Alone Together As She Breathed Her Last…

Jimmy Carter spent the last moments of his wife Rosalyn Carter’s life the way they’d spent most of their 77-year marriage, together.

Jimmy Carter, 99, wheelchair-bound and in hospice care, asked his family to leave him for a few final moments alone with his darling wife, who passed away Sunday at their home in Georgia.

According to his son James E. Carter III, aka ‘Chip’, the family were initially together as his father, who has also been in hospice care, gave a final wish.

He said that his Dad told her that he loved her and thanked her for all the wonderful things she’d done. Then he asked them to leave so he could be alone with her.

From there, the Carters sat alone together, holding hands for at least a half hour.

The Carters were placed feet to feet at each other’s hospital beds Saturday night, so they could face one another and talk.

Unfortunately, when Rossalyn awoke Sunday morning, she could no longer talk and was pronounced dead at 2.10 pm.

Chip told a newspaper outlet that tears were coming out of his eyes.

He said that his father had told him several times over the last nine months that he had always thought he would outlive their mother and protect her until she passed, but that now he wasn’t sure that was going to happen, and that upset him, but he stayed alive and they all told him how proud they were of his relationship with her and of how he looked after her.

Jimmy Carter has continued to eat but has been quiet, finding it difficult to speak since his wife’s death.

Chip added that, depending on his health, his father plans to attend Rossalyn’s funeral next Wednesday.

His body has changed while being in care, so a new suit is being made just for the occasion.

Chip Carter added that every living First Lady was invited to the funeral, including Melania Trump.

He said that his mother was a gracious person and she would treat everybody with respect, including a former first lady.

President Joe Biden, Vice President Harris and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff are also scheduled to attend.

The longest-married couple in US presidential history, they met when Jimmy was just three years old and Rosalyn was a newborn. They celebrated their 77th wedding anniversary on July 7, 2023.

There’s nothing more beautiful than having a true life partner that brings out the best in you, and there’s no greater gift than to love and be loved. If only we could all learn from their incredible love and compassion for each other.

Such a beautiful couple. True soulmates in every sense of the word.

I’m not sure what kind of president Jimmy Carter was, a bit before my time, but I’m sure he was a kind, decent man who meant well.

I suspect he won’t be around much longer either, he will miss his wife and probably die of old age or of a broken heart, but they were two extremely fine people, humble and hardworking.

They both stood at that altar many decades ago and vowed their union would be ‘until death us do part’, and they meant every single syllable of it.

King Charles Profits From Dead Citizens’ Assets

King Charles has been accused of profiting from the dead as insiders claim his property empire is using their assets as ‘free money’ and a ‘slush fund’.

The monarch’s private estate the Duchy of Lancaster has long collected assets owned by the people who died in its jurisdiction without a will or next of kin in a feudal system known as ‘bona vacantia’.

In the past decade, it’s collected more than £60 million which, after costs, is said to be distributed to charities set up by the late Queen.

These include the Duchy of Lancaster Jubilee Trust, established in 2001, which supports the upkeep and preservation of heritage assets across the estate for the ‘public benefit’.

But internal duchy documents obtained by a newspaper outlet reportedly show how funds are increasingly being used to fund the renovation of properties that are rented out for profit.

The 2020 policy entitled SA9 states that funds can be used for the ‘public good’ to repair, preserve and protect duchy properties when they’re categorised as a ‘heritage asset’.

However, the definition goes beyond listed buildings and includes any that fall within different categories including those in conservation areas or a location of outstanding national beauty (AONB), or if they’re deemed to be of ‘local historical importance’ or of special scientific interest.

A newspaper analyst suggests the 2020 policy gave the duchy licence to spend bona vacantia on as much as half of its massive property portfolio.

Three sources familiar with the duchy’s expenditure confirmed to the newspaper outlet that the estate was using revenues amassed from the dead to renovate its huge property portfolio.

One said that duchy insiders regaled the bona vacantia funds as ‘free money’ and a ‘slush fund’.

Properties identified as suitable for funding include townhouses, holiday lets, rustic cottages, an old petrol station and barns, including one used to facilitate partridge shoots in Yorkshire.

One document refers to the renovation of an old farmhouse to help convert it into a high-end residential let while another project saw a farm building transformed into commercial offices.

In some instances, the funds have been spent to purchase log burners for properties owned by the King and rented out by his estate.

The practice is said to help make rental properties more profitable, and in turn, benefits the King, who in his first annual payout since inheriting the estate from the Queen received £26 million for the duchy.

Am I shocked, of course not. The nefarious tightfisted family are sitting on millions of pounds for turning up to smile and shake hands, and how some people support this mob is shocking.

The Royals have been doing things like this for an extremely long time – they really need the cash, don’t they? And if it’s going to charities to maintain his grounds rather than charities to help people, then it’s going into his pocket.

It’s all done to protect the Royal billions. Do they have no shame when it comes to unearned income? They’ll take every penny.

The money is going to refurbishing private lettings rented out for profit, and maintaining venues used exclusively by the King for his jollies and as a slush fund, and we are the unsuspecting suckers, they must be chuckling their heads off, and yet they’re always screaming poverty.

Sucking money out of dead people, do they have no shame? Of course not, they’re greedy beyond belief.

This is just phenomenal greed, and it was said that the SA9 was introduced in 2020. Fancy that, this Government slipping in a rule change when everyone was looking elsewhere. Who would have thought?

Smokers Are Being Hammered By Jeremy Hunt

The price of rolling tobacco will soar as Jeremy Hunt hammered smokers with huge tax rises in his Autumn Statement.

Announcing his latest financial package to the House of Commons, the Chancellor told MPs he would massively increase the duty on hand-rolling tobacco.

This will rise by an additional 10 per cent above the tobacco duty escalator.

There was also no relief for those who smoke manufactured cigarettes, with the duty rates on all tobacco products increased by Jeremy Hunt.

According to Treasury figures, the duty rises will see an additional £2.21 added to a 30g packet of hand-rolling tobacco.

There will also be an additional 66p added to a pack of 20 cigarettes and an additional 33p per 10g of cigars.

The tobacco duty escalator increases duty at the RPI rate of inflation + 2 per cent.

It means the cost of hand-rolling tobacco is being hiked by the rate of inflation plus 12 per cent.

The RPI rate of inflation was 6.1 per cent last month.

It’s estimated the move will rake in an additional £40 million for the Treasury next year.

The Treasury move comes as the Government bids to lower the gap in the price of hand-rolling tobacco and packs of cigarettes.

Simon Clark, director of the smokers’ group Forest, said that the Chancellor has just raised two fingers to working-class people across the country.

He said that increasing duty on hand-rolled tobacco by such a punitive amount was going to push more smokers further into poverty or into the hands of illegal traders including criminal gangs.

He said this was a clear attack on smokers from poorer backgrounds, many of whom use hand-rolled tobacco because until now it’s been cheaper than buying manufactured cigarettes, and that instead of penalising adults who smoke with punitive taxation designed to force them to quit, the Government should focus on the underlying reasons why a greater proportion of people from lower socio-economic backgrounds were smokers.

He added that it was often because of their environment, but instead of improving the conditions in which many people live, this Tory Government was determined to force smokers to give up a habit that may relieve some of the stress caused by their environment.

This move by the Chancellor is the second-largest hike in the cost of hand-rolling tobacco this year.

At his Spring Budget in March, Jeremy Hunt announced hand rolling tobacco would increase by 16.1 per cent.

This is an extremely lucrative taxation. They also know that the taxation will put plenty of money into their coffers, and they seem to be laughing all the way to the bank because they also know that it would be very difficult for people to give up smoking, especially those who have smoked most of their lives.

Smokers are now treated as second-class citizens, but drinking is way more damaging to public health.

People smoke or drink because of the pressures of everyday life. Both have increased risks to our health, and as adults we make an informed choice because everyone needs something in these ominous times, it’s either drinking, smoking or junk food, and it’s all about weighing up the risks and accepting the possible consequences.

The tax from cigarettes more than pays for the upkeep of everyone in our Government, and even some smokers die of unrelated causes, and if everyone gave up smoking then the Government and the NHS would have to find something else they could moan to us about.

In fact, cannabis is now cheaper than cigarettes!

The Government can tax tobacco all they want, but there will always be hookey shops and people around who will sell it way cheaper and smuggle it in.

Is Covent Garden’s Street Performer’s Era Coming To An End? 

Covent Garden’s iconic street performers fear they could be turfed out of London’s shopping hub by Christmas as part of a council plan to decrease noise.

Westminster Council first attempted to clamp down on certain public performances with a fee-based licencing system in April 2021.

This included limiting a performer’s space to just five metres, placing a total prohibition on any sound amplification in some places and disallowing the use of any perceived ‘dangerous props’.

According to the Covent Garden Street Performers (CGSPA) association, such regulations made it all but impossible for anyone but the live statues to continue performing. Its members outright rejected its introduction and willingly criminalised themselves by continuing their performances as usual.

Next month, the council will discuss whether to finance further enforcement measures to address the crackdown, including a proposed alliance with the police.

One of the affected entertainers is Chris Thomas, 31, a circus performer from Hackney.

He told a newspaper outlet that it was absolutely shocking really, wasn’t it and that this had been running longer than he had lived.

He said that he truly believed that a lot of the people that visit Covent Garden come and visit this pitch to watch street performers and for that to be removed would kill the essence of what Covent Garden really was.

He added that it wasn’t something he was prepared to live with, and they were going to pursue the resistance to keep the pitch running, and that there was a very strong community of performers, and they were going to do everything they could to keep the place alive.

Mike Juggles, 27, is an axe juggling performer and said greater enforcement of the licence would leave him completely unable to perform.

He said that it was a shame and that they were managing themselves very well making sure that everybody was following safety measures, not being too loud, and not being rude to the audience, they even said that they wouldn’t perform past 9 pm.

He explained that the local street performers often raise money for charity and take care of their community.

Street performing in the famous shopping hub is part of a tradition going back hundreds of years to 1662 when Samuel Pepys’ wrote in his diary about a marionette show featuring a puppet called ‘Punch’, who would later become one-half of the fighting duo ‘Punch and Judy’.

Do you ever notice that government councils don’t want us to have nice things?

Two decades ago London was a place for inventive minds and free spirits. Artists, musicians et cetera. Now, it’s either immigrants, criminals or boring corporate commuters. London has lost all of its edginess, and it’s a city in decline. More and more of our culture and heritage will be muted or destroyed, and meanwhile, knife crime continues to go unpunished.

Half the fun of going to Covent Garden is to see the street performers, and during the summer months, it’s actually very interesting to watch these performances, and can be the highlight of ones day trip.

It seems like having fun is a bad thing these days. However, it’s not hard to see why our councils want to end this part of our English culture and history. I bet if the performers were doing a rap and bang rah they would be letting people celebrate in Covent Garden all they want. Looks like it’s another step nearer to a prayer mat!

I suppose this is one way to eradicate the charm of Covent Garden. Soon London will have nothing to entice visitors.

There will be more and more restrictions, I can guarantee that and eventually, it will become a Nanny state. We’re not quite there yet, but watch this space!

‘Flash Rob’ Mob Of Up To 17 Teens Ransacks Nike Store In LA 

A throng of teenagers stole $12,000 worth of goods from a Los Angeles Nike store in a ‘flash rob mob’ that was captured on video.

Shortly before 6 pm, over a dozen robbers bombarded the Nike Community Store on South Alameda Street.

Footage shows them loading garbage sacks with boxes of sneakers and rushing about the store, their arms brimming with clothes, as customers look on hopelessly.

Several of the teens hide their faces behind black masks. One is wearing a pair of yellow gloves.

The LAPD singled out 17 suspects. One was identified by their ‘distinct’ sweatshirt featuring an emblem of a bonsai tree and the words ‘Ritual of the Spirit’.

A police press release describes the suspects as ‘four females and 13 males, Black, varying in age from 15 to 20 years old.

The teens escaped in five vehicles including a tan Infiniti four-door, a grey KIA SUV, a white Honda, a KIA four-door and a black Audi.

According to the Public Policy Institute of California, Los Angeles County currently has the highest commercial robbery rate in the state.

In 2022, the state saw a 28.7 per cent jump from the low rates of the pandemic years.

While the shoplifting rate stays below pre-pandemic levels, this doesn’t account for other types of retail theft like commercial burglary.

After seeing a 5.8 per cent increase last year, the rate for this kind of theft is 15.7 per cent higher than in 2019.

This figure includes lost product costs, increased insurance costs, raised price of goods and unrealised wages.

Law enforcement has embarked on a statewide crackdown on organised retail robbery, which is expected to cost the state over $19 billion this year.

Just this week, the California Highway Patrol’s Organised Retail Theft Task Force reported the results of a huge crackdown spanning several counties.

The sting meted out 137 arrests as well as the recovery of three looted vehicles and more than $60,000 in goods.

Governor Gavin Newsom said in August that the state would be tripling CHP resources in the Los Angeles area to fight retail crime.

He said in a press release that the CHP was the proven leader in tackling organised retail theft and through this expanded partnership the agency would further assist the city in doing its job to keep Angelenos and their business safe.

Stores will ultimately be a thing of the past with stores going online for their sales. More and more shops are shutting down and going online these days, at least that way they can’t have their goods looted. However, this is more evidence of society’s moral decline.

Even if these people are caught, the prosecutors and judges will just give them a hug and let them walk free with no penalty, but this should be treated like an organised crime.

All shops should have automated gates that come down that prevent the looters from leaving before this behaviour rests its ugly head.

In A Bid To Fill Teaching Shortages, Lancashire Council Is Giving Priority To The Children Of Teachers

Parents and Sir Lindsay Hoyle have slammed Lancashire council’s ‘divisive’ plan to fill teaching shortages by giving school places to the children of potential teachers.

Sir Lindsay Hoyle, who’s Speaker of the House of Commons and MP for Chorley, attacked the Tory-run council for its plan, accusing the authority of failing to provide more school places.

Lancashire County Council leaders are set to carry out a public consultation over how it assigns places to students when a school is oversubscribed.

The idea is that it would help recruit and retain teachers, with thousands going on strike in recent months over pay, and others exiting the profession entirely.

As well as the children of staff, education chiefs are also looking at a level of priority being given to the children of armed forces personnel.

Labour MP Sir Lindsay told a newspaper outlet that any form of selection criteria set by Lancaster County Council will cause division within communities and leave numerous parents with a feeling of injustice at the way in which school children are selected.

He said that the root cause of problems in many parts of Lancashire, including his constituency of Chorley, was the lack of school places. The education authority Lancashire County Council had not taken action soon enough to plan for population increases.

Parents in Blackburn told a newspaper outlet it was unfair that children living outside the catchment area were being given favourable treatment over those who lived just minutes away.

Natalie Conway, 44, a student nurse, said that she thought the proposals were very unfair and that priority shouldn’t be given to those who work at the school.

She said that she’s a student nurse and if any of her family turned up at A&E requiring treatment, should they be seen first just because she works there? Of course not. It should be the same for school admissions.

Ami Alex, 25, a singer and street performer, said that she thought it was a really bad idea and did not believe that any child should be given priority over another.

She said that everyone should be treated equally and that she thought it was a silly idea.

Louise Delve, 55, said it was penalising other children. What if a child already had a sibling at the school and they miss out on a place because it’s given to a staff member’s child? Their parents would then have to do four school runs a day.

This is straight out of a communist playbook, education for the privileged only, but then it’s supply and demand. In an ideal world, this would be unnecessary but there’s now a lack of teachers.

I’m actually surprised there’s any available place at any of the schools as we’re getting overrun at the moment and I don’t see any new schools being built at the moment either.

It’s actually disgraceful that it’s come to this because all British-born children should have equal opportunities when it comes to education needs, but then I guess they’ve got to do something to entice enough teachers to the job.

The idea is that we help recruit and retain teachers, especially with thousands going on strike in recent months over pay, and others leaving the profession altogether.

Perhaps Rishi Sunak could find a way to reduce the number of children and their families coming into this country until public services can cope with the demand.

There is no end to these stories about inept councils, but remember that these councils are staffed by people who are essentially missing a brain.

Green Initiatives Are Being Implemented In Oxford

Oxford City Council are going to prohibit gas hobs and boilers in new homes from 2025 in a bid to become more environmentally friendly.

The city is planning to hit zero by 2024 and says this move will help tackle the ‘existential threat of climate change’.

The proposals state that appliances that use fossil fuels for heating and cooking are to be prohibited from being installed in new homes, with very limited exceptions.

Oxford’s Labour Council also wants to bring forward their 2036 ban on gas and oil in new builds.

However, the Home Builders Federation (HBF) has criticised Oxford councillors for diverging from the national timetable to meet net zero by 2050.

Steve Turner, executive director at the HBF, told a newspaper outlet that they need all parties, including central and local government to work together and avoid diverging from the developing plan, which would lead to unnecessary delays and additional costs.

Steve Turner added that the industry was committed to the government’s plan and was working with stakeholders to deliver it.

In September, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak pushed back green targets, such as the ban on new petrol and diesel car sales by five years to 2035.

About a fifth of all households will be covered by an ‘exemption’ from ever having to remove their gas boilers and replace them with a heat pump.

Rishi Sunak also said he was scrapping ‘heavy-handed’ measures including an increase in recycling that could see each home have seven bins, and taxes on meat and flying, and new rules on car-sharing journeys, though critics had already questioned whether they would ever be introduced.

The Prime Minister insisted his delay on net zero policies was not a ‘short-term decision’ aimed at winning the next general election.

Whilst there’s no set-out ban on gas hobs in the United Kingdom, an increasing amount of new homes will not be connected to the UK’s gas grid.

A report also found that gas cookers can fill a kitchen with air pollution that breaks recommended safe levels.

Researchers rigged monitoring equipment in more than 280 homes, 40 in the United Kingdom, as well as in France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania and Slovakia.

More than half of homes using gas hobs and gas ovens in the experiment breached the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended maximum level of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) once a week.

Perhaps all those smart people in Oxford ought to do some research because banning gas hobs will have very little impact, and this looks like garbage science. Burning gas begets CO2 and water. Hobs are on for a brief period of time, and there’s very little probability of any health risks from gas hobs.

Perhaps we should tell them that council offices often leave their lights on when nobody is working and sometimes the heating gets left on as well. It appears that it’s one rule for them and another for us.

Not only that, we are permitting governments to tell us what we can have in our own private homes. Next, they’ll be telling us that we can’t breathe the air.

Unfortunately, science has become a religion when it comes to climate research, and anyone who doesn’t align with climate change is shunned.

It’s about time common sense was brought to politics. Climate change is happening, but it’s not man-made, it’s the natural cycle of the earth because nothing stays the same. It just can’t, and in the scheme of things it’s going to make absolutely no difference!

A New Welfare Clampdown Will Force Housebound And Mentally Ill People To Work From Home 

People housebound with physical and mental conditions will be told to look for employment they can do from home or face having their benefits cut under hardline welfare reforms.

Under plans to be unveiled by Rishi Sunak, they will be told that being unable to leave home is no obstacle to finding work, thanks to modern technology.

A newspaper reported that new claimants from 2025 could lose handouts worth up to £4,680 a year because they can no longer be written off as unable to work.

It’s expected to form part of a ‘carrot and stick’ approach to welfare, with Tory sources saying that Rishi Sunak had backed away from a reduction on overall benefits, saying the emphasis would be on ‘reform, not cuts’.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has examined whether to break with convention and increase benefits by less than the 6.7 per cent inflation figure recorded in September.

Under one plan, benefits would have been ‘uprated’ next year by the lower October inflation figure of 4.6 per cent, saving the Treasury about £2 billion.

However, a source said that the full rise had now been considered ‘affordable’ after better-than-expected projections from the Office for Budget Responsibility were delivered on Friday.

The State Pension is also now likely to be increased in line with the triple lock, the commitment to increase State Pensions by the highest out of average earnings growth, inflation or 2.5 per cent, meaning an 8.5 per cent increase.

In a major address yesterday, Rishi Sunak indicated that the Government would look for savings instead of taking steps to drive down the number of people claiming unemployment benefits.

The carrot and stick package will include additional support and training for those wanting a job, coupled with more stringent sanctions for those who refuse to look for work, who could have their benefits stopped entirely.

The Prime Minister said that getting people off welfare and into work would allow the Government to continue to deliver a ‘generous safety net’ for those who can’t work. Rishi Sunak said that ‘work, not welfare, was the best route out of poverty’.

He added that right now, around two million people of working age were not working at all and that this was a national scandal and an enormous waste of human potential.

He said that we must do more to support those who can work to do so, and they would clamp down on welfare fraudsters because the system must be fair for the taxpayers who fund it.

This is a total cop-out by our government which is still letting boat people into our country with no deterrant.

It’s a money-making scheme for the Tories, and they’re not going to end it whilst they’re making money from it, and thanks to our government boats have been arriving in their masses under Rishi Sunak and Boris, who put them in 4-star hotels, and what does Rishi Sunak suggest these people do from home?

Obviously, there are people out there who will never be able to work, but there are some people out there who haven’t worked a day in their life and are simply slothful and can’t be bothered to find work, but can you blame them? They realise that working will not benefit them in the long run, because what are they actually working for? They will eventually get old, be put into a care home, have their money taken from them and live in a small room, mainly in seclusion. Wow, that was worth working for!

We should be shipping illegals back to their own country, we would save millions, if not billions of pounds, but the Government won’t do that because they need their vote.

Perhaps we should send the MPs away as well to remove our National Debt because they hide behind our immigration to take the spotlight off their ineptitude and deceit.

Julian Assange, The Founder Of WikiLeaks

Most people would have forgotten who Julian Assange is. He was the gentleman who founded WikiLeaks and who now sits in prison – a political prisoner, being held at Our Majesty’s pleasure on behalf of an embarrassed foreign sovereign.

He came to wide international attention in 2010 when WikiLeaks published a string of leaks from US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning – footage of a US airstrike in Baghdad, US military logs from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and US diplomatic cables.

A diplomatic cable, also known as a diplomatic telegram (DipTel) or embassy cable, is a confidential text-based message exchange between a diplomatic mission, like an embassy or a consulate, and the foreign ministry of its parent country. A diplomatic cable is a type of dispatch. Other dispatches may be sent as a physical document in a diplomatic bag.

Julian Assange was raised in several towns in Australia until his family settled in Melbourne in his mid-teens. He became involved in the hacker community and was convicted of hacking in 1996.

Following the establishment of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange was its editor when it published the Bank Julius Baer documents, footage of the 2008 Tibetan unrest, and a report on political killings in Kenya with The Sunday Times.

In November 2020, Sweden issued a European arrest warrant for Julian Assange, for questioning in a Swedish investigation. After losing his appeal against the warrant, he breached bail and took sanctuary in the Embassy of Ecuador in London in June 2012.

He was granted asylum by Ecuador in August 2012 on the grounds of political persecution and fears he might be deported to the United States. He stood for the Australian Senate in 2013 and launched the WikiLeaks Party but failed to win a seat. Swedish prosecutors dropped the investigation in 2019.

On 11 April 2019, Julian Assange’s asylum was withdrawn following a series of disputes with Ecuadorian authorities. The police were invited into the embassy and he was arrested. He was found guilty of breaching the Bail Act and condemned to 50 weeks in jail.

The US government unsealed an indictment charging Julian Assange with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion related to the leaks provided by Chelsea Manning. In May 2019 and June 2020, the US government unsealed new indictments against Julian Assange, charging him with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and alleging he had conspired with hackers.

Julian Assange has been detained in HM Prison Belmarsh in London since April 2019, as the United States government’s extradition effort is contested in the British courts.

The mother of Julian Assange has since spoken of the unending, gut-wrenching pain she’s been suffering. She also said that the WikiLeaks founder was being cruelly psychologically tortured by the authorities and said that she feared he would be imprisoned for the rest of his life.

Julian Assange, 52, is wanted in America over an alleged conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information following WikiLeaks’ publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2010 and 2011.

Julian Assange might be in prison, but shouldn’t we the public keep raising our voices to our politicians till it’s all they can hear? After all, Julian’s life is in their hands.

Julian Assange’s fiancee accused the UK authorities of playing the role of executioner after he suffered a mini-stroke in jail.

Stella Moris, 38, said he was left with a drooping right eyelid, memory problems and indications of neurological impairment after the stroke.

She said that his confinement was having a disastrous effect on his health.

If the Americans get hold of him he will never feel fresh air on his face again. To sum it up we live in a Western unlawful cruel regime which outlaws press freedom and human rights, and this is what happens when people go up against the elite and expose the truth. We now live in a future where people will be imprisoned for speaking up or standing up – isn’t it a wonderful world we now live in, NOT!

Regardless of whether you like Julian Assange or not, or his methods, we have to stand up for what we believe in, otherwise, it’s 1984, full stop!

It’s about time that the US took some responsibility for their own actions instead of persecuting others for telling us about it. I mean, what other atrocities have they kept concealed from us? I bet there’s an abundance of them.

I’m sure that there will be plenty of extremely patriotic people out there saying that Julian had what was coming for him, but what did he really do wrong? I personally believe he didn’t do anything wrong, but he’s still being politically persecuted for exposing the crimes of the political elite.

The man didn’t kill anyone for goodness sake, he just exposed the illegal horrors perpetrated by the US federal government and others.

Does this also mean that anyone who exposes the barbaric behaviour of the so-called Western democracy should be banged up for life? It’s all about telling the truth to the people, but instead, they all sit on their hiney behind closed doors devising their next adventure on human life, and why shoot the messenger while all those real traitors roam free?

However, there are fools out there calling for him to be locked up indefinitely or sent to the US. Julian Assange was just a person who demonstrated crimes by the government – the sheep should go back to sleep or watch Love Island instead, but let’s face it, British politicians have always bent over for the US – there must be a few sore arses out there!

Free the guy now. It’s old news and what do they say ‘The truth will set you free!’.

XL Bully Owner Wearing Bright Green Top With ‘Friendly’ On It Confronts Busybody Cyclist Who Claims Her Pet Is Dangerous 

This is the moment the owner of a Bully XL confronted a busybody biker who called her loyal pup ‘dangerous’ before then backpedalling and saying he was ‘wrong’.

Amanda Holloway was walking her beloved 12-month-old pet Hulk, who was sporting a bright green jacket with ‘friendly’ on it when she encountered a male cyclist who said he should be wearing a muzzle.

His comments come amid fears over the soon-to-be-banned Bully XL dogs, who have mauled adults and children to death in a string of bloody attacks across the United Kingdom.

Mrs Holloway, whose animal’s breed is soon set to be banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act after a series of fatal incidents, caught the argument on camera as she strolled in Bushy Park, Richmond, west London.

Posting the video on Facebook, the mother of three wrote, so this is the beginning of my walk with the altercation with the biker as you can see he isn’t bothered by people or dogs, he just wants to go on his walk with his mumma and his ball.

The clip shows Hulk sitting on the path waiting for his ball to be thrown, as other people and pets strolled past him. Seconds later, a cyclist was heard saying, ‘That dog should have a muzzle on it’.

‘No he shouldn’t actually,’ said owner Mrs Holloway, who is a stay-at-home mother.

‘It’s the “Powerful Dogs Act”, why shouldn’t it? ‘ retorts the cyclist, in relation to the Dangerous Dogs Act, which from December 31 will make it illegal to have an American XL Bully in public without a lead or muzzle.

‘Because he is absolutely friendly and the law isn’t until December 31, so educate yourself,’ Mrs Holloway answers. Speaking of the muzzle, she continues: ‘Why does he need one? He hasn’t attacked anyone in all his life.’

‘Yeah but it’s the Powerful Dogs Act,’ the cyclist responds.

‘And I have complete control over him, absolute control. It’s the owner, not the dog. So unless you own one, keep your opinions to yourself.’ she adds, as she turns back to her Hulk, who is waiting patiently by the park gate.

Telling her dog to ‘sit’, she gloats: ‘Oh look, a “dangerous dog” sitting and waiting for the gate to be opened. So dangerous, isn’t he?’

All dogs are friendly up until the point they attack someone. However, we should be looking at the owners that buy or breed these dogs, for not every large canine is dangerous unless the buyer or breeder has them for the purpose of fighting or attacking.

Dogs that are bought for the purpose of being a guard dog should be behind a closed door or muzzled, but then it wouldn’t be a guard dog, would it?

In her opinion the dog was safe and he was friendly. However, it’s a dog and I grant you, not every dog will attack, but there’s always that chance that it could because it’s part of their instinct to do so.

All dogs out in public should be on a short lead regardless of their breed or how friendly they are because not every person wants a dog running up to them, although I’m a sucker for anything that’s canine.

She said that her dog was friendly and it probably is, but all breeds have the instinct to harm if they’re in a situation where they feel threatened and large dogs are capable of doing just that.

However, we have some men like that as well, right? Should we muzzle all men or put them down because they could be dangerous?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started