Countess who Raised A Stink

A countess has had to atone for the pong after her country estate sprayed human faeces onto the fields.

Locals said the smell was like rotting fish and ammonia and stopped them from sunbathing in their gardens.

Countess Bathurst, of grade I listed Cirencester Park in Gloucestershire, the second wife of the 9th Earl Bathurst, admitted on Facebook that they had to hold their hands up to this one. The farm had been spreading biosolids on the fields, and they had to put huge nutrients back into the ground and then plough it in once spread.

The Bathurst Estate said a contractor spread treated sewage from Wessex Water on the fields near Cirencester. It was banking on the wind to take the odour away, but the wind dropped.

Resident Caroline McShane said she grew up in and around farms but added the smell that she smelt when driving through Cirencester was enough to make you vomit, a mix of rotting fish and ammonia, not a natural farming smell.

Janey Hayes said that she was born and bred there, but that this was vile.

In a statement posted on Facebook, the estate said that the spreading was organised for when there was an easterly breeze which would have taken the smell away from the town, but frustratingly the wind dropped in the night and as such the odour hung in the valleys.

And it was said that they have a tractor and cultivator working to incorporate the biosolids as quickly as possible and this would lessen the smell.

The countess, Sara Chapman, was born in Marlborough, Wiltshire and married Earl Bathurst in 1996, later becoming the High Sheriff of Gloucestershire until 2017.

She said that she started smelling the stench during her evening dog walk on Sunday and that at first, she was convinced something big had died in the hedge before realising what it was when the odour followed her all the way home.

Writing on the local Facebook page, Cirencester, a Local Town for Local People, the Countess added that she apologised for the pong and that it was a necessary yearly evil and the wind direction rather let them down.

The Bathurt’s have run the Cirencester Park estate since 1695. Reportedly worth £45 million, the estate sprawls over 15,500 acres of countryside which claims to enclose the principal source of the River Thames.

Earl Bathurst, known as Lord Apsley until his father’s demise in 2011, is a keen conservationist who has campaigned to protect the countryside and historic buildings.

We used to wonder how it was possible to get Salmonella from lettuce or cucumber, and when there were outbreaks it was baffling to think that you could get this from consuming salad, but now we see it – we’re all eating our own faecal matter.

I suppose if you do live in the countryside, you’d get used to the aroma of manure on the fields. It’s part of village life, like clamorous church bells, tractors awakening you at 7 am, cockerels crowing at sunrise, and combine harvesters working late into the night.

Of course, the aroma of farm slurry is one thing, but this human faeces is repugnant, and not the typical country odour at all.

And it appears that poo is now called biosolids, how politically correct. But is this much poo about nothing? And I wonder what the vegans will think when they find out their vegetables have been grown in meat-eaters poo?

But the majority of farmland in the United Kingdom uses biosolids nows, it’s just that the public is too disinterested in farming to understand it, and only care about getting their next meat burger and bun in their stomach when they want it.

It Wasn’t Their Finest Hour

A charity named after Sir Winston Churchill has provoked anger by rebranding itself criticising his opinions on race with one furious official stating that it beggars belief that the man who saved his nation in our darkest hour finds himself cancelled in this way.

The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust has removed images of the wartime leader from its website and is changing its name to the Churchill Fellowship.

Trustees have agreed to change its name to the Churchill Fellowship and erase him from its website in a new woke storm that has sparked anger towards Julia Weston, the charity’s £100,000 a year chief executive whose face appears repeatedly across the website when Sir Winston doesn’t.

Loyal volunteers at the trust said it was rewriting history and pointed out the former prime minister had often been declared the greatest Briton of all time.

Julia Weston has been accused of pursuing a leftie woke agenda and announced the changes in an email to staff three weeks ago, claiming for some time they’ve known that their previous name was confusing as it didn’t reflect what they were about. She also said the charity would focus more on addressing inequality and protecting the environment.

An official statement on the trust’s website said that today there’s debate about aspects of Sir Winston’s life and that many of his opinions on race were broadly viewed as unacceptable, and the view that they share. In the statement it said that left-wing activists have gunned for Sir Winston Churchill for years, accusing him of racism, highlighting his links to Britain’s colonial past and even comparing him to Adolf Hitler, the monstrous authoritarian he helped defeat. His statue in Parliament Square was also defaced during London’s BLM demonstrations.

The charity, which finances academic research and whose chairman is Sir Winston’s grandson Jeremy Soames, was set up using essentially contributions after his demise in 1965, amid an emission of grief and financial donations from a grateful nation who wanted to remember Britain’s greatest ever prime minister.

But Labour candidate Benjamin Whittingham tweeted that Winston Churchill was a racist and white supremacist. And Sir Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill’s grandson was outraged, and Benjamin Whittingham’s Conservative opponent Ben Wallace labelled the remarks ignorant and incredibly insulting.

The tweet was removed and the Labour Party said it didn’t represent the opinion of the Labour Party, and that he apologised unreservedly if it had caused any displeasure.

We need to remember our history, not rewrite it, and this is senseless and shocking because Sir Winston Churchill did so much for the British people and was a man of his time, and if it were not for past things, things would not be what they are today.

We need to respect our history, our beliefs, our heritage, our successes of the past, not slaughter them, and it seems that Britain has become utterly diabolical and insane, and if Winston Churchill hadn’t been in government during World War II, we either wouldn’t be here or you would be seeing jackboots up and down every high street in the United Kingdom, and our language would be German.

And if we open up a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we’ve lost the future – Winston Churchill.

This is hypocritical and two-faced to drop Winston’s name but to keep the charity. If he was that bad, then close the charity down altogether, but they won’t do that because then they’d be left without well-paid jobs.

A Professor At Portland State University Resigns

A Portland State University professor has resigned in a scathing public letter in which he slammed the university for not allowing any kind of thinking that doesn’t suit its liberal agenda, calling it a social justice factory that drives intolerance of divergent beliefs.

Peter Boghossian was a full-time assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University for ten years until his resignation letter was published on Wednesday.

He shared the letter with Bari Weiss, a former New York Times columnist who quit her role at the paper after claiming to encounter the same refusal to consider non-liberal views that Peter Boghossian describes at PSU.

Peter Boghossian said college staff were abdicating their truth-seeking mission and instead, driving intolerance of divergent beliefs by crushing any view that wasn’t liberal.

He wrote that students at Portland State were not being taught to think. Rather, they’re being taught to imitate the moral certainty of ideologies.

Peter Boghossian previously wrote several hoax papers and presented them to academic journals to prove that they would print anything that went along with their ideals, even if the theories in them were fraudulent.

They included papers on dog rape and an adaption to Hitler’s Mein Kampf. The left responded badly to it, saying he’d wasted the editor’s time.

Peter Boghossian says he was harassed on campus with swastikas scrawled on bathroom walls with his name next to them, solely because he’d challenged the university’s ideas.

He maintains that at one time flyers went around the campus depicting him with a Pinocchio nose, that he was spat on and that co-workers told students not to take his class.

In a statement to a newspaper outlet, a spokesperson for the university said that Portland State had always been and would continue to be a welcoming place for free speech and academic freedom.

The spokesperson said that they believed that those practices weren’t in conflict with their core institutional values of students success, racial inequality and impartiality, and proactive engagement with their community.

And it was said that as with all personnel matters, they have no comment on Dr Boghossian’s statement of resignation, and those who asked for proof to justify new institutional policies were accused of microaggressions and that professors were accused of bigotry for assigning canonical texts penned by philosophers who happened to have been European or male.

Sadly, this world is fading fast, and it’s becoming unrecognisable, and we’re in a particularly dangerous place in history, and I’m not sure we can come back from this, and we need more people like Peter Boghossian because at least he did speak up.

Unfortunately, most people have no concept of what’s happening, especially when they have their faces stuck in their cell phones.

Students are now taught to think, but not taught what to think, and the emerging generation are losing their crucial skills.

Having great conversations with someone of a different thought and ideas was fabulous, it opened your mind and you learnt to have a little patience, and sociology, philosophy and psychology classes were some of the best in regards to open debates, sadly, it seems that free thinking is no longer allowed.

Critical thinking is a necessary skill, sadly, the youth of today have probably never heard of the term, and Dr Boghossian might have quit, however, the dangerous ones stay.

I have every respect for this man, putting his principles first because he realises that, outside the woke education system, the vast preponderance of people are as much against wokism as he is, the trouble is, nobody wants to say they have an opinion on it.

An HR Advisor Was Dismissed For Complaining

An HR advisor who said he had been left astounded and disappointed after getting only three chicken nuggets for lunch has been awarded over £5,000 after he was dismissed for complaining.

Dissatisfied Steven Smith, 30, had been upset at the size of the £1.99 portion he was given in the office canteen of the company support firm where he worked.

An employment tribunal discovered that when he questioned why others were getting four or five nuggets, he said he felt offended when he was told he could get three more for an additional 99 pence.

Steven Smith advised the dinner lady he was not a child and if he’d wanted a happy meal he would have gone to McDonald’s before pushing the meal back towards her and leaving the canteen.

The woman said the incident left her belly churning and almost scared to come into work.

She complained about his behaviour and Steven Smith was later fired for gross misconduct after the company decided he acted violently.

But the tribunal decided that he was unfairly dismissed as the matter was not investigated properly by bosses and will now be awarded £5,181.60.

The Glasgow hearing was told Steven Smith started working for Teleperformance Limited, a company that offers support to clients such as energy companies, in the human resources department, based in Airdrie, Scotland in November 2016.

In September 2019, during a 12-hour shift, Steven Smith had gone to the canteen and had asked for chicken nuggets, chips, beans and cheese.

As he saw only three pieces of meat put in a carton for him, Steven Smith said, ‘is that it?’ and questioned why his co-workers were given four or five, the canteen worker told the panel.

The worker said Steven Smith said that he was not a child and that they could keep it and forcibly shoved the carton back before storming off, the tribunal heard.

The canteen worker said that she knew he was annoyed by his manner and by his tone and language change. He was not yelling but he was louder than he’d previously been.

She said that she could tell by his face and that her stomach was churning.

She then reported the incident as the kitchen staff found his conduct extreme.

Steven Smith was then brought in for a disciplinary meeting to discuss the allegations that he’d attacked a canteen assistant.

In the meeting, Steven Smith said that he just wanted to get food and get out to go back to his job, but due to the disillusion of what was presented before him in the white carton in which the food was presented and the utter shock of what he was presented with, he bestowed nothing more than disappointment at which the said canteen lady should have attempted to raise a complaint.

Almost all frontline customer service workers are faced with rude and irritable behaviour and occasionally lost tempers daily, regrettably, it goes with the job, and the canteen staff should have been able to de-escalate this awkward situation, but clearly, she was a very sensitive lady.

The woman said that this incident had left her stomach churning and almost too frightened to come into work, but then this is representative of modern-day society who are intimidated by their own shadow or spend their entire life complaining and being offended by anything and everything.

But whether the complaint was malicious or not, it was taken too far, although that doesn’t mean that her complaint wasn’t valid, and maybe he should have just been given a verbal warning instead, and not fired for it.

Are Taxpayers Going To Get Anything Back For The Extra £10 Billion Spent On The NHS?

British taxpayers were informed today that Boris Johnson’s manifesto busting £30 billion NHS handout will be eaten up permanently by the health service, with waiting lists and delays here to stay.

The Prime Minister promised the additional £10 billion a year to clear the enormous backlog that has accumulated during the pandemic, on top of the £5.4 billion cash boost announced for the NHS only a couple of days ago.

But the handout has been given to the NHS without any specific targets to meet, which has raised concerns the money will just be swallowed. NHS bosses have already complained the amount isn’t enough to clear the backlog.

Under the proposals, half of the £10 billion a year will be used on social care in 2023 before the entire amount is given to the care sector in 2025, and in theory, the NHS returns to its normal budget.

Critics have raised misgivings about the plan, claiming that if the NHS goes on a recruitment binge to fill staffing gaps then those salaries will need to be paid beyond 2025.

Announcing the tax hike yesterday, Boris Johnson said the money would go towards nine million more checks, scans and procedures by the end of 2025, as part of the biggest catch-up programme in the NHS’s history.

He vowed to increase NHS capacity for routine operations by 30 per cent compared to pre-pandemic levels, hire 50,000 more nurses and open new surgical hubs to deliver additional operations and other procedures.

According to the Resolution Foundation, by 2025, about 40 per cent of all day to day Government spending will go to the Department of Health and Social Care, which funds the health service.

The Conservative think tank, the Institute for Economic Affairs, warned the cash boost would almost entirely be used on hiring new staff and increasing salaries, which will be difficult to recover after 2025.

The left-wing Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) said the funding was nothing like enough to get through the backlog, with the NHS alone needing £15 billion per year to address the waiting list.

NHS England was already 38,952 nurses short at the end of June and it’s not clear how fast surgical hubs could take to set up how they will be staffed.

A record 5.5 million people were on the waiting list for routine procedures and treatments, such as hip and knee replacements, at the end of June and with data for July due out tomorrow, that figure was expected to further rise.

A condition of this additional funding should be a wage freeze for all management grades in the NHS for the next five years, or until the COVID backlog is cleared, which should give them some incentive to up their game.

We are now at the back of a lengthy line, especially the British elderly, with many being denied the opportunity to even get in the queue, and it seems you’re now too old to get sight-saving cataract surgeries, pain-relieving treatment, and other life-saving treatments as well.

And I doubt a penny of it will even reach the necessary departments. It might pay for managers, senior managers, or even more senior managers and the refurbishment of their offices, and I bet they pay top rates for everything that’s brought in and don’t forget all those millions of illegals that are here getting special treatment while the British people get held back.

GP practices in England get an average of £155 per patient.

£3,783.6 million in global sum payments;
£715.8 million for the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF);
£833.5 million in premises payments;
And £1,515.5 million for the ‘balance of PMS expenditure’.

And then you have council tax, which gets hiked up every year and that depends on if the bin men choose to collect your rubbish or not.

Get rid of foreign aid, and sort out illegal immigration, which would help to save billions.

Kamala Harris Frees Domestic Abuser In Minneapolis

An alleged Minneapolis domestic abuser has been arrested and charged with murder he’s said to have carried out weeks after being released thanks to a bail fund backed by Vice President Kamala Harris.

George Howard, 48, was bailed out by the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) on August 6 after being held on $11,500 on charges of domestic abuse.

Weeks later, George Howard was charged with murder when he killed another motorist on I-94 during a road rage incident on August 29.

The victim has been named as 38-year-old Luis Damian Martinez Ortiz who was declared dead after he was shot in the chest by George Howard.

MFF’s work, which helped free George Howard to supposedly kill, was promoted by Vice President Kamala Harris during her campaign last year.

Kamala Harris tweeted that if you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.

Surveillance footage obtained by the Minneapolis Police Department captured the road rage incident that transpired near the entrance ramp of the interstate.

According to KSTP-TV, George Howard was reportedly driving a white Volvo with Ortiz in a blue BMW.

The footage showed the moment Ortiz was shot after he approached George Howard’s vehicle only to collapse soon after.

Ortiz later crashed into the centre median after getting back into his vehicle and was taken to a local hospital where he was declared dead.

After George Howard fled the scene, footage revealed him driving to a nearby gas station where he then switched with another passenger in the vehicle.

The passenger, who supposedly was in the vehicle at the time of the shooting, alleged that Ortiz had punched George Howard before the shooting occurred.

George Howard, however, insists he didn’t kill Ortiz but that another passenger in his vehicle did.

The incident remains under investigation and the identity of the other passenger is currently unclear.

George Howard was charged with one felony count of second-degree murder with intent and one felony count of second-degree murder without intent, and he could face up to 80 years in jail if he’s found guilty of the charges. Details of the original domestic abuse allegation against him haven’t been shared.

In response to the event, the MFF tweeted on Friday that they were aware of reports of the terrible and fatal shooting in Minneapolis, supposedly involving George Howard, a person the Minnesota Freedom Fund had previously provided with bail support.

Kamala Harris probably won’t go near Minnesota for years now.

Sadly people don’t have a psychic vision and have no way of knowing if someone will perpetrate a further in the future when given bail, but it does appear as though the administration is a shambles, and I’m sure this isn’t the only person who’s been freed by this fund that has gone on to kill and victimise people.

And Kamala Harris will probably laugh it off as she seems to about everything else. A typical masking method and when you haven’t got a clue what to say, smile and hope that it will go away.

If there were real media, someone would ask her about this, but it’s too bad there aren’t any with any guts. So Kamala Harris, what do you have to say for yourself? I’m sure the many readers would like to hear what you have to say about this incident.

Of course, there are some people out there that should have the right to bail, but it’s determining who those people are and what they’ve done, and taking an educated guess does not suffice.

A Variant Of ‘Mu’ Has Been Identified In Every State In The US Excluding Nebraska

The ‘Mu’ variant of COVID 19 which scientists fear could be more transmissible than Delta, has now been discovered in all US states except for Nebraska.

Florida and California have reported 384 variant cases, the highest numbers amongst the 49 infected US states.

Los Angeles County reported close to half of the California cases with 167.

The new cases, however, only reflect 0.2 per cent of total variant samples from the state of California between June and August.

Alaska previously had the greatest number of ‘Mu’ variant cases with 146. That represented four per cent of all cases recorded in the isolated state.

According to Newsweek, other US states have also shared their ‘Mu’ numbers, with 42 in Maine, 73 in Connecticut and 39 in Hawaii.

The ‘Mu’ variant, which was identified in Columbia in January, has spread to 41 different countries including the United States and is also feared to possibly be vaccine-resistant.

The variant became of interest due to its potential to become more transmissible and vaccine-resistant as discovered by the World Health Organisation on August 30. However, the CDC hasn’t shared this analysis.

Director of LA County Public Health Barbara Ferrer said in a statement that the identification of variants like ‘Mu’, and the spreading of variants across the globe, highlights the need for LA County residents to continue to take steps to protect themselves and others.

She said that this was what makes getting vaccinated and layering protections so necessary, and these were the things that broke the chain of transmission and limited COVID 19 proliferation that allows for the virus to mutate into something that could be more serious.

Dr Anthony Fauci also commented on the ‘Mu’ variant insisting that it wouldn’t be the next dominant COVID strain. He said that even though it hasn’t in essence taken a grip to any extent, they always pay heed at all times to variants and that they don’t consider it an immediate threat right now.

However, the variant has been described by Dr Anthony Fauci as a constellation of mutations that suggest that it would evade certain antibodies, not only monoclonal antibodies but vaccine and convalescent serum-induced antibodies.

The peak of ‘Mu’ variant cases was present in mid-July and have been fading since. However, the concern is that the variant will increase again in the future.

Are these vaccines going to win the war on COVID, well we don’t really know, so perhaps they should be concentrating on developing medications to treat those who get dangerously sick?

And it appears that we are getting all kinds of variants, one after the other. Is this a coincidence, or part of a plan?

These vaccines are increasingly required just so that we can have some kind of normal life, and if we don’t, then we can’t participate in normal life. It does seem like some form of control.

But even worse than the Delta variant, which is even worse than COVID 19, which is even worse than anything we have ever seen before, is the media variant.

The ‘Mu’ variant might still be somewhat obscure, and it is wrong to characterise it as the boogie man, but we should still be informed of the possible perils that are out there.

Of course, the virus is going to mutate, and the more it mutates, the more it will struggle to survive, and the weaker it gets, so hopefully, the worst is over.

But in another couple of months they will come up with another kind of variant, and they keep saying they know how to get rid of it, but the past 18 months demonstrates that they don’t have the foggiest.

Let’s take a look back. First, it was quarantining that would prevent the spread, so they closed down every business and told people to stay inside for two weeks. Then came the masks, and they said that the masks would help to end COVID, but after six months of mask mandates, COVID infections still grew sky high.

Then it was the vaccine. The vaccine would definitely stop COVID they said, but here we are and COVID is still here to stay. And it doesn’t seem like it will ever go away, it will be like the flu for the rest of our lives.

Our Homes Would Have Stayed Under The £80,000 Social Care Cap

Families have told of their suffering at losing their homes to pay for social care as Boris Johnson plans to unveil his tax invasion to fix the mess.

The Prime Minister will today brace Britain for a manifesto busting £10 billion tax invasion as he defies critics by driving up national insurance on 25 million workers and millions of firms.

The move will cost employees £30,000 a year, an additional £255 in tax, approximately £5 a week, and Boris Johnson warned last night the NHS can’t recover from the pandemic without a huge cash injection.

And he said it was time to end the scandal of pensioners having to sell their homes to fund care in later life. The tax rise of 1.25 percentage points shatters his solemn 2019 election vow not to raise national insurance.

Boris Johnson last night said the immense pressure placed on the NHS by the pandemic, coupled with the fragmented care system meant that he couldn’t dodge the tough decisions.

Cash will be poured into the NHS to enable it to run at 110 per cent of capacity to help it start clearing a waiting list that has risen to more than five million during the pandemic and is on track to hit 13 million by next year.

The NHS will also be ordered to undergo a major efficiency initiative. Ministers hope the money will clear the waiting list backlog by the time of the next election.

The proceeds of the tax increase of 1.25 percentage points will then be used to finance a new cap of £80,000 on the cost of social care, reducing the risk that people will have to sell their homes to pay for help.

Assets below £100,000 will be protected from the state, a huge increase on the current system in which people have to finance all their care costs if they have assets of more than just £23,350.

Here, someone tells of their torment of the home they lost that they would have been able to keep under the proposed new scheme.

Nancy Griffiths, 55, had lived in Kingston, southwest London for 33 years.

She and her daughter Tai, 13, became extremely close to their ageing neighbours David and Violet Edwards, always spending Christmas together.

David, who’d worked for British Aerospace for numerous years, sadly developed dementia in 2016 and died two years later aged 92.

Violet had hoped to spend her final years in her matrimonial home. However, because the pair had saved and lived frugally David’s care had been paid for privately at a cost of approximately £2,000 a week.

After David’s death, Violet, 93, became extremely frail and was moved into a care home at an eyewatering cost of £65,000 per year.

Within four years, £300,000 of their hard-earned savings of about £400,000 had disappeared.

Nancy, who had power of attorney, sadly, had no choice but to sell the Edward’s home to pay for Violet’s care.

It had originally been on the market for £620,000 but, under pressure to sell, she was forced to take a lower offer of £520,000.

Nancy said that David made everything in that house, from the conservatory to the fireplace, he even papered all the walls, and it broke her heart to sell it, and she added that she completely supported any changes to the law so that people didn’t have to sell their homes for social care because she thought it was wrong.

She said that she wasn’t Violet’s child so she wouldn’t be getting anything in the will, but said that she feels sad for people who are expected to rely on money from their parents after they’ve passed away.

And then there are those people that haven’t paid into the system and get everything for free, so what’s the point of working at all?

I mean, why would you want to go to work to pay everything out of your hard-earned money, then have to sell your home, when someone else is getting it for free, especially boat people, that come over to our country, get everything for free and don’t have to pay anything back, the system is wrong and unfair, and it’s always hard working people that get punished.

There appears to be no point now and perhaps the millions who can work but refuse to have the right idea because Britain is slowly turning socialist.

People should not have to sell their hard-earned homes to pay for their care and this should come under the NHS, for goodness sake, they paid enough into it and after all, it’s an illness that causes the situation.

I guess the argument is that why should taxpayers pay for their care when they have big houses that they intend on leaving to their children. Well, the point is, if you’ve worked arduously to get that home – the home that you probably brought your children up in, and that all your memories are in, why wouldn’t they want to leave it to their children.

It’s a nest egg for your children, or whoever you decide to leave it to, but the point is not that it’s being left to someone else, the point is that the home was bought and paid for by hard-working people, otherwise what’s the purpose of owning your own home, but that’s what the government are banking on because they don’t want you to own anything, they want to take all those pleasures away from you.

Social care should be provided by the government just like the NHS. What’s the problem? Oh, I forgot, we have no problem sending billions to other countries for aid, and sending rockets into space – silly me!

As 9/11 Nears Its 20th Anniversary

This Saturday is the 20th anniversary of 9/11, one of the darkest days in American history.

To mark the event, President Joe Biden will travel to Ground Zero in New York where the Twin Towers were demolished, to Virginia where a plane was flown into the Pentagon, and to a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania where Flight United 93 also crashed after an on-air battle between subversives and brave travellers.

This would be a sombre enough experience for any American President given that approximately 3,000 people were killed on that infamous day back in 2001, which represented a disastrous failure of US intelligence.

But now it will also be a moment of intense shame and humiliation too, thanks to Joe Biden’s shocking mishandling of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and abject surrender to the very people who helped commit the attacks by harbouring the subversives who carried them out.

Today, the Taliban declared complete victory in the 20-year conflict that ensued after America invaded Afghanistan to avenge the 9/11 atrocity, insisting they’d seized control of Afghanistan’s Panjshir province, the last of 34 provinces to hold out against them.

America’s defeat to just 75,000 bloodthirsty medieval thugs was thus concluded, and the full scale of that defeat is only gradually becoming depressingly obvious.

The horrifying scenes in the immediate aftermath of the withdrawal were terrible enough, notably, the suicide bomber attack on Kabul airport that killed 13 US troops and several hundred desperate Afghan people, including scores of women and children.

But to rub salt on the bodies, blood and wounds, joyous Taliban fighters have been marching around mocking America by posing in US military attire and equipment, holding pretended funerals for American, British, French and NATO forces, tracking down and killing anyone who supported the US or its allies, and ordering frightened Afghan women back inside their homes on pain of cruel punishment.

But Joe Biden, whose relentless virtue signalling about women’s rights now looks preposterously hypocritical. He assured every American who wanted to leave Afghanistan that they would be able to leave.

But a newspaper outlet this morning reported that about 1,000 people, including numerous American citizens and Afghans holding visas to the United States or other nations, have been trapped in Afghanistan for five days as they await clearance for the departure from the Taliban.

So, the fate of yet more US lives, and those who endangered their lives to help America, rests in the hands of the scum who harboured al-Qaeda’s terrorists, and there’s nothing that President Joe Biden can do about it, other than hope the Taliban do the decent thing when they’ve never done a decent thing in their lives.

All that President Joe Biden was meant to be was the sacrificial lamb, and ultimately, he will go to the slaughter.

Now it’s pretty near to the anniversary of 9/11, and perhaps people are feeling extremely frightened and worried that something bad is going to happen again on American soil.

America isn’t weak, but their current leader is spineless, cowardly and extremely disloyal, and if their adversaries thought that they were spineless they would have attacked by now, but of course, they know better.

From an outsider looking in, he might not be the worst president that America has had but he’s definitely not the best.

In 2001 bodies were plummeting to the ground from burning towers, now twenty years later they’re instead, dropping from planes in Afghanistan, and it’s going to be an awkward 9/11 anniversary, that’s for sure.

There Were Nineteen Positive Tests For Cocaine And Cannabis In One Regiment

A group of nineteen soldiers from one squadron have tested positive for cocaine and cannabis in the army’s biggest-ever drugs bust.

Sources revealed that the squaddies from the 1st Battalion, Yorkshire Regiment had been taking the drugs at the barracks and their home.

The majority were soldiers of Private rank but at least one was a Lance Corporal.

A source told a newspaper outlet that this was off the scale, and that it had sent shockwaves through the Army, and that nineteen in one round of testing was a large number and raised pretty serious questions.

It was said that before lockdown, the regiment was being tested every few weeks but that this latest round was the first for quite a long time, and that these were specific cases, so it wasn’t one wild night out.

Soldiers in the Catterick Garrison in North Yorkshire had complained they were bored and had nothing to do.

The army confirmed the bust, saying in a statement that several soldiers from 1 YORKS recently failed a compulsory drugs test, and it was said that the Army doesn’t tolerate drug abuse within its ranks as it’s incompatible with military service and operational effectiveness and that Army personnel found taking drugs can expect to be discharged.

Drug use is rising in the Armed Forces, latest figures reveal, with 660 personnel dismissed in 2019 for failing a test. The number was an increase from 580 two years ago.

Of course, they shouldn’t be doing this sort of thing, it’s the rules, after all, but all kinds of people do it, your next-door-neighbour, your kids, your work colleagues who have probably racked up lines and smoked herb – even nurses, teachers, solicitors, and sports players, and all government officials should be tested as well – judges, police and the courts for starters.

Although, it has to be said that nurses and teachers don’t have access to rifles and tanks.

And I would hate to think I was in a hospital where a nurse had been taking drugs, and I certainly wouldn’t be happy to get on a plane knowing that the pilots may have taken drugs, or go into an operating theatre as a patient because I would be too concerned that this rubbish had befuddled their brains and ability to think straight.

But it also makes you wonder if these soldiers are taking the drugs so that they fail their test so that they can be discharged – let’s face it, it would be the most foolproof way to get out of the army.

Nineteen soldiers from one regiment, well that’s a record not to be sniffed at.

Although, they really should look at the reasons for these lads taking drugs, aside from the obvious ones.

I can imagine that morale is extremely low in the forces now and if need help, they’re certainly not going to get or expect it. I wonder if they will publish the statistics of how many members are suffering from having served in Afghanistan, and then we question why they’re on drugs, and if your job involved putting your life on the line for a government that couldn’t care less, you’d probably be on something as well.

And why should we be so shocked that soldiers are taking drugs, hell, even the Cabinet minister’s are taking them, so why shouldn’t soldiers?

But then most of the United Kingdom is shocking, and we have the wrong kind of mentors, all the way up from schools to politics.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started