site, known as the ‘samosely’, are self-settlers who returned illegally to their homes following the disaster. 

Among the most polluted structures is the Pripyat hospital, where the first firefighters were treated. Amidst the turmoil, medical equipment and protective clothes were left behind.

Deep inside the power plant complex itself, corridors once bustling with engineers are now dark and heavily controlled, with peeling paint, exposed wiring and lingering radiation hotspots.

Preserved as stark memories of the moment everything went wrong, the control rooms, which were previously full of bright lights and anxious voices, are now hauntingly quiet.

They have refused to leave the land they had lived on for decades.

The majority are old. Many rely on small-scale farming and imported goods to survive without access to modern services.

As of recent calculations, fewer than 200 remain, their numbers decreasing with time.

About 80 per cent of the re-settlers are women, now aged in their 70s and 80s.

Authorities once attempted to remove them. Now, they are tolerated – ghosts living among ghosts.

In nearby villages, deserted hospitals and schools loom over the empty streets. They remain untouched since the chaos of the nuclear meltdown.

Inside the abandoned city of Pripyat, the Ferris wheel in the amusement park stands stationary, its yellow carriages deteriorating in silence, never having carried a single rider after it was due to open just days after the disaster.

Apartment blocks loom like hollow shells, their windows blown out or dimmed with dirt, while curtains still hang in places, gently moving with the drafts that move through broken glass.

In kindergartens, rows of tiny metal beds remain neatly arranged, and gas masks are spread across the floor – haunting relics of preparations that came too late.

Schoolrooms are littered with rotting textbooks, Soviet propaganda posters peeling from the walls, and exercise books still marked with children’s handwriting frozen in time.

The railway station in the neighbouring town of Yaniv is a mute testimony to the enormous exodus that took place in a matter of hours, with its lines overgrown and its platforms abandoned.

Villages such as Zalissya and Opachychi stand half-reclaimed by woodland, where houses collapse inward, and fruit trees still bloom each spring with no one left to harvest them.

As nature gradually reclaims the ground, roads that formerly connected villages are bent and fractured, and trees are pushing their way through the asphalt.

Street signs remain in place, pointing towards towns that no longer function, their names faded but still readable underneath layers of rust and moss.

Inside abandoned shops, shelves lay empty save for the occasional fragment of packaging, a reminder of lives interrupted mid-routine.

Personal belongings – shoes, toys, photographs – are spread across floors, often precisely where they were left in the rush to evacuate.

The swimming pool in Pripyat, once an epicentre of activity, remained in use for years after the tragedy for cleanup workers, but now sits empty, its tiles broken and its roof partly collapsed.

Soviet-era paintings that depict an idealised future that never materialised nevertheless adhere to the walls of certain structures.

Many buildings are severely unstable, with lifts stuck mid-shaft, stairwells blocked with debris, and whole floors fallen in some locations.

Chernobyl’s unfinished colossi – two cooling towers – are also observable from miles around.

The enormous concrete cylinders protrude from the dead ground, strewn with pieces of metal of variable shapes and sizes.

At the very top, four levels of scaffolding cling to the rim. The intricate structure has somehow managed to survive despite the years of harsh weather it has endured.

Yet, far from being totally deserted, life enters the Exclusion Zone on a daily basis.

Around 3,000 workers rotate in and out – engineers, scientists and technicians overseeing the slow dismantling of the ruined reactor and maintaining the vast steel confinement structure that now cages it.

The concrete sarcophagus that entombed Reactor No. 4 is surrounded by the New Safe Confinement (NSC), which houses the containment operations and nuclear waste management conducted by the Ukrainian government.

During the cleanup after the explosion, teams of men called liquidators tested and washed everything inside the Exclusion Zone.

Anything considered too contaminated to be washed – such as the entire Red Forest, so named because the pine trees absorbed so much radiation that they turned red, and all the houses in the town of Kopachi – was demolished and buried underground instead.

Nobody lives there permanently – except those who chose to return.

When Russian troops invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, they did so through the Exclusion Zone surrounding the ruins of Chernobyl. 

The Russian army occupied the immediate area surrounding the defunct plant for over five weeks, causing an estimated $54million in damage to the Exclusion Zone and the New Safe Confinement.

The Russian army occupied the immediate area surrounding the defunct plant for over five weeks, generating an estimated $54 million in damage to the Exclusion Zone and the New Safe Confinement.

The site of the disaster was a logical base for over 1,000 Russian troops, as the NSC houses electrical operations that connect to Kyiv’s main power grid, and aerial attacks from Ukraine would be unlikely. 

Regular troop and vehicle movements inside the CEZ disrupted the site’s nuclear radiation by agitating dirt and dust, which released more radioactive particles into the atmosphere.

In addition to looting and destroying much of the lab and computer equipment located inside the NSC, the Russian army also cut electrical power to the plant, making the cooling of the deteriorating nuclear material unreliable.

But perhaps the most disturbing legacy of Chernobyl is not the reactor, nor the ruins, but the animals left behind.

When residents fled in 1986, they were forced to abandon their pets. Many were subsequently culled to stop the spread of contamination.

But some survived, and their descendants still roam the zone today.

There are now hundreds of semi-feral dogs living among the ruins, clustered around the power plant, checkpoints and deserted towns.

Images of luminous eyes, contorted bodies, and radiation-warped creatures have become part of Chernobyl legend, along with stories of mutant canines.

The truth is more complicated and, in many respects, more disturbing.

According to studies, isolation, inbreeding, and environmental pressure have formed these canines’ genetic differences from populations beyond the zone.

Some show signs of evolutionary change – genes linked to DNA repair and survival in harsh conditions – but scientists are cautious. 

Contrary to common belief, there is no concrete proof of severe radiation-induced mutations.

Instead, what is occurring is slower and quieter – natural selection at work in one of the most contaminated environments on Earth.

Even the viral pictures of blue dogs seen in recent years were not the result of radiation, but probably caused by chemicals they had rolled in.

Still, the idea lingers as Chernobyl feels like the type of place where such things should exist.

The exclusion zone is now an unintentional test. Ecosystems have recovered since people left. However, radiation is still present in the water, the soil, and the landscape itself.

The area behind the power plant, called the ‘Red Forest’ is one of the most radioactive areas on Earth. 

Some estimates suggest part of the Exclusion Zone may stay unsafe for hundreds to thousands of years, but animals live, reproduce and die here nonetheless.

The dogs – descendants of abandoned pets – are possibly the most poignant symbol of that contradiction. Life continues in a place defined by disaster. 

Chernobyl is no longer just a disaster site. It is a warning, a wilderness, a graveyard – and strangely, a refuge.

A place where humans vanished, but life did not. 

It was said that in 2018, 34 dogs were adopted into the US and Canada. There is publicly no proof that the 34 Chernobyl dogs adopted into the US and Canada in 2018 suffered radiation-related illness or failed to thrive because there were no follow-up studies or news reports.

What we do know is that in 2018, there was an adoption program. It was called the Clean Futures Fund (CFF), and it ran a program to vaccinate, sterilise, and rehome a small number of puppies from the Cernobyl Exclusion Zone. These puppies were allowed to be adopted abroad because the puppies had lower radiation exposure than adult dogs. They underwent radiation screening, veterinary checks, and decontamination before travel, and only dogs that met stringent safety thresholds were cleared for export.

Nevertheless, no scientific or journalistic follow‑up has tracked the health of those specific 34 dogs after adoption. This is a genuine information gap — not something concealed, just something never studied or reported.

However, what we do know about Chernobyl dogs in general is that in recent scientific studies, there has been an insight into the health of dogs still living in the Exclusion Zone, and dogs in the zone reveal genetic differences from normal dog populations, likely due to long-term radiation exposure.

Researchers have discovered distinct populations of dogs living near the reactor vs. in Chernobyl City, with limited interbreeding.

Studies suggest chronic radiation exposure may increase risks of cancer, immune system changes, and decreased lifespan, though research is ongoing. Despite this, numerous dogs in the zone are surviving and even thriving behaviourally, forming stable populations and adapting to extreme conditions.

These findings apply to dogs still living in the zone, not the exported puppies, who had far lower exposure.

Can You Visit Chernobyl Today?

All credible, up‑to‑date sources agree that Chernobyl is presently closed to tourists due to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict, and has been since early 2025. Authorised tourism will only resume once the security situation stabilises.

Tours have been suspended since early 2025 because of military activity in the region.

According to the most recent information, only state and military delegations are permitted entry to the Exclusion Zone, which is still prohibited to ordinary tourists.

Due to the conflict and potential building damage from the occupation, travel guides affirm that Chernobyl is off-limits.

When tours were operating, the radiation exposure on approved routes was low — approximately equivalent to a short flight (5–7 μSv/day).

If tourism continues in the future, expect stringent supervision and compulsory guided tours, passport control and restricted entry zones. Protective clothing (long sleeves, long trousers, closed shoes), and avoiding dangerous structures — numerous buildings are collapsing and are hazardous.

Will Chernobyl reopen to tourists? Well, tour operators are optimistic, but there is no timeline, and safety inspections of the zone and infrastructure will have to be satisfied first.

Dover Gets 6,000 Channel Crossings This Year

More than 600 small boat migrants reached the UK yesterday, pushing this year’s running total past the 6,000 mark.

On Saturday, Border Force ships picked up nine boatloads of migrants in the middle of the Channel and brought them onshore at the Port of Dover.

The Home Office confirmed there were 602 arrivals – the second-highest daily total so far this year, just below the 605 who completed the journey from northern France on February 25.

The latest arrivals brought the total so far this year to 6,077.

It also means that since Labour came to power, 70,701 migrants have crossed the Channel to reach Britain.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: ‘This is yet another day of shame for this weak Prime Minister and Home Secretary.

‘They have no control whatsoever over our borders.

‘Illegal Channel crossings are up by 45 per cent since the general election.

‘Labour’s claims to smash the gangs lie in tatters.’

He added: ‘We need to urgently leave the ECHR, which will enable us to deport these illegal immigrants within a week of arrival. Then the crossings will soon stop.

‘That is the Conservative plan, but Shabana Mahmood and Keir Starmer are too weak to do it.’

It comes after Ms Mahmood was forced to agree to a temporary deal with the French government to continue beach patrols funded by the UK taxpayer.

A previous multi-year deal with Emmanuel Macron’s government, signed in 2023, expired at the end of last month.

The £478 million package was also expected to pay for a new detention centre in France, which has still not opened.

In the new negotiations, Labour has been demanding performance-related payments, which will see funding payments staggered according to the number of migrants who are prevented from leaving the French beaches, but the French have refused to accept Ms Mahmood’s demands.

The interim deal will run for two months – costing the British taxpayer £16.2 million – as attempts are made to thrash out a longer-term agreement.

Last month, Ms Mahmood launched a separate scheme offering failed asylum seekers’ families up to £40,000 to voluntarily leave Britain, but she refused to reveal how many had taken up the offer.

Most failed asylum seeker families who are offered the cash are living in migrant hotels at an average cost of £158,000 a year per family.

Under Ms Mahmood’s scheme, they will receive £10,000 per head up to a maximum of £40,000, plus air tickets home.

This would all go away if our government rescinded the right to claim asylum in the UK and replaced it with a limited number system based on resources, where they would have to apply from abroad, not once they got here, and anyone who arrives from France, arrest them, detain them and then deport them back to their home country immediately. No ifs and no buts!

Unfortunately, the channel situation is quite complicated because you can’t return these people to the embarkation point from which they came. Unlike at an airport.

In international aviation and maritime practice, carriers are responsible for returning objectionable passengers to the point where they boarded when they arrive at a port of entry and are denied admission.

  • People who arrive through an official port,
  • Are presented for inspection,
  • And are refused entry by border authorities.

Small‑boat arrivals in the Channel do not fall under this category, because they are not transported by a carrier and do not arrive through a port.

Sea crossings in small boats are treated as search‑and‑rescue, not as port arrivals

Under maritime law:

  • When a vessel is in distress, the priority is rescue, not immigration enforcement.
  • The UK is obliged to bring people to the nearest safe port capable of providing assistance.

In the Dover Strait, that is almost always the UK, not France, because:

  • UK vessels are usually the ones conducting the rescue,
  • The UK coast is often closer at the moment of interception,
  • The UK has operational responsibility for many rescue zones.

This is why the “return to France” rule cannot simply be applied.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started