Is Shamima Begum’s New Look Just A Pretence?

She’s clothed in the casual urban cool outfit of the London 20 something, with skinny jeans, unzipped hoodie, a Nike baseball cap and fashionable shades.

Her hair coloured and straightened in the style of her generation – she actually could be any young woman about town, but this isn’t any young woman – this is Shamima Begum, the teenager who fled Britain in 2015 to marry an ISIS fighter.

The now 21-year old described with chilling indifference how she wasn’t disturbed by the sight of a severed head, and who said how she had a great time with ISIS, and who justified the bombing of the Manchester Arena.

When photographs surfaced of her this week at the Syrian internment camp, they were bound to cause alarm, and many, including her own family, would struggle to immediately recognise her.

Gone is the black, full-length chador (long, flowing gown) and black hijab which used to frame her face that now carries the suggestion of a smile, and now a news outlet can share the truth about Shamima Begum’s new life at the al-Roj detention centre in northeast Syria, where she’s been living for the past two years.

Speaking to her closest friends, the news outlet discovered how she fills her days watching Good Morning Britain on ITV in her tent, playing charades or dancing to the music of Shakira downloaded from the internet with her fellow Western campmates.

She’s also fond of Zumba classes and watching movies like Spider-Man and Men in Black franchises which are her favourites, and Shamima Begum maintains that she’s changed and that she isn’t that person any more, saying to people in the United Kingdom to give her a second chance because she was young when she left, which she pleaded this week in an emotive interview for a new documentary.

Her rejection of Islamic attire is evidence, for some, at least, that she’s abandoned her past.

Others believe her transformation is part of a ploy to gain sympathy while her lawyers challenge the decision to strip her of her British citizenship.

Last month, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled on national security grounds that she couldn’t return to Britain to seek an appeal against the decision.

Either way, her stunning new image has turned the global spotlight on Shamima Begum and her life at al-Roj. But is she still the same under the new look? And if we let her back into Britain, will others follow – this could be a dangerous path to go down.

And of course, she will want a new identity and then probably pop out another half a dozen children who could all be radicalised in the future, and why take the chance because she’s not an important asset to us anyhow.

This saga could drag on forever, and be a boundless abyss for taxpayers money, and perhaps the answer is for the Government to say no, and to refuse to give any lawyers a penny to defend her.

And things can’t be that bad out there if she can get her hands on hair dye when people in the United Kingdom have been waiting months to get a hair cut, and she can dress in whatever way she wants, she will still always be an ISIS follower.

Her lawyers have probably told her that she needs to dress like this to make the public feel sorry for her, and why are we giving this girl publicity? And shame on the news providers for entertaining this.

Unruly NJ Flyer Forces Plane To Land Mid-Flight After Attacking Passengers

A United Airlines aircraft to Miami was forced to land mid-flight after an unruly New Jersey man attacked two other passengers.

John Yurkovich Jr, 45, had to be restrained with zip ties, and a doctor on board was forced to use Benadryl via injection in his buttocks to help calm him down.

Court reports say that John Yurkovich was arrested after the aircraft, which took off from Newark, NJ, just after 8 am Wednesday, was forced to land in South Carolina due to a disruptive passenger.

According to the FBI complaint, John Yurkovich was carrying two grams of methamphetamine at the time.

The complaint stated that he allegedly became upset after going to the bathroom, and when he returned to his seat, he was acting erratic and seemed to be off-balance, and that when he was seated, he yelled out loud, attracting the attention of some passengers in the neighbouring area.

Authorities said that at one point, the suspect was seen getting what seemed to be pills from his carry on and ingesting them, and a passenger sitting next to him put up his hands to brace himself from Yurkovich falling on him, prompting the suspect to take off his mask and start yelling at the person.

According to court reports, Yurkovich allegedly yelled, “Don’t f–king put your hands on me! I’ll f–king punch you in the face.” He then began hitting the male passenger at least seven times, breaking his glass and cutting open his ear, causing extreme bleeding.

The victim needed seven stitches for the gash on his left ear, which the FBI complaint says was from a series of punches, and the complaint stated that some of the passengers tried to restrain Yurkovich, but one sustained a broken nose in the process.

The unruly passenger was charged with federal assault charges and criminal acts on an aircraft, as well as state charges for alleged drug possession.

John Yurkovich’s lawyer, Rose Mary Parham, told the News & Observer in a statement that the whole incident was quite uncharacteristic of John, and that he was a devoted husband, father and successful businessman.

We can’t have crazed junkie’s going psycho on a plane, and if they can’t be respectful, then they should stay at home, and it’s only a matter of time before something very bad happens on a flight because our friendly skies have long gone.

And it’s nice to see that the passengers helped, but with all the drug-sniffing dogs and security, how on earth did he manage to get Meth on board the aircraft? And they need a no-fly list for people like this, and he should lose his right to fly from now on, and he should have been jailed immediately.

Plastic Particles Pass From Mothers Into Foetuses

Research reveals that small plastic particles in the lungs of pregnant rats move quickly into the hearts, brains and other organs of their foetuses, and it’s the first study in a live mammal to show that the placenta doesn’t block such particles.

The experiments also revealed that the rat foetuses exposed to the particles put on significantly less weight towards the end of gestation, and the research follows the revelation in December of small plastic particles in human placentas, which scientists described as a matter of great concern.

Earlier laboratory research on human placentas donated by mothers after birth has also shown polystyrene beads can cross the placental barrier.

Microplastic pollution has touched every part of the planet, from the top of Mount Everest to the deepest oceans, and people are already known to consume the small particles through food and water, and also breathe them in.

The health impact of small plastic particles in the body is as yet unknown, but scientists say there’s an urgent need to evaluate the problem, especially for growing foetuses and babies, as plastics can carry chemicals that could cause long term harm.

Professor Phoebe Stapleton, at Rutgers University, who led the rat research said that they discovered the plastic nanoparticles everywhere they looked, in the maternal tissues, in the placenta and the foetal tissues, and that they found them in the foetal heart, brain, lungs, liver and kidneys.

Dunzhu Li, at Trinity College Dublin (TCD) in Ireland and not part of the research team, said that this study was extremely important because it shows the potential to transfer plastic particles in mammal pregnancy, and that maybe it might be happening from the very beginning of human life as well, and that the particles were found almost everywhere in the foetus and could also pass through the blood-brain barrier, and it was quite shocking.

Professor John Boland, also at TCD, said that it was however important not to over-interpret the results and that the nanoparticles used were near-spherical in shape, whereas real microplastics were irregular flake like objects.

He said that shape matters, as it dictates how particles interact with their environment, and in October, Li, Boland and co-workers showed that babies fed formula milk in plastic bottles were swallowing millions of particles a day.

The rat study was published in the journal Particle and Fibre Toxicology and involved putting nanoparticles in the trachea of the animals. Stapleton said the number of particles used was estimated to be the equivalent of sixty per cent of the number a human mother would be exposed to in a day, although Li’s opinion was this estimate was too high.

But plastics are now in the air. They leech from plastic bottles, milk, water and coke, and it’s on the land, hence in the food you eat.

Microplastics are in the water, then the fish, then the animals. It’s been found in humans, in the bloodstream, and blood is essentially what the placenta is made of, so now plastic has been discovered in the placenta.

Plastics are chemical polymers that have macromolecular weight, so when we throw them in the water resources, they decay by that time to extremely tiny or small particles that cause water contamination and ultimately severe disease like cancer et cetera. However, the process of decomposing would take a long time, perhaps decades.

Perhaps it’s time to consider other ways to reduce that particle emission in waterways and invest in membrane filter technology, which is a well-known technology used in Israel.

GPs Warn Some UK Patients Are Beginning To Refuse AstraZeneca Vaccine

GPs have warned that some patients in England are refusing the AstraZeneca vaccine or just not turning up for appointments after several European countries suspended the use of the jab over safety concerns.

Doctors are concerned that the recent high profile blood clot reports, which have driven much of western Europe to suspend their rollouts of the jabs, are fuelling an uptick in vaccine hesitancy within the United Kingdom, with appointment no show rates reaching up to fifty per cent at some vaccination sites.

GPs say that some patients have now begun to refuse the AstraZeneca vaccine, instead requesting a first dose of the Pfizer jab, and others have been overwhelmed with calls from people concerned about the reported blood clots.

It’s believed these trends will quickly disappear after studies led by the UK and European Union medicines regulators found the vaccine to be safe and effective. Both also emphasised there’s no indication of a link between the jab and the reported blood clots.

Germany, France, Spain and Italy, along with several other countries, suspended the use of the vaccine after 37 people who received the first dose, out of some 17 million recipients in Europe, later went onto experience a thromboembolic episode.

AstraZeneca said the incidence of such conditions is much lower than would be expected to occur naturally in a general population of this size and is comparable to that of other licenced COVID 19 vaccines.

Scientists and experts have responded with concern to the decision to delay administration of the vaccine, insisting more lives are being put at risk from the COVID 19 than any associated risk with the jab.

These views are shared by numerous GPs, who have warned that confidence in the vaccine is starting to be eroded amongst some patients, and Simon Hodes, a doctor at Bridgewater Surgeries in Watford, told a news outlet that they’ve had several patients not turning up for their appointments or having loads of questions and concerns about it.

He continued that the vast preponderance of patients was happy to proceed with the vaccine once they’d reviewed the full details behind the headlines or after a consultation with a member of the vaccinating team.

Another GP in Harrow said concern surrounding the AstraZeneca jab had become a genuine problem and said that they’d seen this, big time and that they’d had twenty per cent either no show or decline, as people didn’t want the AstraZeneca jab, and loads of phone calls from people only wanting Pfizer and declining the AstraZeneca.

This is why the media need to act more responsibly because it doesn’t matter if they print a story several days later saying that AstraZeneca has been proven to be safe. Pretty much like when someone accuses someone of something – nobody cares if a story is printed later saying that they’ve been found innocent because people will only ever retain the allegations, and that’s what sticks in their minds.

The media love this pandemic, and it’s been blown way out of proportion in terms of the risks to the whole population, but to the media this is magnificent, and their reporting has created hysteria, worry and fear amongst millions of people.

They love to spread fear, whether it’s long COVID, another wave, people not playing by the rules or now the alleged side effects of the vaccine.

Over 20 million people have had the vaccine so far, but suddenly it’s only become a story in the last week or so.

Is it because we’re moving away from the lockdown, or because we might be beating the virus? Or is it because COVID will be something we just have to live with as we move into Spring and Summer?

The media should quit reporting the pandemic for a couple of months and let the United Kingdom get its head back on, but whatever way you look at it, the fallout from the lockdown will be extensive and there will be damage to mental health, damage to our economy but our society will be with us for years.

Britons Brace For Wine Deficits

The price of wine could increase from July as wine imports from the European Union will be subjected to additional post-Brexit checks.

Exporters from the EU sending produce to Britain will have to fill out a VI-1 form. The form includes specific questions such as how strong the wine is, what grape it’s made from and how many containers it’s being sent in and will require customs officials to stamp it before goods are permitted to move.

Wine importer and wholesaler Daniel Lambert told BBC Newsnight that he imports thousands of bottles of wine from the EU each week to sell to Britains, but he said he’s worried EU exporters could go elsewhere because of the checks needed when shipping to the United Kingdom, and he stated that they were now finding since Brexit that very few producers knew what they needed to do.

He added that if you give them a problem they’re less likely to want to export to that particular market, and he highlighted that as there isn’t a deficit of wine and that they’ve got loads of places to choose where they can market and the United Kingdom won’t be the first destination market.

Under the new requirements, each different kind of wine in a consignment must have its own form, listing all details of its contents, but he said that this could be a mistake as the United Kingdom was an international hub for wine.

His comments came as the average Brit drinks on average 108 bottles of wine a year, and Brit consumption puts the country as one of the largest buyers of wine in the Western world.

Fifty-five per cent of the wine Britons drink comes from the EU which comes to about £2 billion a year, and according to the market and consumer database Statista, France and Italy were the top two countries of origin for wine imported into the United Kingdom in 2020. However, the United Kingdom still imports wine from other places, but these non-EU nations also require the same VI-1 form.

Countries including New Zealand, Australia, the US and South Africa make up the rest of the UK market, and Statista showed how wine imported from New Zeland and Australia alone accounted for £559.5 million of wine imported to the United Kingdom in 2020.

And I’m sure there are loads of wine guzzlers that buy great tasting wine from the United Kingdom – the EU will be sorry when they put their prices up, and there are much more superior wines out there, and I’m pretty sure their threats won’t affect us Brits, but it will affect them more than it will affect our wine drinkers in the United Kingdom.

If Europe doesn’t want to profit from us, then we in the United Kingdom can get ours from elsewhere. They’re not the only place in the world that makes great wine, and if they want to cut off their nose to spite their face, then we should let them do it.

It should also be mentioned that we have excellent cheese producers here in the United Kingdom, and all this will do is make consumers shift to other countries, and in the end, any wine coming from the EU will not be bought, and this will hit winemakers all over the EU.

We have numerous winemakers in the United Kingdom, so we should be supporting our own vineyards. However, we’re supposed to have a trade arrangement with the EU. Funny thing is, we have a trade deficit with them, and surely there can only be one winner in this little battle.

The Ultimate Catfish

A youthful Japanese female motorbike rider has fooled thousands on social media after she was exposed as a 50-year-old man with long luscious hair.

The Japanese rider, who goes under the username @azusagakuyuki on Twitter, has gained a following of nearly 18,000 with life updates and photos dressed in a motorcycle jacket or posing with Yamaha bikes.

But eagle-eyed fans suspected something wasn’t right when a mirror image in one of the photos showed a different face.

A Japanese entertainment TV show managed to hunt down the author of the Twitter feed, discovering a middle-aged man was behind the images after he pulled his bike helmet off to expose himself in the ultimate catfish moment.

The man named Zonggu said he used photo editing apps such as FaceApp to make himself look like a younger attractive woman because he thought no one wanted to see an old uncle.

The pretty girl image gained him a multitude of fans, with some even assuming the girl in the photos just edited her photos to make herself more attractive.

However, her fan base began noticing unusual things in the pictures, including a masculine-looking hairy arm and a wing mirror reflection showing a man’s facial features.

The man said he turned to the face changing app because he wanted to get popularity on social media, as well as increase the engagement of his posts.

His impressive editing skills led to thousands of likes and hundreds of retweets on his posts, and he told the TV show he enjoyed the feeling of becoming an online celebrity.

Ironically it was the unveiling of his identity that went viral, with thousands of impressed people saying he did a magnificent job turning himself into such an attractive girl, and one man quipped that his hair was so luscious and that it was deserving of a clickbait.

Numerous women joked that the guy looked prettier than they did, while others described the catfish as next level, and one person wrote that everyone believed it, and it was the best catfish ever.

Meanwhile, dozens said they will never trust anything they see on social media, with one quipping that their trust issues have been upgraded.

At the end of the day, this person simply fed the world what they enjoy most, lies and fabrications, but clearly, this man had great ambition, but I think he was wrong in thinking that no one would have followed a 50-year-old biker on social media.

And I think that if we’ve learnt anything in the past four years under the Trump fiasco, is that people want to be lied to and duped, and it appears that people enjoy not only being deceived, lied to, and being made fools of, they thrive on it, and these days, you don’t know who is who, or what is what.

He simply gave people what they wanted to see, and people might be able to deceive us with photo editing on some face converter app, but it does make you wonder what the real face of Donald Trump is now, or anyone for that matter, but at least this guys hair was real, and he outplayed the system, and everyone has his or her faults, there’s no perfection in this life.

Porn Could Automatically Be Blocked On Phones

Conservative legislators in Utah have introduced a motion that would automatically block pornography on phones and tablets sold in the state, a move that critics have blasted as unconstitutional.

Governor Spencer Cox has not openly indicated if he backs the proposal, but a spokeswoman said he will carefully consider the measure before a March 25 deadline.

Supporters of the state senate proposal claim that restricting graphic material helps parents protect their children, many of whom have their own devices, and are consuming more time online during the coronavirus pandemic – adults would be able to turn off the filters if they choose.

Legislators in the majority Mormon state have previously ordered warning labels on pornography, declaring it a public health crisis in 2016, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has railed against pornography in a conservative culture that sometimes considers mainstream magazines and lingerie catalogues offensive.

Phone manufacturers and retailers claimed filters would be too difficult to implement in a single state, and successfully lobbied for a provision that would only allow the proposal to be enforced if at least five other states follow suit.

If the bill is signed into law, Utah would be the first state to mandate filters on devices.

Federal constraints aimed at restricting children from viewing porn in the 1990s were struck down in the courts.

The National Centre on Sexual Exploitation said the bill would help parents who’ve had difficulty managing filters on their children’s devices.

Executive Director Dawn Hawkins said in a statement that Utah has passed a critical, common-sense solution to better protect vulnerable children from accessing objectionable pornographic content on phones and tablets.

Republican Rep. Susan Pulsipher, the bill’s sponsor said that a child that wants to find it and tries to would probably be able to still, but that it was just one step in the right direction, and Susan Pulsipher maintains the move doesn’t infringe free speech rights because adults can disarm the censors. However, some advocates disagree.

And Samir Jain, policy director at the Centre for Democracy and Technology, a Washington, DC-based Internet policy group said that you’ve got the state mandating the filtering of lawful content and that fosters immediate First Amendment Flags.

Samir Jain said that the wording of the bill could apply to any device ‘activated’ in Utah, meaning it could be used to track the location of anyone passing through the state.

Porn could also be classified as an addition that has destroyed countless marriages and relationships and could lead to more aberrant behaviours. Such as porn with young girls and children which makes a bundle of money for the human traffickers.

However, people can be addicted to anything from caffeine to sugar which are the biggest addictions in the United States – should people be barred from those for their own good as well? But of course, we shouldn’t be supporting children having access to porn, but then should children be allowed to have a phone unsupervised?

And Utah lawmakers want phones and tablets to be shipped with parental controls preconfigured to block porn because evidently, the legislators think that parents are far too stupid to set up parental controls themselves – to be fair, they might be right about the last bit.

This Is What COVID Has Done To My Body

Amy Durant, 31, from Surrey, has been ill with long-COVID since March 2020, and a review found that at least 10 per cent of people infected with COVID 19 have suffered symptoms for months and that this is more prevalent in women and children, but what does it feel like to go from being healthy to debilitating by long COVID.

Amy Durant first got coronavirus symptoms about 14 March last year, although she didn’t know where she’d caught it because she wasn’t going out that much and was being careful, so it was most probably the supermarket.

She said it was before the first lockdown, so people weren’t wearing masks, and the overall feeling was that it wasn’t that widespread in the population, especially outside of cities.

She said that she lives with two people who she believed were particularly vulnerable – her grandmother, 92, and her partner, who has type 1 diabetes, and she said that she was the only person in the house who she wasn’t concerned about as the narrative at the time was that if you were young, you were fine.

Amy said that as soon as her symptoms started, the typical high temperature, all over body pain, and later a cough, she was convinced it was COVID. Although she couldn’t get tested back then, and she was officially diagnosed in July with an antibody test, and she said that in her entire life as an adult she’d never had an illness with a high temperature, and that she didn’t get sick, and that she had no underlying conditions, but she was later diagnosed with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis where the immune system attacks the thyroid gland and causes inflammation, but she doesn’t know if it predated the COVID.

She said that when the symptoms began she asked her dad to come and pick her grandmother up to keep her safe. Sadly, she must have already have caught it from her because she and her dad came down with it a week later at his flat, although thankfully they both recovered quickly – her diabetic partner, who she continued to isolate with never exhibited any symptoms.

Amy said that the first few days she couldn’t get out of bed or eat anything, but that she was kind of expecting that, and she said that the acute symptoms lasted several days but that her breathing continued to be affected and her chest felt tight.

She tried to seek medical help but would just be on hold to 111 for hours, but then if you did get through they would ask what felt like ridiculous questions, such as “Can you concentrate on watching TV?”, and that if you said yes, then they would say you weren’t sick enough to be hospitalised – it was all pretty traumatic.

And it’s causing a lot of despair in communities of people with autoimmune diseases and functional neurological disorders who’ve struggled along for decades with no help and precious little recognition, who are now seeing the same symptoms getting tremendous attention – not because they begrudge the long-COVID victims the attention, far from it, they know the debilitating symptoms only too well, but because there’s been such stigma and lack of concern for comparable conditions for so long, but hopefully now there will be a sharper focus.

The good thing is that the attention benefits us all, with more exposure to the facts, more recognition, more research and more help, well, hopefully!

UK University Students Accuse COVID Patrol Police Of Harassment

Students at some UK campuses have accused their universities of giving police officers access to halls of residence to monitor for breaches of coronavirus rules, with some complaints of police entering accommodation in the middle of the night.

Students at Sheffield and Manchester who spoke to a news outlet reported regular police patrols and widespread use of penalties of up to £800 to circumvent repeating the major coronavirus outbreaks that transpired in autumn, now students are returning for the spring term.

Students at Sheffield and Manchester say they think that in some cases police officers may have received keys from university security to enter flats unannounced to check that students were not socialising with their neighbours, however, the universities have denied this.

One first-year student living in Froggatt Halls, which is run by the University of Sheffield, said that police have been patrolling the area in which several halls of residence are located every weekend, with her flat visited three times in the last month.

She said the first time was at 1.30 am and she was in bed. The door had been left on the latch, so the police officer came in and was pretty aggressive.

She said that across the hall she could see another police officer chatting to a girl alone in her flat, asking how many people lived there, but she said it was an invasion of privacy.

A student at the University of Leeds said the police had been given access to his accommodation block at about 4 pm one day in mid-February and knocked when he was watching TV with his housemates.

He said the guy asked who was in his flat and that he was pretty forceful and said that he came into the kitchen and said we were all taking the p*ss and the university had called them in to tell them it was their last chance.

A student rent strike group at the University of Sussex tweeted that students should video police entering their flats on their phones and take their badge numbers, as well as asking the reasons for their entry after a group received several reports of heavy-handed policing.

Students at the University of Manchester published a report with the police monitoring network Netpol, saying that multiple police cars patrol the Fallowfield campus every weekend.

The students, who run a campaign called Cops Off Campus, have used legal observer training from the activist group Green and Black Cross to gather testimonies suggesting that unlawful searches of students properties have occurred on numerous occasions, usually under the guise of noise complaints, even when flats are quiet.

However, it’s not implausible to think that some party-loving students may think it’s a great laugh to shop a fellow student who goes to bed early, but it’s also not implausible to think that some party-loving students may socialise in each other’s flats rather than strictly remaining in their own.

The police aren’t supposed to come into your home at any hour of the night while you’re sleeping, especially if they don’t have a warrant – is this even legal? And why would you even want to stay at a university when you’re treated like this? Especially when you’re paying loads of money to be educated there – go abroad and leave this authoritarian stinking cesspit of a country – they’d probably be so much better off.

And there’s going to be a massive mental health pandemic in years to come because you can’t treat young people like their in a concentration camp and expect them to be okay about it.

Moderna Commences COVID Vaccine Trials In Children

Moderna has started dosing patients in a mid to late-stage study of its COVID 19 vaccine in children aged six months to less than 12 years.

The study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two doses of its mRNA-1273 shot given 28 days apart and plans to enrol about 6,750 children in the United States and Canada.

A similar trial of the shot in children ages 12 to 17 is now underway and fully enrolled, as is one being conducted by Pfizer for children ages 12 and older.

If Moderna and Pfizer trials go well, middle and high school-aged children could get vaccinated by the fall, but with tests for younger children just beginning, they probably won’t get vaccinated until early next year.

Moderna’s vaccine has now been approved for emergency use in American’s 18 years and older, but children haven’t been of a high priority for vaccinations because they tend to get infected at lower rates, and COVID 19 rarely proves fatal for them.

More than 21 per cent of US adults have now had one or more doses of the coronavirus vaccine, and 11.5 per cent of the population is fully vaccinated.

In the early days of the rollout, officials were centred on the challenges of ramping up the vaccine stock and ensuring that the most at-risk people, ageing Americans, health care workers, and those with high-risk chronic conditions, got vaccinated first.

Now, as vaccines become more broadly available, experts have expressed concern that vaccine hesitancy could become a barrier to progress towards attaining herd immunity.

Dr Fauci and other public health officials estimated that at least 70 to 80 per cent of the US population needs to have immunity through vaccination or a previous infection to keep the virus from taking off again.

Numerous American’s seem reluctant to get vaccinated, or getting their children jabs, but this could become an essential tool for keeping the coronavirus at bay.

What’s more, an increasing percentage of schools across the country are reopening as the deadline for President Biden’s goal of getting children back to school within the first 100 days of his term approaches.

So far, children don’t seem to be significant vectors of the disease, but the more children are in contact with their peers and teachers, the more potential there will be for viral spread amongst them.

And there’s been a huge response towards these new vaccines and numerous people are extremely angry, so why is this one so different when people have been born into a world where an entire series of vaccines are compulsory for children, with many starting straight away after birth, and with these vaccinations, numerous dangerous communicable childhood diseases have been prevented for decades, so why would these new vaccines be a problem?

Vaccines are usually put under rigorous testing over several years. They’re tested and tested and then tested again to make sure there are no unfavourable side effects in people that are going to have the vaccination coursing through their veins.

But with the COVID 19 vaccines, people have no concept of what the side effects will be initially and over numerous years, and not many parents will allow their infants and young children to take part in what is a trial because the vaccine hasn’t been tested for long enough, and when it comes down to it, giving a child a vaccine that’s not been tested properly, and consciously allowing that equates to child abuse.

And now there’s evidently been COVID associated deaths, so far suspected in Europe. So, do we get the jab, or do we measure our odds against all eventualities?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started