How Much Do Young People Know About D-Day?

Alongside the Battle of Britain and Dunkirk, D-Day holds a shrine in British history as a moment when the country’s heroism came head-to-head with the Nazi regime.

The courage and sacrifice of our Second World War servicemen are rightfully at the forefront of our public awareness as we commemorate the landings’ 80th anniversary.

Politicians have taken a step back from campaigning, the royal family was out in force to pay tribute at remembrance events and Britons up and down the UK were recalling the fateful day.

On the anniversary of the Normandy landings, MailOnline surveyed Generation Z to find out how much they knew about the Allied invasion of France.

Some admitted they ‘didn’t really listen’ as their grandparents tried to tell them about their history and others said they had ‘no idea’ what the moniker meant. One even believed it stood for Doomsday.

While one Brighton resident stated that she believed the iconic conflict had taken place in London, another Birmingham girl laughed embarrassingly as she estimated that it happened in 1970.

However, some made their nation proud by delving into forensic detail and providing answers to a series of questions meant to push the boundaries of their awareness.

Speaking in Birmingham, Ash Robinson, 21, said he thought D-Day was ‘the bombing of Britain’, although he admitted he didn’t ‘know exactly where in Britain’ this had happened. 

When pressed, he later added that he thought it had taken place in ‘Birmingham… I think it might have been some in London, but mostly Birmingham, I think.’

Some young people were able to name every coded beach in France where Allied forces had landed, while others named London as the location they thought they had landed.

Emily Painting, 25, who works for the Civil Service, added: ‘I actually don’t know. I have no clue.’ When asked when it had taken place, she continued: ‘I don’t know… 1970?’

Student Luke Marsden, 19, continued: ‘My great gran tried to tell me so much about it and I didn’t really listen! Maybe the day that there was some landings somewhere?’

And Mia Allen, 21, said: ‘No, I don’t know anything about it.’

But the historic event appeared to have been overshadowed for some. Ibrahim Abdullah, 24, told a reporter, ‘Doomsday is a day when the world ends, ok, so what do we define as the world ending?

Sadly, in Britain, individuals under forty have a terrible lack of knowledge of even recent history, and they don’t teach history in schools like they used to.

This country’s history has been slowly eroding, and it’s been replaced by woke, shame, and guilt. Our youth have been indoctrinated by adults and oikophobia thrives.

You start to question why our predecessors ever battled to protect future generations when you take a stroll around any of our towns and cities.

In British schools, teaching about D-Day and related events is essential for developing national pride, historical awareness, and an appreciation of the sacrifices made for freedom and democracy. Additionally, it encourages moral introspection and critical thinking while assisting pupils in understanding the difficulties and human costs of conflict.

But since Britain is unlike any other country, this is not a method to dramatise our nation. We must keep in mind that over the ages, it has invaded places it could and seized what it desired.

If we don’t educate our children in school, they won’t be able to form educated opinions as adults.

It’s been almost 80 years since World War II and in that time, the UK has seen peace but unfortunately, with that comes complacency.

Drowned In A Sea Of Milkshake!

The model, who was arrested for throwing a drink over Nigel Farage, is using the exposure to encourage people to visit her OnlyFans page.

Victoria Thomas-Bowen, 25, was arrested by police on suspicion of assault after she drenched the new Reform leader as he stepped out of a Wetherspoons in Clacton, Essex.

She has since used the stunt to try and bring viewers to her ‘explicit XXX’ content page, posting a photo of herself scantily clad alongside the link and the lyrics, ‘My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard’.

Dramatic pictures show how the mother-of-one dodged Mr Farage’s burly minders before flinging the contents of a McDonald’s cup towards him, catching him full in the face.

Mr Farage, who previously dubbed Clacton the ‘most patriotic’ town in Britain, merely wiped his eyes and continued.

Thomas-Bowen is a Jeremy Corbyn-supporting OnlyFans model who hails from a family of Brexiteers, MailOnline previously revealed. 

Speaking from his home in nearby Jaywick, her Brexit-voting brother Paul told MailOnline: ‘I have just seen it, and to be honest, I’m appalled. I don’t know where she is. I don’t want anything to do with her.’

Despite posting a video on X with the caption ‘my milkshake brings all the people to the rally’ in reference to the 2003 song Milkshake, Farage admitted it was ‘quite frightening’. 

The incident has led to wide condemnation from MPs all across the political spectrum, including Labour’s Yvette Cooper, who called it a ‘disgrace’ and ‘completely unacceptable and wrong’.

But Thomas-Bowen, who films her x-rated video clips in the spare bedroom of her mother’s £260,000 house in Grays, told the BBC she flung the banana milkshake because she ‘just felt like it’.

‘He doesn’t stand for me’, the self-described ‘petite blonde pocket rocket’ added. ‘He doesn’t represent anything I believe in or any of the people around here. He doesn’t represent us; he’s not from here.’

She has since posted support for her actions on her social media, who said they ‘could not be more proud’ of her.

She then shared a picture of herself in a suggestive stance, wearing nothing but her pants and sports socks, along with the lyrics to the song “Milkshake” and a link to her Onlyfans website.

Thomas-Bowen previously called for Britons to abstain from the late Queen’s Diamond Jubilee and expressed her support for Jeremy Corbyn on Facebook.

Although this woman is not a protestor, she was seeking a promotion—exactly what the media is currently doing. She’ll be on Love Island next!

However, you need to see her online photographs to see what she looks like in real life. Another one that uses industry filters and is utterly deluded.

This woman is a mother and she appears to be putting money before her child, who will be constantly mocked in school, which will affect their mental health, which makes her selfish with no self-respect or morals.

To put it briefly, she attacked a public servant. Though I’m not a big fan of Nigel Farage, the law remains the law as long as you can get the police to show up.

No one has the right to assault somebody else, especially with the excuse of, ‘I don’t agree with your views’, and this lady should not be allowed to profit from it either, but our lily-livered politicians will do nothing to deter this sort of behaviour, which could be acid next time.

A ‘Dystopian’ Apartment Block With 20,000 Residents Who Never Leave

One of the biggest apartment complexes in China is home to thousands of people, and because of its excellent amenities, its occupants never really have to leave.

Because you want it to be as flawless as possible, finding the appropriate location to live might be challenging.

You want to be sure that it’s inexpensive, convenient for visiting friends and family, in a good area for business, and perhaps even offers entertainment nearby.

Imagine being able to obtain everything you need without ever having to leave your apartment complex.

Would that be a utopian dream or a dystopian nightmare?

In one of China’s biggest towers, it appears like at least 20,000 individuals are experiencing that reality.

Within Qianjiang Century City, which is the primary business sector of Hangzhou, there is a massive complex called the Regent International that is home to thousands of people.

Now, why don’t the people living here tend to leave? Well, because all of their necessities are pretty close to them.

Of course, the building cannot provide fresh air unless you open a window, so you’re probably going to want to head for some air and stretch your legs once in a while.

Standing at 675 feet tall and with 260,000 square metres of area, the stunning edifice is among China’s tallest structures.

Though the facility can hold up to 30,000 people, it only has about 20,000 people living there at the moment.

You’re undoubtedly thinking about all the incredible amenities this skyscraper offers to keep people in. Well, a lot depends on which side of the structure you reside on.

But whatever side it may be, you are going to find facilities just like you’d find in your local town.

There’s a huge food court, medium-sized supermarkets, barbershops, nail salons, swimming pools, and even internet cafés.

The building’s amenities were featured on TikTok, which caused it to go viral on social media.

Although the interior is undoubtedly magnificent, the building’s immense size is what has drawn a lot of attention online.

Amazing drone footage highlights the building’s enormity in a video that user @fatheristheone posted to TikTok.

The structure was supposed to be a six-star establishment when it was created by Alicia Loo, the principal designer of the Singapore Sands Hotel, the second-highest hotel in the world.

But it now thrives as a building boasting thousands of apartments and hosting even more residents.

It’s now been labelled ‘the most sustainable living building on Earth’.

Would you be willing to live there? Perhaps not, but get used to it because, in years to come, this is what our lives will look like. I certainly wouldn’t want to be the Amazon delivery guy delivering to that area!

Let’s hope there isn’t a fire!

On The Day Keir Starmer Told Voters He “Knows How It Feels To Struggle With Bills,” He Wore A £500 Sandro Coat

Sir Keir Starmer was spotted wearing a £500 coat on the campaign trail, and on the same day he told voters he ‘knows what it feels like to struggle with bills’.

On the other hand, after having his greatest day of the campaign, Rishi Sunak was spotted in casual attire boarding a sleeper train in Penzance.

During a trip to Brighton, the opposition leader wore opulent clothing from upscale French brand Sandro.

The chief of Labour donned a detachable hood on his blue coat and a navy t-shirt when addressing electors in the coastal city, according to The Sun.

Sir Keir was then seen sporting a more humble England football hoodie, which has a comparatively cheap £50 price tag, as he left his London property.

In doing so, he ignored the warnings of his aides, who, it was reported by Labour insiders, advised him not to put on a Three Lions shirt during the election campaign for fear of upsetting Scottish voters. 

When Rishi Sunak had a good day of campaigning, he was seen getting off a night train wearing a light grey sweatshirt, tracksuit pants, and sneakers.

When the prime minister visited a construction site in 2022 as part of the Tory leadership campaign, he was made fun of for wearing £500 Prada loafers, a pricey fashion choice.

On that occasion, Mr Sunak stood next to the north-east region’s mayor, Ben Houchen, in brown suede shoes while doubling down on his proposed remedies to the cost-of-living crisis. 

Despite a disastrous first week, the Prime Minister was grinning in Penzance as the most recent polls indicated he was closing the gap with Sir Keir.

A startling new survey released indicated that Labour’s advantage over the Tories had shrunk to just 12 points. Mr Sunak appears to have bounced back from his initial days in office, during which he made his first address in the rain and posed at Belfast’s Titanic yard.

The Conservatives are at 28%, up two points from the beginning of May, while Sir Keir Starmer’s party is at 40%.

Labour’s lead has slipped from 18 points in April to 15 points in early May, according to the polling by J.L. Partners carried out on Friday and Saturday.

The pollster said the main reason behind the tightening of the polls was a shift among over-65s, with the Conservatives going from a 10-point lead over Labour to a 20-point lead in the age group.

It comes as Diane Abbott might be blocked from being a party candidate at the upcoming General Election, with even Keir Starmer’s allies branding him ‘disgraceful’ for ‘humiliating’ the veteran MP.

Ms Abbott was suspended from Labour’s parliamentary party for more than a year amid an investigation into her comments about Jewish people in a letter to the Observer newspaper in April 2023.

Fewer Tory voters—23 percent—also now say they would consider voting for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, down 10 points since early May.

The poll’s results indicate a clear Labour win, even if the Conservatives—who had long anticipated that Sir Keir’s advantage would shrink once the election was called—will applaud them.

It also found that six in 10 voters—60 percent—think that it is time for a change of government, and Sir Keir has a 12-point advantage when voters are asked who would make the best PM.

The poll suggested the top emotion in the event of a Rishi Sunak win would be ‘disappointed’, while only nine percent said they would be ‘happy’.

Labour and the Tories declined to comment on the findings, but a Labour source pointed to Sir Keir’s previous warnings against ‘complacency’.

JL Partners conducted the polling for the Rest is Politics podcast on May 24 and 25, following the announcement of the election.

Regarding their results, James Johnson of JL Partners remarked, “Let’s see if the trend continues, as this was just one poll.”

Starmer is yet another multimillionaire Labour leader, the same as most of the others. He has absolutely nothing in common with the ordinary working man in this country. He is, in reality, no different from Cameron, Johnson, and the rest. He just has to pretend a little more.

However, I fear that Labour will get in! The Conservatives have done a diabolical job and have made biblical mistakes. I think it’s time for a change, so I’ll be voting for a different party altogether.

Just keep in mind that politicians do not understand what it’s like to struggle!

It always tickles me pink when the super-rich claim they know what it’s like to struggle. They have no idea how it is to struggle when they were all born with a silver spoon in their mouths. I am also incensed when the super-rich, especially pop stars and actors, tell us that we should donate our money to the latest cause.

No MP struggles to pay bills of any kind because they’re protected by the bank of the taxpayer.

Daniel Kretinsky’s EP Group Buys Royal Mail For £3.57 Billion

The board of International Distribution Services, which owns Royal Mail, said that it has accepted a £3.57 billion buyout bid from the EP Group, led by Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky.

Businessman Mr Kretinsky already owned more than a quarter of IDS, which controls Royal Mail, Parcelforce, and the international mailing service GLS.

Known as the ‘Czech Sphinx’ for his inscrutable nature, his purchase of IDS – which may yet be subject to government scrutiny – could take the UK’s 500-year-old postal service into full foreign ownership for the first time. 

The postal service must maintain its UK headquarters and tax residence to remain connected to Britain, and the EP Group’s bid, which is valued at 370p per share, complies with this requirement from IDS executives.

However, the deal looks set to include Royal Mail’s pending ask of delivering second class post every other weekday – which it applied to Ofcom for earlier this month, pending consultation.

Shareholders will vote on the deal at IDS’s next annual general meeting in September – at a perilous time for Britain’s universal postal service. The deal values the group at £5.2 billion.

Keith Williams, chairman of the company, said: ‘IDS has the potential to become a leading international logistics player.

‘Both the IDS board and EP are acutely aware of their responsibilities to IDS and particularly to the unique heritage of Royal Mail and its obligations as the designated Universal Service Provider of postal services in the UK.

‘The IDS Board has negotiated a far-reaching package of legally binding undertakings and commitments which provide our customers, employees and broader stakeholders with important safeguards.

‘These cover the provision of the one-price-goes-anywhere Universal Service Obligation (including First Class letters still delivered six days a week), the financial stability and maintenance of the IDS Group including Royal Mail, the maintenance of employee benefits and pensions, and ensuring Royal Mail remains headquartered and tax resident in the UK.’

These promises, coupled with a vow not to take away the company’s assets and to continue using the Royal Mail brand and Royal Cypher, are only guaranteed for the first five years of Mr. Kretinsky’s ownership of IDS.

These assurances, coupled with commitments to acknowledge unions and keep providing first-rate posts six days a week, are not guaranteed to stay in effect after five years.

Mr Kretinsky said he had the ‘utmost respect for Royal Mail’s history and tradition’. The deal is not believed to come with any requirements of redundancies beyond those factored into the Royal Mail’s existing cost-cutting plans.

We have been let down by successive Governments for decades. To selling off our gold cheaply and those raiding our pensions, as well as, selling off our industries and key national assets.

Because it was British with royal authorisation, it was known as Royal Mail. Since it will no longer be controlled by the British, how in the world can it remain under that name?

Our power has been sold off, our water and now our postal service, where the service goes down the pan and prices go up.

Trans Children, LGBTQ Community: Richard Dreyfuss

An attendee at Richard Dreyfuss’s question and answer session in Massachusetts over Memorial Day weekend told DailyMail.Com the Oscar-winner ‘kept going’ with homophobic and racist comments during his appearance. 

Dreyfuss, 76, was attending the $300 per person showing of Jaws, the hit movie that began his legendary career in 1975, at The Cabot, a Beverley, Massachusetts, cinema.

The renowned actor took his opportunity to rail against the MeToo movement, transgender children, and the legendary Barbra Streisand after taking to the stage wearing a dress. 

Kerry, one of the attendees, told DailyMail.com that she was visiting The Cabot with her sister as a birthday present.

‘He started the night by coming out in a dress and dancing to Taylor Swift, saying that this was an LGBTQ moment. I assumed he was horsing around; later, a staff member told me he was walking around town for a couple of hours picking one out,’ she said.

Kerry said that the show then got back on the rails with Dreyfuss discussing his role in another Steven Spielberg classic, 1978’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

From there, however, Kerry said Dreyfuss went off, targeting his Nuts co-star Barbra Streisand. ‘He began to say a lot of sexist things about her, about all women. They’re stupid, they shouldn’t have any power, etc.’ He continued.

Other accounts say that Dreyfuss accused women of being ‘passive’ which is why the 1987 film Nuts ‘sucked.’ 

‘Then he just kept going with homophobic and racist comments. He insulted the MeToo movement, etc.’ 

Another member of the crowd said Dreyfuss said that society, ‘Shouldn’t be listening to some 10-year-old who says they want to be a boy instead of a girl.’ 

Kerry said that the atmosphere in the theatre quickly soured, with many booing the star and some walking out. ‘Now, now, don’t turn into an angry mob,’ Dreyfuss told the crowd, according to Kerry.

Kerry alleged that an employee of The Cabot told her that staff had been told to prepare for Dreyfuss’s bizarre behaviour the night before a similar incident occurred at a similar event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. 

An attendee of that show was quoted by Deadline as saying: ‘I walked out tonight because of [Dreyfuss’s] small-minded, bigoted view of women and choice.’ 

At one point during his Cabot show, Dreyfuss said: ‘We’re so fragile that we can’t have our feelings hurt. We don’t know how to stand up and bop the bully in the face.’

‘There is a time and place for that stuff, most likely a Republican rally, but not at a Jaws event.’

‘He’s rich; entitled; he didn’t care about anyone but himself last night. It was never a discussion; it was him being ignorant and inappropriate. I expected better.’

‘Someone should ask Steven Spielberg what he thinks about Dreyfuss saying these things at a showing of his movie,’ Kerry added. 

The attendee went on to say that she felt as though Dreyfuss was doing something for a book. ‘I felt he was conducting a warped social experiment to prove some points in his book. That we can’t disagree on things civilly, etc., that’s my opinion,’ Kerry said. 

In 2022, Dreyfuss published his book One Thought Scares Me: We Teach Our Children What We Wish Them to Know; We Don’t Teach Our Children What We Don’t Wish Them to Know, which dealt with the subject of teaching civics in American schools.

The actor is passionate about the cause of civic education. 

It is never appropriate to praise hate speech. Richard Dreyfuss displayed his ignorance and callousness.

Some might say that it’s not hate speech and that it’s only an opinion like it was only an opinion when Hitler persecuted the Jews – remember that Richard Dreyfuss?

Everybody is entitled to be what they want to be, and people who do not believe that being transgender or LGBTQ is natural, well, there are two types of male oysters, and one of them can change genders at will, and before man crawled out of the muck, maybe he had the same option. Maybe originally we were supposed to be able to switch genders, and being born with just one sex is a mutation. Clearly, Richard Dreyfuss was that mutation! And I welcome the bigoted man to say differently.

Rishi Sunak’s Controversial Election Plan Could Fine Parents If Their 18-Year-Olds Don’t Do National Service 

Parents may be fined if their adult children fail to do their National Service when they turn 18, a minister suggested today.

In response to Rishi Sunak’s election plan to force teenagers to serve a year in the military or perform unpaid weekend community labour, Anne-Marie Trevelyan declined to rule out financial penalties.

The proposition was made public and has since sparked the first significant controversy of the upcoming general election campaign.

The Foreign Office Minister, Ms Trevelyan, stated that a Royal Commission would outline many of the scheme’s specifics and declined to rule out penalising parents whose adult offspring declined to participate.

She also suggested that carers and young members of the Royal family would be expected to take part.

However, criticism of the scheme has increased. Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer branded it a ‘teenage Dad’s Army’ in a speech today.

Perhaps the most startling critique came from a second senior minister,ister who said they had been taken by surprise by the plan.

Writing on social media, Steve Baker, the Northern Ireland Minister, suggested had it been a government policy, he would have had a say because of the particular sensitives around Northern Ireland.

He said: ‘Government policy would have been developed by ministers on the advice of officials and collectively agreed. I would have had a say on behalf of NI.

‘But this proposal was developed by a political adviser or advisers and sprung on candidates, some of whom are relevant ministers.’

According to the manifesto, all 18-year-olds would serve one year in the armed forces in a paid position or dedicate one weekend a month to volunteer work in the community.

Writing for MailOnline today Ms Trevelyan said that those volunteering for the military would not be sent to fight, and that the scheme would teach practical and soft skills ‘which cannot be taught in the classroom or the lecture theatre’.

However, opponents from both political parties have written off the proposals as nonsensical, and prominent military personnel have voiced doubts about their viability and recommended that the funds would be better used for investments in the armed forces.

Asked about whether young royals would be made to take part, or teenagers with caring responsibilities, Ms Trevelyan told Sky News it would be down to a Royal Commission to decide the scope.

The return of National Service is a good idea since it helps young people mature into men and women and instils in them values of discipline and respect. However, it should not be implemented carelessly, as many politicians—Sir Keir Starmer in particular—do.

There are so many young people out of work and not looking for work, this will help address that, with youngsters getting new experiences, a career and new friendships.

This should be a compulsory measure by our government, not a fine measure that parents have to fork out for. Eighteen-year-olds are neither kids nor adults, they are the inbetweeners, and if they feel they don’t want to do National Service, then they should remain in education until they’re twenty-five. There would be less unemployment for start.

There should be no provisions stating that your child would be immediately disqualified if they attend private school or if they have a parent or parents named Portia or Xander. This should apply to everyone!

The problem that is, this has not been thought out well. National Service, is great! However, there aren’t enough housing, weaponry or training facilities available for our present soldiers, let alone new ones.

The 16-Year-Old Vote Plan By Keir Starmer 

Keir Starmer’s plan to give 16-year-olds the right to vote would ‘rig’ the electoral system against the Conservatives for years to come, Tories have claimed.

If the Labour leader wins the July general election, he allegedly intends to decrease the voting age in his first year in office.

More than 1.5 million people under the age of 18 would be granted the ability to vote, making it the biggest modification to the electoral system since the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1969.

Sir Keir said: ‘Yes, I want to see 16 and 17-year-olds voting. If you can work, if you can pay tax, if you can serve in your Armed Forces, then you ought to be able to vote.’

Speaking on a visit to Stafford, Sir Keir added that young people ‘should have a say on how their money is being used’.

Opponents argue young people are too immature to make informed political judgments, with the policy branded ‘cynical’ because it is expected to benefit Labour.

Tory MP Tom Hunt said it was ‘an attempt by Labour to rig the vote in their favour’, adding: ‘The motivation behind this is perceived political self-interest, nothing else.’

Fellow Tory MP Bob Seely said: ‘Labour haven’t even won and already they are trying to rig the voting system. 

‘Perhaps Labour think younger voters will be easier to pull the wool over than older folks with a bit of life experience.’

And Sir Iain Duncan Smith accused Sir Keir of ‘virtue signalling’, adding: ‘This is a gimmick done by those who think their party is more likely to get the vote.’

Labour has been closely studying how Scotland and Wales cut the voting age. In Scotland, those aged 16 can vote in local and Scottish Parliament elections, while in Wales they can vote in local and Welsh Parliament elections.

In Scotland, the procedure took less than six months, whilst the Welsh law was enacted less than a year after it was first proposed.

A Labour source told The Times the move ‘has the double benefit of not costing very much to do but of helping secure a second Labour term’. Analysis by the newspaper showed that if 16 and 17-year-olds voted in the same way as those aged 18-24, an extra eight seats would switch from the Tories to Labour.

Ashfield MP Lee Anderson, while he was Tory party deputy chairman, said extending the vote to 16-year-olds would mean the Conservatives would be ‘done for’.

When the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1969, most young people left school at 15, myself included, and by their 18th birthday would have had three years working in the real world and would have acquired life experiences on which to base any political decisions. Today most now leave at 18 with no life experiences and because of this, the voting age should be increased back to 21 not lowered to 16.

Most young people will vote for a political party like they would support a football team to win. So, these youngsters might be able to vote, but would still be politically ignorant. 

Many years ago, you went to work at a young age, but by the time you were old enough to vote, at least you had real-life experiences. Today, youngsters have to stay in education or training until they’re 18 years old, but when they leave they still have naivety and unworldliness so should not be allowed to vote until they have some life experiences.

I also suspect that many young voters would be swayed by a single issue such as university fees, rather than taking in the wider problems affecting the country, and lowering the voting age will do nothing to ensure the right balance of policies.

A Model Reveals An Appallingly Inappropriate Question A Nurse Asked Her 10-Year-Old 

A model disclosed the egregiously improper questions she claimed a nurse posed to her 10-year-old daughter following her hospitalisation for a feline bite.

Robin O’Malley, a model and radio show co-host, shared the bizarre interaction that occurred after the nurses asked her to leave the room to ask her daughter questions. The mother did not reveal the name of the hospital where the incident occurred.

During a recent episode of The Outlaws Radio Show, O’Malley sat down with her other fellow co-hosts and said that the topic of the conversation is ‘very triggering,’ especially for parents.

O’Malley began the account with hesitation, revealing that staff at the hospital that must remain nameless had questioned her daughter about her sexual activity and whether or not she had ever used alcohol or smoked.

‘I’ve worked so hard to protect her, just for these nurses to ruin her innocence in a split second when all we did was go to the hospital for a cat bite,’ O’Malley said. 

‘I’m not gonna state what hospital,’ the mother said, adding that her daughter was admitted into the paediatric wing.

She then went over the ‘normal questions’ that nurses and doctors ask patients, including if they feel like harming themselves or if they feel safe at home. 

‘And so, these nurses asked me to leave the room for a moment so they could ask my daughter some questions.’ 

‘I was thinking that they were going to ask those very questions I just listed, and those were not, in fact, the questions that they asked her,’ O’Malley said. 

The model said that her daughter is still an ‘innocent,’ ‘normal child,’ who ‘doesn’t try to act older than her age.’ 

O’Malley said: ‘So these nurses asked my 10-year-old daughter if she was having sex and does she drink and smoke?’

After questioning her child, O’Malley said that one of the nurses came out of the room and told her that she ‘may have opened up a can of worms.’ 

‘And I’m like, “What do you mean?’ 

‘And she said, “Uh, I asked her if she’s having sex and she was very confused on what I asked her so now she’s kind of curious”,’ O’Malley recalled. 

The mother then went into the room, where she was ‘immediately’ greeted by her daughter, who asked: ‘Mommy, what’s sex?’ 

‘Oh, okay. So now, I am very livid. I’m very, very, very upset because my innocent 10-year-old child, who I fought so hard to protect her innocence from this already crazy world, just for these nurses to ruin her innocence in a split second when all we did was go to the hospital for a cat bite,’ O’Malley explained.

‘Wow,’ one of her co-hosts responded. 

She then detailed how the questions the nurses asked didn’t sit well with her. 

‘I find that to be an issue because it’s not that they were asking her that because they felt something was wrong,’ O’Malley said.

‘They asked her that because now, apparently, this is a new thing that hospitals ask children starting from the age of seven.’ 

‘And they do not communicate that with the parent beforehand.’ 

After a brief moment of silence, her co-host, Darvio ‘Kingpen’ Morrow, said: ‘Yeah, that’s outrageous. That’s absolutely outrageous.’ 

‘The fact that they thought it was a good idea to do this, and the fact that they did, the most important thing is not only did they do this with a 10-year-old, but they did it without telling you first,’ he added.

‘Because you could have told them, “Aye, don’t do that”,’ Morrow said. 

‘Right,’ O’Malley replied.

 ‘And the fact that they did that without your consent—- that’s wild.’ 

O’Malley said that she was left ‘absolutely fuming’ and ‘distraught’ over the interaction. 

‘I’m pretty sure smoke was coming out of my ears, like, I was heated,’ she said. 

The radio co-host said that she didn’t see the nurse again after she asked her daughter those questions. 

Morrow then said that the entire situation would have been different if O’Malley’s daughter was at the hospital for something that had to do with that ‘region.’ 

‘Like, it was a cat bite,’ said, aid laughing before he added: ‘What are we doing?’ 

The frustrated mother said that following the awkward exchange, she told her friend who works at that hospital. 

‘She was like, “Unfortunately, they make us ask that question now, starting from the age of seven years old”,’ O’Malley said. 

‘And I was like, that is so f’d up.’

 ‘That nurse destroyed that innocent part of her,’ she added. 

The moral of this story is, to never leave your child alone during a visit to the hospital or the doctors. Never leave your child alone with any adult or authority figures, and you should find it highly suspicious if anybody asks to be alone with your child.

To be honest, I wouldn’t have left the room because there would be no way my 10-year-old was going to be alone in a room with anyone.

This woman states that she’s tried to protect her daughter’s innocence, so does that mean that she’s never had a conversation with her daughter about what to do if someone were to touch her inappropriately? Is this keeping her daughter from being aware of what can happen in the world, and sometimes children of sexual abuse have trouble describing what happened to them because they don’t even know the anatomical terms of use.

She has to identify the hospital if this is indeed what happened. In addition, is this lady really under the impression that her 10-year-old child has never heard the term “sex”? It’s very common these days!

This mother ought to have protested the instant the nurse requested her to leave the room. The state does not raise children; families do.

It is impossible to keep your child innocent forever, and if you don’t teach them about their bodies and sex, older kids will, and they will take advantage of their ignorance. Additionally, children who don’t understand what sex is can’t establish appropriate boundaries.

Parents, talk to your children before you even think they need to hear it or someone else will!

The Knickers Of Librarian Sharon Mawdsley Were Paraded In Prison

A married prison librarian whose underpants were paraded around a jail wing ‘like a trophy’ after a sexual relationship with an inmate has been spared jail.

Mum-of-two Sharon Mawdsley, 47, from Blackpool, shared steamy text messages and had sex with Steven Morrell in the library office at HMP Kirkham.

Their two-week affair came to an end after staff member Sarah Fleming heard whispers among prison inmates and reported her concerns.

Mawdsley’s underwear was allegedly shown to other inmates at Kirkham prison as over 20 prisoners stood outside their cell doors before lock up, a jury was told.

A former prisoner who claimed to have seen this also claimed that Mawdsley had molested him sexually.

He told a court: ‘He [Morrell] took her underwear and when everyone was standing at the doors one evening, he showed them like a trophy.

‘There were over 20 prisoners who saw it.’

Mawdsley was informed on July 6, 2018, that she should not go back to work, and Morrell was sent to a different jail.

After his cell was searched, a secret iPhone was found hidden in a laundry bag, along with a piece of paper with Mawdsley’s personal phone number scrawled on it.

Three days later, she admitted giving Morrell her phone number and engaging in ‘unlawful conversations and text messages’.

She was aware that he had a phone, but she chose not to alert the jail staff.

Mawdsley pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office in connection with the phone contact with Morrell in January 2024.

However, she only acknowledged having sex with Morrell when questioned about claims that she had sexually assaulted two other prisoners in the library.

The prosecutor, Wayne Jackson, stated that Mawdsley worked ten hours a week at HMP Kirkham.

She had been screened for the position and trained in anti-corruption measures.

Alli Black, the Governor of HMP Kirkham, said: ‘Where an inappropriate relationship develops, the authority of that staff member and other members of staff is diminished.’

If professional boundaries were not respected, she added, staff members may be coerced into smuggling narcotics or cell phones into jail.

Anthony Parkinson, defending, said Mawdsley has ‘an impeccable past history – apart from these two weeks of madness in the Summer of 2018’.

In addition, he emphasised that the defendant had experienced a protracted delay and public humiliation as a result of media attention.

Although Mawdsley and her spouse are no longer together, he nonetheless supported his ex-wife in a letter to the court.

Two other prisoners claimed the librarian had abused them in the library following the inquiry.

The mother of two was exonerated of all additional counts after the trial in April.

During that trial, she confessed to having sex with Morrell.

She returned to Preston Crown Court to face a sentence for a single count of misconduct in a public office.

Given the behaviour of people in authority, it’s no surprise that jails are becoming less like prisons and more like retirement communities for illegal behaviour.

Today’s prisons serve as hubs for gang recruitment, criminal training, and networking, and the majority of state-employed law enforcement personnel are either untrustworthy or poorly trained.

A pair of elephantine pants would not pique most men’s interest, but it takes all kinds, and why does a prison need a librarian? Surely a half-educated inmate could arrange books.

This kind of activity is unacceptable, and prisoners would thrive on it as it relieves boredom; therefore, the woman was fortunate to be released.

The sad thing is that these women believe that male prisoners love them, but they need to realise that they’re just being used for sex and whatever else they can get from them, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the prisoners in question now sue for PTSD.

This prisoner who pumped this lady should be released immediately; he’s been punished enough! After all, she is a hefty lady and there would never be a shovel to fill that hole.

These men are behind bars for a reason, because they’ve done wrong, and now so has she. This was an offence, and this woman should have faced jail like others do.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started