Trump Declares Victory In The Greatest Political Comeback In History

Early Wednesday morning, former President Donald Trump ascended the stage to announce his triumph, completing an incredible political comeback.

Minutes before, news outlets predicted he would win the 2024 presidential election. It was a disastrous evening for Kamala Harris and an incredible night for Republicans.

‘We made history for a reason tonight, and the reason is that we overcame obstacles that nobody thought possible,’ he said. ‘And it is now clear that we’ve achieved the most incredible political thing.’

Fox News’ announcement that Pennsylvania was the largest battleground prize, followed by Wisconsin and eventually the entire election in his favour, was the turning point.

Trump declared victory onstage with his wife Melania, son Barron, age 18, and his most devoted employees and fans, even though the Associated Press had not yet declared the election for him by three in the morning.

‘It’s real,’ screamed one young supporter who raced to the front of the crowd as if it were a mosh pit, high-fiving friends and strangers.

Trump was joined on stage by family—including daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner, who had been absent from the campaign—aides and political supporters.

He thanked his supporters and promised a golden age for the nation.

When he invited his running mate to the microphone, Sen. J.D. Vance said the result marked a remarkable turnaround in political fortunes.

‘I thank you for the trust that you placed in me,’ he said, ‘and I think that we just witnessed the greatest political comeback in the history of the United States of America.’

Trump was a defeated man four years ago. After his supporters looted the U.S. Capitol, he was no longer in the public eye within months.

Allies deserted him, and he headed for exile at Mar-a-Lago.

On Tuesday night, he was surrounded by supporters, friends, and family at his Florida home as he regained his crown.

He led them out on stage at the Palm Beach County Convention Centre, where he delivered his victory speech in front of hundreds more supporters who had waited hours to see him. 

‘Most of all, I want to thank the millions of hard-working Americans across the nation who have always been the heart and soul of this really great movement,’ he said.

‘We’ve been through so much together, and today, you showed up in record numbers to deliver a victory like really … probably … like no other. This was something special.’

The first big call was broadcast in the hall at 11:25 when North Carolina went to Trump.

We must keep in mind that Donald Trump almost sparked a civil war, even though this will be a major victory for him. Now a criminal whack job will be in charge of your country. Excellent work. But for some—well, Jesus Almighty—I guess this will be the finest Christmas ever!

DO IT OR DON’T DO IT! That Is The Question!

Recently, a picture has been making the rounds online, particularly on Facebook.

This is apparently a staff member at Whipps Cross Hospital wearing a Palestine football shirt. That’s not the problem but I guarantee that not one NHS staff throughout the UK would be allowed to wear an Israeli football shirt with Israel on it.

The tax-paying public pays this lady’s salary, and many of those people are Jewish—not the best statement.

The English tax code stipulates that you can refuse to pay taxes if your money is being used to fund war, and we, the British people, oppose genocide.

We have demonstrations every week. Do you want to be paying your taxes for a war that kills innocent people?

There are not enough words to express how horrible this is.

Apparently, the manager is a Pakistani woman. If you think she should be fired, please share your opinions.

Why do our nation’s authorities condone such behaviour?

Go ahead and wear anything like this casually, but don’t expect your employer to publicly support one side over another in divisive international issues.

If this is your attitude, and it shows on the day, with you attempting to impress your views on others, then yes, expect to rightfully get a request for a ‘chat’ from HR.

It’s the NHS, not Amnesty International for crying out loud!

Nothing useful can be obtained by doing this. For a very tiny audience, it’s just a publicity gimmick that won’t have any good effects.

Introducing controversial politics to the workplace is likely going to get HR involved. There is nothing to prohibit you from wearing a football shirt, depending on your work dress code/handbook policy on what can be seen as a political symbol. I think everyone’s heads need a little jiggle here to get their brain cells working, and ultimately this could impact your career prospects, where you could be pegged as a troublemaker.

Wearing a Palestinian tee shirt might present as a political statement, but it’s certainly not illegal, and it’s not something that you should be wearing in a hospital.

Teenage Boy Repeatedly Stabs 13-Year-Old Girl

Following the horrific stabbing of a 13-year-old girl in Yorkshire on Friday morning, a teenage male has been charged with attempted murder.

The young girl, who was found by passersby, had suffered serious lacerations, including stab wounds to her neck, back, chest, and abdomen. 

The teenager was charged with attempted murder in addition to possessing a bladed object.

The 14-year-old boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has been remanded into custody to appear at Hull Magistrates’ Court on Monday.

When passing motorists spotted the wounded teenager by the side of the A63 outside of Hessle, Yorkshire, early on Friday morning, Humberside Police were rushed to the scene.

Behind the Humber View Hotel, in a wooded area that borders a sizable meadow, the event took place.

The hotel had previously been taken over by the Home Office to house young male asylum seekers. But reopened to the public over the summer and appeared largely deserted.

Emergency services attended the scene, discovering the girl, 13 years old, had sustained multiple life-threatening lacerations.

She was subsequently taken to the hospital to receive medical treatment, where she now remains in a serious but stable condition.

An area search was conducted and six teenagers were arrested on suspicion of attempted murder in a wooded area nearby in connection with the incident.

Allegedly, the six teenagers were discovered clustered around the remnants of a fire with empty beer cans surrounding them.

Three teenage boys, aged 15, 16, and 17 years old, and two girls, aged 14 and 15 years old, have since been released from custody on police bail.

The incident on the outskirts of North Ferriby, a quiet community with a view of the Humber Bridge, has surprised the locals.

One woman whose home adjoins the meadow, but on the other side of the field to the woods where the girl was attacked, said, ‘We just saw the police there and that.

‘My husband was in the garden and just happened to see the police there and these two tents. It is terrible.

‘You cannot believe it. It is a really quiet area. It is only a small village.’

Another woman, who was walking her dog in the field but did not want to be named, said, ‘That area is quite popular.

‘You always see a lot of mess in there. It is also really bad-lit. In the school holidays, there is always kids in there.

‘It is not very nice. We come here every single day. We have no idea what has happened. The area is referred to as Little Switzerland.

Service Personnel In The RAF And Navy Are Outnumbered By Ministry Of Defence ‘Pen-Pushers’

There are currently more bureaucrats employed by the Ministry of Defence than there are service members in the Royal Navy and RAF put together.

The total of MoD civil servants jumped by 6 percent to 63,702 between 2020 and April this year.

The ranks of full-time trained service fighters, including the Army, fell to 72,510 in that period.

But there are 28,840 trained members of the Royal Navy and Royal Marines plus 28,420 in the RAF. That means the combined total of 57,260 is less than the number of civil servants working in the Whitehall department.

This equates to the smallest number of service personnel since the Napoleonic era more than 200 years ago and is forecast to plummet to below 70,000 next year.

The figures come despite the previous Conservative government having planned to slash MoD civil servant numbers by 3,000 to save cash.

Lord Lee of Trafford, a defence minister in the 1980s and the Liberal Democrat peer who uncovered the figures, told The Times: ‘We have ended up in a situation where there are 63,000 civil servants employed when the Army itself is only 72,000 strong. 

‘I can’t think of a large private sector firm that hasn’t, through efficiencies and modern telecommunication, reduced their headcount, and yet in the MoD, it has actually increased. The whole thing is extraordinarily lopsided and surely it’s time to take a really hard look at these figures.’

Lord Lee supported a reduction in civil servant numbers, saying this would free up more money to spend on ‘the sharper end in terms of equipment and accommodation for the forces, which is in a pretty deplorable state’.

The overall civil servant tally increased from 384,230 in 2016 to 510,665 in March this year.

It comes amid calls for the new Labour Government to hike defence spending to at least 2.5 percent of GDP after it ditched the target, which the Tories had pledged to hit by 2030.

Last week Defence Secretary John Healey admitted that the Armed Forces are not ready to fight a war.

He said: ‘The UK, in keeping with many other nations, has essentially become very skilled and ready to conduct military operations. What we’ve not been ready to do is to fight. And unless we are ready to fight, we are not in a shape to deter.’

The problem is that the MoD will recruit more personnel to make spending decisions as soon as we give them additional funding.

The bigger the department, the more pay, perks, and status they get because there is no reward for downsizing, and it’s the same with the NHS! And it will be no shock when eventually managers and administrators will outnumber doctors and nurses if they don’t already.

How on earth has this been allowed to happen? The various departments within the civil service have grown beyond what the country wants or requires. Our taxes are funding this waste.

It’s time for a change. Government agencies must be cut and red tape must be eliminated. The working class, who pay for these and other luxuries, must have more influence over how their contributions are used. Our government must also shift its perspective and acknowledge that the current disparity cannot continue.

Water Is Frantically Lapped At By Rescued Dogs

After her dogs were compelled to live in abhorrent conditions until they were fortunately saved, a lady was hauled before the courts.

In a heartbreaking video released by South Yorkshire Police, the poor animals can be seen frantically lapping at water from a tap in a filthy bathroom.  

Shelby Russell, 29 from Sheffield, has been banned from owning pets for 10 years after she left her cats and dogs to starve to death.

The RSPCA found Russell’s dogs living in filthy circumstances with their own excrement all around them. Additionally, Russell had neglected them for more than a week, causing them to become malnourished and dehydrated.

On October 14 of last year, an RSPCA inspector visited the house and saw the animals by themselves.

They placed seals on Russell’s door to see if anyone gained access to the property before the inspector returned two days later.

The inspector summoned South Yorkshire Police to assist in rescuing the creatures because no one had entered the premises.

Russell made a number of justifications for why her dogs had been left in such a state when she returned to the house before the police arrived.

The excuses included that she had ‘been in hospital’, ‘had paid a dog sitter who failed to care for the animals’, ‘left the tap running 24/7 for the animals’ and ‘fed them three times a day’.

As the RSPCA began to catch and seize the animals, Russell became aggressive and threatening, pushing an inspector and stating she ‘would stab anyone who tries to take her babies’.

She was detained and placed under arrest when police arrived at the property.

The court heard how footage and photographs obtained for evidence showed the dogs scrambling to get to water once it was given and that they continued to drink continuously for minutes.

After the animals were seized, a veterinarian provided a professional assessment of the animal’s condition and the reasons they were so underweight.

No findings indicated that the animals’ health problems prevented them from eating, and their ailments had improved following their seizure.

Dog Legislation Sergeant Matt Duffy said, ‘Animals deserve to be cared for and loved.

‘Leaving them defenceless, locked in cages to starve and dehydrate is disgusting behaviour.

‘I am pleased today that Russell has been banned from owning any animals for 10 years for the pain and suffering she inflicted on these poor animals.

‘We will not tolerate animal cruelty within South Yorkshire and will work with our partners to ensure those responsible are put before the courts.

‘Thankfully this investigation had a happy ending, and the animals were making good progress with their care within the RSPCA.

‘If you have concerns about an animal in your community, report it.’

Russell appeared before Sheffield Magistrates’ Court and was sentenced to a 10-year ban from owning animals, ordered to undertake 20 days of rehabilitation and pay fines totalling £199.

When will courts utilise the Welfare Act to properly punish these individuals? She should have received a life ban and a non-custodial sentence.

The legislation on animal cruelty is insufficient, and those who mistreat animals should have their permission to own an animal withdrawn as soon as they are found guilty.

However, the RSPCA believed that the dogs were abandoned. You could clearly see that they had been, but they sealed the doors and still waited two more days and put these dogs through misery.

She should have been given a prison sentence, but all the prisons are full to the brim at the moment, so there is no room at the inn. However, this woman is a cruel excuse for a human being and she should have had a lifetime ban because she is an awful person with no regard for anything that breathes. I sincerely hope this woman doesn’t have any children of her own.

Iowa Resident Dies From Ebola-Like Virus

A terrifying viral illness that causes ocular haemorrhage, akin to Ebola, has claimed the life of an Iowa person.

According to health officials, the patient brought Lassa fever, an uncommon illness in the United States, back to the country from West Africa earlier this month.

The person was not sick while travelling, meaning the risk to fellow airline passengers is ‘extremely low,’ officials with the U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention said.

Patients are not thought to be contagious before symptoms appear, and casual contact does not spread the virus.

The University of Iowa Health Care Medical Centre in Iowa City isolated the patient, who has not been publicly identified.

Testing conducted by the Nebraska Laboratory Response Network on Monday showed that Lassa fever was the cause of the patient’s death.

The Iowa case, if verified, would be the ninth recorded instance of Lassa fever in visitors returning to the United States from regions where the illness has been prevalent since 1969.

The CDC is now assisting Iowa health officials to identify people who had been in contact with the patient after symptoms began. Those identified as being in close contact will be monitored for three weeks.

Lassa fever, which is caused by the Lassa virus, is a relatively common disease in West Africa, with between 100,000 and 300,000 cases diagnosed every year with around 5,000 deaths.

Symptoms are typically mild and include fever, fatigue, and headache, but some people may develop vomiting, difficulty breathing, facial swelling, and pain in the back, chest, or stomach.

The patient’s infection source is being investigated by state and local health officials.

It’s believed they had been in contact with rodents in West Africa. 

Rodents carry the virus, which people can get by coming into contact with the urine or faeces of infected animals.

In rare cases, it can be transmitted among people through direct contact with a sick person’s blood or bodily fluids, through mucous membranes, or through sexual contact.

Lassa fever was named after a Nigerian town where Western-trained doctors first noted it in 1969. 

Scientists first identified the virus causing Lassa fever in 1969. It belongs to the Arenaviridae family.

According to the World Health Organisation, 80 per cent of people who get infected won’t develop any symptoms. But the virus has a case fatality rate of around 1 percent.

According to the WHO, Lassa fever is endemic in Nigeria and several other west coast African nations, such as Guinea and Liberia.

Someone travelled from West Africa to the United States and brought it in. How wonderful, not! Nor did they specify who brought it in, but clearly they were unchecked for any diseases before they came in, and it’s very scary that American citizens are forced to be exposed to dozens of new diseases because of uncontrolled, unchecked open border policies.

It seems that not one person is cleared, checked, or vetted.

Thanks to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the United States will now endure years of illness and misery as a result of new migrants and those who are already in the country flying back and forth to their home countries.

“Baaa blind sheep, have you any wool? Yes, sir, yes sir and I’m 6 jabs full. One for humanity, one for that day and four because I’ll always do whatever they say.”

Unfortunately, checking someone who doesn’t exhibit any symptoms is rather challenging. Lassa fever takes one to three weeks to incubate, and its initial symptoms—such as fever, headaches, muscular soreness, and an overall feeling of unwellness—often mimic those of the flu.

Roughly 80 percent of cases are mild and go unrecognised, but the disease can be severe and even fatal in about 1 percent of those infected.

Russian ‘Floating Bomb’ Ship

A Russian cargo ship dubbed the ‘floating bomb’ is due to dock up at a UK port after reportedly being refused entry by other countries.

Peel Ports Group told shipping magazine GCaptain that the ship, known as the Ruby, will arrive at the port of Great Yarmouth in Norfolk on October 28. It is carrying seven times as many explosives as the one that destroyed Beirut in 2020.

Marine Traffic, a worldwide ship tracking service, reports that the Ruby was anchored off Margate, Kent, earlier this month. However, the ship has now relocated to Norfolk, farther north.

After having to leave the Norwegian port of Tromso on September 4 owing to cargo issues, only three days after docking there to take refuge from a storm, it was first sighted around Kent at the end of September.

Before sailing to Las Palmas in the Canary Islands, the cargo ship flying the flag of Malta was loaded with explosives from a port in Kandalaksha, northern Russia, on August 22.

It is understood that the Ruby is loaded with 20,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate, which is seven times more than the 2,750 tonnes that exploded in the Port of Beirut in Lebanon, killing 218 people in 2020.

However, after meeting with Shipping Minister Mike Kane earlier this month, Sir Roger Gale, MP for Herne Bay and Sandwich, declared that the shipment was secure.

‘I am advised that the cargo, originally destined for Africa, of class 2 ammonium nitrate is safe,’ he wrote on X.

‘Due to damage to the ship, which has not rendered the vessel unseaworthy but requires repair [and] negotiations are ongoing to unload the cargo.’

He also added: ‘[I] am led to believe that the legal situation is that because the ship itself is neither Russian owned nor flagged, no international law has been broken or sanctions breached.’ 

The Ruby’s rudder, hull, and propeller were damaged, but after a few days, officials demanded the ship go as villagers’ concerns increased, according to Newsweek.

The ship was anchored close to hundreds of residences, a hospital, and a university campus, which alarmed the locals.

According to Newsweek, authorities did not outright say the ship would erupt; however, they did say it was ‘not desirable’ for the vessel to be so close to the Norwegian city.

Marine Traffic claims that the Ruby departed Norway and headed northward, passing close to the municipality of Andoy.

The decision was made to pump 37.5 million kroner into the Andoya Air Station, which was constructed in 1951, following a NATO meeting. 

The funds were intended for the defence of the air base, which would eventually be used to monitor the oceans with long-range drones.

In May, the Norwegian Defence Minister Bjorn Arild Gram said: ‘Andoya plays an important role in national security, allied defence and technological development.

‘The growing military-strategic significance of the base for Norway and NATO requires that we continue manned guarding.’

The UK door seems to be open to everyone and everything at all times, and to be honest I don’t trust any official who tells us we are safe, and whoever sanctioned this will have to face the consequences if anything goes wrong, and why does the UK have to be a dumping ground for other countries?

Money my friend – money!

Could this be Prince William’s olive branch to Harry?

Prince William has taken a conciliatory step in his feud with Prince Harry by publicly naming him for what is believed to be the first time in six years.

In a recent documentary, William describes how, as youngsters, Princess Diana brought the boys to a homeless shelter in London to expose them to the reality of life outside the palace.

The film, titled ‘Prince William: We Can End Homelessness’, includes poignant unseen photos of William and Diana at the Passage in Westminster.

One shows the young Prince intently playing chess with a homeless guy at the shelter during Princess Diana’s visit with William on June 14, 1993, a few days before his eleventh birthday.

Another, taken in December that year shows a suited-and-booted young William standing alongside his mother at the shelter, his arms stuffed with presents to give.

‘My mother took me to the Passage; she took Harry and I both there… I’d never been to anything like that before and I was a bit anxious as to what to expect,’ explains William.

‘My mother went about her usual part of making everyone feel relaxed and having a joke with everyone…I remember having some good conversations, playing chess, and chatting.

‘You meet people, like I did then, who put a different perspective in your head.’

The touching introduction demonstrates how the Prince’s recollections of his mother fuelled his desire to eradicate homelessness.

The Prince of Wales is tragically familiar with trauma and family dissolution, which are highlighted in the movie as typical reasons for homelessness.

In addition to his mother’s passing, William and his younger brother are still at odds, and this should not be the case. They are brothers, whether royal or not! It shouldn’t matter what background you come from; blood is thicker than water!

Until this film, it was understood William had not uttered his brother’s name in a public speech or interview since 2018 when the two princes, alongside the Princess of Wales and Meghan Markle, were interviewed at the Royal Foundation Forum.

If only through an old photograph of the two boys visiting the shelter in 1993, the documentary also brings the brothers back together on film.

His wife, the Princess of Wales, was diagnosed with cancer, which was another personal catastrophe that occurred during the filming.

It’s more of a tribute to their mother’s work and his desire to carry on her legacy than an olive branch, although it would be good if it was a positive step. They are brothers, after all.

Reintroducing them both into each other’s lives would be wonderful. They should shake hands and put the past behind them as brothers, even if Harry might never be trusted again. At the end of the day, family is family regardless of what they have done.

Diana would not have wanted this and Prince William knows this. Even if they had a shallow, polite relationship, it would be something, and Diana would have been so disappointed in them both.

Normal individuals don’t permanently cut out their siblings from their lives because they disagree, and as Christians, they should just forgive those who have harmed them. In this case, it was Harry, but I’m sure he had his reasons, and I’m also definitely sure he knows more about his mother’s death than he’s letting on.

Some might say that it wasn’t a disagreement and that it was a complete betrayal. Either way, it has nothing to do with us. It is a family matter that we the public have no jurisdiction in, unless, of course, your surname is Windsor and you are related to them, and even then, they are brothers who should be working it out between themselves, and even their wives should mind their beeswax!

Wi-Fi and Bathrooms Are The Only Reasons Gen Z Soldiers Will Join The Army

Your Army needs you! Unless you’re Gen Z, you need better Wi-Fi and bathroom ensuites.

According to research on Armed Forces accommodation, these were some of the top demands of young soldiers. The top four requirements for Gen Z troops, who are described as those under 27, also included having a double bed and a suitable kitchen in which to prepare their meals.

According to a Ministry of Defence poll, young, unmarried service personnel currently anticipate receiving 19 benefits while in the military. In more recent barracks, troops often have their own rooms, and the most advanced have private bathrooms.

However, many troops on older sites share restrooms, showers, and common areas; in fact, up to six soldiers may share a single space.

According to the survey, inadequate accommodation and the poor quality of food offered in canteens are the main reasons why thousands of soldiers leave the Armed Forces each year.

Up to 40% of soldiers stated that their choice to choose other jobs was largely influenced by worries about housing and food. According to the poll, more than 6,000 of the 15,710 soldiers who left the Armed Forces last year complained about their meals and accommodations.

It also showed that a third of all soldiers believe they pay too much for their accommodation, with more than 20,000 military personnel making formal complaints about accommodation in the last two years, according to MoD figures. 

According to a different assessment released earlier this year, service housing was beset by recurring issues such as mildew, dampness, electrical and gas malfunctions, and insect infestations.

Colonel Phil Ingram, a former Army intelligence officer, said: ‘Too many facilities are shared, where heating often doesn’t work and where roofs leak. There are often problems with vermin and, worst of all, there is little privacy.

‘I am not surprised so many cite accommodation as a reason for leaving, as on the whole, it is generally atrocious.’ 

An MoD spokesman said it is ‘determined to tackle the dire state of service accommodation’ and will appoint an Armed Forces Commissioner ‘to act as a strong, independent champion for personnel and their families to improve service life’.

Cooks on the base used to prepare and serve the food, and it was delicious. However, since it was outsourced to civilian caterers, the quality of the cuisine has declined. Why? Because the goal of civilian caterers’ businesses is profit, not providing the greatest service.

Schools and NHS staff canteens are no different. Instead of having in-house chefs prepare far superior cuisine, they hire catering services to deliver unappetising, subpar food that is then reheated.

Why shouldn’t our forces get decent accommodation and good food? Not only that, but they should get it for free because they’re fighting for their King and country. Let’s face it, if you’re an asylum seeker, our government hands out food and accommodation, but they treat their forces like they’re lepers, disgusting!

Barracks should be neat, orderly, and mould-free, but they can’t expect fine food or bubble baths when they’re on the field and fighting.

We need to provide our troops with far better facilities than they have now.

Nursery Ordered To Remove Privacy Fence

After a ‘ridiculous’ council ordered a nursery to demolish a 6-foot fence that was put in place to protect kids while they were playing outside, parents expressed their outrage.

Westcliff-on-Sea’s Imperial Day Nursery has filed an appeal against Southend Council after the council ordered that a massive fence that rises above the business be removed or its height reduced.

Situated on a residential road in the seaside suburb, neighbours say the fencing, which is 6 feet high, looks ‘terrible and unsightly’.

But parents of children attending the nursery accuse the council of prioritising the ‘aesthetics of the street’ over the safety of their children as they campaign for the fence to stay up.

The nursery first became engulfed in a planning row with the council in 2022 after a complaint was made regarding the structure, which was built without proper planning permissions in place.

Imperial Day Nursery then lodged a retrospective planning application, but the council rejected it, claiming it was ‘visually prominent and stark’ and ‘out of keeping’ with the surrounding area.

The nursery has since intensified its defence by contesting the enforcement action taken by the council.

Speaking to MailOnline outside the nursery, parents told of how they feel safer with the structure being in place.

They say that before its use, strangers could easily peer into the ‘baby room’ at the front of the building, and that the fence also allows children to safely play in the outdoor area in front of the property.

One mother, Natalie Toby, said, ‘I’m a security advisor so from my point of view, it keeps children hidden away from the public walking past.

‘You can’t really see where the front door is unless you go all the way down there, so they’re keeping access routes nice and tucked away.

‘The nursery has been here for 30 years so I don’t see why the council are applying the same rules that they would to domestic dwellings.

‘New-build schools are being built with fence lines not dissimilar to this, so why are they not allowing this?

‘Surely the safety of the children is more important than the aesthetics.’

She told of an incident before the fencing that blocks the window of the front room was erected when a postman unintendedly dropped heavy parcels through the window of the baby room.

She added, ‘So it’s not just about keeping it closed off from people with malicious intentions; it’s accidental things as well.

‘They’ve got vulnerable children in that front room, and having the fence up keeps the babies safe.

‘It’s ridiculous; I don’t understand why the council are being so stubborn about it.

‘Surely safeguarding children and their safety is paramount to aesthetics.

‘I don’t want my daughter in a room where people can just walk past and look through.’

This is a story with two sides. Residents believe the fence is an eyesore and may be depreciating their property, while parents believe it keeps their kids safe.

If Southend council want the fence down, why don’t they find the group a suitable centre where they could be safe and in no one else’s eyesight?

However, all of this makes me feel negatively about the world we live in. What comes next? Will we all be forced to live in bunkers?

Although it’s pleasant to see kids play, not everyone is watching with good intentions, and I would want every safety measure in place if it were my grandkids. However, saying that it’s not normal to keep children away from everyone’s sight. It’s not mentally healthy to have such a fear-driven mindset, and it’s not healthy for kids either.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started