Police Boost Patrols In South East London

Police intensified patrols in South East London after children were followed or approached by men in four separate incidents in one week as schools prompted concerned parents to tell their children to be on high alert.

Scotland Yard detectives accepted parents have genuine concern and worry about the spate of incidents which occurred when two boys were approached separately by a man in Bromley on April 30 between 4 pm and 4.40 pm.

An 11-year-old boy, who’s the son of Line of Duty actress Sherise Blackman, was asked by a man in a black van on a road if he wanted a lift, while an eight-year-old was approached in the nearby wooded region of Kelsey Park.

The Metropolitan Police got another report on Thursday of a male school pupil being followed by a man along a street on the preceding day, but a lack of similarities indicated it wasn’t connected with the first two reports.

The latest incident, which is again not thought to be connected to any of the other three reports, involved a third person reported of the perceived attempted abduction of a young girl at The Glades shopping centre.

Two men were said to have been walking behind the girl when one appeared to try to grab the girl’s hand, which was raised in the air, before walking off. No children were kidnapped or injured in any of the four incidents.

Now, police have written to local parents via schools, urging them to warn their children of the personal safety advice they’ve been given and to report anything suspicious immediately to a parent, guardian or school staff.

They added that they understood the real concern and worry that the nature of the incidents had brought to them and their family, but they assured them that they were working jointly with their schools to give added support and advice.

And they said that they would encourage the public to remain alert, but not to be unnecessarily alarmed, and that child kidnappings and abductions were, thankfully, incredibly rare, but that they were not complacent.

They said that to provide reassurance to the community, they’ve raised their visible presence in regions where youngsters may gather and that they advised anyone who feels anxious or concerned to approach their officers.

And that they would strongly encourage members of the public to approach their officers if they have any concerns or have any information that could prove to be advantageous to their investigation.

It comes after the Met apologised to Ms Blackman after she criticised the force, and said they were failing to properly investigate the attempted abduction of her son.

The actress, who appeared as firearms officer Ruby Jones in the BBC police drama Line of Duty, said her son was walking home from school when two men on the street and another man in a black vehicle attempted to grab him.

Sadly London is so intimidating now, and the legal and justice system is a farce, and our Police force is held back by politics and bureaucracy to gratify their masters, rather than serve the public who pay them, and the police need to locate these people because they appear to be up to something sinister.

And a serious shift in the law needs to take place before a child is harmed or even disappears, but it would also help if the public were given some description of these men, and what will it take for the police to take this sort of thing seriously?

And many of our police are afraid of their own shadow and should have continuous training, particularly when a crime has previously been reported, and it’s about time we had beat cops walking our streets and school zones, and not ones that are afraid of their own shadow!


Derek Chauvin and the three other former Minneapolis police officers involved in George Floyd’s death have now been indicted on federal charges for violating his civil rights.

A federal grand jury indicted Derek Chauvin, 45, Thomas Lane, 38, J Alexander Kueng, 27, and Tou Thao, 35, accusing them of willfully infringing George Floyd’s civil rights as he was restrained face down on the sidewalk, gasping for air.

All four cops have been charged with failing to give medical attention to George Floyd as he lay dying on the streets of Minneapolis last May.

Chauvin, Thao and Kueng are also charged with infringing George Floyd’s right to be free from extreme seizure and unnecessary restraint.

Derek Chauvin was also charged in a second indictment, over a 2017 incident where he knelt on a black 14-year-old boy’s neck for almost 17 minutes. This is the first time the convicted killer has ever faced charges over this incident.

The federal civil rights charges, similar to hate crimes, are separate from the state’s which led to Derek Chauvin’s trial and murder conviction last month.

The other three officers face trial together on August 23 on state charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder and manslaughter.

The two indictments were unsealed on Friday.

Thomas Lane, Tou Thao and J Kueng appeared by videoconference in US District Court in Minneapolis, while Derek Chauvin was not part of the court appearance.

The first indictment contained three counts.

The indictment reads that count one of the indictment claims that on May 25, 2020, Derek Chauvin held his left knee across George Floyd’s neck, and his right knee on George Floyd’s back and arm, as George Floyd lay on the ground, handcuffed and unresisting, and Derek Chauvin kept his knees on Mr Floyd’s neck and body even after George Floyd became unresponsive.

This infringed George Floyd’s constitutional right to be free from the use of extreme restraint by a police officer that resulted in George Floyd’s injury and death.

The second count charges Thao and Kueng for failing to intervene to prevent Derek Chauvan’s use of extreme force.

The third count alleges all four cops saw George Floyd lying on the ground in obvious need of medical attention and failed to help him, and according to the indictment, by doing so, all four defendants willfully denied George Floyd his constitutional right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law, which included the arrestee’s right to be free from a police officer’s deliberate disregard to his serious medical need.

George Floyd may have committed a wrongful movement, but it still didn’t give the police the freedom to kill him, irrelevant to his previous history.

The money may have been counterfeit but it can’t be proved that George Floyd knew it was counterfeit. How many people have been walking about with counterfeit money in their pocketbook and not known about it? And does this mean that every person who’s walking around with counterfeit money should be dragged to the ground with a knee on their neck until they are dead? And if people say yes, then this was just a witch hunt! But of course, stupid comments will continue.

Sadly America is no longer America, and individual liberty in the US is dead, and this should not be about race, it should just be about police brutality, and police brutality is important because the truth is white people are not targeted in the same way.

And these cops were all accessories to the fact, and they should all be charged with murder and convicted, and these four officers have created the biggest race storm in history, and the lesson will still not be learnt.

These four thought it was a great idea to sit on a suspect who could not defend himself until he died and YOU could be next!

Why Do People Post Offensive Comments Online?

There’s an estimated total of 44 million social media users in the United Kingdom at Statistica’s last count, which was in early 2018.

That’s 66 per cent of us who are selfie-ing, Story-ing and Snapchatting every day, and while many would now count a scroll through Instagram as part of their everyday routine, most would also agree it’s not long before they spot a mean comment left by a stranger, to another stranger.

The word troll became much more than a grouchy fairytale character back in 2014 when its Oxford Dictionary definition was updated to incorporate ‘a person who makes a willfully offensive or provocative online post’.

Nowadays, it’s normal for news sites to have anti trolling systems in place for their comments sections, and the likes of Chrissy Teigen, Gigi Hadid and Amy Schumer are just some of the stars that openly call out online tormentors.

The Duchess of Sussex, before she joined the royal family, even spoke out about how online negativity affected her, and TV presenter Caroline Flack suffered trolling in the months before her unfortunate death, but what is the motive behind posting these repugnant messages?

Well, research has shown that trolls tend to have an inability to form healthy relationships offline, and they’re not always the sad, bitter loners that we might expect, and not always men, female trolls are on the increase, but their relationships will certainly lack stability and they may feel that they’re not valued enough by their families or partner.

Often, they lose a feeling of responsibility and self-awareness, a process known as deindividuation, and their anonymity means that they do not need to regulate their behaviour online.

It’s comparable to the way people might behave in a raucous crowd or as a football hooligan, normal rules of social engagement are lost in the masses.

Trolling is deemed a more specific kind of behaviour. It’s people who engage in inappropriate behaviour by posting damaging content purely as it’s an end in its own right.

The reasons for this are due to various factors, including seeking entertainment value and certain personality traits such as sadism and psychopathy. And they’re driven by status. Attracting attention, hurting or upsetting people, even getting online support from other trolls, which gives them a feeling of self-worth and importance that is likely lacking in their day to day offline lives.

As for posting hurtful messages to celebrities and those in the public eye, it’s the visibility that reinforces the behaviour, and it amplifies all these elements of course.

It’s part of the excitement and entertainment that even those trolls who choose not to be nameless find even more acceptable, as they can easily see provocative and spiteful remarks made by others.

But we shouldn’t react to these rude people on social media because it’s so easy to encounter rude people and react to the racing heartbeat and flushed face that they’ve caused you, and when it happens you must understand it isn’t about you.

And it’s the anonymity factor that contributes to online incivility and the actual lack of eye contact that enables them to be particularly offensive to people.

These people are continually negative and critical, so their attitude is bound to affect the way they view others, and people with low self-esteem frequently conceal their own insecurities by flexing their verbal muscles, being rude and insensitive, in an endeavour to make themselves feel strong.

Twitter And Facebook Shut Down Fake Propaganda

We hear a lot about groups creating social media accounts to influence discourse, and these groups should be made to shut down when they’re full of prejudice, discrimination and hostility, which is a crime.

And these pages and groups are the tools Facebook misinformation peddlers love the most, and people are creating a network of anonymous pages, which is the easiest way to quickly spread fake news or propaganda on the social network.

Facebook has of course taken down a cohort of deceptive pages linked to fraudulent news, and the social network has changed its policies, but it appears this is still not enough, and there should be better methods to crack down on these pages and groups.

Facebook has historically played Whac-a-Mole when it comes to systems of dishonest pages, even when they’re run by the same person, and if a troll runs two fake news pages but only one of them violates Facebook’s policies, the company can’t take down the other until it infringes the rules as well.

The fact is propaganda on social media is being used to mould public opinion around the globe, and not in a good way, and lies, garbage and misinformation of traditional propaganda is extensive online and is supported by Facebook or Twitter’s algorithms.

At their simpler end, techniques are used to include automated accounts to like, share and post on social networks.

Such accounts can serve as game algorithms to promote content on to curated social feeds, and they can drown out real, reasoned debate between humans in favour of a social network populated by argument and soundbites, and they can simply make online measures of support, such as the number of likes, look more generous, which is essential in creating the image of popularity.

And some of these groups intentionally distribute fraudulent news, deceptions, propaganda and disinformation purporting to be real news, often using social media to drive web traffic and increase their effectiveness.

If you define this, this is bogus news on the internet to intentionally invent and mislead browsers, and this misleading information that’s going viral online is one of the biggest menaces faced by society.

Bogus news has been around for numerous years, but with the explosion of the internet and social media, it’s getting more difficult to know what can and can’t be believed.

Human beings are pretty social creatures, and we tend to need the company of others to thrive in life, and the strength of our connections has an enormous impact on our mental health and happiness.

Being socially connected to others can relieve stress, anxiety, and depression, increase self-worth, provide comfort and joy, prevent isolation, and even add years to your life. On the flip side, lacking strong social connections can pose a serious risk to your mental and emotional well-being.

But social media can also promote negative experiences such as cyberbullying, prejudice, bias and discrimination, with many users being subjected to hateful comments, and can be hotspots for spreading hurtful rumours, lies and abuse that can leave permanent emotional scars.

Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, LinkedIn are ways that connect people on social media and which is limitless, but we shouldn’t let our online life negatively impact our real lives, and social media should NEVER be used to browbeat others, and posting snarky or mean comments is a major no-no because it’s just hurtful and it drags dirty laundry out into the open.

And as we engage on social media with greater regularity, we find ourselves sifting through photos of children, commentary about food, and critical responses on current affairs, but this increased media usage and exposure poses a question, how accurate is this information we’re getting, and more importantly, how honest are people on social media sites?

Hit-And-Run E-Scooter Rider Crashes Into A Three-Year-Old Boy

A three-year-old boy was left with two broken collar bones after being knocked down in an e-scooter hit and run.

The child was struck from behind while walking along the pavement with his grandmother.

The rider of the electric scooter fell off during the crash but remounted and fled from the scene in Feltham High Street, west London at around 6 pm on Saturday.

Paramedics took the boy to the hospital and he has since been discharged.

The police have now started an inquiry into the collision and are asking for anyone who saw it, or has dashcam footage, to come forward.

A Scotland Yard spokesperson said that the police were called at 6 pm on Saturday, April 17 to reports of a collision at High Street (A244), near the junction with Manor Lane, Feltham.

Officers and the London Ambulance Service (LAS) attended and found a three-year-old boy bearing injuries.

Enquiries discovered that the child had been walking on the pavement with his grandmother when he was hit from behind by a person riding an e-scooter on the footpath.

The driver fell from the scooter on collision but re-mounted and drove away without staying at the scene.

The child was taken to hospital by LAS where he was found to have suffered two broken collarbones, but he’s since been discharged.

According to the Department of Transport, it’s illegal to drive privately owned electric scooters on the pavement, roads and cycle paths.

You can only ride your own e-scooter on private property, with consent from the person who owns the land.

Last month, a youth was banned from the roads for two years after he hit a six-year-old boy on a pavement in Leicester while cruising at 25mph, leaving him with severe facial lacerations.

The youth, who can’t be identified for legal purposes, admitted a series of charges including causing a severe injury by hazardous driving.

He also pleaded guilty to failing to stop after a road traffic accident, failing to report a road traffic accident, using a motor vehicle without insurance, using a motor vehicle without an MOT certificate and driving a vehicle otherwise in accordance with a licence.

It comes as London is set to begin a city-wide trial which would see riders allowed to ride rented e-scooters in designated areas across the metropolis, but sadly there’s going to be a lot more of these accidents, and this is a pretty good illustration of why these e-scooters should be outlawed completely.

These e-scooters are dangerous and when they come up behind you, you just don’t hear them speeding past you, and the next person that’s hit could be toast, and they’re becoming a hazard.

This was a terrible incident, but sadly one that was just waiting to happen, and not only that, most of the riders think it’s all pretty entertaining, and why are the police not patrolling them?

This is only the beginning, and if the Government doesn’t get a handle on this, this is going to be a fast-growing menace, and foot-travellers have no protection from fools tearing around our pavements, and there’s precious little in the way of sanctions for anyone injuring anyone.

But now it’s all about this eco-green liberal tripe, and those who advocated for these e-scooters – not such a good idea now, is it? But of course, it doesn’t matter to them if a couple of hundred people die in a year because of all their green policies, as long as they look like they’re trying to green the planet.

Tucker Carlson Maintains That Thirty People A Day Are Dying After Getting COVID Vaccinations

Tucker Carlson maintained that approximately thirty people every day are dying after getting the coronavirus vaccination, sparking backlash in the scientific community.

The Fox News host displayed his outrage at President Joe Biden’s encouraging people to get vaccinated, saying that the social pressure was immense.

Tucker Carlson said that countless viewers will have had their shot and good for them, but said people were not being told enough about the possible dangers.

Tucker Carlson then cited data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), a site run by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which registers any unfavourable response to a vaccine.

Tucker Carlson pointed out that, according to the VAERS statistics, 3,362 people died after getting a COVID vaccine in the United States between December and April 23, and that this was an average of about thirty people every day, but health professionals have said that he’s misrepresenting the VAERS data.

They pointed out that the VAERS database was heavy with disclaimers, which point out that someone dying after receiving a vaccine was not the same as someone dying as a result of the vaccine.

The CDC says that 148 million Americans have now been vaccinated, with huge benefits to the well-being of the nation, and health experts pointed out that the risks have been investigated, and considered minimal.

Tucker maintained that there were far fewer deaths recorded by VAERS after other vaccines, such as the flu jab, and suggested that the Democratic administration currently in power needed to examine what was occurring.

He said that vaccines are not dangerous. And he said that was not a guess, and that they knew pretty conclusively from the official figures. But he said more investigation was needed into COVID jabs.

He maintained that it was clear that what was occurring now, for whatever reason, was not even close to normal, and that it wasn’t even close to what has been seen in previous years with prior vaccines, and he said that most vaccines were not accused of killing vast numbers of people.

The CDC said that the CDC and FDA physicians evaluate each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports and that a review of available clinical information including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records revealed no indication that the vaccination contributed to patient mortality.

EMA’s safety committee (PRAC) concluded that unusual blood clots with low blood platelets should be listed as a somewhat unusual side effect of Vaxzevria (the previously COVID 19 Vaccine AstraZeneca).

And in reaching this conclusion, the committee took into consideration all currently available evidence, including the advice from an ad hoc expert group, and the EMA was reminding healthcare professionals and people getting the vaccine to remain aware of the possibility of extremely rare cases of blood clots, coupled with low levels of blood platelets transpiring inside two weeks of vaccination.

So far, most of the cases reported have occurred in women below 60 years of age inside two weeks of vaccination, but based on the currently obtainable evidence, particular risk factors haven’t been established.

Of course, there will be loads of people out there that will say that Tucker is a fool and a crackpot, but the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has said there is a risk, even though rare, there have been numerous cases. Therefore, it appears that Tucker isn’t such a crackpot after all, unless, of course, people think that the EMA is lying as well.

Laindon Killing

A hunt was on for weapons that were used during a stabbing where a man was stabbed.

Essex Police were asking anyone who knew the whereabouts of the weapon that was used to kill the man who was in his 30s and lived in Laindon.

The victim was found with stab wounds in Iris Mews on Sunday at 9.30 pm but died at the scene.

Five teenagers were detained on suspicion of murder, but so far four have been released without charge.

However, Detective Chief Superintendent Stephen Jennings has urged anyone with information to come forward to the police if they’ve not already done so, and he said that officers were looking to trace any weapons that might have been dumped on the estate encompassing Iris Mews.

Russia Announces Three Tests Of Vladimir Putin’s Invincible New Hypersonic Satan 2

It was announced that Russia is to carry out three tests of its new deadly hypersonic Satan 2 intercontinental ballistic missile this year.

The 208-ton weapon, officially named RS-28 Sarmat, is the biggest beast in Vladimir Putin’s modernised nuclear arsenal and is expected to go into service in 2022.

A defence source told TASS state news agency that three launches of the Sarmat ICBM will be carried out as part of flight development tests in 2021.

The launches are supposed to be from an underground silo at Plesetsk space centre in northwestern Russia hitting targets in Kamchatka on the country’s Pacific coast.

One test is expected to be at a maximum range of 11,200 miles.

According to another TASS source, the first of the three test launches are expected in the third quarter of this year.

Previous footage of the invincible hypersonic weapon, known in the West as Satan 2, during a drop test shows it emerging from its silo, pausing as if hovering above the ground and then speeding to its destination in a cloud of white smoke.

Moscow boasts the new weapon can evade the United States defence shield and is capable of destroying an area the size of England and Wales, or Texas.

This comes amongst the highest tension since the Cold War between Moscow and the West over Ukraine, alleged election meddling, and cyber attacks.

Next year, the Sarmat will start state trials before going into service late in 2022.

TASS was told that the Defence Ministry was already acquiring serially produced missiles, and Russia previously said that they were planning on conducting the flight tests, which will still take place this year, after missile ejection tests, or drop tests, had positive outcomes.

Sarmat supersedes the R-36M2 Voevoda missiles, seen as the most powerful in the world and operational since the 1970s.

The payload of the new age missile is approximately ten tons.

The TASS report said that the Sarmat engines quickly boost the missile to the safe zone and make it safe for the missile defence until it reaches the main flight trajectory.

Its designers said that it can fly by a variable route circumventing missile defence systems. It’s also able to fly over the North and South Pole and approach targets from places that are not envisaged for interception.

But it doesn’t matter how robust the weapon is, you can only die once, and at the end of the day, if Russia launched it, then we would probably all be eliminated and they know it, game over.

If only this money had been put to some good use because there are people out there that don’t even have fresh water to drink. We’re destroying the world, and now all we can do is plan how better to destroy it even further.

And if Russia launched against the United Kingdom, then we would send everything we had back at them, but that would be kind of pointless seeing as everyone would be dead, and it’s such a pity that they have to centre their energy on ways to destroy the planet.

Why can’t they just apply their abilities to something useful like reversing habitat destruction, eradicating cancer or saving endangered species? Anyone would think that they want to destroy the planet, and then they wonder why nobody trusts them.

However, the real weapon is fear, and it’s used against us daily, and they could start a nuclear war, but what will the victor be in charge of, a burnt-out planet, and radioactive for thousands of years, living on tinned food, so enjoy being a prisoner of your own making.

Woman, 47, Is Charged With Attempted Murder

A Maryland woman has been charged with attempted murder after she purportedly set her home on fire while another woman was inside before sitting in a lawn chair to watch it burn.

Gail Metwally, 47, was captured on video watching as the home was overwhelmed by flames in Elkton, approximately 50 miles northeast of Baltimore, about 1.15 pm last Thursday.

Gail Metwally was seen on cell phone footage dressed in a white tank top and sun hat while sitting on the lawn with a book in her lap as she watched as the inferno took hold, and an unknown guy narrates the video as the fire ripped through the home inside minutes while Gail Metwally inadvertently watched from her front lawn.

The man said, ‘She just f**king lit the trash can on fire!’.

‘Oh my fking God, this is not happening right now! She lit the fking house! Oh my God! I cannot actually believe my eyes. I cannot actually believe it, and she’s sitting there just chillin’ — watching the house go up in flames!’

He continues: ‘Like yeah, I’m watching the s–t go down! Oh, my God, this is, this is now turned into a serious, serious thing!’

Eyewitnesses told investigators that they saw Gail Metwally setting multiple fires inside the home before then sitting in the chair, according to a press release from the Office of the State Fire Marshall.

And officials said that after a few minutes, Gail Metwally walked away from the scene.

While the home was on fire, bystanders heard an occupant in a basement window screaming for help and bystanders safely helped her out of the window.

Officials said that a total of four people, including Gail Metwally lived in the home, but two of them were not there.

The woman who was freed from the inferno was named Blenda Holbrook, 52, by WMAR.

Blenda Holbrook’s sister Pat Bernal told the outlet that someone had thrown a garbage can on the stairs obstructing Holbrook’s exit.

Reasons for the arson were not immediately obvious but Bernal told WMAR that Gail Metwally had recently returned to living in the Cherry Lane residence after being confined elsewhere for mental health problems.

The outlet reported that repeated pleas to authorities in recent months to address her continuing behavioural problems had gone ignored, and Bernal said that her sister nearly burned to death in the house.

And it’s difficult to watch the callousness of the offence that was so brazen, and not to have at least a whisper of a voice in your head that questions if actual demons and evil exist in our world.

To do something like this, you have to be psychologically unstable, and this woman urgently needs psychiatric help and has needed it for some time, and whilst she will probably get a prison sentence, she really does need to be committed to the psychiatric hospital for a proper evaluation, and a place that she may never be freed from.

Perhaps she was looking for a career change, looks like an arsonist may be her calling – I guess it’s one way of getting out of the cleaning, but seriously folks, she’s a threat to society and this must be addressed before she causes loss of life – or maybe it was just a house warming party!

Jersey’s Foreign Minister Hits Back

Jersey’s foreign affairs minister has hit back at excessive threats from France to cut off electricity to the island in a dispute over post Brexit fishing rites.

Ian Gorst, external relations minister for Channel Island, said it’s not the first threat that France has made over fisheries as he blamed confusion around the post-Brexit trade agreement for sparking the feud.

Ian Gorst said the argument boiled down to just 17 licences granted to French fishermen on Friday last week, which they feel restricted their historic rights to fish in the waters of Jersey, which lies only 14 miles from the French coast.

He said the fishermen have simply failed to provide enough data about their historic fishing routes, and that as soon as the data is presented the licence will be updated to allow them access.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme, he said that they respect the historic rights of French fishermen to fish in Jersey waters as they have been doing for centuries, but the trade deal, that Jersey didn’t negotiate, and nor did France, says that fishing vessels have to provide all of the evidence of the amount of fishing they’ve done in the last three years.

And that they could see that this was not the first threat that the French have made, either to Jersey or the United Kingdom since they were into this new deal and that it would seem disproportionate to cut off electricity for the sake of needing to provide additional details so that they could refine the licences, and it was said that the trade deal was clear that when fishermen provide the proof, they will provide the licences.

Simmering tensions between France and the United Kingdom over rights to fish in the Channel quickly bubbled over on Friday last week when post Brexit trading rules came into force around the island of Jersey.

The new rules mean that any large French fishing vessels that want to enter the waters will need a licence granted by Jersey’s government.

But fishermen complained the licences had been issued with conditions that they were previously unaware of and which had not been cleared with French authorities.

French regional officials spoke out about the issue at the weekend, before the French government got involved and ramped up the rhetoric.

Annick Girardin, the French seas minister, talked of retaliation measures contained within the trade deal, saying France was ready to use them if they had to, and she said that she would like to mention, that for example, of the transport of electricity by submarine cables, alluding to the possibility of cutting off the supply.

However, the French might do more good by focusing on what’s going on behind them. If Russia decides to push on, then the French might need our help once again.

International waters and maritime laws have been in place for centuries, it’s nothing new, so what’s the dilemma? But the French are in very big trouble with their economy and Macron is presently attempting to look good, and where do these French get all their time from to protest?

And there’s always such an overreaction from the French, and it’s so childish – go to your room and think about your behaviour! But then perhaps this is all about the vengeful French that will never change – France is like an ex-wife who can’t move on, and this is Brexit that just keeps on giving!

%d bloggers like this: