Nan’s Leg Was Amputated After Routine Foot Scans Were Not Done

A grandmother had to have her leg amputated and subsequently died after a doctor “butchered” her foot instead of running a routine scan for a suspected cyst.

Erna McGuinness went for her annual scan at Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, in August 2020. But her daughter Eileen, 36, has claimed a doctor refused to perform a scan and instead carried out a procedure to remove a mass using scissors that were “not clean.”

She said Erna was left with a massive open wound, which was just bandaged, and by 2 pm the same day she went into septic shock and was rushed back to hospital in an ambulance. There, Erna had to have her left leg amputated due to the infection.

The family took legal action in September 2021, but following delays the NHS offered to settle the case outside of court for a five-figure sum – which Eileen later accepted in November 2025. Tragically, Erna was left bedbound following the amputation, and after her “lifestyle declined” as a consequence, she died in January 2022 aged 67.

The doctor is no longer employed by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Eileen, who was taking some time out from work due to the stress of the case, from Glasgow, Scotland, said: “I don’t know if she was the first person to be wronged by this person.

“I still see that picture of her foot after it happened when I go to bed at night. They actually nearly killed the woman. She said to me, ‘Make sure they don’t get away with what happens to me’. I wanted to be mum’s voice, but I was under so much tension.

“She was only going into hospital for her foot to be looked at on a scan. They went in with a pair of scissors that were not clean. They were like the wee ones you use to cut nose hair with. They left mum’s foot with a very massive open wound that even if you were in reasonable health, you would suffer with.

“They took mum into hospital with septic shock and in resus the surgeon came around – a different surgeon – and said we can take her leg, but she might not make it through surgery, and if we treat her with antibiotics she will not make it after a couple of days. They had to take her leg, and it spiralled from there.”

Eileen said Erna had pleaded to stop the procedure – which she claims was done without anaesthetic. Eileen said: “She said ‘that’s sore’ and ‘you’re hurting me’, but they continued to do what they were doing. I got on the phone to them the following day. They said they’d do the exact same thing again. They played God.”

She continued: “Mum had COPD but apart from that was going to bingo every night, loved her grandchildren and was the happiest woman ever. It killed her in the end – it destroyed her.

“It was the mentality of going from being an independent woman who was so free, cooking her own meals, to where she couldn’t do a thing; for sure that affected her. She had everybody over – this woman used to host Christmas for 27 people, made the best lunches and dinners, and everyone was always welcome for food in her house.

“When her leg went, her whole mental state went. The things I read in the report, I didn’t realise how low she was at the time. She basically wanted to end her life because she couldn’t live in the pain and misery she was in.”

Eileen says the legal case should have gone to the High Court in March 2025 but says it was delayed by the NHS as they were “dragging their heels”. The case was rescheduled to go through the High Court in May 2026, but in November 2025 the NHS offered to settle outside of court.

After six years of back and forth and feeling “traumatised” by the ordeal, Eileen agreed to the five-figure settlement. She said: “I was so tired after six years of back and forward I couldn’t do it any longer. I don’t know how they got away with it for so long.

“I would love mum’s story to be told as not another name in their victim list but for people to remember her name. She always said, ‘if god forbid anything happens to me, let my story be told and don’t let them get away with anything they did’. What they did was inhuman and cruel; they hurt somebody who would have held out her hand and helped them”.

A spokesperson for NHSGGC said: “While we cannot comment on the details of any patient’s care, our sympathies remain with the family of Erna McGuinness. We recognise the care Erna received was not what should have been expected, and we are deeply sorry for her experience and the impact this had. This case was the subject of legal proceedings, which have now concluded.”

I am utterly shocked, because obviously the most logical medical move is to ignore a routine scan and instead hack into someone’s foot with unsterile scissors, leaving everyone wondering — with the deepest sincerity — how on earth this medical genius was ever allowed to practise medicine.

The doctor’s name has not been released anywhere in verified reporting. Every credible source — including Yahoo News UK and Metro — states only that the doctor is “no longer employed by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde”, and no disciplinary outcome or identity has been revealed.

The NHS doesn’t vet doctors; the GMC does, and they determine who is authorised to practise medicine in the UK. If someone has a licence, the NHS presumes they’re safe to employ, and a dangerous clinician can stay in post for years.

Hospitals can remove a doctor without naming them publicly, without a tribunal, and without triggering GMC action. This means the public never sees the warning signs.

Published by Angela Lloyd

My vision on life is pretty broad, therefore I like to address specific subjects that intrigue me. Therefore I really appreciate the world of politics, though I have no actual views on who I will vote for, that I will not tell you, so please do not ask! I am like an observation station when it comes to writing, and I simply take the news and make it my own. I have no expectations, I simply love to write, and I know this seems really odd, but I don't get paid for it, I really like what I do and since I am never under any pressure, I constantly find that I write much better, rather than being blanketed under masses of paperwork and articles that I am on a deadline to complete. The chances are, that whilst all other journalists are out there, ripping their hair out, attempting to get their articles completed, I'm simply rambling along at my convenience creating my perfect piece. I guess it must look pretty unpleasant to some of you that I work for nothing, perhaps even brutal. Perhaps I have an obvious disregard for authority, I have no idea, but I would sooner be working for myself, than under somebody else, excuse the pun! Small I maybe, but substantial I will become, eventually. My desk is the most chaotic mess, though surprisingly I know where everything is, and I think that I would be quite unsuited for a desk job. My views on matters vary and I am extremely open-minded to the stuff that I write about, but what I write about is the truth and getting it out there, because the people must be acquainted. Though I am quite entertained by what goes on in the world. My spotlight is mostly to do with politics, though I do write other material as well, but it's essentially politics that I am involved in, and I tend to concentrate my attention on that, however, information is essential. If you have information the possibilities are endless because you are only limited by your own imagination...

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started