The Descent Into World War III

The surge in global conflict that marred the year 2023 has set alarm bells ringing in the halls of European defence establishments.

Not quite three weeks into 2024 have gone by since the governments of Estonia, Sweden, and now the UK alerted their respective countries to the possibility of an all-out war.

According to leaked German intelligence papers, Berlin is rushing to prepare backup plans in case Russian forces move westward from Belarus and anticipates Russia will begin another round of operations to subjugate Ukraine.

Iran’s so-called “Axis of Resistance,” which includes Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, is intensifying its attacks on Israel and commercial shipping routes. This has prompted the UK and US to launch a series of devastating air and sea strikes. The Israel-Hamas conflict poses a threat to spread violence throughout the Middle East.

Further east, Beijing is even more enraged by Taiwan’s choice of a new president who values democracy, making a Chinese invasion of the island republic in the near future seem increasingly plausible.

Kim Jong Un, meanwhile, is waiting to send his enemies into a radioactive winter by clutching the keys to North Korea’s nuclear weapons.

This week, UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps attempted to summarise the serious dangers that the country and the rest of the world face in a harsh warning address.

“In five years, we may be examining several theatres, such as those in North Korea, China, Iran, and Russia.” With all of the wars that exist around the globe today, do you think that number will increase or decrease?

‘I suspect we all know the answer.’

International security experts are unanimous in their assessment that we are now closer to World War III than we have been since the Cuban Missile Crisis. MailOnline looks at the global “fault lines” that have the potential to entangle Europe in a major military confrontation.

For the first time since the conclusion of World War II, the threat of a major military conflict returned to Europe with Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

The UK and EU jumped to Ukraine’s rescue right away, slamming economic penalties on Moscow and providing billions of dollars in military and humanitarian aid to support Kyiv’s war effort.

However, with over two years of fighting gone and no obvious end in sight, European countries must now face the very real potential that the war may continue indefinitely and maybe even beyond Ukraine’s borders.

In an alarming speech earlier this month, Sweden’s Civil Defence Minister Carl-Oskar Bohlin said, ‘There could be war in Sweden… The world is facing a security outlook with greater risks than at any time since the end of the Second World War,’ urging his citizens to join voluntary civil defence groups.

All of this, meanwhile, could have been planned to support Agenda 21 and the world’s ultimate saviour, and it’s not that slow now; it’s full tilt.

Politicians and the rich set off wars, but the end result is invariably the civilian casualty rate.

Old men start wars, and young men die in them. However, in a nuclear war, it wipes out everyone.

Perhaps these idiot world leaders could just meet up on a field and sort it all out with their fists instead of killing innocent civilians that want no part whatsoever with all this crap. I’d even pay Sky Box Office money to watch it, plus VAT, of course.

Seriously, though, somebody only needs to push the button, and then we will all go kaboom.

On A Remote Stretch Of Road Near Meelon, WA, A Driver Comes Across A Bizarre Scene

A dashcam caught the moment a frightened driver came across three people in the middle of a highway late at night.

Just before 11 p.m. on Monday, the video was taken close to Meelon, which is located 105 kilometres south of Perth.

It shows the motorist approaching a bright light before two guys are seen pulling a third person lying in the centre of the road.

The motorist was startled, veered to avoid colliding with the group, and stopped as soon as he was clear of them.

Hundreds of commentators expressed amazement over the trio’s negligence and questioned whether the motorist was wounded.

‘That could so easily have been three people squashed,’ one said.

‘Did the other car hit that guy?’ another wrote.

‘Let’s just park with our high beam on, no hazard lights, and run onto the dark road on a corner with nothing reflective,’ another joked.

‘Weird situation. Would love to know the story behind it,’ a fourth said.

‘Just having a nap in the middle of the road,’ another wrote.

Western Australia Police has been approached by the Daily Mail Australia for a response.

In some countries, sites like that are staged so that you will stop, and then they can rob you. Typically, women are targeted while men hide.

It looks like an attempted alien abduction, but when the aliens realised they had an Aussie they threw him back out.

It’s said that kind, compassionate people are greatly disadvantaged in life since they are unable to recognise negative traits in others.

I would always put myself in a good but sceptical mindset, and I always think about how bad the situation is and then weigh up if I wanted to help them. Kind of like a risk assessment. Take it for what it is because safety is number one before I give any help.

Bad guys use these tricks to get people to pull over and offer help, no different from any other country. Advice would be not to stop driving. Wait till you’re far enough away and then safely stop and call the police.

Watching the video, it looked like something out of The Blaire Witch Project movie.

It came across as an eerie sight. What could it be, it didn’t say.

It looked like someone was maybe being dragged, and the other people involved looked like they were on the ground. This was definitely a strange, dark and mysterious story form. However, it’s not a very clear video.

Parking Nightmare For Gordon Ramsay!

Gordon Ramsay was pictured leaving his £313,000 Ferrari parked on double yellow lines as he visited a friend.

In Padstow, Cornwall, the famous chef, 57, was seen driving his Ferrari Purosangue.

He was rumoured to be paying a visit to his protégé, Paul Ainsworth, who manages the fishing port’s No. 6 restaurant.

The restaurant has four AA Rosettes and was given a Michelin star in 2013.

But Ramsay swerved the main car park in the town and instead left his supercar on double yellow lines under a sign saying ‘no parking’ on N Quay Parade overlooking the harbour.

The father-of-six, host of TV shows such as Kitchen Nightmares and Hell’s Kitchen, was snapped by Guy Wilson, who shared his pictures on the Private Number Plate Spotters group on Facebook.

One member of the group quipped: ‘Double yellow lines must not count when the car is so expensive.’

The chef, who was born in Renfrewshire, faced criticism earlier this week after he posted a video of a “full Scottish” burger being made at his flagship restaurant in Edinburgh.

Observers took issue with the £18 cost of the square sausage burger, as well as the fact it contains salad, despite being labelled ‘full Scottish’, and lacks key elements of a traditional Scottish breakfast such as haggis, potato scone, and black pudding.

A short video shows the burger being made at the Gordon Ramsay Street Burger restaurant in Edinburgh’s St James Quarter.

It features lettuce, a tomato slice, a hash brown, eggs, and Lorne sausage.

The 57-year-old shared the clip to social media on Wednesday with the caption: ‘Try the full Scottish at Gordon Ramsay Street Burger Edinburgh—with Lorne sausage, a hash brown and an over easy egg.’

More than 1,100 people liked Ramsay’s post, while more than 700 people commented, making fun of the celebrity chef’s most recent culinary innovation.

Gavin Brewis said: ‘Full Scottish with no tattie scone, haggis or black pudding and with a hash brown, which is not actually full Scottish content.’

Another said: ’18 quid for a sausage and egg doubler—no Scottish person would put salad on a breakfast roll.’

At the moment, Ramsay owns and runs around 58 restaurants worldwide.

They include restaurants in the US, France, Dubai, Singapore, and a few in the UK.

Gordon Ramsay’s reps have been approached by MailOnline for comment.

For what reason does Gordon Ramsay think he can park on a yellow line? Maybe since he’s rich, it makes him feel like he’s above the law.

He probably doesn’t believe he’s above the law; he just thinks that the parking ticket will cost him buttons anyway.

Fines should be proportionate to the wealth of the owner. Make it 6 per cent of his annual income, then let’s see if he does it again.

Celebrity chef? The jury is still out on that one. He’s foul-mouthed, but he can cook.

Whether or not you have the money to pay the fine is irrelevant. The idea is that without everyone abiding by the law, anarchy would envelop the entire nation, but then money doesn’t buy good taste.

Not shocked at all, as all these overpaid so-called celebrities think that only common people like us are subject to the rules, and I’m not sure how he can justify paying all that money for one car. After all, it only takes you from A to B. Arrogance personified.

These wealthy people have too much money to care about fines. That’s the problem with rich people. They live under a different rock than the rest of us.

With untold wealth comes untold arrogance.

Government Minister Reveals AI Systems Are Already Being Used To Read Papers That Ministers Should Be Reading

It has come to light that ministers have already started utilising AI systems to sift through papers and choose which ones are more crucial.

The Cabinet Office’s experimental “AI Red Box,” which Alex Burghart, a Conservative minister, has acknowledged he uses to sift through the piles of files he is assigned to read each day.

Alex Chisolm, a senior civil official, and another minister are allegedly also utilising the experimental system, according to the Minister for Implementation.

He also said that authorities attempted to set up a chatbot that would be able to answer public inquiries on the Gov.UK website and have access to the whole collection of official data.

However, this experiment was ultimately scrapped when it did ‘some strange things’ which included randomly speaking French as well as being incorrect about a fifth of the time.

When describing the ‘AI red box’, Mr Burghart told an event in Westminster: ‘What it does is it can read documents that go into your red box, it can summarise them, it can highlight connections between papers, connections between previous papers.

‘And over time, as we fine-tune this model, it will become, I believe, be the institutional memory of the department.’

He said that while a lot of good people pass through the Cabinet Office, ‘they don’t always stay that long.’

He continued: ‘It means that things that happened three, four, or five years ago are not around anymore.

‘But with an effective AI red box, that won’t be a problem any more.’

Lib Dem Treasury spokesperson Sarah Olney MP said: ‘MPs and Ministers spending time to look over casework and policy is bread and butter.

‘If they can’t be bothered to read things for themselves, we may as well let the robots run the country. Which can’t be much more worse than this Conservative mess.’

The goal of Mr Burghart’s team, the Member of Parliament for Brentwood and Ongar, is to obtain funds to implement the system throughout Whitehall by going to the Treasury in the spring.

The Government Digital Service attempted to create a chatbot like ChatGPT to serve as the front end for Gov.UK, which is the world’s first system of its sort.

Nevertheless, this concept was ultimately shelved.

‘If you asked it questions in a particular way, it responded in French,’ Mr Burghart admitted.

If AI is used by the government, we are in for a very scary time, and if they’re using AI, then there is a real case to reduce the number of MPs that we have. The results can’t be any worse for us, surely.

Beyond that, are these lazy gits incapable of reading for themselves? It just goes to show how educated they are with all their university degrees.

Rishi Sunak could be replaced by Chatbot, and literally, no one would be any the wiser.

This is something to consider. When the Prime Minister and his ministers make a decision, based on a summary and recommendation that nobody had any input into, who will they blame when it all goes wrong? I don’t think they’ve thought this one through.

There needs to be a new rule that stipulates that indolent MPs should be fired if they don’t read anything and instead rely on AI to tell them what needs to be done. Each day passes and these MPs get more and more indolent, and it just proves how bad our government is.

Queen’s Fury Over Naming Of Baby Lilibet

According to a new book, Queen Elizabeth was enraged by Harry and Meghan’s assertion that she had approved of their baby Lilibet’s name.

One member of her staff says the monarch was ‘as angry as I’d ever seen her’ after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex publicly stated they would not have used her private family nickname if she had not been ‘supportive’.

The pair also directed Schillings, their assertive legal team, to send letters to newspapers, news networks, and the BBC in particular, disputing the false and defamatory accusations that she was not sought for permission.

But when the Sussexes sought to ‘co-opt’ Buckingham Palace into ‘propping up’ their version of events, they were ‘rebuffed’.

The newest installment of the intriguing new biography Charles III: New King, New Court contains an enlightening revelation. Robert Hardman, a writer for the Mail, is now serialising his book The Inside Story only in the Daily Mail.

It has already made public a remarkable memo that details the late Queen’s final hours. The memo is currently housed in the Royal Archives and notes that, before quietly passing away, the late Queen finished her final paperwork box and left two sealed letters inside, one of which was addressed to her son and heir.

In today’s installment, Hardman delves into the ramifications behind Prince Andrew and the Sussexes’ contentious choice to resign from their royal duties. This includes how:

Prince William considered his brother’s criticism of his wife, Kate, to be “the lowest of the low,” especially the idea that males in the Royal Family should only wed women who “fit the mould.”

The prince was reportedly ‘mortified’ by Harry’s ‘casual breach’ of so many sibling secrets in his biography, Spare.

William and King Charles have never read Spare and never will. But ‘the main points’ have been communicated to them by personnel.

Charles has learned to ‘compartmentalise’ domestic stress, even if Harry’s actions left him severely traumatised.

He now feels ‘exasperation’ over the situation. ‘He has done what he can, and now that he is King, there are many more things to think about,’ says a friend.

However, he insists the door is always open to his youngest son. ‘You’d always like your child back,’ says a senior official.

In his interviews with current and former members of the Royal Family, acquaintances, and palace employees, Hardman provides fascinating insights into Harry’s relationships with his family.

It is unknown to us whether the Queen was angry, and she likely never will be since she is no longer with us. If she had been angry, she would have likely kept this to herself with that stiff upper lip of hers, and if she had ever been emotional, she would never have let the public witness it.

Lilibet was what Princess Margaret called her sister when they were younger because she couldn’t say Elizabeth. The Queen could, of course, have been angry about it; on the other hand, she might have thought it was a nice thing to do to keep the legacy going, even though that particular name would have been precious to her.

However, it was their child and their choice, and they were both bound to upset along the way, but we can’t please everybody.

The point is that the Queen is no longer with us, so it is unnecessary for us to continue being rude and pulling up these old tales. Yes, there is; it’s profitable.

It’s not like it was a private nickname for the Queen. Everyone in the world knew about it.

According To Figures, A Third Of RAF Personnel Suffer From Physical Or Mental Issues, Which Makes Them Unfit For Duty

According to official statistics, three out of ten soldiers from all branches of the Armed Forces are not completely prepared for battle.

The largest issue with medically unfit soldiers is seen in the Royal Air Force, where 32.9 per cent of its 29,010 troops suffer from physical or mental health issues.

In the meantime, 28.2 per cent of the 74,110 troops in the British Army have medical issues that may prevent them from participating in front-line operations.

Just 25.9 per cent of the Royal Navy’s 29,220 personnel have reported health issues that mean they may not be fit for service.

According to the Sunday Telegraph, 38,033 out of the 132,340 total personnel in the Armed Forces—or 28.7 per cent—are not completely prepared for battle.

The crisis will put pressure on Defence Secretary Grant Shapps at a time when Britain is struggling to retain its global influence due to recruitment problems.

The total number of regular troops and voluntary reserves across all branches of the military in December was 184,865, which is 7,440 fewer than the previous year and the lowest since the 19th-century Napoleonic Wars.

Last year, Lord Dannatt, the former chief of staff of the United Kingdom, issued a warning that the country could no longer conduct concurrent operations, such as battles in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The £3 billion aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth was unable to support operations against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who were sponsored by Iran, due to the fact that its support ship, RFA Fort Victoria, only had a skeleton crew. This revealed concerns over operational preparedness.

Former Army intelligence officer Colonel Phil Ingram said: ‘The Ministry of Defence has serious recruitment problems – they can’t recruit enough to replace those leaving and it seems a large percentage of those they keep in are not fit to fight.

‘This is a clear indication of a broken system and the MoD needs to realise this and come up with a plan to fix it quickly.

‘Otherwise, in a world growing more unstable by the day, our very national security could be compromised because we might find ourselves in a situation where we need a large number of troops very quickly and we haven’t got them.’

Out of those who were demoted from frontline operations, 13,727 had musculoskeletal ailments from battle or training.

Back in the day, you were let go if you weren’t medically fit. You were let go if your basic fitness test resulted in a failure and if you were found guilty of a crime.

The regulations of our military have drastically altered, recruiting is now open to everybody, and everything has gone to pot. Removing the standards demoralised the military and, to be honest, the recruiting process.

Regretfully, wokeism has permeated every aspect of life. It resembles an incurable sickness, or cancer if you will.

Our troops’ core has been shattered, and now nobody wants to enlist in the military. To battle for what? A country that despises you. No, it’s time to move aside and make room for variety.

The good old days are over; allowing the weak to join the military results in zero combat power.

Once, getting in was a challenge. The process of selection was exhaustive. A rigorous medical examination was conducted, and a 6-week recruit training schedule assessed fitness. You were denied entry if your test results were poor.

Recruiting is now simple. Our military is accepting everyone from wherever, and scores are low as well as medical standards.

As A Precaution, Electric Buses Are Taken Off The Roads After One Exploded On The School Run

Several electric buses have been removed from operation after last week’s school run in Wimbledon saw one catch fire.

Commuters were swiftly evacuated after a huge blast ripped off the back off an Optare Metrodecker 1050 bus travelling from Mitcham to Raynes Park in South West London at 7.20 am on Friday, January 12.

Consequently, buses operating on the 200 route have been pulled off the road as a “precaution” by Transport for London (TfL) until the cause of the Wimbledon Hill Road fire is investigated.

Fire expert Neil Pedersen stated that the reason was most likely an electrical malfunction and unrelated to lithium batteries. TfL is currently collaborating with the bus operator London General and the manufacturer Switch to look into the matter.

“As a precaution, the fleet of buses that normally operate on route 200 is being temporarily withdrawn from service by GoAhead while the investigation continues, with other vehicles being brought in to cover,” said Tom Cunnington, TfL’s head of bus business development, in an interview with the Guardian.

‘All buses made by the relevant manufacturer will be checked thoroughly as a matter of priority.

‘Other buses in the fleet remain in service and TfL and bus operators will not hesitate to take further action if required to ensure the network remains safe.’

Eight routes in and around London, numbered 23, 28, 134, 295, 317, 626, and N28, are served by almost 80 Metrodecker buses.

TfL, which operates over 1,000 electric buses throughout its network, declared after the incident on Friday that it would not be pulling out any Metrodeckers and that they were safe.

A TfL spokeswoman told MailOnline at the time: ‘London’s bus network remains safe to use and other buses in the fleet remain in service. TfL and bus operators will not hesitate to take action if required to ensure the network remains safe.’

A second London bus caught fire, destroying it entirely, less than twenty-four hours after the Wimbledon incident.

The hybrid vehicle caught fire in North Woolwich, East London, just before 7 a.m., with onlookers shouting ‘what the f***’ as they were urged to ‘move back, get back’. The bus involved in the blaze was an Alexander Dennis Enviro400 hybrid that runs on diesel and electricity, with about 900 in use across 78 routes in London.

Because of the possibility of the batteries exploding or catching fire, TfL has prohibited the public from taking e-bikes and e-scooters onto its trains and buses. However, it has since been discovered that their vehicles are just as prone to create issues.

Naturally, some of it is not zero at all because sources of energy are also needed to charge the batteries.

Each windmill required enormous amounts of carbon energy to ship and erect, even with solar power.

Every time energy is changed from oil, gas or coal to electricity, some energy is wasted. Some more energy is then wasted again going from electricity into batteries, there is so much wrong with this net zero rubbish con. Ten or more years from now they will be complaining that batteries are being dumped everywhere.

Electric vehicles don’t bother me, but the present battery technology is hazardous to the environment in both its production and its recycling process.

Aside from appearing unstable and prone to thermal runaway, they are also extremely difficult to put out since they supply both oxygen and fuel.

The infrastructure and generating capacity in the UK are insufficient to meet demand, and internal combustion engine cars cannot be replaced by electric vehicles due to their immaturity. It is not possible to run before you can walk, and this has not been well considered.

Finally, The Mystery Of Peru’s Tiny Aliens Is Solved

The mystery of the two so-called aliens, said to be proof of extraterrestrial life, that were seized by Peruvian customs agents in October has finally been solved by forensic scientists.

In October, the globe was captivated by two objects that were about a foot long and resembled miniature grey humanoids with three fingers on each hand. Many people believed that the items were the remains of two alien bodies.

They were seized by Peruvian border guards from a shipment heading to Mexico and were later sent to scientists for investigation by Peru’s prosecutor’s office.

However, forensic examination has since revealed that they are composed of metal, paper, glue, and animal and human bones.

Forensic archaeologist Flavio Estrada, who led the analysis, said the claims that the two objects came from other worlds are ‘totally false.’

‘The conclusion is simple: they are dolls assembled with bones of animals from this planet, with modern synthetic glues; therefore, they were not assembled during pre-Hispanic times.

‘They are not extraterrestrials; they are not aliens.’

Scientists told reporters that the three-fingered hands were ‘very poorly’ built and were created with human bones, while the rest of the dolls’ bodies were built with the bones of dogs, birds, and other animals.

The identity of the dolls’ owner has not yet been determined by Peru’s prosecutor’s office.

The dolls’ intended recipient was only mentioned by officials as being a Mexican citizen; they did not provide their identity.

Mexico’s Congress was the subject of ridicule last year after UFO enthusiast Jaime Maussen held court several times to prove that the mummified remains were of extraterrestrial origin.

With the arrival of a team of experts in November, Maussan said that the figurines were ‘genuine,’ consisting of a single skeleton, and revealed that thirty per cent of them were ‘not from any recognised species’ through DNA analysis.

‘This is the first time extraterrestrial life has been presented in this manner, Maussan said to Congress.

‘We have a clear example of non-human specimens unrelated to any known species on our planet.

‘The public has the right to know about non-human technology and beings. This reality unites humanity rather than dividing us. We are not alone in this vast universe; we should embrace this truth.’

Maussan further mentioned that the two bodies are toothless, have strong bones, and have implants consisting of the rare Earth metals osmium and cadmium, which are both soft, silvery-white, and bluish-white.

What an enormous waste of time and money!

Paper Mache aliens: what’s next?

Finding glue, paper, metal, and animal bones wouldn’t have required much forensic work. They must think that we, the public, will believe anything. Well, admittedly, some do!

To be honest, I was more shocked to learn that the Pope was a Catholic.

The Foreign Office Spends £200k On ‘Crisis Media Training’ In £4 Million Consultant Splurge

Last year, the Foreign Office paid consultants close to £4 million of taxpayer money, including £200,000 for “crisis media training days.”

It is more than twice as much as the department paid for outside consultants the year before. It comes as the department’s spending on temporary agency personnel has reached a record high of about £40 million, an increase of more than 850 per cent since 2018.

A contract worth £200,000 for “crisis media training” was negotiated a few days following David Cameron’s unexpected reappearance in the political spotlight as Foreign Secretary. Staff members will receive instruction on how to “present the public face” of the government to the media “during a crisis response” throughout the training days.

According to the contract, civil personnel would receive training in “managing the media in a crisis setting, roaming media, social media, and managing crisis-specific messaging.” After six foreign secretaries in five years, the Foreign Office has learned from a string of disasters, notably the disastrous evacuation of Afghans from Kabul in August 2021.

Additionally, in April of this year, the Foreign Office faced new accusations of deserting British nationals following delays in the civilian evacuation of the war-torn capital of Sudan, Khartoum. The Sunday Mirror reported in 2021 that the Home Office, led by Priti Patel, had hired a private crisis management firm using public money to assist them in handling “incidents” in 2020.

In March 2020, Black Dog Crisis Management was engaged at a cost of £16,000 to conduct a “debriefing exercise” with department employees. In November 2020, they were invited in for a second time to “deliver impartial debriefing exercise and follow-up work following a complex critical incident”. The value of this second deal was £19,200.

The Home Office refused to identify which crises the firm was brought in to deal with.

To be honest, any other party in power would most likely spend the same amount, but we wouldn’t likely hear about it. Of course, wasting taxpayers’ money is not okay.

Why do they compensate advisors? Government employees are employed because they are expected to be well-versed in such matters and what is necessary. What would be the use of belonging to a government entity if you just hired someone else to tell you what to do?

Perhaps the Tories are just trying to spend as much money as possible so that if Labour wins the General Election, they have nothing to start with when they get into power. It’s only taxpayers’ money after all.

They don’t have any concept, concerns or cares about spending money like it’s gone out of fashion, simply because it’s not theirs, and it’s the taxpayers’ who are having two fingers stuck up at them.

It also demonstrates the extent to which our government controls the media and how they are now concealing the truth in a variety of ways, anything that has a ‘Con’ in it is a con.

Leaders Of The Warped Jihadi Terror Cell Who Planned To Rival 7/7 And Transform Birmingham Into A ‘Little War Zone’ Could Be Free To Walk The Streets In WEEKS

Leaders of a jihadi terror cell who planned an attack to rival 7/7 and transform Birmingham into a ‘little war zone’ could be free to walk the streets in weeks.

In 2013, Ashik Ali and Irfan Khalid received life sentences with a minimum of 18 years served.

However, both have been given hearings before the Parole Board in the upcoming weeks, which means they may be allowed to leave prison.

The pair were leaders of the gang, along with Irfan Naseer, which was smashed by Britain’s biggest-ever anti-terrorism probe.

They intended to use timers to blow up to eight explosives that were concealed in rucksacks.

When undercover police busted the group in September 2011, fearing an impending terrorist strike, the plan was thwarted.

Detectives said it was the most significant to be foiled since a 2006 conspiracy to blow up transatlantic airliners using bombs disguised as soft drinks.

Their trial judge, Mr Justice Henriques, said the plot ‘had the blessing of al-Qaeda’ and with the intention to ‘further the aims of al-Qaeda’.

He told the defendants when sentencing them: ‘You were seeking to recruit a team of somewhere between six and eight suicide bombers to carry out a spectacular bombing campaign, one that would create an anniversary along the lines of 7/7 or 9/11.

‘It’s clear that you were planning a terrorist outrage in Birmingham.’

Ali told police he would have put on a suicide vest and shot troops, while Khalid had boasted that the attack would be “another 9/11.”

Naseer, who is still incarcerated, was identified as the key conspirator at the sentence.

The judge added: ‘Many deaths were planned by a determined team of individuals who were fully radicalised.

‘No lack of assets, skill or manpower was going to stop you.’

Tory MP Nigel Mills has now said: ‘It is a terrifying prospect to think that these two individuals could be freed in the coming weeks.

‘I sincerely hope the Parole Board takes into account the danger they posed and what death and destruction they were planning.’

On the streets of Birmingham, the group pretended to be reputable charity workers and took hundreds of pounds from gullible bystanders.

They collected £12,000 for themselves by posing as street vendors for Muslim Aid, but after losing more than £9,000 of the money they won in currency trading, they had to seek loans totalling tens of thousands of pounds.

Why are they being allowed parole when they were both given minimum sentences of eighteen years? The legal system in our nation is just flawed.

These are insane zealots, and after serving out the entirety of their term, they need to be immediately flown back to their original location.

There are plenty of foolish politicians and leaders who are too preoccupied with padding their salaries and savouring their positions of power to give a damn about the real nations they represent.

Some people should never be permitted to lead countries or stay in the United Kingdom because their sole goal is to harm us. After all, attacking us isn’t a crime in their law.

With their ‘lock them up’ strategy for every little infraction, the Tories have completely failed to handle the prison system. As a result, our prisons are overcrowded, dilapidated, and underfunded, and serve as havens for radicalization.

And why were they even in the United Kingdom in the first place? Because we take all the crap nobody else wants.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started