Hewitt Is Not Harry’s Father

Warm-hearted, confident, but also dangerously spontaneous, Prince Harry is as complicated as he is charismatic but there have been reports that have continued for decades about James Hewitt being Prince Harry’s father. Of course, it’s not true, but it sells newspapers.


It isn’t possible that James Hewitt was the father of Harry because he met Princess Diana when Harry was a toddler, although Princess Diana started an affair with James Hewitt after she asked him to be her horse riding instructor in 1986.


Prince Harry was born on the 15 September 1984, James Hewitt and Princess Diana did not meet until 1986. Either where not being told the truth about the age of Prince Harry, or somebody cannot calculate…

Harry takes after his mother’s side of the family, her brother has red hair. Harry has the Spencer genes. Look at Diana’s brother and then Harry and although both Hewitt and Harry are frequently tarred with the same ginger brush, it has been pointed out that Harry’s hair is better characterized as strawberry blond with a red beard.

His eyebrows and eyelashes are light and his eyes are blue and in distinction, Hewitt’s hair is a deeper brown, with brown eyebrows and brown eyes.


Although neither Diana nor Charles were redheads, Diana’s brother Earl Spencer is, therefore Diana could have been carrying ginger genes and Royal authorities have further pointed out Harry’s hair unlike Hewitt’s is curly.

This sort of curly red hair is frequently connected with Scotland and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, Harry’s great-grandmother was a member of the Scottish nobility.

Although not as prominent as his hair colour, Harry yields some characteristics with Prince Charles and his granddad, Prince Philip. All three have small eyes set close to their nose.


These have been called the Mountbatten’s eyes, after Prince Philip’s family name and at 6ft 2ins, Harry is above normal height.

Prince Charles is 5ft 10ins and the Duke of Edinburgh is 6ft and they all yield the Mountbatten bottom which has really low-slung buttocks, allegedly.


His ears are a really similar size and shape to his brother Prince Williams. However, the clue to identifying Harry’s heritage is his teeth.

Harry has tiny upper teeth with really small canine teeth. This is quite rare for a Briton as most Brits, including Hewitt, have big canines.

Harry seemingly received this feature from his granddad Philip, who was a member of the Greek and Danish royal families.

The source who asked not to be identified said that some years ago he had a commission to do a forensic examination of the features of Prince Harry and Hewitt. The only trait they have in common is their chin, and most characteristics are totally different.

To state, they are both gingers is misleading but royal rumours have for years now rumoured that Princess Diana’s former lover, James Hewitt, was the true father of her youngest son, Prince Harry.

Most who accept the conspiracy argument have one single bit of evidence to back up the assertion. Harry’s strong likeness to Hewitt, especially when compared with Prince Charles.

More than three decades after their romance, James Hewitt is still responding to inquiries about the scandal, categorically saying in a news discussion that he is not Prince Harry’s natural daddy. However, those who still don’t believe him are missing an important piece of the puzzle.

There’s no disputing that a young James Hewitt, with his red hair and childish smile, yields a likeness with Prince Harry. However, there’s someone else who yields this same likeness. It’s Princess Diana’s brother, Charles Spencer.

And those who dispute that James Hewitt must be Harry’s daddy because of the family resemblance between them disregard the evidence that the similarity can be seen within the family, with Harry’s pale, red-haired, blue-eyed uncle.

James Hewitt had a romance with the princess when he was an officer in the British army. At the time reports were broadcasting that Prince Charles was further having an affair with his current wife, Camilla Parker-Bowles.

Once cavalry officer James Hewitt rejected he was Prince Harry’s daddy and James Hewitt, who was Diana, Princess of Wales’s mysterious lover for five years, admitted people did compare Harry’s appearances with his own but declared categorically that there actually was no likelihood whatsoever that he was Harry’s daddy and that he was definitely sure that he was not.

He could appreciate the concern but Harry was already walking by the time his association with Diana started and admittedly the red hair is similar to his and people say they look alike.

He never supported these comparisons and although he was with Diana for a long time he stated that he was not Harry’s daddy.

When James Hewitt first met Diana, Harry was already a toddler. Afterall, looking at images of Harry, he’s a much more attractive chap than Hewitt ever was!

James Hewitt had been aware for a while of the concerns of Harry’s fatherhood and that it had been a significant talking point. However, he did not meet the Princess, who died in 1997, until two years after Harry was born and the hateful rumours that still continue about the fathership of Prince Harry used to annoy Diana considerably.

This trash should be thwarted now, Harry was born on September 15, 1984, and Diana did not meet James until the summer of 1986, the red hair is a Spencer trait, not a Hewitt characteristic.


Published by Angela Lloyd

My vision on life is pretty broad, therefore I like to address specific subjects that intrigue me. Therefore I really appreciate the world of politics, though I have no actual views on who I will vote for, that I will not tell you, so please do not ask! I am like an observation station when it comes to writing, and I simply take the news and make it my own. I have no expectations, I simply love to write, and I know this seems really odd, but I don't get paid for it, I really like what I do and since I am never under any pressure, I constantly find that I write much better, rather than being blanketed under masses of paperwork and articles that I am on a deadline to complete. The chances are, that whilst all other journalists are out there, ripping their hair out, attempting to get their articles completed, I'm simply rambling along at my convenience creating my perfect piece. I guess it must look pretty unpleasant to some of you that I work for nothing, perhaps even brutal. Perhaps I have an obvious disregard for authority, I have no idea, but I would sooner be working for myself, than under somebody else, excuse the pun! Small I maybe, but substantial I will become, eventually. My desk is the most chaotic mess, though surprisingly I know where everything is, and I think that I would be quite unsuited for a desk job. My views on matters vary and I am extremely open-minded to the stuff that I write about, but what I write about is the truth and getting it out there, because the people must be acquainted. Though I am quite entertained by what goes on in the world. My spotlight is mostly to do with politics, though I do write other material as well, but it's essentially politics that I am involved in, and I tend to concentrate my attention on that, however, information is essential. If you have information the possibilities are endless because you are only limited by your own imagination...

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: