Pet Peacock Killed By Slingshots And Catapults—Owner Notified, ‘You’re Next’

Yobs killed a family’s beloved pet peacock by shooting it more than 20 times with slingshots and catapults, before contacting the owners to warn them, ‘you’re going to be next’.

A family was left in tears after watching River, their peacock, which they rescued from his abusive previous owners, be brutally killed by the sadistic group on CCTV footage.

River’s owner, Alison Carter, 57, posted the footage from a neighbour’s CCTV camera of the suspects on Facebook, showing five boys and one girl firing at the peacock, who was perched in a tree. 

One member of the twisted group messaged her daughter Macey, 23, threatening: ‘Your peacock is 6 feet under and you are going to be next’.

In the sickening footage, three of the boys are seen pelting River more than 20 times from the road before climbing over the fence onto the roof of a private property to carry on their assault on the innocent bird.

A petrified and injured River, who Alison says would have ‘trusted’ the group of strangers, is seen falling out of the tree, flapping around in distress and cowering in a corner.

The group keeps shooting at him from the rooftop. Suddenly, two of them run forward, seize River by the wings and present him like a prize. Afterwards, one of them tears off his feathers.

They attempted to conceal his bloody corpse behind some wood in the corner before running away like cowards.

Alison, 57, said, ‘I was devastated, and I still am. He was part of the family; he played and walked around with our dog, Ziggy.

‘He was like a dog—he would follow you around, he would come into the kitchen, he would have trusted them.’

River was found “featherless and frightened” in a little cage without sunshine when they found him about six years ago.

Alison said: ‘We built up the trust and he became tame, friendly and happy for his freedom.’

After posting a screen grab of the security camera footage on Facebook, they notified the authorities and provided the perpetrators’ identities.

Her daughter Macey, who was sent the threat from one of the group members, said: ‘We now don’t feel safe.’

Fearing that the miscreants may return, they have put a halt to their five other peacocks’ freedom to wander.

According to Alison, one of her dogs was hit by a catapult the day after River was murdered, leaving a bloody wound.

This is disgusting behaviour from a human being. It’s not just disgusting, it’s barbaric—we haven’t moved on very much from the days of being hung, drawn and quartered!

How long will it take for parents to accept accountability for their kids? To instruct children on appropriate conduct, inappropriate behaviour, and the reasons behind both. It’s no good blaming schools or society if a parent hasn’t taught their child how to behave, how to treat other people and their property, and that there will be consequences for wrongdoing.

It is the duty of those who choose to become parents to ensure that their offspring learn how to be law-abiding citizens; otherwise, this type of conduct will only continue, as we are currently witnessing.

Unfortunately, you can’t reason with those who have a mindset of immoral ways.

In our culture, we will have more socially inept youngsters who will grow up to be adults with far more serious problems, like murder, if we tolerate violence and brutality towards other living things.

The issue is that, as it has been for some time, punishment is now too light. When I was younger, my mother would yell at me for doing anything remotely wrong. However, these days, parents are afraid to discipline their kids for fear that social services will be called and the kids will be taken away. As a result, these kids don’t have strict rules, and they know that they can get away with anything they want to do because all they have to say is, “I’ll call social services or the police and have you nicked.”

Jeez, the police and social services were on rapid dial! It worked for me since my kids didn’t know it was a deadline and thought I was talking to them on the phone. However, some kids, wouldn’t care and would instead require more severe punishment, such as a smack or even the cane. 

Return the cane to the classrooms. I had a pretty good hiding at home if I even looked at my mother strangely, and many other kids got canings or even had the blackboard rubber hurled across the classroom if a student was misbehaving. I was a decent citizen, kind, and respectful, and I performed well in society, so it never caused me any damage.

We now live in a ‘woke’ society where ‘you can’t say this, you can’t do that. You mustn’t do anything that will hurt your fellow human being’, but guess what? We already have!

We have been socially conditioned to believe that these things are bad, and now we have introduced the ‘woke brigade’, and hell’s bells, we are even erasing our history, and we shouldn’t be ‘woke’ we should be ‘awake’, but instead we have been mesmerised and triggered into believing that we shouldn’t do certain things, or say certain things.

It’s all mind control, folks! Induction of P syco-neuroses by Conditional Reflex under Stress. Even commercials that you watch on TV are mind conditioning; it’s just that people don’t realise it, but you are being manipulated. Their marketing and advertising are subtle, but once they get their hooks in, these commercials and other forms of mind control can reach people on an unconscious level.

M&S Charges £6 For ‘Posh’ Egg And Cress Sandwich, Which Has 51g More Filling Than Its £2.65 Standard Version

Customers have blasted Marks and Spencer for charging £6 for a ‘posh’ egg and cress sandwich that is only 51 grammes more full than its more ordinary counterpart.

A standard egg and watercress sandwich from the supermarket chain will cost you £2.65, while the “posh” version will cost you more than twice as much.

According to the description, the £6 snack consists of a whole sliced egg covered in mayonnaise and salad cream and garnished with watercress and a dash of pepper.

Encased by two slices of nine-grain bread, the ‘posh’ has 166g of filling, compared to the 115g inside the standard version. 

Many, however, are left wondering why the sandwich is so expensive and what makes it so fancy.

Consumer guru Jane Hawkes said: ‘Pushing up prices to cover costs is one thing, but taking the proverbial is another.

‘Cost-conscious customers could well decide they are happy with their favourite budget lunchbox filling—at a quarter of the price.’

Others on social media were left enraged after a picture of the £6 sandwich was posted to X, with the caption: ‘This country is finished.’

One curious customer asked: ‘Where’s the un-posh one, and is it cheaper?’ 

A second fumed: ‘Fun fact: The word posh here actually costs you an extra 3 quid!’

‘Add the word posh and you can charge what you like,’ a third jibbed.

Another chimed in: ‘£6 quid, wt*—that’s ridiculous.’

‘There’s nothing posh about egg,’ wrote one baffled user, while another exclaimed: ‘£6 for an egg sandwich! world has gone mad.’ 

The ‘posh’ egg mayo sandwich was released as part of the retailer’s deep-filled range earlier in 2024.

New additions to the café menu included a £5.50 prawn and mayo sandwich and a £6 smoked salmon and cream cheese option.

Marks & Spencer also introduced a ‘Rainbow Veg’ and avocado and a £5.25 gluten-free sandwich.

An M&S spokesperson said: ‘Our deep-filled Egg Mayo & Watercress sandwich in our M&S Café has over 150g of filling, which includes luxurious egg mayonnaise combined with salad cream and chives for a richer flavour. 

‘Paired with an extra layer of chunky slices of free-range egg, fresh baby watercress, and rocket leaves, the filling sits in between thick slices of soft 9-grain bread.

‘This indulgent lunchtime option is proving to be a real customer favourite that can be enjoyed in our cafés or on the go’. 

This comes shortly after a group of self-styled ‘Robin Hoods’ bragged on social media about stealing from Marks & Spencer to give products to food banks.

The cafés in Marks & Spencer can be somewhat expensive, but you don’t have to shop there if you don’t want to; you can go someplace else that isn’t as expensive. Places like Tesco, ASDA, and Sainsbury’s are for the peasants, while places like Marks & Spencer, Waitrose, and stores like these are for the elite, as my son would say.

I must admit that Marks & Spencer’s sandwiches are pretty tasty, but six pounds for a sarnie is pretty pricey. To be fair, you could make your own sandwiches at home for less money, but let’s be honest: who would be that desperate for an egg and cress sarnie?

What in the world are these sandwiches made of—possibly the best bread, butter, and golden-egg-laying chickens?

If people didn’t buy their food, then they wouldn’t be able to sell it, and their prices would have to come down, but sadly, there are people who will buy their food—some people have more money than sense.

A British Sitcom From The 80s Called Terry And June Is The Latest Series To Be Tagged With Trigger Warnings After Fawlty Towers, Only Fools And Horses, And ‘Allo ‘Allo

Classic 80s sitcom Terry and June has become the latest TV show to be hit with a trigger warning for ‘discriminatory language’ after Fawlty Towers, Only Fools and Horses and ‘Allo ‘Allo also fell foul of snowflakes. 

Nine series of the wildly successful programme aired on BBC1 between 1979 and 1987.

Terry Scott and Dame June Whitfield played Purley-based middle-aged, middle-class suburban couple Terry and June Medford.

Seven other authors contributed a few episodes, but John Kane wrote the majority of the 65 episodes.

ITV has now alerted viewers of the early evening classic’s “discriminatory language of the period” on its streaming service.

It follows similar warnings imposed on other classic British TV shows, including Only Fools And Horses, which had five episodes flagged in 2021 for ‘offensive racial language’.

They added in a statement on Tuesday: ‘Programming that contains potentially sensitive language has carried appropriate warnings since our launch. We regularly re-examine historical programming in order to review, re-label, provide context and ensure the right guidance is in place.’

ITV did not comment on the specific language used but a fan claimed on Twitter: ‘There’s an episode where Terry is at a work conference and puts June’s perfume on by mistake.

‘The entire episode is about how his boss hates gays and how Terry is terrified about being thought of as one. Cue every 70s homophobic comedy trope.’

Other classic shows such as ‘Allo ‘All, One Foot in the Grave and Fawlty Towers have been hit with similar trigger warnings.

Another warning over ‘offensive racial imagery’ appeared on an episode of 1970s comedy The Good Life.

In the comedy, Su Pollard played Peggy Ollerenshaw, the kooky maid who aspired to be a Yellowcoat and tried to get involved in the camp’s entertainment in any way she could.

Although the actress, who is currently 71 years old, gained notoriety for her outrageous fashion sense in real life, her character was recognised for her big glasses and frizzy hair from the 1980s.

Elsewhere in the show, RADA-trained actress Ruth Madoc received a BAFTA for playing Gladys Pugh, the Chief Yellowcoat, with the catchphrase, ‘Morning campers!’

Gladys nurtured an unrequited passion for Simon Cadell’s Jeffrey Fairbrother and describes theirs as a ‘great comedy partnership’.

Barry Howard played champion ballroom dancer Barry Stuart-Hargreaves, who died from cancer in 2016 at 78.

I enjoy having access to a growing selection of 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s TV episodes on demand, but I find it annoying when the opening commercials for these shows include the required warnings. Everything in the world they depicted was perfect. Man up, people; today’s culture is always willing to take offence.

These Gen Zers don’t know if they’re men, women, or lamppost. Actually, lamposts are useful; at least my dog seems to think so, and most people these days don’t know if they’re Martha or Arthur. They should watch ‘Love Thy Neighbour’, they would have a fit!

It was a much better world back then. Simpler and more innocent. You knew how to address people and what sex they were. Children generally had two married heterosexual parents, one of each, and people knew and accepted their roles in life, which fit together like a glove. It might not have been politically correct, but it was, without a doubt, far better than negotiating the minefield of today’s society.

Today’s BBC comedy shows should all include a disclaimer stating that they are unlikely to make viewers laugh.

Increase In Shoplifting Offences

Shoplifting has risen to the highest level on record amid complaints the crime has been effectively ‘decriminalised’, new data revealed today. 

In the year ending in December 2023, police registered 430,104 offences, up over 37% from 315,040 in the year prior.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) states that the number is the highest since current records started in the year before March 2003.

Retail bosses have accused ministers of allowing shoplifting to become effectively decriminalised, with many police forces failing to attend the majority of reports and failing to gather any evidence when they do.

Under 40 per cent of shoplifting reports were attended by the Met between April 2022 and April 2023, recent figures revealed. 

Other data points to a comparable, although frequently worse, scenario across the rest of the nation, with police only responding to one out of every five shoplifting-related complaints.

Out of all the forces, just six answered the Telegraph’s request for freedom of information.

Today Rishi Sunak’s spokesman said the increase in shoplifting was ‘clearly unacceptable’.

He told reporters: ‘We have seen the figures this morning and reiterate the Government is fully focused on keeping our streets safe, cutting crimes and protecting the public and this is why we’ve put more police into our communities, invested heavily in safer streets and we’ve handed out tougher sentences to the worst offenders.

‘I’d point out that in today’s statistics, we see crime is down 20% since 2019. Since 2010, violent crime is down 44% and neighbourhood crime is down 48%.

‘In relation to shoplifting specifically, shoplifting is clearly unacceptable and the Prime Minister has previously talked about it being a blight on our communities, the damage it causes to our businesses, and we’re absolutely clear that we should take a zero-tolerance approach to this crime.

‘Thanks to dedicated police officers patrolling badly-affected areas and attending more crime scenes, and retailers working closely with the police to share information such as CCTV recordings, in the last year charges were up by 46%, but we recognise there’s more to do to protect retail workers and tackle repeat offenders, which is why earlier in the month, the Prime Minister announced a new retail crime action plan.’

The spokesman added that it was the Government’s understanding an increase in shoplifting was being driven by ‘organised criminality’.

Police recorded crime data for England and Wales shows offences involving theft from the person stood at 125,563 in 2023, up nearly a fifth from 106,606 in 2022, and is the highest level since 2004 (137,154).

Robberies were up 13% year over year to 81,094 from 71,983 in 2022; nevertheless, this is still 26% fewer than the total for the year that ended in March 2003 (110,271).

Knife and sharp weapon offences increased to 49,489 in 2023 from 46,153 in 2022, a 7% increase, but a 3% decrease from the pre-pandemic total of 51,206 offences in the year ending in March 2020. Gun crime increased by 9%.

Due to issues with data recording, the offences reported by Devon & Cornwall Police and Greater Manchester Police are not included in this set of numbers.

The prisons are full, the cops have been cut to the bone, and they are busy covering up for themselves. We have the highest tax burden in living memory and nothing to show for it. The cost of living has gone through the roof, our public services and infrastructure are crumbling, and the Tories who preside over it all are living proof that crime pays—no wonder people are shoplifting!

Disused Bus Stop Turned Into Temporary Home Exposes Housing Crisis 

A group of homeless individuals converted an abandoned bus stop into a makeshift home, exposing Britain’s housing problem.

Seven months ago, Destiny Mitchell, 26, moved into a 9.8-by-3.2-foot glass and metal shelter in Selly Oak, Birmingham, with her mother, 44, and boyfriend, 31-year-old Ryan.

The trio has added cupboards, chairs, carpet, bins, bedding, and Super Mario Bros-themed makeshift curtains.

But shopkeepers who are paying thousands of pounds in business rates and locals said the shelter was attracting ‘anti-social behaviour’ from large crowds of people gathering late at night.

It comes as Birmingham is caught in the grip of a housing crisis, with more than 23,000 households waiting for a property. This figure includes nearly 5,000 people who are living in temporary accommodation. 

The council previously warned its waiting list for social housing could be closed to new applicants because of a backlog. 

Nationally, around 1.3 million households across England are waiting for a property. Meanwhile, 109,000 households in England, including 142,000 children, were in emergency housing between June and September last year. 

Additionally, according to government statistics, 3,898 people slept on the streets in 2023—a 27 percent yearly increase and the highest number since 2015.

The highest number of rough sleepers in 2023 were in Westminster (277) and Camden (121), and the biggest year-on-year increases were in Kingston upon Hull (290 percent), Ealing (121 percent), Redbridge (89 percent), and Leeds (32 percent).

A council leader explained to MailOnline how the problem was putting additional strain on local government.

Seán D T Woodward, of Fareham Borough Council in Hampshire, said: ‘There is a huge and increasing cost on all councils who are housing authorities to accommodate those at risk of homelessness.

‘In Fareham a few years ago, that cost was around £100,000 annually. It has now risen to £2,000,000 as various factors bite, including the cost of mortgages and rent, especially in the south-east. 

‘In Fareham, nobody needs to sleep on the street, and when any homeless people engage with the Council via Fareham StreetAid, there is always room for them. 

Destiny stated that although the municipality in Birmingham has offered to give temporary housing, she does not want to be apart from her mother, who has autism.

The 26-year-old added, ‘When we found this place, it was my idea to create this living space.

‘Before I lived in a bus stop, I was sleeping in a blanket on the floor, but I didn’t feel safe.

For anyone, living in a bus shelter is hardly the ideal circumstance. It results in disorder and disturbance, drinking, drug usage, and fighting and yelling at one another at all hours of the day and night.

The housing problem can be resolved in certain ways. Restart the construction of prefabricated homes or construct them using shipping containers. These should be constructed by councils using money from the sale of council houses. Make land banks’ holdings of developers constructed, or else they risk losing them. Divide the large home-building conglomerates into smaller businesses. Prohibit foreign investors from storing their funds offshore. Put an end to immigration altogether. Return the 1.5 million people who have no right to be here. Assess a high tax rate on the 1.5 million second homes and impose fines on authorities for houses that remain unoccupied for extended periods.

We currently have an excessively large and unsustainable population due to the majority of the newcomers to our country being a burden on the state and economy, but all these sensible measures seem to elude our political parties.

A Judge Rules Marshmallows Are Not Sweets After Finding The Treats Can Be Roasted And Eaten Off A Stick And Are Therefore VAT Exempt

A judge’s decision that marshmallows are not sweets because they may be roasted and consumed off of a stick has resulted in a confectionery company winning a significant tax dispute. 

It means one of Britain’s top confectionary firms, Innovative Bites Ltd., can dodge a £470,000 value-added tax bill.

The firm that imports American ‘sweets and treats’ including Twinkies and Reeses into the UK has successfully battled HMRC in a six-figure fight against paying tax on its Baking Buddy Mega Marshmallows.

The company is part of the Leicestershire-based World of Sweets group, which also owns cornershop bagged sweets line Bobby’s and the traditional confectionary brand Bond’s of London.

It beat the taxman in a tribunal in 2022 over a demand for a £472,928 VAT payment, successfully arguing that the giant marshmallows should be zero VAT rated because they are ‘ingredients’ for cooking on a barbecue, rather than sweets.

HMRC was not satisfied with that decision, however, and went on to challenge the ruling in the Upper Tribunal, arguing that the giant marshmallows are still ‘confectionery’ and liable for tax even if they are normally cooked because they are a sweet treat ‘eaten with the fingers’.

However, judges have now ruled in favour of the marshmallow importers a second time, maintaining the decision that the confections are free from taxes as they are frequently consumed roasted off a stick and more packets are sold during the summer grilling season.

Judge Phyllis Ramshaw said: ‘Confectionery is not generally used in cooking, or itself subject to cooking, in order to be enjoyed as intended.’

The Upper Tribunal heard that after being handed a massive tax bill for the period June 2015 to June 2019, the Loughborough-based firm went to a tax tribunal to argue the large marshmallows were in fact ‘ingredients,’ sometimes used for s’mores, an American treat where roasted marshmallows are sandwiched between chocolate biscuits.

Confectionery is subject to VAT, however, goods used for cooking, such as cooking chocolate, may qualify for a zero-rated tax.

The firm’s lawyers said Mega Marshmallows were 5cm in height, compared to 2.5cm for regular marshmallows and intended for roasting rather than eating out of the bag as snacks.

HMRC lawyers argued the Mega Marshmallows could still be eaten ‘on the go’ like a bag of sweets, so should incur VAT.

Mar Bars can also be deep-fried and eaten; therefore, they should be VAT-exempt as well, and Marshmallows are common at BBQs.

Since we already pay taxes on everything we purchase, everything we buy really shouldn’t be subject to further taxes, but our government wants to do so out of sheer avarice.

VAT has not disappeared and never will, so what is our government doing with all of the money that has been pilfered?

Isn’t it great to see the tax man getting beaten, especially when we see the way the governments of today waste our money once they get their hands on it, although I’m not suggesting any criminal acts here.)

The Moment Albanian People Traffickers Used WhatsApp To Organise 31 Small Boat Crossings For Migrants, Including Children

This is the moment a ‘prolific’ Albanian people trafficker, who used WhatsApp to organise 31 small boat crossings for migrants, including young children, is arrested.

Mustaf Cunaj was given a nine-year prison sentence for his role in the smuggling of migrants on inflatable boats for thousands of pounds each.

The 41-year-old was part of a trafficking network that brought almost 10,000 illegal immigrants into the United Kingdom.

Recently, surveillance footage of the smuggler’s arrest has surfaced, showing Cunaj being approached by nighttime plainclothes police.

The trafficker, wearing an orange hoodie, then speaks to the officers, who tell him that he ‘conspired to facilitate an immigration breach’.

The pair of officers then take Cunaj along the pavement, each holding one of his arms, before putting him into a black vehicle which is waiting down the road.

The trafficker’s phone was found after his arrest. Two videos that were saved on the device showed migrants wearing life jackets aboard a boat at sea and a boat being launched from a beach.

Several images sharing map locations in Calais and Dunkirk were also discovered on his phone, with one showing two users’ locations in the Channel and the North Sea.

Cunaj, who used the alias ‘John Brown’ in WhatsApp conversations with migrants and smugglers, arranged the crossings for five weeks between July and August 2022.

In one conversation with another smuggler, he arranged a crossing for a woman and two children, aged five and nine, for £7,500 each.

In another message, Cunaj talked about buying inflatable boats for between £4,000 and £4,500 per boat.

He also asked about lifejackets, telling his contact, ‘I have five people, they don’t know how [to wear a lifejacket] as they are small children’.

Cunaj was detained once previously in October 2022, released under investigation, and then arrested once more in September 2023 on suspicion of people-smuggling charges.

In the beginning, the trafficker denied any involvement in immigration crimes, saying he only connected family members with those who could be interested in visiting the UK.

He later admitted conspiring to facilitate illegal immigration at Kingston Crown Court and was jailed for nine years.

Cunaj’s smuggling network was connected to Hewa Rahimpur, a 30-year-old Iranian who managed the circle from his residence in Ilford, east London. Rahimpur sourced vessels in Turkey and sent them to Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

A sentence of nine years isn’t much of a deterrent. How about a minimum of one year for every person they illegally smuggled in and endangered their lives? He will be out of prison in about four and a half years. His money will be waiting for him and he will most likely carry on as before. He should have been sentenced to the full arm of the law, his money taken from him and immediate deportation on release is what should happen, but it won’t because the UK is beyond a joke.

Although his capture is a positive development, there will undoubtedly be successors.

British authorities’ token pre-election activities! And no matter which way this goes, it’s the good old British taxpayer that ends up paying. Enough is enough.

Pay-Per-Mile’ Scheme

Susan Hall blasted ‘untrustworthy’ Sadiq Khan as she doubled down on claims the London mayor is plotting a ‘pay-per-mile’ scheme for the capital’s drivers.

Ahead of next week’s London mayoral election, the Tory candidate said there was ‘no way’ Mr Khan won’t bring in a new road charging policy if he wins a new term.

Before doing so, Ms Hall drew attention to Mr Khan’s prior denials that he would expand the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) to outer London.

But, in a fiery clash on LBC Radio, the Labour mayor insisted pay-per-mile ‘is not happening’ as he slammed his Tory rival for a campaign ‘based on disinformation’.

He also claimed Ms Hall was ‘the most dangerous candidate’ he has ever stood against in his political career, which she described as an ‘outrageous comment’.

If Mr Khan prevails in the London mayoral election on Thursday, May 2, he will take office for a record third term at City Hall.

However, Ms Hall’s allegations that he intends to punish London’s drivers once again after his ULEZ expansion are weighing heavily on him.

The Tory candidate used tonight’s London mayoral debate on LBC to grill Mr Khan over a £21million spend by Transport for London on ‘Project Detroit’.

This has been revealed to be a road charging platform that has ‘the capability to be extended… so that other forms of charging based on distance, vehicle type, etc., could be catered for’.

‘There’s no way he won’t bring in pay-per-mile,’ said Ms Hall, who has pledged to scrap the ULEZ expansion on ‘day one’ of becoming London mayor.

‘He expected us to trust him on the expansion of the ULEZ and that has brought so much hardship, it really has.

‘People trusted him and he let them down. Sixty per cent of people in the consultation said “we don’t want it”.

‘He ignored them, he put it in any way. He will bring in pay-per-mile, the evidence is there.

‘If he really didn’t want to, then they wouldn’t have still had people working on it this year.

‘£21 million of our money has gone into it. Why is he spending £21 million of taxpayers’ money, Londoners’ money, if he’s got no intention of bringing it in?

‘He cannot be trusted and we all know that, he goes back on what he promises.’

Mr Khan said he was ‘quite clear, pay-per-mile is not happening’, as he hit out at his Tory rival for a ‘campaign based on disinformation, misinformation and lies’.

Of course, he will bring it in. He’s spent millions on cameras under the ULEZ framework and another 25 million on pay-per-mile in its own right. He will probably apply it to all vehicles, fossil fuel, including electric cars and hybrids, and still, he will get voted in, why because it’s an election that runs like Pontins.

With his money-grabbing schemes, Sadiq Khan is ruining London, and the violent criminality he condones is bringing this once-great city to an end.

It would be like expecting a vegan dog to abstain from meat consumption to trust Sadiq Khan not to implement pay-per-mile.

Sadiq Khan sees motorists as his main source of revenue, and he will always be coming up with new methods to take advantage of you, and those looking forward to a greener and more eco-friendly London. The air quality never really improved after ULEZ was introduced, but that was never its intention, the intention was to make money off a money-making scheme.

Folks, think twice before you vote, the wrong vote will cost you dearly!

School Head Announces 12-Hour Day To Combat Phone Addiction

A head teacher has announced plans to introduce a 12-hour school day in a bid to reverse a ‘100 percent phone addiction’ among his pupils.

At All Saints Catholic College in Notting Hill, west London, kids are expected to attend at 7 am and remain until 7 pm. Instead of wasting time on electronics at home, they will participate in dodgeball, basketball, painting, theatre, and cooking lessons.

Andrew O’Neill, who masterminded the scheme, said that smartphones were creating an apathetic and anxious generation.

The 42-year-old told The Times that he had found ‘some of the most shocking things I have ever seen’ on confiscated phones, including pupils blackmailing strangers and even catfishing one another, which involves pretending to be someone else online to humiliate another person.

All Saints, which is rated ‘outstanding’, banned its 900 pupils, aged between 11 and 16, from carrying phones in 2016 but allows the devices to be kept in bags or lockers.

Mr O’Neill, who is a former head teacher of the year, said that a number of pupils were falling victim to online crime, including cyberbullying, sexting, and blackmail.

The teacher added that he was also worried about children’s increasing inability to make friends in real life, often choosing to play online games into the early hours of the morning with those in other countries.

He said that his pupils were growing worse at making eye contact and holding conversations. 

‘We have a long-term issue we need to solve,’ Mr O’Neill added. ‘If we don’t, we will have a generational problem with workplaces and society.

‘Some children are so apathetic. They don’t care about anything.

‘They are buried in their phones.’

The father-of-three said his children were only allowed ‘brick’ phones and smartphones, without any social media apps installed, for tracking their location.

Mr O’Neill added that he hoped pupils could experience a childhood like he had growing up in Barton, near Darlington, Durham, where children played outside rather than heading to their bedrooms to spend time on their phones.

The head teacher also said that parents had a responsibility to keep their children safe online and called for those who failed to do so to be reported to social services or prosecuted. 

This is in response to the John Wallis School in Ashford, Kent, which implemented unique pouches for securing gadgets throughout the school day.

Regarding mobile phones, what he says is accurate. The school should mandate that students keep their phones in their bags during the day, even if they are turned off and not using them. However, a lot of students are so dependent on their phones that they feel compelled to keep them on their desks at all times and become agitated if their phones are not in their bags.

It’s a huge disruption trying to get kids to put their phones away, even in exams. It’s almost likened to a drug addiction, with similar withdrawal symptoms, and it hurts every aspect of their lives, and of course, we can’t control what they do or see online.

The main concern with extended school days is safety, as it is unsafe for children to go home from school in the dark during the winter.

Phone zombies are not limited to kids; they are present everywhere.

When youngsters didn’t have mobile phones, they would knock on their friends’ doors before riding their bikes for hours. You couldn’t call your friends or text them to find out where they were; if they got separated, they would just ride around to find each other.

The ‘Spiralling’ Benefits Bill Is Unsustainable, Warns Rishi Sunak 

Rishi Sunak unveiled a ‘moral mission’ to get Brits off benefits today as he warned that numbers out of the workforce are ‘unsustainable’ and ‘tragic’.

In a major speech drawing dividing lines for the election, the PM pledged to crack down on the country’s ‘sick note culture’, insisting normal ‘life worries’ are not a reason to be signed off.

He highlighted that 850,000 more are long-term sick than before the pandemic, with the largest increase among young people.

According to Mr Sunak, in the future, expert teams should evaluate an individual’s capacity for employment rather than GPs, who could be less inclined to adopt a firm stance.

The Prime Minister unveiled a crucial promise for the Tory platform: in the future, benefits would be withheld from everyone found suitable for employment after a year, provided they didn’t follow the guidelines their work coach established.

Mr Sunak stressed that he did not want to make the system less generous for those who genuinely needed support but would not ‘let down’ Brits by refusing to tackle the issue for fear of ‘causing offence’.

‘The situation as it is is economically unsustainable,’ he said. ‘We can’t afford such a spiralling increase in the welfare bill.’

The intervention comes after figures released this week revealed that the number of people considered ‘economically inactive’ after being placed on long-term sickness benefits has jumped by a third since the start of the pandemic and now stands at a staggering 2.8 million.

Around half are signed off with depression, anxiety, and bad nerves.

Overall, 9.4 million people aged between 16 and 64 are economically inactive, meaning they are neither in work nor looking for work.

The PM highlighted figures showing that GPs issue so-called ‘fit notes’ to 94 percent of those who ask for them, with more than 11 million doled out last year.

He said it could be time to end the role of GPs in the system. 

Questions have been raised over whether surgeries need the added workload amid a long backlog of patients in the wake of the pandemic.

In the future, those looking to be signed off could be asked to discuss their health with teams of ‘specialist work and health professionals’ who will assess what work they can do and what help they need to ‘bounce back to the workplace’.

Mr Sunak said, ‘For me, it is a fundamental duty of government to make sure that hard work is always rewarded.

‘I know, and you know, that you don’t get anything in life without hard work.

‘It’s the only way to build a better life for ourselves and our family, and the only way to build a more prosperous country.’

He said that since the pandemic, ‘something has gone wrong’.

‘We now spend £69 billion on benefits for people of working age with a disability or health condition.

‘That’s more than our entire schools budget, more than our transport budget, more than our policing budget.

‘And spending on personal independence payments alone is forecast to increase by more than 50 per cent over the next four years…

‘That’s not right; it’s not sustainable, and it’s not fair on the taxpayers who fund it.’

‘So in the next parliament, a Conservative government will significantly reform and control welfare.’

Mr Sunak said: ‘This is not about making the welfare system less generous to people who face very real extra costs from mental health conditions.

‘For those with the greatest needs, we actually want to make it easier to access with fewer requirements.’

He added that the government’s ‘overall approach is about saying that people with less severe mental health conditions should be expected to engage in the world of work’.

The proposals are called into question over the suitability of those lacking medical training to determine a person’s capacity for employment.

There are, of course, genuine cases of those suffering from mental health, but it’s also now being banded around for anything that relates to life changes. There are indeed many people who need help and perhaps don’t get it, but equally, there are those who need to be told to ‘buck up buttercup’ and get on with it. As for people other than doctors being experts in what is wrong with us, that could become quite controversial.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started