THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

A film which has been created by a group of Australian reporters has fired a global complaint on Israel after it explicitly mentioned Tel Aviv’s practice of crucifixion upon Palestinian children.

The film named Stone Cold Justice reports how Palestinian kids, who have been caught and arrested by Israeli authorities, are reduced to bodily harm, pain and coerced into fake statements and forced into collecting data on Palestinian activists.

Australia’s foreign minister Julie Bishop has spoken out against Israeli’s treatment of cruelty saying that she was very worried about the charges of the abuse of Palestinian children.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Yigal Palmor has reported the human rights abuses recorded in the film as offensive. However, rights organizations have crashed this report, stating that the Israelis are doing nothing to improve Tel Aviv’s strategy to hurt Palestinian children.

Last year a proclamation by the United Nations International Emergency Children’s Fund or UNICEF decided that Palestinian children are regularly targeted in night arrests and invasions of their habitats, intimidated with death and reduced to corporal injury, isolated imprisonment and sexual attack.

The film Stone Cold Justice has fired a universal objection about Israel’s handling of minors in Israeli prisons.

Nevertheless, rights organizations have scrutinized Tel Aviv for not doing anything to build a strategy that defends Palestinian kids facing arbitrary detention and cruelty.

A woman has declared that the Jewish land was given to them by word of honor god.

The description of the Promised Land was summoned in Negro holies as heaven or paradise and as a freedom from slaveholding, usually which can alone be attained by death.

The representation and expression have further been utilized in traditional culture, sermons and in speeches, such as the “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” (1968) speech by Martin Luther King, Jr:

“I just want to do God’s will. And He’s allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I’ve looked over. And I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land. So I’m happy, tonight. I’m not worried about anything. I’m not fearing any man. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.”

The promise that is the source of the term is held in many verses of Genesis in the Torah. In Genesis 12:1 it is said:

The LORD had said to Abram, “Leave your country, your people and your father’s household and go to the land I will show you.”
and in Genesis 12:7:

The LORD appeared to Abram and told, “To your offspring, or seed I will give this land.”

Critics have noted many difficulties with this agreement and relevant ones:

It is to Abram’s descendants that the land will, in the future tense be provided, not to Abram directly neither there and then. Nevertheless, in Genesis 15:7 it is said: He further said to him, “I am the LORD, who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it.” Nonetheless, how this line relates to the agreements is a subject of debate.

There is nothing in the promise to show God proposed it is implemented to Abraham’s bodily descendants unreservedly, solely to nobody but these descendants, exhaustively, to all of them, or for eternity.

Nevertheless, more than 40 years Israel has dominated the West Bank, but presently there are serious allegations that Palestinian children are being regularly targetted, captured and imprisoned in the struggle to dominate this argued region.

Furthermore, it’s this terror and coercion that makes this method work so efficiently. They never know when there is going to be this bang on the door in the middle of the night.

A new generation of malice in the making. Imagine in any principal city or in any other cultured community, daily late-night attacks on family homes by heavily equipped soldiers to take away children in blindfolds and handcuffs for questioning.

Imagine a military stockade where the prisoners incorporate children as young as twelve are in handcuffs. Such is the deformity of life, in a country of divided peace plans and very implanted hatreds among 2.5 million Palestinians and 350 thousand homesteaders following more than 40 years of military rule.

A UNICEF statement last year discovered that Palestinian children had been abused under questioning by Israeli defense teams, with death, bodily injury, isolated detention and sexual crimes on themselves or a family member, whilst demanding statements for supposed crimes, most commonly, stone throwing.

UNICEF calculates that over the foregoing decade, a percentage of 700 children a year have been arrested, questioned and processed through Israel’s military judiciary system.

This describes the way law is followed with respect to the children of the West Bank.

It’s a quiet nightfall in a tiny Palestinian community, whilst a 14-year-old boy and his family slumber. Quickly the night is destroyed, the Israeli armed forces are making an assault. The victim, the boy who they allege has cast stones at them. His mother remembers that moment.

Each soldier stood at the doorway of a room. The mum was questioning what did they want with him, and she was ordered to shut up. They began beating her son and dragging him out of bed. She informed them that he wanted to get dressed, so she gave him a coat to cover him but the soldier began making jokes and began laughing.

Husayn Zumaya maintains he’s done nothing illegal, but this starts an 18-day ordeal.

Husayn Zumaya stated, there was a large device with electrical cables on it, attached to the electricity. He wanted to give him an electric shock with it. He was forced to the ground and beaten. He further had a whip with a pipe which he was beaten with.

At the age of 15 years old, the life of a different boy has been turned upside down. He didn’t run off because he knew he hadn’t done anything illegal. They opened fire and hit him with three or four rubber bullets. He was also hit with a gas canister.

He spent the following 82 days in prison, starting with a cross-examination. They held electric batons, which they hit him with. One of the officers raised his disguise, and he had all charcoal covering his face and his eyes were all black. He would be talked to, and they would glare at him to frighten him, and they hit him, and they gave him electric shocks.

As a 14-year-old, another person has come up against Israel’s security services. They ordered him to sign papers, and he told him it’s in Hebrew, he couldn’t understand Hebrew, could they explain it to him? They told him it was for his release and that he needed to sign it. After he signed it at the court, he was shocked to find out that it was confession papers.

These boys are part of the new frontline in the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. They’re amongst the 700 Palestinian children brought each year before Israel’s military court.

They never know when there is going to be a bang on the door in the midst of the night and soldiers are going to command that they bring out their children and one of them is taken away.

On to this frontline has stepped Australian lawyer Gerard Horton, he left his practice as a Commercial law barrister in Sydney six years ago. He’s presently heading a crusade to stop a system under which Palestinian children have fewer rights than Israeli children, including being subjected to night-time arrests by heavily armed soldiers.

This has a disabling impact on whole communities and it’s that terror and coercion that makes the policy work so well, with comparatively fewer soldiers on the ground, therefore, it also makes it really a cost effective occupation.

Yigal Palmor stated that there is simply no policy, a policy to generate fear, there is no such thing, this is what came from his mouth. He stated the only policy is to keep law and order, that’s all, and that if there is no valence, there’s no enforcement.

Valence, as applied in psychology, particularly in addressing emotions, suggests the inherent attractiveness, positive valence or aversiveness, negative valence of an event, purpose, or situation.

Nevertheless, the word is further applied to identify and describe particular emotions. For instance, the emotions commonly referred to as negative, such as violence and fear, have a negative valence, and he stated if there is no valence, there is no enforcement.

Ambivalence is a state of having simultaneous adverse opinions, ideas, or attitudes towards something or persons, in the case, the Palestinians.
Said another way, ambivalence is the sense of having an opinion towards somebody or something that carries both positively and negatively valenced components.

However, President Barak Obama announced to Israeli’s last year that the problem will not resolve itself. He stated that we should put ourselves in their shoes, and see the world through their eyes. He announced it was not just that the Palestinian child cannot grow up in a land of their own, living their whole life under the occupation of a foreign militia that dominates the movements, not just of those young people, but their parents, their grandparents every single day.

Nevertheless, leaders of the Israeli settler movement like Daniella Weiss do not accept this. She stated that they came to a land where other people were living, however, she said this land was guaranteed to the Jewish nation by God. She stated, all the other people that live there need to accept Jewish sovereignty in the Promised Land, and this is the only way she see’s it. So, those who accept it, live happily, those who do not accept it, face confrontations.

Those encounters happen essentially adjacent to settlements. In 1967 Israel started seizing the West Bank, also known as the Palestinian areas. Since then, settlements, generally viewed as prohibited under international law have grown to control the West Bank.

Israel maintains they are not prohibited. Therefore, take a situation concerning two children in the West Bank casting stones, one a Palestinian child, the other an Israeli child living in the settlement. The Palestinian child will be prosecuted in a military jurisdiction, with far fewer freedoms and protections, while his Israeli equivalent living sometimes 500 meters away will be prosecuted in a juvenile justice system which satisfies international standards and complies, and is the kind of system you would expect in any western style government.

It is questionable when you recognize there are probably quite young children being detained in the early hours of the morning.

Leftenant Colonel Maurice Hirsh, the Israeli army officer who manages prosecutions at the military court told it’s, sadly, an operational requirement because of the general disruption of the peace that ensues when they attempt to carry out the rest through the day and the disinclination of the Palestinian people to cooperate with the Law enforcement agency.

To understand Israels two separate judicial methods you have to go to Hebron the biggest Palestinian city in the West Bank. There, 800 Israeli settlers live in the center of Hebron enveloped by 180 thousand Palestinians.

It used to be a flourishing Palestinian marketplace and the result of Israel’s control is clear, now it’s a ghost town, and Israeli soldiers will not permit Palestinians to walk along the streets. Palestinians maintain they have been driven out and countless buildings been taken over by the settlers guarded by soldiers.

One Palestinian man desires to be able to walk along the streets. He is from Hebron, and when questioned why he could not the soldier replied that was the order that he has got. The man asked the soldier, because he needed to walk past to go to the cemetery, so that he could attend his father’s grave, and the soldier said that he could not. It appears unusual, that any other person can wander through the streets, however, Palestinians can’t.

It’s early morning in Hebron and Palestinian children are walking to school when abruptly there is tear gas being discharged. The Israeli army announced that it was in response to stone throwing, the stone throwing wasn’t affirmed, but there were Israeli police coming together when suddenly they discharged tear gas in the direction of the children.

There was no provocation from the children who were attempting to bypass the gas. Their teachers said tear gas is fired there almost daily. Every day is similar to that, and the Israeli’s do it to defend their settlement, but the Palestinians simply want to study with their children, and the week before that they had to take children to the hospital because of the gas.

The police were approached however, the police would not divulge anything.

Hebron has long been a flashpoint, and what happens plainly there is one law for Israeli’s and one law for Palestinians is characteristic of the West Bank, and according to Yehuda Shaul who served there as an Israeli army commander said that the DNA of the military operations that is observed in Hebron is seen all over the West Bank.

Yehuda Shaul needed to end his silence, and 950 current and past Israeli combat soldiers are working to stop human rights violations. He told he’s never broken into houses in the middle of the night there in Jerusalem nor tore apart apartments, however, he stated in Hebron where he served for 14 months, 24/7, that’s what they did in order to make their presence known.

Last July one event shocked many. In the streets of Hebron, a 5-year-old boy, Wadi’a was pulled up by soldiers. An Israeli settler had asserted that the boy had tossed a stone at him, the boy’s friend tried to help him, and kept hold of his hand but the soldiers dragged him away and shoved the boy who was trying to help into a door.

The older boy spoke to Wadi’a and told him not to be afraid and that he was with him. The 5-year-old was hugging the older boy in terror and the older boy was upset, he had tears in his eyes but he stopped himself from crying. He simply gripped onto the younger boy.

Wadi’a told that he was simply playing outside, and then a car came. A man said that he had hurled a stone at the car. He said the Jewish man said that he cast a stone at him.

Wadi’a was taken by 6 soldiers but was freed after two hours. One settler making one assertion is able to stimulate this level of military interference upon a 5-year-old. When his father intervened, he is blindfolded.

Even though they know all of them, and they know they are occupants of the region, they do this because this is their way of driving them away, that’s their work, that is what they do. Wadi’a was asked that when he see’s an Israeli soldier in the street, what does he think, he answered that he is afraid of them, and when they took him into the van, he said that he was crying.

Yehuda Shaul stated that from his military days, he doesn’t even remember children, he told that he has some visions of Palestinian children when he broke into houses in the middle of the night and children began to cry, but they are the obscure recollections that Yehuda has from his military service, because simply the notion that there are children and adults is not the thought that you have there, and he stated that when he was in uniform, it was just them and the military.

Consider what you would do if your 5-year-old child was being taken by soldiers, even by your own police. Gaby Lasky is a leading Israeli lawyer who defends Palestinians. She said, if a 5-year-old had been taken by an authority that is not you, you would do everything in your ability to get your child back. Military courts are the long arm of occupation. We are not speaking about Courts of Justice, we are speaking about Courts of occupation.

Yehuda Shaul grew up thinking that actions as a Military in the occupied territories were there to defend Israel from terrorism, what he’s seen from his three years of service and 9 years of activism and breaking the silence following studying data of above 950 soldiers is that the central story is about keeping full military power over Palestinians.

Palestinians maintain the soldiers are working in harmony with the settlers. Settlers assault Palestinian children while soldiers stand by. Furthermore, a settler fires active ammo, hitting a Palestinian youth on the side of the head, again soldiers stand by.

When you see a settler attacking a Palestinian, soldiers orders are not to intervene.

Palestinian children encounter a threat on two aspects. Neither rests from the army and brutality from settlers. To get to school each day they must walk past a settler outstation, and strikes from settlers have become so serious that the army accompanies the children, but the school has closed early and the army has not turned up.

Presently, the children are on their own, their only security is an Israeli aide who believes that by bringing a camera he will discourage the settlers.

As a Jewish Israeli he can’t explain it in words since he feels somewhat bad since he’s a holocaust survivor since and his grandfather was a holocaust survivor, he was a sympathetic, he ran away for several years and all his family died in the holocaust and he doesn’t get it from one who has experienced from all atrocities how Israeli’s shifted to the people that are making other people suffer for Israel’s behaviour, it’s incredible.

Human behavior can be irrational at times since we are just really stupid people that require an armed force and have created a war on innocent people, just because they want to be on a stage.

As the intermittent battle continues in the Middle East, the quest for an impartial resolution must come to grips with the source of the dispute. The common reason is that, even if both sides are to blame, the Palestinians are illogical terrorists who have no point of view that merits listening to.

The situation, though, is that the Palestinians have a genuine complaint, their motherland for over a thousand years was taken, without their permission and mostly by force, during the conception of the state of Israel.

Furthermore, all succeeding violations, on both sides, inevitably result from this fundamental violation.

The approved Zionist situation is that they showed up in Palestine in the late 19th century to reclaim their tribal motherland. Jews purchased land and began developing the Jewish population there. They were faced with increasingly powerful resistance from the Palestinian Arabs, probably originating from the Arabs’ intrinsic anti-Semitism.

The Zionists were then obliged to protect themselves and, in one form or another, this same position remains up to today.

The dilemma with this story is that it is just not correct. What actually occurred was that the Zionist movement, from the start, looked forward to a substantially total dispossession of the native Arab people so that Israel could be a totally Jewish state or as much as was reasonable.

Land acquired by the Jewish National Fund was held in the name of the Jewish people and could never be sold or even leased back to Arabs, a position which remains to the present.

The Arab population, as it grew more conscious of the Zionists’ plans, vigorously questioned additional Jewish immigration and land purchasing since it posed a real and immediate threat to the very survival of Arab society in Palestine.

Because of this competition, the whole Zionist scheme never could have been accomplished without the armed backing of the British. The broad bulk of the inhabitants of Palestine, by the way, had been Arabic since the seventh century A.D, over 1200 years.

In short, Zionism was based on a flawed, colonialist world opinion that the rights of the native settlers didn’t matter. The Arabs’ hostility to Zionism wasn’t based on anti-Semitism but preferably on a completely rational concern of the dispossession of their people.

Seems like they existed pretty freely amongst one another before Zionists came along and threw a spanner in the works and declared all-out hostilities toward the Palestinians. What happened to love thy neighbor, now it’s let’s fake to love you, while we blow you all up, now they simply blow each other up, including their children, parents, grandparents, and other mother f*ckers they can get their hands on.

Merely to make things quite apparent, when the Jews and Zionists are all dead, you can’t take the land with you, it will still be there when you are dead and buried. Will it make you live longer, of course not, will it get you into the Kingdom of heaven, of course not?

Thou shalt not kill, that’s what is states in the Testament, I’m sure I’ve read it someplace before on my ramblings, only my wanderings as a Jew did not mean I could murder a child or an innocent grandmother. My hands are clean, I didn’t kill anyone because I fancied a bit of land, and I stamped my feet like a spoilt child because I couldn’t have it.

Did I get out my AK47 and blow somebodies brains out, no I didn’t because I’m not a greedy child with nothing else better to do with my time. Yes, I’ll be shunned for writing this article, but who cares, eventually death will take its toll, and I might even get to those pearly gates, you just never know, but even if I don’t, at least I’ll not have blood on my hands.

Of course, I don’t believe in God as such, but I do believe this. This land that we live on is not ours, it does not belong to us, it is here for us to live upon in unity and peace, to sustain and manage, so that prospective generations can live on it in union and balance, the circle of life, to go round and round, until it all ends.

It doesn’t really belong to anyone, it’s on loan, however, we plainly appear to want to tarnish it as much as possible because as human beings, we are really greedy people that want more and more.

There are specific laws that we were given so that we could live by them, they were called the 10 Commandments. I don’t honestly know if they ever truly existed. Sorry, I don’t have a crystal ball to hand, all I do know is that they have been handed down over centuries, perhaps for a special purpose because somebody or something recognized that when life was formed or designed, it was created with one significant defect, and that was a total and absolute indulgence.

To fight for a country that actually isn’t yours, to murder innocent people is genocide, but if you called an Israeli Jew Hitler, I believe they would get slightly upset.

Whilst there has been the recent criticism of those taking the view that Israel is perpetrating genocide against Palestinians, there is a long history of human rights research and legal study that confirms the contention.

Leading scholars of the international law crime of genocide and human rights authorities take the view that Israel’s tactics toward the Palestinian people could form a kind of genocide. Those policies range from the 1948 mass murder and displacement of Palestinians to a half-century of military rule and, correspondingly, the discriminatory legal regime ruling Palestinians, repeated military attacks on Gaza, and official Israeli reports explicitly supporting the removal of Palestinians.

Genocide is a word that has both sociological and legal definition. The word genocide was invented in 1944 by a Jewish Polish legal scholar, Raphael Lemkin. For Lemkin, the term does not necessarily mean mass murders.

More frequently, genocide points to a coordinated system directed at the removal of the fundamental foundations of the life of social groups so that these groups die and perish like plants that have suffered a disease. The end may be achieved by the coerced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings, and their belief.

It may be achieved by wiping out all basis of individual protection, freedom, well-being, and dignity. When these means fail the machine gun can always be used as a last option. Genocide is directed against a national group as an entity and the assault on individuals is only secondary to the annihilation of the national group to which they belong.

Following Lemkin’s first citation of the word, it has got a political, social, and legal interest. For political experts, historians, and sociologists, genocide is recognized as a primary example of collective violence, with a unique spot in the rainbow of political brutality, armed opposition, and conflict, of which it is normally regarded as a part.

From a legal view, genocide, like the crime against mankind of murder, is an international violation identified by the particular intention to separate into a group on perceived grounds through a sequence of actions or omissions usually reflected in and managed within State systems.

Whilst different in scope, both genocide and murder, reduce a person to their identification with or membership in a gathering, but further attack the gathering itself. Abuse criminalizes the denial of basic freedoms for members of the group, and genocide criminalizes the most violent degree of prejudice, attempts to truly defeat the crowd.

According to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, genocide involves many actions performed with the intention to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such, comprising, killing branches of the group, causing severe physical or mental injury to branches of the group.

Intentionally inflicting on the assembly conditions of life determined to bring about its physical devastation in whole or in part, and forcing actions designed to stop births inside the group.

This interpretation is shown in Article 6 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which has authority over violations happening in the area of the State of Palestine since June 13, 2014.

The Genocide Convention was addressed in the repercussions of World War II and the aversions of the Holocaust, mainly to stop and limit such horrors in the tomorrow and, failing that, to discipline those accountable.

The Convention, therefore, granted a legal structure that explicitly recognizes the nature of the offense of genocide, regardless of the political, social, or cultural changes in which the offense may be endeavored or carried out and despite the particular qualities, stage, or scale of the genocidal method.

The Holocaust established the terms by which a kind of widespread or prevalent brutality toward a group might be legitimately named genocide as a broad sociological thought as it need not indicate a connection to any other particular event.

Scholars of genocide have recognized it as a crime different from other kinds of conflict, killing, brutality, prejudice, and control. Genocidal action aims not just to contain, manage, or subordinate a society, but to destroy and divide up its social continuation.

Therefore genocide is defined, not by a singular kind of brutality, but by general and prevalent brutality. It is noted that settler colonial regimes are structurally predisposed to genocide, and can coddle in genocidal moments when they become defeated by the resistance of a settled or occupied people.

The word genocide has been applied to characterize the mass killing of Armenians by the Ottomans, Stalin’s removal of Chechens, Ingush Tartars, and Jews from the U.S.S.R., the elimination of Jews and Hungarians from Romania, and Italy’s attempts to free Slovenes and Croats from the Dalmatian coast.

There have been successful prosecutions of people for genocide occurring out of attempts to destroy the Tutsi people in Rwanda in 1994 and Srebrenica in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1995.

Many leading human rights professionals, advocates, and scholars have declared that Israel’s tactics and operations with regard to the Palestinian people have resulted to a kind of genocide.

With regard to the creation of the Israeli nation in 1948, there has been a strong scholarly discussion about if the settlement of Jews and the removal of Palestinians in Mandate Palestine could be defined as genocide. We can assume that pre-war Zionism entailed the construction of an incipiently genocidal comprehension towards Arab culture.

Israel penetrated lacking an overarching plan, so that its specific genocidal assaults began situationally and incrementally, inside local as well as national decisions. On this reckoning, this was a little decentered, webbed genocide, growing in interaction with the Palestinian and Arab enemy, in the context of war.

In 2010, the Journal of Genocide Studies entertained a discussion between Martin Shaw and another leading scholar of genocide, on whether the name genocide could be reasonably implemented to the Israeli behavior towards Palestinians, especially the removal and murder of Arabs in 1948.

The two scholars took vastly diverse views on the issue, but the journal denied grievances from some areas that it was illegal, or worse, a biased issue to pose and question at all.

The Palestinians have been the victims of genocide as outlined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

For over the past six and one-half decades, the Israeli administration and its forerunners in law, the Zionist agencies, forces, and terrorist groups, have ruthlessly executed a precise and extensive military, political, religious, economic, and cultural attack with the intention to destroy in large part the national, ethnical, racial, and various religious group, Jews versus Muslims and Christians, creating the Palestinian people.

When the general population approved legal laws that would control the operations of occupying authorities while further defending the justices of occupied peoples and nations/states, it was recognized that military rule would be a short-lived necessity assistant to armed struggle and that the occupying army would be removed at the end of the fight.

Israel’s continued aggressive control of the West Bank, comprising East Jerusalem, and Gaza for 50 years far transcends the sort of control that encouraged the formulation of legal practices of control contained in international law.

Given the apparently robust reality of the Israeli invasion of the West Bank and Gaza, some human rights specialists, including Israeli historian Ilan Pappé, have warned of an incremental genocide of Palestinians and the final end of Palestinians as a national group.

This incremental genocide within the methods and practices that have both supported and accepted as the endorsements of Israel’s control is achieved, they contend, by a normalization of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory and the expulsion or absorption of the national organization of people who identify as Palestinian.

International legislation is explicit that an occupying authority may not annex the people or area it controls.

There’s no uncertainty here that this is incremental genocide. It’s been going on for an extended time, the murder of people, the amazingly poor conditions of life, the exiles that have gone on from Lydda in 1947 and ‘48, when 700 or more communities in Palestine were destroyed, and in the exiles that proceeded from that time until today.

It’s true and necessary to identify it for what it is. Furthermore, we need to highlight today that these crimes are a component of a larger collection of cruel actions by Israel organizing international atrocities, carried out by Israel over numerous years, going back to at least 1947 and 1948.

They encompass violations that aren’t discussed that much in the media or the newspapers, the atrocities of genocide, violations upon mankind, and apartheid. These crimes can be contested in the International Criminal Court and are defined there.

The Russell Tribunal on Palestine, a nongovernmental people’s body made up of leading international human rights masters and advocates, gathered between November 2010 and September 2014 to examine the issue of human rights crimes in the connection of the Israeli invasion of the West Bank, comprising East Jerusalem, and Gaza.

It took testimony and pondered particularly on the issue of if Israel may have perpetrated genocide in connection to the Palestinian people. The panel decided that some Israeli settlers and leaders may have been guilty in some cases of the separate violation of provocation to genocide, which is defined in Article 3(c) of the Genocide Convention.

The combined result of the long-standing administration of cumulative suffering in Gaza seems to inflict conditions of life thought to bring about the incremental removal of the Palestinians from a society in Gaza. The Tribunal highlights the potential for an administration of oppression to become genocidal as a result.

With regard to Israel’s most recent military offensive, the so-called Operation Protective Edge set upon Gaza in the summer of 2014, important human rights authorities showed concern that the military operations constituted a breach of the international humanitarian law as included in the Geneva Conventions.

Amnesty International announced a declaration declaring an International Criminal Court (ICC) examination was crucial to shatter the perception of impunity which kept alive the commission of war crimes and crimes against humankind in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

The case for such action is made all the more enthralling in the knowledge of the ongoing serious breach of international humanitarian legislation being perpetrated by all individuals to the prevailing hatreds in the Gaza Strip and Israel.

The ICC has authority over genocide, and the U.N. Special Advisers on the Prevention of Genocide published a declaration two weeks into the 2014 attack that they were outraged by the blatant use of hatred discourse in the social media, especially upon the Palestinian people, observing that people have distributed communications that could be dehumanizing to the Palestinians and have ordered the killing of members of this organization, whilst warning all that motive to perpetrate murder atrocities is forbidden under international legislation.

Al-Haq, the oldest Palestinian Human Rights group, determined that severe breaches of international law were perpetrated in the course of the 2014 Israeli offensive against Gaza. Al-Haq, simultaneously with other Palestinian human rights groups the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, Al-Mezan, and Aldameer presented a legal dossier to the International Criminal Court asking it to initiate an inquiry and prosecution into the atrocities against mankind and war violations perpetrated throughout the course of Israel’s 2014 Gaza attack.

The violations suggested for prosecution by these human rights organizations include genocide.

Handfuls of Holocaust survivors, collectively with hundreds of offspring of Holocaust survivors and victims, blamed Israel of genocide for the deaths of more than 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza throughout the 2014 Israeli military attack on Gaza, “Operation Protective Edge.

Hundreds of people perished in the Holocaust, and it’s wrong that Israel should be doing the equivalent to the Palestinians, we should have learned from what occurred in World War 2, and it should have made us understand that it should never happen again.

Nevertheless, it appears that we have not learned at all since the Israeli’s are hell bent on destroying the Palestinian people and they are making them suffer. This home that the Israeli’s and the Palestinian’s live on should belong to both, they should both be permitted to walk on it, live on it, work on it, labor on it, it should belong to everyone.

After all, they can’t take it with them, but they believe that it belongs to them by virtue, so they go about murdering innocent men, women, and children in the process to acquire a portion of land.

We swore that these crimes would never happen again, but we appear to want to hold these people to ransom when all they want is some freedom, but now it’s too late since this country is steeped in conflict, stirred by hatred and disorder.

Their departure from the truth and the notoriety that they accomplish is all the recognition that they require, the playhouse of death, to ensconce prejudice which can never have a positive result. If the Palestinians protest they then become a scapegoat, but it appears more than that now.

To drag innocent children from their beds at night whilst they are asleep because Israeli soldiers have said that they have launched stones at them is a bit extreme. It’s a military organization and nothing more, to browbeat and abuse through unadulterated pleasure, and as we obtain the information of this we must recognize that this conduct is just corrupt.

Ultimately, there will be no way back, since there must be a crucial moment when we must stop this war once and for all. This fight for land must end!

I do have sympathy for both sides, however, when it comes down to it, it is complete and absolute selfishness that makes this battle go on. This country is plentiful, and many people can live there peacefully if they so wished to do so, but they have made a complex situation into a war zone.

There are two situation’s that could befall them, we could either pull out and let them get on with it, or if they can’t all live together in agreement, maybe Israeli’s or Palestinian’s should not live there at all, and they should both be eliminated.

Nevertheless, genocide is unconstitutional, and that would never happen, however, we have no difficulty letting them annihilate each other, torture children, and take children from their beds in the middle of the night, that appears to be acceptable. The only way to triumph is to allow the Palestinian’s to have what they want, or for somebody to come in and tell each, the Israeli’s and Palestinian’s what they can have, and that if there is controversy in the land they will be incarcerated – each and every one of them.

Prejudice ferments in this land, and we must recognize that this is a no-win situation. There is no fault finding here, nobody is right and nobody is in the wrong, both parties believe that it belongs to them, however, they are so wrong, and I decline to accept that each side truly wants to fight unendingly.

I don’t usually here of people putting their hands in their pockets to do something nice, and it doesn’t even have to be about giving money, simply being there for somebody over Christmas is enough. However, one chip shop in Birmingham unlocked its doors on Christmas Day to feed the destitute and aging.

Brothers Asef and Hamid Faqiri delved into their own pockets to give a turkey meal with all the accessories. There was additionally to be free fish and chips for those craving anything simpler. The brothers have observed so many destitute people around them that they really wanted to do anything to help them.

There are also many old people who don’t have any families and will be on their own on Christmas Day. So they chose to open up primarily for them, to induce some Christmas joy. Staff prepared and served up a legendary turkey feast in takeaway cartons to hand out to anybody who turned up between 1 pm and 4 pm.

A sign was put up in the shop window announcing the event. It was distributed extensively on social media and the brothers further asked their patrons to spread the word.

This is very inspiring, and I have not observed compassion like this in a really long time, and I give these brothers an enormous thumbs up, for what we call kindness towards another human being. The British people would never conceive of doing anything so thoughtful and kind, but these brothers have moved oceans to feed the less fortunate and aged who were are going to be on their own at Christmas.

Danniella Westbrook has been spotted sobbing in the streets just weeks following losing her home and car, but she’s nevertheless clasping on to her designer handbag. The ex-EastEnders actress, whose fight with cocaine resurfaced only last month when she told of her deterioration and was seen walking the streets of Liverpool in tears, covered by a grey jumper, baseball hat and skinny jeans and pulling a suitcase behind her.

Danielle sat on her baggage as she made a telephone call, and was seen drying off tears as she made her way out of a hotel. She had her £1,200 Louis Vuitton handbag hoisted over one shoulder and her long, brunette locks were mopped up into a ponytail.

The 43-year-old actress appeared on This Morning in November 2016 to set the record straight about her unusual lifestyle. She maintained she’d overdosed when her companion George Arnold walked out the preceding month and blamed him of cheating on her, prompting her to attempt hara-kiri.

In the corresponding week as her talk show debut, Danniella was observed wearing medical dressings under her snout, firing reports that she had returned to the drug that made her septum fall out back in 2000.

However, when Philip Schofield invited her to explain what transpired with her overdose, she revealed it was pills she had taken. That she had overdosed on tablets, and that it wasn’t cocaine. She further went on to say that when you lapse and you take drugs, you don’t consider your children.

However, despite putting the viewer’s minds at rest, she stated she was getting her life back on course, but only weeks later it appeared she was being made homeless, again. I don’t actually think the spectators are going to fret about whether she is homeless again, and I don’t suppose she even put the viewer’s minds at rest, she is simply a VIP that highlighted in Eastenders for a very short time.

The spectators are going to dig into their Christmas meal with no thought to Danniella Westbrook. The concept of starving Daniella swaggering her stuff on the streets over the Christmas season will have no importance to the British people at all.

They might giggle and give a suppressed laugh because they will all state the same thing, she was in charge of her own fate, nobody put the cocaine up her nostrils, she did that all by herself, and if she is doing this to herself repeatedly, then she is the one to blame.

It is alleged that Danniella was unable to keep up repayments on her home, and as a consequence is currently staying, here, there and everywhere. Evidently, she’s been busy viewing but hasn’t found her new home.

Clearly, the timing isn’t great with it being so near to Christmas but evidently, she isn’t rushing into anything and is remaining with friends and family over the celebratory season. Homes are really pricey, therefore perhaps she should auction her handbag to pay for one?

Danniella Westbrook would have no concept of what it’s actually like to stay on the streets, and if she laid off the drugs, she wouldn’t be in that situation in the first place, but there’s a suggestion there someplace that it’s definitely an excellent tactic to get money from the tabloids because I’m confident they are providing her rather well for the press coverage.

Furthermore, apparently, she isn’t on the streets, as it has been announced that she is visiting with friends and family, again more newspaper coverage for a fantasy that isn’t really reliable. Apparently, the papers are treating paying readers like idiots because it’s a paid staged shoot.

Danniella Westbrook has made a great amount of money from her years in show business, enough to own her own home I’m sure, but of course, with most of it going up her nostrils, no wonder she’s got no home and no car.

Of course, she needs guidance, there is no questioning that, however, some people don’t want any guidance, they just need the recognition, and some also covet the attention, it makes them feel good about themselves, even more, important than being on Eastenders.

It’s clearly all a very big publicity stunt, and this story is so ridiculous this time of year. Stars short of money get the naive media to take pictures of them apparently in desperate need. Homeless, but visiting with friends over the festive season, what a deceptive fabrication.

However, this is meant to be the season of goodwill, let’s not knock someone down who is grieving and suicidal.

Something unique makes humans the prime species of the planet. It’s not our exceptional brain size, but our capacity to envision the future. This ability teaches us to think unlike other animals and sequentially triumph over them. And, yet, a limitation of this distinctive talent might also spell our downfall.

At a conference in Paris, world leaders are scratching their heads about how we can deal with the looming threat posed by global warming. Our energy-thirsty civilization is drinking fossil fuels at an unsustainable pace and we are soon to run out our carbon resources.

If we don’t act soon, harmful outcomes are prophesied, climbing sea levels, severe weather situations, easy-to-spread diseases and so on. However, Arnold Schwarzenegger makes it plain, despite our capacity to create a dystopia. Stuff that occurs in the future does not imply anything to people. It’s a limitation that could severely hamper a favorable result in Paris.

One way out may be to reframe the dispute. Global warming will affect billions of generations in time to come. However, by one calculation, our desire for fossil fuels may already be accountable for more mortality than those created by wars, murders, and traffic accidents combined.

These numbers come from the 2012 Climate Vulnerability Monitor. In 2010, some 4.5 million mortalities could be connected to air pollution, because of the production of carbon particles and nitrogen oxides. Another 500,000 losses that year could be associated with variations in our environment, which pointed to severe weather situations, flare-ups in communicable infections, and other harmful happenings.

Of course, things are only going to get worse. Although few people will realize what worse will seem like in the future. It’s much more beneficial to study how our fossil fuel usage is now affecting the planet and its citizens and act immediately.

Seven million people die each year global because of pollution-related diseases, that’s more than car accidents, more from suicides, and murders and wars, and all those things collectively, and we are assured that combating pollution involves severe regulations that will disable industry.

Politicians, they maintain that it’s too expensive to fix. Visualize, how stupid for a politician in Washington, to speak about too expensive, they like to waste money, and you know something else? Some politicians even want to shut down the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) power to control carbon. This is complete garbage, it’s all false.

In California, they have proved that they can do both, preserve the environment and the economy at the same time. After California announced stringent climate change legislation, the state’s economy rose by 2.4%.

The most current efforts have been to recognize how the method of changing to 100% renewable power will impact society. Furthermore, we must not only study the dilemma of a power supply, but how to produce enough solar panels and wind turbines, and more at how we manage energy and how simple or complicated it will be to change to the food system, the transportation system, manufacturing, and so on, to using renewable energy. Of course, solar and the wind are direct sources of electricity so we will need to electrify as much of our energy usage as we can.

Furthermore, the construction of highways, which is a large slice of the infrastructure, is currently reliant on two materials that are difficult: one is concrete, and another is asphalt. Asphalt, of course, is made directly from fossil fuels, particularly low-grade oil. Furthermore concrete, its chief constituent is cement, which is created at extremely great temperatures, around 1500 degrees Celsius, in large ovens that are fired with fossil fuels, normally coal, sometimes natural gas.

If we’re simply imagining modernizing our infrastructure by replacing it with more of the same, then I believe we’re fastening personally into investments that actually don’t have much of a prospect. We’re going to have to consider what infrastructure makes sense in a forthcoming civilization that’s mostly controlled by renewable energy sources that may be limited, and that we’ll be utilizing resources probably much more efficiently, and then put money into it respectively.

Fossil fuels, which produce 85% of our popular power, experience from two deadly shortcomings. One of which is the reality that they create greenhouse gasses that are threatening the viability of our environment and hence our future of industrial society.

Another disadvantage of fossil fuels is evidence that these are wasting, non-renewable supplies. So, one way or another we will be shifting away from fossil fuels as time goes on, it’s really an issue of if we do it in a designed and fashioned way, or merely wait until we can no longer manage to extract the material that’s left.

There’s growing experience with combining greater levels of renewable power into grid systems. This greater level of practical knowledge is taking place in European nations, in the United States that have comparatively large levels of renewable penetration, comprising California.

However, there are still hurdles remaining.

Last Wednesday the Conservatives put you and your family in danger. Confronted with strong data proving that the NHS is on the verge of financial meltdown, the government disregarded the requests of patients and the advice of doctors and nurses.

Instead, Theresa May declined to give a single additional penny to preserve our NHS or striving social care structure when the Tories’ Autumn Statement spending policies were revealed. Furthermore, they made it plain they intended to stop the prevailing triple lock incomes protection for pensioners.

The NHS is the health service respected across the globe.

No matter your age or wealth, when you or your child is sick our medical institutions and our GPs are there when you require them. Following six misused Tory years, our hospitals will be around £30 billion in the red by 2020.

The government is pushing hospitals to draft up ideas for what services they will cut.

So far the plans incorporate decreasing the amount of Accident and Emergency departments by half. Maternity services will be slashed and thousands of beds lost. If you reside in Birmingham you currently have four hospitals, under these proposals that will be cut by half, leaving two hospitals to care for over a million people.

The A&E Unit in Huddersfield is one of many facing closures.

In southwest, London, busy St George’s, which highlights on Channel 4’s 24 hours in A&E, is on a shortlist of potential hospital closures. With waiting times rising, and four million people on waiting lists now is not the time to be cutting our health service, we must invest in it.

Apparently, a Labour government will adequately support the NHS, give parity to physical and mental health, and integrate social care to ease the dilemma of bed blocking.

There is an alternative to cuts, closures, and creeping privatisation. That’s why Labour is maintaining that they are putting the NHS front and centre stage.

Now Labour members are holding over 550 separate NHS events nation-wide. Furthermore, they are inviting people to add their voice, to improve care for our NHS.

You know something’s wrong when an eight-year-old girl wrote a tragic message to MPs questioning why a life-saving cancer medicine isn’t free and available after a family friend was diagnosed with the illness. Daisy, couldn’t understand why cancer medications aren’t free on the NHS in Wales but were free in England.

When her mum’s friend Carolyn was told she was terminal, Daisy began composing a letter to Vaughan Gething AM, Cabinet Secretary for Health, Wellbeing, and Sport, asking him to give medication to patients.
Carolyn was diagnosed with breast cancer while pregnant with her youngest child, Mira, in 2015.

The mum-of-two had to endure chemotherapy whilst pregnant to shrink the tumour, and had a mastectomy following her daughter’s birth.

Fewer than two months later, Carolyn was delivered the crushing announcement that cancer had reached to her liver and lung, and was now terminal.

She began an online petition to gather funds for life-saving medicines not available on the NHS in Wales and has raised more than £60,000.
Nevertheless, with one medication alone costing more than £5,000 every three weeks, she must raise almost £100,000 more to pay for a year’s worth of medicine.

When Carolyn’s friend’s daughter, Daisy, learned about her plight, she chose to take things into her own hands. Daisy’s mum Sarah told she was making Christmas cards in the kitchen to raise funds when the little girl questioned what she was doing.

They’re an open family, so she understood all about Carolyn, and when she told her that not all medications are free in Wales, the little girl couldn’t get her head round it, and she questioned what she could do.

So, she wrote a letter to the Government. It was posted, but ash hasn’t heard anything back.

In the letter, Daisy writes: “Dear the Government.”

“Why are the cancer tablets lots of money?

“It’s not fair because in England the tablets are free. Why did you choose to make the tablets cost?

“It is not fair for people who have some cancer in Wales. It’s very sad for me and my mum because my mummy’s friend Carolyn has cancer. She had it when she was pregnant and had a baby. Then she was fine.

“But soon after she had cancer again and she had lots of treatment. But she also needs those tablets so will you please make them free.”

Daisy had always been a kind girl and needed to improve things one step at a time. She’s a really kind young lady and has a tender heart. If people aren’t healthy, she studies about things quite a lot.

But the letter is merely a start for this promising diplomat as she’s presently contemplating beginning an appeal at her school in Coychurch, Bridgend.

Daisy, who is in Year 4, thinks that it’s sad for people with cancer, and it’s not fair for people in Wales, and she wants it to change.

A Welsh Government spokesperson stated that they can’t comment on specific cases or the conclusions or views of clinicians, wow, that’s passing the buck. Furthermore, the spokesperson announced that they are proud of making certain that sufferers have entrance to evidence-based, clinically cost-effective medications, not simply cancer.

Quite clearly they don’t, otherwise, Carolyn would have had those medications free of charge, and is this a deliberate act to suppress life? What are the drawbacks to giving medication to cancer suffers free of charge? Well, there aren’t any, and it really makes you question, when you actually sit down and study it, if there hasn’t been a cure for cancer all along, or at least for several years that nobody has been told about.

To hold life-saving medicines away from sufferers is unethical, and so far, it all comes down to funds and where you live. They can fabricate the facts as much as they like, but we need to dismantle those facts so that we can build a genuine system.

This sweet small girl needs to make the planet a safer place, and out of the mouth of babes, comes the truth.

However, if you come from the aristocracy, or are well-bred, you can have everything you want since you have the funds to pay for it, except for those that don’t have much at all, and cannot afford it, it’s not free.

This inoffensive lady just needs medicine that is out there to be free of charge, it’s not much to ask surely? However, what you have to bare in mind is, that it’s a postcode raffle, if you’re not in the right area, then you get nothing free, it’s all a gamble of uncertainty.

It’s all about making a profit, and spending out money for free on human beings is not one of them, too much expense and nothing coming back to them, what a disgrace, and because of that, they are leaving innocent people who are dying from cancer to just get on with it until eventually, they die, and of course once they are gone, nobody actually disputes why it occurred, since they are dead.

Notably promoted on Facebook and different social media is the belief that a medicine for cancer has been discovered but is being crushed. The purpose given for the suppression is completely the same. The assumption is that businesses stand to make extra cash by treating a lifelong condition than from curing it.

It’s a simple design with a simple appeal, however, the assumptions are staggeringly convoluted.

There have unquestionably been a number of conspiracy theories over the years that have turned out not to be true. Nevertheless, the revelation is that a great number of really notable conspiracy theories have turned out to really be reliable.

So the next time that you run into some tin foil hat wearing maniacs, you might want to actually listen to what they have to say. They may actually know some things that you do not. In fact, one new research discovered that conspiracy theorists are really saner than the overall population.

So, the next time you are tempted to disregard somebody as a conspiracy theorist, simply remember that the one that is insane might really be you.

The CDC has suddenly removed a page from their website, which is presently saved here, indicating that more than 98 million Americans got one or more doses of polio vaccine inside an 8-year span when a proportion of the vaccine was infected with cancer causing polyomavirus called SV40.

It has been determined that 10-30 million Americans could have got an SV40 contaminated dose of the vaccine.

SV40 is an acronym for Simian vacuolating virus 40 or Simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is discovered in both monkeys and humans. Similar additional polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been discovered to cause tumors and cancer.

Awkward and slow cash machines with clunky buttons and tiny hard-to-see screens could soon be a thing of the past thanks to a series of next-generation ATMs.

Ohio-based security firm Diebold has built a touchscreen cash machine that works like a tablet computer, and uses facial identification and QR codes to identify and verify users, and has built-in safety cameras – who’s looking at you, kid!

A shocking new investigative paper from the biggest daily newspaper in Germany claims that Monsanto, the US Military, and the US government have conspired to follow and meddle both anti-GMO activists and objective scientists who examine the adverse impacts of genetically modified food.

Supposedly, new fangled cyber war is being conducted by both eco-activists and independent scientists by followers and previous workers of Monsanto, who are defined as operationally powerful assistants and who have taken up sometimes high-ranking jobs in the US administration, regulatory authorities, and some of who have contacts deep inside the military industrial establishment, including the CIA.

The amount of genetically modified (GM) animals employed in scientific studies in Britain has surpassed a number of normal laboratory animals for the first time, according to official statistics that reveal a 9 percent all-inclusive rise in the management of laboratory animals last year.

Some 4,033,310 animals were employed in scientific experiments begun in 2012, an advance of 322,689, or 9 percent over the previous year. There were 1.91 million scientific procedures practiced with GM animals in 2012 opposed to 1.68.m procedures on healthy animals.

Not long ago, Chinese scientists inserted genes for human milk proteins into a mouse’s genome and have since created herds of humanized-milk-producing goats. In the meantime, researchers at the University of Michigan have a way of putting a human anal sphincter into a mouse as a means of discovering better methods for fecal incontinence, and doctors are building animals with humanized immune systems to help as subjects for new HIV vaccines.

Federal workers and contractors are required to pay special attention to the lifestyles, attitudes, and behaviors, like financial problems, irregular working hours or unexplained travel of co-workers as a way to predict whether they might do harm to the United States.

Managers of special insider threat offices will have regular, timely, and, if possible, electronic, access to workers’ personnel, payroll, disciplinary and personal contact files, as well as records of their use of recorded and unclassified computer networks, polygraph results, travel records, and financial disclosure forms.

The Department of Health and Human Services and Environmental Protection Agency are proposing the change because of a rise in fluorosis, a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children’s teeth. Nevertheless, we have identified that fluoride in our water and in our toothpaste has been dangerous for us for years, but we still continue to use it, why?

At the greatest vulnerability levels, using a mobile phone half an hour a day across a 10-year span, the research discovered a 40 percent increased chance of glioma brain tumors.

Prescription medications eliminate some 200,000 Americans every year. Will that number go up, now that the largest clinical tests are conducted abroad, on sick Russians, homeless Poles, and slum-dwelling Chinese, in areas where regulation is essentially nonexistent, the F.D.A. doesn’t reach, and mistakes can end up in pauper’s graves?

The act of doing any research on animals is wrong. Furthermore, if you think people believe this is not an act of abuse why aren’t the public lining up to be utilised for the experiments? Human beings still must learn to value all forms of life.

If you debate about the role of pharmaceutical companies in the treatment of mental health. There is indeed a remarkable confusion between drug companies and the medical occupation. On the one hand, the drug manufacturing develops new medication and encourages drug use in order to make money.

On the other hand, the medical service prescribes these medicines in order to treat people. One might believe that there would be a strong symbiotic connection between these two organisations. However, dismally there is emerging proof that this is not the situation and that the relationship is especially unhealthy in the case of drugs used for mental ill health. This situation stems from faults on both sides, and also from government policy.

In the 1950s a whole army of psychotropic drugs, drugs that alter the mind, entered the medical scene. These involved major sedatives such as chlorpromazine (Largactil), since developed into a series of antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, tricyclics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, presently joined by the SSRIs such as Prozac, and so-called secondary tranquillisers, the benzodiazepines, Valium and Librium, now which includes a number of Z-drug hypnotics such as zopiclone and others.

These initial findings were quite interesting at the time, as they appeared to guarantee a remedy for all mental disorders. Schizophrenics using antipsychotics could be let out of the hospital to live, presumably securely, in society.

Subjects with depression could, supposedly, be released from self-destructive feelings and from the perceived peril of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Furthermore, the secondary or primary stresses of life could be completely restored with quiet and calm sleep induced by benzodiazepines.

One prominent neurologist, Sir Henry Miller, also wrote that from now on all mental disease could be corrected with a few tablets and there would be no demand for psychiatrists.

At the same time, it was thought, by a kind of stupid reasoning, that the reason of mental sickness would be shown by these medications. Antipsychotics were determined to prevent brain receptors for the neurotransmitter dopamine, consequently, schizophrenia must be due to an abundance of dopamine.

Antidepressants were determined to improve the activity of the neurotransmitter serotonin, consequently, depression must be due to a loss of serotonin. Benzodiazepines enhanced the activity of the neurotransmitter GABA, so anxiety must be owing to the absence of GABA.

These naive and simple hopes turned out to be incorrect. 50 years later we still do not know the cause of schizophrenia or depression or even how the medications work. The prediction of these ailments has altered little.

Furthermore, anxiety is as prevalent as ever. It has grown apparent that the medications do not remedy any mental disorder. They do manage some symptoms but have limited impact on the underlying processes.

And, of course, the drugs carry their own disadvantages. But these same drugs have made billions of dollars for drug companies.

Following the innovative drug developments, there was research in the pharmaceutical manufacturing for unique drugs acting on dopamine, serotonin or GABA. Once the necessary work had been done, drug firms did not have to foot the expense of producing new drugs.

It was much more inexpensive to produce (me too) drugs with comparable effects. As a consequence, our society ended up with over 20 separate but comparable composites in each group of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and sedative/hypnotics. They went where the demand was.

Plus there was a change in the way drug firms were run. At the start, the pharmaceutical trade was controlled by chemists. This was not so bad. Presently most of them are driven by people with MBAs, or things similar to that, people who could be the chief executive of Renault, Volvo or anything. They don’t know about drugs, but apparently, they do know where the business is.

It’s all about marketing and making money, and that is the architecture of how a corporation is run, and this is how our whole society is run as well. It’s a chilly concept, and we would be insane to think otherwise. It’s a solemn business making money off people’s disabilities because we suddenly become a prisoner to those companies who tailor our needs to their own pocket.

Parasites to the point of extortion, and it’s a costly business making money off those that are dying. No wonder citizens of the United Kingdom are discontented.

As Tony Blair faces further allegations over misleading parliament regarding the occupation of Iraq, another new rumour seems fixed to overwhelm him. A whistleblower, identified only as Major X to preserve his integrity, has declared that army employees attired in police uniform to act against organisations deemed fanatical.

Plus he has declared that Blair knew about the army’s operations and even approved them. The journalist at the heart of the turmoil encompassing the former Prime Minister is demanding a public investigation into the accusations.

In the beginning of November, the political weblog site SKWAWKBOX detailed assertions regarding the notorious 1984 Battle of Orgreave. It alleged that, throughout the battle, Margaret Thatcher employed the army against striking mineworkers.

In a meeting with an objective witness, the weblog asserted that the government employed military staff and horses. It further stated that the police and supposed military commenced the battle. Also, it affirmed that many police did not have official numbers on their uniform. Furthermore, that some of those were handling weaponry such as knuckledusters.

The eyewitness’s claims to further back up additional contemporary facts from the battle. But now, SKWAWKBOX has talked to a different whistleblower. On 22 November, the weblog announced that Major X, a previous army officer, had identified Blair in fiery revelations.

The affirmations point that Orgreave may not be the only time the army outfitted up as police. Also, the officer claims that Blair had an extensive understanding of the evil operations.

SKWAWKBOX says that Major X’s allegations:

Shows army employees dressing in police uniform to act not only against organisations that are anything but extreme. However, against the extremely shocking and questionable fanatics possible, with the extensive information of at least two serving Prime Ministers (John Major and Tony Blair).

Major X professes to be a former army officer. He said to SKWAWKBOX it was his responsibility to appoint army corps in support of police operations against any organisation deemed die-hard under both Major and Blair’s governments.

Major X maintains the army systematically assigned the army employees with false police ID and clothes. He further states both Major and Blair knew of the army’s activities and even sanctioned them. However, Major X goes further.

He maintains that armed employees imitated police against many organisations, groups, and people during the 1990s. These supposedly included striking firemen, prison officers, and animal rights activists. Yet most shockingly, Major X insists that even the Royal Family and EU representatives were spied upon by these possible hidden army corps.

He alleges that the purpose of the army against these organisations and people was:

Essentially for scrutiny, but occasionally for infiltration and arrest procedures.

Major X’s entire discussion with SKWAWKBOX shows even more shocking details. Basically, he maintains that the army was employed as Black Ops, to beef up police forces facing anybody considered a threat to the country. However, Blair’s supposed awareness and permission of these bad operations is possibly the most disturbing aspect.

If correct, this results to, at best, yet another effective clampdown by Blair on trade unions and left-wing parties. But at worst, Major X’s atomic declaration implies a blatant misuse of authority by Blair. One which extends the meaning of extremist to satisfy his own, alienating agenda.

However, Major X’s disclosures, when compared with the equivalent actions at Orgreave, further ask the questions, just why has the Conservative government rejected an examination into Orgreave? Furthermore what precisely is it attempting to cover up?

These are accusations necessitate a complete and total public interrogation.

Nobody realises it, but we are we living in a dictatorship, why do we vote these people in and let them control us like this? They simply run feral once they have control and do bidding for someone else since it unquestionably isn’t for our good.

A number of people are saying that Blair is a lawbreaker, megalomaniac, bordering on idiotic and somebody stated someplace that Tony Blair has got more skeletons in the cupboard than Fred West, and that Blair is a dangerous criminal.

The worst implication of this article is the obvious evidence that Parliamentary Leader Party star Tony Blair was as dangerous as the Conservative Party at stifling human rights and freedom of speech.

We want a true leader who fights for the common people, helping with their needs, by the preference of their own, or at least more fairness, one who actually understands that by attending our needs they serve their own.

That is a patriot, not all them unlawful constituents who make believe that wearing poppies whilst you screw the poorest, sick and extremely destitute out of a few quid per week so they can make nice with their billionaire sponsors. Is the best this country can do?

The Conservative Party and Tony Blair have no remorse, and the Mainstream Media encourages them in their excessive misuse of power and administration of the truth.

If Thatcher did it, Major did it and Blair did it then hands up anybody who believes for a millisecond that Cameron and Brown didn’t do it and May won’t.

Benjamin Giroux was assigned an open-ended homework task by his teacher. When challenged to compose a poem, Benjamin chose to utilise it as a chance to show others what it’s like to live with autism. Being autistic, Benjamin has perpetually considered himself different when matched to his peers.

Whilst he wants to be treated equal to everybody else, he realises his Autism makes him come across differently. In a poem titled “I Am,” Benjamin strives to show what his world is like. When his father Sonny read it, he was overwhelmed with emotions.

Once you read his poem, it’s clear to see why. Picture reading lines such as “I feel like a boy in outer space / I touch the stars and feel out of place” or “I say I ‘feel like a castaway’ / I dream of a day that that’s okay.”

As a parent, listening to these words from your child will choke you up. Sonny told that he and his wife were proud of their child for writing such a poem, but they didn’t realise he felt this way. They are so proud, although so sad, that this was how he felt.

The poem has gone viral on the Internet since it was first posted. The National Autism Association highlighted Benjamin’s poem and shared it with all of its supporters. Presently, people all over the world can get a real perception of what it’s like to live with Autism.

This is all thanks to Benjamin and his moving poem.

I am certain there are numerous people out there who would love to feel like they could reach the stars or listen to the sounds in the air, but Benjamin is not alone, there are countless children similar to Benjamin out there, that go through the same challenges every day of their life.

Sadly, these children don’t make friends easily, which makes their life really hard since regular people don’t understand them, and that makes them pretty confused since they sense that nobody likes them, that’s not the problem, the difficulty is, they just do not understand them, but these children are really beautiful, it’s really such a disgrace that nobody is ready to get to know them for who they really are, or even to attempt to understand them.

We are simply ‘normals”, however, to an Autistic child, they see us and think we are weird, of course, we are not weird, but to them in their world, we are weird, and they are normal, to us, they are weird and we are normal, but “what is normal?”

The thing is this, in their world, they are comfortable and secure, but in our world, our world is pretty scary for them. It frustrates them, so we have to take a tiny part of our world and make it secure for them, so they are not so disoriented since people with Autism don’t like change, and our world is infinitely evolving around them, whereas in their world, nothing shifts.

These children do have feelings, hidden feelings that they never show anyone, and they are all unique in their own way.

We are all of us, different in our own way, we are all individual in some way or another, none of us is identical. Nevertheless, conformism in our culture wants us all to be identical, but these children do not fit into that level of conventionality.

Benjamin’s poem is brilliant, his message is stark, but he has hit the nail on its head.

Some people feel guilty about a child with Autism since they don’t believe that they can talk to them, it seems like a whole different level to them, but actually, all they have to do is smile, you don’t have to manage the situation, they will do that for you because all you have to do is adapt to their world, and see them for who they really are.

It’s a touchy subject since there are a lot of people out there that don’t know how to manage the situation and display hostility towards Autistic people, also family members because they just don’t understand but let me acquaint you, these children are not monsters, and to think this is ridiculous.

Being Autistic might make them slightly different, but what a dull world we would live in if we were all the same, and we must open our horizons if we are actually going to communicate with others, whether they be Autistic or not.

A premature newborn was left to die in a sluice room at a declining NHS Trust hospital in Manchester. The newborn, which was born too early to revive, was not cared for the two hours of her brief life and died alone in a place utilised for the distribution of medical garbage.

The upsetting occurrence was reported in a confidential private report into continuing deficits, poor team attitudes and clinical failures in the maternity departments of North Manchester General and Royal Oldham hospitals. A study of maternity services at Pennine Acute Hospital NHS Trust, which runs the two hospitals, was acquired through Freedom of Information inquiries by the Manchester Evening News.

It described a series of preventable deaths and long-term injuries made by failures over numerous years. The article described how one woman perished of a disastrous hemorrhage after her manifestations were put down to mental collapse and another was left with a colostomy because her condition was missed three times.

It further stated the Trust was putting women at unacceptable danger by taking on too many high-risk gestations at North Manchester General owing to the absence of beds at Oldham. The infant was born just ahead of the statutory age of viability, which is about 23 weeks. As by recommendation, workers did not attempt to keep her alive, however, the statement announced basic empathy was missing.

When the baby was born alive and went on to live for about another two hours, the team affiliates associated with the administration did not obtain a calm spot to remain with her to nurse her as she departed. They instead put her in a Moses basket and left her in the sluice room to die alone.

Long-term failures in the departments led to great levels of harm for babies in particular and reiterated warnings over years had not led to changes. The newspaper announced the trust sought to quash the story and even pretended it did not exist.

The article distinguished plain indication of bad decision-making which has resulted in significant injury to women and genuine problems on maternity wards.

This resulted in large levels of abuse for infants in particular, which has a vital life-long impact. The Trust had a huge reliance on locum workers, more than one-third of the specialist employees, and as such was quite vague in its structure and lacked particular abilities and capabilities, which had directed to adverse consequences for the women.

In one case, a newborn died because its mother had a unique blood type which workers declined to recognise. It quoted disturbing repeated problems across the administration, comprising failures to monitor fundamental important symptoms, bad documentation, important lab results that went unchecked, and important lost data left off patient records.

The trust announced that extra help had been taken on and improvement was being made to enhance care. A report outlined a set mindset amongst workers who favoured to see patients conditions as uncomplicated and repeated violation of the patient’s welfare methods and inadequate enforcement monitoring of the large amounts of agency workers on the trust’s books.

The Trust received numerous legal suits and spent out more in losses than any other mid-2010 and 2015, almost half of them correlating to mothers and babies, payouts which calculated at higher than £25 million.

The precedence is for all of the trust’s duties to reach the lofty criteria that patients demand and warrant. Evidently, they are unwaveringly making the needed changes so that patients can get safe, high-quality care across all of their services.

In addition to the placement of a new Head of Midwifery, 31 new midwives started in post across the two maternity units at North Manchester and Oldham last month.

One episode recognises that a newborn died following childbirth as the mother was not identified through her antenatal supervision as being rhesus negative and given the proper treatment to stop any opposing impacts on her baby.

Nevertheless, this is not good enough, no baby should die because of a clerical mistake. Obviously this was not intentionally done, however, this should not have happened in the first place, and the pain that a family has to face when they lose a newborn is so immense, and further preparation should be given to staff, and if there are not enough funds to do so, then the government must find it, and fast before any more deaths happen.

There have been too many cutbacks to the NHS by our government, this is fact. This is a conscious action by our government to cut funds to accumulate wealth, however, when you are bartering with life, there are no cutbacks to conserve funds, we are dealing with human beings, living people, with lifeblood coursing through their veins, you simply can’t put a figure on that.

Human beings are priceless!

According to Benefit assessors, dementia sufferers can now progress. I’m overwhelmed with excitement, I didn’t realise that medical science had advanced that greatly. Is there something that is not being reported, and are we being kept in the dark?

Numerous people living with degenerative infirmities such as dementia, Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis (MS) are losing part or all of their disability benefits after being reassessed. Wendy Mitchell, who has early onset dementia, told that her benefits have been terminated following a reassessment, despite her knowledge that her health has got worse.

It took her independence away completely, it was terrible, by this, we immediately know that the system is completely broken. How can they tell this sick woman that she is better than she was? Hundreds and thousands live with an incurable illness, a sickness that can only get worse. Many depend on the state to fund the additional expenses of getting about, however, that help is being taken away.

It’s like having an especially bad dose of the flu, and you can’t walk like you usually do. Some days are better than others, some days people are much more mobile. Eight years ago Diane Barrett was diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease. Diane has trouble walking, but when she’s on the proper medicine she can drive small distances.

Diane did remark to her children that she was concerned as she had learned from people who had lost their mobility part of their allowance and lost their car, and all her relatives said, that wouldn’t happen to Diane because she’s got a debilitating illness that’s not going to get any better, it’s only going to get more serious.

But she was completely gobsmacked when the letter came. For 7 years Diane got disability living allowance, however, DLA is gradually being phased out, and being succeeded by Personal Independence Payments (PIP). The idea is to base the amount you get, not just on the disability but how it affects your daily life.

The change indicates that everyone has to be assessed. Diane was told her needs had changed and the amount that she received for getting about fell from £57.45 to 0. Without the Mobility Allowance Diane can’t have a car and she doesn’t have any additional money.

It completely affected her life, it has taken her independence away entirely. Without a car, she would find it extremely difficult to get about. There is a bus, but she finds it really hard to get on and off the bus, and they don’t wait for her to sit down, and she has fallen on them before she had the car.

She was really afraid, and it made her realise how serious her Parkinson’s was, and plus it’s very depressing, and with Parkinson’s you can get a little low sometimes. Therefore, Diane had to give up her old car, but she asked for the ruling to be reviewed and lost the second time. Six months later, she took it to a full appeal in front of the judge, the tribunal took just ten minutes to conclude the government was wrong.

Diane was so relieved because at last somebody was hearing her and accepting that she was speaking the truth.

The government would state that they are paying out much more as a nation on things like disability benefits, and that they have to run these checks and that they have to do this to people to make certain the right people get it.

Diane accepts that, but she believes straight away they see a piece of paper and it states somebody has Parkinson’s disease, Dementia, MS, any continuous things, that person is not going to get over it, they are just not going to get better.

To pass for a car under the government’s mobility scheme you have to get the highest rate of PIP, which gives you further other benefits, a disabled badge, and free road tax, but faced with that increasing bill for disability payments, the government has been toughening the rules, and say the evaluation method is more difficult.

This explains how this is affecting people with serious conditions. Under the former DLA system 82% of people with Parkinson’s disease received full payment, but under PIP that amount has fallen to 40%. It’s the identical fundamental design with other conditions like MS at 93% and arthritis at 83%, MS reduced to 50% and arthritis to 24% with PIP.

The government states that in general, more people get the highest degree of assistance under PIP than under DLA. Plus more people with MS, Osteoarthritis and Parkinson’s are getting the highest possible rate for daily living expenses.

That wouldn’t cover the mobility allowance, people who lose a car can get additional assistance to purchase their old vehicle outright, though that is paid for by a non-profit making organisation, rather than the government.

At Parkinson’s UK, they have set up a devoted organisation to deal with benefit cases. The foundation states that people with a degenerative illness, already on the highest level of support should not have their needs continually reassessed.

The experience of going for an assessment is very demanding, and people with Parkinson’s go to the trouble to look well and take their medicine and get up early in the morning to get to the assessment, and because they seem well on that day the assessor frequently says well you don’t look sick, you don’t require that support any longer.

The newest figures reveal the numbers appealing a ruling are expanding. There are presently more than 6,043 per month, and the vast proportion of 65% is overthrown by the judge. It’s shocking that 2 in every 3 PIP decisions appealed is successful, and its excellent that those decisions are then reversed and those people are getting the levels of assistance that they require, but we shouldn’t be in a situation where people have to depend on the appeals process to get that assistance in the first place, people should be able to expect that the first decision that they get will be the right one.

The government states that PIP assessments are carried out by qualified health professionals and that judgments are made following reflection of all the data provided, comprising supporting data from their GP.

Wendy Mitchell has dementia. And she began to forget the most ridiculous of words, and that’s when it hit her that something wasn’t quite right. Her life has changed, solely from the point that she had to leave work. Previously she could chat about anything and everything, but now she has loads of notes.

Wendy never got DLA, she was one of the first to be moved directly onto PIP following her diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, under the current policy she still has to be reassessed every 18 months. When her latest decision came through she was told her requirements had changed, and her entire benefits would be slashed from £77 a week to nothing.

She just uses it to live, it allows her to live independently, that’s the entire goal of the benefit itself. It permits her to remain and to live in her own home.

Reliable statistics reveal that overall under PIP, numerous people with dementia, seem to be getting the higher rate of payments. The experts state that’s not the whole story, and the Alzheimer’s society maintains its gotten at least 250 calls from people having difficulties with the benefit covering the last 18 months.

Wendy doesn’t remember the content of the meeting, however, she remembers feeling that she wasn’t there very long and the person didn’t ask her many questions to encourage her to remember what she was supposed to be saying, and she didn’t believe that the person had any recognition of her health problems, and she thought that the person lacked any understanding of dementia whatsoever.

Furthermore, she then got the shocking letter that informed her that she was no longer going to get any payment whatsoever. Plus a list of all of the stuff that she was supposedly better at, that she was 18 months before. It’s absurd since she wishes that she was better, who wouldn’t when they have dementia.

It made her feel so demoralised. She immediately recognised that the system is broken since how can they tell her that she’s become better when obviously she will simply get worse, there is no cure for dementia, and there are specific situations when dealing with people who have dementia, MS and additional illnesses comparable to this, that are not reversible, and their infirmity will never get better.

You can’t just make them healthier with a snap of the finger, but their pain can be reduced a tiny bit if they are given the money that enables them to maybe live independently.

It’s a story we learn about in the papers every day, but these people haven’t hit the jackpot when given this money from PIP, it’s an indispensable component of their everyday life. People don’t simply wake one morning and pronounce, that they’ll be ill merely for the pleasure of it so they can get money and state they are sick.

PIP can spread faeces on the sick and disabled, they can present them as shirkers, but the critics know that is not actually the case.

Look about you when your out buying clothes, in a restaurant, or even simply out on the street passing people by. Observe and see, view with your soul, and you will see that almost every other person is impaired in one way or another.

See the person next to you, he/she has glasses, that is an impairment, or the person waiting at the bus stop with the hearing aid. Even your neighbour next door who is a Diabetic, or suffers from Epilepsy, we might not see these ailments, but they are there, right in front of our eyes, and simply because we do not see them, does not indicate they do not exist, and they are quite real.

My mum used to say to me that nobody else can feel somebody else’s pain, and that is very accurate. Just because you can’t see it or feel it, does not imply it’s not there, just because a person seems in good health, doesn’t indicate that they are. It’s called an invisible illness because that’s precisely what it is, invisible because it’s not visible on the outside, it’s on the inside destroying that person like a deadly growth.

Therefore, I urge people who work for PIP, when you next sit next to somebody on the bus or in a queue, take a careful look at that person, they might look well and in excellent health, but you have no concept of what’s going on within their body, and how it might affect their daily life.

As human beings, none of us are perfect, and the government should regard this message that one day it could be them that are in a comparable position as these sick disabled people that they are taking money away from, and if a hospital or doctor has confirmed that they are ill, and their situation will never get better, then that should be sufficient, full stop!