Singer’s Opera Dream Is Under Threat

A music student fears her odds of fulfilling her dream of becoming an opera singer could be ruined without an operation to reduce the size of her breasts.

Maddie Boreham, 22, says she’s in agony because of back pain, which is making it increasingly difficult to stand straight and sing.

The 5 foot 8-inch singer is crowdfunding through the internet to raise the £7,000 she requires for the operation to reduce the size of her 34KK breasts.

Describing the impact on her performance, she said that as an opera singer, you have to hold yourself in a certain way when you sing, and she said that she was rehearsing for a concert recently, doing a chorus piece, but that by the end of the day, she could hardly stand anymore because of the pressure her breasts were putting on her back, and that rehearsals were agony for her now.

Miss Boreham, of Kettering, Northamptonshire, is due to graduate from the Royal College of Music in Kensington, west London, next June.

She added that the pain she’s feeling because of her breasts is getting worse and she’s struggling to stand up straight to sing for long periods, and she said that she’s been working for years to become an opera singer, but that she’s at a point now where if she doesn’t get the surgery then she’s not going to be able to carry on, and she worries that she will face a lengthy wait to have surgery on the NHS, adding that it doesn’t feel right to put added stress on the NHS right now.

Ideally, she said she would like to reduce her cup size to a C or D.

To donate to Miss Boreham’s appeal, visit uk.gofundme.com/f/maddiesnewchest

I just don’t understand why this isn’t being done on the NHS, given that it’s causing her medical problems and affecting her daily life. It’s not like women have any control over their breast size, other than general weight control, although you wouldn’t expect her to be given priority over a cancer patient, and I’m sure that Miss Boreham wouldn’t either.

Sadly, this was one of the cuts a few years back, but annoyingly they will give fertility treatments to a woman who’s already had children, but treatments like breast reduction were considered irrelevant.

This is one particular operation that should be done on the NHS because not only can it cause health problems, but psychological problems as well, and why should she pay when the cost to the NHS for a breast reduction would be far less than the continuous cost for musculoskeletal problems – this is not a cosmetic procedure.

But let’s hope that her singing career eventually busts out. However, her back must be in agony, and I can’t blame her for going private, and of course, the aftercare is better too.

And just because the good Lord gave her an extra helping, doesn’t mean she should be penalised because of it, and I hope that she does get her breast reduction because it beggar’s belief when we have all these new dinghy arrivals who will get treated, yet someone with a genuine problem like this can’t get relief.

It’s not just the back pain, it’s pain that they can cause to the neck and shoulders. Rashes because large breasts trap heat and moisture underneath them, causing persistent rashes and skin infections, along with shoulder grooves, numbness and headaches, and in some cases shortness of breath.

Channel 4 Is Condemned For Putting Women In Danger

Channel 4 has been accused of running a creepy bus advert that puts women at risk because it says the person sat above a section of the advertisement ‘loves being naked.’

The broadcaster’s endeavour at humour to promote Naked Attraction has rebounded amid criticism it’s improper given how many sexual attacks occur on public transportation.

Others have also expressed concerns that children and young people could find themselves sat in a seat with the wording directed at them.

Transport for London has announced that it’s essentially reassessing whether these adverts should continue to run.

Under the heading Altogether Different, the advertising panel which covers almost the length of the bus has three descriptions of people written out with an arrow pointing up to the person who is sat above it, inside the vehicle.

One is captioned ‘Loves Naked Attraction’, another ‘Hates Naked Attraction’ and the last one reads ‘Loves Being Naked.’

Naked Attraction is Channel 4’s dating program, hosted by Anna Richardson, where a contestant picks a partner based on what they look like without any clothes on.

Writer Tracy King put a photo of the advert on social media along with her critique of it. Her post got thousands of responses.

She wrote, what the hell is this creepy bus ad? And that you can’t just label non-consenting passengers like that, and she said that doesn’t Channel 4 know how many sexual attacks take place on buses?

She added that people should be extremely careful with adverts that include the public without their permission, and she said that if they’re going to make the public the subject of the joke then the joke certainly shouldn’t be a sexualised one.

Others joined the critique calling the advert inappropriate and disgraceful, and one said they’d been disgusted by it.

Concerns were expressed about the fact that children and young people sit in these seats and also that it could lead to people being targeted.

Lothian Buses in a tweet said it had passed on concerns expressed by one of its customers, and Channel 4 has apologised, and a spokesperson said that it was not their aim to offend and that they apologise if it has done so.

Who thought this advert was a great idea? They must have realised that it would be embarrassing to people, men, women or young children, to inadvertently sit in that seat and be laughed at, but then, of course, this isn’t surprising from cesspit TV.

Not only is Naked Attraction the most ridiculous show I’ve ever seen and so pointless, but the program also shouldn’t be allowed to run, not after these ridiculous adverts.

But then the advert appears to have generated a lot of attention, which I guess is the point of advertising, but even so, this is so obviously inappropriate.

The advert is trash, also offensive, and the TV show is puerile.

The TV show is offensive, and I’m not a spoilsport, but this is just a foolish gawking program, all the while encouraging leery and superficial behaviour in society, and I can’t believe that this rubbish passes for entertainment.

This is terrible TV and pure cringe, and whoever thought up the idea was probably doing it for a laugh, but the shock factor has gone, time to ditch it – the show is disgusting, never mind the bus advertisement, and then we wonder why western culture is going down the pan, it’s because our values are being eroded by the rubbish spewed on our televisions.

Holy cow!

Amusing footage was caught the moment a calf was captured riding in the backseat of a vehicle in a Wisconsin McDonald’s drive-thru.

Jessica Nelson recorded the incident in the Marshfield drive-thru as she sat three cars behind the Buick Sedan with the cow’s face staring out of the back window.

‘A whole freaking cow!!! Tell me you live in Wisconsin without telling me you live in Wisconsin’, she posted with the video on Facebook, a nod to her home state’s famous dairy industry.

The caption on the video read that there was a whole cow in the back of that vehicle.

According to Jessica Nelson, Mosinee, Wisconsin, was originally convinced the cow was fake and didn’t realise that there were two other calves in the backseat as well.

The owner, identified only as Bernie, also said that the cow in the video was a calf as well.

Nelson told a newspaper outlet that she thought it was fake at first. Who puts a cow in a Buick? But then its whole head moved, and she said that she just took the video of it because she was so blown away that there was a cow in the back of a Buick.

The video became an overnight success after Nelson posted the video on August 26, and she said that she woke up to 52K views, over 2K shares, and at least 6 news sources reaching out to use her video, all because an old man drove through McDonald’s with a cutie cow and that she wished she was able to give him all the credit because all she did was just shoot the video.

Since the video was posted, it’s received 215,000 views along with 344 comments and 2,000 likes on Facebook, with one user saying that there was nothing wrong with taking a cow to get a burger, and another added jokingly that they hoped the cow was wearing a diaper.

However, it does make you wonder if fast food restaurants are that desperate for food! And we know there’s a milkshake shortage at McDonald’s, but what the hell!

Perhaps it was just a good lesson for the cow, that if it doesn’t behave, it will end up like its mother, a patty in a fast-food sandwich.

But in all fairness, the cow did look like it was looking out of the car window enjoying the scenery, and I know that McDonald’s are having problems with their supply chain, but this really isn’t the answer. Of course, there’s nothing like bringing your own meat with you.

However, this cow looks quite happy and seems to be treated a lot better than a lot of farmers treat their livestock, and this brings a whole new meaning to Animal Farm.

The United States Puts Pressure On Britain To Hand Over Prince Andrew

It’s been reported that the United States has put pressure on Britain in a bid to force Prince Andrew to co-operate with investigators over sex abuse allegations.

Investigators investigating the case of Ghislaine Maxwell and other associates of dead billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein are said to want to speak to the Duke of York about his association with the paedophile financier.

Officials from President Biden’s government reaffirmed the US and UK’s close relationship when it comes to offering legal assistance in criminal affairs amid mounting frustration over Prince Andrew’s unwillingness to engage with investigators.

A US government official told a newspaper outlet that the US and the United Kingdom have a close, fruitful and resilient law enforcement and mutual legal assistance relationship.

And it was said that they remain in close contact on many active cases daily and would proceed to solicit assistance in criminal matters as they provide similar assistance in return.

Prosecutors last year sent the British government a formal request, known as a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) submission, asking for access to the prince so they could speak to him.

The MLAT is a method used in criminal investigations to gather material from foreign nations which can’t easily be obtained on a cooperative basis but it’s understood the Duke of York has yet to co-operate.

And it’s been reported that Prince Andrew remains a person of interest to prosecutors in the office of the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, but they don’t expect to be able to question him in the foreseeable future.

As a person of interest, the Queen’s son is viewed at least as a possible witness, and interviewing him would form part of the investigation into potential co-conspirators.

Prosecutors earlier this month said Prince Andrew, 61, had endeavoured to falsely define himself to the public as eager and willing to cooperate, but had provided no interview to federal authorities and had repeatedly declined requests to speak with investigators.

It comes as Virginia Giuffre, who said she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein, filed a civil complaint against Prince Andrew in Manhattan federal court.

Virginia Giuffre, who used to be known as Virginia Roberts, claims Jeffrey Epstein forced her to have unwanted sexual intercourse with Prince Andrew at the London home of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s alleged Madame.

If the FBI want to interview Prince Andrew, why can’t they simply hop over to the United Kingdom and question him with his lawyer present?

And there must be many more in the US who went to far more parties and weekends at Jeffrey Epstein’s house et cetera, but they seem to be hell-bent on speaking to Prince Andrew, but I’m guessing that’s because he’s a high profile person around the world, whereas the others are seemingly far less, but then I’m guessing he’s an easy target as the Royal Family don’t argue back.

However, if Prince Andrew has nothing to hide, then the Royal Family should just hand him over, but we have to be careful here because let’s face it nobody out there is for truth and justice now.

And whether we like it or not, Prince Andrew has certain legal protections as a UK citizen, and anybody in his situation wouldn’t be stupid enough to give up those protections freely and just get on a plane to the US to testify under oath.

World’s Most Northerly Island Is Discovered By Accident

A team of Arctic researchers believe they’ve stumbled across the world’s most northerly island.

The Danish scientists had been intending to travel to Oodaaq, which lies off the northern coast of Greenland, and previously held the title of the northernmost island, but instead, they wound up on an obscure piece of land even further north and realised only when island enthusiasts pointed it out to them on social media.

Expedition leader Morten Rasch, from the University of Copenhagen, said that they were convinced that the island they were standing on was Oodaaq, which until then was listed as the world’s northernmost island.

However, when photos were posted of the island and its coordinates on social media, several American island hunters went crazy and said that it couldn’t be true.

The island, which may have been formed after a major storm, is half a mile north of Oodaaq and consists essentially of small mounds of silt and gravel.

The university said that it measures just 100 feet by 200 feet and rises to 13 feet above sea level.

The team hope to call it Qeqertaq Avannarleq – Greenlandic for ‘the northernmost island.’ And they added that the island may disappear when another storm hits.

I just hope they leave it alone because it seems that whatever is found, humans have got to take it over.

And apparently, a new island has been identified in the Antarctic, which is deemed to be melting, and sea levels increasing, with land being submerged as a result – I wonder how that works. But it’s okay, a new island has been discovered, so all is good. Better be careful though because someone will have their eye on it – perhaps it will become Santas new base station!

But of course, this discovery was brought to us by global warming.

Internet Trolls Are Just As Mean In Real Life

According to a new study, internet bullies are just as mean in real life.

The study, from the political science department at Aarhus University, demystifies the long-held hypothesis that people are only nasty while posting anonymously online.

And according to a study published in the American Political Science Review, it also found that nice people may wish to circumvent all political debates online, whether the forums are antagonistic or not.

The researchers did discover that the hostility levels of online political debates were worse than offline discussions, but that the frequency of behaviour was about the same online and in real life.

Michael Bang Peterson, the professor who co-authored the study, told the magazine Engineering & Technology that the behaviour of an internet troll was much more noticeable than the behaviour of the same person offline.

Michael Bang Peterson told the magazine that their research revealed that the reason many people feel that online political debates are so antagonistic has to do with the visibility of aggressive behaviour online.

The researchers began the paper with an apparent dig at Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who was named the Time Magazine ‘Person of the Year’ in 2010.

The Time Magazine piece on Mark Zuckerberg reads, as cited by the researchers that Facebook wants to populate the wilderness, tame the howling mob and turning the lonely, antisocial world of random chance into a friendly world.

The researchers noted that efforts from social media titans to get people to engage in civil debates on subjects such as politics have flopped spectacularly.

The researchers wrote that online discussions about politics turned out to be nasty, brutish and not nearly short enough.

The researchers cited a 2017 Pew Research Centre survey which found that 62 per cent of Americans thought online harassment had become a significant problem for the country.

The researchers wrote that there seems to be a hostility gap where online discussions were felt significantly more antagonistic than offline discussions.

While conducting their study, the researchers considered the mismatched hypothesis, one of the most common theories in academic discussion about online hostility.

The mismatch hypothesis speculates that otherwise agreeable people can turn into nasty trolls when they can’t physically see the person with whom they’re arguing.

Alexander Bor, a post-doctorate researcher who co-authored the study, tweeted about the results of the study.

He tweeted that the people that are hateful on Twitter offend others in face to face discussions too.

People post on social media all the time and don’t use vulgarity or confrontational language of any kind, but others will be on them like a deranged pack of wolves, attacking that person’s intellect, their character and sometimes even their family. And it’s remarkable the speed and viciousness with which they will attack.

A lot of people don’t like to accept that a large number of people are bad. It has never made any sense to blame the internet for their behaviour. Nice people are in the minority.

Unfortunately, trolls are usually people who have an opinion on everything, and they take it out on the keyboard, lurking behind a screen, but what we should remember is never to feed them because they’re like gremlins and the more you feed them, the more they propagate, and sadly, media makes people believe that they’re important.

But maybe it’s because we’re very near death of free speech, so the only outlet left is to voice their frustration, and it’s no surprise people have become bitter and discouraged by all this madness, which they just inflict on other people who just want to get on with their lives.

California Teacher Sparks Outrage

A California high school teacher is being investigated by the school board after she admitted she’d got her pupils to pledge allegiance to the gay pride flag instead of the American one.

Kristen Pitzen, of Newport Mesa School District in Orange County, posted a video to TikTok, where she admitted she’d removed the American flag because it made her uncomfortable.

When one of her English class pupils pointed out it was missing during the Pledge of Allegiance, she told them to recite the pledge to the only flag she did have hanging in her classroom, the gay pride flag.

The TikTok has since gone viral, sparking a backlash from numerous parents who were incensed she was teaching children to disrespect the American flag.

One user replied, how can the words for liberty and justice for all bring such hate in people. How can anyone have an issue with those words? Some even questioned why she even lives in America, calling on the school to fire her and for parents to homeschool their children.

However, some parents even went as far as to say they wished she taught their children.

In the controversial TikTok, Pitzen revealed that the Pledge of Allegiance is reading during third-period announcements, and she said that she always tells her class, stand if you feel like it, don’t stand. Say the words if you want, but you don’t have to say the words.

She said, so in her class, if you choose to stand but not say the words, that’s fine, and Pitzen added that her room doesn’t have a flag, as she pivots to the camera and points to the wall in the front of the classroom where the flag used to be, and she said, whispering that she did it because it made her uncomfortable, and took it down during COVID.

She said she packed it away, but can’t remember where, laughing in a way that suggested otherwise, prompting the school district to open an investigation. And Pitzen said that she hadn’t found it yet, and put her hand over her mouth to extinguish a chuckle.

And when a student asked her where the flag was, saying it was sort of weird that they stand and then say the Pledge of Allegiance to nothing, the teacher shrugged it off and told them that she was working on it.

Pitzen should have stayed in her lane as a teacher. Her mission was to develop skills such as Math and English because political and cultural views shouldn’t have been on her list.

This is just brainwashing, and it appears that children are being shoved through the system without basic writing and math skills, and teaching her views was certainly not part of the curriculum.

And children have no future when attention-seeking nincompoops like this woman are permitted to brainwash children’s thoughts. She was a teacher employed to teach, not bootleg her agenda.

Setting her own agenda in her own time was her right. However, it was improper for her to drag her students into towing to her own agenda in school time, and she had no right to force her comfort onto children – why bring children into this stupidity?

And where are they recruiting these teachers from? Perhaps it’s the majority of what these so-called higher institutions of education are churning out. Snowflakes with a sense of entitlement that it makes you want to barf, and it seems that each generation is getting worse.

CDC’s ‘Woke’ New Language Guide

A new guide on inclusive communication by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention to improve health equality has published a long list of words and phrases such as elderly, smokers and poor for less dehumanising language.

The guide includes a list of guiding principles and preferred terms to use rather than seemingly dehumanising ones such as poor and elderly to encourage a continuous shift toward non-stigmatising language.

The guide reads that long-standing systemic social health inequities have put some population groups at heightened risk of getting sick, having overall poor health, and having more serious outcomes when they do get ill and that we should avoid continuing these inequities in communication.

The guide asks health communicators and medical experts to examine how racism and other forms of prejudice unjustly disadvantage people and lead to social and health inequities.

The CDC website reads that language in communication products should reflect and speak to the needs of people in the audience of focus.

The guide gives a list of words in various categories to avoid using and recommends replacements to use instead.

Most of the recommendations are structured to read such as ‘a person with disabilities’ rather than describing someone as ‘disabled.’

In the disability category, the CDC also suggests avoiding the use of ‘differently abled’, ‘afflicted’ and ‘handicapped.’ And rather than calling someone ‘elderly’ or a ‘senior,’ the CDC recommends using the term ‘older adults’ or ‘elders.’

For drug and substance abuse terms, the CDC guide recommends avoiding the terms ‘drug users/addicts/drug abusers’ or ‘alcoholics/abusers.’

Instead, the CDC prefers that they be called terms such as ‘persons with substance use disorder’ or ‘persons with alcohol use disorder’, or even ‘persons in recovery from substance use/alcohol disorder.’

The CDC has even asked for ‘smokers’ to be referred to as ‘people who smoke.’

Meanwhile, poor people should be referred to as ‘people with lower incomes’ or ‘people experiencing poverty.’ And rather than ‘homeless people’ or ‘transient people,’ the CDC suggests referring to them as ‘people experiencing homelessness’ or ‘persons who are not securely housed.’

The CDC has recommended avoiding terms such as ‘mentally ill’ and ‘crazy’ and ‘insane’ while also avoiding using words such as ‘asylum’ in reference to mental hospitals and facilities.

The guide even includes a category for immigration, recommending that medical professionals avoid using such words as ‘illegals’, ‘illegal immigrants,’ and ‘illegal aliens.’

Instead, the CDC prefers dropping the word ‘illegal’ from the description or using words like ‘people with undocumented status’ or ‘foreign-born persons.’

When it comes to crime, the CDC recommends avoiding terms like ‘inmate’ and ‘prisoner’ and ‘criminal’. Instead, the agency prefers words like ‘people who are incarcerated’ or ‘people who were formerly incarcerated.’

The guide also has lengthy categories on topics such as how to refer to people who identify as LGBTQ or people of other races and ethnicities.

Perhaps then, rather than being called ‘woke’, those people should be referred to as ‘off their rocker’ or ‘people who have an absence of common sense.’

But of course, this is all a song and dance that will accomplish absolutely nothing, but undoubtedly these people are paid a small fortune for such rubbish.

Indeed, the solution is to substitute one word that has real meaning, with an entire sentence that has no meaning, and over time, the whole sentence will gain the same connotations as the single word, and then you wonder why no one takes the CDC seriously.

Boris Johnson Ignored Security Guidance

According to legal documents, Prime Minister Boris Johnson disregarded his own national security guidance over the use of a personal mobile phone.

In recent years, Boris Johnson is alleged to have texted both Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman and billionaire Sir James Dyson on his own mobile phone to discuss official business.

This is despite Boris Johnson and senior ministers being warned two years ago not to conduct government business on their personal devices or communication apps.

The revelation comes amid questions over minister’s extensive use of WhatsApp and other messaging apps when conducting government communications.

Ministers were issued with classified advice following the 2019 general election, warning them that both their personal mobile phones and email accounts were at risk of being hacked.

The document titled ‘The Security of Government Business’ was given to ministers after the Conservative Party’s election victory, and was marked ‘Official – Sensitive.’

A newspaper outlet reported that the document warned ministers that their personal IT wouldn’t be as reliable as that issued by government departments.

It also said they shouldn’t use personal devices, email and communication applications for government affairs at any clarification.

The advice issued to ministers was revealed as part of a legal case brought against the government by campaign group Foxglove and the non-profit organisation The Citizens, which were trying to stop ministers from making a major decision over apps like WhatsApp and Signal, where messages can be set to disappear.

Executive director of The Citizens Clara Maguire told a newspaper outlet that it was extraordinary that it had taken their legal action to uncover the fact that the government had a secret policy banning the use of WhatsApp messages and private emails for government affairs.

Cori Crider, Foxglove’s director, questioned whether Boris Johnson had ever bothered to read his own secret policy banning minister’s from using personal devices and applications.

Recent reports have unveiled the extent of minister’s reliance on their personal mobile phones, private email accounts and apps such as WhatsApp when conducting government business.

And it’s been reported that Boris Johnson and the Saudi prince texted about a possible Saudi backed takeover bid for Newcastle United football club.

Meanwhile, Mr Dyson is said to have messaged the Prime Minister to secure favourable tax arrangements for his staff coming to the United Kingdom to supply ventilators amid a shortage during the depths of the coronavirus pandemic.

Does Boris Johnson follow any of the rules? It appears not, and when are people going to accept that he doesn’t give a damn about the country or its people, and it seems that he doesn’t like to listen to anyone or anything – only his own voice!

Perhaps he was begging for some money because clearly, he can’t live on £150,000 but he expects the poor to live on shirt buttons, but yet the immigrants are given homes, health care and benefits amounting to far more than pensioners ever get – it’s no wonder they all want to come to the United Kingdom.

It’s time to get rid of scruffy bumbling Boris Johnson because he ignores what’s staring him in the face all the time and perhaps once people thought he was a smart man, an intelligent man with the veneer of a buffoon, but now people are realising that it was no veneer and the intelligence was abstract, and it’s no shock that gibbering Boris Johnson is cosying up to the moneyed.

New York Air Force Veteran And Her Young Daughter Are Living Out Of Her Car

A landlord in upstate New York has been forced to live out of her car after the tenants of her three properties refused to pay rent for almost a year, while she’s powerless to evict them due to the state and federal moratoriums.

Brandie LaCasse, who’s owed more than $23,000 in uncollected rent from her three properties, hasn’t received rental assistance funds from the government after at least one of her tenants were approved for rental help.

Brandie LaCasse, an Air Force veteran, has been left effectively homeless without the income to support herself and her daughter. The single mother and her daughter have been living out of her car or staying with friends.

She said that she’s cried many nights, thinking, where’s my money, and she added that she didn’t understand how they could give her private property to somebody to live for free, and that she’d purchased that property, and fixed it up with her own blood, sweat and tears.

She said that she invested in the properties, never believing she would never have a place to live and that she just wanted her house, that’s it.

Brandie LaCasse claimed she’d notified her tenants that they needed to move out that she could move in when they chose to quit paying her rent.

Her tenant Carla McArthur, who was approved for rental support, expressed her sympathies for the landlord’s position but told CBS News that she can’t pay rent because of the huge costs for childcare for her daughter and autistic son.

Carla McArthur said that she felt bad that she hadn’t been able to pay Brandie LaCasse, and but they’d gone from two incomes, that she had COVID 19 twice, and that all her children have had it once, and that her husband had it once, and that they’d all been hit by the virus.

Carla McArthur said she worries that Brandie LaCasse will kick her family to the curb when the moratorium has been lifted, leaving them homeless in the process.

Brandie LaCasse’s situation mirrors the current situation for numerous landlords across the country, as the US Treasury Department has noted that almost 90 per cent of rental assistance funds have not been distributed.

New York has only doled out about 8 per cent of the $2.6 billion federally designated for rental assistance to landlords.

The ultimate goal is collectivism, communalism, and the seizure of private property, and the reality is that its radical communism that enables oppression and creates poverty to the masses, and this is terrifying.

Imagine owning three properties and then being homeless because someone else fears they will end up homeless, also knowing that this woman also has a child.

Couldn’t they just come to some agreement whereby they all live in the house, that way nobody is homeless? Otherwise, this becomes evil because numerous families depend on rental revenue, and America’s founding forefathers must be spinning in their graves.

There are many landlords in America, but some renters don’t bother to pay their rent, but the landlord still has to pay all the expenses and can’t remove them.

There is government assistance for tenants to pay their rent but many don’t even bother applying because it’s simply too much trouble and not deserving of their time, since they’re living there rent-free anyhow, and it seems that America is all about compensating freeloaders and cheaters and punishing the hard-working.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started