THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

A parent has been locked up for child neglectfulness following her 4 year old son was found sick, and shocking squalor in a home stuffed with 20 ferrets running loose and 14 dogs.

The youngster was taken to the high dependency unit at a Lancashire hospital, where he was only capable of taking food through a gastric tube.

He’d been living in entire uncleanness, a court heard, with litter, rotten food and animal excretions on the floor. There were as well two deceased birds in cages.

A policeman chanced upon the youngster who cannot be named for legal reasons at the dwelling in east Lancashire, when he called upon to look into a lost dog.

The boy’s 21 year old parent was sentenced to two years in prison at Preston Crown Court, Lancashire, for neglecting her offspring.

PC Lloyd Jones who discovered the youngster stated that the conditions he faced were the worst he had ever seen in his life.

PC Jones discovered the boy on a mattress.

He was so unwell he required a feeding tube in his stomach and had a severe bacterial infection in an open wound on his body.

Negligence was over an epoch of two months and looks to have started when the mother traveled from one dwelling to another.

Now the boy is only capable of taking food through a gastric tube.

The parent lived alone with him and an extremely extensive amount of animals, but when the police officers convened at the house about a missing dog, they came across a display of complete squalor. The home was squalid with waste, foodstuffs and animal wastes all over.

The photos are repulsive, and one can only wonder how a person can let a home get into that state.

An accomplished police officer characterized the conditions as the worst he had ever seen in his life.

Evidently the mother had been suffering from depression, and the situation in which she found herself was increasing and worsening as time went on and of course, in addition as well had a child who demanded more supervision than maybe some other children may have done.

The mother admits that she declined to care for her son in the way she ought to have done, and she has presented actual self-reproach and she has picked herself up by the bootstraps and has made attempts to move forward. She is also well informed that she might be given a custodial sentence and has written a letter to her son to be read to him if this is the case.

There will be no reoccur of this conduct, but that does not indicate she is not a young woman who plainly demands assistance and to analyze what went wrong during the last part of last year.

But Judge Russell explained to the accused, who had pleaded guilty to a charge of child neglect at an earlier hearing: ‘Although it has been argued that there was a lack of support available to you, I do not accept that argument because you had previously had support and knew it was available.

‘I do accept that you have had a difficult history. I also accept that you now acknowledge that your care was inadequate.

‘Such mitigation cannot extinguish the fact that this was very serious neglect. ’

Cases like this which entangle the ill-treatment of young kids are at all times exceedingly hard to deal with, but the sentence was welcomed, as this was an especially shocking incident of child negligence involving a defenseless 4 year old boy who was living in absolutely revolting conditions, and the home was in a totally unlivable state for anyone at all, let alone a tiny child, and thankfully he is presently being looked after properly.

 

 

 

 

 

These disturbing and deplorable RSPCA pictures display Fly who was underfed to a skeletal frame by her keeper.

The level of disregard was so severe in fact that a vet with 30 years of experience stated he had never seen a dog as emaciated either DEAD or ALIVE.

Tragically, Fly’s poor health and conditions signified she had to be humanely put to rest to stop her pain.

But presently her keeper David Lowe is facing a possible prohibition from taking care of animals as pets.

This incident comes just days after Katy Gammon emerged in court charged with leaving her pet boxer to die in her kitchen.

The 27-year-old lawyer from Bristol faces the likelihood of prison for the needless demise of a five year old dog Roxy, who was left free from nourishment or drinking water when she moved out.

Bolton occupant Lowe, 33, of Trentham Street in Farnworth, was subpoenaed to put in an appearance before the town’s magistrates’ court on February 24 but declined to attend.

The proceedings against him went ahead in any event and it was substantiated in his nonattendance that he caused fly needless distress by failing to seek veterinary attention.

A sentencing hearing at Bolton magistrates court was postponed yesterday for pre-sentence reports to be drawn up.

Tony Stock, prosecuting, stated: “This dog had suffered unnecessarily due to total neglect.”

Mr Stock stated RSPCA inspector Vicki McDonald called at Lowe’s flat after a tip-off from a member of the community on October 20 last year.

Fly, who was supposed to be 15 years old, was discovered lying in a bed in the kitchen.

Inspector McDonald was instantly disturbed by the level of boniness. She cautioned the defendant, and he verified that he owned the dog.

He said that up till a couple of weeks ago his former partner had been accountable for the dog as well as him.

The court heard she had given him money to have the dog put down, but Lowe didn’t.

Vet Angus McKenzie stated Fly was the most seriously starved dog he had seen either dead or alive in more than 30 years.

The court heard she was dehydrated and judged as naught in a body condition scale, with a grade of one being identified as emaciated.

She was as well more than half the weight she should have been and was experiencing a dental malady, a heart murmur and diabetes.

Fly was without delay signed over to RSPCA supervision, but Mr Stock stated that because of her intensifying conditions, the only compassionate direction was to put her to sleep.

The saddening thing about the incident is that separately, the conditions were all treatable and controllable had veterinary guidance been endeavored at an earlier stage and acted upon.

The court heard Lowe has been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and was earlier desolate. The dog, the court heard, was brought back to him in a pitiful state.

However, no 15 year old dog should look like that. Separately, each of her conditions could have been treated but because they were collectively, it was compassionate to put her to sleep.

Every time some person comes across a slim dog in his/her post you’d imagine it is the thinnest you have seen, but she was the most starved dog, and the most emaciated. It is hard to think that she was still even alive, and that is not acceptable. It is deplorable.

Lowe will be pronounced with a judgment on April 16.

There is no guiltlessness in this action of abandonment, and to abandon a living thing and leave it for dead. Once upon a time this dog was a spirited creature, full of vitality for its keeper, but its situation ended up being one that cannot be characterized into words because it is only something one would hear about in folk tale, and in a world of amusement.

It appears that the world is a cruel place, whether human or animal, for we are all creatures of this world, living like the beasts that we are. We have not evolved and developed into a better creation, but have learnt to amuse ourselves with the games, a distraction that some of us clearly call leisurely pursuits, and one that we happily call a pastime.

Is this a hobby that we suddenly have, depriving food to needy helpless creatures till they are no longer viable? Is this what we presently call pleasure? How does this, or would this stimulate our senses?

As human beings we should be conscious of the difference separating right and wrong, for it is not just improper and unlawful to do such a thing to an animal, but some people will slaughter an animal because portions of their cadaver are valuable, and people will pay suitable money to wear or beautify themselves for gems that have been taken from that animal.

It’s a discouraging situation however you see it. If a creature kills another animal because it is simply feeding time, then that of course is how it should be, continuation of the well-contrived. Even though, one might state that human beings don’t kill each other for food, nevertheless, human beings do murder one another, even though not all humans practice this.

Survival of the fittest is how it has always been, to slay for sustenance to sustain, but when we slaughter for enjoyment then that is not endurance, that is annihilation of those that sustained so that they can be fodder for those that take delight in taking what is not theirs, and that is another life, whether that be animal or man.

A man, woman, or child of the classes Homo sapiens, which is recognized from other creatures by higher cerebral growth, skill of lucid speech, and standing posture, is known as a Human Being, and by being known as that makes us more bright, but if we do not have the capacity to know that to deprive of food to a lower creature, and to cause its death, or killing for enjoyment is not right, then how are we the more astute?

Evoluation had it all wrong. We should never have come out of the tree’s…

 

 

 

In my neighbourhood, the council depleted nearly £ 4.6 million on electricity for street lighting per year. Switching to part night lighting will evidently reclaim roughly £1 million per year and in addition decrease the carbon discharges by over 8,000 tonnes per year. This will as well add to decreased light pollution.

Part night lighting has been in force in Maldon and Uttlesford since early 2007, where street lights are switched off between 12 midnight and 5am, with a few exceptions such as town centres, key road junctions and accident assemblage sites, and apparently this has not resulted in an expansion in listed crime or road crashes in the two districts. Certain areas meeting the exclusion criteria will continue to be illuminated through the night, such as sites where there are a lot of conflicting traffic movements, such as roundabouts, which are on vital roads, usually those illuminated by pillars bigger than 6m high.

Localities where street lights are set up as a consequence of accident remedial measures, and Town Centre areas where there is one or more of the following features, such as, publicly maintained CCTV, a high proportion of high security premises, such as banks, or jewellers, areas of high crime risk, a high assembly of people at night such as transport intersections, or nightclubs etc, central approaches to town centre areas where there is a blend of development separating residential and commercial/industrial, but not solely home-owning, sections where the police can show that there is probably an expansion in crime if the lights are turned off during part of the night, or that there will be an abatement in crime if the lights are turned back on, where there is a legal demand to provide lighting, and lighting for road signs, traffic bollards etc., will not be affected.

There are a lot of advantages to street lighting. It can be put to use to help protection in town neighborhoods and to lengthen the quality of life by artificially extending the hours in which it is light so that activity can take place.

Street lighting as well improves safekeeping for motorists, cyclists, and the foot-traveller. Driving outside of daytime hours is increasingly hazardous, just a quarter of all excursions by car drivers is inside the hours of 7pm and 8am, nevertheless, this period record for 40% of fatal and grave traumas to the same group.

Foot-travellers and unprotected road users suffer from diminished range of vision in the dark too. For this reason, ways of reducing the danger to all road users during the hours of dark must be attained.

A recent study by the Department for Transport found that road safety was observed as an essential advantage for street lighting improvement. In the investigation, 73% of respondents concurred that better street lighting would enhance the safety of children, and 63.8% agreed that enhanced street lighting would lead to fewer mishaps on the roads.

As well as the public understanding that better lighting enhances safety, investigation that collates the nature of road lighting to accident reduction, discovered that it enhances safety. The most extensive investigation of street lighting to date was conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration which performed a well-organized revision of the literature and discovered 17 studies on the introduction of street lighting.

The author’s judgment of investigating the studies was street lighting can avert road traffic accidents, traumas and casualties. Nevertheless, additional well designed investigations are needed in order to ascertain the effectiveness of street lighting in the middle and low-income countries.

The presence of lighting not just decreases the danger of traffic accidents, but in addition their severity. Studies have displayed that the citizens are in support of street lighting as a way of showing improvement on road safety and that, if anything, it is required to be improved in a few areas.

There are financial and environmental intentions why some organisations may want to reduce the volume of lighting. Nevertheless there are safety reasons why lighting has to be accessible.

In a few areas, a decrease in lighting quality may not increase the danger of an accident. Yet, there is a danger that an unconsidered removal or reduction in quality could in fact increase accidents and their severity.

Consequently, when contemplating removal or dimming of lights, location based traffic and accident proof should be evaluated. Accident rates should be respected to warrant that sacrificing the condition of lighting does not excessively extend the risk.

Increases in risk may eventually lead to lives being dropped. In some locations, a reduction in lighting quality may not increase the risk of an accident.

However, there is a risk that an unconsidered removal or reduction in quality could actually increase accidents and their severity. Therefore, when considering removal or dimming of lights, location based traffic and accident evidence should be assessed.

Accident rates should be controlled to ensure that sacrificing the quality of lighting does not unduly increase the risk. Increases in risk may ultimately lead to lives being dropped.

Nevertheless, there is no constitutional demand for councils in the United Kingdom to furnish civic lighting. The constitution says that the Highways Act permits councils to illuminate roadways but does not dispose an obligation on them to do so.

The council has an obligation of supervision to road users and has a commitment to light obstacles on the highway. The council has an obligation under the Highways Act to guarantee the safety of the highway, and this includes any lighting material located on the highway.

The Electricity at Work Regulations imposes a duty on owners and operatives of electrical equipment to guarantee its safety. One of the aims of the part-night lighting is to decrease the long term perils of energy price increments and economic penalties from carbon burning.

To reach this end, the number of lights that can safely be part night lit needs to be increased. Each road will be evaluated against the criteria using the information provided by the road safety team and community safety team prior to any lights being turned off.

Street lights at primary roundabouts and junctions, at pedestrian crossings, traffic lights, speed bumps or chicanes which are required to ensure road safety will not be turned off. It’s as well important to bear in mind that only a tiny number of lights, one per cent of the total number of lights in the county will be turned off permanently.

The vast majority of lights will only be turned off from about midnight, when nearly all drivers are not on the road, to about 5.30am, before the morning rush starts, and if a street light is turned off on the highway it will still need to be regularly examined to guarantee its structural safety, and electrical safety if the service cable is retained in the lighting pillar.

A number of people have inquired as to for what cause? Lights cannot be dimmed, and evidently it would be too costly for the lights to be dimmed at night, and not all lights can be dimmed, and that they can only get an adequate savings and return on their investment from the most powerful lights, and they are dimming those on new or refurbished installations. They will not be dimming less powerful lights because the dimmer units might require replacing prior to being compensated for themselves in terms of decreased electricity expenses.

Lights in home-owning areas where cars are liable to be parked on the road during the night are simply being turned off between midnight and 5:30am when traffic flows are likely to be exceedingly low. Vehicle speeds are as well likely to be minimal as these areas have a 30 mph speed limit and speeds are as well reduced by speed bumps, the confinement of the road and the presence of parked cars.

In view of the extremely low traffic volumes and low speed of transportation, the hazards of accidents are looked upon as minute. Nevertheless, if you are parking your vehicle during the night on the road, you do have an accountability to park in a way to assure other road users can see your vehicle.

It does not specify however the use of emergency services on the roads late at night in unlighted areas, and how harmful it can be for the emergency services, and to the masses who are in need of medical attention in the middle of the night. This is not making their situations any easier when they are racing to get to defenseless people in need of help, in the instances where somebody might be having a heart attack, a life threatening situation that requires critical medical attention, and is not because the ambulance service is consuming more time attempting to locate a dwelling in the dark, when they could be with the patient, and rushing them to the hospital before they die.

I myself have been in a comparable condition not so long ago when I had to ring (up) 999 for an ambulance, and it took them an extra 10 minutes to locate my home. I found myself in agonizing pain, and my heart was running a race at 210 beats a minute.

I have experienced problems with my heart all my life, so I have to call on emergency services when it becomes defective, and have to be taken to the hospital. Plainly no thought has gone into what occurs when emergency services need to be called upon, not just for an ambulance, but it could be for the police, or even the fire department.

In the case of a fire, by the time the fire department has reached a blazing residence, and have determined where the fire is. Lives could have been taken.

Without doubt lives are a lesser consequence than money, but surely you don’t need a qualification to recognize that a life is more important than money could ever be, because once a life has come to an end it can never be recovered, whereas money can without exception be regained. As for carbon emissions, every time we burn fossil fuels such as gas, coal or oil, carbon dioxide is delivered into the air.

In a normal carbon cycle, carbon dioxide is re-absorbed by plants and trees. Nevertheless, we are burning fuels where the carbon dioxide has been trapped under the earth’s surface for millions of years, and we’re doing it so swiftly that plants and trees that are living now have no chance of being saturated, and it doesn’t help that we’re cutting down rainforests as well.

The force of all this additional carbon dioxide in the air is that the overall temperature of the planet is expanding, what we call global warming. Whilst the normal global temperature is expanding, on a day-to-day level the climate is altering in variable ways, from floods and hurricanes to heat waves and dry seasons.

To attempt and decrease the danger of ever more radical weather, we must lessen to diminish how much fossil fuel we are burning, and this isn’t simple. However, one council in Basildon, Essex wants to stop the County Hall’s late-night blackout by installing its own LED lamps on streetlights.

John Dornan, councillor responsible for the environment, has told officers to look at examining how they could pay out for the stratagem themselves. Installing energy-efficient LED lights would significantly cut down County Hall’s electrical bill.

However, under the plans Essex County Council would however foot that bill. Transport chiefs at County Hall responded adversely when the scheme was originally ask questions.

Mr Dornan has directed consultations on the streetlights with County Hall, and since the lights have gone out, this is increasing partial adherence and there have been an awful number of push backs from tenants. The lights went out from midnight to 5am on the majority of streets in Basildon last month following Essex County Council pressed through the propositions, in spite of anger from apprehensive tenants.

Basildon Council would pay for the energy-efficient bulbs using a one-off capital payment, with LEDs created to decrease energy bills, which then County Hall would pick up. It is considered about 60 to 70 per cent could be cut off local authority energy bills by putting in the lamps.

More and more councils, including Southend, have elected to put in the lamps to free cash sooner than roll-out a schedule of switch offs. County Hall will free roughly about £222,000 a year by turning off the lamps in Basildon, but Mr Dornan stated that the cost would again be drastically diminished with LED bulbs, which as well have a lengthier lifespan compared to conventional lights.

Mr Dornan said further: “To me it is a win-win situation, as tenants get their lights back on and county make savings, even if over an extended period.”

He insisted the authority could draw money out of its £24 million of savings, or accept the loan of the cash. In Southend, the Tory administration has consumed £2.65million installing the modern bulbs, in a five a year rotating programme.

Essex County Council declined to state why it had originally turned down Basildon Council’s proposal.

The removal of street lighting can only indicate that there will surely be a stirring of robberies in nearly all neighborhoods, which will become more sizable as time permits, and as well a chain of other offenses, and I am enraged how human lives are put behind economic gain, to obtain as much capital as they can.

You don’t need a certificate in diplomacy to recognize that this is so off balance, and that the only goal here is merely MONEY.

Human life was not at any time part of this compromise…  

A mum has passed away in hospital in Argentina after inserting Vaseline into her breasts to make them larger.  Sonia Perez Llanzon, 39, underwent a deadly blood clotting in her lungs a month after being admitted to hospital with respiratory difficulties following the unsafe procedure.

Police cadet son Kevin Berazategui, 20, wrote on his Facebook page: “I will love you for ever”, and announced that the 20 years he spent by his mother’s side were beautiful.

Sonia Perez Llanzon arrived at hospital with traumas to her breasts, but she denied everything at the beginning but then admitted she had inserted Vaseline into them. The human body has an immune response or defense to get rid of bacteria and microorganisms, but it hasn’t got any mechanisms against this kind of product, and other people using vaseline like this are putting themselves at risk.

Sonia, was an esteemed runner and keen boxer, but had experienced third degree burns last year whilst sunbathing, and she was lain down by her appearance.

Doctors have forewarned in the past about expanding amounts of men injecting themselves with Vaseline, which is composed of crude oil, to enlarge the measurement of their penises, which generates impairments which consist of severe deformations caused by tissue damage and erectile dysfunction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than 46,000 supporters have signed the Sophie’s Choice appeal calling for the age of smear tests to be cut back to 16 years old. The call comes after ambitious model Sophie Jones passed away from cervical cancer after being declined a potentially life saving smear test.

Sophie, 19, from Eastham, Wirral, was at first told she had Crohn’s disease and experienced crippling stomach pain. However, clumsy physicians disregarded Sophie’s requests for an examination and stated she was too young to get cervical cancer, which is very uncommon in women below 25.

Her situation took a turn for the worse and in November when doctors at last discovered the cancer, which had radiated and destroyed her body. She died in the early hours of Saturday morning.

Her family and friends have upheld an e-petition asking for the age of cervical screening to be decreased, and in just a few days, thousands have promised their help.

Her parents want to take their crusade to the Prime Minister David Cameron in the strength of preventing more young women from dying from the illness. Having smear tests for women at 25 or over is just ludicrous, at the very least people should be granted an option.

In June 2009, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Department of Health (Ann Keen), announced in a Written Ministerial Statement of 13th March 2009, requesting the Independent Advisory Committee on Cervical Screening (ACCS) to formally evaluate the data associated to dangers and advantages of cervical screening in women below 25 years, including current data regarding occurrence and fatality in young women.

The review took place at an extraordinary gathering of the ACCS held on 19th May 2009. The ACCS is a self-governing ministerially selected committee, with nearly all members specified by their respective expert bodies. A number of guests were as well asked to the review meeting to guarantee all views and accessible data were listened to, involving the voluntary sector and sick individuals.

No new scientific data was made known to the review meeting to maintain the reintroduction of screening in women under 25. In fact, a bit of fresh data was exhibited showing that screening is of little or no advantage in women in this age group. There are data that treatment following screening in this age group can lead to an extended danger of succeeding premature births, expanding the chance of babies dying or having severe handicaps. Data were as well exhibited that exposed there has been no notable expansion in the amount of women aged below 25 contracting or dying from cervical cancer since the strategy altered in 2004.

Members of the committee were united that there was no logic to reduce the age at which screening commences, which has to be in conformity with international recommendations.

Members of the committee were, nevertheless, troubled that young women who present to their GPs with gynaecological traits are not invariably being given proper guidance. They fully advised that the Department of Health should take additional action in this sphere, and the ACCS will be reflecting how best to follow this forward as an interest of gravity at their meeting on 25th June 2009. Members as well sanctioned that more endeavor is made in extending the uptake of cervical screening in women aged 25 to 34, where coverage has been sinking in current years, and stated that they would expand methods with NHS Cancer Screening Programmes and the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative to take this forward.

The committee will keep the decision strictly under reconsideration, particularly by watching the occurrence of cervical cancer in young women. In the interests of clarity, the minutes of the review meeting have been placed in the House of Commons Library is able to be made accessible on the Department of Health website.

We have girls having boob jobs on the NHS, and in spite of that, the price of a smear is too much.

Sophie Jones was aware something was off balance, she knew her body was telling her something, however because of her age it wasn’t even considered. It was February last year when she first knew something was off balance, and she started having stomach spasms as well.

Everybody was convinced she had Crohn’s disease, but when the following tests couldn’t discover something was wrong she was at last sent to gynaecology. By the time they discovered the cancer it had by now radiated, there wasn’t much they could do but lengthen her life.

She wanted to do the appeal herself, and she thought she would do it once she got better, however, clearly that wasn’t supposed to be. The family wants to prevent other people going through what they did and what Sophie went through. That would make it worth it.

If more than 100,00 people endorse the Sophie’s Choice petition an argumentation could be maintained in the Houses of Parliament on the matter of cervical screening. The lower age boundary for conventional examination in England is 25 because the condition is so uncommon.

No girls below the age of 20 died from the illness within 2009 and 2011 according to Cancer Research UK’s most current statistics, indicating Sophie was one of the youngest ever prey of the disease.

This beautiful young woman was the life and substance of the universe, and just illuminated the place, and this should have never taken place.

The appeal was started on the day that Sophie passed away for the reason that she was hopeful they could make certain other young woman did not experience the same fate.

Sophie was told that she was too young to possibly have the illness, however, by the time they diagnosed her it was too late, nevertheless, hopefully this appeal will make a difference.

 

Social media has swiftly become synonymous with greater connectivity. With an easy click or swipe we are able to connect to hundreds, if not thousands of people, a few of which we have known since primary school and others we’ve at no time even met in person but share enough interests with to have crossed each others virtual pathway. On the exterior we may appear more interconnected than ever before, but this video put together by Shimi Cohen displays to us that when it comes to intercommunication, quantity does not trump quality. More importantly, social media may be the directing reason as to why we are instead more solitary than we have ever been before, check it out:

The video itself was done as a final project for a college, but is the foundation on both the words of Sherry Turkle at a recent Ted Talk called ‘Connected, But Alone,’ and Dr. Yair Amichai-Hamburgers Hebrew essay ‘The Invention of Loneliness.’

There were a number of points made in this video that really stood out as momentous and/or impactful. The first to actually hit was that we are seemingly innate communicative beings yet we live in a cosmos that not only actively promotes but even celebrates personality. Personal achieving that possibly ripples out into one’s immediate family is the basic goal of so many of us and can frequently thrust us to a point where we will either totally neglect or even negatively influence another entirely for our own gain. There are visible exclusions such as team work projects or even formulated team sports, but even within those obvious associated pursuits, specific productivity and statistics are not simply measured but celebrated.

The next concept to really stand out was the reminder of the common thought that time = money and how much we let that rule our everyday life. The more we are constrained and expected both internally and externally to accomplish more and more, the more constrained we are to serve on judgment and value all things that we do. This can usually lead to us putting only certain things in the classification of deserving our full attention, while everything else is expedited as much as possible. This, as the video showed, is where social media steps in as the ultimate expediter of intercommunication, using quantity to dupe us into thinking we not only have a functioning social life but as well that we have a lot of friends. Think about it, how many of your Facebook friends do you in fact stay in close communication with? If you’re fortunate, it’s probably at the maximum 150 of them (again from the video), and of those 150, how many in fact know you for who you actually are?

The outcome: an extensively connected but in fact entirely detached state of humanity.

The hurdle now becomes for us to ensure that we don’t let social media become the only manner of socialization that we not only exercise as well, but also appreciate. We can make use of it for the incredible tool that it is, but only as our truest selves and not as an edited online individuality. It’s time for us to embrace who we really are. Reconnect with one another through discussion and not just through a like or share, and we might just find ourselves a little less isolated.

A mentally sick woman was coerced into the Coalition’s Work Programme, and is presently in a coma, but is still being sent letters by benefits assessors.

Bipolar sufferer Sheila Holt, 47, was sectioned in December following being taken off Income Support.  Days following being taken off Income Support she had a heart attack and sank into a coma.

This weekend, Miss Holt, of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, was forwarded a letter by Atos to inquire why she was not holding down a position.

I know that a few people are in support of welfare reformation, but attempting to bulldoze through reformations in a thoughtless and uncaring way is not the right way to go about it.

This government is provoking a tremendous amount of harm, and I have no qualms that Sheila’s story is being played over up an down the country.

This lady has a complicated impediment provoked by a severe ordeal in her youth, and you cannot aggressively push defenseless people, similar to Sheila back into employment because it can have, as we’ve observed, exceedingly severe health consequences, and it’s just not appropriate what they’ve done.

Miss Holt had not had a position in employment for 26 years, and anybody who knew her would tell you she couldn’t do a job.

Regrettably, some illness not in any way get better, they either stay the same or get worse, and there are a few situations that can trigger their poor health or disability to become exceedingly harmful, and anyone with a measure of intellect would recognize that it’s grossly criminal to structure something for somebody that has no structure in their lives anymore.

If a person hasn’t earned a living for 26 years because of ill health, and that signifies any class of ill health, then the well-being of that person should come first and foremost, because they clearly wouldn’t have the disposition to deal with this sort of disturbance in their lives.

Situations at times become a way of life, and if there is a longing to alter that because it might be that we want to, or we are requested, then plainly this has to be done over a period of time, particularly if that person is physically challenged, mentally unwell or just of ailing health.

A person’s well-being is in danger if a person senses that they have lost their security net, and in jeopardizing that, one must comprehend that a person could not preserve his/her physical or mental state because there really would be no help for them. Not only that, it as well undermines them and wears down their self-esteem, until in the end it kills them.

This is this not just unlawful homicide, because with all the confusion in their lives that the Department for Work and Pensions are putting them through, which can be extremely unpleasant for a people, particularly somebody with mental health concerns, the Governments proposals have no place for sentimentality because they do not class us as Human Beings, but merely factory fodder, the manure of society, which is associated with scrounging and a scourge on society.

There are structures inside the Government, and the ruling classes that are solely there to repress their herds because we are solely thought of as an asset and nothing exceeding that, and once we are no longer of usefulness to them, they forsake us because we decline to be of any use to them.

We become simply what the lavatory is used for, and consequently it’s apparent that we must resolve and barter our position in the human chain because we are unquestionably without any significance to anyone once we no longer have the capability to do a day’s work, but we are all equal, even though it appears some are more equal than others.

Sheila Holt is in a coma, but she’s still required to work, even when in a coma. Does this indicate that everyone is required to do a day’s work even when they are in stasis? Does that signify that we must work as a drone in a collective?

You must comply, resistance is futile, even when in a coma…

Councils are shelling out the cash for the Royal Family for the rent of hard up householders who rely on the payments just to keep a roof over their heads. Hard up families are fighting to cope with crippling rises in living expenses, and are already enraged that private landlords rake in thousands of pounds from housing benefits, but many will be even more infuriated to discover Prince Charles and the Queen are also making cash from hard up householders who rely on the payments just to keep a roof over their heads.

The duo receives tens of thousands of pounds a year in housing benefits that are provided by local authorities to landlords.  Charles’ Duchy of Cornwall Estate, which has a collection of holdings over the South West, raked in at least £111,000 from a chain of councils providing cash to homes, and the Crown Estate, which gives the Queen 15% of its earnings, received at least £38,539 in housing benefit payments from just one town hall last year, but the precise figure of such payments received by the Duchy is probable to be higher as a few councils stated they were only capable of providing amounts delivered straight to landlords and not where the money was given first to the householder.

The estate, which is worth £847 million and free from tax, paid Prince Charles £19 million last year whereas the Queen is worth £320 million.

Disclosures came a day after it was disclosed Britain’s wealthiest MP. Tory Richard Benyon, obtained thousands of pounds last year in housing benefits from his householders. That’s in spite of him blasting the something for nothing welfare state.

Matters have come to a delightful ravine when even the nobles are behaving as between men and getting benefits for their householders when they could simply hand the homes over to a housing association.

Campaigners Defend Council Housing joined the increasing stop for a cap on the sum of housing benefit private landlords are permitted, because after all Prince Charles was brought up in the largest council house in Britain, Buckingham Palace.

There should be regulations on the amount of rent that is payable to landlords like him, and if the Duchy of Cornwall paid its fair quota of taxes we could manage the money to construct brand-new high class council housing for the benefit of the country.

The housing benefit bill has expanded hugely, and more than £9 billion will be paid this year to private landlords, and taxpayers’ money is being used to line the pockets of moneyed landlords and property stockholders.

Moneyed landlords presently see the welfare state as a business, and its intention is to put public money into private hands.  The truthfulness is, this is not housing benefit, it is landlords’s benefit.

In 1980, for every £20 that was dispensed on housing people, £16 went on erecting houses, and £4 went on aiding people pay rent. Right now, £19 goes on helping people pay rent and just £1 on fabrication of homes.  So we have gone from subsidising councils to construct houses to subsidise private landlords to expand their property empires.