THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Millionaire Tory Benefactor Demands Boris Johnson Come Clean

A top Tory contributor has said Boris Johnson must answer questions about his family life and the domestic disturbance with girlfriend Carrie Symond’s if he wants to be Prime Minister.

John Griffin, the taxi magnate who founded Addison Lee, said Boris Johnson needed to answer questions about the number of children he has and what occurred when police were summoned to the home he shares with Carrie Symonds.

I’m not too sure why Mr Griffin needs to know the goings on with Boris Johnson or how many children he has, perhaps it’s because in the last six years he’s invested £4 million in the Conservatives.

The domestic row has plagued Boris Johnson’s campaign since it surfaced on Friday, but we certainly don’t need an explanation. It’s Boris Johnson’s business, and everybody has arguments, but we don’t get entangled in everyone’s disputes.

Boris and his girlfriend are just human beings, and like everyone else, they fight like everyone else, and like everyone else, they should be left alone to their own devices.

I can’t say that old Boris is going to be a great Prime Minister or a bad one, but the fact that he can have a good argument means he has character and at least a little understanding, it’s more than I can say about other MPs.

Police were called to the house Boris Johnson shares with Carrie Symonds on Thursday night after a loud disturbance was heard and recorded by neighbours. Jeez, haven’t they got anything better to do with their time?

Mr Griffin also added that Boris Johnson further needed to discuss his family life and come clean about his behaviour as a father if he wanted the top job, but his family life and his behaviour as a father has nothing to do with him becoming Prime Minister, one is parental responsibilities and one is ministerial responsibilities, and one should not conflict with the other.

Boris Johnson has four children with Marina Wheeler, his estranged wife, and another from an affair. He has declined to discuss on rumours of other children. It’s none of our damn business!

But Mr Griffin believes that Boris has been a wee bit offhand about his responsibilities and his family, and he said that his children need his love and attention and that he needs to prove that he’s given it to them and that it was one of the ways you measure a person. My mother always told me that you can measure a person by the kind of shoes he wears!

Whether Boris Johnson is a good father or a bad father, he certainly doesn’t need to tell us about it, and a neighbour of Boris Johnson’s said he had no idea who was living next door to, he simply assumed he was a bloke he’d chatted to about aliens, yeah right…

It’s not like Boris has disguised himself in a red wig and a red nose, he has this glorious mop of blonde hair that’s often unkempt, you could recognise him from a mile away, okay, perhaps a bit of an overstatement, but I’m sure you get the idea.

Film director Wayne Mosley, 47, said the Tory MP never introduced himself by title and that he only knew him as a neighbour when they had a six-minute discussion about aliens. Now you would assume that a film director would recognise such a public personality whose on TV and on the front of the tabloids, or was he carrying his white cane at the time?

I know that if Boris Johnson was living next door to me I would make it my vocation to know what was going on, and I would certainly be curtain twitching, which I’m sure this guy was doing at the time of their argument. Neighbourhood Watch has nothing on this guy!

And if I noticed a chap getting out of a black car like Men in Black, I’d be thinking “nice car”, I wonder who owns that? I wouldn’t mind his phone number, and apparently, as Boris was getting out of the vehicle this chap was standing there smoking weed, well, not to piss on this guys bomb fire, I’m sure Boris and his chums done much worse in their heyday, but then whose going for brownie points? Oh yeah, the guy that supposedly didn’t recognise Boris Johnson, oh do me a favour!

I suppose Boris could have said who he was while they were chatting, but as the guy said, he didn’t know who Boris Johnson was, probably because he was smoking too much weed and he was actually seeing aliens, well, what do you expect from a film director! And he said that if he’d known it was Boris Johnson he would have told him to get him a job, but hey, I thought he was a film producer, wow, that spliff must have been good.

Distressing Images Show Desperate Bedrooms Where Britain’s Children Are Forced To Sleep

These images capture the bedrooms where disadvantaged children sleep and live across London.

Bedrooms of London is a new photographic exhibition at the Foundling Museum and documents the living conditions of London’s children who are living in poverty.

In partnership with The Childhood Trust, the series of photographs by artist Katie Wilson are accompanied by often-heartbreaking narratives of how families manage in such situations.

0_Bedrooms-Of-London (5).jpg

Some of the tragic photographs and narratives display cots crammed in tiny spaces next to kitchenettes and expose how parents are forced to wash clothes in the shower.

Other children, like newborn Jane and her mother Amelie who live in a bedsit at a hostel and are kept awake at night due to nightly parties, late-night disturbances and chronic substance abuse from next-door-neighbours, in a city where total poverty and wealth live side by side.

Bedrooms of London looks at the shocking existence of home life for the 700,000 children currently living beneath the poverty line in the city.

0_Bedrooms-Of-London (4).jpg

There are more than 1 million families waiting for social housing in England, and shelter figures reveal that around 1.15 million households are on waiting lists, with approximately 290,000 homes made available.

Around two-thirds (65 per cent) of families have been on lists for more than a year, while 27 per cent had been waiting for more than five years.

Six London authorities were amongst the top 10 councils with the greatest shortfall, with areas including Brighton, Blackpool and Strood in Kent also struggling.

0_Bedrooms-Of-London (3).jpg

In Newham, east London, 25,729 households were on the waiting list, with only 588 social homes free, and in Brighton and Hove there were 24,392 families on lists, and only 949 homes available, and the gap has been created by a shortage of newbuild social homes, and many existing homes being sold off through the right to buy scheme and not being replaced.

And the fact that some survivors of the Grenfell Tower fire were still homeless a year on from the accident has completely swayed people’s confidence in the safety net the state apparently provides.

0_Bedrooms-Of-London (2).jpg

Imagine how frustrating life must be for the millions of people elsewhere in the country who have been stuck on waiting lists, for years on end, and it’s not only restricted to London but happening right across the country, from Brighton to Blackpool, families who are unable to get settled and unable to get on with their lives.

The Grenfell disaster should have marked a turning point in the nation’s approach to social housing and its tenants, and there should have been a bold new plan for social housing so families were not sentenced to waiting lists but given reliable, safe and affordable housing as soon as possible.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government stated more than 357,000 new affordable properties had been delivered since 2010, and it stated it would be investing an additional £9 billion in affordable homes, including £2 billion to help councils and housing associations build properties for social rent, while also giving councils the capability to acquire £1 billion to build new properties in areas with the highest affordability constraints.

The £2 billion was pledged by Theresa May but critics, including Tory council leaders, announced it wasn’t enough to fix Britain’s housing dilemma, but then we have the Royals who live off benefits paid by the taxpayer, yet those renters in council houses are classified as subordinate subjects and commoners, and this is where class distinction and out-and-out pomposity will remain strong and healthy in the United Kingdom for as long as the Queen and her jobless family rule these subordinate subjects.

The Monarchy has sometimes been defined as the most expensive institution, with Royal finances shrouded in complexity and secrecy, and about £10 million from the Queen’s private estate was paid into the Cayman Islands and Bermuda between 2004 and 2005, and a leak, which saw millions of documents published and exposed how the powerful and rich have secretly invested large sums in offshore tax havens.

And while Britons are all expected to pay tax either directly, through contributions, such as National Insurance and Income Tax, or indirectly through things such as VAT, the Queen is an exception.

One of the perks of being monarch is that she is officially excluded from UK tax laws, but despite this, in 1992 the Queen decided to voluntarily start paying income tax and capital gains tax, however before this, she did not.

It’s not the culmination of her investments, it’s not a question of tax avoidance, but of judgement on behalf of her advisors, and it’s remarkable and perplexing that her advisers could have felt that it was fitting for somebody whose reputation is based so much on setting a good example to invest in these offshore funds.

The Queen should, of course, apologise for her adviser’s investment decisions because anyone that’s putting money into tax havens in order to evade taxation in Britain, should either apologise, but further realise what it does to our society.

If a really rich person wants to evade taxation in Britain and therefore puts money into a tax haven somewhere, who loses? Schools, hospitals, housing, all those public services lose and the rest of the people have to pay to cover up the shortfall created by that.

Eventually, people will no longer have the right to live in their council home for life as ministers impose a five year limit on new tenancies. It’s likely to break up communities because the government has unobtrusively tabled an amendment to the housing and planning bill that sets a maximum of five-year terms for new secure tenancies.

This policy brings an end to the principle of council tenancies for life in which people were sometimes allowed to pass on the right to live in the home to their next of kin, and even though it doesn’t apply retrospectively to current contracts, those who inherit tenancy of council housing will be subjected to the new regime.

It was David Cameron who first indicated that he would like to make such a move as long ago as 2010 when he proposed it could assist to improve social mobility, and of course, not everyone will support this and it will cause quite a big argument, and in future when you’re given a council home, you should ask if it’s for a fixed period because maybe in five or ten years down the line you might be doing a different job and be paid better money, and you won’t need that home because as far as they’re concerned you can now afford to go into the private sector, but it won’t stop there!

People are now being told that if they work, and it doesn’t matter how much they get, they’re not classed as needing social housing because they work, and that’s enough for them, even if they are below the breadline, and now new legislation forces councils to offer all new tenants contracts of between two and five years.

At the end of the fixed term, local authorities will have to carry out a review of the tenant’s circumstances to determine whether to grant a new tenancy, move the tenant into another more suitable social rented property, or end the tenancy.

Where the local authority decides to end the tenancy, they will be expected to provide support the tenant into home ownership or to assist them access other housing options, whichever is suitable, but this is startling that ministers have legislated to deny families a permanent home.

Margaret Thatcher passed a law that gave council tenants secure tenancies, which David Cameron then ripped up, with these Tory ministers seeming to have a vendetta against council tenants and council homes.

These pictures look like prison cells with precious few amenities, so welcome to Toryland where things can only get worse, and clearly, these aren’t the good times that David Cameron promised us, we’re still waiting for those – well, actually these are the good times, wait until Brexit is concluded!

Or perhaps we’ve simply been spoiled because before and following the war children would have to eat gravel if they were starving, and people lived in worse conditions growing up, but then these aren’t war times and things should have got better because now we’re simply descending into the depths of poverty.

People whine about people on benefits having an iPhone but most people have a pay as you go phone, people who can just manage this months gas and electric bill, and some who don’t actually own a TV, don’t smoke and the only drugs that they’re on are prescription drugs required to keep them moving and alive.

Some homes are damp, have mildew and are drafty in the winter, and don’t have many chattels. I wonder where these people are going wrong because they would love the amount of money the Tories get and can afford an iPhone.

Propaganda is a wonderful thing as far as the press are concerned, but you shouldn’t believe all the drivel they elbow down your throat, and most but not all justify the cuts and abuse from the DWP and capita, and they do it to justify the governments next pay rise, which they don’t deserve, they deserve a pay cut of 30 per cent to help pay off the countries debt.

There might be some people out there that was one of ten children, born during the war and slept three to a bed, shared clothes and were really poor, but this is not war, this is the 21st century, and people just don’t know how to live like this, they’re not used to it, and maybe we have been spoilt, but instead of going backwards, we should be going forward, and many of these people are living in hostels, that’s why it’s called a housing crisis because there are not enough affordable homes, not only in London but elsewhere as well.

This is Britain in complete denial, this is Britain with a government that is not fit to run a toilet, and the Tory party should be removed before they grind us all to the depths of the sewers from where they crawled from to punish those in need of help, and it wouldn’t matter if thousands of children a week were dying through dictatorial policies, there would still be shallow, ignorant indoctrinated jerks who would still vote Tory.

I’m not saying that everyone is shallow or ignorant, but I would love to hear from at least 10 people on what they believe is causing this major issue in this country, where people have lost their jobs or the DWP has messed up again, which leads to more poverty, eviction and having to live in crack holes like these.

This is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, yet most elderly people have to live on pensions in the United Kingdom, and it’s a riotous jungle out with the government raking in millions, while the preponderance of people out there are broke, and it’s about to get worse.

This is not a third world country, and I bet our MPs wouldn’t live like that, they don’t live like that, and that’s mental cruelty by our government, and Charles Dickens would be horrified.

Lack Of Tory Condemnation

Foreign Office minister Mark Field was rightly suspended on Friday after his hostile assault on a female demonstrator, but if the Tory MP had any decency he would have quit immediately, and it speaks volumes about Jeremy Hunt, one of the contenders for the leadership, that he declined to denounce Mark Field’s actions, and it tells you even more about Boris Johnson that he declined to discuss it at all.

The picture of Mark Field in a dinner jacket seizing a woman by the throat could be a metaphor for all that is evil with this overbearing Government.

It’s the feeling of entitlement, disdain for those outside their gilded circle and contempt for those who try to protest, and the removing of Tory MP and expenses cheat Chris Davies only adds to the stink of corruption encompassing this Government, and with each day that’s passing the Conservatives are demonstrating they’re no longer qualified to govern.

It’s odd how the Tories will support any right-wing gathering or subversive, boldly taking to the streets against a foreign left of centre government, but any nonviolent demonstrators here are only fit to be beaten, punched, wrestled, imprisoned and generally abused.

Even being consistently on the wrong side of history doesn’t hinder their sense of entitlement whilst they destroy thousands, and torture tens of thousands, and exile hundreds of thousands.

Welcome to the safe haven in Chequers General where they perhaps are the biggest abusers of poverty, and then they go to Chequers for their New Year festivities, and don’t forget, the Queen will then give them an OBE or even a knighthood, after all, if Jimmy Savile could get one, it appears that anyone is now qualified.

The female demonstrator may not have been an invited guest, and she could have been carrying anything from a gun, knife or corrosive liquid on her person, but isn’t that what they have security for? Has Mark Field suddenly become the security services for the government?

methode_times_prod_web_bin_ce84bc56-9424-11e9-a1cf-8a70d1d684b0.jpg

The MP might have atoned for confronting Janet Barker, but he hardly marched her away, he grabbed her by the neck, and although he’s been suspended as Foreign Office minister, this is a genuinely disturbing situation, because she could have simply been escorted out peacefully, but instead, this mad man lost his temper and grabbed her by the neck.

A Tory monster with no moral compass, and like most MPs, they think it’s okay to get stinking drunk and grab this woman from the back of the neck.

This man was a government minister with responsibilities, and it’s really not appropriate, even though the woman he attacked said he had an anger issue, but it goes way deeper than that. Clearly, he’s extremely superior against women, and it’s getting more noticeable how these Tory beasts are being exposed more and more as the modern world closes in around them.

Janet Barker informed the BBC the purpose of the demonstration had been to talk to men who are in power, the bankers, the investors that are continuing to invest in fossil fuels.

They were there to deliver a polite message, but the MP unquestionably mistreated her in a way that was extremely disagreeable, yet Janet Barker doesn’t think that his actions amounted to criminal assault and that she didn’t want it turned into a mud-slinging competition, and she would rather that he speculated on what he did and not do it again, and maybe go to anger management classes.

Apparently, Mark Field said that he felt threatened and that he intuitively reacted when Janet Barker hurried past.

Wow, a man that feels intimidated by a woman, he must have been horribly threatened by Theresa May!

Evidently, there was no security present, which I find difficult to believe, and that for a split second, he was genuinely concerned that she might be armed. Yes, armed with a mouthpiece to exploit the true dealings of what government is really all about.

It was stated that Mark Field presumably placed his hand on Janet Barker’s neck because if he had touched her anywhere else it would have been considered extremely improper, but it was extremely inappropriate that he touched her at all.

Clearly, security had been breached, and there should be an inquiry on how it was breached, and now Theresa May should invite the Climate change protesters to No. 10 to put forward what they would like to happen.

Alarming Precedent Being Set

The NHS was created on the belief that it was free for everyone, regardless of means or circumstances, but this is no longer the case because patients at a trust in the north-west of England have been informed they will have to go private if they want treatments that were once customary on the NHS.

Because a disturbing precedent is being installed which threatens to threaten the foundations of our National Health Service, and the consequences of the funding restraint imposed by the Conservatives, and cash-strapped commissioning groups are having to ration operations that were once free.

As a result, people are being turned away, usually in severe discomfort, except if they have the funds to pay for private healthcare, and we’re presently seeing the core values of the NHS being slaughtered by a Tory government which has starved it of funds and then permitted private firms to feast on people’s pain and suffering.

And the empty words of Theresa May were exposed when she was questioned by Jeremy Corbyn on the Government’s response to the Grenfell disaster.

The Labour leader, who praised our Never Again campaign, challenged the Prime Minister to clarify why hundreds of blocks still have unsafe cladding. He further wanted to know why sprinklers had not been retrofitted and why no action was taken to improve tenants’ rights, but Theresa May failed to answer any questions, yet in the wake of the disaster, she promised to do everything she could to keep people safe.

Her record tells a different tale. Fire regulations have not been updated, tenants are still denied a voice and firefighter numbers have been cut. Sympathetic words are just not enough, and the survivors of the fire should not still be waiting for her Government to make good on its word.

One day the Mirror might actually write an editorial about the £1.7 billion the NHS had to pay out due to its workers not bothering to do their jobs properly, or they might do an article about the real cost to the taxpayers of a broken system that hires “disability denial” firms to conduct Personal Independence Assessments, in which 75 per cent of cases are overturned on appeal.

There’s no real saving in using these firms, and the government has to pay the assessment company for their work, then use DWP staff to conduct Mandatory Reconsiderations which are normally rejected, then pay DWP workers to present a case of their decision when it goes to Independent Tribunal, then, when the DWP decision is overturned the taxpayer has to repay all the benefits to the claimant from the time they were wrongly assessed, and continue paying the correct benefit to the claimant.

Wouldn’t it have saved a lot more money to bring all assessments back in- house with real professionals, and doctors doing the assessments? And the government has done its best to destroy the NHS beyond repair, leaving it wide open to privatisation on the grounds that it’s the only way to save it.

And the Tories and Nigel Farage are all on the payroll of the private sector and disaster capitalists because the NHS is just another cherry to pick, and they’re sleepwalking into an abyss, they don’t care about you, they merely care about their bank balance. They’re millionaires already with their private healthcare which is their holy grail, and if the poor can’t pay for their healthcare, you die, but then that would be the Tory mission accomplished.

The Tories did everything they could to hinder the formation of the NHS and have used every opportunity since to wound it. Now they’re going to use Brexit to kill it off altogether by selling it to a greedy and seedy corporate America. The people of the United Kingdom can either have Brexit or the NHS but be warned, we can’t have both.

No Action Over Jo Brand

Jo Brand will not face police action over a comment she made on the radio about throwing battery acid over politicians, even though Scotland Yard were considering an allegation of incitement to violence.

Jo Brand made the remarks on Radio 4 programme Heresy and has since apologised, describing her remarks as crass and ill-judged, but her comments sparked an objection with Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage amongst the critics, and the Met said it was assessing them following an allegation of incitement to violence.

The force said that police received an allegation of incitement to violence on 13 June 2019, relating to remarks made on a radio programme, but now the referral has been viewed by the MPS and no more police action is going to be taken in connection to the allegation.

In response to a question about the state of UK politics, Brand had said: “Well, yes, I would say that but that’s because certain unpleasant characters are being thrown to the fore and they’re very, very easy to hate and I’m kind of thinking ‘Why bother with a milkshake when you could get some battery acid?’

“That’s just me. I’m not going to do it, it’s purely a fantasy, but I think milkshakes are pathetic, I honestly do, sorry.”

Comedian David Baddiel, who created Heresy, stated the BBC was wrong to edit the joke out of a repeat of the programme, and speaking to Newsnight, he said: “I don’t think I would have nipped it out. Morally wrong? I’m not sure. I think they’re just trying not to cause trouble.

“The BBC are still to some extent the aunty of the nation and they don’t like trouble. Even though they did commission a show, Heresy, that was designed to push the boundaries of what people might think and say.

“If it was up to me, I would have kept that line in for the repeat. Apart from anything, it’s a bit silly when it’s had massive coverage to cut it out – that looks a bit cowardly.”

Jo Brand has since atoned for the joke, calling it “crass and ill-judged”, and the BBC said it regretted any offence caused by the radio programme, which was never intended to encourage or condone violence.

But tell me one joke that doesn’t offend someone? We’re a politically correct world gone wrong, and there doesn’t appear to be any escape, and our leaders don’t seem to be giving us any hope.

But her comment really was no laughing matter if you consider those unfortunate people who were victims of acid attacks, and Danny Baker got fired over a royal baby remark, so should Jo Brand get fired too?

The problem is, comedy is a pretty questionable arena, where some remarks can be taken the wrong way when it’s merely comedy and nothing more, and if you listened to her comment, she never specified anyone in particular. After all, Katie Hopkins has said much worse in the past and got away with it.

Jo Brand is a comedienne, it was a joke, the apology is in the title of her job, and we shouldn’t be upset by her comments, but we should be offended by the lies told by politicians about money and the unfair distribution of benefits and how the poorer members of our society are penalised, time and time again.

And if there are people out there that believe that Jo Brand’s comment was offensive, then perhaps the BBC should ban stabbings, rape, paedophilia, prostitution and drug taking in the soaps on TV because that could actually incite violence and other unlawful things, as well as upsetting those who have suffered from them.

We hear anecdotes about all members of society, from disabled people to your mother in law and nobody actually complains about that, and it might have been bad timing, but anyone with a grain of sense should have known that it was a joke on a comedy show, even it if was a tad close to the mark.

The fact that they’re targetting satire now is a bit extreme, don’t anybody leave their homes because you might get arrested for saying something witty and then it gets distorted in our politically correct society, and do we now have a judge of comedy?

I guess you could say that because she commented, even though it was a joke, that some idiot out there might carry out her remarks, now that she’s put it out there, but if this is the case perhaps Horror movies shouldn’t be put on TV because someone out there might go on a rampage and start killing everyone.

At the end of the day television influences most people that watch it, but it doesn’t mean that someone who watches “This is England” would carry out racism or when an advert comes on the TV about Mars Bars that someone would instantly run out and buy one.

However, Jo Brand is an ex-mental health nurse, so you would expect her to realise that there are vulnerable and unstable people out there who may now see this as acceptable behaviour. It’s not a question of idiots and ignorance or how low one’s IQ is, you would have expected Jo Brand to have some perception and consideration of this, even if some others don’t.

Boris Johnson Branded A Racist

Boris Johnson had an unhappy birthday as he was branded a racist unfit for office, and while the former Foreign Secretary managed to tighten his grasp on the Tory crown in the latest leadership vote, the Mirror Chicken brought him down a peck or two as he proceeded to evade some big questions.

Boris Johnson, who just turned 55, secured 143 votes in the latest ballot, up 17 on Tuesday.

He said: “Thank you again for your support, especially on my birthday! We’ve come a long way but we have much further to go.”

International Development Secretary Rory Stewart, who began the race as an outsider but bookies had made second-favourite, was the latest hopeful to drop out after getting only 27 votes, 10 fewer than on Tuesday.

The next vote is Thursday and MPs will decide between Boris Johnson, Home Secretary Sajid Javid, Environment Secretary Michael Gove and Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt, but while Boris Johnson continues the runaway favourite, his now tarnished standing has experienced a fresh bruising.

Citing the gaffe-prone Brexiteer’s previous comments, Scottish National Party leader Ian Blackford told the Commons “not only is [Mr Johnson] racist, he is stoking division in communities and has a record of dishonesty”.

Avoiding a criticism from the Speaker, he said Mr Johnson has “called Muslim women ‘letterboxes’, described African people as having ‘watermelon smiles’ and another disgusting slur that I would never dignify by repeating”.

He added: “If that’s not racist, I don’t know what is. Does the minister honestly believe that this man is fit for the office of Prime Minister?”

Outside, Jeremy Corbyn’s spokesperson said: “ Boris Johnson has clearly made a series of troubling Islamophobic and racially charged comments going back over an extremely long period of time.”

The blasts came after Boris Johnson’s day got off to a poor start when the Mirror Chicken put him in a flap yet again, but he was given a birthday cake outside his South London flat, and as he set off to Parliament ahead of the leadership vote, he was still dodging questions on why there should not be a general election, given he called for one when Gordon Brown took over from Tony Blair in 2007.

Boris Johnson was boosted in the poll by the support of ex- Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab, who stated he was the sole person who could guarantee Brexit by October 31, and his nearest rival Jeremy Hunt got 54 votes, followed by nearest rival Mr Hunt who got 54 votes, followed by Michael Gove with 51 and Sajid Javid with 38.

Mr Stewart said of his departure: “I am so moved and inspired by the support I have received. It has given me new faith in politics, in our country.”

And as the two hours of voting commenced, Mr Stewart had accused competitors of using “dark arts” to blast his bid and gave possible backers city status for constituencies in a bid for support.

Theresa May again declined to disclose who she backed, waggling her finger as she said: “I told you yesterday, none of your business.”

The fourth and fifth rounds will leave two competitors standing. The decision is expected by late afternoon, and the expected 160,000 Tory Party members will then decide between them, with the victor announced in the week starting July 22.

Meanwhile, an employment solicitor who challenged the leadership candidates during the live BBC debate was suspended from his position over a former social media remark, and law firm Leigh Day is investigating a tweet by Aman Thakar, a former Labour candidate in a South London local council election.

Earlier, Imam Abdullah Patel, who asked about Islamophobia in the TV debate, was suspended from his mosque and the school he works at amid a probe over past remarks on Israel. The BBC stated he would not have been chosen to quiz hopefuls had they been known.

And Boris Johnson being a bigot, sexist, Islamaphobe and simply an idiot will seemingly get him in as Prime Minister, what a sad world we live in, and people need to wake up and smell the coffee, and in the end the United Kingdom is going to be controlled by a host of Establishment, posh boys.

The Conservatives operate at the huge double standard as it seems does the speaker, Mr Bercow, and Boris Johnson has made some dreadful comments about Scotland and the Scottish people which shows the attitudes of the Conservative party who would be delighted to see the break up of the United Kingdom to deliver Brexit, and the Conservatives are effectively all by themselves causing the break up of this once magnificent country.

We should truly question why Boris Johnson is the favourite to win, and it should actually make us question what is really going on, and anyone with half a brain must realise that he’s not fit to be Prime Minister, his track record demonstrates that over and over again.

As for his private life, well it’s his life, but now he’s a confirmed liar, but then all politicians lie, but Boris Johnson is so blatant about it, and he couldn’t care less, and he’s certainly no diplomat, he’s demonstrated that often enough, and it really doesn’t make any sense why he’s the favourite for Prime Minister.

Perhaps they’re using him as the fall guy, but then that wouldn’t make much sense because if that was the cause it could lead to a general election, which they don’t want.

Perhaps I’m a little thick and need to be treated like a six-year-old, but out of all the competitors, Boris Johnson is the least equipped to do the job, and even those who back him, evade the obvious questions about his competence and simply bang on about what a fabulous mayor he was et cetera.

Perhaps it’s just my paranoia kicking in, but I can’t help but question what is really going on and if there’s some concealed agenda, and to be fair I don’t think much of the competitors. There’s the fool Boris Johnson, who lies more than Pinocchio, then there’s Michael Gove and the only vision he sees is Vision Express, and then there’s Sajid Javid who looks like a boiled egg with a face, and then there’s the miry looking Jeremy Hunt.

methode_times_prod_web_bin_38b8ec62-7f0a-11e9-9cce-178843284a7a.jpg

Jeremy Hunt made a mess of the NHS and now believes he can run a country… the four of them are pitiful, and let’s pray that Theresa May doesn’t leave her bloomers on the bedroom radiator when she leaves No. 10, as those four look more into knicker sniffing than running a country.

It appears that the Tories are only supporting unfit for office Boris Johnson because they’re hoping they’ll get a top position in his cabinet, putting the wicked Tory party before industry and the country and its people because the despicable Tories only think about saving their own bacon.

But maybe that precisely why Boris Johnson will become the next Prime Minister because Tory members see him as some sort of hero who will sort out Brexit and reverse political correctness, but the whole world knows that Boris Johnson is a bigot, fool, stupid, pretentious, bloated, elitist, right-wing nincompoop, but that’s why they’re Tories, they’re all mini-Boris’s, and if it walks like a racist, quacks like a racist, makes as many references that are blatantly racist, it’s Boris.

Boris Johnson’s supposedly good job left London as the most polluted city in the EU and saddled taxpayers with a £950 billion burden for his failed vanity schemes, and people want his ridiculous fool in charge of the nation’s finances, why? Good grief!

Boris Johnson is a continual liar, adulterer and fraudster, but the principal judgment against him should be that he’s just incompetent and unfit for purpose. He’s a total liar, and as mayor, he cut all parks police officers under a bog off, and following 3 years the contracts concluded and parks police suffered and now parks aren’t patrolled as much, and whoever wins now, we lose.

Boris Johnson Finally Surfaces

Submarine Boris Johnson is finally surfacing to launch his Tory leadership campaign, and the blonde-haired Brexiteer Buffon is currently the frontrunner for 10 Downing Street.

Yes, that’s the same MP who jeopardised incarcerated mum Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe in Iran, called black people “piccaninnies”, rugby tackled a 10-year-old boy on a business trip, accused the President of Turkey of defiling a goat, called Barack Obama “part-Kenyan”, said a Libyan city would be great once they “clear the dead bodies away”, and bragged about whisky tariffs at a Sikh Temple.

He was further dismissed from the Tory frontbench in 2004 over allegations, he lied about an affair and dismissed from the Times as a young journalist for making up a quote.

He quipped about homosexual people as “tank-topped bum boys” and ridiculed Muslim women as “letterboxes”, and he has questions to respond to over his conflicting accounts of whether he ever took cocaine, so you can sort of tell why the gaffe-prone ex-mayor of London has been kept hidden until now.

Those who worked with him accused him of not reading his briefs and neglecting to show the thoroughness required to be Prime Minister, and rival Rory Stewart implied he couldn’t be trusted with instructions for the UK’s nuclear submarines.

But despite previous flip-flopping, writing one article for Remain and one for Leave, he’s convinced a parade of Tory Brexiteers MPs will support him by pledging to leave the EU on October 31, deal or no deal.

That means MPs look set to put him in the final two candidates next week. Then all he needs is to win a vote by 160,000 Tory members and he’ll be Prime Minister by the end of July, but there’s more than just Boris Johnson going on, but he’s still the star of the show, and here’s everything you need to know.

Slippery Boris Johnson is out of hiding and pushing towards No Deal Brexit, and he has more than twice the number of MPs supporting him than his nearest competitor, including Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay, but he’s been kept out of the limelight to circumvent blunders which might endanger his lead.

He will say: “After three years and two missed deadlines, we must leave the EU on October 31.” And he will take questions from the press, but how many? At this point, no number of questions will be enough, and he’s starting just an hour before PMQs so may have to conveniently run off.

In a sarcastic jibe at the notoriously unreliable politician, former Tory leader William Hague warned the victor would only survive if they had a plan to break the Brexit deadlock, and the Tory heavyweight stated that without one, the next Prime Minister would lead a sandcastle administration, which would quickly disintegrate.

In comments described as a warning about Boris Johnson, he stated it was “by no means clear” that candidates were ready for “what is going to hit them if they win”.

But will MPs attempt to prevent a no deal? They will certainly attempt to ambush the Tory leadership hopefuls with a vote to try and pave the way to block a no deal Brexit.

Jeremy Corbyn’s party has united with the SNP, Liberal Democrats, Greens and some Tories led by Oliver Letwin, and their motion will force a vote, and if it succeeds, it will put MPs, not the government, in command of the parliamentary agenda on Tuesday 25 June 2019.

MPs can then use that time to pass a legally-binding motion to block No Deal Brexit, and it’s significant because numerous Tory leadership contenders, including Boris Johnson, have said they will leave the EU with or without a deal on October 31.

Header_2347555_16.91-1024x576.jpg

Dominic Raab even stated he would prorogue Parliament, effectively suspending the House of Commons, in order to avoid MPs blocking no deal on October 31, and Labour’s Shadow Brexit Minister Jenny Chapman denied it would undermine Britain’s unwritten constitution.

She told the BBC: “This is just about parliament doing its job and saying to the government, ‘you don’t have the consent of parliament.'”

Sajid Javid will begin his campaign too, and the Home Secretary awed intellectuals with a glossy video boastfully showcasing his heritage, his upbringing, his family and his pet pooch.

The video told of his father leaving Pakistan in 1961 with “one pound in his pocket”.

But he’s had a faltering start to the race and some think he can win the support needed from backers of competitors like Jeremy Hunt and Michael Gove.

He’s also been hit by his handling of migrant boats in the Channel, when he was accused of playing politics, and earlier when he was Business Secretary, the now-failed salvation of British Steel.

Dominic Raab declined to lift an old non-disclosure agreement, and the MP signed the agreement with a former colleague after he faced a bullying claim in 2007, but Dominic Raab has repeatedly and strenuously dismissed the allegations as false and sued the newspaper that published the claims in 2011 for libel, but his ally Maria Miller, a fellow MP, said the allegations were brought vexatiously.

Maria Miller implied he may have been “forced into” signing the non-disclosure deal because it was “used to try to allow the case to be settled.”
Yet Dominic Raab is refusing to willingly pull out of the agreement.

buzzfeed_news.17987faf8072e04e0ae4e68ff2f7de1d.png

Furthermore, according to BuzzFeed News, Dominic Raab’s legal team e-mailed the woman concerned in 2011 warning of “consequences” if she breached the agreement, and a spokesperson for Dominic Raab told BuzzFeed News: “The right time for the confidentiality obligations to be lifted on both sides for a fair and balanced airing of the dispute was before the court back in 2012.”

Theresa May is finally trying to get a legacy, and it’s about climate change, and it appears that at the moment she’s the lame duck Prime Minister, and she’s attempting to kick-start a legally binding plan for the UK to have zero carbon emissions by 2050.

The Government is setting out legislation to establish a new binding target to cut emissions. The statutory instrument will amend the current goal to cut climate pollution by 80 per cent by 2050, which was agreed by MPs under the Climate Change Act in 2008.

Hitting net zero, a 100 per cent cut in emissions will mean an end to heating of homes with conventional gas boilers, more green electricity, and a switch from petrol and diesel cars to electric vehicles, walking and cycling.

It could require people to consume less meat and dairy and take fewer flights, and any residual pollution in 2050, from aircraft, for instance, will need to be offset through measures to cut carbon such as planting trees.

Sajid Javid, the home secretary, has described himself as the change candidate in the Conservative leadership election, dismissing Boris Johnson, the favourite, as “yesterday’s news”.

At a launch event where he emphasised his upbringing as the son of immigrant parents and the contrast with his more vested competitors, he said the Tories needed a “new kind of leadership from a new kind of leader”. Asked how he differed from Boris Johnson, Javid said:

I’m a change candidate. Boris Johnson is yesterday’s news.

He’s been around in politics for a while, he’s achieved a lot, he’s still got a big role to play, but I think if we are trying to connect with the next generation and move forward as a country then I think it’s time for the next generation with a bold new agenda.

What I can do in terms of the policies, I think being able to articulate the policies, it’s not just about articulating that core message – I think the messenger makes a real difference as well.

Javid insisted his background as a leading international banker gave him the expertise required to achieve a Brexit deal. Asked how he would be able to agree on a deal, he said:

When I look at my own experience of doing deals – big international deals in the 19, 20-year career I had before I came into politics – I started at the bottom of the finance industry and finished towards the top, and that was because I built a reputation of doing many multibillion-dollar deals, including some of the largest financing and bond transactions the world had ever seen. And they weren’t easy. They weren’t straightforward. They were all involving negotiation, involving competition to win the deals.

So, while I think no one has got perfect experience to deliver Brexit because no one has done anything like it before, I think with that experience that I’ve got outside government and the experience I’ve got in government … I think I’m in a very good position to get a good Brexit deal for the United Kingdom.

Conservative leadership hopefuls including Boris Johnson hoping to push through a “deal or no deal” Brexit in October have been given a boost after MPs defeated a Labour-led struggle to begin legislation to prevent the UK leaving the EU without an agreement.

But Philip Hammond stated that Boris Johnson’s Brexit plan was unlikely as the UK wouldn’t be able to leave the EU with a deal or with a deal by the end of October, and the Conservative leadership hopeful Esther McVey has spent thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money claiming for a personal photographer on expenses.

queen-elizabeth-ii-arrives-at-the-queen-elizabeth-ii-news-photo-522576542-1560625088.jpg

And why does the Queen allow the Tory party to only act in the interest of themselves when they should be acting in the interest of the country?

Forget what side of the Brexit debate you’re on, the fact is that the prevailing party in government aren’t legislating for the prosperity of society, nor are they even purporting to act in the interest of its people, and they’re merely concerned with their own survival, and any pretence at good governance has gone by the wayside.

And any attempt at mitigating the whirlpool of events beyond Brexit, about shaping and familiarising our political future is just backgrounded noise, and any endeavour to address the harsh dilemmas confronting this country within has simply ground to a standstill.

And worse than that, those government ministers such as Michael Gove now actively ignore the truth, and he’s attempted to allege that racially motivated brutality has not risen, and to put it in simple terms, the government has stopped governing.

We are a nation that has been decapitated, and the only concern our government has is with their future and not ours.

Violent crime has risen by 19 per cent in the last year. Life expectancy has declined by 13 months for men and 14 months for women, and five million people are now in precarious and low paid work.

The amount of children in absolute poverty has increased by 200,000 in 17/18, and the number of pensioners in relative poverty rose in the same period from 17 per cent to 18 per cent.

Literacy is falling too, and to such an extent that it’s predicted that by 2030 we will have dropped four places on the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) index.

open-graph.1f08616cf436.png

Forty-four NHS hospitals are in deficit, and this increases to 90 per cent of acute treatment centres, and all of this is happening right now, in front of our very eyes and yet we haven’t even started to scratch the surface of the difficulties plaguing us, yet our government are not prepared to do anything about it.

Our government are actually showing no leadership or moral backbone when it comes to tackling the growing problems facing ordinary people from every class. Instead, they’re more involved in finding a new leader and delivering a Brexit with no actual benefits.

So, back to the original question, why does the Queen permit this state of affairs to continue? And how can she sit idly by while her government literally play games with themselves rather than actually govern?

How much longer can this country survive this assault on its very being before the Queen stands up and says enough is enough, you have failed? The problem is, as the Head of State, the Queen has to remain stringently neutral with respect to political matters, and her only role involves ceremonial and formal functions in relationship to the government of the UK.

The Queen has the power to create governments, and the Queen has before utilised the authority to dissolve Parliament and call a general election, but the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act put an end to that in 2011, and now a two-thirds vote in the commons is required to dissolve Parliament before a five-year fixed-term is up.

Can the Queen of England dismiss the Prime Minister? She can because her Majesty Queen Elizabeth is the one who actually appoints the Prime Minister, so technically she could ignore a General Election, and further has the ability to dismiss the Prime Minister, who serves at her pleasure because the Prime Minister is simply that, the prime or most important minister that the monarch has.

The Queen, however, holds no political power, but she still has a powerful pull over British society.

Here’s What You’ll Be Charged

During his hotly-protested state visit to the United Kingdom, US President Donald Trump let slide his intentions for the NHS. He revealed that the privatisation of Britain’s publicly funded health service would be “on the table” during post-Brexit trade talks.

Both Conservative and Brexit Party officials have shown their backing for a privatised NHS. Meanwhile, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn announced mighty disapproval to the President, but here’s what healthcare could cost you if Jeremy Corbyn’s warning goes unheeded.

And according to the most up-to-date Milliman Medical Index, the most popular health plan offered by employers to a typical American family of four costs an average £22,163 per year.

These costs are so astronomical, most people just can’t afford them. So on average, employers pick up over 70 per cent of the bill (based on 2016 figures). This means that if a person loses their job, they and their family also lose access to healthcare.

Without insurance, here are the costs for common services:

Screenshot-2019-06-05-at-12.20.42.png

*childbirth data via The Economist

Countless Brits further rely on the NHS for mental health services, but a recent case from the US is a reason for caution.

A 21-year-old needed a week-long stay in an Oklahoma hospital after attempting suicide, he was charged over $93,000 (£73,000). He shared his bill on social media, only to discover countless others with comparable issues.

He was charged over $93,000 (£73,000). He shared his bill on social media, only to find many others with similar issues.

But why is the NHS in crisis? Well, the explanation is simple. The government chose to underfund the service, rendering it with limited money than is needed. Hoping that people will feel let down by their services and in the end plead to go private, or our government will say, “Well, if you’re not happy with it…”

But what makes it even more bizarre is that the NHS is totally affordable. The UK has a GDP, the amount of wealth we produce each year of over £2 trillion a year, the NHS only costs about £150 billion, but right now, the NHS is suffering by a crisis that’s being fabricated by those endeavouring to benefit from its decline, enabling politicians and the media to scapegoat patients, staff, and the concept of the NHS itself, rather than taking accountability for a crisis of their own making.

Some argue we can’t afford to keep the NHS. The fact is, we can’t afford not to.

Make no mistake, Donald Trump didn’t come to visit England to commemorate the D-Day celebrations, Donald Trump has set his sights on our National Health Service, and the ridiculous thing is, our government are going to let him, and the US big pharma, which bankrolls the Republican Party, view the NHS as a barely exploited goldmine as the Tories lay it open to more and more private ownership.

And how tempting would it be as our government unravels to offer up the glittering prize of the NHS for protecting our Brexit bacon? No wonder Theresa May refused point blank to ensure protection for the NHS back in February during any bilateral trade talks with the US.

In May, Donald Trump condemned high US drug prices on “freeloading” countries that used their haggling power to force US pharmaceutical firms into giving them pills and medications at low cost, and the US health secretary Alex Azar has declared they would use trade agreements to put restraint on nations with “socialised” health care systems.

Donald Trump intentionally misinterpreted the huge UK demonstrations in support of the NHS during the winter crisis, tweeting that “the Democrats are pushing for universal health care while thousands of people are marching in the UK because their [universal coverage] system is going broke and not working.”

People were, of course, marching for more funding and support for the NHS, not to get rid of it and set up private health care, which would leave millions of people with no health insurance, as it does in the United States, and also keeps the US life expectancy below the UK’s.

And it’s not only the NHS that faces this threat, but it also affects all of our public services. The more the Tories lay them open to competitive privatisation and corporate takeover, the more danger they’re in from any bilateral agreement with Donald Trump.

And never mind chlorine-washed chickens, these dastardly rules cover everything from animal welfare to chemicals to the import of crops for biofuel, and we might assume that these rules are basic protection for us, animals and the planet, but the US simply believe that they needlessly restrict trade.

Even our Cornish pasties and Stilton cheese are in danger, as the US wants us to abandon those troublesome EU rules around the geographical origins of specific foods, and I’m sure that many would march against Donald Trump any day of the week for the Mexican children he has cages, some of whom, following their long separation, can no longer remember their parents.

His politics are wicked and discriminatory, along with his pussy-grabbing ethnocentricity, climate change dissent and his hate-filled agenda, and that’s what Donald Trump stands for, and even if you take the view that those things are none of our business, you should at least realise that Donald Trump wasn’t here in England for the heatwave or a nice cup of tea, he was here for the most lucrative thing, our NHS, and if there’s one reason to Remain in the EU, it’s so that Donald Trump doesn’t get his grimy little hands on our NHS.

If Donald Trump does get his hands on our NHS, it will simply show how weak our government is, and how quickly it will hand over control to this US puppet master, and those that can afford private healthcare, that’s excellent, adios and pay for your private healthcare, but there are millions in the United Kingdom that would never be able to afford to.

Since Aneurin Bevan pushed for the NHS to become a reality in 1948 it has saved millions of lives and improved countless millions more that would never have had access to health care otherwise, and this man would be turning in his grave right about now because the NHS is our national treasure that needs to be preserved at all costs, because without it, health care equality would be lost, taking with it, the lives of those who can’t afford to pay for private healthcare.

Shocking Facts About Bovine Growth Hormone

Since bovine growth hormone obtained FDA approval in 1993, three troubling health trends have developed. Cancer cases continue to grow, obesity has become an epidemic and early onset puberty has become the norm. Related? Perhaps, perhaps not.

You can be the authority on this as you read through the following truths about the substance known as BGH, or rBGH, but whatever judgment you come to, you’ll probably agree that keeping this substance far away from you and your family is good practice.

Bovine Growth Hormone is a GMO, and Monsanto created rBGH to stimulate milk production in cows, well, that’s a subtle way of putting it.

Bovine growth hormone occurs naturally in cows, the same way human growth hormone occurs naturally in humans, but to make it more effective Monsanto genetically modified BGH to create recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone, or rBGH or rBST (recombinant bovine somatotropin).

This more potent GMO version of BGH is not a naturally occurring substance and does more than increase old Bessie’s milk production, and it was banned in the European Union and around the world, although it was originally approved by numerous countries soon after its release.

rBGH has since been banned by the European Union, Canada, Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Israel, and most of these prohibitions went into force in 2000, some earlier, and it didn’t take their scientists long to figure out that this stuff isn’t quite right.

235470._UY630_SR1200,630_.jpg

Medical experts claimed it unsafe, and in 2007, Dr Samuel Epstein exposed the dangers of rBGH in his book, “What’s in your milk?”.

This book reveals the science, politics, and corporate greed behind the creation and approval of rBGH. Since then, numerous milk farmers have chosen to sell only rBGH-free milk, and Monsanto sold its rBGH business unit to Eli Lilly, but don’t be deceived, it’s still out there and expected to remain out there and in the food supply chain until a complete prohibition is set.

Milk from cows treated with rBGH contains greater levels of IGF-1, and the American Cancer Society reported early investigations linked IGF-1 as a contributor to tumour development, particularly breast, prostate and colorectal cancers, and while investigation has not clarified the connection, continuing efforts support these investigations.

Insulin-like growth factor has an abundance of problems, and a published scientific study centred on the relationship of IGF-1 (and IGF-2) to breast cancer tumour development.

These insulin growth factors are known to spur cell differentiation, and it seems IGFs have a bizarre interplay with estrogen which may contribute to tumour development in women.

A 2013 study assessed the relationship between IFG and prostate cancer. Little if any IGF was seen in healthy prostate tissue, and advanced tumours confirmed a high presence of IGF-1, while smaller localized prostate cancer tumours exhibited a lesser quantity of IGF-1. Ultimately the investigation concluded greater concentrations of IGF-1 do have a correlation to the presence of prostate cancer.

Like prostate cancer, advanced colorectal cancers have shown a direct correlation with higher levels of IGF-1, and one particular study confirmed higher levels in men, patients over 60 and those with cancers originating from damage to the mucus layer of the colon, and researchers discovered IGF-1 levels can indicate and further identify the presence of colorectal cancers.

Although not one of the original cancers connected to insulin-like growth factor, research from China had discovered that IGF-1 plays a vital part in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer cases in the study had much higher blood serum levels of IGF-1 than the control group.

And while this research was relatively new, it did imply that IGF-1 might play a larger role in cancers than earlier thought, and it further increases additional concerns and issues about the role of increased consumption of IGF as a consequence of genetically modified cows.

FDA and Monsanto scientists determined the rBGH used on cows wouldn’t transfer or harm humans, particularly through milk. They further said that bovine growth hormone wouldn’t harm humans even if ingested, but a case documented in 2011 implies otherwise.

A 33-year-old man found himself in the ER describing a variety of symptoms including nausea, headaches, blurry vision, and more. In the course of the examination, the patient admitted taking anabolic steroids, which included bovine growth hormone.

Evidently, bodybuilders know something more about the impact of bovine growth hormone on humans than government and corporate researchers, as a consequence of the use, this man started a new life with diabetes, and while this was a pretty unusual case, it does confirm that bovine growth hormone whether introduced through milk, which we were assured it wouldn’t be, or through other means can have dangerous impacts on human health.

Cows given rBGH are more prone to develop mastitis, swelling and infection of mammary tissue, and early investigations discovered this led to bacteria and possible pus in milk, and while laws banned the distribution of tainted milk, the plain fact is that milk from cows treated with rBGH are more inclined to suffer contamination than others, and this is why the European Union and other countries banned it.

rBGH also causes an extensive array of health problems for cows, necessitating the use of antibiotics. Fortuitously, most farmers label their milk, so it is easy to obtain non-rBGH/rBST milk. Of course, the simplest way is to purchase organic or raw. Better yet, choose organic goat’s milk.

Whether you believe this or not, messing with hormones is very dangerous… period!

But infertility and sterility in young boys and men have been linked to hormone injections into cows, and have you watched what these injections do to the animals? But birth control is the actual issue here and how to keep a population down without calling it genocide.

Sixteen Year Old Hailed For Her Eloquent, Wounding Brexit Verdict

A 16-year-old audience member on the BBC’s Question Time has been praised for her harsh, articulate opinion on the Brexit chaos, and the young woman managed to sum up the UK’s dilemma more distinctly than most MPs, journalists and observers put together.

Speaking on the flagship debate show in Belfast, she said: David Cameron made the referendum policy because he didn’t want to risk losing 10 or 15 seats to UKIP.

But this has always been because Tories are playing party politics with issues that are going to be enormous generational changes for us all.

This young girl didn’t get a say in Brexit and she won’t get a say in it, because there’s not going to be a second referendum on it as it stands, but either way what we have to face isn’t an issue of parties coming together, because this isn’t a result of direct democracy.

And it all comes back to a party putting itself before the country it’s trying to govern, and she advised an additional extension and a general election to seek the representative democracy, this country was built on.

Her criticisms were extensively greeted on Twitter where users said she was exceptionally articulate and called for her to be made Prime Minister.

Sally Themans wrote: That she was brilliant. We should be listening to our amazing youth, and this young lady makes more sense than any politician in the past two years, and she’s a stunningly articulate young lady that could teach the government a thing or two.

Another Twitter user, James, wrote: “I showed the clip to my nan and she started to cry and said ‘This young lady is so spot on, I just wish the rest of my generation and the one after me would listen to the young more. They are our future’.”

This young lady should certainly get a say in Brexit, and many others like her because this country is their future, and much more politically knowledgeable than the ordinary Joe Bloggs.

This young lady is correct in every word that she says. The Tories have been putting themselves before their country and their people, and it’s a disgrace to British democracy, but then the Labour party hasn’t done much to help, they’ve also been putting their party before the country.

This lady is the honesty of youth, maybe we can bring her in and throw all the rest out and let her manage her own party of MP’s.

This young lady has more knowledge and understanding, and an undeniable right to speak about the European Union, she was expressive and wise, and she merits some admiration for having spoken out.

We’re in a mess because of campaign lies, going back many years about the European Union, from the right-wing press and none of our politicians had the boldness to stand up to them and take them to task, and this could have all been circumvented by the simple expedient of ensuring that the people were acquainted with the truth.

Of course, the Tories rely on right-wing media to do much of their campaigning for them, as well as the extremely rich, the only beneficiaries of Brexit who bankroll them, and why should we trust people that tell us lies, and we’ve gone along with this aberration for three years and we’re getting exactly what was promised, total anarchy.

And Remainers have just been ridiculed and maligned against, and it’s time for this insanity to end, and if this can’t be done with an agreed deal, then we have to have a second referendum or revoke Article 50.

This is a young lady that’s hit the nail on its head, so why can’t grown up people understand what’s going on, and this is a young lady that’s put an articulate debate across in an adult manner which should be cheered, and another referendum would give us all a second chance to vote knowing what we now know.

The problem with revoking Article 50 is it would have to pass through parliament, as it’s a process that has to be agreed by voting, and it would take at least another year, maybe more, and we don’t have that extravagance of time.

This young lady gives hope for the future, and such a change from the so-called lying, self-important politicians, and the younger generation has to deal with this because the older generation would rather things went back to how they were before immigration, and don’t really care how it affects them because they won’t be here much longer.

I feel pretty sorry for the younger generation because they’re getting shafted and it’s not right, and all in the name of greed, but then people have been getting shafted for centuries.

Every generation gets shafted, and this young lady isn’t going to be any different, due to the distortions and self-interest of the ones who shaft people, and the biggest shafter was Tony Blair, starting a war that no one agreed with.

And finally, if she ever gets to be a politician, then it will be her turn to shaft people for her own self-interest because she won’t be any different to anyone else.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: