THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Councillor Healy, who is a prolific tweeter of anti-Conservative propaganda, retweeted the mocked up poster. The poster likens the Left’s extreme thoughts of Conservative party policy to the Holocaust. The post has substituted the long green country road going off into the skyline on the actual Conservative poster with the notorious location of the railway leading into the extermination camp of Auschwitz, Birkenau. The poster also has a new strap line of more people on zero hours, more tax cuts for the wealthy, and no more NHS.

It is estimated that 1.1 million people, many of them Jews, were wiped out at Auschwitz as part of the Nazi’s Final Solution.

It’s distasteful, and the Jewish people will be exceedingly disgusted by this poster. They don’t need it transmitted on billboards so they just have to live over what they encountered all those years ago, and this plane of incompetence should not be brushed under the rug.

We are supposed to have moved forward, not going back to the dark ages, but we seemed to be continually doing this, and in the end it’s going to be explosive.

There are already riots going on in France, and people are getting killed, or hurt, and now we are having posters put up with a theme of Nazism on them just waiting to explode, the Jewish community is enraged, and they will end up getting together, so that they can band together to take action.

Separately, we have no chance at all, and we can’t afford to be isolated because France is under attack. Seventeen people died in Paris in loyalty to the Islamic State militant group, and that’s what punishment Jewish people get for just being Jewish.

However, now they have to see this disgusting poster, is there no rest from persecution, or do the Jewish people have to keep visiting their past? It’s obvious that the Jewish people shouldn’t have to, but they keep getting reminded of it, and it’s uncertain when it will all stop.

Councillor Healy has now been debarred by the labor party due to her retweet. Nevertheless, she has since got into more difficulties when it was disclosed she had favored a photograph, calling the Royal Family a Nazi family. She has since erased her Twitter account.

A woman has said that she was repeatedly coerced into having sexual dealings with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around to rich and powerful acquaintances as a sex slave while she was still a minor, nevertheless, Buckingham Palace has said the claims are false.

The accusation was made in a lawsuit by women who alleged they were victimized by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multimillionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with underage girls in 2008.

The woman lodged the case anonymously, and is understood to have been 17 years old at the time, which is viewed as underage under Florida law.

The prince is not a cited party in the legal claim, and has not had any chance to respond to the allegations, and has previously denied any sexual impingement with young women affiliated with Mr Epstein or any knowledge of his behavior.

Buckingham Palace refused to remark on the allegations. Evidently the palace can’t give comments about on-going legal processes.  This refers to the long-standing and on-going civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party to, hence the palace would not comment on the particular subject.

Nevertheless, Prince Andrew’s Tycoon Buddy may have taken compromising photographs of him with the minor he is supposed to have abused.  Details that are entombed in original court papers lodged against deviate Jeffrey Epstein, 61, disclose that he taped the sleazy debaucheries he threw for VIPs at his lavish homes using secret cameras in the ramparts of the guest bedrooms.

One of the purportedly sexual meetings with the Prince, 54, took place at an orgy involving other minors on Epstein’s private land.  The financier, who was imprisoned for 18 months in 2008, after pleading guilty to solicitation for prostitution, kept a sickening hoard of pictures on a computer seized at his Palm Beach mansion in 2006.

Prince Andrew has become a frequent guest at the menage of Epstein.

The adult female in question, cited as Jane Doe 102, referred to the secret cameras in a 27 page filing at the Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida.

On the day that Epstein was taken into custody, police found two concealed cameras and photos of underage girls on a computer in the defendant’s house, and it is alleged that he may have taken obscene photos of Jane Doe 102 with his secret cameras and sent them to his other abodes and elsewhere.

There is no hint that Prince Andrew knew Jane Doe 102 was being held as a sex slave by the magnet, and she claims she first converged with the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

During a stop in London, they called on his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of corrupt media baron Robert Maxwell.  Jane Doe 102 claims in the latest court documents, lodged on December 30, that she first slept with the Prince at Maxwell’s home.

Court papers also alleged that Maxwell also was given naked photographs of her, that she had taken herself to Epstein as a birthday present.  The court papers added that Jane Doe 102 was also coerced into telling Epstein all about her sexual encounters, so he could use the information to blackmail the royal.

She further claims that she was used for sex trafficking for many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, influential business executives, foreign presidents, a well known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.

Prosecutors conceive Epstein, who loved seeing other people have sex, had cameras fitted to his other residences across the world.

Prince Andrew, who was photographed with Jane Doe 102 during a party in New York, was holed up in a lavish ski chalet in Switzerland. Nevertheless, Buckingham Palace has recapitulated his strongly worded denial of the allegations.

Prince Andrew, vacationed with Epstein in Thailand in 2001, and was surrounded by bare-breasted women on a yacht, however, an odd-job man who spent 11 years working for the mogul claims Prince Andrew frequently had massages when he was an invitee at the tycoons Palm Beach mansion.

Juan Alessi claims the prince enjoyed everyday massages from youthful women, and frequently came out beaming after his rubdowns.  Mr Alessi claims the massages were carried out in a private part of the mansion, that only Epstein and other chosen guests could have admittance to.

Mr Alessi also recounted how he witnessed parties at the waterfront mansion, at which the Prince was present while young girls cavorted in the nude, despite his friend’s 2008 conviction for child sex offenses, Prince Andrew carried on seeing him, and the duo were seen together in Central Park, New York.

The resulting craze led to him giving up his office as Britain’s trade envoy.

Epstein did 13 months before he was released.

Jane Doe’s claims against the Prince came after she linked up with three other women in a suit against the prosecutors, claiming they broke the law by neglecting to confer with them before signing a plea bargain for the tycoon, and it is understood that without the agreement he would have faced up to 15 years in jail.

The ongoing suit was lodged by Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, and cites the US government as the defendant.

The lawyers alleged Epstein’s handling was opposite to the Government’s normal approach in prosecuting federal sex offenses, and the US State Attorney’s office in Florida still has the offensive haul of pictures from Epstein’s Palm Beach home, which were caught on devices concealed in walls in the guest bedroom, nevertheless, the subject is still open to on-going judicial proceedings.

Ghislaine Maxwell marked claims against her as false, and her spokesman stated that the allegations against her were false, and that the original allegations are not new, and have been fully answered and proven to be false.

It was also articulated that each time the story was reiterated it altered with additional and lewd details about public figures and world leaders.  The woman’s claims are obvious lies and should be handled as such.  Ghislaine Maxwell’s original reply to the lies continues to be the same, and she strongly denies any allegations of a distasteful nature, and reserves her right to seek redress.

Buckingham Palace has denied any hint of indecency with minors by Prince Andrew, all the same, if Prince Andrew insists on hanging around with scumbags like Epstein, some of the sleaze were bound to rub off.

His friends have stated that the duke’s integrity is of the uttermost importance to him.  It’s a pity his awful judgement has made it so easy to question everything about the man.

The Duke of York has never learned from his days as Randy Andy the pudgy man-about-town, through his marriage to Fergie, and then on to a crony of society, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and now the claims that he had sex with a 17 year old girl who was being exploited by billionaire Jeffrey Epstein as a sex slave, it’s all absolutely disgusting.

Virginia Roberts alleges in court documents she had sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions. One of which was at an orgy of underage girls.

Are the claims of Ms Roberts true, who knows, it doesn’t really matter because the damage has been done, has it ruined his integrity, in all likelihood it has… however, the only fact that remains is that everyone is going to want to know if it’s true or not, particularly in the aftermath of operation Yewtree.

Prince Andrew’s blinding lack of judgement certainly needs to be analyzed, instead of people construing what they believe is right or wrong, until it resembles something like the truth.  He might have the appearance of an arse, but he’s a fine looking man, he could have any woman he wanted, especially with his huge amounts of cash.

However, if you hang around with the wrong people, like super rich sleaze bag Jeffrey Epstein, sooner or later you’ll start to reek of his filth, and become a spectacle of ridicule, vexing the public into believing that it’s true.

Prince Andrew was an easy target for a player like Epstein, and clueless Randy Andy, who only saw dollar signs, fell for it, and even more extraordinarily so, after Epstein’s sentence for perverting with minors, Andrew still stayed friends with him.

However, Andrew has a long chronicle of having his head turned by a pretty face, or a large bank account, with little worry as to what might lie behind them.  He’s had friendships with bad and tainted characters from Kazakhstan, Libya, Uzbekistan, Tunisia and more.

And it’s still an enigma of how Andrew and Fergie’s Buckinghamshire home was sold through a Kazakh businessman for £15 million, seven years ago, which was way over the asking price, and then left to go to rack and ruin.

Sunninghill in Berkshire is not the kind of place where you’d expect to discover housing dereliction.  It is a region with some of the most luxurious properties in Britain, where nearby are Ascot race course and Wentworth golf club.

Many of the homes have security gates and electronic surveillance cameras to glance over visitants.  Tradespeople are instructed to use the rear gate, and behind the brick walls and dense rhododendron hedges, the passing traveler can glance at larger houses with pillared porticoes, monuments more to blatant richness, than architectural taste.

However, high on a rise, set back from the road as you take the B383 north towards Windsor Great Park, one modernistic house rests shuttered and barricaded, like the dismal, decaying house in an updated medieval novel, but it wasn’t always like this.  Sunninghill Park was the home constructed for the Duke and Duchess of York on their marriage 23 years ago.

It has always been known as South York, a name bestowed by the tabloids because of its so-called resemblance to the sort of Texas style ranch popularized by the soap opera Dallas, but now its just withering away, uninhabited since the Duchess and her daughters moved out seven years ago and sold, evidently to a Kazakh billionaire, for a price which was well over the market rate, and it now rests deserted, its present ownership unclear.

When the Prince says his integrity is of utmost importance, perhaps what worries him is that people should perceive him as a man of integrity.

Frankly, I’m not sure how Madonna could have really likened herself to Martin Luther King Jr or the former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela – who the hell does she imagine she is?  She’s clearly assuming that she’s something that she’s not, which really does paint a picture that she’s unquestionably having some sort of issue in her life.

She went on to say that she was just admiring and acknowledging their Rebel Hearts – Nelson Mandela a rebel, not sure about that fact, but he was a freedom fighter, and the greatest man alive, when he was alive, and will for sure carry on being so for centuries to come, but I think she should have said rebellion and not rebel, maybe she should have named her album Rebellions at Heart…

If she wanted to compare herself to a rebel, perhaps she should have said she was a little bit like James Dean or Marlon Brando, which would have been a much better portrayal.

 

Madonna stated that anyone who fights for freedom is a rebel heart, however, she should also realize that there are different types of rebels, and some are not fighting for freedom.  Nelson Mandela opposed a cause, which was to free the people of South Africa, and for that it yielded a very high price, and he is an icon of admiration to all South Africans, and was of far more importance than being put on an album cover.

The Tories much boasted election poster campaign was in shreds after it came out that the characteristic road was in fact a photograph taken in Germany.

George Osborne said that it was a British road pictured on the election poster, which assured the party would keep Britain on the road to a more abundant economic system.

According to George Cameron, it’s a British photograph, and a British road, I guess George needs to go back to SpecSavers…

The photograph itself comes from iStock, run by the picture agency Getty Images, and was taken by German photographer Alexander Burzik six years ago, although it has been digitally adapted since then.  The colors have altered, the sky has been changed, and a gap in the trees has been made, with some additional fields appended to the backdrop.

Alexander Burzik said that the original photograph had been taken close to his home town of Weimar, in central Germany, however, some Tories on Twitter have supported the use of the picture, despite it being from Germany, and not Britain.

However, the gaffe is particularly invigorating UKIP admirers, which now implies that they’re apostles will be following UKIP around like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, which is a bit of a piss take, taking into account, that’s where the Pan Piper was portrayed as coming from Germany.

 

I’m not criticizing, but wouldn’t that be like the pot calling the kettle black?  So, we can color it over as much as we want, but really UKIP is no better than the Tories, and that’s no understatement.  All the same, UKIP is fundamentally new, and should be given a bit of an opportunity in the run up to the 2015 election, aside from the fact that almost all parties are habitual liars, and are famed for telling all sorts of fibs to make themselves look good, and as viewed with this photograph, they will go to any lengths to do just that.

A former Labor MP has been slammed for proposing that people should only get welfare payments if they’re placed on forced contraception, however, Gary John’s suggestion was draconian and ill-informed.

Gary John’s lost his seat in 1996, and distanced himself from the Labor Party since then.  He wrote his views in the Australian on Tuesday, stating taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for people’s decisions in having children.

Mr John’s went on to state that possible parents of inadequate substance, poor skills or of defective fibre should not enter parenthood while on a benefit.

He also went on to say that some families, some communities, some cultures spawn discord, however, he did not say which ones, and he also said “some”, which also means “not all”, which also means that everyone has to suffer.  I’m not stating that what he is saying is true, however, what I am stating is that by taking everybody who is on benefit and productive, and to put them on contraceptives, signifies that the only people procreating would be those on a middle to high living – sounds a bit like they’re attempting to breed “Stepford Children.”

What Mr John’s is proposing is a criterion of proposed draconian methods, and its ill-informed, inadequate policies and grievous because of the stigma it impounds for single parents.  His beliefs are gestated out of ignorance, and leapfrogs over systemic events of welfare in order to incriminate certain individuals.

In fact the said article only amounts to naive affirmations made by somebody who is privileged, but it’s all about welfare bullying, and the government has an obligation to all its people, whether they’re reproductive or not, and if the government is going to dictate on whether we are permitted children or not, we may as well be part of China and become a communist nation.

While we’re tucked up in our lovely bed, please give a thought to other people sleeping rough on the streets.  We scarcely give a thought to those that are out in the freezing cold with no family or friends to assist them.

They’re not tramps that solicit, steal or borrow, they are really homeless, and need assistance, not in a year’s time, or a month’s time, but right now…

They do not have any possessions, primarily because everything that they did once possess is now gone, and it’s majorly important that we help those in need.  We have Children in Need on TV, so why can’t we help those on the streets?  Children need some help, however, so do adults that have become hard times for whatever reason, it shouldn’t be an issue, they’re still human beings.

There is no Homeless Shelter in Basildon. Essex, but we genuinely need one because the church is feeding about 25 rough sleepers around the town, and there are more rising numbers of people sleeping rough.  There was talk of a dispersal order being brought in, however, that’s no good if there’s nowhere for these people to move onto, there needs to be something put into place.

Nobody was doing anything aside from the church to assist these people till a page was set up on Facebook called “Homeless Help in Basildon and Surrounding Areas”.  Now ordinary people are going into town to feed the homeless, and a location has been set up for a Sunday for the homeless to go and get food that many ordinary people have prepared, taking it, and circulating it to the homeless that attend – now that’s what I call team spirit.

Basildon urgently needs a Shelter at night, like in Southend on Sea, where they have the Homeless Action Resource Project, where they can sleep and get assistance applying for a council home or jobs, however, some people don’t accept that there is a homeless problem in Basildon.

We frequently forget that kindness is free, and these volunteers also raised £250 over two weeks to put one well-known homeless man in a hotel for a few nights over the Christmas holiday, and treat him to a meal.  He is often spotted sleeping rough in the doorway of Primark, in Basildon town center.

Everyone should give something to their community, and now some of the community has come together, and the word is getting about what they are doing for the homeless.  It’s outstanding work that has been done for the homeless, but it’s distressing to think that the council has not housed them, or at least put them into temporary accommodation until homes are found for them.

Even Costa Coffee done their bit for the homeless, and gave one well-known homeless man a Costa Coffee travel mug, it made his day, he was so chuffed, however, it still breaks your heart to know that when you go home, in your nice warm house, these people will be out in the freezing cold with nowhere to go to keep warm.

Margaret Thatcher personally shrouded child abuse allegations made against one of senior government ministers. The Tory Prime Minister evidently held a high powered meeting, who was being tipped for promotion, and told him that he had to clean up his sexual behavior.

It followed an allegation that the minister had sexually abused young boys at the home of one of his political allies in 1982. Nevertheless, the minister seemingly dismissed the warnings, and it is claimed that four years later he was spotted by police looking for young boys for sex at Victoria railway station in London, however, no action took place.

The claims made by an informant with inside knowledge of Scotland Yard in the early 80’s are now expected to be put before the Westminster child abuse inquiry that has been announced by the Prime Minister. It claims that there was an establishment cover up to protect politicians. Judges and police officers involved in a macabre pedophile network.

David Cameron has already agreed to a full scale probe into the historical allegations of child abuse, and he has nominated Lady Butler-Sloss to head the investigation, and although the investigation is in its infancy, its determinations could be extremely volatile, especially if it shows that a previous Prime Minister knew about the allegations.

If this proves to be true, then these extraordinary disclosures will unwrap a remarkable state of affairs, so much so that they’re virtually unimaginable. However, that is what people said about Jimmy Savile, and look what happened to him.

The minister’s supposed involvement in abusing adolescent male children first came clear later on when he had been staying at the dwelling of a constituency agent. A high level gathering involving Margaret Thatcher. Prime Minister at the time, and Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw, as well as a senior policeman, and an M15 officer was carried out to talk about the said behavior.

Nevertheless, rather the minister being disciplined or dismissed, the minister was given cautionary words of advice about his future behavior, and the subject was brushed under the rug, only four years after new allegations rose up.

The politician was said to have been found looking for rent boys in the men’s lavatories at Victoria railway station in London in 1986. The toilets were the target of a clandestine sting by Scotland Yard investigators. The officers approached the minister and admonished him about his behavior, it is thought that a report was lodged by a CID officer, but clearly nothing was done about the minister’s behavior, and yet again it was brushed under the carpet.

Piccadilly Circus is one of London’s most infamous rent boy hangouts, which is cited as the chicken rack. A former rent boy taken in by the Westminster sex ring outrage disclosed he was blackmailed into being abused by top Tories.

Now a respectable father of four, he stated how as a young man he was plied with liquor and was afterward coerced to have sex by a Tory minister, and he went to a squalid house party where two Tories celebrated their first year as MPs by having sex with boys as young as twelve years old.

He as well rubbed shoulders at parties in the 1970s with top conservatives, including Sir Keith Joseph, Sir Rhodes Boyson, and Sir Michael Havers.

 

The young boy came to London in 1975, as a dewy-eyed 20 year old who was taking flight from the difficulties of his home country in which one of his best friends had been shot dead. He meandered the streets penniless, and finally ended up in Piccadilly Circus, which was then the notorious arena addressed as the Chicken Rack, where young rent boys touted for clientele.

He said that he was asked if he was looking for anything, and then the three of them proceeded to an eating place where they boozed on wine, and he was tendered a loan, but he stated they were so kind to him, he just got carried away in the here and now.

He claims he was raped twice, and he was then told they would be in touch, and they said that they knew some extremely significant people who would be keen to encounter new boys, but he felt humiliated because he just believed that they were being kind.

Feeling entrapped, he promptly found himself being pimped out by people who had high profile politicians among their customers. The next day he said he was instructed to keep company with an MP to a country dwelling in Essex where they had sex, however, he pleaded with the man pimping him out to stop.

He was threatened, and told that he had no estimation of the people and the mightiness that they exert, and he was ensnared by two menacing pimps who threatened to mail graphic photographs of him to his parents if he attempted to flee their clutches.

He was even warned that his family back home in Northern Ireland would have an accident if he refused to have sex with their powerful clients.

This man that has been interviewed sobbed uncontrollably. His wife knew nothing of what had happened to him, however, he admitted to her that he was part of this, and that he was raped. He had shut away the subject deeply in a vault inside his head, but now seeing the article, blew it all up again for him, all the dread, hurt and torment came flooding back to him.

He spoke in a hotel close to his home in a small town in Northern Ireland, and he is looking at giving a statement to the government inquiry into the scandal.

He said that he felt that he was at risk, however, these people had been so good to him.  He said that once he was back at the flat that they had taken him to, he felt lightheaded, and got up to leave, however, he was forced into a bedroom, and he felt helpless.  He was then stripped down, and pushed onto the bed.  He did not consent to this at any time, and he felt like he was in an out of body experience, and that perhaps he had been drugged.

He claims he was raped twice, and he felt absolutely exploited.  He was given £30, and told to lighten up, and to stop being so bloody provincial.  The man informed him that he would be in touch.

Photographs were taken of him in bed, and it was stated that they could fall into the wrong hands, including papers and his family, and was told that he couldn’t just think he could run away from this.

Feeling ensnared, he promptly found himself being pimped out by the two men, Kevin or Alan, who had high profile politicians among their customers. Days after he claims Charles Irving, the then Tory MP for Cheltenham arrived.  He approached the politician, inquiring if he was looking for anything, and Irving responded by saying he was looking for him.

He pleaded with the man pimping him out to stop, but only to get more menacing threats. Alan informed him that he had no idea about the people he knew in power, and how dangerous they could be. He said that if they could murder 13 people on the streets of Northern Ireland and get away with it, there would be little difficulty in the setting up for an accident to happen to a member of the lad’s family, this young boy was unquestionably out of his depth.

Before long, he was being taken to parties with a chain of senior Conservatives. It was a house close to Whitehall, where he was guided into a room where numerous men and a few younger boys aged about 15 were boozing.  He was acquainted with an Irish boy, and was then offered a drink from a bowl of punch, and he drank it down. Glass after glass, like it was lemonade.

He was made to sit between two men, who it was stated were both MPs, and they started to rub their hands on his legs and thighs, and he was forced to perform assorted sex acts on some of the men. The scenery was perpetually the same, with a hum of exalted spirits.

The Conservatives felt they were unstoppable…

One night he was taken near the House of Lords and picked up by a peer, they were driven round London while he performed a sex act on him, the peer then gave him a fountain pen.

One of the most seedy parties was thrown one Saturday night at a country house. There were younger boys, and they were all situated in the center of a room, boxed in by a big leather sofa. They were ordered to strip off their clothes and have sex together. He noted a boy of almost 12 or 13 being taken into another room, but he assumed that he’d just been delivered. The boy faced him, and he saw fear in his eyes, it was a look that would forever haunt him.

The abuse before long had an effect on his well being. He was drinking far too much, and had breathing problems. When he was at rock bottom, he went to the home of one of his pimps to face up to him. The pimp opened the door, and he collapsed into the hallway.

The pimp didn’t call an ambulance, he didn’t want a scene, so he put him in a spare room, and he cried himself to sleep. The next day the pimp gave him £50 and told him to go home because he thought he was going to die. He flew back home where he was diagnosed with acute bronchitis, but he didn’t say a word to anybody, and it took a year to deal with it, however, the scars will never mend.

The man in question has turned his life around, he married in 1981, and works as an office manager, but he wants people to know what happened. He wants to see people held accountable, and he wants the truth to come out, and for people to know what goes on in administrative circuits.

Our government seems to have legal power over everything that we do, and they are extremely organized when doing it. They think that they can control everything, it’s their strong point, as they congregate unitedly and scatter mayhem wherever they go, however, the devastation reeks with an unpleasant aroma which suggests that something is not right in the governments abode, which is now bringing wrath to the public.

No teenager should be put through what these deviates are doing to them, it’s harmful and detrimental, and these people are exploiting their influence upon young teenagers, which is clearly inappropriate behavior, and not desirable for teenagers to experience or receive.

If it were anyone else, the issues would have been promptly been exposed, and they would have been caught and charged, and quickly been condemned to prison, however, because it’s inside government, it’s swept under the rug for many, many years, and never talked about, nevertheless, they’re getting away with it, and that’s not acceptable at all.

Confidential medical data from sick and disabled people claiming welfare benefits is opened and screened by Royal Mail staff on behalf of the Government without the claimant’s knowledge or consent.

Breaches of confidentiality have emerged that the Department of Work and Pensions routinely uses the Royal Mail to process thousands of benefit claims, including health information it receives daily.

The disclosures have cued bracing fears about the fact that the handling of sensitive personal data is being lawfully outsourced without the claimant’s consent.

People claiming sickness benefits such as employment and support allowance must start by completing an elaborate medical questionnaire explaining their conditions, prescribed medications and therapies, and the names and addresses of their doctors and nurses.

It asks some extremely sensitive questions about addictions and mental illness, and is then mailed in a pre-addressed envelope to the DWP or Atos health care.

Yet, it has emerged that these envelopes are routinely opened, and the contents screened by Royal Mail, unless the envelope is specifically checked off as private and confidential. In those cases, the envelopes are posted straight onto Atos unopened, according to the DWP.

It all became clear when a local post office was told not to bother posting ESA forms by special delivery as the envelopes would be opened by Royal Mail irrespectively. Nowhere in any claimants paperwork does it state that a third party is involved, and Royal Mail is posting extremely personal data, and people have a right to know this is happening simply because they’re being misled.

Claimants often have incredibly complex case histories. They may have mental health problems or be victims of sexual abuse, which they find incredibly unsettling to now know that such deeply personal information is being shared with Royal Mail.

While there are no grounds to question the sheer integrity of the Royal Mail, they simply should not have entree to this sort of information, particularly in the run up to the Christmas holidays when Royal Mail frequently takes on students that are now rummaging through our post, and that’s where the claimants information leaks out, and there is nothing stopping them from opening our post, and passing that data onto other people.

The DWP has said that security measures had been put in place to minimize the danger of any data breaches, including CCTV in sorting rooms and procedures that mean that at least two people open the post together, however, that doesn’t mean that the people working there will not pass any information by word of mouth, or to even to make fun of those claimants that have extremely sensitive issues.

The keynote here is that claimants should have their information kept private, and that staff that are dealing with such sensitive information should be made to sign a confidentiality clause because of the impact it could have on claimants if their information was to be passed on to somebody that it shouldn’t be.

And there should be fears that the government department could even contemplate allowing such sensitive and confidential medical information to be handled by a third party without the claimants agreeing to it, and there appears to be too many agencies dealing with claimants personal data which needs to be protected.

A person’s information should be safely guarded to subdue any breaches of security, and it doesn’t matter how reputable an agency is, there is still that probability that there could be breaches of security.  Although, that is not proposing that Royal Mail staff are bribable or unreliable, however, it would still be unintelligent to think that nothing or nobody is infallible.

It’s not like there haven’t been breaches in security before, and to a degree that is somewhat disturbing, although one cannot say it would materialize, however, on the other hand, we can’t go around with the pretense that it wouldn’t, and Royal Mail going through our mail can only be a hindrance where claimants are concerned.

Hallucinogenic fungi have been found springing up in no other than the Queen’s garden at Buckingham Palace, after being identified by gardening expert Alan Titchmarsh.

TV presenter excavated the fungi at Buckingham Palace for an ITV gardening show. Alan Titchmarsh recognised the red and white toadstool as he was on his tour of the secluded 40 acre plot. If consumed, it’s known for it’s extremely hallucinogenic effects, however, it also makes people who eat it extremely ill.

The old fashioned thing was to feed the mushrooms to the village idiot, and then to drink his urine because then you would get all the high without any of the sickness.

For the avoidance of uncertainty, fungi from the garden are not used in the palace kitchens, however, it would be so easy not to resist the odd poke here and there just for fun. Comics are going to whizz into this article and centre their rhetoric upon the public, and there will be no censorship of what they articulate.

Alan Titchmarsh has exhausted twelve months researching how the Palace garden alters with the seasons, and we will be experiencing the finishing calendar year with a Christmas tree mounted in the Marble Hall, adorned with holly and mistletoe from the royal garden, which will be festooned with festive golden crowns of magic mushrooms… just joking of course about the mushrooms!

More than 60% of untoward Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) sanctions decisions were made during the first three months of 2014 against people with mental health issues or behavioural problems.

There were 508 adverse sanctions against ESA claimants with diseases of the circulatory or respiratory system, 1,598 against those with diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. There were 571 against people with diseases of the nervous system, 714 against people with injuries, poisoning and certain other issues of external causes, and there were 2,727 against those with other health conditions or disabilities.

According to the DWP, benefit sanctions are used to boost people to engage with the support being provided by Jobcentre’s, by making it clearer to claimants what they are required to do in return for their benefits. Nevertheless, charities and medical experts state that people with mental health issues, learning problems and behavioral problems frequently fight to see what is demanded of them in return for their benefits because they cannot conform to the rigorous demands because they can prove to be more difficult for these groups of people, who are not given any extra support and direction.

It’s very worrying that an increasing amount of people on ESA are having their benefits terminated, despite the fact that there are fewer people on WRAG (Work Related Activity Group). About half the people in the WRAG require support because they have mental health problems, however, over 60 percent of sanctions are placed on this group.

It’s unwarranted that people with mental health problems are being disproportionately affected by the progressively punitory system, and people are manipulated and forced to undertake activities that are inappropriate for them, particularly when they’re not having their mental health taken into account.

As a result of this, people become panicky and sickly, and this makes a reappearance to work exceedingly improbable. We actually need to see people with mental health problems placed in a scheme that recognizes and helps them overpower the challenges that they are fronting everyday.

Not every person who is mentally challenged can manage to get back into work, however, for those that can, they should be assisted at whatever the cost, and those that can’t work any longer should also be helped. This is why our country is called the United Kingdom, a nation that is linked together politically, for the common purpose, or by common beliefs, like a team that is formed by amalgamation.

When David Cameron said that we were all in this together, was he implying the same thing, and did he want a team that was formed by amalgamation. If so, then why is he not putting his money into the welfares financial kitty?  What he was really suggesting when he stated we were all in this together, so long as it’s taxpayers money, and they are putting it into the government’s honey tree…