Daniel Kretinsky’s EP Group Buys Royal Mail For £3.57 Billion

The board of International Distribution Services, which owns Royal Mail, said that it has accepted a £3.57 billion buyout bid from the EP Group, led by Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky.

Businessman Mr Kretinsky already owned more than a quarter of IDS, which controls Royal Mail, Parcelforce, and the international mailing service GLS.

Known as the ‘Czech Sphinx’ for his inscrutable nature, his purchase of IDS – which may yet be subject to government scrutiny – could take the UK’s 500-year-old postal service into full foreign ownership for the first time. 

The postal service must maintain its UK headquarters and tax residence to remain connected to Britain, and the EP Group’s bid, which is valued at 370p per share, complies with this requirement from IDS executives.

However, the deal looks set to include Royal Mail’s pending ask of delivering second class post every other weekday – which it applied to Ofcom for earlier this month, pending consultation.

Shareholders will vote on the deal at IDS’s next annual general meeting in September – at a perilous time for Britain’s universal postal service. The deal values the group at £5.2 billion.

Keith Williams, chairman of the company, said: ‘IDS has the potential to become a leading international logistics player.

‘Both the IDS board and EP are acutely aware of their responsibilities to IDS and particularly to the unique heritage of Royal Mail and its obligations as the designated Universal Service Provider of postal services in the UK.

‘The IDS Board has negotiated a far-reaching package of legally binding undertakings and commitments which provide our customers, employees and broader stakeholders with important safeguards.

‘These cover the provision of the one-price-goes-anywhere Universal Service Obligation (including First Class letters still delivered six days a week), the financial stability and maintenance of the IDS Group including Royal Mail, the maintenance of employee benefits and pensions, and ensuring Royal Mail remains headquartered and tax resident in the UK.’

These promises, coupled with a vow not to take away the company’s assets and to continue using the Royal Mail brand and Royal Cypher, are only guaranteed for the first five years of Mr. Kretinsky’s ownership of IDS.

These assurances, coupled with commitments to acknowledge unions and keep providing first-rate posts six days a week, are not guaranteed to stay in effect after five years.

Mr Kretinsky said he had the ‘utmost respect for Royal Mail’s history and tradition’. The deal is not believed to come with any requirements of redundancies beyond those factored into the Royal Mail’s existing cost-cutting plans.

We have been let down by successive Governments for decades. To selling off our gold cheaply and those raiding our pensions, as well as, selling off our industries and key national assets.

Because it was British with royal authorisation, it was known as Royal Mail. Since it will no longer be controlled by the British, how in the world can it remain under that name?

Our power has been sold off, our water and now our postal service, where the service goes down the pan and prices go up.

Trans Children, LGBTQ Community: Richard Dreyfuss

An attendee at Richard Dreyfuss’s question and answer session in Massachusetts over Memorial Day weekend told DailyMail.Com the Oscar-winner ‘kept going’ with homophobic and racist comments during his appearance. 

Dreyfuss, 76, was attending the $300 per person showing of Jaws, the hit movie that began his legendary career in 1975, at The Cabot, a Beverley, Massachusetts, cinema.

The renowned actor took his opportunity to rail against the MeToo movement, transgender children, and the legendary Barbra Streisand after taking to the stage wearing a dress. 

Kerry, one of the attendees, told DailyMail.com that she was visiting The Cabot with her sister as a birthday present.

‘He started the night by coming out in a dress and dancing to Taylor Swift, saying that this was an LGBTQ moment. I assumed he was horsing around; later, a staff member told me he was walking around town for a couple of hours picking one out,’ she said.

Kerry said that the show then got back on the rails with Dreyfuss discussing his role in another Steven Spielberg classic, 1978’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

From there, however, Kerry said Dreyfuss went off, targeting his Nuts co-star Barbra Streisand. ‘He began to say a lot of sexist things about her, about all women. They’re stupid, they shouldn’t have any power, etc.’ He continued.

Other accounts say that Dreyfuss accused women of being ‘passive’ which is why the 1987 film Nuts ‘sucked.’ 

‘Then he just kept going with homophobic and racist comments. He insulted the MeToo movement, etc.’ 

Another member of the crowd said Dreyfuss said that society, ‘Shouldn’t be listening to some 10-year-old who says they want to be a boy instead of a girl.’ 

Kerry said that the atmosphere in the theatre quickly soured, with many booing the star and some walking out. ‘Now, now, don’t turn into an angry mob,’ Dreyfuss told the crowd, according to Kerry.

Kerry alleged that an employee of The Cabot told her that staff had been told to prepare for Dreyfuss’s bizarre behaviour the night before a similar incident occurred at a similar event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. 

An attendee of that show was quoted by Deadline as saying: ‘I walked out tonight because of [Dreyfuss’s] small-minded, bigoted view of women and choice.’ 

At one point during his Cabot show, Dreyfuss said: ‘We’re so fragile that we can’t have our feelings hurt. We don’t know how to stand up and bop the bully in the face.’

‘There is a time and place for that stuff, most likely a Republican rally, but not at a Jaws event.’

‘He’s rich; entitled; he didn’t care about anyone but himself last night. It was never a discussion; it was him being ignorant and inappropriate. I expected better.’

‘Someone should ask Steven Spielberg what he thinks about Dreyfuss saying these things at a showing of his movie,’ Kerry added. 

The attendee went on to say that she felt as though Dreyfuss was doing something for a book. ‘I felt he was conducting a warped social experiment to prove some points in his book. That we can’t disagree on things civilly, etc., that’s my opinion,’ Kerry said. 

In 2022, Dreyfuss published his book One Thought Scares Me: We Teach Our Children What We Wish Them to Know; We Don’t Teach Our Children What We Don’t Wish Them to Know, which dealt with the subject of teaching civics in American schools.

The actor is passionate about the cause of civic education. 

It is never appropriate to praise hate speech. Richard Dreyfuss displayed his ignorance and callousness.

Some might say that it’s not hate speech and that it’s only an opinion like it was only an opinion when Hitler persecuted the Jews – remember that Richard Dreyfuss?

Everybody is entitled to be what they want to be, and people who do not believe that being transgender or LGBTQ is natural, well, there are two types of male oysters, and one of them can change genders at will, and before man crawled out of the muck, maybe he had the same option. Maybe originally we were supposed to be able to switch genders, and being born with just one sex is a mutation. Clearly, Richard Dreyfuss was that mutation! And I welcome the bigoted man to say differently.

Rishi Sunak’s Controversial Election Plan Could Fine Parents If Their 18-Year-Olds Don’t Do National Service 

Parents may be fined if their adult children fail to do their National Service when they turn 18, a minister suggested today.

In response to Rishi Sunak’s election plan to force teenagers to serve a year in the military or perform unpaid weekend community labour, Anne-Marie Trevelyan declined to rule out financial penalties.

The proposition was made public and has since sparked the first significant controversy of the upcoming general election campaign.

The Foreign Office Minister, Ms Trevelyan, stated that a Royal Commission would outline many of the scheme’s specifics and declined to rule out penalising parents whose adult offspring declined to participate.

She also suggested that carers and young members of the Royal family would be expected to take part.

However, criticism of the scheme has increased. Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer branded it a ‘teenage Dad’s Army’ in a speech today.

Perhaps the most startling critique came from a second senior minister,ister who said they had been taken by surprise by the plan.

Writing on social media, Steve Baker, the Northern Ireland Minister, suggested had it been a government policy, he would have had a say because of the particular sensitives around Northern Ireland.

He said: ‘Government policy would have been developed by ministers on the advice of officials and collectively agreed. I would have had a say on behalf of NI.

‘But this proposal was developed by a political adviser or advisers and sprung on candidates, some of whom are relevant ministers.’

According to the manifesto, all 18-year-olds would serve one year in the armed forces in a paid position or dedicate one weekend a month to volunteer work in the community.

Writing for MailOnline today Ms Trevelyan said that those volunteering for the military would not be sent to fight, and that the scheme would teach practical and soft skills ‘which cannot be taught in the classroom or the lecture theatre’.

However, opponents from both political parties have written off the proposals as nonsensical, and prominent military personnel have voiced doubts about their viability and recommended that the funds would be better used for investments in the armed forces.

Asked about whether young royals would be made to take part, or teenagers with caring responsibilities, Ms Trevelyan told Sky News it would be down to a Royal Commission to decide the scope.

The return of National Service is a good idea since it helps young people mature into men and women and instils in them values of discipline and respect. However, it should not be implemented carelessly, as many politicians—Sir Keir Starmer in particular—do.

There are so many young people out of work and not looking for work, this will help address that, with youngsters getting new experiences, a career and new friendships.

This should be a compulsory measure by our government, not a fine measure that parents have to fork out for. Eighteen-year-olds are neither kids nor adults, they are the inbetweeners, and if they feel they don’t want to do National Service, then they should remain in education until they’re twenty-five. There would be less unemployment for start.

There should be no provisions stating that your child would be immediately disqualified if they attend private school or if they have a parent or parents named Portia or Xander. This should apply to everyone!

The problem that is, this has not been thought out well. National Service, is great! However, there aren’t enough housing, weaponry or training facilities available for our present soldiers, let alone new ones.

The 16-Year-Old Vote Plan By Keir Starmer 

Keir Starmer’s plan to give 16-year-olds the right to vote would ‘rig’ the electoral system against the Conservatives for years to come, Tories have claimed.

If the Labour leader wins the July general election, he allegedly intends to decrease the voting age in his first year in office.

More than 1.5 million people under the age of 18 would be granted the ability to vote, making it the biggest modification to the electoral system since the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1969.

Sir Keir said: ‘Yes, I want to see 16 and 17-year-olds voting. If you can work, if you can pay tax, if you can serve in your Armed Forces, then you ought to be able to vote.’

Speaking on a visit to Stafford, Sir Keir added that young people ‘should have a say on how their money is being used’.

Opponents argue young people are too immature to make informed political judgments, with the policy branded ‘cynical’ because it is expected to benefit Labour.

Tory MP Tom Hunt said it was ‘an attempt by Labour to rig the vote in their favour’, adding: ‘The motivation behind this is perceived political self-interest, nothing else.’

Fellow Tory MP Bob Seely said: ‘Labour haven’t even won and already they are trying to rig the voting system. 

‘Perhaps Labour think younger voters will be easier to pull the wool over than older folks with a bit of life experience.’

And Sir Iain Duncan Smith accused Sir Keir of ‘virtue signalling’, adding: ‘This is a gimmick done by those who think their party is more likely to get the vote.’

Labour has been closely studying how Scotland and Wales cut the voting age. In Scotland, those aged 16 can vote in local and Scottish Parliament elections, while in Wales they can vote in local and Welsh Parliament elections.

In Scotland, the procedure took less than six months, whilst the Welsh law was enacted less than a year after it was first proposed.

A Labour source told The Times the move ‘has the double benefit of not costing very much to do but of helping secure a second Labour term’. Analysis by the newspaper showed that if 16 and 17-year-olds voted in the same way as those aged 18-24, an extra eight seats would switch from the Tories to Labour.

Ashfield MP Lee Anderson, while he was Tory party deputy chairman, said extending the vote to 16-year-olds would mean the Conservatives would be ‘done for’.

When the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1969, most young people left school at 15, myself included, and by their 18th birthday would have had three years working in the real world and would have acquired life experiences on which to base any political decisions. Today most now leave at 18 with no life experiences and because of this, the voting age should be increased back to 21 not lowered to 16.

Most young people will vote for a political party like they would support a football team to win. So, these youngsters might be able to vote, but would still be politically ignorant. 

Many years ago, you went to work at a young age, but by the time you were old enough to vote, at least you had real-life experiences. Today, youngsters have to stay in education or training until they’re 18 years old, but when they leave they still have naivety and unworldliness so should not be allowed to vote until they have some life experiences.

I also suspect that many young voters would be swayed by a single issue such as university fees, rather than taking in the wider problems affecting the country, and lowering the voting age will do nothing to ensure the right balance of policies.

A Model Reveals An Appallingly Inappropriate Question A Nurse Asked Her 10-Year-Old 

A model disclosed the egregiously improper questions she claimed a nurse posed to her 10-year-old daughter following her hospitalisation for a feline bite.

Robin O’Malley, a model and radio show co-host, shared the bizarre interaction that occurred after the nurses asked her to leave the room to ask her daughter questions. The mother did not reveal the name of the hospital where the incident occurred.

During a recent episode of The Outlaws Radio Show, O’Malley sat down with her other fellow co-hosts and said that the topic of the conversation is ‘very triggering,’ especially for parents.

O’Malley began the account with hesitation, revealing that staff at the hospital that must remain nameless had questioned her daughter about her sexual activity and whether or not she had ever used alcohol or smoked.

‘I’ve worked so hard to protect her, just for these nurses to ruin her innocence in a split second when all we did was go to the hospital for a cat bite,’ O’Malley said. 

‘I’m not gonna state what hospital,’ the mother said, adding that her daughter was admitted into the paediatric wing.

She then went over the ‘normal questions’ that nurses and doctors ask patients, including if they feel like harming themselves or if they feel safe at home. 

‘And so, these nurses asked me to leave the room for a moment so they could ask my daughter some questions.’ 

‘I was thinking that they were going to ask those very questions I just listed, and those were not, in fact, the questions that they asked her,’ O’Malley said. 

The model said that her daughter is still an ‘innocent,’ ‘normal child,’ who ‘doesn’t try to act older than her age.’ 

O’Malley said: ‘So these nurses asked my 10-year-old daughter if she was having sex and does she drink and smoke?’

After questioning her child, O’Malley said that one of the nurses came out of the room and told her that she ‘may have opened up a can of worms.’ 

‘And I’m like, “What do you mean?’ 

‘And she said, “Uh, I asked her if she’s having sex and she was very confused on what I asked her so now she’s kind of curious”,’ O’Malley recalled. 

The mother then went into the room, where she was ‘immediately’ greeted by her daughter, who asked: ‘Mommy, what’s sex?’ 

‘Oh, okay. So now, I am very livid. I’m very, very, very upset because my innocent 10-year-old child, who I fought so hard to protect her innocence from this already crazy world, just for these nurses to ruin her innocence in a split second when all we did was go to the hospital for a cat bite,’ O’Malley explained.

‘Wow,’ one of her co-hosts responded. 

She then detailed how the questions the nurses asked didn’t sit well with her. 

‘I find that to be an issue because it’s not that they were asking her that because they felt something was wrong,’ O’Malley said.

‘They asked her that because now, apparently, this is a new thing that hospitals ask children starting from the age of seven.’ 

‘And they do not communicate that with the parent beforehand.’ 

After a brief moment of silence, her co-host, Darvio ‘Kingpen’ Morrow, said: ‘Yeah, that’s outrageous. That’s absolutely outrageous.’ 

‘The fact that they thought it was a good idea to do this, and the fact that they did, the most important thing is not only did they do this with a 10-year-old, but they did it without telling you first,’ he added.

‘Because you could have told them, “Aye, don’t do that”,’ Morrow said. 

‘Right,’ O’Malley replied.

 ‘And the fact that they did that without your consent—- that’s wild.’ 

O’Malley said that she was left ‘absolutely fuming’ and ‘distraught’ over the interaction. 

‘I’m pretty sure smoke was coming out of my ears, like, I was heated,’ she said. 

The radio co-host said that she didn’t see the nurse again after she asked her daughter those questions. 

Morrow then said that the entire situation would have been different if O’Malley’s daughter was at the hospital for something that had to do with that ‘region.’ 

‘Like, it was a cat bite,’ said, aid laughing before he added: ‘What are we doing?’ 

The frustrated mother said that following the awkward exchange, she told her friend who works at that hospital. 

‘She was like, “Unfortunately, they make us ask that question now, starting from the age of seven years old”,’ O’Malley said. 

‘And I was like, that is so f’d up.’

 ‘That nurse destroyed that innocent part of her,’ she added. 

The moral of this story is, to never leave your child alone during a visit to the hospital or the doctors. Never leave your child alone with any adult or authority figures, and you should find it highly suspicious if anybody asks to be alone with your child.

To be honest, I wouldn’t have left the room because there would be no way my 10-year-old was going to be alone in a room with anyone.

This woman states that she’s tried to protect her daughter’s innocence, so does that mean that she’s never had a conversation with her daughter about what to do if someone were to touch her inappropriately? Is this keeping her daughter from being aware of what can happen in the world, and sometimes children of sexual abuse have trouble describing what happened to them because they don’t even know the anatomical terms of use.

She has to identify the hospital if this is indeed what happened. In addition, is this lady really under the impression that her 10-year-old child has never heard the term “sex”? It’s very common these days!

This mother ought to have protested the instant the nurse requested her to leave the room. The state does not raise children; families do.

It is impossible to keep your child innocent forever, and if you don’t teach them about their bodies and sex, older kids will, and they will take advantage of their ignorance. Additionally, children who don’t understand what sex is can’t establish appropriate boundaries.

Parents, talk to your children before you even think they need to hear it or someone else will!

The Knickers Of Librarian Sharon Mawdsley Were Paraded In Prison

A married prison librarian whose underpants were paraded around a jail wing ‘like a trophy’ after a sexual relationship with an inmate has been spared jail.

Mum-of-two Sharon Mawdsley, 47, from Blackpool, shared steamy text messages and had sex with Steven Morrell in the library office at HMP Kirkham.

Their two-week affair came to an end after staff member Sarah Fleming heard whispers among prison inmates and reported her concerns.

Mawdsley’s underwear was allegedly shown to other inmates at Kirkham prison as over 20 prisoners stood outside their cell doors before lock up, a jury was told.

A former prisoner who claimed to have seen this also claimed that Mawdsley had molested him sexually.

He told a court: ‘He [Morrell] took her underwear and when everyone was standing at the doors one evening, he showed them like a trophy.

‘There were over 20 prisoners who saw it.’

Mawdsley was informed on July 6, 2018, that she should not go back to work, and Morrell was sent to a different jail.

After his cell was searched, a secret iPhone was found hidden in a laundry bag, along with a piece of paper with Mawdsley’s personal phone number scrawled on it.

Three days later, she admitted giving Morrell her phone number and engaging in ‘unlawful conversations and text messages’.

She was aware that he had a phone, but she chose not to alert the jail staff.

Mawdsley pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office in connection with the phone contact with Morrell in January 2024.

However, she only acknowledged having sex with Morrell when questioned about claims that she had sexually assaulted two other prisoners in the library.

The prosecutor, Wayne Jackson, stated that Mawdsley worked ten hours a week at HMP Kirkham.

She had been screened for the position and trained in anti-corruption measures.

Alli Black, the Governor of HMP Kirkham, said: ‘Where an inappropriate relationship develops, the authority of that staff member and other members of staff is diminished.’

If professional boundaries were not respected, she added, staff members may be coerced into smuggling narcotics or cell phones into jail.

Anthony Parkinson, defending, said Mawdsley has ‘an impeccable past history – apart from these two weeks of madness in the Summer of 2018’.

In addition, he emphasised that the defendant had experienced a protracted delay and public humiliation as a result of media attention.

Although Mawdsley and her spouse are no longer together, he nonetheless supported his ex-wife in a letter to the court.

Two other prisoners claimed the librarian had abused them in the library following the inquiry.

The mother of two was exonerated of all additional counts after the trial in April.

During that trial, she confessed to having sex with Morrell.

She returned to Preston Crown Court to face a sentence for a single count of misconduct in a public office.

Given the behaviour of people in authority, it’s no surprise that jails are becoming less like prisons and more like retirement communities for illegal behaviour.

Today’s prisons serve as hubs for gang recruitment, criminal training, and networking, and the majority of state-employed law enforcement personnel are either untrustworthy or poorly trained.

A pair of elephantine pants would not pique most men’s interest, but it takes all kinds, and why does a prison need a librarian? Surely a half-educated inmate could arrange books.

This kind of activity is unacceptable, and prisoners would thrive on it as it relieves boredom; therefore, the woman was fortunate to be released.

The sad thing is that these women believe that male prisoners love them, but they need to realise that they’re just being used for sex and whatever else they can get from them, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the prisoners in question now sue for PTSD.

This prisoner who pumped this lady should be released immediately; he’s been punished enough! After all, she is a hefty lady and there would never be a shovel to fill that hole.

These men are behind bars for a reason, because they’ve done wrong, and now so has she. This was an offence, and this woman should have faced jail like others do.

Stones Pelt Jewish Boy, 16, In Shocking Scene

CCTV caught the shocking moment that a teenage Jewish boy was ‘pelted with stones’ walking to the synagogue in an attack in broad daylight in north London.

The attack on the youngster, who is thought to be 16 years old, on Saturday, May 11 at around 5:55 p.m. on Rookwood Road in Hackney is being investigated as a hate crime by the Met.

Three males were chasing the youngster in the London neighbourhood of Stamford Hill while he was wearing traditional Jewish attire, and one of them was hurling stones at him.

The largest Hasidic Jewish community in Europe is in the North London area, which has traditionally been the target of anti-Semitic attacks; however, these seem to have gotten worse since the terror strikes on Israel on October 7.

Suspected hate crimes reported to police in recent months include thugs on bikes randomly assaulting pedestrians in traditional Jewish dress, a man walking down a street threatening to ‘kill’ Jews and an alleged robbery that saw a 20-year-old woman beaten unconscious.

The victim in the footage is reportedly ‘alright’ following the attack, as he has gotten used to antisemitism in the area, the JC reports.

The Metropolitan Police said: ‘An investigation is underway after a reported assault of a male in Rookwood Road, N16.

‘At around 17:55 hrs on Saturday, 11 May, the victim—a Jewish male—was walking on Rookwood Road, N16 when he was approached by another male and allegedly had an item thrown at him.

‘The incident was reported to police the next day and an investigation was launched by officers based in Hackney. At this stage, the incident is being treated as a hate crime.

‘We are aware of a video being shared online and this will form part of our enquiries. We are in contact with the Shomrim and our enquiries are ongoing.

‘No arrests have been made at this time.

‘Anyone with information should call 101, giving the reference CAD 8409/23MAY. Information can also be provided anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.’

Chief of Shomrim, a neighbourhood watch, Chaim Hochhauser, told the source that the victim was attacked on Shabbat while walking to the synagogue.

He said the perpetrators have caused ‘quite a lot of trouble’ since the October 7 attacks, in attempts to ‘frighten and harm the Jewish community’.

Although the police are looking into the alleged attack, no one has been taken into custody as of yet.

Everyone in this country should be able to walk our streets safely. It shouldn’t matter what age, sex, race or religion they are. We are all equals like it or not.

The idea that attacking a child is justified because of what adults from different religions are doing to each other is absurd.

Taking into account the events of World War II, this is tragic. You were astounded by the inhumanity against fellow humans, and it still doesn’t cease, but this is what’s happening to our once amazing country. I used to be proud to say that I was British, sadly, not so much now.

Britishness is a thing of the past. Because we let them take over and seek to replace our culture with theirs. British people in the UK are currently a minority, and what are our police doing about this, let me guess, the usual investigations that are ongoing, which is probably a code for the case is open but we’re doing absolutely nothing about it.

There are far too many migrants in the UK now, and we can’t keep up with them all, not to mention the lack of powers by the police in dealing with minors. We would need to triple the police force throughout the UK and even then that would barely scratch the surface.

A 70-Year-Old Grandmother Chased Yobs After They Broke And Destroyed Her Gate

A grandmother who chased a gang of yobs after they smashed her garden gate claims she was told off by police after telling them she would ‘wring their necks’ if she saw the teens again. 

Gillian Mears, 70, said she ‘just saw red’ after the group damaged her back gate at her house in Kessingland, Suffolk.

Following the incident, Mrs Mears, who has four grandkids, pursued the yobs with assistance from her neighbours.

She reported the damage, but when the police came to her house, she was reprimanded for her threats.

She said, ‘I just saw red and lost the plot in a fit of rage and took to chasing the gang of youths down the street.

‘Our neighbours came out of their houses to try and help me catch them, which was really nice.

‘I called the police and only when I told them that if I got my hands on them, I would wring their necks did they rock up.

‘When they arrived, they told me off for making that threat, which was not a threat; it was me just venting my anger.’

After the attack on April 20, Mrs. Mears and her husband John had to pay a hefty amount of money to have the gate fixed, just to have the vandals come again.

When they came back, Mr Mears, who is disabled, went to confront the gang but fell over and hurt himself.

Mrs Mears then picked her husband up off the floor and called the police.

The couple claimed that the gate was broken by vandals once more and that they had to pay £520 to have it restored.

The couple also added that they are ‘living in fear’ that the group will return.

Mrs Mears said: ‘Those evil kids just laughing at me and my husband make me feel sick and full of despair with the next generation. I have no hope, and their parents should be ashamed.

‘My husband, who is not very mobile in his old age, had a nasty fall attempting to confront them.

‘I had to pick him off the floor and it was very distressing. Then, to add to the misery, we saw the damage to our gate, which had been completely smashed in.’

A Suffolk Police spokesman said: ‘The investigation is ongoing into the criminal damage and anti-social behaviour by a group of youths on April 20.’

For further information, MailOnline has been in touch with Suffolk Police.

It’s no surprise that some people do what they want to do without any consideration for others when the police certainly seem to condone their behaviour whilst condemning those who try to stop it. The police need to get their priorities right and start doing the job they used to.

This lady doubtless said what she said metaphorically, but the police took it literally. How on earth would a 70-year-old lady ‘wring their necks’, even though she probably wanted to, would not have had the strength to do so?

This saying is as old as the hills. My mother used to say it to me as a child, but wouldn’t have done it!

It was misconstrued by the police, who clearly have a literacy problem.

Instead of serving and defending people who are defending their rights by defending their property, the police have shifted more in favour of those who engage in criminal activity. This raises the question of whether we have a police force at all.

London’s Pro-Palestinian Marches Are ‘Genuinely Dangerous’ For Jews, Says Michael Gove

It is ‘genuinely dangerous to be Jewish’ near Gaza marches in London and other cities today, Michael Gove warned as he accused pro-Palestinian protesters of turning a blind eye to ‘lurid demonstrations of anti-Semitism’.

In a major speech at a Jewish community centre today, the Communities Secretary raised the spectre of Nazi Germany, warning that attacks on Jews were often ‘the canary in the mine’ for the state of a nation.

Mr Gove urged the pro-Palestine march organisers and “good people taking part” to take further action to prevent anti-Jewish hate symbols from being shown by certain participants in the marches.

He said Jews were unable to be ‘their authentic selves’ near the marches and while many protesters are ‘thoughtful, gentle, compassionate people’, they are ‘side by side with those who are promoting hate’.

In recent weeks, one man has been arrested for carrying a placard emblazoned with a swastika, while police sparked outrage by telling a Jewish woman that the notorious Nazi symbol was ‘not necessarily anti-Semitic’.

Mr Gove further attacked demonstrations on college campuses, questioning if comparable demonstrations against China, Syria, or Burma’s violations of human rights had not taken place. He brought up the fact that Syrian tyrant Bashar al-Assad was the only person to have killed more Muslims in the recent past.

The Cabinet minister described anti-Semitism as the ‘common currency of hate’ that is shared by the Far Right, the Hard Left, and Islamists and attacked the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement as ‘explicitly anti-Semitic’. 

Mr Gove’s speech came ahead of the publication of a long-trailed report by the government’s independent adviser on political violence, Lord Walney.

Lord Walney accused authorities of being ‘insufficiently robust’ with groups on the left.

In a long-awaited report today, he said groups like Just Stop Oil, who make lawbreaking a central part of their modus operandi, should face serious curbs on their fundraising and be liable to legal action from disrupted businesses.

He also proposed changing the legislation to make it simpler for police to deny permission for large-scale gatherings, with an eye towards pro-Palestine demonstrations. The groups could also be made to pay a portion of the costs associated with upholding the legislation.

He also recommended that governments look at outlawing rallies outside the Houses of Parliament in the heart of London to protect MPs from harassment, which may be the most contentious aspect of the report.

Based on the visas granted, our government is bringing in 1.2 million illegal immigrants annually. Since Brexit, there has been no improvement, and the British people are now a minority.

It is time to outlaw all forms of public protest. We can protest all we want thanks to social media, and here’s Michael Gove along with his buddies who turn a blind eye to the consequences of mass migration.

Thousands of people enter the country illegally every year, yet this is legal migration, approved by our government. Rishi Sunak could halt this influx tomorrow, but he won’t since voting and cheap work are two benefits that illegal immigrants provide, and the anti-semitic, fascist, hate-filled rhetoric that’s spewing out of the mouths of these protesters is truly sickening and terrifying, and frighteningly reminiscent of Germany in the 1930s.

The UK is becoming a Muslim country and we are becoming like Germany—never again, which means never again.

London has become a no-go zone for decent people when these hate marches take place, and they’re costing the taxpayer millions and millions of pounds to police and clean up after them.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started