THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

 

Police are hunting for the bucket bomber who sought to blow up a rush-hour Tube train amid allegations the terror suspect is furnished with knives and may have left other devices. The rudimentary device could have killed dozens but failed to correctly explode and hurled a wall of fire throughout the carriage wounding at least 22 people including a ten-year-old boy.

Terrified commuters were seen cloaked in blood with scorched hands, legs, faces and hair, others sustained crush injuries throughout a human stampede as they scrambled for their lives at Parsons Green station in west London at 8.20am.

Pictures reveal what experts consider is a rather unsophisticated explosive in a flaming white container inside a Lidl freezer bag with Christmas lights distending out of the top, a kind of detonator supported by ISIS in its online manuals and magazines.

Security specialists have stated the IED had a timer, indicating the bucket bomber left it on the train and bolted before it exploded.

Eyewitnesses said there was a deafening blast, a flash and suddenly a ball of flame engulfed surrounding travellers on the jammed District Line train.

Scotland Yard said it was a terror strike but could not verify claims there is another device and the suspect is on the run but an officer at the scene informed the media that they think there is a second bomb and that there is a man with knives on the loose.

A Witness said he saw a lady with no skin on her legs and a ten-year-old boy with a charred body. He said the explosion was similar to a huge match going off at the end of the carriage and people just began rushing. It was every man for himself when that happened and the burn victims had severe leg wounds.

It was a pretty hectic commuter train, young and old, school children going to their schools. Nannies attempting to look for children, because of the rush of people simply taking five and six-year-olds away from them and they were attempting to look for them.

In the aftermath, armed police swooped from the SO-15 counter-terrorism unit conducted a hard-stop on a bus in nearby Chelsea Bridge Road. The call was associated with the terror attack but nothing suspicious was discovered on board.

Prime Minister Theresa May was to chair a meeting of the Government’s Cobra emergencies committee to address the terrorist strike, the fifth major British terror strike this year and Armed Police, paramedics and firefighters were all said to be at the west London station inside five minutes of the blast.

A hundred metre cordon was established around the station and a police helicopter was also overhead.

A witness said he observed a female with the skin of both her legs burned away entirely by the fire. He further alleges a ten-year-old boy endured wounds and everybody had comparable wounds to their faces and hair.

He stated that there was a flash at the end of the carriage that came down the train and that there was a really sharp burning stench that came out of the carriage.

There was a girl who had no skin on her leg, whatever she had been covering her was simply gone and there was a 10-year-old boy who had burns to his ankle. There was another girl whose back garment was gone and her hair was gone.

There were loads of injuries from people being trampled on and everyone who had been adjacent to it had the same burns to their head.

They heard the first outcry and then stared down and witnessed a flash and then the smoke and people fleeing. It was total confusion, total panic and people were yelling that he had a knife.

When people began fleeing there was then the odour of charred people and there were more than 30 people wounded. It was a full carriage and everyone had something wrong with them. It was a human stampede after the explosive went off.

There were loads of outcries and people calling to other to run and then there was a human stampede, down the stairs and there were people lying there getting crushed, a big human pile-on. There were several crush injuries on the stairs. People got crushed going down the stairs but Police evacuated everyone from the scene rather fast.

There was screaming, shoving and pushing, it was a like there was a terrorist on the loose with a gun and many people were in tears but when it was all finished lots of people were being supported and attended. It was a complete uncontrolled frenzy.

A woman who had been on the same carriage as the device described it going off, like a whiff of smoke and flames coming out of it.

There were screaming and rushing, and there was a stampede of the stairs and people were falling over, there was a lad being hoisted up after he had fallen down, he was in his school attire, and he must have been about ten, he was yelling and distressed.

A Fulham fitness instructor who was in the next carriage the instant the charge went off, he told the media that he had never witnessed anything like it, it was like something out of a movie. He believed it was an acid attack. And it happened like bang inside ten seconds, he simply wanted to run.

He went towards the carriage where the charge went off and a lady said you don’t want to go in there. He observed a tiny boy with cuts on his face yelling for his brother. A woman was bleeding. Everyone was running and he’d never observed anything like it.

People sustained burns from the blast and others were wounded in the crush as people fled and they were literally about two minutes from Parsons Green when the train abruptly stopped.

He observed people running on the track in the opposite direction towards Fulham Broadway, he could hear no outcries but a lot of people running and they had been detained at the station for at least half an hour. It was pretty hectic, with a lot of police around and police dogs.

At the scene, dozens of police and ambulances continued to be summoned into the cordoned zone, however, it was not known at that stage how many people had been injured and Specialist armed anti-terror units also swamped the area.

Another witness, who was on the train, said he noticed a device in the far carriage. It was a white bucket, a builder’s bucket, in a white Aldi bag or Lidl bag and that flames were still coming out of it when he noticed it and that it had a bunch of wires hanging out of it.

Somebody else from Southfields, near Wimbledon, was about 10 metres from the source of the blast when fire filled the carriage. He heard a blast and when he looked there were flames all around.

People began running but it was fortunate that the train was stopping at Parsons Green as the door began to open as he described the scene of frenzy as passengers fought to escape the carriage, falling and shoving each other and this bystander waited back to take a closer glimpse at what he considered was the cause of the blast.

British police Saturday stormed a house in a London neighbourhood that belongs to an elderly couple acknowledged for their work with child refugees as part of the fast-moving inquiry into London’s tube attack that wounded numerous people.

The home is registered to Ronald Jones, 88, and his 71-year-old wife, Penelope, who has been honoured by the Monarch following taking charge of 268 foster kids.

Neighbours reported that the couple has six children of their own and had begun taking foster kids after seeing the predicament of refugees uprooted from Syria and abroad and the captured teen was assumed to be a foster kid taken in by Ronald Jones and his wife.

The extensive exploration at the home in Sunbury-on-Thames, approximately five miles from London’s Heathrow Airport follows the rather important capture of an 18-year-old in Dover.

Police showed up at the home, which is in Surrey, and decreed an urgent removal of adjacent homes. A neighbour, who lives near the house being explored, stated police gave her one minute to assemble stuff before leaving.

She was in her home with her kids and there was a thump at the door from the police. They ordered her to leave and they announced that she had one minute to get out of the house and get away. She simply collected some stuff and her kids and just got out.

Some neighbours were crying and several stated they had no idea when they would be able to return to their homes but the Police gave several shelter and food at a nearby sports club.

Police did not report details about the search, but the precautions hinted concern that there might be explosives or violent fanatics on the property. The Islamic State group has claimed one of its members planted the explosive.

Police maintained the teen was apprehended by Kent police in the port section of Dover on the English Channel and the suspect was being held for questioning under the Terrorism Act. He has not been charged or identified. Police have not said if he was suspected of planting the bomb or if he played a supporting role in a possible plot.

Hundreds of officers were investigating surveillance footage and carrying out other inquiries as the country raised its terrorism alert system to the highest level.

Authorities said the suspect carried a white bucket containing an explosive onto the rush-hour train. When it exploded, many train passengers sustained burns, and others were wounded as they raced away from the field of the blast.

None of the injuries were thought to be life-threatening and The Islamic State group claimed accountability for the assault, which it announced was carried out by an affiliated member.

In the meantime, President Donald Trump took ferocity from British authorities for a tweet he posted in the wake of the strike that appeared to reprimand Britain’s security units.

The president tweeted that it was another assault on London by a loser rebel. That it was caused by sick and deranged people who were already in the sights of Scotland Yard, and that Scotland Yard should have been more proactive.

However, it’s never helpful for anybody to meditate on what is going on, particularly in an ongoing investigation and previous to the suspect’s apprehension, London was on edge.

Photographs from cameras inside the subway car revealed that the device was contained in a container with wires dangling out of it and that it was hidden in a plastic shopping bag and officials have suggested that more than one person may have been involved.

Increasing the threat level to its highest position was a proportionate and practical measure and police have called on the people to be observant.

The explosive went off about 8:20 a.m local time, as the train, transporting passengers from the suburbs including countless school children, was at Parsons Green station in the southwest of the city.

The station was reopened Saturday, returning some normalcy to London’s transport interface after a day of severe confusion. There was no indication of fear amongst Londoners and the weekend life of the city proceeded undeterred by the increased threat level.

The charge was meant to do serious injury to passengers and the injuries would have been considerably worse had the whole thing exploded and these men, women and children were very fortunate with this one. It could have certainly become much more serious.

Britain has faced four other assaults this year, which have killed a sum of 36 people. The other strikes in London near Parliament, on London Bridge and near a mosque in Finsbury Park in north London employed vehicles and knives.

In addition, a suicide bomber struck a crowded concert arena in Manchester in northern England, murdering 22 people and that assault in May also temporarily generated the threat level to be set at critical.

London Metropolitan police arrested a sixth suspect in the latest Underground train bombing in the early hours of Thursday morning.
After serving a warrant at a home in Thornton Heath, police apprehended a 17-year-old male suspect under section 41 of the Terrorism Act and launched a search of the home.

The arrest follows less than a day after a 48-year-old man and a 30-year-old man were captured in Newport, South Wales when police executed a warrant at the address where the two men were discovered. A 25-year-old man was detained, also in Newport, at a separate location.

A 21-year-old man was detained in Hounslow, an area in West London, by detectives with the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, and earlier police had evacuated a home in a London suburb as well as part of the Port of Dover after arresting an 18-year-old man that morning in the southeastern coastal port.

However, none of the six men who have been arrested in connection with the attack has been openly identified. All remain in custody at a South London police station.

Thirty people were wounded in the September 15 attack on a train at Parsons Green Underground station in London. Police stated an apparent bucket bomb exploded during the Friday morning commute, wounding 30 people.

All of the injuries were deemed minor and authorities said the bomb did not completely discharge, possibly narrowing a number of casualties and the terror threat was reduced to severe from critical over the weekend, but police suggested the public should continue to be alert.

This remains to be a fast-moving investigation and a significant volume of activity has taken place following the attack. However, Conspiracy Theorists expose that the London Tube bombardment was a fictitious flag and despite the so-called Islamic State taking credit for the assault, conspiracy speculators on Twitter have now started to insist the bombardment was a fraudulent flag performance devised to promote Theresa May’s notoriety.

So, what proof do they have to make such a declaration? Not a lot, but it’s not stopped these people dancing to absurd judgments before. More specifically, shoes left on the Parsons Green platform, which one conspiracy speculator claims is the tell-tale indication of a fraudulent flag operation.

Later another photo, this time from the Westminster Bridge assault which took place earlier this year, which further confirms a discarded pair of shoes, with the caption:

Remember the #westminster #falseflag ? More shoes placed neatly on the pavement.

Furthermore, there are more people who think fake flags are always expressed by discarded shoes and one user claims the shoes left behind after the death of Jo Cox, by Thomas Mair, were evidence her death was also a fraudulent flag operation and different people have maintained those wounded in the explosion are really crisis actors who’ve been paid to fake their injuries.

They’ve no confirmation of this but why let facts get in the way of a crazy idea?

Nevertheless, if you look at images of the bucket bomb there’s no white, no smoke and there is zero damage, and the most hogwash about this is, you have Theresa May criticising Donald Trump and what’s ironic is Donald Trump was saying that the internet was being utilised to make terrorist strikes accessible.

Presumably, a bomb went off in this container and there’s no smoke. They believe that we’re dumb because they fill us with this constant formation of defecation all day long and they manipulate us like we’re stupid, they can say white is black and they know people are going to accept it as true.

You’ve got Theresa May who is upset at Donald Trump for saying the same poop as she said about controlling the internet. The government have been kissing arse from Israel and England. We just did an unprecedented weapons agreement with Saudi Arabia who assisted Bin Laden.

The government don’t consider the people, you’ve got Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Theresa May and what they want to do is control the internet and they want to make certain that the first amendment and this is probably the ultimate battleground for the first amendment, the internet and they’re going to try and slaughter that and that’s what they’re using.

They have to use this and this is what they’re doing for it, destroying our freedom and it’s amusing that instantly people criticise ISIS. Well, ISIS is a carpet statement, it’s a carpet attack.

As people could view, it was in a plastic container sitting in a carrier bag and we’ve been informed by the media through eyewitnesses who alleged that there was a fireball and that people were getting burnt. Simply use your evaluative reasoning abilities, if this object that we’re viewing created a fireball which wounded 20 or so people, what’s clear about this image?

Where’s the wreckage nearby to this assumed bomb? And why has that seat next to it not got more damage? Why is the carrier bag still sitting there, not even melted?

There is no evidence whatsoever that this, what we’re seeing generated a fireball, which became lethal and people were injured. It an utter farce and once again people are going to accept it because it’s on the television or because it’s in the newspaper.

Now once again you’ve got the usual BBC news presenters which just happened to be there on the scene.

What must be shared is something that must be taken into reckoning and a man claimed, that it was all over the news, that he was there and he is a media technology consultant, therefore let’s have a look at who this gentleman is.

This gentleman is connected to BSA’s art programme and one of the projects that they develop is a communication gateway product for public safety which addresses the market of public safety organisations and who are the public safety organisations? The ambulance, police, hospitals et cetera.

They photo-type which is actively employed in public safety operations, they discuss in another active full demonstration that took place with assistance from the ESA and involved active simulating medical patients alongside technical staff and medical staff.

They endeavour to highlight the possible advantages of satellite-based communications for healthcare systems utilising the delta system which is a crisis telemedicine system for dangerous situations created to enhance control of rescue and first aid and emergency assistance in the context such as explosions.

The system permits mobile paramedics and units to organise medical care towards victims and the presentation outlines focus on the strength of the satellite system to give speedy emergency services.

It was an experiment and goes on to enumerate all of the advantages, medical and logistic coordination, audio communications with mobile teams. Therefore, we can see it’s a drill and it’s been given away, courtesy of the very person who was involved in this scheme.

So, thank you to this gentleman for conserving us a bunch of time and headache and revealing to us who was exactly involved and of course, those in control are going to use it to facilitate their agenda’s, and already we’ve got Donald Trump tweeting that the internet is the recruitment intermediary and clearly they’re going to have to clamp down on that.

I’ll now focus on Emma Stevie’s story of what allegedly transpired and what she said on the day that it occurred which was broadcast a lot during the day.

She stated that she had got on the train and inside five seconds the doors were closing and she just heard the loudest scariest outcries coming from what appeared to be the carriage right next to them and loud men yelling to run, so when people yell run you simply run so everybody simply ran for their lives.

She didn’t know why, she didn’t hear an explosion and she imagined acid had been thrown around, so she didn’t even know she was running, she was simply running because she listened to men telling her to do so.

She and everybody to got the steps and it was like the worst, a proper human crush that everybody got stuck in and there were women underneath her and there was a woman saying she was pregnant, there was a little boy, his face had got smacked into the step and she was gripping onto the railing in a fetal position trying not to put her weight on anyone and there were simply layers and layers of people yelling.

She stated that it was very traumatic and they didn’t know why they were running and she imagined perhaps it was all a huge misunderstanding or that someone’s phone had exploded in their pocket and she was so fortunate that she wasn’t hurt and she had put trainers on that morning and she was so fortunate that she wasn’t the women two layers underneath her.

I’d feel blessed to if I wasn’t being crushed by her. So, shes describing standing on top of two women underneath her and she feels fortunate she’s not them and she’s moderately clear there being two women, but first, she says a woman and then she states, women.

Anybody that doesn’t know Parsons Green station, it’s a really small station with one staircase that comes from the platform, but then shes on Goodmorning Britain and her description is slightly altered when she was questioned about where she was when the bomb went off.

She stated she was in the carriage next to what was going on, then she heard very loud screams and they were attempting to get the doors open because nobody knew what was going on and they heard men now yelling to run at the top of their voices and everybody simply piled out of the train and rushed towards the stairs where there was a huge pile up.

She said it was terrible and she couldn’t get out of her mind seeing this little boy, he got totally squashed by numerous people and she was so fortunate and that she was standing against the wall, putting all her weight on the wall, but before she stated she was in a fetal position, therefore obviously she wasn’t upright.

She said it was horrible simply being trapped and then the interviewer responded that there was a period where a gentleman simply said for everybody to calm down and it appeared to have an amazingly comforting impact on everybody and suddenly it appeared to become a somewhat British orderly line, queuing up to depart the station and then she was questioned if that was what occurred, and she stated that she was really focused on her immediate surroundings and she said she was underneath two people.

Wow, now shes underneath two people, whereas before she was standing up next the wall and she said there were three women that she could see underneath her, therefore presently we have gone from two women underneath her and now there are three. Well, either she can’t add up, or she’s in terrible need of some spectacles.

Then there’s the girl who was taken away in the pink coat with a dressing around her head and if you examine it closely, what looks like blood, doesn’t really look like blood, not that I’m saying that it’s not, but just take a closer look.

Then she’s seen as she’s taken away by a policewoman, the policewoman is wearing jeans, now is that allowed?

The bucket was assumed to have exploded, can you detect any melting going on there in the picture? The bucket is still totally intact, but this was apparently an incendiary device but nothing around it, look at the bucket, no charring, no smoke, no nothing, it’s simply a bucket on fire.

If you look at the surrounding, it if had been an explosion, there would be residue on the walls, there would be some sort of debris around and people wouldn’t be stood taking photos of it.

Supposedly, police do not tax, MOT, or insure their vehicles. On the recent London bombing, this alleged police car was apparently on loan from a company supplying props for film and TV.

People were in total and absolute confusion as the commotion unrolled before their very eyes. As such they never thought to examine the story being fed to them. That was a foolish blunder and looking back now the dust has settled it’s plain to see that at worst this is supposedly a false flag terrorist assault and that at best we’re not being told the complete truth or complete account about what has transpired.

There are two fundamental photos that give the entire narrative away, first and foremost is a photograph and video footage of the bomb itself. As you can see from the photo we were informed that the bomb had created a tremendous fireball to tear through the carriage though it is blatantly apparent that there is little or no destruction of the encompassing region.

We see no black burn or contaminated material on the train, even the handbag which was assembled pretty near to the device remained in great form. It was further stated that there were flames all around, people were drenched in blood, the device had loads of wires dangling from it and people were crying, yelling and diving over each other according to the media.

Yet again, this entirely differs everything the general populace saw through the media. The image and video footage that was bestowed to us on TV seem to be at differences with the official account that is being furnished to us.

The actual nail in the coffin moment was when a picture video footage of a young female with a dressing around her head, as you will see from the photograph, the young female is wearing a white blouse, there is no fire damage to the blouse in fact it seems pretty much in pristine condition particularly considering a fireball was proposed to have engulfed the train that she was on.

Considering that this young lady has just experienced and been witness to an amazingly traumatic event shes looking amazingly well.

Numerous people have trouble believing our government could be behind such an appalling attack. You may be questioning yourself, why would the government plan such an attack and what would be the goal? Clearly, we don’t have the answer, but we can guess and conjecture.

Perhaps it’s so Theresa May has an easier time passing through additional snooper charter laws, maybe its to facilitate the global agenda to drive us into combat with other nations. Ultimately, we’ll never know, but what we can say for certain is that the government have been proven to head up false flag attacks before.

The plastic tub was undamaged, there were no signs of melting or soot residue, what seems like fairy lights and still working, allegedly having sent a huge fireball down the train that wounded over 20 people. Now we’re on a full-scale terror alert, whilst the Prime Minister prepares to control the internet and outlaw the freedom of speech.

With what resembles Christmas lights coming out of the bucket, it seems more like an arts and crafts prop. There’s also supposedly been footage and photo’s of peoples clothes that had been ripped by the blast, but then when you look, they are, cut straight edges.

Because of this apparently puzzling False Flag in a bucket, the equally embarrassing Theresa May has established part of Operation Chicken Tempura.

Plus, if the fireball had burnt the lady in pink’s cheek then surely her hair would have been burnt too?

A policewoman wearing jeans, well I was a little curious about this and emailed New Scotland Yard asking about clothing that the police use over a broad spectrum and was emailed back telling me that unfortunately at this current time we are unable to give out details regarding police uniforms.

So, some sort of blast occurred in one carriage causing partial injuries to some people in the region of that blast, burns, skin damage and what not. While others were injured in the confusion and the scrambling that happened after as people hurried off the train and out of the station.

There were no deaths detailed and the carriage itself was not significantly damaged. Yet, there are pictures that are circulating that implies that this was the explosive agent or what survived of it.

A bucket inside a Lidl’s shopping bag which was still on fire, but whatever caused this, it was not a high grade or especially complex bomb but this is presently being treated as a terror strike and within minutes people were on twitter trying to score points by calling it an Islamic terror attack as if jumping ahead of an investigation makes them clever.

But the mainstream media are starting to build their stories and make their speculations, getting their sources to acquaint the people and there are now things that don’t make sense, that are inconsistent and are simply unreliable and certain agendas are being expedited, especially by the news.

One reporter brought up the matter that this was a low-grade device and there was absolutely no conception of what it was made up of but they chose to infer it was Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP) and that this device hadn’t exploded correctly or that it was simply a cheap domestic explosive and that’s why there were no deaths and the carriage was not particularly damaged.

This correspondent then correlated this with 7/7, alleging that Hasib Hussain that blew up the number 30 bus had a comparable dilemma and this is why he didn’t blow up the tube carriage because he had to leave the carriage and revise his device and get a battery and then switched his target to the bus.

The problem with that is, there’s no proof to timeline of Hussain boarding the train and then leaving the train but we don’t know what his primary objective was simply that he ended up walking around, proceeding to a McDonald’s, he then went into a WH Smiths but before apparently boarding the bus, though no CCTV really reveals him mounting the bus or on the bus and no observers have reported him as being on that bus.

But the point is, the account isn’t determined, he may or may not have purchased a battery from WH Smiths, he may or may not have used that battery in a device that he may or may not have been struggling before switching to a target that he may or may not have been on.

This centre on TATP is further questionable because no TATP was retrieved from any of the 7/7 bus sights and the homemade peroxide mix that was discovered in a flat in Leeds was found to be inactive i.e, it was not explosive.

The investigators that examined it could not blow it up and in fact alleged bombers were not directly linked to the containers of that compound by forensics, just the flat overall. Therefore, the long story short, this uncertain incident being used on the news that this device was seemingly TATP like on 7/7 and was a bit of washout like Hasib Hussain’s bomb is allegedly nonsense.

The TATP conjecture was further questionable because TATP is not an exothermic explosive, for instance, it responds with very limited heat, it generates limited to no flames and is more similar to an energic bang of energy, with a bunch of smoke that can tear things apart but it’s not a bomb with a mushroom of flames or fire.

Therefore, this wouldn’t necessarily support all of the witness accounts coming out on how a huge sphere of fire came down the carriage and further that people were burned by the fire insinged and TATP can be utilized in a combination with other things, as part of a detonator but the general position is there is no need for the news to be speculating about the structure of this device and its only going to add to the sea of chaos.

The only thing we really do know was that this wasn’t a particularly powerful device but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it was intended on being a powerful device. The indications that it was handmade by an amateurish subversive but in not knowing who really did it, we can’t necessarily assume that it was a weak explosive through ineptitude.

The plan may have been more to alarm than to kill and it may have been intentionally low grade. This was an overground station with a lot of visibility and a lot of access and not an underground station, where the fall out would have been much worse.

Its further impressive have the apparently amateurish nature of the device which is compared with that of the Manchester bombing, which further looked too powerful for the story that everybody was told. That it was made by a college drop out through a youtube video and he built it all himself.

Yet, it did all this damage and it had remote discharge capabilities and people were associating it to IRA bombs, this doesn’t seem to make sense and if the self-taught, self-radicalized within the internet speculation is accurate then surely you’d expect smaller botched strikes or attacks that aren’t actually so powerful to be the norm and you’d presumably expect more of them to take place.

It could have been a meek self-taught, self-radicalised subversive or at least that’s what it could rationally be displayed as, we simply don’t know and again going back to the news coverage of this, which has further been concentrating on the so-called demand for more funding to the police and security services.

Apart from the fact that seemingly the security and intelligence services do a lot of dodgy and answerable things including supporting Islamic terrorism and if there is a person the decides that one day they want to make a makeshift device and attack people in public, there is really little that you can do to stop that, short of having some sort of mind-reading chip inside of each person in the country.

There is a point that we reach where there actually is nothing anybody can do and the focus should actually be on the response, not prevention and not an overreaching security state. We could actually simply walk out of our home and attack someone, that’s simply the nature of individual freedom.

We can’t get lost in the turmoil of these sorts of situations and then settle into parroting things like let’s give extra money to the police and M15, let’s simply thrust money at the situation as if that’s going to resolve it.

We require more police, wandering the streets with guns, do we? Are police with guns thought to prevent everyone with a Lidl’s shopping bag going to make a difference? That’s simply not how the system works, that’s simply not how a free society operates.

Also perhaps the best header out of this that illustrates the runaway agendas that are at work here, is this one:

London Tube Explosion, Donald Trump says Internet must be cut off to stop further terror attacks.

Reacting to the terror episode at Parson’s Green tube station, he stated that the internet was a terrorist recruiting tool and that loser terrorists must be dealt with in a much tougher manner.

That’s not actually how the internet operates and we don’t actually even know who done this attack and we don’t actually know the connection to the internet to it and there is no way to simply turn off the internet and lets not overlook that we already have Theresa May’s Snoopers Charter in this country and that legislation mandates the narrative of everyone’s internet data for 12 months.

The authorities have the ability to hack your social media accounts and mobile devices through rubber stamped warrants but also during disasters like terror strikes. It didn’t stop this one from occurring though, it didn’t stop Manchester or London Bridge but it did give Theresa May a stage to proceed to call for more control of the internet and it further conveniently bumped her up the polls just before the election.

She’s a pretty fortunate politician and this newest event comes at a time when Theresa May and Brexit are back at the forefront of the media again which is presently being taken over by the coverage of this crime.

Supposedly, sources have stated that the device contained a timer, therefore it may be been left there by somebody and not necessarily on their persons, therefore someone might not have set it off alongside themselves. It could have been put on at an earlier station in theory and police have confirmed a manhunt was underway.

Initial rumours on Twitter, a man with a knife associated with this was supposedly bogus news, it was evidently somebody on Twitter that got retweeted and allegedly mimicked by the explanation.

Judging from the fact that there is precious little damage to this tube carriage, CCTV should have caught all of this at every step of the way and we might actually see footage of whoever handled this bag and bucket to exist.

Now whether that ever comes out we will have to wait and see and as with 7/7 we never got any significant CCTV on 7/7 when the bombers were actually boarding their targets or on their targets which has perpetually been a strange fact, either it wasn’t recording, the tapes weren’t in, or it was destroyed during the blast but there was never actually a detailed explanation but with all the CCTV in London, there should be pictures of this Parson’s Green event at some period.

But what do you think?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The University of Utah Hospital, where a nurse was mistreated and restrained by police as she defended the legal rights of a patient, has imposed new constraints on law implementation, including prohibiting officers from patient-care domains and from direct contact with nurses.

Gordon Crabtree, interim chief executive of the hospital, said that he was profoundly concerned by the detention and mistreatment of burn unit nurse Alex Wubbels on July 26. In agreement with hospital administration and the law, she had declined to allow a Salt Lake City police officer to take a blood specimen from an unconscious patient.

Alex Wubbels got a copy of the body cam video of the encounter and, after consulting her lawyer, the hospital and police officials issued it. This will not happen again, and Alex Wubbles was praised for putting her own safety at jeopardy to defend the freedoms of patients.

This is crazy, cries Utah hospital nurse as a cop roughs her up, and arrests her for doing her job.

It’s horrifying what the police did to this nurse and modifications have now been implemented in the hospital rules to circumvent any repetition of the event. Police will no longer be allowed in patient-care domains, such as the burn unit where Alex Wubbels was the charge nurse on the day of the episode and from emergency quarters.

In addition, police will have to deal with house supervisors rather than nurses when they have a request. This will ensure that nurses dedicate themselves solely to patient care without arrests, while other officials dispense with police demands.

The policy was executed quietly in August before the episode became known.

The episode, which has brought national awareness in part because of the climactic video, which involved Detective Jeff Payne, who continued in demanding a blood sample from an unconscious truck driver at the hospital who had earlier been involved in an accident originating from a police pursuance of a suspect.

The hospital and the law in Utah and nationwide require police to have a warrant or authorization from the patient to draw a blood sample in such situations. Detective Jeff Payne had neither.

After Alex Wubbels respectfully and repeatedly read hospital procedure to him and had a supervisor back her up on a speakerphone connection, Detective Jeff Payne snapped. He grabbed hold of the nurse, pushed her out of the building and cuffed her hands behind her back.

A confused Alex Wubbels yelled for somebody to help her and that the detective was assaulting her as the detective pushed her into an unmarked vehicle and accused her of meddling with an investigation but this Utah nurse’s rough arrest has put patient consent law and police control in the limelight.

The police department stated that two of its employees had been put on administrative leave pending the outcomes of an investigation but did not give particulars. A criminal investigation has started, according to Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill, and the city’s mayor and its police chief apologised to Alex Wubbels in a statement.

As Alex Wubbels recounted the altercation with Detective Jeff Payne, she said that weeks after the episode she didn’t think the police were being held accountable.

The discussions she had with the Salt Lake City police originally were progressive, and they wanted to walk down a path of decisive change. But she did not have that same acknowledgement from the university police and the university security, so it was a little bit of a trigger to say, all right, this is what you need to see. If you’re not willing to see it then I’ll show it to you.

Alex Wubbels said that she didn’t want to police the police, but stated she and her attorney were contemplating a lawsuit if the departments concerned in the episode didn’t renew their policies.

Alex Wubbels said that she felt deceived by both Salt Lake City police and university security. She recounted how she sought to get guards to intervene, saying that Detective Payne appeared hostile from the second he arrived.

In the video, university officers can be seen standing by as Detective Payne fiercely grabs and arrests the nurse. She was terrified and went down into the emergency department to get help, to have someone protect her because she had felt unsafe from officer Payne from the start.

University of Utah Police Chief Dale Brophy apologised to Alex Wubbels and hospital personnel for his initial response to the episode. He stated he hadn’t seen the body camera footage until much later and realised then that he hadn’t taken it seriously enough.

He was then able to witness firsthand how badly the situation had been managed, and that this was not how law enforcing professionals should act. Alex Wubbels should not have been subjected to arrest for doing her job and pledged to put his officers through de-escalation training.

The patient Alex Wubbels tried to protect was 43-year-old William Gray, a truck driver who is also a reserve officer with the police department in Rigby, Idaho. William Gray was driving down the highway near Logan, Utah when a suspect fleeing police crossed into approaching traffic and smashed head-on into his tractor trailer.

The vehicle caught fire, and William Gray was seriously burned in the fire. The suspect perished in the collision and Alex Wubble should be commended for her professionalism and should be praised for holding steadfast in her judgment.

Preserving the rights of others is a really noble act. William Gray was still recuperating in the hospital, and he was not suspected of any wrongdoing in connection with the collision.

Alex Wubbels, 41, has served as a nurse at the hospital since 2009. She was earlier a member of the U.S. alpine ski team and competed in the 1998 and 2002 Winter Olympics.

She returned to the burn unit approximately a week and a half following her detention. Alex Wubbels required that time to give her emotions a rest so that she could come out and be practical and efficient in her statement.

She stood her ground. She stood for what was moral, which was to protect the patient, and any nurse, she believes, would have done precisely what she did.

It has given more ladder by America’s Gestapo and Donald Trump has given them more authority to be more proactive by enabling them to arm up with Military Style Equipment and use it to restrain American’s 1st Amendment Rights. It’s time to let people know that America’s Police Forces know it’s the US against them.

The Chief of Police confirmed the detective didn’t react properly. He did the usual and both Mr Payne and the Chief of Police should be discharged immediately. The police are forever later stating that they made a huge blunder and that they are sorry.

If you said to a police officer that you were sorry because you were speeding, you would still get a ticket. It appears that police officers believe they are beyond the law and it just goes to show that the Police are the most deadly gang in America.

If one watches the whole video, you can see that the supervisory cop telling Alex Wubbles while she’s sitting in the vehicle still handcuffed, with Detective Payne still towering over her, that she was wrong and that she should obey civil actions and remedies.

When a Detective like Payne wants to disregard the fundamentals, human dignity, natural rights, and constitutionally protected freedoms. The civil solution, let a judge rule if the evidence Detective Payne collected could be used in a court.

There was no remedy or lawsuit against Detective Payne. No remedy for the aggrieved, even if she/he is actually injured, killed, or shot in the process. This is what a cop is shown. No one’s freedoms mean anything when he’s implementing the law or investigating, and whatever he believes is necessary is okay and he will be supported by his system.

It occurs every day in America. Interaction with police at any level is dangerous to human beings and will end in the loss of dignity, dismissal of rights, and could probably lead to physical injury and even death.

It appears that cops are on a power trip maybe not all cops, but enough of them.

Barely a week goes by without an incendiary video of some cop or cops behaving in a strange or thoughtless manner. The cop, in this case, was way out of line. He was probably over caffeinated or experiencing pangs of doughnut withdrawal.

This is not really unusual these days and it’s terrible. Cops are out of control, as can be viewed by cell phone footage and police body cams and unless this ends, we will be joining a police state. Right is right, and police officers have to begin policing themselves.

We should not let people like Detective Payne get away with this baloney and he has probably done this before. This does not happen out of anywhere and he has been protected by the blue code of silence.

It’s horrifying that without the phone and body camera videos the Detective could have easily arrested her for resisting arrest or could have threatened someone else into violating the patient’s rights. The Detective apparently deemed himself superior to this nurse so picture how he and his kind see those most vulnerable relative to police officers levels of control, the who are poor and those who are non-white.

There are a number of confused armchair lawyers so to clarify. The concept of implied consent just means that by the act of applying for a drivers license you have agreed to the taking of some sort of chemical analysis when police have likely ground to believe you might have been driving under the influence of drugs or liquor.

For years some jurisdictions understood this to imply that a driver was expected to give a breath specimen or if the motorist was unable or disinclined to give a breath or a blood specimen. The Supreme Court clarified that meant permission authorised the police to take a breath specimen but that the taking of a blood specimen was too invasive of a procedure to be taken without permission or a suitably administered warrant.

The nurse was attempting to demonstrate this to the Detective. A lot of people have opinions about what happened, and appear to think that the nurse was attempting to prevent the Detective based on hospital procedures.

While the hospital did have procedures about this, they were based on modern case law and the Supreme Court ruling and were collectively agreed to by the University of Utah hospital and the SLCPD. So people trying to dispute that the Detective had the power to take the blood based on the implied consent doctrine, then they are wrong.

The Detective obviously has the classic big mouth and this nincompoop is the real representation of police arrogance. The very kind that gets them killed and Detective Payne was clearly not occupied in obeying the law.

Did he not consider that the charge nurse would react this way? And the University police was further derelict. It took the nurse going public to get them to take this matter seriously and the only way cops listen is to make them then go to someone else to hold them culpable.

These are the kind of cops that shoot first and protect themselves later and it was best that he was seen for what he is in this situation, rather than taking a young life because he was not being obeyed. For cops that is what it appears, it’s all about, and that all you have to listen to me I am God mentality and we require a more distinct force out there.

Modern Police departments also put peoples lives in danger by having high-speed pursuances. Clearly, Utah simply doesn’t understand and the Detective infringed the Federal Color of Law, which is an offence.

As a nurse, it is part of the pledge to protect all patients and to serve as their advocate and this should serve as a wake-up call for those contemplating going to nursing school. If this offence continues to ferment, then there is no immunity from the reach of an out of control administration.

Let’s face a reality that the cop was a total simpleton. All professions have them and when they’re rooted out by their own ignorance, they should be expelled from their posts at once.

Apparently, the officer at the centre of the debate over his handling of the Utah nurse was told not to bother about getting blood from an unconscious car crash victim in the hospital but decided to do so nevertheless.

At the hospital, Detective Payne relayed his difficulty in getting the blood specimen to a Logan detective, who was not at the hospital. According to Jensen, the detective then told Detective Payne the Logan department could get the blood through other means.

Apparently, he didn’t tell him you must stop, he just said don’t worry about it, we’ll go another way and Detective Payne’s actions were not in the real interest of the patient, the nurses or law enforcement.

He could have simply packed up and gone home.

The police didn’t seek a warrant because they didn’t originally realise the victim was unconscious and they had hoped to get the victim’s permission.

Some people disregard what it purports to serve society, and turn it around to believe that the people are there to serve their individual wants, this seems to be the latest trend, whose standards are being established in the highest places.

Apparently, the article has now been renewed with the report that Detective Payne has been discharged from his part-time paramedic position after declaring that he’d only bring critical patients to the University of Utah.

The horrifying piece of the new information is the reality that the police chief, made conciliatory remarks, and he took ages to view the footage that made plain that his officers were way out of line.

Nurses work long hours for an average wage to preserve the lives of patients, and to facilitate the passage through extreme and terrifying medical matters and I do hope this nurse seeks both legal and financial assistance upon the outrageous man who violated her, and the department who paid him to do it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During Barack Obama’s administration, his children Sasha and Malia were kept behind a solid protection from the media. In fact, numerous adverse stories about the two girls were washed solely following White House warnings. Now that President Trump is in the White House, libertarians appear to believe that it’s warranted in molesting children and it’s a fair sport.

Chicago organised a show that parodies Barron Trump, the 10-year-old offspring of President Donald Trump. According to The Gateway Pundit, the performance is called “Barron Trump Up Past Bedtime,” and stars local comic Shannon Noll as Barron.

The promotional photo for the production highlights a photo of Barron throughout his father’s address on Election Night. The summary of the performance states as follows: “Join Donald Trump’s youngest heir Barron Trump (as played by Shannon Noll) for a ‘Pee Wee’s Playhouse-style’ show that features celebrity guests (Melania Trump, Ben Carson, and Vladimir Putin) patriotic games (Pin the Email on the Clinton), and fancy fun!”

Noll revealed that she did it to use Barron as a means to comment on the government and she was reportedly motivated to take on the position because of her visible likeness to the child.

Noll’s performance starts with Melania tucking Barron into bed for the night. The child stays alert to explore a fantasy world, where he meets the likes of Vladimir Putin and Ben Carson.

Noll has made it apparent she has no concerns about the approach for the play and the media has been shockingly quiet about the sickening mockery though it’s certain they would have been up in arms if Sasha or Malia were the subjects of this comedian’s joke.

Do you believe that Barron Trump should be off limits because he is a child and not a political declaration?

On the day that Michelle Obama sent her daughters off to a new elementary school in a large black SUV with gun-toting Secret Service agents, she thought to herself, what on earth am I doing to these babies?

Her hubby was amongst the youngest men to serve as President, and their charming, young children attracted the world’s attention and shielding their girls from public inspection was a priority from the day he was selected.

The first lady pledged to serve no more than three days each week, declaring herself mom in chief, and to let her team know that Malia and Sasha’s school events should be the first things attached to her calendar.

President Obama, who had written in depth about his doubts as a husband and father before his election, and stated that his wife inspired him to be more committed in his daughters’ lives. Over eight years, they drew a quotidian public picture of their family life.

Supper together whenever he was home, turnout at parent-teacher appointments, coaching the girls in basketball, mom and dad date night, and the girls’ granny living with them to keep an eye out.

No family’s interior functioning is ideal. The president’s aides frequently cited the time-consuming job of raising children as one reason Obama did not consume more time on chatting and other niceties that political Washington demanded of a President.

But, in a 2013 discussion with CBS News, Michelle Obama referred to herself as a hard-working single mother. It was a slip of the tongue that may have been Freudian, and she promptly attempted to clarify that when you’ve got a spouse who is President, that it can seem a little single, but he’s there.

Times of honesty around the labours of parenting and the satisfaction of it have been a trademark of the Obamas’ time in government life. Here is how they addressed parenting

For three magic months, the two of them fussed and worried about their new infant, checking the cradle to make sure she was breathing, coaxing smiles from her, singing her songs, and taking so many photographs that they began to question if they were hurting her eyes.

Swiftly their different biorhythms came in beneficial and while Michelle got some well-earned rest, her husband would stay up until one or two in the morning, changing diapers, warming breast milk, feeling his daughter’s light breathing against his chest as he rocked her to sleep, guessing at her infant thoughts.

Michelle took her last job before her husband joined the White House because of her boss’s response to her family position. She didn’t have a babysitter, so she took Sasha right in there with her in her cradle and her rocker.

She was still nursing, so she was wearing her nursing shirt. She told her manager, that this was how it was, that she had two tiny children. Her husband was competing for the U.S. Senate. She would not work part time and she required extensibility.

She required a regular wage and she required to be able to afford a babysitter and if her boss could do all that, and he was prepared to be adaptable with her because she would get the work done, she could work arduously, on an adjustable schedule.

She was pretty precise and he said yes to everything.

Malia and Sasha were tiny babies when they came into office and it still leaves her in tears to recall the first day she put them in the vehicle with their Secret Service agents to go to their first day of school.

And as she stared at them going she thought, what on earth am I doing to these babies? So she understood right then and there her first mission was to make sure they were going to be healthy and whole and cared for in the centre of all the craziness.

The Obamas promised Sasha and Malia a puppy if their father became President and they took their new dog, a Portuguese water hound named Bo, on a walk before the press crew in April 2009.

The first thing she said to some of the crew when she did her visit because, of course, the staff were greeting them and saying that the girls were so fabulous so she said to them, that they were going to have to have some boundaries because the girls needed to be able to make their beds and tidy up.

Barack Obama said it was difficult to argue with Michelle when she insists that the responsibilities of the modern family fall more profoundly on the woman.

In 2009, Michelle Obama’s press secretary after Ty Inc designed Beanie Babies toys called Sweet Sasha and Marvelous Malia but it was considered unsuitable to use young, private subjects for marketing goals and the company promptly withdrew the dolls.

Barack Obama’s daughter’s response to the Gulf of Mexico’s oil spill disaster was that the Gulf was always going to be affected in a severe way and so his job was simply to make sure that everybody in the Gulf knows this is what he awakes in the morning and this is what he would go to bed at night pondering about.

But it’s not only him. When he awakens in the morning and he’s shaving and Malia taps on his bathroom door and she peeks in her head and she says, “Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?” Because he believes everybody knows that when we are defiling the Earth like this, it has real implications not merely for this generation, but for forthcoming generations.

Every child needs to get a flavour of what it’s like to do extremely arduous work and he was looking for possibilities for them to feel as if going to work and getting a paycheck is not invariably entertaining, not always enjoyable, not always fair. But that’s what most people go through every single day.

When he was first elected to office, Malia was 10 and Sasha was just 7 and they grow up too quick and as Malia heads off to college he’s beginning to choke up.

What’s the stuff that he’s going to treasure on his last breath, it’s not going to be anything to do with his position in office. He’s not going to be thinking about Grant Park and him getting selected. He’s not going to be thinking about even passing health care, as valuable as that had been.

What he’s going to treasure is him holding his daughter’s hand, and walking her to the park, and seeing the sun go down, and pushing his daughter on a swing. He would rouse every day in a dwelling that was constructed by slaves and he would watch his girls, two pretty, bright, black young girls playing with their dogs on the White House green.

But now Chicago improviser and stand-up comedienne Shannon Noll will perform the title part in the new stage production “Barron Trump: Up Past Bedtime.

It’s a variety act in the style of ‘Pee-wee’s Playhouse’ and it’s essentially Barron Trump getting read a slumber time story, and then choosing to stay up past his bedtime and play with his imaginary friends.

Although Noll considered the act a while ago, she takes the spotlight amid intensified concerns and push back and, Chicago citizen and “Saturday Night Live” writer Katie Rich tweeted and then removed an aggressive line about the president’s 10-year-old boy.

Rich was consequently suspended indefinitely from her position at the NBC late-night sketch show. Donald Trump declared the tweet a disgrace.

The shocking tweet, Noll stated, didn’t reveal her sensibility for the show and she noticed that she resembles Barron Trump and she believed that it would be an unusual approach. She has brought on contributors who will play solo stuff, the aforementioned imaginary friends and she is facilitating that as Barron Trump as master of ceremonies.

Barron Trump is supposedly not the target of a joke and when asked if she had any second thoughts about going onward with the production, Noll said no, but she kind of doubled-down.

She was formerly going to create a pretend Trump child, but she looked so much like Barron and going into this, she specifically constructed the character so that he conveys no similarity in character to what we’ve observed of Barron Trump and she is simply representing him as a general child.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were carnival festivities in the darkness of Grenfell Tower. It was the 51st Notting Hill carnival and it went forward with the importance on the nearby disaster.

 

Keeping Grenfell to that this year was very essential and everybody was out there dressed in green, saying that it was a terrible disaster in their community and their strive for justice is that down the line, justice looks really important to numerous people. But whether it’s criminal prosecutions, or whether it’s fair compensation that they’re looking for, it might even be about altering the entire profile of how people in social housing are treated up and down the country.

 

Doves were released to honour the victims and many wore green for Grenfell in memory of those who died in the fire and organisers believed the display would express admiration and honour amidst the celebration.

People have encompassed the Carnival and taken it and made it part of their grieving and it’s tough because there are many people who’ve lost family and friends or their homes and were now feeling too sad for all of this so quiet zones were set up for those just wanting to reflect and a protective ring was also constructed around the tower by the police to respect the site.

550 people perished in fires in the United Kingdom in 2015/2016. 80 people perished in the disaster of Grenfell so well done for the Notting Hill Carnival for honouring the dead. Now it’s time to acknowledge those annihilated in fires across the United Kingdom in 2015/16 and give their families similar compensation and proper alternative accommodation as has been given to those affected by the Grenfell disaster.

Yet the government have done absolutely nothing and the authorities want everyone to ignore it but as the charred remains of Grenfell Tower cast a darkness over the Notting Hill Carnival. This year’s event will be evidence of the solidarity, support and admiration for the victims of the fire and Grenfell Tower was at the core of the community. The survivors of the fire, friends and neighbours, have suffered dreadfully.

 

Sadiq Khan faced Grenfell Tower survivors and families, as dozens of white doves were released at the start of the Notting Hill Carnival as the London Mayor led a touching opening celebration in recognition of those who perished in the fire.

 

Survivors and local residents joined the Mayor, Kensington Labour MP Emma Dent Coat and council leader Elizabeth Campbell in a multi-faith prayer and white doves were released into the sky as a small act of remembrance to mark the disaster.

As people rocked and swaggered at the weekend’s Notting Hill Carnival in London, it’s worth remembering about the significant failures of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) to adhere to even the most fundamental policies of health and safety in relation to the Grenfell Tower fire.

Questions emerge as to whether that same culture of cost-cutting, ineptitude and blatant contempt for the safety of the poor has had any bearing on the levels of public safety standards at Britain’s most famous social experience.

Let’s now remind ourselves of what Carnival presently represents. There can be no uncertainty that it has helped London accomplish its world city standing. It stands adjacent to other global celebrations such as the New Orleans Mardi Gras, Brazil’s Rio Carnival, Toronto’s International Carnival and New York’s Labour Day demonstration.

It has served to define our city as welcoming, inclusive and progressive. Carnival helped the United Kingdom win the 2012 Olympic games, for example.

What about the spirit of Carnival? It’s essential to remember its origins as a festival of black freedom, an event whose roots go back to the one-day annual holiday oppressed Africans were given off from working on Massa’s slave plantation.

Following freedom, the Carnival became a vital element of the African diaspora’s social repertoire. In the United Kingdom, it was the west London Trinidadian community, driven by local activist Claudia Jones who, reacting to the discriminatory killing of Kelso Cochrane, was an important person in bringing the unifying strength of Carnival on to the streets of Great Britain and following freedom, the Carnival became a vital element of the and contentious social event in Europe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As pressures intensify amid the United States and North Korea, safety leaders are having talks on how to plan for various situations as they have to brave the unthinkable. While North Korea’s threats are focused on attacking the U.S. nation of Guam, Hawaii is also on high alert.

Right now the chief strategy is a readiness, and that’s to make certain that people in Hawaii realise what’s going to occur, what they have to do. However, some think the threat is minimal.

Some don’t think that Kim Jong Un will launch anything upon any region or jurisdiction of the United States but New Hampshire officials are further planning as the rhetoric grows amid the two nations.

They have stockpiles of beds and stocks that is required if they need to assemble a shelter for any reason, they could do that. Plus they have pre-designated shelters as well. This could be a pretty distant reality, however, state leaders want to be alert just in case.

They’re operating on it behind the scenes should they need to assemble and that there are policies in place that they have spent time and energy and dollars on a yearly basis to be equipped for all diverse kinds of emergencies and dangers.

The rhetoric from the president, who is ensuring fire and fury if North Korea proceeds to intimidate the United States has driven one candid critic of Donald Trump in New Hampshire to push for his dismissal.

Former U.S. Senator. Gordon Humphrey stated he wants Donald Trump divested of his executive capabilities under the 25th Amendment.

Donald Trump appears becoming ever more absurd and hostile, fire from the hip, and we have to bear in mind that in the context of these North Korean statements that the president has nuclear weaponry in his holster.

Donald Trump’s strongest New Hampshire supporters announced that Humphrey is out of line to challenge the president’s mental disposition.

Mitsuko Heidtke shakes her head in scepticism after discovering that Hawaii is presently the first US nation to plan for the probability of a nuclear confrontation with North Korea. She lives on the island of Oahu presently, but 72 years ago she was in Hiroshima, Japan.

She was 10 years old when she encountered firsthand the total destruction and the disastrous outcomes a nuclear bomb can present and she is upset to discover that there is even a faint probability of going through anything like that again in her lifetime.

However growing pressures amid the United States and North Korea over North Korea’s weapons plans have led Hawaii to take action.

On August 6, 1945, Mitsuko Heidtke was on a train going to school.

She saw the flash. She had never seen anything that intense. Then she saw the mushroom cloud and as she got off the train she saw the worst scenes of her life.

It was so frightening. People were rushing away with skin dangling from their bones and charred. At least 70,000 people were killed by the initial explosion of the US atomic bomb in 1945 but more than 70 years later, the intimidation of a nuclear confrontation is being appraised and prepared for just in case.

No matter how unlikely the possibility, Hawaii is getting prepared, just in case. State and military leaders know there will be limited time to respond if North Korea does launch a nuclear warhead directed at Hawaii. The nation has been operating on updating readiness for some seven months, long before the heightened rhetoric of this week.

If North Korea uses an intercontinental ballistic missile, from launch to hit, Hawaii is about 20 minutes.

Pacific Command would take approximately fives minutes to identify a launch, where the missile is going, which suggests the people would have about 15 minutes to take shelter and it’s not much time at all. However, it is enough time to give yourself an opportunity to survive.

Hawaii is working on how to prepare its 1.4 million inhabitants.

Emergency management officials are working on restoring an attack warning system comparable to the air raid sirens that blasted throughout the Cold War. Tests of that attack warning system haven’t occurred since the 1980s.

Officials have established a target period in November to test the outdoor attack warning sirens. The idea is to blast the sirens following the additional emergency tone that is currently utilised. That one, which signals of natural catastrophes, is triggered on the first business day of the month at 11:45 a.m.

That attack warning siren test will be triggered from inside the 6-feet-thick concrete walls of a civil defence shelter huddled under the rock and dirt of the Diamond Head volcano crater.

Turns out there are various dangers in utopia. Usually, the people operating around the clock within are keeping their eyes on the numerous natural tragedies that can hit Hawaii, hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquake activity in the area, volcanic movement or flooding. North Korea is now pretty much on the agenda of stuff to police.

They want people to just have a policy in place exactly like they would for a hurricane, tsunami, or any other emergency and they’re acutely cognizant that getting people to be prepared takes a lot of cajoling and repeated prompting.

Hawaii has a much broader overall emergency method in motion. Each section is still being operated on. One of the most significant roles is educating the people and leaflets are being redone. An alert system for cell phones is being created and now, people are being told to have 14 days of emergency supplies in their homes, rather than the seven that can suffice in the event of a hurricane or other natural catastrophe.

The current knowledge that military and emergency management officials in Hawaii have is that North Korea possibly holds a nuclear tool quite comparable in strength to what the United States military released on Hiroshima.

It would be calamitous and those in the vicinity of the collision locality would definitely evaporate, along with anything else in the blast path. Hundreds of thousands of people across the Hawaiian Islands would endure the primary blast, indicating citizens must know how to keep themselves alive until assistance arrives.

There are two successions of thought from the population, people are either responding with, why bother preparing? They will all be wiped out, or why prepare for a nuclear strike, because that will never occur.

It’s the nuclear byproduct that could end up annihilating people following the initial impact except if people know what to do. The advice is simple, take shelter quickly after a warning is issued. You can’t take the time to call your wife, your children, your husband to pick them up and attempt to locate a shelter. There is no time for that.

The safest choice is to locate a fallout shelter. For decades, following the close of the Cold War, those shelters were pretty much disregarded but presently Hawaii is looking at how they might finance restocking them.

With the population increase since the 1980s, there are not enough shelters in Hawaii to house everyone and entire communities are without even a single shelter.

Emergency management officials maintain there are other good alternatives to bypass the radioactive fallout, so people must be conscious of their surroundings and options. An underground concrete basement is perfect.

If they’re in a car near structures, they must get out into the centre of the concrete structure away from windows and doors. If there are just homes, they need to go to the inside and if they’re on the beach with no chance of getting to a building, look for a cave.

They should have 14 days’ worth of emergency rations. Not everyone will require stocks for that long, but that will give time for the radiation to dissipate.

People never believed they would have to think about another nuclear strike and there is only one message to world leaders and anyone who will listen. This sort of weapon should never be used, never ever again.

 

 

Energy drinks are the fuel that gets many of us through the workday or school day. The blend of sugar and caffeine gives a quick energy rush that helps us power through when we’re feeling exhausted.

What people may not realise, nevertheless, is that these drinks can possibly do some grave harm to the body.

Researchers at the United States Air Force Hospital recently led a study to investigate the impacts of energy drinks on a person’s heart. The investigation was carried out because they saw an increment of people coming to the Emergency Room with heart-related problems.

They started to believe that energy drink consumption was somehow associated with these heart problems.

The idea sparked since 75 percent of people on the base had verified that they drink energy drinks. That’s a tremendous spike in only the preceding few years without any investigation done to test exactly how these drinks affect the body.

The doctors divided up young participants into two groups. One group was given just under a litre of energy drink per day, while the other group was given a drink that bore only caffeine without the sugar and additional additives seen in energy drinks.

It was flavoured, so it was quite like an energy drink so participants had no conception who was drinking what.

Researchers discovered that the energy drinks contributed to problems with the beat of the drinkers’ hearts. They discovered that the energy drinks caused heart cessation for an added 10 milliseconds between beats.

While this appears insignificant, it can really be life-threatening.

Energy drinks further induced high blood pressure in people only two hours after drinking the beverage. This raised blood pressure continued for up to six hours after a person drank their drink. This puts a person at heightened risk for heart attack or stroke, even in an otherwise healthy person.

These problems were not observed in people who only had the caffeine beverage. Researchers aren’t quite clear on what in the energy drinks led to these problems, however, they think it’s the blend of the sugar infused with the caffeine.

It may, nevertheless, be any one of the various additives these drinks include.

Whilst the researchers concede that more investigations will need to be done before results can be formed about the safety of energy drinks, these primary conclusions are eye-opening. Considering many people drink a can or two, or more of energy drinks each day, the combined health impacts could be catastrophic.

This is very true in children. Many parents let their children drink energy drinks in the morning before school or as a special treat on the weekends. It’s unclear exactly what impacts these beverages may have on still-developing bodies, but parents should reflect long and hard before permitting their children to drink these beverages on a regular basis.

If you’re someone who drinks energy drinks on a daily basis, it may be a good idea to decrease it. Until the additional investigation is done to question their safety, it may be smart to simply stick to coffee.

This should be a message to people who drink energy drinks on a daily basis and you can purchase them from any shop, whenever you like. Many kids get them before school so that they can stay alert in the classroom and to help them concentrate.

Nevertheless, everybody should be cautious when purchasing these drinks because honestly, we have no idea what they’re doing to our body and you don’t have to be an expert in recognising that with the amount of sugar and caffeine in them that something is not right.

If people want to contaminate their body’s, then that is up to them, but the government take food off the shelve’s for fewer reasons than this and yet they have not taken energy drinks off racks. The government are continually moaning that we are a nation of fat people, yet they allow energy drinks onto our shelves that contain quantities of sugar.

There should be specific rules and regulations on drinks like this because these are not isolated instances of people going to the hospital with problems with their heart and presently there should be laws where these beverages are concerned.

The fact of the matter, these drinks are not good for our well-being and still, we allow our kids to drink them on a daily basis and don’t even give it another thought.

Everything that we eat and drink is peddled to us on the pretext of obtaining money, but this stimulant makes us feel livelier and better and enables us to have less sleep whilst we give investment to the businesses that design them.

The system that they sell them is all to do with money and nothing less than that and advertising models the world and the people in it – commodities for the believer that are assembled in front of their TV sets and accept what they see because that’s what publicity is all about, modifying the mind to believe in something that’s not even true.

It’s all a smoke screen that is draped in deception to suppress the brain and fetter our thoughts, it’s the control that advertising requires so that we purchase their commodities without any consideration for our health, so long as it draws them in money.

There has been plenty of discussion on energy drinks, yet the government does nothing about it, but then it’s another great way of decreasing the population whilst it disregards the remainder of the population and big businesses thrive from the profits – it’s perpetually about monetary gain.

It’s one thing profiting from somebody else, but to erode away at somebody else’s well-being is another matter and it becomes questionable when people begin having heart problems and determining that it’s because of energy beverages.

Companies produce so much of this drink and presumably, people are becoming sick because of this drink and it’s shocking as well as disturbing and not only that, our kids are drinking this drink as well, but it’s the solution to giving them enough strength to keep alert in the class room and to be able to study better.

There is a severity to this problem that will ultimately jeopardise the lives of countless people and there should be safeguards put in place where energy drinks are concerned – these drinks are becoming a danger to the human body.

The consequences are going to be catastrophic and what previously was a pleasant beverage to drink is presently regarded as something dangerous and it certainly should be brought to people’s attention and all these drinks should come with a warning sticker.

We buy in shops and launch these cans of energy drinks into our shopping baskets with no understanding of what they’re doing to our body or our children’s bodies. We’re simply submissive Frankenstein’s that are moulded by what we view on TV and we’re contented to go along with whatever we’re told.

We’re irritated by the minor stuff in life and not the major ones because we are dominated by media and advertising, particularly the younger generation, we’re simply the playhouse of drama that has been ensconced into our minds.

 

 

 

Police are used to being called to all kinds of unusual, and sometimes odd, situations. Yet, on June 16th, they never expected to show up at this unbelievable location, an elementary school.

The police were reacting to a request from the William P. Tatem Elementary school in Collingswood, New Jersey. Apparently, the whole calamity began all because of brownies being served at the end-of-the-year class party.

It was announced that a third grader had made an obscure remark about the brownies, another classmate eavesdropped and maintained that it was, in fact, a prejudiced comment. The school concluded they needed to get the police involved.

The police officers sat down and talked with the 9-year old boy who made the supposed bigoted remark, along with his mother, Stacy Dos Santos. Stacy Dos Santos stands by her son and maintains that the school totally exaggerated and her little boy would never do such thing, he just made a remark about the snacks.

He was simply discussing brownies, who precisely did he insult?

The drama proceeded to unfold as the police later communicated with the boy’s father and then referred it to the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency, but the 9-year-old was traumatised, according to his mum, he even stayed home from his last day of school. Stacy Dos Santos even wants to put her child in a new school come the fall.

That’s not all, she demands an apology from the school.

She is not satisfied with the administration at Tatem. She does not trust them and neither does her child. He was frightened, there was a police officer there with a piece in his holster speaking to her son, questioning him on what he had said and he didn’t have anybody on his side.

The episode got wind throughout the neighbourhood and it quickly sparked outrage and parents are shocked that events such as this could have quickly been managed by the school and by no means justified police attention.

The Superintendent of the school area, Scott Oswald, stated that police have just been requested up to 5 times a day in a community of just 1,875 pupils and this has generated justifiable attention amongst the parents.

Parents have started a petition to stop mandated criminal investigation of elementary school students.

Kids frequently say stuff that might be improper or are not politically correct and that can lead to extremely awkward situations, but they’re simply kids who are mastering the habits of knowledge but it’s up to schools and parents to oversee their children onto the correct path and to demonstrate why we can’t say specific things simply because they appear to be politically incorrect.

If kids are going to get offended because another student wants to discuss the ‘brownie’, then just change its name and name it something else, but it’s a system that has gone barking mad because it appears that when somebody now says something we all appear to require a legal counsellor in our corner, shortly it’s going to be part of the school program.

A meeting on May 25th involving the police, school administrators, and the Prosecutor’s office confirmed that schools would call the police concerning any criminal conflicts, including as minor as a simple name-calling episode that the school would typically manage within.

Whether this little boy name called or not, it was merely a simple incident that did not require the police and could have just been dispensed with between the school and the boy’s parents, and this was really a strain on resources for the police department.

They further chose to report just about every incident to the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency. Only a couple of months later, the directive is being seriously reviewed. It has gone way too far.

Parents worry that the extended police engagement is not benefiting their children, in fact, it’s absurd.

Some of it is really normal little-kid behaviour and the school are presently uncomfortable managing these sorts of circumstances or merely don’t know how to control such situations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Wisconsin company is microchipping their workers. The chip permits workers to access company resources, log into PC’s, and purchase food but they expect to increase its abilities.

Not simply unlocking opportunities, not just self-check out in stores, so many other things.

The concept is unique to the United States but is expanding abroad. With tens of thousands of chips marketed to corporations across Europe, participating businesses hold chip parties to implant workers with the masses.

The chip implants are the size of a speck of rice and optional to workers. Some people are a little worried, but from day one some were enthusiastic about what they could do with the technology itself, and where it could go for the company.

Approximately half of the Wisconsin workers opted out of the chip programme because some of their concerns were about health outcomes and what’s going to happen to their body when they’re putting this unknown thing into their hand and what’s going to occur down the road.

Employers and workers don’t come to the board with equal authority and equal access to one another and so the question around the problem of Microchipping workers really, in part, comes down to that.

Is it actually optional when your boss is asking you if you would like to be microchipped? Will there come a day where people who prefer not to be microchipped, won’t get specific jobs?

However, the company is guaranteeing workers that a microchip is a start in the right direction?

I imagine for some people the company would have to shoot them first before letting them implant a chip and people are foolishly becoming livestock and we should all wake up and inhale the java.

This will ultimately be imposed on all of us in our lifetimes. Furthermore, the government and corporate America will have complete authority over everything we do and shortly they’ll force legislators to devise a bill that you can get fired from a firm or refused work if you don’t get chipped.

Also, it’s ironic how the lambs fall for it, all they have to do is call it a chip party and every lamb runs along bleating.

This microchip is bull and it actually is a slippery incline to horrifying things and if you require any proof, study human history. Each new technology has essentially become instruments to dominate and eliminate people.

This sort of thing only ever occurred in really poor films and it’s a terrible technology in the wrong hands but we have the liberties to do anything we want, so if people want to get chipped it’s up to them, right?

Consider it this way, if they want to identify your marketing customs, they can verify your chip history. If they want to know where you are and where you’ve been, they can verify your chip. Do you honestly want someone else to have access to your everyday movements and habits?

Because it won’t simply be your boss, it will be data that can be obtained or summoned by anyone, the government included. Now consider how a video can be adjusted to match someone’s agenda. Data can likewise be manipulated.

Do you honestly want to be in that situation? Because it’s simply another way to manage us.

If they illegally monitor all of our cell phones with no problem, what makes us believe they won’t do this with microchip implants? We are advancing one step closer to Big Brother dystopia.

Most people have their phones with them all the time and WikiLeaks revealed the intelligence community taps each device that is connected to the internet. They upload all video’s and sound to a huge data collection centres, even when the device is turned off.

Of course, this technology already exists. It’s not a chip, but what do you imagine Facebook, Google and Amazon are? These websites map and document where you’ve been, purchasing habits, personalized advertisements per each user and much more.

We’ve been trained to accept stuff that deliberately reduces our freedoms, of course, it has been a more suggestive way of going about things, until now, people will ultimately accept that injecting a chip into one’s hand is the best thing to do.

It’s a one stop shopping, rather of extracting phone histories and bank accounts, they will have a one data pool. It skips through a bunch of red tape. This chip further paves the way to pursue our actions in real-time.

If people are okay with this, by all means, get a chip.

Sir Vince Cable has lashed out at hardline Brexit martyrs who see financial pain as a cost worth paying to break away from Brussels.

The Liberal Democrat leader stated older Brexit voters have nostalgia from an imperial past and attacked them of masochism in a surprising offensive.

He spoke following a census discovered half of all Leave-voting pensioners believe Brexit will be deserving of it, even if their family members lose their jobs.

YouGov’s shock poll also discovered 61 percent of Leave voters stated significant destruction to the British market would be a price worth paying for Brexit. Amongst pensioners, the number was 71 percent.

Sir Vince, who at 74 is the oldest party leader following Winston Churchill, stated: “To describe such masochism as ‘martyrdom’ is dangerous. We haven’t yet learned about Brexit jihadis, however, there is a hint of violence in the language which is troubling and self-declared martyrs seem to be predominantly in the elderly.

The pain of the old comes cheap because they have fewer jobs to lose, and the old have comprehensively shafted the young.

Furthermore the old have had the ultimate word about Brexit, inflicting a world view distorted by sentimentality for a supreme past on a younger generation much more content with contemporary Europe.

In the meantime, Whitehall sources attempted to play down speculation that Theresa May would be prepared to pay a Brexit bill of £36 billion as part of a compromise to strike a far-reaching free trade deal with Brussels.

The so-called divorce bill has been one of the principal stumbling blocks in Brexit discussions within the Government and Brussels.

Evidently, the Government will only agree to meet the amount if the EU treats it as part of a settlement on prospective relations, including the comprehensive trade agreement solicited by the Prime Minister.

The EU’s position is that trade talks cannot start until meaningful development has been made on the financial arrangement, citizens freedoms and Northern Ireland.

Supposedly a senior Whitehall source was cited as stating the EU’s position was that the fee should be 60 billion euro (£54 billion), however the actual bottom line was 50 billion euro (£45 billion), the United Kingdom’s position was 30 billion euro (£27 billion) and the landing position is 40 billion (£36 billion) even if the people and MP’s are not all there yet.

But supposedly that actually is nonsense, supposedly, it’s not where we are. Apparently, the £36 billion figure is just speculation.

I’m not certain about shafting the young and I’m not convinced how he has the temerity to speak about it, what about his party pledging to eliminate tuition prices and then tripling them? What about his interview where he stated we had to import people from abroad to do the skilled trades because our own young people weren’t up to it?

Vince Cable has shafted enough people in his life time and we’ve had to put up with the old bottom burping moron.

There were actually a lot of retired people who voted to remain in the EU, not every ageing person voted to leave, it’s simply not true. There were hundreds of postal votes in residential homes for the elderly that may have tilted the numbers.

All voters in the United Kingdom elderly or young are shafted by whoever gets in.

Everyone gets shafted. The motorist is shafted over diesel, the motorist is shafted full stop, the old were shafted about saving for their old age. We all got shafted over energy tariffs and Vince Cable is one of those people, only this time the shoe is on the other foot and he doesn’t like it. We are all shafted full stop!

It’s all rather cynical, but then, most of us are pretty gullible and the government are forever in question and the people in the United Kingdom are the rubbish tip and there is no peace in this country.

Our border controls are much too carefree but that is now the shape of our nation and the government are comfortable allowing immigrants in because they will work for less and endless man-hours but the people are supposed to sit there in silence and say nothing.

We are inspired to vote but what are we really voting for? Because at the end of the day, it’s all really disheartening because we are fooled by our government all the time. We are always being swindled, however, too much wrong has been done now.

We can scrutinise the government as much as we like, but unless we the people do something about it, it’s going to continue to be the same and the government come under scrutiny all the time and we challenge what they’re doing, but that’s about it.

The people of the United Kingdom are a force to be reckoned with, they just don’t realise it. We make a lot of noise about our government but we are further so cautious of what we say and how we say it.

It’s not sensitivity that we need because the government have none at all, they just say whatever they want and they decline to have any compassion for the people of the United Kingdom, we are simply a factory of serfs.

 

 

 

 

The Duke of Edinburgh has met Royal Marines who have finished a gigantic 1,664-mile trek, this is his last official Royal appearance before he withdraws from public duties.

In the grounds of Buckingham Palace, Philip praised the accomplishments of servicemen who have taken part in the 1664 Global Challenge, a series of strength and endurance achievements raising funds and awareness for the Royal Marines Charity.

The Queen’s Consort announced in May he would be withdrawing from royal duties following more than 65 years supporting the monarch in her position as head of state and attending events for his own charities and organisations.

In the forecourt of Buckingham Palace Philip, in his capacity as Captain General of the Royal Marines, attended a parade to mark the close of the 1664 Global Challenge.

Philip, 96, was celebrated at the time for his public service with Prime Minister Theresa May leading the tributes stating he had given the Queen constant support, while Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn announced the Duke’s distinct understanding of public service had inspired people for more than 60 years.

Despite his age, Philip’s decision, which was entirely supported by the Queen and was not medically related, came as a shock as he still seemed to enjoy engaging with people and carrying out his public position.

The Duke is recognised for his jokes and over the past few months has been joking about his approaching departure, even telling celebrity chef Prue Leith at a Palace event “I’m discovering what it’s like to be on your last legs”.

Buckingham Palace has emphasised although the Duke’s diary of appointments will come to a close on Wednesday, he might choose to attend individual events, alongside the Queen, from time to time.

The Queen’s public agenda proceeds as usual, but other members of the Royal Family will step up in support of the Monarch in her position as head of state.

Prince Philip’s relationship with the Royal Marines dates back 64 years to June 2, 1953, when he was elected Captain General in succession to the late King George VI.

The challenge, which recognises the year 1664 when the Corps was established, has seen Royal Marines all over the world raising funds for the military unit’s charity with a number of ingenious achievements.

The 1,664-mile running hurdle started in Plymouth on April 25 with Royal Marines running 16.64 miles a day for 100 days, with the exhausting trek due to finish at Buckingham Palace on Wednesday.

The Duke will meet some of the runners including two Royal Marines who have completed the whole distance.

Royal Marines from around the globe have also been taking part in extreme events including a 34-mile swim underwater and a troop of Royal Marines lifting more than 20,000 tonnes and running 10,000 kilometres.

Throughout the event, Philip will further engage with ex-soldiers and cadets before getting the 1664 Global Challenge baton.

The parade will close with a parade past, a royal fanfare and three hurrahs for the Captain General.

Over the years, Prince Philip has tended numerous Royal Marines events and in 2014, to mark the Corps’ 350th anniversary, the Duke donned his entire ceremonial costume as Captain General to the state opening of Parliament.

Did you know? Prince Philip was the first member of the Royal Family to fly in a helicopter.

Prince Phillip From Greece to a great-grandfather.

10 June 1921, Prince Philippos of Greece and Denmark is born to Prince Andrew of Greece and Princess Alice of Battenberg in the family home, Mon Repos, on Corfu. He is the youngest of five children.

December 1922, eighteen-month-old Prince Philip, travelling in a makeshift cot made from an orange crate, is evacuated from Greece on a Royal Navy ship after King Constantine I is forced to resign.

1923, the family locates in the outskirts of Paris, however Princess Alice starts to experience mental health problems and her devout beliefs become more strange.

1928, at the age of eight Philip, goes to England to live with his grandmother and his uncle.

1930, Philip’s mother Princess Alice is diagnosed with schizophrenia and confined to a sanitarium in Switzerland for two years. His father Prince Andrew travels to the French Riviera. Philip is shipped to Cheam Preparatory School in the United Kingdom.

1933, at the age of 12 he spends two terms at Salem School in south Germany, controlled by Kurt Hahn, who encouraged Philip to set up the Duke of Edinburgh Award.

November 1934, Prince Philip and Princess Elizabeth both attend the union of Philip’s cousin Princess Marina to Elizabeth’s uncle George, Duke of Kent, at Westminster Abbey.

1934, Philip starts at Gordonstoun School in Morayshire. He flourishes, becoming head boy and leader of hockey and cricket.

1936, George V dies and is replaced by his son Edward VIII, who resigns 11 months later in December 1936 because of his affection for American divorcée Wallis Simpson.

May 1937, Coronation of George VI and Princess Elizabeth watches her father being crowned king. Philip is amongst the gathering.

November 1937, Prince Philip attends the internment in Germany of his sister Cecilie, who was killed in a plane crash at the age of 26.

May 1939, in the run-up to the start of the Second World War, Philip finishes at Gordonstoun and starts his naval work at the Britannia Royal Naval College in Dartmouth, where he gains two prizes for being the greatest cadet.

July 1939, the young Princess Elizabeth falls in love with Philip when he accompanies her and her sister Princess Margaret during a tour of the college.

1940, Philip joins the battleship HMS Ramillies in 1940 in Colombo as a midshipman and spends six months in the Indian Ocean.

January 1941, he serves on the HMS Valiant in Alexandria and two months later is named in despatches for his actions throughout the Second World War in the Battle of Matapan after detecting an unforeseen enemy ship with the search lights. He is later given the Greek War Cross of Valour.

1942, Philip progresses through the ranks and becomes one of the youngest officers in the Royal Navy to be made First Lieutenant and second-in-command of a ship, HMS Wallace.

1943, HMS Wallace is despatched to the Mediterranean and gives cover for the Canadian beachhead of the Allied landings in Sicily.

Prince Philip visits with the Royal Family a number of times throughout home leave and, following a Christmas visit, Princess Elizabeth sets a picture of him on her dressing table.

2 September 1945, Philip is in Tokyo Bay when the Japanese surrender.

1946, Philip returns to the United Kingdom, spending time at naval training schools. He asks George VI for Princess Elizabeth’s hand in matrimony.

29 February 1947, Philip disavows his claims to the Greek throne and becomes a British citizen, Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten.

9 July 1947, the engagement of Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten to Princess Elizabeth is announced.

20 November 1947, Philip marries Princess Elizabeth at Westminster Abbey. He is made the Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth and Baron Greenwich shortly before his marriage.

October 1948, the Duke visits the Royal Naval Staff College at Greenwich.

14 November 1948, the Duke becomes a father when Princess Elizabeth gives birth to their first son, a son and eventual leader, Prince Charles.

1949, Philip is elected First Lieutenant and second-in-command of HMS Chequers, working from Malta with the Mediterranean fleet.

1950, he is advanced to Lieutenant-Commander and then appointed in charge of the frigate HMS Magpie in Malta.

21 October 1950, Philip and Elizabeth’s second child, Princess Anne, is born.

1951, the Duke and Princess Elizabeth return home from Malta to Clarence House. Philip leaves the Navy early because of the deteriorating well-being of King George VI. Prince and Elizabeth are expected to take on extra royal duties.

Princess Elizabeth and Philip make their first important tour together to Canada and the United States in October and November 1951, following which the Duke is made a Privy Counsellor.

6 February 1952, George VI dies and Princess Elizabeth becomes Monarch while in Kenya on a Commonwealth tour.

2 June 1953, the Queen’s Coronation at Westminster Abbey. The Duke of Edinburgh vows to be his wife’s “liege man of life and limb” and is the first layman to pay kind loyalty to the newly-crowned sovereign.

1956, the Duke begins the Duke of Edinburgh Award. The Duke travels the Commonwealth on the royal yacht Britannia, without the Monarch.

February 1957, the Queen gives the Duke the style and title of a Prince of the United Kingdom.

February 1960, Prince Andrew is born.

1961, the Duke becomes the first President of the World Wildlife Fund-UK, becoming its international president in 1981. But his shooting of a tiger while in India sparks judgment.

1964, Prince Edward is born.

1971, the Duke gives up polo but goes on to take up carriage driving.

1977, the Queen’s Silver Jubilee, 25 years on the throne.

1981, Prince Charles marries Lady Diana Spencer.

1982, Prince William, a future king is born and Prince Andrew comes back safely from the Falklands War.

1984, Prince Harry is born.

1986, the Duke makes a comment about slitty eyes on a state appointment to China and the Monarch celebrates her 60th birthday.

Prince Andrew marries Sarah Ferguson.

1992, the Queen’s annus horribilis and the Princess Royal and Captain Phillips split, the Prince and Princess of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of York separate and Windsor Castle is hit by a fire.

1993, the Queen begins to pay income tax to the Government.

1996, the Prince of Wales divorces Diana, Princess of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of York split.

31 August 1997, Diana, Princess of Wales, dies in a car wreck.

20 November 1997, the Queen and the Duke’s Golden Wedding anniversary.

April 1999, is a hectic and difficult agenda that did take its toll sometimes. While attending the Monarch on a state visit to South Korea, Philip falls asleep at a banquet.

2000, a new millennium and the Queen Mother’s 100th year.

2002, the Queen’s Golden Jubilee, 50 years on the throne. The Queen’s younger sister Princess Margaret and the Queen Mother died.

Philip asks an Aborigine if they still launch spears at each other throughout a tour of Australia.

2007, the Monarch and the Duke mark their Diamond Wedding anniversary.

April 2008, the Duke is admitted to hospital with a chest infection that requires him to cancel a number of commitments. He spends three nights in the private King Edward VII’s Hospital.

December 2010, the Duke becomes a great-grandfather for the first time with the addition of Peter and Autumn Phillips’ daughter Savannah.

2010, Buckingham Palace announces Philip will step down as patron or president of more than a dozen organisations when he turns 90.

June 2011, the Duke marks his 90th birthday. The Queen gives him a new title, Lord High Admiral, the titular head of the Royal Navy.

April 2011, Prince William weds Kate Middleton at Westminster Abbey and the Monarch visits Ireland.

Christmas 2011, the Duke is raced to the hospital by helicopter after experiencing chest pains. He spends four nights in the hospital, including Christmas Day, and is treated for a blocked coronary artery at Papworth Hospital in Cambridgeshire.

2012, is the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee and the Duke is forced to miss the preponderance of the festivities when he falls unwell with a bladder infection.

August 2012, Philip is treated for a bladder infection once again and spends five nights in hospital in Aberdeen, missing the opening of the Paralympic Games.

June 2013, two days following the service to mark the 60th anniversary of the Queen’s coronation, he is hospitalised for an operation on his abdomen and spends two months recovering.

July 2013, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s son Prince George is born, third in line to the throne, a prospective king and the Duke’s great-grandson.

May 2015, Prince Philip and the Queen’s great-granddaughter Princess Charlotte of Cambridge is born.

September 2015, the Monarch becomes the longest-reigning ruler in British history.

April 2016, the Queen marks her 90th birthday.

October 2016, the Monarch becomes the world’s longest-reigning living ruler, following the death of Thai King Rama IX.

June 2016, Philip turns 95, his birthday coincides with a weekend of celebrations for the Queen’s official 90th birthday.

4 May 2017, Buckingham Palace announces that Philip is to step down from public engagements in the autumn.

February 2017, the Monarch reaches her Sapphire Jubilee, 65 years on the throne.

2 August 2017, Prince Philip’s closing scheduled public duty, and the Captain General’s Parade at Buckingham Palace. Philip has held the office of captain general of the Royal Marines since 1953.

There are not many men who can still fit into the suit they wore on their wedding day, however, it is a measure of the Duke of Edinburgh’s extraordinary great stamina and energy that he can make such a striking claim.

Just a few weeks shy of his 96th birthday Prince Philip is thought to be in exceptionally great shape and his secret seems to be deceptively easy, regular exercise, a balanced diet and a healthy measure of sheer will power.

Prime to this is a management of small but intense workout utilised by both the Duke of Edinburgh and Prince Charles, called the 5BX Plan.

The program, created to increase the fitness of recruits for the Royal Canadian Air Force, can be carried out in a confined area, with no warm up or equipment needed, utilising five fundamental activities to strengthen each muscle in the body.

Like any person his age, the Duke has, of course, had the occasional health scare, but their rarity has only helped to highlight his overall health and durability.

Those who know Prince Philip say none of this is an accident. He works at staying healthy and, in a reflection of his days serving in the Royal Navy, has remained determined never to let himself go.

He is a man who has always looked after himself and taken custody of his body. He’s someone who enjoys physical exercise and he’s amazingly physically fit. He’s pretty picky about what he eats. If he puts on any weight at all, he will make certain he loses it.

The Duke prefers to walk and take the stairs where he can, and can still be seen behind the reins of a horse carriage in the grounds of Windsor Great Park.

Prince Philip took up carriage driving in 1971 after only withdrawing from polo at the age of 50 because of an arthritic wrist.

He used to compete, taking part in games such as the International Grand Prix in the Royal Windsor Horse Show, but now likes to put the ponies through their steps for pleasure.

It was only when he reached the age of 82 that Philip chose for the first time not to take part in the Trooping the Colour ceremony on horseback. Alternatively, he travelled in a carriage with the Queen.

Buckingham Palace has long declined to elaborate on the specifics of the Duke’s exercise regime but verifies he is an enthusiastic walker and points out that it takes quite a lot of energy to manage two or three ponies towing a carriage.

With each fleeting birthday, the Duke’s diet has been the topic of renewed speculation. Those who have been able to observe him at close quarters state it is usually a low carbohydrate regime, comparable to the Atkins-diet.

He is believed to favour black coffee, seldom drinking tea of any kind, and appreciates the rare fry-up for breakfast, though he further prefers to commence the day with oatcakes with honey.

The Duke consumes small quantities of alcohol and one biographer observed that he is partial to a pale ale at lunchtime.

Prince Philip’s longstanding personal clothier has vouched for the fact that he can still fit into the very naval uniform he donned on his wedding day.

There’s not a measure of fat on him, which is why he dons his outfits so well and he’s really well proportioned. He’s got moderately lengthy pins, and he doesn’t bear much ballast.

The Prince’s measurements have remained mainly consistent over the past five decades. He was a 31in waist when he was first measured, and presently just a 34, that’s unbelievable and he’s not had to have any of the threads let out.

The Duke’s determination to give up smoking virtually overnight in 1947, shortly before his wedding to the Monarch, has no doubt added to his excellent health and extended years.

So much so, that he was able to tell experts at the Francis Crick Institute, in November last year, that he had not had the flu for 40 years and he has further stated that he avoids consulting doctors because of their conflicting views.

Unavoidably, nevertheless, there have been low periods when convalescence or even appointments to the hospital were needed and very recently both the Monarch and the Duke fell unwell with heavy colds before Christmas last year, requiring them to delay their excursion to Sandringham by a day.

Shortly before his 95th birthday in June 2016, Prince Philip pulled out of the Battle of Jutland anniversary celebrations following medical opinion concerning a minor illness.

However, he was at the Queen’s side several days later for her official birthday festivities, including a service of thanksgiving, Trooping the Colour and a street party in The Mall, but in May 2014, the Duke had a minor procedure carried out on his right hand at Buckingham Palace and in June the past year, he spent two months convalescing following an exploratory procedure on his abdomen.

In December 2011 he was fitted with a heart stent and has twice been treated for bladder infections, including throughout the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee weekend in June 2012, when he fell unwell following having to stand in the cold on a barge throughout the Thames pageant.

On leaving the hospital, the day before his 91st birthday, Prince Philip was asked if he was feeling better. He answered, in his typical fashion: “Well, I wouldn’t be coming out if I wasn’t.”

The Prince has this selective manner about him, some people like it, some people loathe it but his approach, as irritating as it is sometimes to some people is not intended to be antagonistic, just really tongue in cheek entertainment.

If he’s asked a dumb question, he will just give a funny response, which really makes him a pretty down to earth sort of person, with a pretty good sense of humour.

His unbelievable energy, extraordinary sound vitality and a strong sense of public responsibility have seen Prince Philip through a myriad of official appointments over the course of his 64-year union to our Monarch.

Yet it is the unashamedly politically incorrect remarks he makes that have drawn the greatest attention over the years. Furthermore, as we pay praise to what Philip himself defined as “Dontopedalogy”, the ability to open your trap and putting your foot in it, a craftsmanship which he has practised for a great many years.

Philip has made some really huge boobs over the years on state appointments:

‘You look like you’re ready for bed!’ To the President of Nigeria, who was wearing traditional robes.

‘Do you still throw spears at each other?’ To Aboriginal leader William Brin during a visit to the Aboriginal Cultural Park in Queensland, 2002.

‘We don’t come here for our health. We can think of other ways of enjoying ourselves.’ On a trip to Canada in 1976.

‘You managed not to get eaten then?’ To a British student who was trekking in Papua New Guinea, during an official visit in 1998.

‘Aren’t most of you descended from pirates?’ To residents of the Cayman Islands in 1994.

On Europe:

‘I would like to go to Russia very much, although the bastards murdered half my family.’ In 1967, when asked if he would like to visit the Soviet Union.

‘Damn fool question!’ To a BBC journalist at a banquet at the Elysée Palace in Paris after she asked the Queen if she was enjoying her stay.

‘It’s a vast waste of space.’ To guests at the opening reception of a new £18 million British Embassy in Berlin in 2000.

‘You can’t have been here that long, you haven’t got a pot belly.’ To a British tourist, he met during a tour of the Hungarian capital Budapest in 1993.

On Scotland:

‘How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?’ To a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.

‘It looks as though it was put in by an Indian.’ The Prince’s verdict on a fuse box given during a tour of a Scottish factory in August 1999. He later apologised: ‘I meant to say, Cowboys. I just got my cowboys and Indians mixed up.’

‘People usually say that after a fire it is water damage that is the worst. We are still drying out Windsor Castle.’ To survivors of the Lockerbie bombing in 1993.

On China:

‘Ghastly.’ Prince Philip’s opinion of Beijing, during a tour of China in 1986.

‘If it has got four legs and it is not a chair, if it has got two wings and it flies but is not an aeroplane, and if it swims and it is not a submarine, the Cantonese will eat it.’ To a meeting of the World Wildlife Fund in 1986.

‘If you stay here much longer, you will go home with slitty eyes.’ To a British student on a visit to China in 1986.

On Multi-cultural Britain:

‘There’s a lot of your family in tonight.’ After noticing business leader Atul Patel’s name badge during a Buckingham Palace reception for 400 influential British Indians in 2009.

‘So who’s on drugs here? He looks as if he’s on drugs.’ To a 14-year-old member of a Bangladeshi youth club in 2002.

‘Are you all one family?’ Said to mixed-race dance troupe Diversity at the 2009 Royal Variety Performance.

On Women:

‘British women can’t cook.’ Endearing himself to the Scottish Women’s Institute in 1961.

‘Ah, so this is feminist corner then.’ To a group of female Labour MPs at a Buckingham Palace drinks party in 2000.

‘You are a woman, aren’t you?’ To a Kenyan woman in 1984, after accepting a state gift.

‘If it doesn’t fart or eat hay, she isn’t interested.’ On his daughter, Princess Anne.

‘When a man opens the car door for his wife, it’s either a new car or a new wife.’

On Celebrities:

‘What do you gargle with — pebbles?’ To Tom Jones, after the Royal Variety Performance, 1969. He later added: ‘It is very difficult at all to see how it is possible to become immensely valuable by singing what I think are the most hideous songs.’

‘Oh, it’s you that owns that ghastly car, is it? We often see it when driving to Windsor Castle.’ To near-neighbour Elton John after hearing that he had sold his Watford FC-themed Aston Martin in 2001.

‘I wish he’d turn the microphone off!’ During Elton John’s performance at the 73rd Royal Variety Show in 2001.

On Food and Drink:

‘Get me a beer. I don’t care what kind it is, just get me a beer!’ On being offered fine Italian wines by Prime Minister Giuliano Amato at a dinner in Rome in 2000.

‘Don’t feed your rabbits pawpaw fruit, it acts as a contraceptive. Then again, it might not work on rabbits.’ To a Caribbean rabbit breeder in Anguilla in 1994.

On Class and Money:

‘People think there’s a rigid class system here, but dukes have been known to marry chorus girls. Some have even married Americans.’ In 2000.

‘If you travel as much as we do, you appreciate the improvements in aircraft design of less noise and more comfort, provided you don’t travel in something called economy class, which sounds ghastly.’ To the Aircraft Research Association in 2002.

‘All money nowadays seems to be produced with a natural homing instinct for the Treasury.’ Lamenting the rate of British tax in 1963.

‘We go into the red next year. I shall probably have to give up polo.’ On the Royal Family’s finances in 1969.

‘Everybody was saying we must have more leisure. Now they are complaining they are unemployed.’ Said at the height of the recession in 1981.

On Art and Fashion:

‘You didn’t design your beard too well, did you? You really must try better with your beard.’ To a young fashion designer at Buckingham Palace in 2009.

‘It looks like the kind of thing my daughter would bring back from her school art lessons.’ On seeing an exhibition of ‘primitive’ Ethiopian art in 1965.

On the Press:

‘You have mosquitos. I have the Press.’ To the matron of a hospital in the Caribbean.

He’s excellent and his sense of humour is so cheeky and playful.

Nevertheless, the greatest one of all was when the Pope was visiting Holyrood. On seeing Iain Gray, Prince Philip noticed his tie which was in the St. Ninian’s Day tartan, a design that had been created to mark the event.

He turned to Annabel Goldie, the Scottish Tory leader who was standing alongside Iain Gray, and the Prince asked, ‘Have you got a pair of knickers made out of this stuff?’, to which she promptly answered, ‘I can’t possibly comment and even if I did I couldn’t possibly exhibit them’.

This one was a National treasure when Philip stated, ‘In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation’, which Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh stated in 1988.

The royal couple said “I do” on November 20, 1947, in a grand celebration at Westminster Abbey, where their withstanding relationship was based on their reciprocal love and admiration but further a partaken sense of humour, after all, Prince Philip is especially hilarious.

As the man who remains to stand behind and supported his Queen, Philip has built a royal benchmark for marvellous relationship goals.

In fact, the Duke of Edinburgh traipse around and quips that he is the fella who belongs to Mrs Queen, rather than being professionally qualified in something.

The mother-of-four is really relaxed around her man and it’s not unknown for the Monarch to tell the Duke to shut up. Although there was a point when you wouldn’t get a peep out of her. She was so bashful and you couldn’t get a sound out of her, Philip recollected of his encounter with Elizabeth in 1939.

Following 50 years of marriage, Philip famously wisecracked that you could take it from him, the Queen has the kind of patience in abundance and that the secret of a contented marriage is to have diverse interests.

Kidding aside, it is obvious that it is the Prince’s total commitment to his wife that has been a spine to their unbelievable partnership and his first job, second and last is never to let the Queen down. The way he looks at her, even after decades of marriage, Prince Philip has but one Queen.

Laughing their way through life has made for an excellent union.

Forever by her side, Prince Philip is the Queen’s number one confidant.