THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

A Tesco store in Edinburgh has been cited of discriminating against state school children by making them line outside whilst private school students are permitted to come and go as they please. It has been alleged that pupils from Boroughmuir high school, bordering the city centre, were made to stand behind a barrier by Tesco workers and only permitted to access their local store in tiny assemblies.

However, pupils at the nearby George Watson’s college were not stopped at all. The problem was established by a parent of one kid at the state school, who stated it was a form of discrimination.

Everyone should line up or nobody should. It should not matter what school you come from, otherwise, it becomes bigotry.

On student who is at Boroughmuir, had to stand in the line each day. He was not one to fuss however, it was getting him down. He and his friends were frustrated since they had to remain outside while others went before of them. Tesco further guards the entrance in that they have a person there, making certain they line up.

Pupils were rather annoyed about the situation, but it’s very good that someone is ultimately sticking up for them, and they don’t want to get into trouble or to show their school in a poor light but they just believe it is wrong. Once they attempted to walk in behind a crowd of pupils from George Watson’s college. A team affiliate granted him, but not the Watson’s boys, out of the shop.

A post of criticism was put on Twitter last week and a Tesco spokesperson replied with a list of tweets. Basically, it is stated that the private school has a lesser number of children, which is faster and simpler for the store.

I find this really difficult to understand as most meager shops permit school children into their premises, however, if there are several kids, throughout lunch time recess or after school, the store will then allow two children in at a time.

Nevertheless, they don’t confine them like animals, they just make them remain outside until two come out and then two go in. It’s not rocket science, and I really believed that Tesco had more intellect than that, but apparently not, and think that prejudice is a good thing.

Not really, considering the founder of Tesco was a Jew, and I guess that Jack Cohen would be turning in his grave right about now. I know that Jack Cohen was born in 1898, and prejudice was prevalent back then, and it appears that nothing has improved since then, one would have assumed that we would have moved forth, but nobody should be victimized, so obviously things have not improved.

The Investigatory Powers Bill, or as it has been more aptly called, the Snooper’s Charter, is now as good as passed. It just requires Royal Assent before it becomes law. Therefore before you Google something, here’s the full list of agencies that can now ask for any UK citizen’s browsing history, as outlined in Schedule 4 of the bill:

Police forces maintained under section 2 of the Police Act 1996
Metropolitan police force
City of London police force
Police Service of Scotland
Police Service of Northern Ireland
British Transport Police
Ministry of Defence Police
Royal Navy Police
Royal Military Police
Royal Air Force Police
Security Service
Secret Intelligence Service
GCHQ
Ministry of Defence
Department of Health
Home Office
Ministry of Justice
National Crime Agency
HM Revenue & Customs
Department for Transport
Department for Work and Pensions
An ambulance trust in England
Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service
Competition and Markets Authority
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Department for Communities in Northern Ireland
Department of the Economy in Northern Ireland
Department of Justice in Northern Ireland
Financial Conduct Authority
Fire and rescue authorities under the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004
Food Standards Agency
Food Standards Scotland
Gambling Commission
Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority
Health and Safety Executive
Independent Police Complaints Commissioner
Information Commissioner
NHS Business Services Authority
Northern Ireland Ambulance Service Health and Social Care Trust
Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service Board
Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Regional Business Services Organisation
Office of Communications
Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
Police Investigations and Review Commissioner
Scottish Ambulance Service Board
Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
Serious Fraud Office
Welsh Ambulance Services National Health Service Trust

 

If you care about this and don’t want it to get in, you should sign the petition here:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/173199

Everybody will be able to view your complete internet records, comprising the taxman, DWP, and Food Standards Agency. As the Investigatory Powers Bill establishes into legislation, internet providers will be obliged to retain a complete history of each site that all of its clients has toured.

Organisations comprising the Food Standards Agency and the Department for Work and Pensions will be capable of seeing UK residents’ complete internet browsing history inside weeks. The Investigatory Powers Bill, which was all but legislated into law this week, requires internet providers to retain a complete record of internet connection records (ICRs) for a year and to make them accessible to the Government if required.

Those ICRs in effect serve as a complete list of each website that people have visited, rather than accumulating which particular pages are toured or what’s done on them. ICRs will be made accessible to a broad variety of government organizations.

Those cover expected law enforcement organisations such as the police, the military, and the secret service, but additionally comprises organisations such as the Food Standards Agency, the Gambling Commission, councils and the Welsh Ambulance Services National Health Service Trust.

The corresponding part of the Bill further specifies the lowest office or rank that each person within those organisations must be if they want access to the records. In the police, for example, any viewer must be at least an inspector or a superintendent.

Consequently, the DWP will be watching the sick and the disabled to see how long they go online, any longer than ten minutes and they will declare them fit for work. Or the unemployed to view if they are only utilizing job sites 24 hours a day to obtain work, anything else and they get sanctioned.

HMRC will further be watching ebay for none payment of income tax. I get how the officials might want to look at records of where people have been touring on the internet, however, what bothers me is the fact that that the prying into people’s lives has no administrative oversight.

When you give agencies the powers to authorise their individual snooping, it ends up being exploited and utilised for petty things. A council, for instance, put an entire family under scrutiny because they believed they weren’t residing in the catchment region of a school, the children as well as the grown-ups.

It should be utilised for actually finding subversives and dangerous offenders.

The nobody has the right to encroach on somebody else’s personal life, and by snooping into another person’s private life, which then makes us vulnerable. It bothers me since once they can pry into our private affairs, they have complete authority over us and we need to take that on board, and not just go along with it.

We must endure and face the powers that be, we must wake up and smell the coffee, if we fall asleep, they will ultimately put us each into a unconscious state. We must be the weapons of war, be our own destiny, and not for somebody else to make it for us.

It appears exhausting, I know, but we need to fight against the establishment before they bleed us of all that we have. If we just give up now, then, in the end, we will have nothing, we will just continue to exist.

We should not have to haggle with the establishment, but still, we require the strength to do so. If they are not going to be compliant, then neither should we, and we should be inflexible and obtain the upper hand. We should not permit them to deceive us and fleece us of everything right that we have.

To strip us of our freedoms, and treat us less than human beings, is the image of complete and absolute servitude. Therefore, once again we must adapt but not for their advantage, but for our own. We need to open our eyes and be sharp because at the moment we are dying because we are voiceless and inarticulate and the consequences of that will be catastrophic.

Continue reading “Buckingham Palace To Get £369m Repair”

I noticed on facebook that a number of people from the Basildon District area had applied for housing because of special needs for their children or because they themselves were disabled. It used to be a very standard procedure when applying for housing because one might need a bigger home because they had more children, or because one might have become disabled, they simply filled out an application, it was sent off with the documents that were required and they went onto the housing register and waited.

Presently all has to be done online by way of the Internet, so you’re generally bolloxed if you are old and don’t have the internet, and have to rely on somebody else to do it for you.

I was filling out a questionnaire online for somebody a few of weeks ago, I won’t go into who it was for, as that would trespass into their privacy, and I’m not in the practice of doing things like that, contrary the council who desired to the know the ins and outs of this person, and their life, who I was doing the application for.

I am what I would call pretty internet friendly, therefore I felt that it would be a breeze filling in one of these forms, but crikey, was I mistaken. It took me three hours to fill in, and in the end. I was starting to tear my hair out!

Online application times out every 30 minutes, so if you’re not a highly skilled typer, it times out before you have even completed the page and you have to begin the page all over again. Fortunately for me I am a rather fast typer, however, as the person, I was filling the application out for had a bunch of stuff to put in, it still timed me out, and oh dear I had to begin the page all over again, therefore why it took me three hours to do.

I was browsing through many of the remarks that people had put concerning their housing application, and one woman had said that she had been turned down for housing, which I was completely devastated because of her child’s requirements.

One woman put. “My daughter is severely disabled and we’ve been refused. Currently appealing”.

She went on to say, following a woman asking her what she had been denied on, and she went on to state that she has a two bedroom house without currently a way to get her child upstairs. She has 2 children, one that is disabled, who can’t walk or talk and suffers from epilepsy.

The house is modified however owing to bedroom dimensions and the way they have had to adjust the quarters they can’t currently use the adaptions, and the council has declined them a modified three bed, stating that they don’t require it on medical grounds.

The woman was denied her application and was posted a letter saying that she had the right to appeal and to send in more supporting documents, so she emailed them affirming her reasons, with five letters from experts.

We realize that there is a housing deficit, but the difference, in this case, is that this woman has a disabled child, who can’t walk, or talk, and suffers from epilepsy, and she has five letters from specialists, isn’t this sufficient evidence, or do you really have to be dead before you are given something?

Obviously, Basildon Council wants your blood before they give you something. Furthermore, it beggars belief to suggest that the council will not house a family that has a disabled child and that child can’t get up the stairs, despite the fact that adaptations had been made to the home.

Consequently, when the council did the modifications, they simply did not take other things into reckoning, and it was a misuse of funds on the modifications in the first place, when really they may as well have simply rehoused this family into a home that would have been more fitting, like a bungalow without any stairs.

The problem is, the council has too many departments operating on various matters, and the one hand doesn’t know what another hand is doing, in other words, there is a total and absolute cock up going on in the offices at Basildon District Council.

Plainly, the alterations that Basildon Council did for this family were of no value to them, and actually somebody in the council should have attended the home and speculated about what was going on, and acted respectively, but apparently they thought they were cutting corners when making these modifications, and in the long run, it will end up costing them more capital than they first thought.

It will not make any difference to the council to rehouse this family to a more fitting home for ie a bungalow. This family would just move out of one home into another, leaving that home vacant for somebody else to move into.

Consequently, the council will not lose out on a home, they will just have to make adjustments to the home that the family will be moving out of, which of course will cost the council more money, but had they done their job properly in the first place, they wouldn’t have wasted any capital at all.

This is not the family’s dilemma, nor did they create the problem, the council did, therefore, why should this family suffer for the councils total cock up?

Immigration. That’s what we hear, that’s one of the central battlegrounds of the future EU referendum. It’s everywhere. Everyone is declaring that they’re taking our jobs. They’re stealing our benefits They’re killing our national identity. Curse those emigrants. There nothing but trouble.

It’s correct, there is little disputing how the 1992 Maastricht Treaty forced European borders to free passage of people, sparking an increase in European emigrants coming into the United Kingdom. Of this, there is no uncertainty.

Furthermore, let’s not pretend there are no concerns resulting from such changes, and it would be ill-advised to do so. We can call on Joanne Harris’s Chocolat Effect to see that when others come into a neighborhood with their different ways, they can start to shape the foundation of that community.

Plus now, with other nationalities bringing their individual cultures, languages, and ways of doing things, there will unquestionably be changes we witness on the streets of our communities, cities, and towns.

Plus it does become a numbers contest, the more newcomers that come, the more everything can be replaced, the more our distinguished British values will gradually change in front of our very eyes, whether they be queuing customs, driving customs, social conduct customs, whether it be communication obstacles in the classroom, at the doctor’s surgery, or in the supermarket.

New patterns of behavior have been adjusted and different foods have arrived on our high streets. Unquestionably, things have changed, the start of Polski schlep into our vocabulary is proof enough of it.

It becomes less when in Rome and more if you can’t beat them, join them.

My great grandmother came to Great Britain when she was a young teen from Russia because of the anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire. She and her two sisters put down roots, together with other Jews that were immigrants at the time.

However, there was still anti-Semitism even back then. In Britain, too, Jews were classified as a negative unrest within the nation, and they figured extensively as an advocate of representative government. In addition, Jews were continuously used as a negative foil for the meaning of what was English or British.

It is likely that throughout the ages, nothing much will improve since people don’t like reform, clearly, change is not sound. Nevertheless, when I was growing up, there were no corner shops that opened until the early hours of the morning, in some areas, or at least 7am until 7pm at night.

Presently we definitely rely on those corners stores, and if they disappeared from our neighborhoods, people would not know what to do. We rely on those stores, even though we whine that they are operated by newcomers, therefore we literally have no right to whine about them.

We appear to have separated ourselves from communities completely, though previously, societies held collectively, supported each other, nursed the weak and sick, and looked after each other’s kids when it was required.

We Britain’s were a force to be reckoned with, we were an assertive nation, and we attempted to stay away from hatred, particularly following the second world war. It took a long time to clean up the mayhem that was created by Hitler, and we should have learned from it.

Now all our government wants to do is go to war with other nations, and its weird that America wants to provide arms to other countries so that they can blow themselves up, and for some strange reason we get the blame for it in the United Kingdom, but of course, we are just as much to blame.

British firms ship military devices and technologies to handfuls of nations globally. Figures published prove what shipments are made and to who. In 2011, export Licenses were given for 45 different kinds of shipment to Egypt, 43 to Saudi Arabia and 38 to Iraq.

Licenses were given for the shipping of 10 types of weaponry and munitions to Saudi Arabia, comprising sniper rifles and submachine rifles. Things have not improved following World war 2.

The issue, nevertheless, actually, is how much of this is a dilemma? Or to put it another way, what aspects of our culture are we really striving to protect? After all, according to the newest developments from the Council of Europe, England and Wales have the largest prison population in Europe, balancing squarely with the United Kingdom, having some of the greatest rates of car robberies, brutal attacks, thefts and dog attacks in Western Europe.

This certainly shouldn’t be defended. Furthermore, in terms of education, according to the PISA report 2016, the United Kingdom has literacy rates behind Lithuania, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Hungry.

Plus, the most struggling assembly is the ethnic assembly illustrated as white British. Again, something we certainly should try to improve. And in terms of health, according to the Food and Agriculture Organisation of The United Nations, Britain exceeds the list of the most overweight countries in the European Union.

In short, the United Kingdom has multiple problems inside its personal culture that we should not be proud of, and for which the small symmetry of immigrants coming into the realm cannot possibly be condemned.

Many of our difficulties are home-grown, they come from within. So let’s be realistic about this, the actual problem is not immigration. It might be a sideshow, however, it surely is not the central issue.

Immigration is not the source of all the evils in our society today. The true problem is that we, as a society, appear to be refusing to face up to the reality that our own citizens are far more accountable for the decay of what is good and grand about Britain.

The answer is not to be distracted by where people are from or what color their skin is or what doctrine hovers around their neck. These things distract from the actual point. What we should be concentrating on who is ready to roll up their sleeves, dig in, live by the law, look after their well-being, make the effort in our schools, and make our society cohesive in a way that serves for all of us, one that is secure for our children, nonviolent for our aging, and cleaner for our tomorrow.

And we can only do this if we work collectively and support each other. If we talk with one another and get to know the people in our towns, wherever they’re from. We each of us must support the lady next door and look after our neighborhood parks.

We collectively must ride mindfully through our roads and not bait our dogs. We communally must keep our roads clean and consider those around us. These are the things we should care about. These are the things we should embrace, our shared values.

It’s our collective duty to do so. Furthermore, we all need to buy in. As a nation, collectively. Since these are the things which are so frequently missing in our culture today. These are the things which are letting us down.

Furthermore, pulling up the EU drawbridge will not resolve our difficulties; it will just change the people we accuse. However, change, as they state, must begin at home. Additionally, there are lots that remain sound and excellent about Britain, it is solid, it is flourishing, it has an antiquity of freedom and liberty, and it is kind and generous. Additionally, we should be pleased that people want to come and live here.

Nevertheless, England is a pretty small place, and we can’t possibly provide for everybody. It’s not a case of not wanting people from other countries to come and live here, it’s a point that this is a really small country, and we cannot fit everyone in.

The land size of the United States is so immense, the whole of the United Kingdom could fit within it more than 40 times over. Whilst Russia, with the greatest land mass of any nation, is 8.5 million times larger than one of the smallest, Monaco.

Nevertheless, immigrants are not to blame. When nations that are under distress require assistance, they will go wherever to get away from that crisis, it is simply survival of the fittest, and they are escaping to preserve their life – can anyone blame them?

If we were in the equivalent position, and Great Britain was in the same position, we would do precisely the same, not only for ourselves but for our children, and it’s an animal impulse to flee from whatever is threatening, and take solitude anywhere they can.

Why would you stay in a country, even if it is your homeland to be blown up? You would want to shield your children, your family, and rightly so. After all, it’s an extremely solemn business, the continuation of your people, that’s why in countries like Africa, woman have more babies. Since, people from those countries, the survival percentage is lower, and more children die young, therefore, they tend to birth larger. amounts of babies.

However, for countless immigrants, the United Kingdom is a core for migrants attempting to find work and people wishing to further their studies. Work and study star quite profoundly as the grounds given by the 526,000 migrants who came to the United Kingdom in 2013.

The number of migrants traveling to Britain for family purposes from outside of the EU did decline, although the numbers have since started to rise. Work is usually quoted as the chief reason migrants come to the United Kingdom. Plus people traveling to the United Kingdom for work incentives is the biggest and fastest-growing category of immigrants.

However, this has not invariably been the cause. In 2011, 232,000 people traveled to the United Kingdom for formal education compared to 184,000 who came here to work. This has shifted since then and in 2013, 177,000 came here to study compared to 214,000 people who came here to work.

This does not imply that our education system is better, it just implies that our education system is better than theirs.

Tightening up visa controls would change how many people come into the United Kingdom.

Immigration is a typical part of an open economy and culture. The difficulty is the current measure of immigration, almost half of it now from the EU, which is just unsustainable. All nations have border restrictions and procedures about who to accept and who to turn away.

The important policy questions are about who and how many people are good for the United Kingdom, and Immigration procedures, just like any other policy area, should be conducted in the best interests of the United Kingdom.

We understand that most migrants come here for a very logical goal, to seek to better their lives and that many make a real contribution to our society and to culture. The problem is the scale that immigration has presently reached with severe results for the proportion of our population and for the ability of our public services to cope.

Great levels of net migration to the United Kingdom are a comparatively new happening. The United Kingdom has periodically encountered stages of immigration, however, never on this current scale. High net migration has produced in fast population increase. The UK population currently stands at about 65 million.

On a large migration situation, which estimates net migration of 265,000, outlines that the UK population will soon grow by about 500,000 a year, the equivalent of a new city the area of Liverpool each year.

This is unsustainable. It would result in the population increasing by almost eight million over the next fifteen years bringing it to 73 million. 75% of this development will be down to future migrants and their children.

The residual population increase will come from the United Kingdom’s existing population, comprising births to immigrants now here. Population growth would not end there. It would proceed to rise towards 80 million in 25 years and continue going upwards.

The United Kingdom is already densely populated by international standards and has a continuing lack of housing. England is twice as crowded as Germany and almost four times as congested as France. To cope with this population boom large sums will have to be used for the development of school places, roads, rail, health and other infrastructure.

This is at a moment when the government is operating a budget deficit and tries to decrease public spending over the long term. Enhanced migration will not create the additional tax income required to meet for such infrastructure development.

The only important inquiry ever administered in the United Kingdom into the financial influence of immigration was carried out by the Select Committee on Economic Affairs of the House of Lords in 2007/08. In April 2008 they reported that the overall economic impact of immigration is expected to be meager, although this disguises important differences across various immigrant groups.

These conclusions have been confirmed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development which noticed in its yearly statement that accounts for the economic consequence of immigration vary, though in most nations it serves to be modest in terms of Gross domestic product and is about zero on average across OECD nations.

The UK economy is presently in a phase of financial increase that was determined by the Office of Budget Responsibility in 2015 to extend over the next few years. Mass immigration contributes to this increase, only because more people make for a healthier market.

This is why it is normal to understand the debate that immigration is great for the marketplace since it raises GDP. Nevertheless, it does not significantly boost GDP per head so does not significantly make for a healthier economy.

The most current Office for Budget Responsibility report estimated that prevailing raised levels of net migration would continue and that this further inflow would total no more than a tenth of one percent of GDP per head of the population. The House of Lords report previously referred to said that they had seen no proof for the debate, made by the government, business and various others, that net immigration, immigration minus emigration, produces notable financial gains for the present UK people.

The expanding marketplace is generating further work opportunities and the numbers of both UK born and migrants in work are rising, however, the vast supply of labour from overseas has been compared with sustained flat growth in wages as businesses have not had to give higher salaries.

Mass immigration is perhaps holding back salaries for those in direct opposition to work, which is usually those who are already economically paid, both British native and former migrants alike. A comparison conducted by the Bank of England recently concluded that the immigrant-native proportion has little bearing on the average occupational salary comparisons of that region and that the greatest influences were seen in the semi and unskilled services division.

Public sentiment is obvious. A vast majority of society want to see immigration reduced. That covers voters of all ethnicities. This is hardly surprising as we all share the same concerns about housing, schools, and the health service.

The higher number of new immigrants, the more challenging it is for everybody to become completely integrated into British society, and it was predicted back in 2005 that the United Kingdom was sleepwalking into segregation.

We are not a well-organised nation since there are no building blocks, and we appear to be at our weakest position, and we are gradually sinking. We appear to have various responses from different people about immigration, some state that they agree with it, some state that they don’t, most don’t.

Nonetheless, we as a nation, the people, people that work, don’t work, disabled or retired appear to have much to say regarding various matters, yet we rarely do anything regarding it. People appear to believe that they can express their way of thinking, however, it’s not essential to do anything regarding it.

You can’t have an appraisal over something if one is not ready to do something about it, if you have something to voice, then it’s important enough to do something about it since nothing is hopeless, and by going ahead with something that we feel strongly about could really end up being successful.

People will tell you it’s not feasible to do something since it will end up being wrong for you, except what if it isn’t? What if it really ended up being beneficial for us as a country? Would that not make us very pleased with what we had become since we had made it that way, and not the government?

Of course, as far as the government are concerned the individuals of this nation babble total and absolute garbage, and we have no concept of how this nation should be run! I beg to disagree with that notion, and I proclaim that we as a country know favorably than everyone else how this nation should be run, recognizing we are the ones that have to survive and endure in it.

Therefore, if that is the case, then shouldn’t we as the people of the country be permitted to determine our future? After all, it’s our continuation that the government is messing about with like some entertainment. We are not pawns on a chess board, we are human beings, and hence should be treated as such, and if that indicates that we should choose our own future, then so be it.

After all, it is stated that “The meek shall inherit the earth” Not Theresa May and her Tory electorates.

Homeowners have displayed their outrage that the tents of the homeless are being removed by Milton Keynes Council, and some have even had eviction notices put on them, despite these tents being distributed by charities and organizations working to support destitute people in the city.

The problem was highlighted and discussed for hours at a Housing and Community Committee at Milton Keynes Council Civic Offices last night Thursday (July 14). The meeting’s purpose was to address the ‘One Stop Shop’ for homeless people suggested in Milton Keynes Councils 2016/17 and projected draft.

Though numerous residents and councilors back the ideas, there were some concerns mounted. It’s a real concern, and a misuse of resources, providing people tents and then the Council coming along and removing them.

The cash used on tents by organizations and charities could be going on a night shelter. The Council has even put removal notifications on tents, and often homeless people have not only lost all their possessions that were within the tent but further lost family photos when they were removed.

The destruction of one’s property goes against their civil liberties. The right to property or freedom to own property is usually listed as a human right for a normal person concerning their properties. It recognizes a right for natural and legal persons to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

The right to property is one of the most questionable human rights, both in terms of its existence and understanding. Everybody has the freedom to own property, and no one should be arbitrarily denied his property.

The problem is, the area that the tents are on is not theirs, so ultimately they would have to leave, but where are they supposed to go to? Obviously, nobody cares, no pressure of course, simply let them get on with it, out of sight, out of mind.

However, whoever is driving them from their tents could at least do it with a modicum of dignity. There is the moment a woman is pulled from a tent as bailiffs remove people from The Ark homeless shelter. Rough sleepers fighting with bailiffs and police as they were being removed from the self-serving community on Friday morning.

A number of the camp’s inhabitants were captured on camera tussling with police, as problems blazed when a camp member was violently expelled from her tent. She later collapsed and was rushed to the hospital in an ambulance.

Members of the camp protested they had been given no notice that they were to be turfed off the land. Some stated that bailiffs had handled them with brute strength to move them on, whilst others maintained that their possessions had been launched into bins.

Where are they supposed to go? What’s transpired is a travesty and sickening. They have nowhere to live and nowhere secure to make a foundation now. They were required to remove the shelter in 30 minutes, no one cares about them, only their image.

All human beings are born free and equal. You are worth the same and have equal freedoms as anybody else. You are born with the intelligence to think and to know right from wrong and should behave toward others in a sense of kindness.

Everybody should have all of the liberties and freedoms in this statement, no matter what color, sex, or appearance he or she may be. It shouldn’t matter where you were born, what dialect you speak, what faith you are, what political beliefs you have, or whether you’re wealthy or destitute. Everybody should have all of the equities in this statement.

Everybody has the freedom to live, to be free, and to feel secure. No one should be held in slavery for any cause. The purchasing and trading of human beings should be restricted at all times. However, that’s not correct either, since it might seem that we are free on the surface, but we need to actually examine beneath the surface.

Contemporary slavery, further known as modern slavery, refers to the institutions of slavery that remain to survive in the modern day. Calculations of the abundance of slaves now vary from around 21 million-29 million to 46 million.

As many as 13,000 people in Britain are sufferers of slavery, nearly four times the amount previously believed. The total for 2013 signifies the first time the government has made an accurate assessment of the scale of modern slavery in the United Kingdom and comprises women coerced into prostitution, domestic workers, and operators in fields, factories, and fishing.

The National Crime Agency (NCA)’s human trafficking center had earlier put the figure at 2,744. Launching the government’s policy to abolish modern slavery, the home secretary, Theresa May, announced the range of degradation was shocking.

The first start to abolishing the scourge of modern slavery is recognizing and facing its presence. The predicted scale of the dilemma in modern Britain is shocking and these current numbers starkly strengthen the cause for necessary action.

Nevertheless, there will continually be slaves, because some people believe that we need a leader, and for that, we will never truly be free. The government is not interested in your freedom, they are interested in their profits. We were all born into a cage and the few liberties that are protected are only protected since they are valuable to our masters.

If we are not beneficial to our masters, particularly the government, then we are not a useful livestock. Nevertheless, as we have grown more used to our freedoms over time, we have started to examine why we require leaders at all.

The government like us to believe that we are free, that way they can get more from us, slaves. Freedom is slavery, and slavery is freedom. If the government can get the people to attack each other, when everyone brings up the truth of their circumstances, then they don’t have to waste nearly as much time controlling them directly, since the people who have become reliant on the stolen generosity of the government will forcefully resist any interrogation of the value of human ownership.

Furthermore, the intellectual and cultured stocks forever and always reliant upon the government will respond to anybody who demands freedom from control, you will harm everybody.

In fact, it wouldn’t hurt anyone, it would seemingly make everything much safer since actually, we don’t require anyone to lead.

No one should be put through torment, or any other treatment or suffering that is harmful or makes him or her feel less than human. Nevertheless, the government does it on an everyday basis, and what’s sadder, is that we the people let them get away with it.

We welcome into our homes the stories on the news, we examine the paper and gather every report that’s put in there, but the papers tell lies all the time, and as individuals, we accept them as truth. The fact of the matter is, that the people who have wealth, are all lead by indulgence, and they actually have no sense of the environment encompassing them.

They are all impervious to other people’s needs and more open-minded to making money, and their conduct towards other people in poverty proves that. It’s easy to critique people when it’s not befalling them, however, what they do is wrong, and they can manufacture the truth as much as they like, but when it comes down to it, you can attempt to rip another human being apart, but you can never destroy their soul, not really, but, you can starve them to destruction.

Maybe, that’s their plan, and I must agree that’s a great bit of planning. Adopt a method of execution, by killing off numerous people a year to tune the world, even out the chaff from the wheat, and later invoke a superhuman species, similar to what Hitler did, or at least aspired to.

It’s a good concept in the scheme of things, however, if it didn’t work for Hitler, it’s surely not going to work for this administration. It’s a tough position that people find themselves in, momentarily. People can either settle in this place, or they can burrow themselves out of it. That junction in the road, it goes in two directions, and we can take either one, which one are you going to take?

A number of people are so ­malnourished they require hospital treatment, which has quadrupled in 10 years. In a surprising statement of the nation’s food deficit , more than 16,000 incidents of starvation were recorded in hospitals in England last year, a percentage of 45 every day.

More than 900 of these incidents were classified as critical, suggesting patients were at risk of starving to death. However, these disturbing NHS numbers are simply the ultimate tip of an iceberg of suffering and deprivation as GPs treat thousands of more poverty-stricken patients for malnutrition.

Campaigners condemn circling food costs, declining earnings and cruel benefit cuts and sanctions. It’s a national disgrace. The fifth richest nation on the planet is presently suffering from Victorian conditions such as starvation, rickets, scurvy. These numbers are shocking and need to be a real wake up call.

Severe starvation is extremely dangerous and can be deadly. Furthermore what is truly disturbing is that for each person admitted to a hospital, there will be five times that amount getting care in out-patient clinics, and another 50 times that amount getting care from their GP.

These numbers are just the absolute tip of the iceberg. It’s an additional strain on an already over-burdened NHS and it is completely avoidable and preventable. More and more people in England are living in food hardship.

Mid 2007 and 2014 food costs increased 12 percent in real terms, whilst earnings fell by seven percent. For people in low paid employment and on benefits, it is a genuine fight to put food on the table. Last year more than a million people accessed food banks, it is a sad indication of the disparity in this country.

Numbers that were given, note that last year 16,314 hospital incidents were diagnosed with protein-energy malnutrition, a malady more normally observed in developing countries. Furthermore, in 1,557 of these cases, the ­malnutrition was critical enough for them to be admitted to the hospital, four times the amount from a decade ago.

This latest information on malnutrition, as well as the data that has been revealed on the amounts of ­children who are underweight and anemic, portrays a gloomy panorama of life at the bottom of the pile.

The Government has two responsibilities, to improve and push up family incomes and support neighborhood ­communities divert the large quantities of nutritious, good quality food consumption to the starving.

The United Kingdom’s largest food bank system, the Trussell Trust, gave more than 1.1 million three-day food parcels last year, up from just 25,899 seven years ago. Benefits suspensions were the No 1 cause for people requiring aid from the food banks, accompanied by low income and benefit reforms.

Today’s ­malnutrition figures are disturbing. Every day families are fighting to put enough food on the table and we learn from parents who go hungry so their children have enough to eat. Skipping meals for days at a time is unhealthy and can lead to starvation.

This is why we must attain answers to the ­underlying problems of food shortage. The average age of patients admitted to hospital last year was 64, implying pensioners are hammered hardest by food shortage. However, 284 of the cases managed in the hospital were children under 18.

Patients with severe protein-energy malnutrition (PEM), the effect of low calorie or protein consumption, have normally fallen more than 20 percent of their body mass. It can lead to the enlarged abdomens and lack of skin color more regularly observed in famine sufferers.

When an old person is malnourished they will be quite weak and much more prone to fall and end up on a roundabout of regular hospital readmissions since their malnourishment is not regularly flagged up as a danger in their release records. It is a tremendous dilemma.

Spiraling food costs, triggered by the fall in the rate of the pound, will be harmful to already struggling families. An approximated four million people in Britain frequently go a whole day without eating. One in 10 adults experienced modest levels of hunger in 2014, putting the United Kingdom in the bottom half of European countries beneath Hungary, Estonia, Slovakia and Malta.

The Department for Work and Pensions asserted that work was the most reliable way out of poverty.

Asperger’s victim Mark Wood perished of starvation five months after having his benefits cut. He had wasted away to just five-and-a-half stone. Mark, 44, had a number of disabilities and mental health conditions but was pronounced fit for work by staff at the DWP following an evaluation from government contractor Atos.

His housing benefit and employment and support allowance were all withdrawn and he was unable to survive on the £40-a-week disability allowance that remained. Mark’s BMI when he died was only 11. This is inappropriate with life. He had starved to death. He was a victim of the Government’s benefits cuts.

Mark was terribly independent and was unwilling to ask assistance from his family, who were oblivious of his situation until just before he died in August 2013, and when he lost his benefits he didn’t actually understand.

He had £40 a week to live off and there was no cash left for food once he’d settled other bills, and he couldn’t even meet them.

The Department for Work and Pensions confirmed the choice to axe Mark’s benefits was incorrect and requested a review. However, the increasing hospital problems of starvation was evidence that nothing has improved.

It is beating up the helpless when they are down. People like Mark are viewed as unimportant and that’s going to happen more and more as the government makes more profits.

A doctor has revealed how he has retreated to prescribing nutritional drinks to patients who can’t afford to eat. He stated the high-calorie drinks, typically given to people who require building up post-surgery – were a lifeline.

Over the past two to three years there has been a marked rise in the amount of patients suffering from starvation. Patients who are going to their GP’s are underweight since they really can’t afford to eat. That’s where the nutrition drinks come in.

They’re about 400 calories and they have all the vitamins a person requires. It’s not going to resolve the underlying difficulties of food deficit but it’s one of the few things that can help it.

If we are powerless to end this poverty, at least we can think of something to improve it, and we want to prevent people from dying because of it. We further need to help people. Keep an eye on your next-door-neighbor, particularly if they are elderly or disabled, it takes nothing to be kind to another person.

There are numerous households in the United Kingdom that have an elderly or disabled person living there on their own that might require some help. Take the opportunity to help somebody today!

Somebody I know said he woke up this morning and thought he’d had a dream – Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton competing for the presidency. And he’s plausibly right, Mickey Mouse should have stood for the presidency, if Trump or Clinton can get in, then I’m convinced that Micky could as well, and what’s more, the American people are that gullible, they would feasibly let Micky Mouse in as well. Of course, Mickey is a cartoon figure, but then so are Trump and Clinton.

What are the American people thinking, well, that is the million dollar question? When you reflect that these people, who are inquiring if we have tea with the Queen, and do we have any relations in Scotland since they think Scotland is only up the road, or even implying that some common person can baptize a Jew, then we are on a pretty uncertain road.

I don’t believe either of them comic characters should become president of the United States, and then I am imagining who would be the lesser of the two evils, Trump or Clinton? I suspect Trump would be the lesser of the two evils, so long as they want America to stay intact, on the other hand, Clinton is really trigger happy, and I’m convinced she believes she’s in the Wild West there someplace, perhaps OOOOk-lahoma, where the wind comes sweepin’ down the plain.

Hopefully, Clinton isn’t too menopausal when she’s considering pressing the button of destruction.

Numerous constitutional rights are interrupted during martial law and supposed to be restored once the emergency is under control. Furthermore, whilst the world political elites have been gathering in secret to prevent conservative businessman Donald J. Trump’s presidential crusade, it’s obvious that he probably already obtained the Republican nomination and maybe the Presidency.

The unbelievable reaction a Trump nomination could create amongst the political establishment is so big, many are thinking Obama is willing to proclaim martial law and suspend the election. Oh, I hope he does…

On the facade, this looks highly improbable and unlikely. Nevertheless, by doing a careful study on all that has transpired up until now, all Americans should be cognizant that this sort of scenario is quite likely.

As you presumably know, Obama is really disliked with the military. He is continually renewing the current officers with those who have shown special dedication and eagerness to walk the line, even if it has harmed troop confidence or ability.

In addition, he has proposed that a civil national security force would be of use, which appears aimed not at outside threats but directly towards U.S. civilians.

Obama has organized law enforcement departments in more than 70 federal government bureaus, which indicates there are more than 120,000 law enforcement agencies in the federal government for him to use.

Additionally, departments you wouldn’t anticipate, such as the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have bought hundreds of thousands of hollow point bullets.

Just what are they planning?

The Afghan Sweetheart who graced an iconic cover of National Geographic magazine in 1985 has been detained in Pakistan on charges of being in the country illegally with allegedly fraudulent papers. Sharbat Gula was 12 years old when she was shot by Steve McCurry in a refugee tent in Pakistan, in December 1984.

The unforgettable portrait of the green-eyed girl became a worldwide representation of refugees and of political and social turmoil in the country. It has been extensively replicated, making her one of the extremely recognizable non-celebrity profiles of the 20th century.

Her face was embellished on the front of the magazine, and I for one stared at her picture, which was beautiful, those green eyes haunting, but then I went about my day, and never gave her another thought, I never even knew why she was in the front of the magazine.

In 1985, I was a mother and had one son who was a year old, and I never had the opportunity to even grasp what it was all about. Various people out there were seemingly the same as myself, and presently I find myself feeling really guilty of the fact that I never understood what was occurring in Afghanistan at the time.

On Wednesday, Gula was detained by Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency. Officials invaded her home in Peshawar in northern Pakistan. Some experts state perhaps she will go unpunished, whilst others state she could see 7 to 12 years incarceration.

Gula is being detained and investigated by the police. According to the Afghan ambassador to Pakistan Omar Zakhilwal, she will stand a hearing Tuesday, November 1. However, they anticipate her release. If sentenced, she would face 7 to 14 years in jail and a penalty of $3,000 to $5,000.

The National Geographic Society displayed its help for Mrs. Sharbat Gula and urges the Pakistani police to clear her on humanitarian grounds. She has experienced a life plagued by multiple difficulties and much struggle.

Gula had supposedly been using an unofficial national identity card that she had obtained without proper approval in 2014. Ilyas announced his agency was further reviewing three officials speculated to of improperly distributing the card to Gula. Usually, foreign nationals are not supposed to get these cards.

The three Peshawar-based officials have been discharged and were detained on bribery charges. They are currently released on bond but are expected back in court Friday. She has suffered throughout her whole life, and her arrest is an extreme breach of her human rights.

Millions of people escaped Afghanistan during the country’s conflict with the Soviet Union in the 1980s. Many established themselves in Pakistan, where now there are an approximated 2.5 million Afghans. The refugees have not always been welcome in the country, and have suffered prejudice and hostility from some Pakistani inhabitants and bureaucrats.

In 2014, Pakistan declared intentions to transfer many of its refugees away, noting that more than 60,000 national ID cards had supposedly been obtained fraudulently by foreign fugitives. According to the United Nations, more than 350,000 Afghan exiles have since left Pakistan for their homeland.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has distanced itself from Gula’s situation. In a discussion with a Pakistani newspaper, Dan McNorton, the Senior External Relations Officer for UNHCR Pakistan, stated the organization could not help Gula since she is not listed as a fugitive.

Thousands of Afghans have been detained over the past year under suspicion of having inappropriate paperwork. However, Sharbat has global recognition, and that’s why it’s a prominent story when somebody of her stature is connected to such a situation.

Gula has never asked for any fame, and she is seeking to survive and raise her family under very unfavorable circumstances. Gula has been arrested of having given the equivalent of about $450 U.S. in bribes to officials in order to obtain the ID card.

The cards had become popular in current years since they make it simpler for people to move about and carry out business. It is common, and legal, for the cards to be distributed to Afghans. Gula had been residing in Peshawar since 2002. She had five children, however, a daughter died while giving birth several years ago, about the same time Gula’s husband Rahmat died of an illness.

Her children have been calling, they are similarly fearful of getting arrested. Gula did not want to go back to Afghanistan, her settlement is not safe.

The attempt to relocate Gula in 2002 was hard. Steve McCurry showed her photograph to numerous people in the refugee camp in Pakistan until one man recognized her. She had taken shelter in the mountains of Tora Bora. Three days later, the man brought Gula back to the camp.

She was as beautiful as the young girl Steve McCurry had snapped 17 years before. She had no concept her picture had been viewed by millions, and that it had motivated numerous people to enlist or donate to help refugees.

Please start a global petition to Sharbat Gula so that she is freed…

Apparently, Nat Geo does compensate her and Steve McCurry even helped purchase her a house, he’s also committed on his FB page to funding for her legal fees in this case. He is a really honorable man. Hopefully, they’ll legitimately see her as an important social figure and worldwide treasure, by sponsoring a visa for her to live someplace better if she wants.

FREE SHARBAT GULA!

Everybody moans about politicians, everybody says that they’re useless, well where do they think these government officials originate from? They don’t leave the atmosphere, they don’t move through a cloud of another proximity, they arise from English guardians and English families, English homes, English schools, English houses of worship, English organizations and English Universities and they’re chosen by English citizens.

Is this is the best we can do people, is this is what we have to give, is this what our system offers, rubbish in, rubbish out, if you have narrow-minded uninformed taxpayers, you’re going to get greedy moronic leaders and you’re going to end up with a group of self-centered shallow British people. So perhaps it’s not the politicians that are useless, perhaps it’s something else that is useless, like the people.

There’s a subtle campaign trademark, the public sucks, fuck your dreams. Since, if it’s indeed the fault of all these politicians, then where are all these brilliant people of morals? Where are all these brilliant, respectable, intelligent British people, ready to step in, and protect the country and guide the way?

They don’t have people like that in England, everybody’s at the shopping centre, scratching his arse, picking his nose, taking his credit card out of his pocket, and getting a pair of trainers, therefore voting is insignificant because Britain was bought, sold and paid for a long time ago, the shit they shuffle around every five years doesn’t mean a thing.

And if you do vote, you have no right to protest, and people like to spin that around, they say, if you don’t vote, you have no right to protest, but where’s the reasoning in that? If you vote and you elect corrupt, inept people, they get into government and screw everything up, then you are accountable for what they have done.

You caused the problem, you voted them in, you have no right to complain, those on the other hand who did not vote are in no way responsible for what these people have done, and have every reason to complain about the mess the voters created.