The Fight To Keep Pizza Hut Open Has Begun

Pizza Hut faces a debt problem as people spend less on dining out due to the cost-of-living crisis while it wrestles with substantial rises in energy and food prices.

Auditors have raised fears over whether the beloved family restaurant can continue trading, while experts claimed similar debt problems are hitting other similar chains.

The US firm’s biggest British franchise, which employs 4,000 employees across 152 outlets, must repay £31 million of its £73 million of debts by April next year.

Now, it is attempting to get revised terms on debt and acknowledged it could breach its banking covenants later this year in a ‘severe but plausible downside scenario’.

But bosses at Pizza Hut UK – which is the dining franchise and does not include the delivery or takeaway arms – have denied the chain is in danger and insisted ‘constructive’ refinancing discussions are anticipated to be concluded by the end of this year.

It comes amid continuing fears for the fate of UK high streets, with the British Retail Consortium revealing last month that 6,000 shops have closed in the last five years and the overall vacancy rate has increased since the beginning of the year.

Sophie Lund-Yates, lead equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said Pizza Hut UK outlets had also been affected by their locations in shopping centres or near offices.

She told a newspaper outlet that Pizza Hut is in a very difficult position and that the cost of living crisis has heaped a huge amount of pressure on restaurant chains, especially those who’ve taken on an onerous amount of debt.

She said that unfortunately, it’s increasingly looking like Pizza Hut is within this camp and is the latest victim in the cohort of companies that are being stung by higher interest rates, which makes repayments on fat loans a painful reality.

Pizza Hut restaurants are also frequently located in shopping centres or near offices, which are areas that have seen footfall decline since the pandemic, which when coupled with the fact that consumers have less money in their pocket, creates a potent and challenging problem even more difficult.

The facts surrounding the Pizza Hut developments are rather thin on the ground, as is something that will definitely be observed closely by fans of the chain.

Pizza Hut UK is being charged interest on its debt of up to 14 per cent and has posted an operating loss for the past two years, including £16.5 million last year.

Unfortunately, Pizza Hut is extremely costly. Their prices are not reasonable at all. If they didn’t charge so much for their Pizza’s because they’re greedy they might not be in so much trouble now. The quality isn’t too bad, but at the end of the day it’s junk food, and there are numerous other places that are much better for less.

Remember it’s just a pile of dough that you’re eating, along with perhaps a drink and a dessert and that it’s going to come to about £30 or more, and don’t forget you have to add the delivery fee as well.

They’re way overpriced and in some places, they won’t accept cash. I mean, who’s going to miss that? Pizza Hut is way overpriced and has been since it opened, but the cost of living crisis has definitely not helped these businesses and other smaller takeaways as well, and soon they will be a thing of the past, and then everyone will have to cook at home, instead of taking the easy way out and just ordering online.

Pizza is so inexpensive to make at home, and even with decent quality toppings, it’s still more affordable to make it at home. The problem is, there are a lot of youngsters these days who simply don’t know how to cook.

As ULEZ Expansion Comes Into Force, Sadiq Khan Ignores Fury Of Londoners

Sadiq Khan dismissed outrage from Londoners and increased Labour alarm today as the ULEZ expansion came into force.

In a bruising round of discussions this morning, the mayor denied that expanding the ultra-low emission zone across the capital was an ‘anti car’ money-raising exercise.

He shrugged off fears from allies of Sir Keir Starmer about the political consequences of imposing the £12.50 a day levy so widely, insisting people want to see their leaders taking aggressive action.

But Sadiq Khan did attempt to suppress a fresh row by denying that he would bring in a pay-per-mile scheme for motorists during his time at City Hall, despite the emergence of documents revealing it has been considered.

Transport Secretary Mark Harper said he would have blocked the ULEZ plan if he had the power.

The bulk of Greater London is covered by the £12.50 a day levy from today.

It hits petrol vehicles introduced before 2005 that are not compliant with Euro 4 emissions regulations.

Meanwhile, diesel cars and vans are only exempt if their engine complies with more recent Euro 6 rules, which were introduced in September 2015.

This will snare popular vans registered before the cut-off date including Ford Transit Custom 310s.

Sir Keir Starmer has been attempting to estrange himself from the policy since it was blamed for Labour’s failure to win the Uxbridge & South Ruislip by-election, triggered by Boris Johnson’s resignation from the Commons.

Senior Labour figures fear that outrage at the policy could cost the party key outer London seats in the general election next year.

But Sadiq Khan told Times Radio that the policy to clean the air in London was not anti-car or anti-motorist.

He said that the good news was actually that nine out of 10 cars seen driving in outer London on an average day were already compliant, so there was no additional fee for them to pay, no restrictions on them, yet they could benefit from the clean air.

He also said that he accepted that there were a small number of cars that would be affected, they’re non-compliant cars, and that they themselves, the drivers, breathe in pollutants, and that’s why he’s announced that every single driver in London of a car or motorbike, every small business with a van, every charity with a minibus, will receive financial support (for scrapping non-compliant vehicles).

Sadiq Khan is targeting the poorest in society, and he knows precisely what he’s doing. He’s not really telling us the truth because how can paying £12.50 a day improve air quality if old cars are still on the roads?

ULEZ zones are spreading like cancer, and are we actually supposed to accept this foolery that they’re for ‘cleaner air’?

Sadiq Khan has spent billions on something that will be made redundant eventually because of the Government’s own electric car agenda.

Don’t be deceived, these cameras are for the next phase which is pay per mile, and this is also a way to remove all your freedoms once and for all.

Surely, Sadiq Khan shouldn’t have the right to do this, especially without proper consultation from the public, and I really can’t see any justification to do this. I also can’t see any justification for having a Mayor, what’s the point?

If Sadiq Khan was actually that worried about air quality, then why not take old cars off the roads and replace them with electric vehicles? Yes, that’s right, REPLACE, not sell them to people.

At Least 500 UK Flights Were Cancelled By Air Traffic Chaos

As many as 80 per cent of flights leaving the United Kingdom were postponed following a massive failure of the national air traffic control system, causing confusion for tens of thousands of holidaymakers on one of the busiest days of the year. 

Britain’s National Air Traffic Services (NATS) said it was experiencing technical issues that had forced controllers to switch from an automatic system for landing and dispatching flights to a manual one.

They said that flight plans were being input manually which meant that they couldn’t process them at the same volume, hence they had to apply traffic flow restrictions, and a spokesman told a newspaper outlet that there was nothing to suggest a cyber attack.

The majority (78 per cent) of flights leaving Heathrow are presently delayed according to Flight Radar data from 1.45 pm, compared to 74 per cent at Gatwick, 81 per cent at Manchester and 86 per cent at Bristol.

According to an analysis carried out by Cirium, 232 flights have been cancelled departing UK airports so far, equivalent to around 8 per cent of all departures.

Meanwhile, 271 flights have been cancelled coming into UK airports so far, equivalent to about 9 per cent of all arrivals.

Britons returning from Tenerife told a newspaper outlet they’d been told to expect a wait of at least 12 hours.

Michele Robson, who used to work in air traffic control, said that it was unusual for failures to last this long. As a result, nobody really knows at this point how long it’s going to take.

Travel expert Simon Calder said the issue would cause misery but added that holidaymakers should assume their flight was operating normally unless they were told otherwise.

Contagion from the issue has already dispersed across Europe, causing delays for some flights departing the Continent for the USA.

TV presenter Gabby Logan said she’s been left stranded on the runway at Budapest Airport while returning from the World Athletics Championships. She wrote that after almost 3 weeks away from home she was hours from hugging her family, and had been told that UK airspace was shut and that they could be there for 12 hours and that they had to sit on the plane and wait.

NATS didn’t supply any additional details about what had caused it or how long it would take for UK airspace to return to normal.

The more I read these reports, the more I wonder about people, particularly ones with children, dragging them off abroad to all kinds of harsh travel. Why doesn’t everybody holiday at home in the United Kingdom? Then they can put some money back into the economy and appreciate the beauty that’s all over our own country.

Next, they’ll be telling you that digital ID, passports and a cashless society are the answer, but clearly, it’s not.

Prince Philip Was Startled When He Saw Servants Arrive To Take Care Of Just One Guest – Him! – His Horror Was Overwhelming

It’s by no means unusual for a new broom to sweep away the excesses of the past or attempt to, and King Charles isn’t the first senior figure to voice concern at the size and complexity of the Royal Household.

Prince Philip was definitely aware of how many people it took to run the larger royal residences and said so.

There was a time when Prince Philip had a few days free and thought it would be a good idea to spend them at Sandringham. He hadn’t even settled in when he looked out of the window and observed a busload of staff arriving, from telephonists to cooks, all needed to run the Big House for the few days he would be there.

He was horrified. Fortunately, Wood Farm became vacant shortly thereafter. (This was the house where Prince John, uncle to the late Queen’s father, George VI, had lived until his demise in 1919).

It was much smaller and could be run with a skeleton staff. So, from then on, that’s where he and the Queen tended to visit, except when they opened Sandringham House for family parties at Christmas or in the summer.

Wood Farm is where Prince Philip lived in retirement between 2017 and 2020.

However frustrated he might have been with the extensive entourage, and perhaps, the flummery involved, Prince Philip was not the monarch. Now his son Charles is flexing his muscles and no doubt change will soon ensue.

According to a newspaper outlet, the King is fed up with hearing ‘this is how it was done in the Queen’s reign’.

He’s identified that sometimes the same job is done repeatedly when it only needs to be done once and that if a maid attends to a room, should her work really be checked by three others?

It’s suggested that the King intends to tighten the ship, decrease the number of those employed and instead pay fewer people better wages.

It’s more than understandable that Queen Elizabeth II ran things in her own particular way and equally understandable that the King will wish to do some reorganising.

Quite rightly the Queen ran her household along established lines and no one could possibly accuse her of being personally extravagant. She was significantly different from the Queen Mother who ran her court in an extravagantly Edwardian way.

I’m not suggesting that we should cut the Royal Household to the bone, but if they want all that staff they should at least pay for it out of their own money because they should pay their own way for some things. The rest of the country has to pay for everything out of their own money, so why shouldn’t they?

Like it or not though, they do bring a lot of revenue to this country through tourism.

However, is this the same Prince Philip, who acquired such immense wealth during his marriage, that the terms of his will were not open to the public? Is this the same Prince Philip who whined about a lack of funds and a fear that he might have to sell his polo ponies?

Is this the same Prince Philip who insisted on receiving a taxpayer-funded allowance while married to the Queen? The same Prince Philip who didn’t think that his family should be paying inheritance tax or income tax and only under duress came to a voluntary agreement for the payment of income tax?

Yes, that’s him, the same one.

A Family Of Eight Forced To Live In A One-Bed Council Flat

A family of eight, including seven children all under the age of 16, have been forced to live in a cramped one-bed council flat.

Cheryl Shaw and her six children have been living in the mould and damp-ridden property in Oldham, Greater Manchester, since last year. The property was originally given to her when she was pregnant with her youngest child, Laila, who’s now two years old.

It was intended for just them, but due to circumstances beyond her control, last year Cheryl had to take in her other six children.

A newspaper outlet reported that each morning, Cheryl Shaw wakes up and clears her living room floor of the makeshift bed that she and three of her children are forced to sleep on so they can use the little space there is to play.

Behind the sofa is used as storage space for clothes because there’s nowhere else for it to go, and despite lodging multiple complaints about the cramped and mouldy conditions, Cheryl said that she’s never had anybody come out to see the flat.

Now Cheryl is at breaking point, fearing for the safety of her children and has been pleading with Oldham Council for more space.

Cheryl claims both she and her social worker have begged Oldham Council and First Choice Homes (FCHO), who manage the property, for more suitable accommodation, but their pleas have been denied.

She said that she’s trying to fight and that she’s doing everything everybody asks of her, but that her children can’t sleep properly and the situation is awful.

Then the council told the M.E.N that no five-bed socially rented properties have been available in the area since July 2021. Cheryl claims she’s been advised to move further out of Manchester for a better chance of successfully bidding on a bigger flat, but that would mean she would have to upheaval her children’s schooling because they would have to change schools, and would interrupt their education.

She also feels that moving away from her family and support network would be setting her up to fail.

She said that even if they gave her a three-bedroom she could make it work and that she just wants them to give her a property suitable for her and her children.

This mother is presently paying £389 per month for a mouldy property which is rented out to her by her council. They have a duty of care to put the property right, and if they can’t do this, then they should be rehousing her. They are refusing to do anything and therefore have failed their duty of care.

Cheryl continued that the children have always got coughs and colds and that the dampness worries her. That it’s just horrible and that she has to have clothes around the back of her settee because she doesn’t have anywhere else to put them, and that First Choice Homes knows all about the mould.

A social landlord is a housing association or council that provides social housing in the United Kingdom. They have a duty to keep the property in a good state of repair as well as an ongoing responsibility for the tenant’s welfare.

The Defective Premises Act 1972 says that your landlord owes you a certain duty of care that is set out in this Act. They include a duty to prevent personal injury or damage to the property caused by defects in your home. This duty is owed to anyone, members of your family, and also visitors to your home.

As a landlord, they must keep your rented property safe and free from health hazards.

So, what is considered an uninhabitable living situation for a tenant in the United Kingdom? A property is unfit for human occupancy if living there could cause you or anyone else in your household serious harm, for example, issues with dampness.

It’s true, we do have a serious problem with overcrowding, due to there being not enough housing stock and this isn’t just in Greater Manchester, it’s going on all over the country.

This problem is getting absurd, but councils are happy enough to have hotels closed down for illegals coming into the United Kingdom, but not our own who were born and bred here, and the situation is appalling.

Building more homes appears to be a concern as well because there are not enough places to build them and so they’re being built on every piece of green land we have, so the United Kingdom is becoming a concrete jungle.

Prefab housing was a wonderful idea after World War II. It would allow many British people the housing that they needed, and they could be built to house however big the family was, but again we have to have the space to put them.

There are numerous golf courses that we probably don’t need. It’s excellent for the golfers but needs must, and prefabs would fit perfectly on this land, and it’s the perfect solution for the British people, so Sir Keir Starmer, if you want to do something productive for the British people who are in this dire situation, please bring this matter up in the House of Commons because we have numerous people who are in dire need of housing, right now!

For Girls’ Safety, Students Call On Rishi Sunak To Keep Single-Sex Toilets In Schools

Five teenage lassies have written to the Prime Minister urging him to keep single-sex toilets in schools to ensure female pupils’ safety and dignity.

In an open letter, the students, who are aged between 13 and 15, called on Rishi Sunak to attack the problem head-on when the Government issues its long-awaited transgender guidance to schools.

The girls, who used just their first names to sign their letter for fear of a backlash from trans activists, said single-sex facilities were an important safeguarding feature of schools. But they warned that numerous schools had begun introducing mixed toilets without consultation to appease transgender and Left-wing activists.

The five pupils, who identified themselves as Cynthia, Marilyn, Sonja, Olivia and Ellie, said many female pupils found mixed-sex toilets ‘intimidating, humiliating and downright dangerous’.

They called on Rishi Sunak, who’s the father of two daughters, to uphold their rights.

They said that there was no justifiable reason to introduce dangerous and uncomfortable spaces into schools, and the Government had a duty to ensure that toilets in schools were safe and dignified.

The letter warns that in many schools, girls are so uncomfortable with having to use the toilets that they just don’t go to the toilet at school, risking a urinary tract infection.

They decided to write to Rishi Sunak after nearly 12,000 people signed an online petition launched by one of the girls calling for single-sex spaces to be protected in schools.

The letter cites a school in Southampton where there were recent demonstrations against the introduction of ‘gender neutral’ toilets amid assertions that boys were photoing girls in the gaps above or below toilet stalls.

A teenage boy was arrested after police investigated a report that a number of girls were being sexually assaulted in mixed-sex toilets at another school in Essex.

The girls said being forced to share toilets with boys was unpleasant for female students who were menstruating, adding that girls must have private spaces where they can sort this out with dignity, away from potential shaming from boys and the humiliation of having everyone know they’re on their period.

Cynthia, 15, said her secondary school had as many mixed-sex toilets as well as single-sex ones. She told a newspaper outlet that the mixed-sex toilets were so disgusting and unhygienic, and that very few people used them apart from the boys, so really they’re just another set of boys’ toilets.

It’s a sad time indeed when you have to appeal to a Prime Minister to keep single-sex toilets to keep young people safe, and it’s an abdication of care on an unparalleled scale to our young children and should have never happened at any price.

It’s not even about safety, although that is undoubtedly essential and should be for the protection of all, girls as well as boys, and also transgender. What it’s actually about is providing dignity and a private space for personal activity, and these mixed toilets only motivate others to corner these vulnerable girls with the goal of bullying or sexual behaviour on their minds.

Young girls shouldn’t have to beg for privacy and protection, and this matter shouldn’t have even seen the light of day because it shouldn’t have occurred, and the Government needs its head testing.

These girls are very brave indeed, they spoke their minds, and perhaps more of us should be doing that, not just about this matter, but other matters as well. The trouble is most people air their opinions behind their closed doors, screaming with frustration and anger – it’s time to come out from behind your sofas, open your front door and scream as loud as you want without persecution.

People fought much bigger wars than his, and yes, many died. People need to fight for what they believe in because we as human beings are worth more than this. I believe it’s called ‘Power to the People’, the trouble is we don’t seem to have much of that anymore.

All you people out there know what you have to do, so do it!

In Three Years’ Time, Australia May Be Cashless

A finance expert has warned Australia could become a cashless society in as little as three years with thousands of people to be left worse off because of it.

Among those who could suffer in a cashless society are people in regional areas, those caught in emergencies, indigenous Australians, new immigrants, sex workers, the elderly and even children.

Young people will suffer, according to finance commentator Sarah Wells, because they won’t learn the true value of money and lose valuable social interactions when all transactions are digital.

Sarah Wells told a newspaper outlet that she believes it’s better for children to use cash, and that giving a child $20 and taking them to a shopping centre, or the movies helps them to learn to budget and helps them to make decisions by thinking more carefully.

She said that there’s a responsibility in handing over money and such valuable social interaction, they learn to say ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ and look people in the eye.

The use of banknotes and coins sharply diminished during the pandemic, partly due to fears the virus could survive on real money and spread to humans.

Current data shows Australians have never used less cash with more and more opting for digital payments.

The Reserve Bank of Australia said in its recent Cash Use and Attitudes bulletin that the share of in-person transactions made with cash halved, from 32 per cent to 16 per cent, over the three years to 2022.

Banks have increasingly put more emphasis on digital transactions with Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB and ANZ opening cashless branches.

According to the Financial Services Union, in Australia, more than 1,600 bank branches permanently shut their doors between June 2017 and July 2022, with a ‘disproportionate number’ in regional communities that are more significantly affected.

Westpac has embarked on a ‘co-locating’ strategy in which it’s closing some separate locations of brands it owns like St George and moving them inside a Westpack branch.

The remaining big four banks, Commonwealth, ANZ and NAB have all opened cashless branches where customers are directed to ATMs for ‘everyday banking’.

Ms Wells predicted Australia is on track to stop using physical money within three to five years.

She says we can slow the disappearance of cash from society by using it when it still makes sense to do so.

The arguments for more and more transactions occurring online are generally convenience and safety.

These banks want cashless so that they can make more money on every single transaction, and governments should do their job and legislate to make sure currency will always be there.

It’s simple, if you don’t like the idea, which many don’t, then stop tapping your phone and card and start using cash again, and of course, if there was a power outage, or if the internet infrastructure got hacked then we would be screwed – we need alternatives. USE IT OR LOOSE IT!

Everyone must start using cash because our way of life as we know it is gradually slipping away.

This has nothing to do with convenience or security, it has to do with control.

What will happen if the government believes that you’ve not been paying enough tax? What will happen if they think you’ve not been eating enough fruit and vegetables, or that you’ve been purchasing too much alcohol, or socialising with the wrong people? They will be able to freeze your account and then you starve. Far fetched? Not really.

Programmable digital currency plus digital ID equals total control and we should be using cash as often as possible, and don’t frequent businesses that won’t accept it.

More Than 1,000 Tonnes Of Rotting Seaweed Swamp Kent’s Beaches

A potentially lethal health warning has been issued in the United Kingdom as a surge of decaying seaweed sweeps across holiday beaches.

More than 1,000 tonnes of seaweed has been removed from Kent’s holiday beaches between Minnis Bay and Broadstairs in just five weeks due to the surge in toxic sludge.

It’s said to have cost Thanet district council £65,000, but they’re still unable to clear the seaweed from some areas due to marine conservation zones.

The reason behind the toxic invaders coming to our beaches has been put down to ideal growing conditions in the North Sea with warming seas and strong winds.

Amy Cook, founder of the community initiative Rise Up Clean Up Margate, said while it’s typical to get seaweed blooms in hotter temperatures, this year has been unusual.

She told a newspaper outlet that this year the smell of seaweed has hung over the whole town, which doesn’t usually happen.

Seaweed is a macroalgae that can only grow in seawater. As it decays it can emit a gas called hydrogen sulphide, which can impact fish and be deadly.

UK government guidelines also explain how prolonged exposure to the seaweed can cause headaches, eye irritation and respiratory problems.

However, while the seaweed continues to cause problems, Thanet district council can’t remove it from some locations due to the presence of a chalk reef which is a marine conservation zone.

Earlier this year it was revealed that beaches in Weymouth, Dorset experienced the same problems.

One of Britain’s most popular seaside resorts, Weymouth reported signs that the beaches were gradually being reclaimed by nature thanks to a mass of pungent seaweed.

Swimmers complained of having to wade through the carpet of kelp to get to the sea.

Children have also found themselves draped in its slimy strands as they came out of the water, leading to locals calling for the ‘smelly’ stuff to be removed.

But council officials in the Dorset town said they have no plan to clear away the seaweed, which helps ‘preserve the integrity of the ecosystem’ and is an important food source for sea creatures.

This is probably because councils have no money to collect because all of it is being spent on illegals coming across on small vessels.

However, it’s not the only thing that’s being washed up on our beaches. Raw sewage is being washed up onto our shores thanks to the Tories.

Seaweed is washed up onto the shores every year, and this year is no different to previous years. The main problem is the sewage that’s being dumped because of neglected infrastructure, and then they blame it on this so-called climate change, and all because it fits the unproven climate agenda.

Sewage being dumped into the sea has caused this. This has nothing to do with global warming.

It used to be collected and used in gardens, but they’d now rather spend the money on whatever is vogue and tell us they have no money to do this. If this had washed up in London, Sadiq Khan would be getting money from the rest of the country to clean it up.

When seaweed washed up on the shore it was given to the local farmers for free for fertiliser on the basis that they collected it. In recent years the council will only sell the seaweed to the farmers, hence why it’s not collected.

This is just local authority greed and farmers could have it if they paid Kent Council money for it, and whilst Kent Council would actually benefit from the farmers removing it free of charge, it won’t happen because the Council begrudge the fact that fertiliser might be free to farmers.

Infestations Of Flies, Wasps, Ants And Bed Bugs Have Forced Britons To Flee Their Homes

Britons are being forced to flee their homes due to a serial insect infestation fuelled by the humid weather.

Experts have warned that this year has been especially bad as the wet warm weather has become a fertile breeding ground for insects, including wasps, ladybirds, bed bugs and many more.

Bin strikes across many counties in the United Kingdom have created perfect conditions for an outbreak of flies, as they feed on food waste and are drawn to the smell of decaying food.

The crafty nuisances are also being imported from other countries, such as in plants to garden centres, while deadly Asian hornets are being increasingly sighted in the south of England for the first time.

Meanwhile, Britain’s wasp population is set to have skyrocketed by 150 per cent this summer to reach 235 billion.

As there are about 67 million people living in the United Kingdom, it means wasps could end up outnumbering humans by 3,500 to one.

As a result, Britons are dealing with a wave of annoying critters in their homes, and are increasingly struggling to get rid of them.

Alarming photographs show an out-of-control ant infestation covering the whole ground floor of a home in south London.

Elsewhere properties have seen sprawling numbers of bed bugs in just a few examples of the bug-steria sweeping the United Kingdom.

In one image, a mattress had turned black with the sheer number of disgusting bed bugs. 

Penelope Banton, 26, had just moved into her first flat on her own when she became the target of a horrible insect infestation.

The PR lead was renting a flat in Didsbury, Manchester after a dream move for her new position.

But after only three weeks she was forced to vacate her new home when she discovered an army of bed bugs and fleas. 

She was forced to move in with a friend back home in Leeds for three weeks while the flat was heat-treated and fumigated. 

Penelope told a newspaper outlet that there were these three big shaggy rugs and when she put them in the bath to shampoo them, out came fleas, carpet beetles and loads of flying things that she couldn’t identify.

She said that they were all crawling out of the bath and that it was just horrific and she was getting covered in bites.

Wasps aren’t pests, neither are ladybirds, they’re simply insects – bed bugs however could be defined as pests, and bin collections in the United Kingdom are abysmal, and alternate weeks for domestic and recycling just isn’t good enough and encourages not only more insects but rats as well – this is 2023, not 1823 folks!

Rats can literally chew through anything, and day-to-day collections should be made because it’s not rocket science. As a first-world country, we should be more sanitary than this, and it’s definitely not GREEN if our rubbish collection is not collected enough.

Some places still have weekly bin collections, but recycling is usually fortnightly. In the summer months when it’s hot and humid, they should be collected every day.

Some areas only have recycling every two weeks, and refuse every three, it’s a complete disgrace.

It’s just not good enough, but the council won’t increase collections as then the council tax would have to rise also. I mean, what do they do with all the money they’re raking in from us?

The problem is that Brexit has given tremendous power to private companies and councils. That means they don’t have to follow any health or safety regulations and yet they still charge the taxpayers, and we now live in a broken Brexit Britain.

After His Surrender, Donald Trump’s First Mugshot Has Been Released

A historic first has ensued as ex-President Donald Trump surrenders at a Georgia jail on election fraud charges, and he was expected to have his mugshot taken.

The former president headed down to Atlanta, Georgia, from his Bedminster, New Jersey residence. He was officially booked and fingerprinted at the Fulton County jail.

He was then expected to have a mugshot taken as authorities in Fulton County said he could expect no special treatment.

The FAA issued a temporary flight restriction for the airspace around the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta due to a ‘VIP moment’ from 6.45 p.m. to 9.00 p.m. ET.

According to CNN, the ex-president is shaking up the legal team handling his defence in the Georgia case.

He replaced attorney Drew Findling with Steven Sadow only hours before he headed down to Georgia to surrender. The remainder of his team including Jennifer Little and Marissa Goldberg were expected to remain.

A flurry of nine of Donald Trump allies who turned themselves into the Georgia jail so far and their mugshots have been released by the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis gave Donald Trump and his co-defendants until noon on Friday, August 25, to voluntarily turn themselves over for booking and arraignment. 

They’re accused of ‘knowingly and willfully joined in a conspiracy to unlawfully alter the outcome of the election in favour of Donald Trump.

The 41-count charge against Donald Trump and his 18 co-defendants marks the fourth and latest indictment against the ex-President. Donald Trump hasn’t had to take a mugshot for his last three charges.

Donald Trump was charged with RICO, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations, a count which is often used to try mafia figures, cartel bosses and gangland leaders.

He’s also charged with solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer, conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree, perjury, and a host of other counts.

If sentenced on all charges, he faces 71 years in prison, and state charges, unlike federal, cannot be pardoned by a president.

‘America’s Mayor’ Rudy Giuliani faced the embarrassment of having his mugshot taken after getting booked at an Atlanta jail on Wednesday.

In the pictures released by the Fulton County Sheriff’s office, Rudy Giuliani can be seen looking directly ahead, showing a slight frown with industrial lighting shining on his forehead and a sheriff’s badge on his right.

Donald Trump’s mugshot will boost his poll numbers and in the end, we will see him in a Kangaroo court.

However, he did break the law, and now he has no option but to obey the law when it comes to charges against him, and now, he’s going on trial because he violated the law.

Donald Trump has never sacrificed anything for anyone. He cares for no one but himself. However, he is a genius at getting simpletons to pay him to tell them what they want to hear.

So, Donald Trump’s prison cell might await him, on the other hand, it might not, and I love that everyone thinks that somehow this mugshot is going to be something special, but it’s not, it’s just a mugshot, period, but even so, people will capitalise on it and keep this memorabilia to recall this time in history.

This has been years of political intrigue led by democrats and billions of tax dollars squandered to destroy just one man, Donald Trump, and the US is no longer a normal nation.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started