THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Another Expenses Scandal

MP’s are claiming fuel allowances and, it’s deplorable. They have free housing, free food, alcohol, gym membership, the catalogue of things are limitless.

What about the poor, the sick, the disabled, old and, people of no fixed address?

80,000 children will be homeless at Christmas and the rest of the year. They don’t have the grandeur of one home, let alone two and, as for MP’s claiming for energy when the rest of the nation has 10% increases is completely nauseating, as we all freeze while they snigger all the way to the bank.

The disabled are at death’s door in their thousands following being established suitable for work. They’re being denied benefits and; there will be additional loss of life to come in the following winter months.

The old are being intimidated with the misplacement of their Winter Fuel Payment should the Conservatives be in control in 2015. They can hardly cope on a state pension as it is.

The communal poor must pick between heating or eating and, those unfortunate enough to be sanctioned, they can’t do either.

The expenditure disgrace has done nothing to put an end to MP’s continuing to sponge and thieve from the taxpayer. Whether working or not we’re all paying our dues on each thing we buy, as well as PAYE and NI contributions.

The MP’s take, take, take with no feeling for the people they’re rumoured to serve. They oppress and break the law, they exaggerate and deceive the people and, get away with it.

Iain Duncan Smith tells lies in parliament and, gets away with it every time. Grant Shapps has different pseudonyms and dodgy business methods and, the police don’t bring legal proceeding against him.

The energy disaster is the last straw. This country isn’t just and fair and, MP’s will carry on taking freedoms away from us, along with our good natures for as long as they see fit.

One day the tables will be compelled to turn and, we must purge ourselves of self serving fools, rather than serving them.

In 2009 there was a major expenses scandal, which exposed members of the United Kingdom Parliament. There was public outrage because of the actual and so-called abuse of the authorised allowances and expenses claimed by Members of Parliament.

Yet we’re now in 2013 and, it’s still going on under our very own eyes and, people are permitting this to happen, they’re all walking about with blinkers on their eyes, like they’re in some sort of stasis.

The political expenses scandal in 2009 ended in a huge number of people standing down, sackings, de-selections and retirement announcements, together with official expressions of regret and, the reimbursement of expenses.

Various members or previous members of the House of Commons and members of the House of Lords, were taken to court and sentenced to periods of imprisonment.

Yet we all appear to consider it adequate that members of parliament are now extracting money from the poor to give to the wealthy and, funding their exorbitant way of life from the honest taxpayer and, not only that, they are getting away with it.

In the United Kingdom MPs can claim expenses, comprising the cost of accommodation, that are entirely, exclusively and, as a result incurred for the functioning of a Member’s governmental obligations.

In February 2008 a Freedom of Information Act request for the liberation of particulars of MPs’ expenses claims was permitted by an Information Tribunal.

In May 2008, the High Court in England and Wales decreed approval of liberating the particulars of MPs’ expenses claims and, in April 2009 House of Commons officials made known that publication of expenses, with particular details considered overly delicate, to be removed, would be made in July 2009.

Nevertheless prior to this taking place, a full uncut transcript of the expenses records and documentation was disclosed to the Daily Telegraph, which started issuing particulars in day-to-day instalments from 8 May 2009.

If this could occur then, it can take place now and, those MPs who are squandering the taxpayers money haphazardly are like a lethal disease spreading, but looking as if they are giving us charity and, doing us a good turn.

It’s not a ‘gentleman’s club’ for MPs and, there should be a strict cutting-edge control on how to prevent misuse of pay and expense process and, there should be agreed radical plans on how to implement this.

We can’t turn a blind eye to this misuse of trust inside the government and, it should be abolished at once, directives should not be damaged, particularly by a government that we’re supposed to put one’s trust in the most, when they’re supervising our nation.

Westminster can’t operate like some gentlemen’s club where the subscribers of that club make up the directives and run it jointly themselves and, if MPs carry on setting their own codes and rules, our country will consistently dispute its transparency and, quality that they rightly demand.

The conduct of some MPs is completely unsatisfactory and, particular MPs should be forced to stand down and, there should be an immediate general election.

Members of Parliament appear to think it is their entitlement to claim for furniture, gardening, cleaning and stamp duty on house purchases, as well as acquiring second homes and, then some, all of this, will not reinstate the people’s confidence in our political system.

Our political system needs to be changed and, looked into more seriously. There needs to be reorganisation, so that the citizens of the United Kingdom can have more confidence and pride in their elected Members of Parliament and, these suggested alterations should be relevant to the House of Lords, as well as the House of Commons.

Cancer Payments: Terminally Ill Man On Months Of Delays

A terminally sick man has been made to feel humiliated after being handed a food bank voucher surrounded by delays to his benefit payments.

After the man was identified with having terminal cancer, he filled in the relevant forms, yet for three months was given no money at all.

His story was highlighted by the nonprofit organisation Macmillan Cancer Support, who said patients are having to wait weeks, or even months, to have their payments processed, even though The Department for Work and Pensions has raised questions over the robustness of the charities data.

The man had gone to his doctor after a diagnosis and treatment proceeded incredibly fast. They did an internal scan on the 23rd May and, on the same day they found that he had lower bowel cancer and, on the 24th May, doctors removed 90% of his lower bowel.

He was then contacted by the hospital on the 13th June, to give him the news that regrettably it was incurable and, it had gone to his liver, his stomach and, one or two other parts of his body.

The doctors preferred not to talk about how long he had to live, they said it could be 2 years, they said it could be 5 years; it could be whatever it took, the doctors said they didn’t like to set boundaries on it.

As an outcome of his illness, he made a claim for a Personal Independence payment and, for an individual who is suffering from a terminal illness, payments for PIPs should be exercised pretty swiftly.

The man’s doctor issued a DS1500 form, which the man had been informed since, makes your claim a priority with the PIPs department. The man filled in all the forms and, they went in the week of the 17th June and, then the man heard nothing from the PIPs department.

Macmillan began chasing it up and, they were informed it was with the decision makers. Even Citizens Advice pursued the PIPs department and, they were informed it was with the decision makers, everyone was told the same thing.

And when Macmillan head office got involved and, began talking to people, it turned out that it had at no time been with the decision makers, it was sat on a desk doing nothing. When the man found out what was really going on, it made him extremely distressed.

At the Citizens Advice Office they had got so frustrated because everyone they spoke to, told them the same thing, ‘We can’t do anything, it’s with the decision makers’.

A woman came back into the room and, handed the man a red piece of paper to take round to a food bank, so that himself and his partner could be issued with some food and, the man felt so ashamed because all he could get off anyone was a voucher for a food bank.

When he actually got the payment on the 10th September, they rewarded him the money owing, which was backdated to the 13th June and, something else the DWP kept saying, ‘Was don’t worry, it’s all backdated’, but it was three months this man had to remain in poverty prior to seeing any of his money.

The man said, ‘That every time you spoke to somebody on the phone, you felt like they were waiting for you to die before they did anything’.

‘You felt because the doctors wouldn’t set a time limit on it, which they simply don’t these days, that the DWP are just waiting to see what the outcome is’ and, when the man mentioned that to a person at PIPs he said, ‘Oh, no no, even if you die, the payment will be made’. And saying something like that doesn’t help because the person feels deceived.

The man’s consultant had said to go out and, for him to enjoy himself, but how do you enjoy yourself when you’re not getting what you’re entitled to?

The man was given an apology for the way that his case was handled and, he received some recompense about £150, but Macmillan believes that there are hundreds of terminally ill patients who are being affected and, this additional obstruction in benefits is coming up time and time again, because the system had been altered , but it was still the case that those who were priority, or anyone that was identified with a terminal illness this ‘special rule’ claim, that they should really have their money dealt with extremely swiftly, just to make their life as trouble-free as possible.

The idea of a ‘fast track’ process for terminally ill patients who are in need of the money urgently, because they clearly don’t have as long as the rest of us to live is still there, but the reality that the process has gone from 8 to 10 days to 8 to 10 weeks in fact is shocking and, we see from this man’s story, the anguish that causes.

The structure of the way things work was only altered in April, but are these teething problems going to settle down, are we going to see any indication that things are working better now? Sadly not and, Macmillan are talking to the DWP and, they’re working with them to obtain a resolution to make the process work more swiftly, but the level of alterations, like removing the old methods that used to be very straightforward to fill in and, posted through and, replacing them with lengthy phone calls, these things add to the hinderance and, plainly Macmillan don’t comprehend why the department wants to have a process that sadly takes so long.

The DWP was asked if they would do an interview and, they refused, but they said that Macmillan’s data wasn’t reliable on how many cases there are and, that Macmillan are not comparing ‘like with like’, there are differing benefits and different claim procedures.

Yet the idea is precisely the same, the predecessor benefit Disability Living Allowance had a ‘fast track’ process. The replacement benefit Personal Independence Payment has a ‘fast track’ process as well, so in that case the idea that has been talked about would be identical.

So, could it be believable that Ministers sat down and took the choice that terminally ill patients would have to wait 2 months for a benefit that they qualify to and, there’s plainly a bureaucratic mess up somewhere in the system and, one that they don’t have a grip on and, are not getting a grip on because there clearly is no commitment on what the timescale should be and, if it’s more complicated and, it takes a little more than 8 to 10 days, then perhaps that’s all right, but not when it’s 8 to 10 weeks.

Start Booking Your Ambulance In Advance!

Has anybody had to call for an ambulance recently, well if they have, the waiting time for an ambulance is now up to a four hour waiting period and, by the time you’ve had to wait you could have passed away.

I was in extremely identical circumstance a few weeks ago when I was at my sister’s house paying her a visit and, I became unwell. I suffer badly with Crohn’s disease and, I was fine when I left my residence, which is ten minutes down the street, but when I got to my sisters I began to feel extremely unwell and, was after some time crying out in agony.

My sister called for an ambulance and was informed that an ambulance would be there, but it wouldn’t be with the two’s and blues, which I didn’t expect, but I did expect them to turn up inside the hour.

An hour went passed, and someone telephoned and talked to my sister and, said that the ambulance was about a mile away from us, so not to panic. One more hour later I was still waiting.

In-between waiting, my sister had managed to get my nephew to go to my home and, get some of my medication, which I had taken, but because I had begun to loose blood an ambulance was called in the first place.

Two and a half hours following the first phone call for an ambulance, someone called to say that they were sorry, but they wasn’t sure when the ambulance would get to me. By this time, the pain had abated enough so that I could manage to get home and, even though the bleeding had not stopped, it had let up a little, sufficient that I could make it home and, get into bed with a hot water bottle, take some additional medication and rest.

I was still unwell the next day and, I was still in pain, even though the bleeding had stopped; I should’ve been seen in A&E to have blood tests done to see if I had an infection that had sourced my flare up.

I’m very distressed at the time it takes for the ambulance service to get to people who are clearly in a lot of pain and suffering, especially the elderly, young children and the disabled, but more to the point a human being in general.

It appears to be the criteria these days that it in fact doesn’t matter how much suffering another human being is in, it appears to be immaterial, or more to the point, the communication expertise of the individual on the other end of the telephone, who is reading off a sheet of paper with suggestions, telling them if you in fact require an ambulance or not and, if those guidelines state that you don’t, then essentially you can get lost and die.

If they want to make short the life that one lives, then why have an ambulance service in the first place, particularly if they can’t get there in time. There should be no suggestions on who gets an ambulance and who doesn’t, if you’re unwell then you are sick. As the patient, you have no idea what’s wrong with you, it might not be dangerous, but unless you’re seen by a professional, how are we supposed to know, not unless of course, we have a crystal ball stuck permanently up our rectum and, in that case, it unquestionably would be dangerous and, need an ambulance.

To be honest, our healthcare system has become the most shameful profession. Once upon a time you could talk about the medical profession with pride, but now it’s grown into an industry with a large amount of difficulties.

I call it an industry because that’s what it has grown into and, what a predicament it’s in as it delights itself with not helping the recuperation of people that are sick, but with the intentional demise of human beings.

For it’s far less costly to see human beings die, than to pay out more funds than is required for the living and, if you believe that the health care system is there for the living, then maybe it’s my skepticism that should be in question and not yours.

When I read of a Grandmother that died in pain after waiting four hours for an ambulance to turn up, it definitely puts uncertainty in our health service and, that someone should be seriously examining what’s really going on, rather than skimming above the surface of things and, making as if that we know what’s going on.

What somebody or someone does will at all times have repercussions, in this instance, this poor Grandmother died, which means that while this poor woman waited and, suffered while waiting for an ambulance, the person on the other end of the phone failed to look after her while she waited.

Bearing in mind when reading this article that you can skim over it as you desire, but remember this, at some time this could be your Grandmother, Son, or Daughter waiting for an ambulance in agony and, if you don’t want a more superior health service, then please feel free to skim over this article, but remember, one day this could be you!

Tories Turn Down Nick Clegg’s ‘Free Schools’ Remark

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said that schools should recruit only credentialed educationalists and; that they should stick to the national curriculum.

Nevertheless, the national curriculum is there only to ‘dumb down’ children in the education network. The syllabus will be composed of an unlimited catalog of spelling, facts and rules, that will not help to expand the child’s capacity to think or resolve problems.

Children will be enforced to learn a range of detail for English, maths and science without comprehending it. A lot of the curricula will demand too much too young and, this will put stress on teachers to rely on mechanical studying without the understanding of it.

These unsuitable demands will lead the way to lack of success and demoralisation. Nonetheless, this is what the government desire because if they can dumb down the children, in the end they will not be intelligent enough to attack the system.

The recently developed curriculum comprises a strategy for students to remember their times tables up to 12 by the age of nine, multiply and divide fractions by the age of 11, as well as acquire knowledge of subjects such as geometry, long division and multiplication and decimals.

This would be excellent for a number of children, but the rest will fall by the wayside because they clearly will not be fast enough to keep up, or they will simply not be able to do it because of their ages.

This has in fact been going on for years, but at present the government are raising the stakes so that the extremely intelligent will get the instruction that is obtainable in a very short time, which means that the other pupils they can throw to the wayside, leaving them illiterate and demoralised because their brains were not advanced enough to manage this inflexible system.

Nick Clegg said that it was so that parents could be sure their children were being given a high standard of education, but of course that is not the case in almost all children.

Almost all schools work well without being made to employ qualified educators and, have done so for some time. It would as well be good to give schools certain liberties because it’s not the government that are in charge of the schools and, teaching of the children, it’s the teachers that teach these children, so as a result they should be in charge of whom they employ and fire, so long as they’re evaluated first.

They should as well be allowed to hire voluntary teachers who are prepared to work in their free time for free as supply teachers, particularly when educating the disabled and, special education units in mainstream educational institutions.

That does not mean that those who are out-of-work should be assembled to work in schools for their benefits, this would be absurd, but maybe people who have disabled children at school and they want to contribute during school hours to others who need further assistance.

There should be a lot more free schools that have been set up by parents and other groups, but that are operated outside local authority control because free schools have discretion over what they teach.

Nick Clegg might be wondering what the purpose of having a national curriculum is when really he knows what the purpose of having it is, the purpose of having a national curriculum is so that the government can control the masses in a very small space and time.

In schools we have a peer group pressure where they subdue uncertainty and opposition to new ideas by utilising the need to belong and, accelerate acceptance of new lifestyles by constantly condemning previous ways of thinking.

Installing subconscious communication by stressing certain code words or idioms in lengthy, bewildering speeches and, attaining the loss of ability to assess logically by stopping personal examination.

Detaching originality by demanding conformity to the group clothing regulations. Producing disorientation and enlarged susceptibility to emotional arousal by stripping the brain of required nutrients used through the use of school meals.

There are certain ideas of re-education: repetition, going through the same subject over and over until it’s known by heart. The subjects (pupils) are at no time left alone, or given any private time of their own, they are always in activity.

We’re educated to think that it’s an education we’re permitting our children to have, but in fact it’s an indoctrination. Simply mind control in schools.

It’s the intentional dumbing down of our children by design. It’s about government control and, it’s not about teaching children.

Brainwashing is about mildly applied psychological operations and, education in all likelihood is the most trouble-free way for them to do that.

The education our children are going to get has nothing to do with education, it’s teaching our children to be human resources because that’s the way that the government talk about us, to spin off financial gain for the globalists.

In addition the aim of state instruction is not to spread insight to all, it’s only to reduce as many individuals as feasible to the same safe level, to reproduce a standard citizenry and, to put down dissent and inventiveness.

The most considerable barricade to discovery is not ignorance, it’s the misapprehension of understanding and, that’s what the 15,000 hours and, obligatory schooling trains and conditions us and, you’re told particular realities and, so you assume you know all that’s going on and, it’s not until later on in life when you might come across additional particulars that you perceive what’s going on.

So until you have this other bit of information to bring everything into focus, you understand that what you were taught in state education throughout that 15,000 hours, was really was what was going on and, it’s not until you pump up against the real world, as George Orwell said, usually on the field of battle, that you have to contemplate that at which you were taught to believe, against the impartial proof that exists.

Do we in fact need to send our children to school, not that I’m saying it’s not necessary to teach our children, what I’m talking about is the regimented practice of mandatory or enforced schooling through a politically manipulated structure that is more designed to keep society, which begins with children, dumbed down, lacking the knowledge of either inventive or reasoned thought, or productive living, or any real consciousness of the real world.

John Taylor Gatto was a prize-winning teacher in New York who took children that couldn’t even read or write, who were headed for jail and made them into the highest level students.

In addition he then found out that he had been closed down by the substantial tax free infrastructure, so that he couldn’t teach these children this information. He found that by design they were dumbing people down to make them submissive biotic robots or replicants, that’s what we’re seen as, but now we’re outdated, we’re to be phased out.

I don’t believe you have to be a fortune teller to notice that what we call education is really not intended to better the lives of the children, their families and, society in general.

The motive of education, founded on observation and, the observation of others is to suppress humankind, to produce robotic clones that are purely cogs in the wheel and, they only know how to do their little job that they have been given to do, to prevent people from having self determination, to put down dissent and ingenuity.

Look at the great politicians and, other great men of the past, such as Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin. These people at no time graduated from a conventional secondary school, even though they were educated to a high standard.

By the age of about 13 to 15 almost all children were not even contemplated as children any longer and, were treated almost like grown-ups. They could read, write and, were well-informed about the arts and sciences.

They didn’t need new maths and, they could read all the finest written works, because their expertise in maths and language arts were in general far superior to our own today.

The purpose of education in the public sector should be to extend insight to all, so that they can have a more excellent life and share that understanding with others so that we can all work with each other to have a better society.

Yet evidence appears to shows that in state schools it is doing just the opposite and, it becomes visible that this is not by misadventure, but by design.

Any teacher who is caught actually trying to teach children through avoidance or divergence from the official curriculum will frequently be condemned, harassed and, in the end fired from their work.

View it this way, if you were positioned in charge of running the business of some large company and, you were a liar and a thief, but you couldn’t run it all by yourself and had to employ people to help you in running the equipment, would you want to use people who were generally honest, good with critical thinking skills, good with mathematics and, had a good ability to remember, of course not and, if you did, then they might get wise to your racket and turn you into the authorities.

Now apply what I just said on a public and even a global plane.

What if leaders of our countries beat the drums of war from time to time and brandished the patriotic flag with self serving allusions to keeping safe our liberties, when all along it’s simply an enormous trick.

Do you believe they would have an interest in keeping the people dumbed down.

On Star Trek they had an adversary called the BORG, a cube like construction that was a combination of human and machine. Their favourite proverb was resistance is futile and, you will be assimilated.

Is it just me, or is this a somewhat camouflaged allusion to our own present day society?

Following the establishment of the Outcome Based Education in the 1960s, the change from time-honoured schooling to the quantum disorder we have at the moment have gone into full assembly.

Following that period the centre of education would at all times be on the importance of the group and not the individual, so that we could all be very proficient or cogs in the wheel and, recently the No Child Left Behind agenda was devised on a national level.

Let me describe what that in fact means in layman’s terms. If some children get behind in particular areas, the educator has to stop teaching the more advanced learners and centre on those that are having difficulties.

While this may appear noble, the outcome is that the more advanced scholars are held back and, stopped from standing out as they should be allowed to do. So what is the real message of No Child Left Behind.

The real message is this, they can’t afford to permit any child to slid through the crack and, in fact become completely literate. If such a child were to in fact shine past the low level reflective expertise that they in fact want to see developed, then the child could present a difficult situation to them in time and, reveal their immense and grotesque scheme for what it actually is.

What they in fact want us to have is a restricted and, extremely centred education, that only educated us how to do a few particular things. That way, we will at no time be able to get the greater picture of what is actually going on and, so when we need something we will continually have to be contingent on their professionals to help us fix those things that we can’t mend and, keep us forever contingent upon that construction of social slavery.

George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, we need not wait for the future fulfilment of these legendary tales, for we have already arrived.

The Re-Emergence Of Complete Destitution in Britain

Something dreadful is steadily occurring across the face of Great Britain. We’re noticing the return of total levels of poverty which has not happened on this scale since the Victorial age over a century ago.

Relative poverty is when people can’t pay for the luxury and pleasures which nearly all people have, but complete poverty is when people haven’t the cash to pay for even their most fundamental requirements and, the proof is everywhere.

There are at the moment over 300 food banks in Great Britain and, the figures are soaring each week. The Red Cross is establishing centres to assist the poor, just as they do in developing nations.

Research published shows that even in thriving regions of the country like London, more than a quarter of its inhabitants are presently living in poverty.

In addition, a new alarming reality is steadily surfacing; a growing number of these poverty households are not contingent on benefits, but where someone is at work.

In the north the first of the Northern Housing Consortium’s surveys just published, presents a destructive picture. It’s based on 74 households, a tiny specimen but one which generally reflects all households living in the social rented sector.

It discloses that two thirds, after paying for rent and food and, other necessary bills, ends up each week with less than £10, whilst more than a third end up with nothing at all.

A quarter can only pay £20 or less on food per week, how many of the rest of us could sustain oneself on that? Four fifths of them are in financial debt and, small levels of financial debt.

Some of the responses from people are heartbreaking. The system is unsympathetic and, people work all their lives and, since work is so hard to obtain, people have to take anything that they can in order to make money to sustain oneself.

If a person was offered three days work, commencing the next day and, did those three days work and, then went to the jobcentre to inform them that they had been paid three days money, they would be fined for not telling them earlier, but of course that person couldn’t have told them sooner because the job was the next day and, there had not been enough time because they had to start so early in the morning.

If a person put a new claim in for benefits and, then received a further three days work it would jumble up all their benefits, and they would get fined each time.

They would have their money stopped, which would means that they would have to dispose and sell things that they had in all likelihood got while being employed just to pay for the bedroom tax and council tax and, eventually all the nice items that they received while working, they would have nothing left, so how can this be fair when all they’re doing is finding work in-between applying for benefits when they’re not in gainful employment.

What makes this so gratuitously brutal for the injured party is that it’s not even necessary. There is suffering that is being imposed on claimants to save the government money, yet the budget deficit is not diminishing.

One Million Public Sector Positions To Disappear Beneath Coalition Expenditure Cuts Prior To Next Election

One million public sector jobs will have disappeared beneath the Tory led Coalition’s spending cuts prior to the next general election, an investigation divulges.

Since the Government came to power in 2010, the entire 631,000 public sector jobs have been cut. More than half of them in the local Town Halls.

Together with the Government’s own predictions forecasts an additional 400,000 job casualties prior to the 2015 General Election which means by then one in six public sector jobs will have been cut.

A study by the GMB union manifests proof of accelerating cutbacks as councils draw up their budget surveys for next year and, advises that a great deal of communities in some of the most disadvantaged regions will discover their local finances in shreds.

Some parts of the country that are most reliant on the public sector to help their local resources have been hardest hit and; there is further disaster to come.

And even a leading Tory sounded the alarm bells that the cuts are already striking daily amenities, such as meals on wheels for the elderly, street cleaning and repairing potholes.

Local government has taken the most intense cuts in the public sector and, in spite of the councils best attempts on daily services, services are beginning to suffer.

They’re only midway through a 43% cut in the council’s central funding and, the effect on services is only going to get more difficult over the following few years.

Unless local government finances are put on a sustainable foothold, amenities like road maintenance, leisure amenities and, business support projects are going to suffer considerably and, some amenities will probably be wound down entirely by the end of the decade.

Since the Tory led Coalition came into control, local government has carried the full force of public sector cuts by shedding 360,000 jobs in reaction to a 42% cut to councils’ central finances, preserving the Government more than £3.1 billion.

A GMB examination of official Government figures demonstrates that out of the 631,000 job cuts, some sections of high employment have been hardest hit.

The North East saw 41,000 jobs go, a 13.8% decrease compared with an 8% drop, 58,000 jobs, in the South East.

The union has recognised that 20 councils has already organised very bad cuts in finances and services next year. They comprise Derbyshire, where Labour leader Anne Western has warned of 1,600 job deficits and, is looking for saving of £47.2 million and, Cornwall which intends to cut £196 million by 2019 on top of the £170 million saved since 2010.

The Civil servants’ Public and Commercial Services union established that nine out of 10 members who lost their livelihoods last year were from low-ranking paid grades.

Official statistics show that 13,030 (86%) of the 15,140 civil service job cuts between March 2010 and March 2013 were from administrative groups. Since 2010, more than 78,600 civil service positions have been cut, comprising 48,200 administrative workers.

This government lied to people when it said the frontline would be in safe hands, as these statistics plainly show the lowest paid employees who keep departments ticking over have been the hardest hit.

It additionally shows that when the government state that there are more than sufficient jobs out there, that they’re also untruthful about that and, if the government can’t at least be honest, they may as well not speak at all.

The government are the most dishonest and, they trifle with the publics feelings and, it’s virtually heart-rending in the view of the fact that they’re causing so many people pain and torment.

It’s not a magnificent existence living in the United Kingdom, with all of it’s floundering, negligence and, retribution that the government dish out to people with sheer wickedness.

The government’s lack of success gets larger as time goes by, which can only signify that the people of the United Kingdom will after some time grow like a missile, becoming the biggest power and, the only one that we need to be worried about.

And the government want to be perturbed about this grinding and drastic occupation by the people, because the minute this takes place, it will be the time where the government certainly will have no voice over what happens to the public of the United Kingdom, the public will have a say over what happens in the United Kingdom.

It will be a savage acquisition and, the people of the United Kingdom will not hide themselves for whom they are, they will bear no camouflage or disguise. They will front their dictators with a position and, expression of power.

If one desires to safeguard their kingdom, then they will equally preserve their people as well. They would not intimidate their country as well as their countrymen.

There is no point preserving one without the other, unless, of course, the only reason you’re protecting, is for the motive of money and enslavement. If you jeopardise your people, then you eventually endanger a species of people, finally making them die out and, all for the motivation of making money, but when all has disappeared and, the species is gone, what bargaining ability will the government be left with?

Review Disabled Children’s Support

Ministers are being encouraged to reconsider care provided for children with disabilities following an investigation into the adequacy of support for families.

The conclusions were heart rending and disturbing and, indicated that some families were unable to bear the expense of basic essentials to live a dignified life.

A study, carried out by the University of Central Lancaster (UClan) for the children’s commissioner, found evidence that poverty signified that some disabled children were not living lives that converged with international human rights standards.

This is about the voiceless and the helpless, as well as making ends meet and, some of these stories that we’re informed about are extremely touching and very distressing.

Money matters are extremely real and very demanding and, parents are equally saying they have little or no say in the methods that services are organised and provided, from transport to access to youth, or play or leisure which is properly modified for one’s disability.

The research was founded on talks and group discussions with 78 disabled children and young people and 17 parents. It was co led by a group of 11 disabled children and young people working with the university.

A spokesman for the Department of Work and Pensions rebuffed some of the conclusions.

“In fact, independent reports show how we are world leaders in support for disabled people with the UK’s spending on disability-related benefits a fifth higher than the EU average.

“The UK is also acknowledged as a world leader in supporting independent living for disabled people, having the best overall rating of 55 countries.

“We continue to spend around £50bn a year on disabled people and their services and our reforms will make sure the billions spent give more targeted support to those who need it most.”

Nonetheless, some of those intimate stories coloured a much different picture and, those officials who have no doubt composed that statement should go and meet some of those young people, who will tell them the true story of living with a disability on an extremely low income.

There is a mum cited in the survey, who because her child required a modified home, incorporating a multi sensory setting, was coerced to make sure that was available, she will be paying for it until November 2022.

There was as well a young woman going through everything that adolescence carries with it, who needs incontinence pads. Benefits pay for four a day; she needs 10. That is not human respect and, it’s not human rights either.

In spite of the condemnation, researchers found numerous examples of disabled children being given good care and services which they said give a demonstration on how low income doesn’t have to be an obstacle.

Nonetheless, proof was as well established of insufficient services, compounding the difficulties of some low income families and, even though families with disabled children often have rights to welfare payments and practical support, their basic incomes frequently don’t deal with the additional costs of raising and caring for a disabled child.

The team analysed three United Nations treaty documents: the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on Persons with Disabilities and the International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights.

Between them these treaties state an individuals’ rights to food, clothes and heating, to live on one’s own, to be able to settle on where to live, to live in their local communities and, to the provisions and amenities they need to be able to do that.

It was found that the lives lived by some disabled children and young people did not fulfil these fundamental rights. There were accounts of some disabled children, young people and their parents not being able to heat their homes properly, or pay for sufficient clothing or food.

Some were not notified or involved in decisions about changes to where they lived. Some experienced delays in alterations being made to their homes and, some didn’t have enough room nor support for independent living.

It appears that because the government has no emotional bond to these people they can then be narrow-minded in the way that they look at the disabled.

If they were more unprejudiced with their views, their response with regard to the disabled might be different and, their reaction towards them would be looked at to a larger degree, but there’s no support, plainly because they don’t have to raise them, consequently it’s easier to throw them to one side like a commodity.

As well it’s not just the young that need assistance, it’s adults similarly, because they’re the selfsame, they’re no different. Their individuality might be somewhat different, but at the end of the day, they’re as well disabled and need support.

They’re as well unable to pay for basic essentials for a dignified life, or is it because they’re adults that they no longer need that support, because it appears that after a certain age people that are adults and disabled no longer appear to be a viable commodity.

Nonetheless, if we’re no longer viable, then as far as the government are interested we’re no longer worth retaining and, as a result, of no real significance.

If we can’t labour and, we’re not making money for them, then they may as well pull the plug on us and, terminate us, since the only reason we’re here in the first place is so that the government can make us into serfs, but what they fail to remember, if there were no slaves, there would be no government!

When people start believing that they need us more than we need them, then maybe it may be better understood that this country doesn’t need to run with a government, it can stand on its own two feet because WE ARE the spine of this government, the government ARE NOT the spine of us!

How Junk Food Manufacturing Has Persuaded Us To Eat Ourselves To Death

There are some frightening ways in which processed food suppliers are sliding mouthwatering but disease-causing extras into our munchables.

So why are diabetes, obesity and hypertension figures still gyrating out of self-control?

It’s not just a matter of limited determination on the part of the shopper and, a give the people what they desire viewpoint on the part of the food makers.

There is a deliberate effort taking place in labs, marketing and grocery store walkways, to get people captivated on foods that are handy and cheap.

Would it astonish you to find out that food giants Kraft, Pepsi and, General Mills use large-scale experimentation and development processes patterned to obtain a consumer ideal bliss point?

Does it surprise you that the said bliss point is an amalgamation of way more sugar, salt and, fat than any of us would load up on our plate otherwise?

Doesn’t it amaze you that this makes those corporate food monsters an enormous amount of money?

Nothing shocks me and, its alarming and, these corporations’ strategies are remarkable, but they appear right in line with marketing tactics that have formed our well padded lives for the last three decades.

Marketing these products is about giving the product a character that is daring and spirited, communicating the concept that this is the best snack food.

The plan is to prey on a special segment of people who are regular snackers, mothers, children, young professionals, keeping their snacking rituals fresh by trying a new food product when it captures their attention.

These establishments position planned storytelling in the advertisement campaigns for snacks, using crucial expressions that have been developed with significant assessment.

Attempting to keep your weight down and endeavouring to stay trim can be completely different things. We go about thinking that sugar free foods and drinks are in fact good for us.

Drinking sugar-free Red Bulls and dumping Splenda into your morning coffee like your life is contingent on it is a little humiliating because you then consider yourself in good health.

Synthetic sweeteners have chemicals or innate composites that take the place of the sweetness of the sugar, without all of the calories, but occasionally the label ‘sugar free’ disguises calories present in the food or drink.

Of course, you can always study the product’s description, but believe it, or not, there are a whole lot of people out there who believe that sugar free or fat free signifies low calorie.

On top of that, there are some investigations that have demonstrated that artificial sweeteners can in fact increase your craving for food.

Next there are sugar free products with ingredients that can amplify your blood sugar dramatically, like the white flour in sugar free cookies. All in all, ‘sugar free’ doesn’t always signify ‘diet friendly’.

Aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal, NatraSweet, Canderel, Spoonfuls, DiabetiSweet) is a general chemical sweetener with potential side effects that sound like they’re out of a horror movie.

From hallucinations to seizures to brain tumours, it’s barely worth consuming for the sake of saved calories.

Sucralose (Otherwise known as Splenda); is frightening. Testing indicates that Splenda can enlarge both the liver and kidneys and shrink the thymus glands.

Sucralose breaks down into small quantities of dichlorofructose, which has not been tested adequately in humans. Splenda reportedly can bring about skin rashes, panic, diarrhoea, headaches, bladder issues, stomach pain and, those side effects don’t even sum it up.

You think this sounds bad? Do some additional investigations. Nearly all artificial sweeteners on store shelves are accompanied by many side effect stories. (Some investigation indicates they result in Cancer and, should something as serious as Cancer actually be disregarded?)

Research as well suggests that they in truth lead to overeating amongst consumers. In addition to all of this, think about the left overs associated in the manufacturing of artificially sweetening.

Ever stepped into a coffee shop and noticed a heap of sugar replacement packets building on the counter or in the garbage? We’ve been throwing away one of our most valuable materials for the sake of a sweetener that can damage our bodies and stop weight loss.

In a surprisingly unethical way the food industry makes food to equal hard drugs for their habit-forming possibilities. ‘Designer sodium’, the origin of the perfect kid’s lunch and, the hunt for the morphine like ‘bliss point’ in soda.

Cheetos, in particular, spotlighted the remarkable precision that goes into what we see as a healthy, recognised food. It’s one of the most marvellously formulated foods on the planet, in terms of unadulterated enjoyment.

Cheetos puffs have an extraordinary ability to melt in the mouth, it’s called vanishing caloric density, it softens down rapidly and, your brain thinks that there’s no calories in it, you can just keep eating it forever.

Almost all widely obtainable foods from Cutie Clementines to dozens of Pringles flavours, have been exquisitely made to attract to our basic requirement for salt, fat and sugar. Food science has perfected the technique of hooking customers on whatever they care to feed on.

Child Poverty No Longer A Problem Of The Workless And Work Shy

Two thirds of impoverished children are at the moment from families where an adult is in employment and, a great deal of low middle income children face being worse off than their parents because of decreased earnings and soaring prices.

Maybe more affluent pensioners’ benefits should be given the chop and, minimum pay increased, but it’s proposed that some benefits are currently protected from cuts, such as unencumbered TV licences and winter fuel allowances for pensioners and, they could therefore be means tested in order to split the responsibility of austerity more evenhandedly.

But a spokesman for David Cameron said: “The prime minister believes it is right to make commitments to pensioners in relationship to state provision.”

The aim to end child poverty by 2020 would in all probability be missed by a sizeable gap, leaving as many as two million children in poverty.

Poverty is determined as having a family salary that is less than 60% of the national average income.

Campaign On Families Who Evade Care Home Fees

Councils are spying on parents who have signed over their homes to their children to dodge care home fees.

Local authority inspectors are rummaging through residents’ financial records to see if they’ve knowingly attempted to hide their property wealth.

You don’t get anything for nothing these days; you work all your life and, what for, to be informed that you’ll have to put your home up for sale and, then pay to go into a care home.

Once more the government continually take from us and, give us nothing back in return, but requires us to work our whole lives, buy our own homes and, then sell them to go into homes in our old age, so that the government can neglect them.

At one time, a husband and wife bought their own homes so that when children came along, they could have a nest egg for when they passed away and, they could go to their demise knowing that their children would be looked after through the sale of their home that they once owned.

Nevertheless, at present, nothing is sacrosanct.

You work, you buy your own home, that you hope will go to your children and, then find that they’ll get nothing because it’s all got to be used up on selling a house to be cared for in a home – makes you wonder why we really work at all.

If they expose proof that parents gave their home away as a ruse to evade care bills, they can use little known powers to coerce the family to put their property up for sale and, pay up.

One council, Buckinghamshire, verified its investigators were making such inquiries.

Leading charity Age UK is so worried at the number of families attempting to evade care fees it has published suggestions of caution of the dangers in signing over property.

This is the nonprofit organisation that has received a slice of the governments £900,000 which is supposedly going to fight fuel poverty and, teach people, giving advice to them and, as well provide sessions to vulnerable people, so consequently it looks like Age UK is no longer a nonprofit organisation if it’s being given money by the government.

It makes families aware that they may be venturing on a dangerous operation, saying that budget conscious councils are likely to look at cases where they believe deprivation of assets may have taken place.

Last night campaigners for the elderly said that the grey area of the law meant that a great deal of families could be vulnerable, losing homes already signed over.

The warning has been issued because a growing number of parents in their 60s and 70s are signing over the deeds to their homes to their children to stop it being counted for means testing. This permits them to live in their home still, but are no longer the legal owners.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: