Benefit Fraud – 10 Years In Jail

People who’ve carried out Benefit fraud in England and Wales could face lengthy jail terms of up to 10 years, following recently developed advice from the director of public prosecutions.

Its time for a strict attitude, considering the £1.9 billion annual cost of the lawbreaking to the country and, prosecutors are to think about charging under the Fraud Act, rather than Social Security Laws because of the scope of longer sentences.

The Prime minister’s spokesperson said he welcomed the move.

Image

Adaptations signify welfare cheaters would be graded alongside offences such as money laundering and banking embezzlement.

In the past, benefit cheats were often charged under social security law, carrying a maximum prison term of seven years and, benefit cheats of less than £20,000 were automatically tried in magistrates court, which could only pass judgement for up to 12 months in prison for numerous illegal acts, but for a single violation, the maximum was six months.

Image

This monetary doorway has been thrown out under the recently developed recommendations, so smaller judicial proceedings can be passed straight to crown courts for stricter sentencing.

Suspected persons can as well be charged under the Fraud Act, which carries the higher prison term of 10 years; as claimed by the Crown Prosecution Service.

We comprehend that Benefit Fraud is extremely serious, but there’s not enough space in prisons as it is.  They’re overflowing and, while it’s agreed-upon that cheating the system should be illegal, where are all the prisons going to obtain the capacity for all these people that are carrying out the offences that the government state they are, or is it that ,in fact, there are not as many people doing the crime and, that the governments data is wrong, whether it be by error or intentionally.

Not only that, it would end up costing the government extra money to house a defrauding criminal, than it would to make them pay back the money they took in the first place, bearing in mind, they would have to feed them, clothes them and, make sure they stayed in good health.  So, not only do we not have room in prisons, but the government don’t have the money to house them either.

A Feel Good Purchase

Consumers are ready to pay a premium for pesticide-free commodities, but the realities can mean you get little more than a psychological boost for your money.

Supermarkets in North America and Europe are spilling over with organically labelled fruit, vegetables, eggs and meats.  More than 80 countries have pesticide-free guidelines and products and, carry one or more of the 200 emblems, trademarks and official documents that they claim that their commodities are organic.

Image

But is the consumer in fact purchasing pesticide-free, the answers are murkier than you might believe?  Ecolabels symbolise an ecological, moral, ingredient or sustainability assertion.

Image

The US, Canada, the European Union and Japan have inclusive organic guidelines supervised by governments and, a number of countries have a 100% pesticide-free labels.

In the US, Department of Agriculture label has many levels, headed by the 100% classification USDA Organic seal.  The US government as well permits the word organic on produce that include 95% pesticide-free ingredients.

Image

Nevertheless, they could include monosodium glutamate, a flavour enhancing natural ingredient, or carrageenan, a seaweed content that thickens food.

Image

Both ingredients are either considerably shunned, or consumers progressively favour local food above organic because they think that it poses physical risks, even though government experts have cleared them as absolutely safe, but how many times has someone proclaimed that something was safe and, then years afterward we discover that they were toxic all along.

A third category classifies produce with a minimum of 70% pesticide-free ingredients.  They can be categorised, revealing to the consumer that they’re made with organic ingredients, but such a label carries no promise about what else may be in the product.

For instance, consumers who purchase a bag of popcorn labelled ‘made with organic corn’ may be startled to discover that their treat could have been processed using genetically altered canola or soybean oil.

Lastly, produce made with less than 70% of pesticide-free ingredients can’t be called organic, but can catalog single ingredients on the wrapping, containers or boxes.

So, how trustworthy are organic labels?  For one, traditional and genetically adapted seeds are known to sometimes get mixed in with organic supplies.

Some organic labels are more meticulous than others.  To earn the EU’s new pesticide-free label, farmers and processing plants must obey a stringent set of guidelines, including the stipulation that 95% of the product’s farmed ingredients have been organically created and validated as such.

As of 2012, by agreement and, in spite of their precise interpretations being different, the EU and the US acknowledge each other’s main organic seal of approval for the intention of promoting commerce.

That means meats, grains, cereals and wines and other produce being given pesticide-free documentation in one region can be offered for sale as organic in the other.

Of course, with the favourable outcome of promoting trade comes temptation and, organic manufacturing is not different from any other.

For the most part, deception has been irregular and, over time, there have no doubt been occasions of nervous farmers facing an insect infestation spraying an unapproved herbicide; or a hard pressed supplier mixing in conventional low cost eggs with more expensive pesticide-free ones.

But fraud has more precisely manoeuvred below the radar and, as trading has flourished and, the stakes have loomed and, calibration of deceit has expended.

This kind of manufacturing puts pressure on global agriculturalists to cultivate more to make up the difference and, in the developing world, that can mean burning forest into farmland, a method that discharges a huge amount of carbon dioxide into the air and, damages the water cycle and species that live in forests.

In other words, even though organic agriculture may necessitate the use of not so many manufactured pesticides, its wider impact can be environmentally difficult.

We’ve heard it all before!

Nick Clegg claimed that would he push to make sure no one on the lowest level of wages pays income tax if the Lib Dems are in government after the next election.

Image

The thing that irritates me; is this, before an election all parties are doing battle and fighting their little hearts out; so that they can get control once more and, that’s what it’s all about.

Occasionally, you might get just one party who are up front about their idea’s and, will share them with the people and, they do what they said they would do, instead of doing it because they want to get the larger part of the votes to get voted in by influencing the people because they just don’t have enough weight to do it all by themselves.

Furthermore, they all appear to have this little ditty that they convince you to go along with.  This party will do this and, that party will do that.  This party is more superior than that party because this party are going to do something more advantageous than the other to make this nation a more fitting place to live.

We’ve heard it all before and, it almost always comes down to the reality that it’s a great big fat lie and, not one of them even comes near to doing or fulfilling what they said in the first place.

So, who do we vote for and, how will it impact on our lives next time, or are they all full of stagnant farts – I’m going to require a muffler for this one!

Image

They all proclaim they’re committed as a party, but commitment is not what’s required here, it’s determination to do the correct thing, but if you’re going to be successful at this thing, one has to stop being so different and; if one can’t do that, then they must adapt.

Not just on the outside, you have to change on the inside and, we have to take risks, make mistakes.  Occasionally it’s necessary not to be flawless, it’s necessary to do the wrong thing, but why, to learn from your mistakes.

We need to find out what’s real and, what’s not, to find out what you feel because human beings are dreadful messes.  This is what’s known as an illogical world filled with human beings.

It’s not about being logical; it’s about following your heart and, that’s what we should all do because human beings have a heart and, in order to follow your heart, sometimes we must do the wrong thing.

Well, the Coalition Party have been doing the wrong thing since 11th May 2010, so they’ve had more than enough time to get it wrong and, to sort it all out and, get it right.

Image

But how does one get freedom and, why would we want to be free when we have such a magnificent country to live in and, we have so much freedom here; until one is ordered to do something and, it may have been an extremely long time since anyone has in fact ordered us to do something, but we can be ordered to do something at any given time.

People ask people to do things all the time and, some would say it’s a request, not an order, but that’s not enough.  If you study our history, dreadful wars have been fought where millions have died for one idea – freedom.   And it appears that something that means so much to so many people is worth having.

We all have a right to be free, things become different, things always change and things move on, as it should be and, there are some of us that attempt to see the meaning of the things around us and, there must be a reason why we are as we are, but the thing is that we are no longer free.

The world is old and, it’s decomposing and, in the end it will come to an end, but while we live on this sphere, do we not want to be recognised for who we are, no more, no less.  Not for praise, not for acceptance, but the straightforward veracity of that acknowledgement.

This is the primary drive to our way of life and, it must be attained because if it isn’t, we can’t die with self-respect.

Image

We’re all remarkable human beings and, the government has a duty to help us become whatever we’re able to be and, what is right for a lot of people in a lot of situations isn’t suitable for everybody in every situation and, it would be conceited of them to presume that it is.

Devastating Town Hall Report Discloses Additional Danger To Disabled People Who Campaigned To Rescue Benefit Payments

Image

An incriminating evaluation of government welfare procedures with regard to disabled people was presented to the Town Hall’s ruling Labour executive on Thursday.

It notified thousands of Islington residents who have wrongly had benefit taken off them by the controversial independent assessor ATOS, only to have it reinstated on appeal, will have to go through the procedure once more because of a further set of modifications.

Image

Disability living allowance (DLA) is to be substituted for working age people by personal independence payments (PIP), meaning that all those on DLA will have to go through a further evaluation by ATOS.

Image

The agency has been condemned for forming an opinion that people are fit to work, even though they have very bad disabilities.

Half of those previously refused disability benefits were wrongly evaluated to be able to work and, had their benefits reinstated on appeal.  An amazing 85 per cent of appeals are victorious when people are counselled correctly and, by the right organisations.

People conveyed that ATOS tests were mechanised and aimed at taking people off benefits.

Image

There are almost 8,000 Islington locals aged between 16 and 64 who will have their DLA end and, will be required to claim PIP.

Image

PIP will require a medical evaluation by an ATOS medical person, but Disability Action in Islington raised it worries about the ability of many people to manage with the entitlement procedures for PIP.

Image

Previous evaluation ATOS assessors did not look at the claimant that they were talking to, but at their computer screens and, in addition, the ATOS assessors did not appear to take into consideration the medical proof of the claimant’s General Practitioner, or of hospital specialists and, there was a sense that the ATOS assessors were simply going through a power driven process intended to take people off benefits.

In one instance,  a claimant had 1,000 official documents substantiating their disability, but was still judged healthy enough to work.  The person won their appeal but only just prior to their being due for their next evaluation.

The governments strategies are farcical and, they need to calm them down and, make them more practical.

It’s foolish to be taking people’s money and, in addition levy them more than they have coming in, knowing full well that they will not be capable of paying their rents, heating their homes and feeding their children, which means only one thing; that the governments sharp-witted idea’s have merely been put into position for one reason and, that is, to impose these disgraceful laws onto the low income and, to make them poverty stricken so that they can restrain them, making them into dog dirt.

In numbers:

12,670 – Number of those claiming a disability benefit
2,100 – Number of council tenants affected by bedroom tax
£45.71 – Average loss of weekly income due to rent cap
8,000 – Islington residents claiming DLA who will have PIP instead
15 – Children who had to leave a school because of rent caps

The powers that be are in charge of people with not so much as a trace of consideration for them.  They have grown into a powerful reign, so much so, that it makes the Royal family look unimportant and, David Cameron and his Scrooge-like party have the capability of bringing everyone down because the ruling classes have become substantially too big for their boots and, presently need bringing down a peg or two before the situation this country is in becomes far worse and, England’s possibilities become a centrepiece in a history book.

MPs’ overheads increase to record amounts with more than one in four putting their family on the payroll

Image

The inflation busting 10% increase totalled £9 million to the bill and, at the moment represents about a third of the whole cost of operating Parliament

The commons have a gravy train that’s going full steam ahead today as Commons inspectors divulged that Members of Parliament squandered a record £98.1 million of taxpayers money on employee costs and additional overheads last year.

Statistics were made available by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, which displays the huge majority of the most recent increase was down to large growth in workforce finances.

There were repeated calls for restraints on MPs putting relatives on the public payroll, at an entire cost of about £4 million.

About one in four Members of Parliament, encompassing four affluent Cabinet Ministers and fellow Tories who campaigned against the minimum wage, use constituents of their personal family at the taxpayers’ levy.

This policy was meant to have been prohibited as part of the improvements targeted at cleaning up Westminster in the wake of the expenses scandal but was retained following a backlist from politicians.

Instead it seems like they’re just trying to uplift their earnings to claim for second homes, travel, food and drink, office and alternative costs from the 650 Members of Parliament, of all the parties, added up to around £400,000 to £23.8 million.

So called payroll expenses, which cope with employees wages, taxes and pensions shot up from £8.7 million to £74.3 million.  That was because staffing allowances were discreetly increased from £115,000 a year to £137,200 for MPs outside London and, from £115,000 to £144,000 for those in the city.

Image

Members of Parliament as well dealt out £13,163 in bonuses and acknowledgement payments to 49 employees last year.  That was up from the £8,104 paid out to 57 workers in the foregoing 12 months.

The MP who lay claim the most was Ian Paisley Junior, the Democratic Unionist who stands for North Antrim.  His personal and office claims added up to £232,042.33, including £45,039.08 on travel and food.

Image

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling and Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin both use their lady wives and, they’re rewarded between £35,000 and £39,999 and, the inventory goes on.

Image Image

A further Cabinet minister, Lib Dem Scotland Secretary Michael Moore, also employs his spouse and, he paid her £15,000 to £19,999 the previous year.

Image

Jennie Bone, famed by frequent statements in her husband Peter’s Commons talks, makes a stealing of between £45,000 and £49,999 following a pay increase as his office manager.

Image

The Mirror disclosed earlier this year that I’m A Celeb star Nadine Dorries had flipped her employee allowance between daughters.

Image

A sum of 10 MPs’ family members get more than £40,000 a year, well over the UKs national mediocre wages of £26,500.

Sir Alistair Graham, ex chairman of the Committee on Standards, said Members of Parliament should have said ‘yes’ to restrictions on employing family when the watchdog called for an embargo and, if they still wanted to keep it in the family then IPSA should take over the hiring and firing.

Lib Dem Deputy PM Nick Clegg was the most costly at £152,553.82 with £12,688.01 in personal overheads, incorporating £9,767.41 for accommodation and bills and £2,920.60 for travel and subsistence.  His claims also comprised £145.50 for a TV licence and 5 first class train journeys.

Image

The statistics were made available as Parliament broke up for the party conference season, precisely two weeks following that MPs came back from their lengthy summer break and, of course Members of Parliament have a significant job to do, representing their voters in Parliament, but like any operational place of work, they are required to keep these costs under control.

Furthermore, at a time when everybody is feeling such a financial squeeze, it’s inappropriate that MPs have given themselves a pay increase.  If their voters haven’t been given a green light to do it, then how come the people that represent them are allowed to?

In the understanding of the former misuses of public sector funds, it’s crucial that these sorts of details are made known; so that the taxpayer can adjudicate for themselves whether their representatives are delivering value for money.

NHS trust instructed to warn landlords following a man taking his own life

Image

Coroner advises social landlords are notified about vulnerable patients

Image

A coroner has urged that a London Hospital trust passes on details about vulnerable patients to social landlords after a mentally ill social tenant committed suicide because he was being turned out of his home.

The gentleman, 44, was found dead in his home in April 2012 following the ouster from his home owned by Genesis Housing Association in North London after failing to pay his rent to the Housing Association.

The Coroner expressed that the man went back to the property and took his own life as a direct result of his being expelled from his home and, the consequence that the expulsion had on his mental health.

The gentleman was being given medical care by Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust for mental health matters that Genesis Housing Association were not aware of.

The coroner said he had sent out a ‘rule 43’ letter, which coroners can send out if they recognise a course of action that could stop similar future casualties, to the hospital trust’s chief executive.

The letter that was sent out in July of this year; proposes the introduction of an evaluation process to notify other agencies, comprising housing suppliers, that a patient is vulnerable.

The letter specified that consideration must be given in a questionnaire that may be filled in by the staff managing the evaluation and, that determines that a person is to be deemed vulnerable and, that it can be handed onto other agencies, such as those supplying housing.

Genesis Housing Association was informed that it didn’t play a part in the man taking his own life and, that the gentleman’s demise was a sad state of affairs.

Nevertheless, since then Genesis have put in place an assortment of measures, such as instructing employees on welfare reform and benefits advice, manifesting a team to assist people avoid declining into rent arrears, or where people are owing money, to help them prior to the situation becoming uncontrollable.

Nonetheless, it’s heart-rending that it takes someone’s demise so that we can then take a course of action and, put things into place to keep the vulnerable safe.  A great deal of vulnerable people will not even read their mail because they can’t deal with the pressure that paying their rent brings about if they’re not on Housing Benefit.

Suicides like this have been going on since the Coalition government came into power and, it’s a disgrace on them.  A lot of people have been self harming and, having nervous breakdowns because of this horrifying bedroom tax.

Image

Had there been a system in place prior to this man killing himself we wouldn’t be talking about his death and, even though housing providers are at the moment teaching employees to be additionally suicide vigilant, it’s as well, putting a substantial pull on housing support staff, bearing in mind that the government has now made a vast quantity of them redundant; so that the ones that are left have a doubled workload for the same amount of money or less.

David Cameron ‘Left His Brain on the Train’

Image

David Cameron left his official ministerial box on a train table while he was taking a trip to a marriage ceremony; as stated by reports.

Image

However, Downing Street renounced that there was any security violation following a passenger taking a photograph of the well tattered red box, with the key in it, whilst the Prime Minister, who on one,  occasion left his eight year old daughter Nancy at a pub, was in an additional section of the train.

Image

It seems the red box was just sitting there and, anyone could have dashed off with it,  had wanted to, but Downing Street maintained the box was not left unguarded; as the premier’s safety measures were there at all times.

The photograph was captured on Saturday as Mr Cameron, refreshed from the fraught G20 summit in Russia, took the train from King’s Cross, London, to York to be present at his sister in law’s marriage ceremony.

The Wandering Jew

Image

For those that are too young to comprehend the full terror of the Holocaust and, the annihilation of the Jews, to rid the world of ‘dirty rotten Jews’, to demolish everything that is dirty.

The Germans destroyed our towns, attempting to erase everything in site.  They bombed our cities, they put Jews into concentration campsites; they starved them of food for a period of 6 years.

But then in 1954 things were a lot different to 1942.  In 1942, there was still a war going on, the largest disaster, the genocide of roughly six million Jews throughout World War II, a programme of structured killings by Nazi Germany, led by Adolf Hitler and, the Nazi Party.

Image

However, prior to starting our journey we have to go back a bit further.  In 1835 after the breakdown of Poland and, part involvement by Russia, Pale of Settlements were established where Jews were confined.

Image

It appears that whatever Jews go, there are always boundaries to control what they can and cannot do.  Jews were blocked from professions, trades etc and, living conditions became extremely difficult.

In 1881, Tsar Alexander II was killed.  This was shadowed by savage massacres against the Jewish people and, thousands were killed and, in the space separating 1881-1882 solely 225,000 Jewish families escaped Russia.

Image

Immigration to America became a way of escaping these truthfully disgusting constraints and provided something better for their families.  Nevertheless, the Russian government did not want the Jews leaving and refused their requests to leave and, this caused the Jews to depart the country by sneaking across the borders.

Some Jews went on foot, others by train, taking with them any belongings they could.  A lot of Jews smuggled themselves into Germany, Austria-Hungary and, Poland and, from there, they would make their way toward the coastal regions and seaports.

No wonder, they call us the ‘Wandering Jews’.

We are all immigrants, ourselves or our parents or grandparents or even great-grandparents but life was not that magnificent living in Whitechapel in 1888 because Whitechapel was known to be of poor quality and trashy.

Image

The streets of Whitechapel were menacing and dangerous, with murders, abuse, drinking, robbery and, brawling that went on between gangs, which was extremely typical and, nothing out of the ordinary.

Nevertheless, life was better there than where the Jews came from because at least they had avoided Military Conscription and, some Jews, in order to evade mandatory enlistment into the Russian Army would cause themselves self mutilation and, there it were even accounts that there was intentional mutilation of children by their parents.

Jews even altered their family name to dodge conscription into the Russian Army, where in 1827, personal military duty for Jews was first found in Russia, with conscription being from 12 to 25 years of age.

The fact that ten Jewish males were chosen each year for every 1,000 Jews in the community, whilst only 7 non Jewish males were nominated every two years for each 1,000 non Jews in the community exhibits that compulsory enlistment had a significant prejudicial intention.

Jews were explicitly selected for specific and disparaging treatment and, a family of a Jew who avoided military service was evaluated and given a fine of 300 rubles, catching a Jew who dodged military service had to relinquish a cash bounty of 50 rubles.

The whole theme of the conscription of Jews into the Russian Army cannot be separated from the seemingly overwhelming eagerness of the Russian institution to transform all Jews to Christianity and, many actions were initiated to fulfil that aim.

Any male between the ages of 12 and 25 could be conscripted for a standard period of 25 years, with particular and harsh constraints that were conceived for the Jews, so as to increase the number of Jewish soldiers, including the induction of a much greater percentage of the Jewish inhabitants than the non Jewish inhabitants.

Additionally, Jews were required to supply drafts for each conscription term whilst non Jews were not liable at differing and unforeseeable intervals.  Jews were called up for money owing in the remittance of taxes and, in the end, conscripts were considered as a fine for being in arrears in the settlement of taxes but without the indebtedness being dismissed.

Since many able bodied men fled from Russia, they were powerless to provide the number of conscripts needed and, it became obligatory to enlist the disabled, sick persons, old men and others who had formerly been held excluded.

This included only sons, oldest sons, sole supporters of families, children as young as 8 years of age and, others who were believed to be excused by virtue of their family or personal circumstances.

Yet in spite of these harsh actions, the conscription arrears grew bigger and each community had  special officers, who seized the children, incarcerated them in the communal buildings and, eventually, handed them over to the military authorities.

These children were very often then taken away to unreachable places like Kazan, Orenburg, Perm and Siberia from where they could not run away and go back home and, where they where held until attaining the age of 12 at which time they were then formally introduced into the army.

So, when families came from Russia to Whitechapel, life was much more advantageous than what they had to tolerate in Russia, even if Whitechapel was recognised as worthless and cheap, it was far superior to what they had been familiar with.

Countless Jews alighting in England had really planned on going to America, but around 120,000 remained in this country because they were drawn by the area’s reputation as a location for economical living and, by the fact that it had been the residence to Jewish inhabitants in preceding centuries and, great numbers made one’s home in Spitalfields, frequently locating work in the clothing trade and, where they would haggle on the markets to earn a living.

As the Jews permeated Whitechapel, the greater their hearts fell, for this was where epidemic destitution drove a great deal of women to prostitution, along with poverty, homelessness and, exploitive work constraints and, child mortality.

Image

Death was part of this institution and, the Jews were accustomed to impoverishment, it had continually been part of their lives and, as well, victimisation against them was always there, but when Hitler decided to invade, so that he could remove the Jews from civil society, that was when in 1935 there was the eruption of World War II.

Concentration camps were set up, in which prisoners were subjected to slave labour until they died of exhaustion or illness.  The occupiers ordered Jews and Romani to be restricted in overflowing segregated areas before being conveyed by freight train to death camps where, if they sustained the trip, almost all were systematically killed in gas chambers.

Image

Anyone with three or four Jewish grandparents was to be killed without exception.  In other mass murders, people were able to escape death by changing to another religion, or in some other way assimilating.  This was not accessible to the Jews of inhabited Europe.

A typical characteristic of Nazi genocide was the comprehensive use of human studies in medical testing.  Investigations included placing subjects into pressure chambers, testing drugs on them, freezing them, trying to alter eye colour by injecting chemicals into children’s eyes and, differing amputations and other surgeries.  A great deal of subjects that survived tests were almost always killed and anatomised soon afterwards.

Image

A large number of things altered after the war, primarily in Whitechapel and, almost all children that walk it now, have no memory of the Holocaust.  Some may have been told about it by their parents, but if you were to ask the greater part of young children if they knew what the ‘Holocaust’ was, they will have no actual concept.

I have asked children if they are instructed about the Holocaust in school and, a great deal of children just make light of it, shrug their shoulders and smile at me with awkwardness because they have no idea what I’m prattling on about.

The sheer number of Jews coming to the Eastend from other countries, eventually lead to the first Aliens Act 1905, which limited immigration into the country.  Jews were blamed for taking jobs from the locals and, of driving up rents by welcoming overcrowded conditions and, of aggravating the shocking working conditions in a great deal of the nearby trades.

Image

The Jewish immigrants had a clear aura in Spitalfields and, at first they manifested tight knit communities, preserving their own culture in this unfamiliar habitat.  Yiddish was dominant and, was used in signs, newspapers and, in theatres.

Image

Many small synagogues were constructed, supplying assistance as well as worship.  On Friday nights, the eve of the Sabbath, candles burnt in sitting room windows and, food was also significant, where neighbourhood shops sold bagels, salted herrings and pickled cucumbers and, by 1901 there were 15 kosher butchers in Wentworth Street.

Image

With time, nonetheless, the Jews became more unified and, it was said that children that left the Jews’ Free School in Bell Lane were nearly identical to English children.  Religious ceremonies as well slowly became less distinguishing and, not many people conversed in Yiddish.

Image

As the Jews increased in wealth, they relocated out to the more residential areas of Golders Green and Hendon.  There was little perceivable legacy left and, almost all of the synagogues were adapted for other uses and, shops and restaurants have closed, but there is still some attraction in the Jewish East End, with guided walks and excursions and, a synagogue has been found in an old Huguenot house in Princelet Street, which is now fittingly occupied as a museum of immigration.

A large number of synagogues have been renovated to make way for Mosques and, instead of it being the East End as the Jews knew it, it’s now Banglatown and, serves the expanding Bangladeshi community and, the Jews have withdrawn to other districts of less Jewish impact.

Brick Lane was formerly lined with Jewish bakeries and, places that you could go and get hearty Jewish food, it is still a hive of activity, but instead of a line of Jewish bakeries, there are countless Balti and curry houses on the road, which even hosts an international curry festival and, Bengali foods are on sale in the local shops and markets and, there is even a weekly paper, the ‘Sylheter Dak’.

Image

Image

Jewish culture is now being placed on the back burner, to make way for and, for the promotion of other cultures, in the space where the Jews once were and, now they have all gone to pastures new.  Once more, the Jews of the East End have wandered and, have become more and more distracted from their culture and, if they’re not cautious, their culture will become a far off recollection, with their possibilities unpromising.

Edward Snowden And The Security State

Image

Apart from the leaks themselves, Edward Snowden has revealed how the US government imposes confidentiality in the performance of spying on us.

Edward Snowden has given up nearly everything in his former pleasant life; so that we could know at least some of the way in which the US government is gathering information on us.

So, what will become of him, well, it’s doubtless that they will kill him, even though the current government has determined that it’s okay to kill US nationals unaccompanied by trial as long as they cite national self-defence, but Edward Snowden will front persistent pursuit and prosecution, for the foreseeable time ahead.

Edward Snowden is one of a long line of whistleblowers, notifying the US public about the NSA’s capabilities.  The NSA has an unlimited hunger for scrutiny and, has come predominately unmoored from any notable omissions or boundaries, but it’s Edward Snowden’s disclosure that appears to have kicked off an important and extensive discussion about the suitable boundaries of the US government’s ability to surveillance its inhabitants.

What is it about Edward Snowden’s revelation that is so distinctive?  It’s not the contents of the leak itself, for the details that Edward Snowden disclosed is reasonably small.

What made Edward Snowden’s revelation different and, exciting, was its uniqueness.  By notifying the public, through the newspaper, of a particular program and, its widely used commercial targets like Facebook and Google, he has established that the security state that lives inside the United States continues to grow.

The spread of information from WikiLeaks and, the cyberpunk collective Anonymous has revealed that anonymity can be a powerful implement in going against government confidentiality.

Image

Nevertheless, Snowden was aware, given his familiarity with the work of his past employers, that after disclosing the Prism document, he would be able to run, but not hide, but he did it anyhow.

State Of The Art Ripple Of Socialism

Image

We must stop working with the exempt stock market solidarity set up by Margaret Thatcher because Britain is at the moment afflicted with the largest decrease in living standards since Queen Victoria was seated on the throne.

If political pressure isn’t the central issue of the day, in that case the whole political structure may as well disappear on the foundation of irrelevance and moral bankruptcy.

It would be simple, but incorrect, to put all the responsibility at the feet of the sinful Tories, however sinful they may be.  The facts are that political pressure started six years prior to (the Siamese twins) David Cameron and Nick Clegg being attached at the hip.

But political pressure has currently been given refurbished power and extended continuation by the Tories take over of the monetary disaster.

As the Resolution Foundation has exposed is that one in five workers at present struggles far beneath the living wage: since 2009, the numbers have missiles from 3.4 million to 4.8 million.

Image

On the eve of Cameron’s expectation of power, 18 per cent of women worked for less than the living wage, it’s now a quarter.

Almost four out of five jobs generated under this government, pay less than £7.95 an hour.  These jobs are often unpredictable.   There is at the moment a million strong army of zero hour contract workers, a restoration to an assumed bygone era when dockers would journey to the yard, sticking their heads in the air in the hopefulness they might get some work that day.

Wages are; on average, £1,500 a year lower than when the Tory-Lib Dem camarilla rocked into power and, inflation has inflated for essential items, penalising the impoverished.

Image

Approximately a million children are assigned to be thrust into poverty by government policies, as stated by the Child Poverty Action Group.

For the first time since Berlin fell to the Allies, the following generation fronts being poorer than their parents and, the manifestations of political pressure are all around us.

We can merely hypothesise as to how monied executives decide to have fun with their 36 per cent increase in money making.

Predators have opulent easy pickings in David Cameron’s Britain and, a million families a month presently are contingent on legal loan sharks who are permitted to demand excessively high charges, often used to pay for food, heating, mortgages and rents.

Half a million people are dependent on food banks, whilst the Energy Bill Revolution campaign earlier this year established that almost a quarter of families had to decide between buying food or heating their homes.

Here’s to the seventh wealthiest nation in the world, whose poorest people strive to feed themselves.  Politicians relentlessly deliver a sermon about work as the way out of deprivation, but most of Britain’s impoverished have to work for their poverty.

And even though political pressure strikes those at the bottom the hardest, the pandemic of sleepless nights over bills, rents and mortgages are devouring the lives of millions of Britons.

If Labour had a set of lionhearted plans to confront political pressures, it wouldn’t have left a huge vacuum filled with personality impelled gossip.  As expected, the nonattendance of solutions has had even more catastrophic results, the underhanded, deplorable redirecting of rage at immigrants, public sector workers and, the unemployed people, anyone besides those accountable.

But such is the scale of the disaster that it requires fundamental answers, breaking with the free stock market consensus set up by Thatcher, a recently developed ripple of bread and butter socialism.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started