New Information About The Princess Diana Tapes Has Been Revealed

Unheard tapes of Princess Diana claiming getting married to King Charles was ridiculous. That he wanted a girl instead of Prince Harry and how she hated her stepmother have been revealed in bombshell recordings.

The audio was recorded by Diana in the 1990s for her biographer Andrew Morton, who went on to publish the bestselling book Diana: Her True Story.

Snippets of the clips, which are set to air in an upcoming documentary and have been released just a day after the 26th anniversary of Diana’s death in a car crash, have been released in the US.

Diana claims in the recording that Charles told her mother Frances Shand Kydd at Prince Harry’s christening in 1984: ‘We’re so disappointed, we thought it would be a girl’.

Frances then ‘snapped his head off’ and told him he should ‘realise you are lucky to have a child’. Diana added.

The release of the clips could be especially damaging for King Charles because they came just a week before the first anniversary of the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II.

Another clip reveals Diana’s disdain for her stepmother Raine Spencer, who her father John had married in 1976 after her mother Frances had left.

After John’s death in 1992, Raine left the family seat of Althorp due to the strained relationship she had with Charles and Diana. Diana is heard saying that she was so angry and that she told her that she hated her so much and that if only she knew how much they all hated her for what she had done.

Diana was heard saying that Raine had ruined the house and had spent all of her father’s money and that she had no idea how much pain mother put her father through.

Diana and her siblings are said to have referred to their stepmother as ‘Acid Raine’ and frequently sang ‘Raine, Raine, go away!’.

The upcoming documentary, which was announced on Good Morning America, US network ABC’s headline show, was a follow-up to the 2017 production Diana: In Her Own Words.

It’s expected to air on Disney + early next year. Both Harry and Meghan have previously been interviewed on ABC’s GMA.

Harry promoted his memoir Spare on the network in January, whilst the Duchess of Sussex popped up on GMA to talk up the Disney documentary Elephant, which she narrated.

The King saying that he wanted a girl doesn’t mean that he didn’t love his son. However, sometimes when the child isn’t the sex that the parent wanted, they never bond with them, and an unwanted child will never feel wanted because the parent will most probably pick favourites.

I’m sure that this would be extremely upsetting for Harry to hear and the King should have been extremely happy with what he was blessed with, two sons. Okay, so people think that Harry is a bit of a letdown, but nevertheless, Harry is still his son, and blood is thicker than water.

Just because the King wanted a girl, but got another son doesn’t mean he loves him any less. Wanting one of each is hardly a crime.

Some would say that it was time to leave this poor woman alone and her family in peace, but on the other hand, perhaps she would have wanted the public to know the truth, otherwise, why would she have recorded these things – for the public to know what really went on in the Royal Family!

Of course, things go on in every family, and there are loads of skeletons in one’s closet and people are noisy by nature. They say they don’t really want to know, but actually, they do because they’re curious and they want to know all about the Royal Family who are at the forefront of this country – let’s see how many skeletons there really are!

Pregnant Ta’Kiya Young, 21, Was Shot Dead By An Ohio Cop After She Drove Into An Officer

Startling bodycam footage shows the moment a pregnant black woman was shot dead by police after she drove into an officer in a Kroger parking lot.

Ta’Kiya Young, 21, was a mother to two young children and was pregnant with a third when she was shot dead inside her car in Blendon Township, Ohio last Thursday after rolling her car into a police officer. The unborn child was also killed.

Local police officers approached Ta’Kiya Young in her automobile after a Kroger store worker accused her of shoplifting. The family’s lawyer denies she was involved in the theft.

Sean Walton, an attorney representing Young’s family, said the video clearly shows that the shooting was unjustified and has called for the officer to be fired and charged immediately.

He said the video did nothing but confirm the family’s fears that Ta’Kiya was murdered groundlessly, and it was just heartbreaking for them to see Ta’Kiya having her life taken away under such ridiculous circumstances. and that her family are heartbroken.

Police on Friday released the bodycam footage, and an investigation conducted by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation remains ongoing.

The video shows one officer talking to Young at her window, while another stands at the front of the bonnet of her automobile.

Young is seen rolling down her car window and asking police why she’s being stopped before turning the steering wheel and rolling her car forward into the second officer.

Shortly before the shot was fired, Young could be heard asking if they were going to shoot her.

The second officer then fires a single shot through the windscreen, ultimately resulting in her death.

Young’s car continues to glide forward until it hits the brick wall of the grocery store to the right.

The officers follow the moving car and smash the driver’s side window.

Blendon Township Chief John Belford said in a statement on Friday that within 10 seconds of getting Young out of her vehicle, officers called for paramedics and within 90 seconds, an emergency room doctor, who was in the parking lot at the time, began helping police to treat her.

A statement released on behalf of Young’s family after viewing the footage called Young’s death ‘avoidable’ and a ‘hateful act’.

The statement read that Ta’Kiya was a beacon of love, strength and energy to all who knew her.

What I find weird is that the cop decided to go and stand directly in front of the automobile, given that the victim was behind the wheel and the car engine was on. What brain cell was that cop using that day?

Undoubtedly, the young woman was attempting to get away from the police. She asked if they were going to shoot her and she was terrified that he would shoot her anyway, which of course, he did. It’s not like she was waving a weapon about. She was of no threat to them at all! And she was shot in cold blood.

Firstly, the officers should have told her to turn off her engine and step out of the vehicle. Clearly, they could see that she was pregnant of no threat to them, and not only did they kill her at short range, but they also killed her unborn child.

Let’s face it. Do people really think that this outcome was necessary and would this have happened if she had been a white 21-year-old woman? I seriously doubt it.

All they really needed to do was take her registration number and put out a warrant for her arrest. It’s not like she was running anywhere anytime soon being pregnant.

Black Lives Matter – I seriously doubt it. Racism against the law – I seriously doubt it. Equality for all – Do me a favour! 

At His Family Mausoleum, Mohamed Al Fayed Is Buried With His Son 

Mohamed Al Fayed has died aged 94, almost 26 years to the day of the crash that killed his son and Princess Diana.

Mohamed Al Fayed went to his grave holding on to his obsession that his son and Princess Diana were murdered in a Paris road tunnel on August 31, 1997.

At Diana’s inquest in London, the bitter billionaire explosively accused Prince, now King, Charles of being ‘happy’ now that the Royal Family had ‘cleared the decks, they finished her, they murdered her’.

He spent more than a decade saying that the Royal Family had alleged involvement in the car crash.

Mr Al Fayed was the world’s 1,493rd richest person, according to Forbes, worth an estimated $2 billion (£1.59 billion). He installed the Egyptian Room in his Knightsbridge store, which boasted several busts of himself, and he also created a memorial to Dodi and Diana, who were dating at the time of their deaths.

He’s supposed to have thought the couple were hours away from announcing their engagement.

Twenty years on from their deaths, friends said he continued to claim that his son Dodi and Diana were killed by security services.

His assertions led to the Harrods store being stripped of its four royal warrants, the right to say that the company supplied goods by appointment to the Royal Family, and in later years, his ramblings about the princess’s demise were overpowered by accusations against the tycoon himself.

A string of women came forward in 2017 to accuse him of sexual assault. One alleged girl said she was a 15-year-old schoolgirl when he grabbed her and ‘started rubbing himself on her chest’. Another was 17 when she said he coaxed her into a swimsuit and tried to kiss her.

Mr Al Fayed was questioned by the Metropolitan Police and afterwards was not seen in public. He had homes in Surrey and his native Egypt but became a complete recluse.

Mohamed Al Fayed was born in 1929 and was the son of an Egyptian school inspector. He was raised in Alexandria and in his early years, he established a shipping company before moving to the United Kingdom, working his way into high society, despite being refused British Citizenship twice.

He owned Harrods from 1985 to 2010 and still owned the Paris Ritz which he purchased in 1979.

It’s extremely sad that Mohamed Al Fayed has passed away, but happy that he and his son have been finally reunited. He appeared to be a lovely gentleman but he bore too much pain. Nobody’s child should be taken before their parent.

I liked him, but sadly he never had any peace when Dodi and Diana were killed, and respect should go to this man for his success because it wasn’t handed to him on a plate. He became successful through hard work and lived life to the full.

Another Jab Appears To Have Been Taken At The Royal Family By Prince Harry

Prince Harry has claimed he didn’t have a support network after returning from serving in Afghanistan and his trauma dating back to his mother Princess Diana’s death was ‘never discussed’, in another obvious swipe at the Royal Family.

The Duke of Sussex launched his new ‘Heart Of Invictus’ series on Netflix, and is at the forefront of the five-part documentary along with injured veterans, with his wife Meghan Markle emerging only briefly in several scenes to support him.

Harry also explained that it was only when he returned from war that he became aware of the trauma he still had from Diana dying in Paris in 1997 when he was aged 12.

Harry said that when he returned from the war in 2008, the ‘biggest struggle for him was no one around him really could help’, adding that he didn’t have that support structure, that network or that expert advice to identify what was actually going on with him.

He also told the show that unfortunately, like most people, the first time you consider therapy is when you’re lying on the floor in the foetal position probably wishing you had dealt with some of this stuff previously, and that’s what he really wanted to change.

In the Sussexes’ latest project as part of their £80 million deal with Netflix, Harry introduces himself as a father of two, dog owner and husband. 

In the Sussexes’ latest project as part of their £80million deal with Netflix, Harry presents himself as a father of two, dog owner and husband.

The Duke of Sussex is asked by an interviewer: ‘What’s your name?’, and he replies: ‘My name’s Harry.’ The interviewer then says: ‘What do you do, Harry?’

He replies: ‘What do I do? On any given day? I’m a dad of two under-three-year-olds, got a couple of dogs, husband, I’m founding patron of Invictus Games Foundation. There’s lots of hats that one wears, but I believe today is all about Invictus.’

Also in the show, Harry and Meghan were seen in a private moment together before a speech at the Salute to Freedom Gala for veterans in New York in November 2021, in which the duke can be heard confiding in the duchess about his nerves.

Harry is heard saying: ‘We haven’t done this for a while… My heart [is] like “digidigadigadiga”‘. He paces around nervously backstage.

Harry trained as an Apache helicopter commander in 2013 after three years of training. While on a five-month tour of Afghanistan, he served as a co-pilot gunner, sharing flying assignments and taking control of the weapons of the two-man Apache.

Evidently, Harry tells us in his memoir that he killed twenty-five people during his two tours of duty, and that it wasn’t the number that filled him with satisfaction, nor did it embarrass him.

So, why did Harry leave Afghanistan? The decision was largely on the grounds that the worldwide media coverage of Harry in Afghanistan could impact the security of those who were deployed there, as well as the dangers to him as an individual soldier.

Harry served in the British Army for ten years. He completed two tours of Afghanistan, one spanning 2007 to 2008 and the other from 2012 to 2013. He gained the rank of captain in 2011 and qualified as an Apache Aircraft commander.

Prince Harry, who served for ten years in the Army and did two tours in Afghanistan is not allowed to wear military uniform because he’s not an active member of the Royal Family, although I don’t see why this should matter, he served his country like others did and he should be allowed to wear his uniform with dignity, whether he’s a working royal or not.

He also has an Afghanistan Service Medal and a Golden, Diamond and Platinum Jubilee medal. He also wears the KCVO Star, representing the Royal Victorian Order, which recognises distinguished personal service to the monarch of the Commonwealth.

The impact of the Afghanistan war affected those who served in the war and most of the soldiers suffered from depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Numerous soldiers never came home the same person and had to have counselling and some kind of therapy, and some in the service who didn’t get counselling took their own lives.

This war would have impacted Harry in some sort of way, particularly if he saw his brothers-in-arms die in battle. That has to have some kind of impact on a person, after all, we are all human beings, not robots.

Harry was already extremely fragile after his mother passed, and yes, many people out there have a parent that has died or parents that have died, but some are better equipped at dealing with the situation than others are, and losing a parent at such a young age is the worst thing that can happen to anyone. We might think that being a royal at the time made him stronger with that stiff upper lip approach, but at such a young age losing a parent can have catastrophic consequences.

School Buildings At Risk Of Collapsing Are ‘Told To Be Prepared To Shut Down At Short Notice’

Dozens of schools that could be at risk of collapsing have reportedly been told they could be forced to close down at short notice if they’re not made safe.

Hundreds of schools across the nation were built with reinforced autoclave aerated concrete, known as RAAC, between the 1960s and 1990s, with the buildings having a life span of about 30 years.

The risk of the ‘crumbly’ concrete, which has previously been compared to a ‘chocolate Aero bar’, has been known for five years now, after a primary school in Kent partly collapsed but now chaos could be caused for thousands of more children.

Students face serious injury, or even death, at the hands of such decaying buildings that are long past their shelf life.

Documents from the Department of Education, seen by a newspaper outlet, reveal that schools impacted by the infrastructure need to prepare for the eventuality that they’re taken out of use and vacated at short notice until they’re made safe.

This could see pupils, many of whom have already had their schooling interrupted by several COVID-19 lockdowns, sent off to other schools, taught in alternative locations or forced to return to learning remotely online.

In June, a newspaper outlet reported that the total number of school buildings at risk was expected to increase significantly, referencing a Schools Week report that the DfE had told four schools, in Essex and the northeast, to shut after RAAC was discovered in their ceilings.

The report stated that Mistley Norman Church of England primary school and Hockley primary school, both in Essex, were named, along with two schools in the northeast run by the Bishop Bewick Catholic education trust.

School bosses are now being urged to come up with a plan, after being asked ‘what it would take to implement a plan ahead of the start of term’.

A report by the National Audit Office (NAO) earlier this year revealed that 700,000 children in England attend schools requiring major repairs, with more than a third of buildings being beyond their lifespan.

The watchdog said it would be focusing on the 14,000 schools that were built during the time when RAAC was used in construction.

By May, 65 out of 196 schools inspected were confirmed to have used RAAC. An additional 400 were due to be checked out of the 600 potentially impacted.

So, our schools collapse and many of our OAPs starve, yet the Tories can afford to house men, women and children who have no legal right to be here. They also seem to be able to pay some civil servants six-figure salaries, and they can afford to demolish our economy with the net zero carbon nonsense.

Honestly, if the Victorians could see us now, they’d be turning in their graves. The United Kingdom was once a proud history of industrial culture, and if this wasn’t so serious, it would be a joke.

How is it that the Victorians built schools that are still functional today, but late 20th-century architects used materials they knew would fail within their lifetime?

The point is the schools are falling apart and so is our country. What are they going to do about it, absolutely nothing. They’ll just huff and puff until the schools fall down. Moan and groan!

They clearly erected these schools with the intention of saving money, but now it’s going to cost a lot more to rebuild them.

The Fight To Keep Pizza Hut Open Has Begun

Pizza Hut faces a debt problem as people spend less on dining out due to the cost-of-living crisis while it wrestles with substantial rises in energy and food prices.

Auditors have raised fears over whether the beloved family restaurant can continue trading, while experts claimed similar debt problems are hitting other similar chains.

The US firm’s biggest British franchise, which employs 4,000 employees across 152 outlets, must repay £31 million of its £73 million of debts by April next year.

Now, it is attempting to get revised terms on debt and acknowledged it could breach its banking covenants later this year in a ‘severe but plausible downside scenario’.

But bosses at Pizza Hut UK – which is the dining franchise and does not include the delivery or takeaway arms – have denied the chain is in danger and insisted ‘constructive’ refinancing discussions are anticipated to be concluded by the end of this year.

It comes amid continuing fears for the fate of UK high streets, with the British Retail Consortium revealing last month that 6,000 shops have closed in the last five years and the overall vacancy rate has increased since the beginning of the year.

Sophie Lund-Yates, lead equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said Pizza Hut UK outlets had also been affected by their locations in shopping centres or near offices.

She told a newspaper outlet that Pizza Hut is in a very difficult position and that the cost of living crisis has heaped a huge amount of pressure on restaurant chains, especially those who’ve taken on an onerous amount of debt.

She said that unfortunately, it’s increasingly looking like Pizza Hut is within this camp and is the latest victim in the cohort of companies that are being stung by higher interest rates, which makes repayments on fat loans a painful reality.

Pizza Hut restaurants are also frequently located in shopping centres or near offices, which are areas that have seen footfall decline since the pandemic, which when coupled with the fact that consumers have less money in their pocket, creates a potent and challenging problem even more difficult.

The facts surrounding the Pizza Hut developments are rather thin on the ground, as is something that will definitely be observed closely by fans of the chain.

Pizza Hut UK is being charged interest on its debt of up to 14 per cent and has posted an operating loss for the past two years, including £16.5 million last year.

Unfortunately, Pizza Hut is extremely costly. Their prices are not reasonable at all. If they didn’t charge so much for their Pizza’s because they’re greedy they might not be in so much trouble now. The quality isn’t too bad, but at the end of the day it’s junk food, and there are numerous other places that are much better for less.

Remember it’s just a pile of dough that you’re eating, along with perhaps a drink and a dessert and that it’s going to come to about £30 or more, and don’t forget you have to add the delivery fee as well.

They’re way overpriced and in some places, they won’t accept cash. I mean, who’s going to miss that? Pizza Hut is way overpriced and has been since it opened, but the cost of living crisis has definitely not helped these businesses and other smaller takeaways as well, and soon they will be a thing of the past, and then everyone will have to cook at home, instead of taking the easy way out and just ordering online.

Pizza is so inexpensive to make at home, and even with decent quality toppings, it’s still more affordable to make it at home. The problem is, there are a lot of youngsters these days who simply don’t know how to cook.

As ULEZ Expansion Comes Into Force, Sadiq Khan Ignores Fury Of Londoners

Sadiq Khan dismissed outrage from Londoners and increased Labour alarm today as the ULEZ expansion came into force.

In a bruising round of discussions this morning, the mayor denied that expanding the ultra-low emission zone across the capital was an ‘anti car’ money-raising exercise.

He shrugged off fears from allies of Sir Keir Starmer about the political consequences of imposing the £12.50 a day levy so widely, insisting people want to see their leaders taking aggressive action.

But Sadiq Khan did attempt to suppress a fresh row by denying that he would bring in a pay-per-mile scheme for motorists during his time at City Hall, despite the emergence of documents revealing it has been considered.

Transport Secretary Mark Harper said he would have blocked the ULEZ plan if he had the power.

The bulk of Greater London is covered by the £12.50 a day levy from today.

It hits petrol vehicles introduced before 2005 that are not compliant with Euro 4 emissions regulations.

Meanwhile, diesel cars and vans are only exempt if their engine complies with more recent Euro 6 rules, which were introduced in September 2015.

This will snare popular vans registered before the cut-off date including Ford Transit Custom 310s.

Sir Keir Starmer has been attempting to estrange himself from the policy since it was blamed for Labour’s failure to win the Uxbridge & South Ruislip by-election, triggered by Boris Johnson’s resignation from the Commons.

Senior Labour figures fear that outrage at the policy could cost the party key outer London seats in the general election next year.

But Sadiq Khan told Times Radio that the policy to clean the air in London was not anti-car or anti-motorist.

He said that the good news was actually that nine out of 10 cars seen driving in outer London on an average day were already compliant, so there was no additional fee for them to pay, no restrictions on them, yet they could benefit from the clean air.

He also said that he accepted that there were a small number of cars that would be affected, they’re non-compliant cars, and that they themselves, the drivers, breathe in pollutants, and that’s why he’s announced that every single driver in London of a car or motorbike, every small business with a van, every charity with a minibus, will receive financial support (for scrapping non-compliant vehicles).

Sadiq Khan is targeting the poorest in society, and he knows precisely what he’s doing. He’s not really telling us the truth because how can paying £12.50 a day improve air quality if old cars are still on the roads?

ULEZ zones are spreading like cancer, and are we actually supposed to accept this foolery that they’re for ‘cleaner air’?

Sadiq Khan has spent billions on something that will be made redundant eventually because of the Government’s own electric car agenda.

Don’t be deceived, these cameras are for the next phase which is pay per mile, and this is also a way to remove all your freedoms once and for all.

Surely, Sadiq Khan shouldn’t have the right to do this, especially without proper consultation from the public, and I really can’t see any justification to do this. I also can’t see any justification for having a Mayor, what’s the point?

If Sadiq Khan was actually that worried about air quality, then why not take old cars off the roads and replace them with electric vehicles? Yes, that’s right, REPLACE, not sell them to people.

At Least 500 UK Flights Were Cancelled By Air Traffic Chaos

As many as 80 per cent of flights leaving the United Kingdom were postponed following a massive failure of the national air traffic control system, causing confusion for tens of thousands of holidaymakers on one of the busiest days of the year. 

Britain’s National Air Traffic Services (NATS) said it was experiencing technical issues that had forced controllers to switch from an automatic system for landing and dispatching flights to a manual one.

They said that flight plans were being input manually which meant that they couldn’t process them at the same volume, hence they had to apply traffic flow restrictions, and a spokesman told a newspaper outlet that there was nothing to suggest a cyber attack.

The majority (78 per cent) of flights leaving Heathrow are presently delayed according to Flight Radar data from 1.45 pm, compared to 74 per cent at Gatwick, 81 per cent at Manchester and 86 per cent at Bristol.

According to an analysis carried out by Cirium, 232 flights have been cancelled departing UK airports so far, equivalent to around 8 per cent of all departures.

Meanwhile, 271 flights have been cancelled coming into UK airports so far, equivalent to about 9 per cent of all arrivals.

Britons returning from Tenerife told a newspaper outlet they’d been told to expect a wait of at least 12 hours.

Michele Robson, who used to work in air traffic control, said that it was unusual for failures to last this long. As a result, nobody really knows at this point how long it’s going to take.

Travel expert Simon Calder said the issue would cause misery but added that holidaymakers should assume their flight was operating normally unless they were told otherwise.

Contagion from the issue has already dispersed across Europe, causing delays for some flights departing the Continent for the USA.

TV presenter Gabby Logan said she’s been left stranded on the runway at Budapest Airport while returning from the World Athletics Championships. She wrote that after almost 3 weeks away from home she was hours from hugging her family, and had been told that UK airspace was shut and that they could be there for 12 hours and that they had to sit on the plane and wait.

NATS didn’t supply any additional details about what had caused it or how long it would take for UK airspace to return to normal.

The more I read these reports, the more I wonder about people, particularly ones with children, dragging them off abroad to all kinds of harsh travel. Why doesn’t everybody holiday at home in the United Kingdom? Then they can put some money back into the economy and appreciate the beauty that’s all over our own country.

Next, they’ll be telling you that digital ID, passports and a cashless society are the answer, but clearly, it’s not.

Prince Philip Was Startled When He Saw Servants Arrive To Take Care Of Just One Guest – Him! – His Horror Was Overwhelming

It’s by no means unusual for a new broom to sweep away the excesses of the past or attempt to, and King Charles isn’t the first senior figure to voice concern at the size and complexity of the Royal Household.

Prince Philip was definitely aware of how many people it took to run the larger royal residences and said so.

There was a time when Prince Philip had a few days free and thought it would be a good idea to spend them at Sandringham. He hadn’t even settled in when he looked out of the window and observed a busload of staff arriving, from telephonists to cooks, all needed to run the Big House for the few days he would be there.

He was horrified. Fortunately, Wood Farm became vacant shortly thereafter. (This was the house where Prince John, uncle to the late Queen’s father, George VI, had lived until his demise in 1919).

It was much smaller and could be run with a skeleton staff. So, from then on, that’s where he and the Queen tended to visit, except when they opened Sandringham House for family parties at Christmas or in the summer.

Wood Farm is where Prince Philip lived in retirement between 2017 and 2020.

However frustrated he might have been with the extensive entourage, and perhaps, the flummery involved, Prince Philip was not the monarch. Now his son Charles is flexing his muscles and no doubt change will soon ensue.

According to a newspaper outlet, the King is fed up with hearing ‘this is how it was done in the Queen’s reign’.

He’s identified that sometimes the same job is done repeatedly when it only needs to be done once and that if a maid attends to a room, should her work really be checked by three others?

It’s suggested that the King intends to tighten the ship, decrease the number of those employed and instead pay fewer people better wages.

It’s more than understandable that Queen Elizabeth II ran things in her own particular way and equally understandable that the King will wish to do some reorganising.

Quite rightly the Queen ran her household along established lines and no one could possibly accuse her of being personally extravagant. She was significantly different from the Queen Mother who ran her court in an extravagantly Edwardian way.

I’m not suggesting that we should cut the Royal Household to the bone, but if they want all that staff they should at least pay for it out of their own money because they should pay their own way for some things. The rest of the country has to pay for everything out of their own money, so why shouldn’t they?

Like it or not though, they do bring a lot of revenue to this country through tourism.

However, is this the same Prince Philip, who acquired such immense wealth during his marriage, that the terms of his will were not open to the public? Is this the same Prince Philip who whined about a lack of funds and a fear that he might have to sell his polo ponies?

Is this the same Prince Philip who insisted on receiving a taxpayer-funded allowance while married to the Queen? The same Prince Philip who didn’t think that his family should be paying inheritance tax or income tax and only under duress came to a voluntary agreement for the payment of income tax?

Yes, that’s him, the same one.

A Family Of Eight Forced To Live In A One-Bed Council Flat

A family of eight, including seven children all under the age of 16, have been forced to live in a cramped one-bed council flat.

Cheryl Shaw and her six children have been living in the mould and damp-ridden property in Oldham, Greater Manchester, since last year. The property was originally given to her when she was pregnant with her youngest child, Laila, who’s now two years old.

It was intended for just them, but due to circumstances beyond her control, last year Cheryl had to take in her other six children.

A newspaper outlet reported that each morning, Cheryl Shaw wakes up and clears her living room floor of the makeshift bed that she and three of her children are forced to sleep on so they can use the little space there is to play.

Behind the sofa is used as storage space for clothes because there’s nowhere else for it to go, and despite lodging multiple complaints about the cramped and mouldy conditions, Cheryl said that she’s never had anybody come out to see the flat.

Now Cheryl is at breaking point, fearing for the safety of her children and has been pleading with Oldham Council for more space.

Cheryl claims both she and her social worker have begged Oldham Council and First Choice Homes (FCHO), who manage the property, for more suitable accommodation, but their pleas have been denied.

She said that she’s trying to fight and that she’s doing everything everybody asks of her, but that her children can’t sleep properly and the situation is awful.

Then the council told the M.E.N that no five-bed socially rented properties have been available in the area since July 2021. Cheryl claims she’s been advised to move further out of Manchester for a better chance of successfully bidding on a bigger flat, but that would mean she would have to upheaval her children’s schooling because they would have to change schools, and would interrupt their education.

She also feels that moving away from her family and support network would be setting her up to fail.

She said that even if they gave her a three-bedroom she could make it work and that she just wants them to give her a property suitable for her and her children.

This mother is presently paying £389 per month for a mouldy property which is rented out to her by her council. They have a duty of care to put the property right, and if they can’t do this, then they should be rehousing her. They are refusing to do anything and therefore have failed their duty of care.

Cheryl continued that the children have always got coughs and colds and that the dampness worries her. That it’s just horrible and that she has to have clothes around the back of her settee because she doesn’t have anywhere else to put them, and that First Choice Homes knows all about the mould.

A social landlord is a housing association or council that provides social housing in the United Kingdom. They have a duty to keep the property in a good state of repair as well as an ongoing responsibility for the tenant’s welfare.

The Defective Premises Act 1972 says that your landlord owes you a certain duty of care that is set out in this Act. They include a duty to prevent personal injury or damage to the property caused by defects in your home. This duty is owed to anyone, members of your family, and also visitors to your home.

As a landlord, they must keep your rented property safe and free from health hazards.

So, what is considered an uninhabitable living situation for a tenant in the United Kingdom? A property is unfit for human occupancy if living there could cause you or anyone else in your household serious harm, for example, issues with dampness.

It’s true, we do have a serious problem with overcrowding, due to there being not enough housing stock and this isn’t just in Greater Manchester, it’s going on all over the country.

This problem is getting absurd, but councils are happy enough to have hotels closed down for illegals coming into the United Kingdom, but not our own who were born and bred here, and the situation is appalling.

Building more homes appears to be a concern as well because there are not enough places to build them and so they’re being built on every piece of green land we have, so the United Kingdom is becoming a concrete jungle.

Prefab housing was a wonderful idea after World War II. It would allow many British people the housing that they needed, and they could be built to house however big the family was, but again we have to have the space to put them.

There are numerous golf courses that we probably don’t need. It’s excellent for the golfers but needs must, and prefabs would fit perfectly on this land, and it’s the perfect solution for the British people, so Sir Keir Starmer, if you want to do something productive for the British people who are in this dire situation, please bring this matter up in the House of Commons because we have numerous people who are in dire need of housing, right now!

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started