NEWS FLASH – JOHNNY DEPP

Johnny Depp has struggled with alcoholism and addiction for much of his life. He even said that he started using drugs by taking his mother’s nerve pills at the age of 11, was smoking at the age of 12 years old and by the age of 14 he’d used every kind of drug that there was.

And in a 1997 interview, Johnny Depp acknowledged past abuse of alcohol during the filming of What’s Eating Gilbert Grape? (1993), and in a 2008 interview, Johnny Depp stated that he’d poisoned himself with alcohol for years, but in 2013, Johnny Depp stated that he’d quit drinking alcohol, adding that he pretty much got everything he could out of it.

Johnny Depp also said that he investigated wine and spirits thoroughly, and they certainly investigated him as well and that they got along with each other beautifully, although maybe a little too well.

But when he split up with longtime partner Vanessa Paradis, Johnny Depp said that he definitely wasn’t going to depend on the drink to relieve things or soften the blow or cushion the problem because that could have been disastrous.

However, according to his ex-wife, Amber Heard, Johnny Depp plunged into the depth of paranoia and violence after binging on drugs and alcohol during their relationship between 2013 and 2016, and in a 2018 Rolling Stone profile of Johnny Depp, reporter Stephen Rodrick wrote that he’d used hashish in his company and described him as alternately hilarious, sly and incoherent.

During his 2020 libel trial, Johnny Depp admitted to having been addicted to Roxicodone and alcohol as well as other substances such as MDMA and cocaine during his relationship with Amber Heard.

A High Court was shown a video of Johnny Depp smashing up a kitchen and tossing a wine bottle in an intoxicated frenzy at Amber Heard, whilst he tells her ‘You wanna see crazy? I’ll give you f—ing crazy’, but he denied ever hitting her.

We all know that alcohol can make us act in a way that we wouldn’t normally, including making us more angry or aggressive, and that alcohol can induce different emotional responses for different people.

Cocaine can also make you agitated, give you paranoia, hallucinations, delusions, and make you volatile. It can also induce suicidal and homicidal thinking, and other narcotics can cause similar effects.

We will never actually know whether Johnny Depp hit Amber Heard, or that his drug and alcohol consumption cause egomaniacal behaviour, but we do know that alcohol and drug use can cause these behaviours.

Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t but clearly, these two should have never been together in the first place. It’s just a case of he did that or she done this, and we will never truly get to the bottom of it, but clearly, the court didn’t believe Amber Heard, but generally, if there has been abuse in the relationship, abusers go onto abuse again.

Johnny Depp was seen in the clip trashing the kitchen, but not touching Amber Heard, but even so, this is not the behaviour of a rational person, something is indeed amiss.

We see all these glamorous couples smiling in magazines and we all feel a tad jealous, but you never know what goes on behind closed doors, and let’s face it, Johnny Depp hasn’t been that glamorous for at least two decades.

But whether he launched a bottle in the kitchen or anywhere else, it’s all destructive behaviour which develops over time, and sometimes what wasn’t acceptable to you a year ago becomes the norm, and of course, he didn’t start out like this, but as all his craziness goes on he will need to feel more and more in control, and once it starts it’s like a drug.

GPs Still Refuse To See Patients Face-To-Face. What Could Possibly Justify This?

Helen Leaford, 62, from Basingstoke was falling over and suffering dizzy spells, but her GP advised her to use ear drops and get used to being off balance, but instead, she borrowed money from friends and went to see a private doctor. The £300 doctor said she needed an urgent MRI scan to diagnose the problem.

Pinned to the door of a GP surgery on a leafy residential road in suburban Sidcup, Kent is a handwritten message, attached to the interior of the window saying, ‘Please don’t punch or kick the door.’ But a statement such as this is indeed shocking, but it speaks volumes about the increasingly fractured relationship between the public and the people working in one of the nation’s most trusted professions, the family doctor.

There has been a litany of problems that people have experienced trying to access their GP during the pandemic, and now it appears, that little has changed.

Practices were forced to swiftly adopt new ways of working after the Government urged them to increase the use of phone and video appointments, a necessary step needed to lessen the spread of infection among patients in waiting rooms and to protect staff during the first wave of COVID.

However, there are now concerns because there have been reports that some practices have all but shut up shop and are not seeing patients at all in person, and in some cases even getting a phone call from your GP is almost impossible and multiple patients are going under the radar and are not being treated correctly, and now trying to get into your surgery to see your GP is almost like trying to break into prison instead of out of one.

The situation still remains so serious that patients are being forced to go to A&E because they can’t get an appointment with their doctors, and some patients haven’t had blood pressure or a diabetes check-up for 18 months, and some patients with blood in their urine, intense ongoing stomach pain, unusual swellings under the skin and significant, unintentional weight loss were all offered telephone appointments only, despite repeated requests to see a doctor.

And many patients have told their stories anonymously, for fear of being blacklisted by practices for making complaints.

Under pandemic guidance, practices were advised to screen patients remotely first, a process known as triage, either in a telephone call with a receptionist or via an online form to determine whether they need a telephone appointment with a GP or could be dealt with by a nurse or pharmacist.

But there’s just no reason for so much of our lives being destroyed, it’s disgraceful.

How on earth can a GP examine someone over the phone, it’s utterly stupid, and some people are now selling off stuff to pay for a private diagnosis.

Boris Johnson should now demand that GPs who refuse to see patients shouldn’t be paid, then I’m quite sure the issue would resolve very quickly because they definitely shouldn’t be handed out bonuses for a job that they’re not doing, but that’s not going to happen because the Government are too weak to challenge anyone, and that’s why we’re in the state that we’re in now, but then the Government want to get rid of the NHS, so they don’t care either.

Our GPs have been missing in action, and some have a locked door policy with some receptionists who have been turning people away, and lots of patients who have had phone appointments have been incorrectly diagnosed, and have then finished up in hospital.

Some surgeries have even turned off their phone system and then if you go down there to see someone, you’re told to go and see a pharmacist. This is a national disgrace that will be remembered for decades.

An 83-Year-Old Man Dies After Becoming Trapped

A coroner has concluded that the death of a retired police officer whose head became trapped between the rails and mattress of his hospital bed was an avoidable accident.

Max Dingle, 83, died 15 minutes after he was discovered trapped in a ward at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital on May 3, 2020.

Concluding an inquest into Surrey born Max Dingle’s demise, a senior coroner found resuscitation hadn’t been attempted despite the pensioner electing for life-saving intervention and having a pulse when he was discovered.

Earlier this month, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, which runs the hospital, was fined £1,333,334 for failing to supply safe care to Max Dingle and another patient, whose case is not connected and who died in different circumstances.

Senior coroner John Ellery said Max Dingle, of Powys in mid-Wales, was initially admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath on April 27, 2020.

His medical records revealed he suffered from a heart condition, lymphoedema and sleep apnoea.

The coroner said that Max Dingle remained in the hospital until May 3, at 10 am, when he was discovered with his head trapped between the rails and mattress of his hospital bed.

The coroner said that Max Dingle had suffered a cardiac arrest, from which resuscitation wasn’t attempted, and he died at 10.15 am.

Nobody from the Hospital Trust attended the hearing but family members, including Max Dingle’s son Phil, dialled in from Australia.

Mr Ellery said an initial post mortem examination gave the cause of death as heart disease and didn’t consider the entrapment caused or contributed to Mr Dingle’s demise.

However, Mr Dingle’s son didn’t accept those conclusions and instead, commissioned expert consultant forensic pathologist Johan Duflou, from the University of Sydney, to review the findings and post mortem examination.

Professor Duflou gave the cause of death of entrapment with positional asphyxiation.

Mr Ellery said that after comparing and discussing their findings, both pathologists then agreed entrapment did play a considerable part in the cause of death.

An inquest was opened and adjourned while separate criminal proceedings against the NHS trust were carried out by health watchdog the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

The criminal inquiry ended this month after the trust admitted failings in connection with the care of two patients, including Max Dingle.

Concluding the inquest, Mr Ellery said that based on all the evidence, the findings of the inquest were that Max Dingle’s death was an avoidable accident.

I guess the moral of the story is don’t get ill and end up in the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, or anywhere else in the United Kingdom, especially if you’re over the age of fifty because the NHS is a disgrace, and then you get the default response from the NHS that ‘lessons have been learned’, unfortunately, they never are. Still clapping for the NHS, are we?

And it’s a sorry state of affairs when you’re safer at home than in the hospital.

Was there no one else on the ward to sound the alarm?

The trouble is that once you get past a certain age, you are deemed expendable to free up a bed. I’m surprised they’re not offering out lethal doses of morphine to speed things up.

The original coroner didn’t think that it played a part, which means that if Mr Dingle’s family didn’t have the funds to seek a private investigation this would have just been swept under the rug and disappeared. It doesn’t give you much faith in our health system, does it?

The poor man must have been in pain and awfully distressed with his head entrapped in the bed rail, yet nobody noticed, or did they just turn a blind eye?

Protection For Prince Harry’s Family While In The UK For Jubilee Is Guaranteed

Prince Harry received cast-iron assurances his family will be protected by specialist police when he touches down in the UK.

The Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan Markle are flying in from California with their own personal security detail but will become the Metropolitan Police’s responsibility when they disembark.

It will be only the second time Meghan Markle has returned to the United Kingdom in more than two years since the couple dramatically quit their royal positions in 2020.

The couple are bringing their two children Archie, three, and Lilibet, who turns one on Saturday.

Security sources have revealed the Met’s Royalty and Specialist Protection unit has spent weeks liaising with the Prince’s team and guaranteed taxpayer-funded officers.

Harry, 37, has been embroiled in a legal row with the Government over a Home Office decision to strip him of his UK security.

Lawyers for the Duke, who fled to Canada and later set up home in the US seeking financial independence, told the High Court he was unable to return home over fears it’s too risky.

Sources close to the Sussex camp said Harry was always in favour of returning to the United Kingdom for the celebrations.

The Duke even later made an offer to pay the Met for the protection of fully trained officers but was told they were not guns for hire.

In the US, the family are protected by a rotating 24-hour unit, understood to consist of up to 12 former special forces personnel and highly trained armed security professionals.

A source close to the Sussex camp said that for Harry, this has always been about protecting his family and that he’s been in regular communication with the applicable parties and made it extremely clear that he wouldn’t travel without obtaining cast-iron assurances over the safety of his family.

And he’s satisfied the right procedures are in place and they’re all very much looking forward to this week’s celebrations and of course getting to spend time with Her Majesty.

Harry and Meghan in early April enjoyed a brief private meeting with the 96-year-old monarch and each a 15-minute meeting with Prince Charles before they rushed off to the Invictus Games in The Netherlands.

The Duke and Duchess promised Her Majesty they would bring the children to see her in the immediate future, but Harry days later provoked anger among senior royals when he told an American broadcaster that he flew in to meet the Queen ahead of a trip to The Hague to make sure she was protected and had got the right people around her.

The pair have not only ignored the wishes of most UK citizens, but they’re also coming across regardless and British taxpayers are having to foot the bill for their protection.

I do like Harry, but I don’t see why the British taxpayer should be footing the bill for them to come over to the United Kingdom. He decided to leave his royal duties and go to another country and to be completely independent, but it seems to be when it suits him.

Why should the people of this country be saddled with protecting millionaires and billionaires while the people of this country are struggling and our Government is borrowing against our children’s future, it’s all very wrong?

However, it’s fair to say that these two are going to need it once in the United Kingdom because they’re really not liked much and people appear to do crazy things these days, so it’s understandable if they don’t feel safe, but then if they don’t feel safe, stay where you are and save our taxpayers some money.

MIND THE GAP

A 76-year-old woman with a 19-year-old boyfriend has gone viral on TikTok.

They say true love has no age, and one couple, from Italy, definitely has skimmed past that, with an age gap of 56 years.

Recently, Giuseppe D’Anna, 19, took the internet by storm, after announcing he’d proposed to his girlfriend, who is 76.

In the clip, that’s been viewed over a whopping 16.1 million times on social media, the young man can be seen kneeling on his right knee with more than a dozen huge balloons in the form of a heart and passionately smooching the lady.

“La nostra promessa” read the caption alongside the viral video, which in English translates to “Our promise”.

The next photo displayed an adorable image of the two, with Giuseppe sporting what appeared to be a gold chain and the bride to be holding a rose.

The 19-year-old, who’s collected near to 190,000 fans on TikTok, also shared a picture of a gorgeous ring.

Although the two may be in love, not everyone was on the same wavelength, with many guessing the true reasons Giuseppe might be seeing the woman, with some thinking that he was pursuing her will, while others were convinced he wanted a Sony PlayStation 5.

And after finding out their age, Giuseppe’s fiancee was also called his grandma on several occasions. However, he appears to be profoundly in love, as he shot back, saying that his love was beautiful, but someone said that she was literally old enough to be his great great grandmother.

But it’s not all negative, as the couple has also managed to gain some supportive fans, like this TikTok user who said that they shouldn’t listen to the hate, date whoever makes you happy, and love who you feel is right for you.

This isn’t the first time a couple with an age gap has gone viral on social media.

Earlier last year, one US couple with a 24 year age gap, took the internet by storm, after announcing they were engaged.

Despite the nasty comments which saw the 61-year-old woman being called the man’s grandma, the couple said the sex chemistry was fantastic, and have even set up a page to share their saucier NSFW content.

It actually is no one else business and they should just leave them alone. The problem is too many people think they’re missing out on something.

The thing is, if it was an old man with a young woman, people probably wouldn’t bat an eyelid, but turn it around and it becomes everyone’s business. If the lady is happy, then who are we to comment on it.

We see a lot of sad-looking young couples, and I’m sure her family are taking care of her family estate if she even has one, and if they get married the lady could always get a prenup, which would definitely show whether he’s in for the big haul or not, otherwise, he will just go running with his tail between his legs.

But people should really stop with the offensive remarks, it will either work or it won’t, either way, it’s none of our business, it’s their business.

There are plenty of 76-year-old men with younger women, look at Hugh Hefner, he was known for it and nobody really cared about that. This woman should enjoy the remainder of her life the way that she wants. They’re both above the legal age of consent, so they should just be left alone.

As long as they’re both happy and he’s not after her money, and let’s hope that he is genuinely in love with her, but if he’s not then he’s the one waking up to a senior citizen every morning, not us!

Children Who Live In Shipping Containers

A leading welfare official said that thousands of children are living in shipping containers or flats built cheaply in old office blocks.

The Children’s Commissioner said that they’re among 124,000 children living in temporary accommodation arranged by councils after their families became homeless.

Anne Longfield said children in homeless families were frequently put up in short term housing that’s dangerous, not fit to live in and usually far away from other family members, friends and schools.

But her report said only a minority of children in temporary accommodation remained there for long, and that three out of five had been found new homes with their families within six months, and only one in 20, about 6,000 children, were in temporary accommodation for a year or more.

Miss Longfield called on the Government to establish a large scale housebuilding programme, and she said that something had gone extremely wrong with the housing system when children were growing up in B&Bs, shipping containers and old office blocks.

She said that children had told them of the disruptive and at times frightening impact this can have on their lives and that it’s a disgrace that a nation as prosperous as ours is leaving tens of thousands of families in temporary accommodation for extended periods of time.

It’s believed there are more than 210,000 homeless children in England, of whom 124,000 are on the official homeless register and living in temporary housing, and a further 90,000 said to be sofa surfing families living with relatives or friends.

Housing Ministry figures say that of homeless people helped by councils last summer, six out of ten were single adults, while a further 26 per cent were lone-parent families and 8 per cent were couples with children.

Miss Longfield’s report said a recent development has been the repurposing of shipping containers, and that the units were typically one or two bedrooms and small in size, meaning that overcrowding can be a problem and that they could become hot in summer and too cold in the winter.

The report warned that households slipping behind on rent or mortgage payments could put another 375,000 children in England in danger of homelessness in the coming years.

The Local Government Association, the umbrella body for councils, said that the extreme shortage of social rented homes available, means councils have no option but to put families into temporary accommodation, including, in emergencies, bed and breakfasts.

The more serious problem is the lack of ventilation these buildings have which is causing mould and overheating, but these people don’t have a choice. On the other hand, I guess it’s better than sleeping on the streets, or in a run-down hostel.

These containers seem useful as a temporary measure but not for long term use, and they’re not just being used to house immigrants, they’re being used to house British people as well, each one still faces the same issues.

Sadly though the land of milk and honey is running out of milk and honey, and the containers aren’t great, but then beggars can’t be choosers, it’s that simple.

Charles Manson follower ‘Big Patty’ could be freed after spending 50 years behind bars

Patricia Krenwinkel, a defendant in the Tate murder case, enters the Los Angeles superior court for arraignment, which was postponed, to Feb. 24, 1970.

The Charles Manson follower known as Big Patty has been recommended for release after more than five decades behind bars.

Patricia Krenwinkel, 74, has been refused parole 14 times for the murders of pregnant actress Sharon Tate and four other people in 1969.

She helped kill grocer Leno LaBianca and his wife Rosemary the next night, using their blood to scribble ‘Helter Skelter’, ‘Rise’ and ‘Death to Pigs’ on the walls.

Krenwinkel claimed her actions came after Manson told her to do something ‘witchy’.

The recent recommendation by California’s parole board is the closest Krenwinkel has been to release.

The decision is likely to go to Governor Gavin Newsom for a definitive decision who’s previously denied parole requests for other followers of Manson, who died in prison aged 83 in 2017.

New laws since Krenwinkel was last refused parole in 2017 require the panel to consider that she committed the murders at a young age, 21, and is now an elderly inmate.

She claimed in 2017 that she was affected by battered women’s syndrome when she assisted in the bloody killings by the Manson Family cult.

Krenwinkel’s attorney Keith Wattley said his client was no longer a threat to society and added that she was completely transformed.

Krenwinkel was a 19-year-old secretary when she first encountered Manson, then 33, at a party, but the fact is the victims are still dead so there should be no parole, ever.

She met Charles Manson in Manhatten Beach in 1967, along with Lynette Fromme and Mary Brunner.

In later interviews, Krenwinkel stated that she had sex with Manson the first night they met and that he was the first person who told her she was beautiful.

Mesmerised by Manson’s allure and starved for attention, she chose to go to San Francisco with him and the other two girls, leaving behind her apartment, car, and last paycheck.

As the Manson Family grew, Katie, as Krenwinkel was now known and the others went on a drug and sex-filled 18-month tour of the American west in an old school bus.

She said they were just like wood nymphs and wood creatures and that they would run through the woods with flowers in their hair, and that Charles would have a small flute.

In the summer of 1968, Krenwinkel and fellow Family member Ella Bailey were hitchhiking around Los Angeles when Beach Boys founding member and drummer Dennis Wilson picked them up.

After being invited to his home while he continued on to a recording session, Krenwinkel and Bailey were able to contact the Family and tell them of their new crash pad.

When Wilson returned later that evening, he discovered Manson and the rest of the Family eating his food, sleeping in his bedrooms, and partying inside and outside his home. The group ended up staying for several months forcing Wilson into financial difficulties, but later Manson and the rest of the Family left his mansion.

Krenwinkel was a participant in the murders on August 9, 1969, at 10050 Cielo Drive, home of actress Sharon Tate and her husband, director Roman Polanski.

After stabbing Abigail Folger, Krenwinkel went back inside and summoned Tex Watson, who also stabbed Folger.

During her trial, Krenwinkel said that she stabbed her and kept stabbing her, and when asked how it felt, she responded that she felt nothing.

Krenwinkel participated willingly in more murders the following night, and along with Manson, Watson, Atkins, Clem Grogan, Leslie Van Houen and Linda Kasabian, Krenwinkel went to the home of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca where Krenwinkel, Watson and Van Houten killed the couple.

The Tate-LaBianca killings were a string of murders committed by members of the Manson Family during August 8-10, 1969, in Los Angeles, California, United States, under the leadership of Tex Watson and Charles Manson.

The perpetrators first slaughtered five people on the night of August 8-9 – pregnant actress Sharon Tate and her friends Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger, Wojciech Frykowski, and Steven Parent.

The child that Sharon Tate was pregnant with later perished of asphyxiation in Tate’s womb.

Manson was allegedly dissatisfied with the messy operation of those slayings, and after, the Family then also killed supermarket executive Leno LaBianca and his wife Rosemary in the Los Feliz section of Los Angeles.

Sharon Tate’s baby, if still alive would have been younger than me, and what might have been if she was alive now, but instead it was a life that was taken away, and this should strike terror in people because this kind of thing could easily happen again, and Krenwinkel should never be freed from prison because fifty years for the deaths of five people and an unborn child just isn’t enough.

It’s fair to say that Krenwinkel could have been transformed in jail, but nevertheless, she still couldn’t have paid her debt to society, especially when you’re taking the life of another human being and she should be kept in prison.

And let’s face it after spending all that time in jail she would have no understanding of how our current society has changed over the years and how to support herself.

She killed an unborn child and its mother. The child would be 50 years old now if the baby were still alive, so Krenwinkel serves no purpose in our society and it would be better that she stay in prison knowing that she has lived longer than those whose lives she took.

Sue Gray Report: ‘I Wish I’d Taken A Fine To Be With My Dying Husband’

“I wish I hadn’t followed the rules, I’d have taken the fine,” Sara said, adding she would have given anything to spend more time with her dying husband.

She told BBC 5 Live she obeyed the rules because she thought the government was doing the right thing, and like many of those bereaved by COVID, she’s furious at the disclosures in the Sue Gray report into Westminster parties during the lockdown.

Boris Johnson said he took full responsibility and was humbled.

Sara, who’s from Surrey but asked for her full name not to be used, said she’d been unable to go with her husband Tony, 59, when he was rushed to hospital during the first lockdown, back in 2020, and even though she was allowed to visit him briefly, the rules at the time meant she had to leave after a few hours and he passed away when she wasn’t with him.

She said that she would have taken the fine because that’s what Mr Johnson seems to have done. He didn’t obey the rules, his staff didn’t obey the rules, and they’ve taken the fine.

Sara, 60, said she’d been distraught but had listened to the government’s messages and obeyed the rules.

She said that she followed the rules and she wishes that she hadn’t. She said neither of her children could be there, they had to Facetime their father, and that their last memory of their father was to Facetime him and that her last memory of him was him saying that he would see her the following morning.

She said that one of the events, on 20 May when they had the ‘bring your own beer’ event, was the day she buried her husband and she just had her children with her and that it just wasn’t acceptable, and she said that she would have given anything for that extra time to have been with her husband.

She said it wasn’t just about a few drinks, it was about the credibility of the government, and said that Downing Street and the office of the Prime Minister had been brought into disrepute.

Sara isn’t alone in her outrage, the campaign group COVID 19 Bereaved Families for Justice says the Prime Minister had treated them like dirt and as an inconvenience.

Group spokesman Lobby Akinnola, whose father Olufemi Akinnola died as a result of coronavirus in April 2020 aged 60, said that when they were texting colleagues about getting away with it, people were having to text their families telling them they couldn’t come to their loved ones’ funerals.

He said the messages in the report show they knew how disrespectful they were being to the families they were failing, but that didn’t worry them.

He said they’re not satisfied with partying whilst he failed to protect our loved ones, the Prime Minister has now spent months ignoring and lying to the people.

Safiah Ngah, 29, called for Boris Johnson to quit over the wild and uncivilised behaviour in Downing Street.

She told the PA news agency restrictions in place last February meant she was unable to say a final goodbye in person to her 68-year-old father Zahari Ngah.

Her family had to settle for a video call as their last contact while government officials were cheers-ing, partying and joking about getting away with it.

Not only that, these freeloaders are getting paid by the taxpayer to have these parties. People couldn’t attend a funeral because Boris Johnson said so, but they could party it up when they wanted to, despicable behaviour from our government.

However, events which occurred are what happens in many bars within Westminster every day of the week. This behaviour is unacceptable and all these bars need to be removed. Westminster is a place of employment, not a social assemblage for boozing MPs and the Prime Minister of our country. The problem is, Westminster isn’t a place of work anymore, it’s just a place to jolly themselves.

There are a lot of people who want him gone, but he just won’t budge, so it seems for the time being we’re stuck with him.

He is a shameless and vile Prime Minister, and it appears that there are people out there that will swallow plenty more of his lies in the next couple of years.

Boris Johnson and his co-workers seemed to forget about the dying people who contracted COVID, while they partied and got their rocks off while people mourned for the loved ones that they lost in the pandemic. Fool me once Boris, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on you Boris Johnson.

Boris Johnson has been taking the piddle out of us, and he needs to go now, but the question nobody appears to have asked is why Boris Johnson even thought it would be safe to mix with people during this deadly pandemic, especially when he himself was in the hospital with the virus, or was that just a PR stunt?

Boris Johnson just saying sorry isn’t enough because he will just turn around and do it all over again, and now he’s just beyond a joke, and he should resign because he was only ever a wannabe Prime Minister and now he’s proved himself to be the biggest slimeball ever.

He evidently fibbed when he said he was unaware of any parties, having been photographed swigging wine at a leaving drinks party. How stupid does Boris Johnson think the public is or is that what he’s counting on? That the people are that stupid.

So, once again the rules have been totally ignored by the government, with the full knowledge that the British public can do nothing about it.

All government parties are as bad as the next, no matter what side they sit on because politicians are like nappies, they smell and they need to be changed regularly.

Doctor, 72, Who Sexually Abused 47 Women And Girls, Sentenced To 12 Years In Prison

A retired doctor convicted of sex offences against 47 women over more than three decades has been imprisoned for 12 years.

Krishna Singh, 72, was convicted of 54 charges, mainly of indecent and sexual assault, following a trial at the High Court in Glasgow which ended last month.

The crimes occurred between January 1984 and 2018, mainly at a medical practice in North Lanarkshire but also at a police office and a hospital accident and emergency department.

The married GP, who was awarded an MBE for medical services, also targeted girls under 16 and pregnant women who went to his surgery in Coatbridge, Lanarkshire.

His actions included kissing and hugging patients, touching their breasts and making improper comments to them.

Sentencing Singh when he appeared at the High Court in Glasgow on Wednesday, Lord Armstrong said that he had been convicted after trial of 54 charges of calculated and manipulative sexual abuse of 47 women and girls in relation to who, as a general practitioner, he was in a clear position of trust.

He said that Singh had committed the offences against his female patients persistently over a span of 34 years.

He said that Singh had breached his position of trust and carried out unwarranted examinations, telling him that he undermined the trust of the medical profession by eroding the trust that women would have had.

Lord Armstrong said that victim impact statements revealed that Singh’s actions had a devastating effect on his victims, some of whom now had a mistrust of the medical profession while others had suffered depression, low self-esteem and anxiety.

He condemned the 72-year-old to 12 years behind bars and placed him on the sex offenders register.

Singh’s defence agent, Janice Green, said he’d expressed extreme regret at his actions.

She said that Dr Singh knows that custody is the only disposal fitting given the serious breach of trust and that the gravity of the offences stems from that breach of trust. Yet, the 72-year-old had denied the charges against him.

Singh qualified as a doctor in India in 1974, and he registered with the General Medical Council as a doctor in November 1976 before taking up a job as a GP at a practice in North Lanarkshire, where he remained until 2018.

Singh also took up a position as a police casualty surgeon between 2005 and 2010 in Scotland, during which he examined people in custody.

This appears to be a health system that has failed for so many decades and for so many victims, and Mr Singh is an absolutely disgusting person who should have been handed down a more extended custodial punishment.

Health And Safety Concerns Force School Closure

A school has been closed over health and safety concerns after a schoolboy lost his finger running from his oppressors, and well-wishers raise more than £94,000 to help his recovery.

Education chiefs closed the campus after Raheem Bailey, 11, had six hours of surgery on his injured hand when he attempted to escape his oppressors, and got his finger caught in a fence.

The child had complained about students being mean to him after starting at 1,600 pupil Abertillery Learning Community in Gwent.

The school trust closed all of its campuses on health and safety grounds while an investigation takes place.

In a statement, Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council said that Abertillery Learning Community was working with Gwent Police in relation to an ongoing inquiry into an apparent attack on the secondary campus, and it said that all campuses at Abertillery Learning Community would be closed on health and safety grounds.

It said that students will access blended education on Monday, 23rd May. The safety and well-being of students and staff remain of paramount importance to the Learning Community and the Local Authority at all times.

The closure comes after Raheem called his mother Shantal Bailey crying in pain before being taken to the hospital.

Mother of four Ms Bailey said that on Tuesday morning break time, Raheem was attacked and beaten by a bunch of children whilst in school.

He was forced to the ground and then repeatedly booted, but he made a desperate attempt to flee the school grounds in order to escape the situation but caught his finger.

His mother said that she received a phone call from Raheem and then the school notifying her of the incident.

In attempting to mount a fence and escape, Raheem broke his finger. He underwent six hours of surgery, but it had to be amputated.

Raheem was taken to a hospital 50 miles away in Swansea but doctors were unable to save his finger.

His heartbroken mother said her son had suffered racial and physical abuse since starting at the school last September, and she’s now raised more than £94,000 through GoFundMe for a prosthetic finger and to help Raheem on the road to recovery.

Ms Bailey said she was very grateful for the charity shown by so many towards Raheem.

She said the kind messages had boosted the spirit of the young boy who she said was still occasionally feeling extremely down because of the bullying he’d received.

Surely it would make more sense to remove these bullies from the school?

Bullying is a behaviour that’s historically been linked to children on the playground, but it can occur among people of any age in any setting, so the primary question is why do people bully others?

The driving forces behind bullying can alter from person to person, but bullies share some common traits.

Some bully because they know it gets them what they want, while others bully because they’re extremely insecure, but no matter the reason, bullying is unacceptable, regardless of where it takes place, and bullies usually target people who are younger or smaller than they are, who work as their subordinates, or who belong to marginalised or minority groups.

Sometimes, even jealousy motivates people who bully, and bullying exists on a spectrum because not all bullies resort to hitting or name-calling, as children are known to do.

Sophisticated adult bullies may engage in smear campaigns against their targets rather than insult them to their faces, they might even enlist other bullies to target on their behalf. However, a bully’s end goal is to humiliate or hurt other people with the intent of destroying their reputation or life.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started