To Survive In Donetsk, Russian Soldiers Ate ZOO ANIMALS

It’s been claimed that desperate Russian soldiers were so ravenous they resorted to eating zoo animals.

Volunteer rescue workers said the soldiers committed horrible acts of cruelty at Yampil Zoo in the eastern Donetsk region.

Yampil village was liberated by Ukrainian forces on September 30.

The rescue workers arrived ten days later to discover animal skeletons and bits of flesh and bone spread across the zoo grounds.

One of the volunteers said that numerous animals had been eaten by the orcs, and according to the authorities, two camels, a kangaroo, a bison, some piglets, birds and wolves were killed.

Those animals that were saved are being cared for in the metropolis of Dnipro.

Before the February 24 invasion, zookeepers said the compound was home to a wide range of creatures, including bears, camels, antelopes and wild boars.

Volunteers are gathering materials in order to contact Ukrainian law enforcement agencies with a view to pressing charges.

Poor creatures – more victims of Vladimir Putin’s evil madness, but then I guess it’s no more than the creatures that we consume on an industrial scale every day, although they’re presumably destroyed in a more compassionate way, but then if the soldiers were starving, what do people expect them to do because desperation doesn’t always permit us to make the proper choices, it’s all about survival.

The thing is if they’re happy to kill innocent people, we shouldn’t be surprised or outraged when they start slaughtering creatures at the zoo.

This is barbaric, but needs must and they’d probably eat their own soldiers if they needed to, and to be fair, anyone would when you’re starving, and by the looks of it, they appear to be eating better than the folks back home – perhaps they should join I’m a Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here!

Napoleon said that an army marches on its stomach, and if Vladimir Putin can’t feed his troops then they’re doomed to fail.

Of course, they will be doing the same thing on reality TV soon, including Matt Hancock, and people won’t bat an eyelid over it because it’s called entertainment.

‘What’s that Skippy? There’s a Russian down a mineshaft who’s just eaten your brother?’

These Russian soldiers committed acts against zoo creatures and engaged in acts of incredible savagery, and this is particularly disturbing on an assortment of levels and in various degrees of horror. These were poor defenceless zoo animals and in addition, Russian soldiers have been sent to certain slaughter with soldiers being treated no better than the animals in the zoo.

Vladimir Putin has been described as the wealthiest man on the planet but he treats his citizens and troops as if they were zoo animals, and in fact, far far worse, and through no fault of their own, hungry people will eat what’s available, that’s a fact of life.

I mean, Vladimir Putin must really care about his troops.

I can’t condone cruelty to animals or even human beings, but if a person is that hungry they will kill anything to endure, and this is deemed acceptable, and before veggies and vegans get on the attack, take note, that in war zones very little vegetation survives, and one would get extremely hungry very fast, and in those circumstances, I’d eat anything to survive, although I doubt if the coward Vladimir Putin is going hungry.

Mind you, it’s a pity they didn’t resort to cannibalism because if they did, then there would be fewer Ruskies to fight or run from, including the animals.

Jeremy Corbyn Claims He ‘Lives Rent-Free’ In PM Rishi Sunak’s Head

Jeremy Corbyn believes he ‘lives rent-free’ in Rishi Sunak’s head given the Prime Minister’s repeated reference to him during attacks on Sir Keir Starmer.

The former Labour leader criticised Rishi Sunak for giving a wholly incorrect representation of his 2019 agenda on national security during Prime Minister’s Questions.

Jeremy Corbyn, who now sits as an independent MP for Islington North, also asked Rishi Sunak to correct the record and to accurately reflect his views rather than deliver stories made up by him or his office.

Rishi Sunak has pledged to repeatedly use Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s backing for Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership as an attack line during PMQs.

On Wednesday, Rishi Sunak claimed Jeremy Corbyn’s national security agenda included cancelling our armed forces, discarding the nuclear deterrent, recoiling from NATO, voting against every single anti-terror law we tried, and befriending Hamas and Hezbollah.

But Jeremy Corbyn said Rishi Sunak gave him no advance warning of the plan to reference him at PMQs and stated this was against the conventions of the House.

Jeremy Corbyn added to deputy speaker Nigel Evans that he gave a totally false representation of the 2019 election manifesto, which he must have been completely well conscious of because he took part in numerous discussions about the content of that manifesto during the election drive, and could they guide him on how the Prime Minister could correct the record?

And he said that if he was going to live rent-free in his head, at least he could accurately reflect what he believes and what he would say rather than fantasies made up by him or his office.

Mr Evans said MPs were accountable for the content of their contributions in the room, adding that in respect of what was said in the House, parliamentary privilege permits all Members the freedom of free speech to ensure they can represent their constituents and voice their opinions without fear or favour.

He said that this was a privilege and they must exercise great responsibility so the Treasury bench would have heard that point of order and he was confident it would be passed onto the Prime Minister.

Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt identified the need for MPs to give each other notice about plans to reference them in their addresses, and she added that she suspects Jeremy Corbyn should be prepared for him to be discussed, and in particular, the Leader of the Opposition’s support for both him and the manifesto that he stood on to be noted on at least a weekly basis.

Rishi Sunak isn’t a real Prime Minister, he’s just a stand-in until another one comes along, and Jeremy Corbyn would crucify him in PMQs if he was the opposition leader, and every time the Tories bring up Jeremy Corbyn they also need to have Boris Johnson and Liz Truss thrown back at them, and continually bringing up the former leader just demonstrates that money bags Rishi Sunak doesn’t have anything else.

And it’s a pity that everyone believed the untruths about Jeremy Corbyn because had they not we could have had a worthy Prime Minister and hopefully a more reasonable society.

This gentleman would have frightened the life out of the establishment. He was actually quite amazing, and we would have been far better off having him as a leader than ridiculous Liz Truss or Rishi Sunak who lives in Alice in Wonderland.

I believe that Rishi Sunak portrays his desperation by referring to Jeremy Corbyn, and he can barely defend Tory’s current record so he has to deflect attention by going back again to the last election and how the country rejected Jeremy Corbyn, but what they forget to note is that the country picked Boris Johnson, not Rishi Sunak, and a General Election should be called now, even if it is to just give Rishi Sunak some credibility.

Growing Up, King Charles Was Closer To His Grandmother, According To Royal Experts

Royal experts have claimed that King Charles III was closer to the Queen Mother as a young boy, as his mostly absent monarch mother wasn’t a comforting figure during an apparently miserable childhood.

ITV documentary Charles: Our King aired tonight at 9 pm, giving an inside perspective on his upbringing and how it shaped a sensitive young boy into the King he is today.

Heartwarming black and white videos painted an idyllic family image, showing the Queen smiling with joy at a four-week-old Charles.

Nevertheless, royal commentators said that they believed the young prince had a miserable childhood.

The late Queen was coronated in 1953 when Charles was four years old. A clip of him at the coronation showed him standing next to his grandmother the Queen Mother, as they looked on at the monarch being crowned in front of the entire world.

Catherine Mayer, author of Charles: The Heart of a King, said that he grew up in an isolated world and that she dubbed it ‘Planet Windsor’, and that it works on a slightly different set of rules to planet Earth. It looks and sounds like ours but it’s extremely lonely.

She said he was extremely young when his mother became Queen and the bond he had with his mother was never as strong as it might have been because she had a lot of responsibilities.

The children lived on the top floor of Buckingham Palace at the time where there was a nursery wing and the Queen would visit her children.

Penny Junor, author of Charles: Victim or Villian? said that the Queen would go up and see Charles but more often than not she held back, she wasn’t that all-encompassing comfort that a child normally expects from a mother.

Clips were then shown of Charles beaming up at Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, King George VI’s widow, on a train platform, as the narrator explained that he would develop a close bond with the Queen Mother as his parent were frequently away travelling the globe.

In 1954 the Commonwealth tour lasted six months, and Catherine Mayer described the moment Charles was reunited with his mother after her long time abroad. She said that finally, the royal yacht anchored, and the dignitaries stood waiting, and the young prince was so enthusiastic he lined up with the dignitaries to see his mother.

But the Queen was extra busy, so his Grandmother stepped up.

Charles as well as his siblings had nannies to alleviate the Queen of any care they needed, while their mother was busy waving, smiling and attending functions, and being a good mother was not one of them, but then being Queen wasn’t a 9-5 job, it was a vocation, and it must have taken up almost all of her time, energy at such a young age. She had a duty to the Realm and Commonwealth, which always came first, even before her children.

Perhaps the Queen Mother spoilt him and his siblings, and gave him a sense of entitlement, although he was going to be the next King, he didn’t actually need a sense of entitlement, he was literally entitled.

Then there was the footage of the Queen returning from a long tour and shaking 3-year-old Charle’s hand when she meets him, I mean, what normal mother does that? But the Queen wasn’t a typical mother because her title, and position as Monarch made it impossible for her to be a normal mother.

Mutiny In The Making?

The owner of Celebrations boxes has chosen to roll out Bounty free tubs ahead of Christmas, and you’ll be able to exchange normal tubs for free.

Mars Wrigley has announced special tubs of the chocolates will be available at select Tesco stores in the run-up to Christmas.

Revellers who don’t care for the smooth coconut and chocolate delicacies can exchange normal tubs purchased in stores with Bounty-free ones for free, from November 8.

It comes as more than a third of Britons have admitted they don’t want Bounties in their festive red tubs.

Customers will be able to get their hands on the boxes at 40 special Christmas Market pop-ups in Tescos around the country.

For these limited edition tubs, additional Mars, Snickers, Milky Way, Galaxy and the all-time favourites, Maltesers, will be added in place of the banned Bounty bars.

Tesco Christmas Market is a pop-up roadshow, starting in Manchester on Tuesday, December 8 and making its way down the country, closing on December 18 at Gallions Reach Extra in London.

Customers who can’t make it to those places can enter a competition on Tesco’s website to win a Bounty free tub.

It comes as Mars Wrigley debuted the Bounty Return Scheme in 2021, where customers could exchange unwanted chocolates for Maltesers after the festive period.

Emily Owen, Mars Wrigley’s head of Celebrations Festive Cheer, said that Christmas was the time for giving, but it appears this year, the British public is keen for them to take away Bounty.

She said that last year, they gave customers the opportunity to return their unwanted Bounty chocolates and that now, off the back of public demand, they’re trialling taking them out of the tub completely, and she said that you don’t know what you’ve got until its gone, and to those loyal and secret Bounty lovers out there, there’s still a possibility they’ll make a return after the trial.

The problem with chocolates is that some people like some but not others, and then they’re other people that just can’t eat them because of allergies, but isn’t this just pure wokery?

A 26-Year-Old Mother Gave Birth Five Minutes Into A Taxi Ride

A mother who gave birth to her daughter in the back of a taxi going at 40mph claimed she was left shocked when the taxi firm sent her a cleaning bill for £60.

Farah Cacanindin, 26, had just left the hospital for a routine examination for her pregnancy when she unexpectantly went into labour on the taxi trip home in Buckinghamshire.

A newspaper outlet reported that astonishingly, Ms Cacanindin was able to deliver her baby Naia herself while the taxi was still moving.

The cab driver called ahead to Stoke Mandeville Hospital to warn staff they were coming before dropping her off.

Baby Naia, bound in her mother’s jacket after she was born, was safely looked after when they arrived and the pair were allowed to return home. However, Ms Cacanindin claimed she was stunned when she was sent a £90 bill from Arrow Taxis to her home in High Wycombe, £30 for the journey to the hospital and £60 to clean up the mess.

She said she appreciated there had been a mess in the back of the taxi, but that it was an outrageous thing to do when she’d just gone through an unexpected delivery.

Ms Cacanindin said that she understood that she did make a mess but it was a tad cheeky to have charged her.

She said it was the quickest delivery ever, and that her waters broke five minutes into the journey. The driver asked if she wanted him to pull over but she said to keep going as she believed she would make it before the baby was born.

She added that she can still see the car her daughter was born in at the cab company just down the road from her home.

Arrow Taxis has been contacted for comment.

But why should the taxi company have to pay for the cleaning? It’s not cheeky for the company to charge for this, but it is cheeky for Ms Cacanindin not to pay and then run to the press as if the company had done something wrong.

Perhaps she should ask the hospital to pay the bill as they mistakenly discharged her home when evidently she shouldn’t have been.

It was a taxi, not an ambulance, and the cab driver would have had to take the car off the road for cleaning and probably have lost earnings.

The taxi company are in the right. If it was anyone else who made a mess they would be expected to pay, and if she refuses and gets away with it, then taxis might start refusing to take women in labour and then where would we be?

This cabbie will be off the road and won’t be able to take any more customers until it’s cleaned and sanitised. Is this woman actually expecting the taxi driver to lose his entire income because she doesn’t want to pay to clean up the mess?

No one’s saying that she did it on purpose, of course, she didn’t, or that it was her fault, it wasn’t, but it is her responsibility.

What this lady should be doing is be grateful for the safe delivery of her baby, but instead she’s whined about it with not a thought about the cab driver or his loss of wages.

I wish all the best to the new mother, but you still have to pay because you can’t expect the cab company to relish your happiness.

It’s pretty standard practice these days for anyone soiling the inside of a taxi for whatever reason because the driver will lose money by not being able to work while his car is being brought back to a functional standard and that’s without the expense of cleaning it, and most people would have been happy to pay the fee without having to bleat to the media for sympathy.

Worker Tax Raid By Rishi Sunak

New research reveals that Jeremy Hunt will rake in thousands of pounds extra from all average workers over the next five years without making a single change to the tax system.

The Chancellor is planning a string of tax increases to be unveiled in his Autumn Statement on November 17, but just as important as what he intends to change is what he plans to leave the same. Reports suggest he will leave income tax thresholds where they are, despite skyrocketing inflation.

The freeze to income tax thresholds up to and including the 2025/2026 tax year was announced during the Budget in March 2021, by Rishi Sunak when he was chancellor.

Over the past 20 years, average wage growth per year has been close to 3 per cent per year. Nevertheless, with inflation now in the double digits it’s likely to be higher over the next few years.

With a 3 per cent wage increase, someone making £35,000 faces having paid an extra £1,177 in income tax by 2028, but if wages rise by 5 per cent per year the figure will be more than £2,000 by 2028.

Shaun Moore, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, which carried out the analysis, said that the calculations show the power of fiscal drag and how freezing income tax thresholds was a form of stealth tax.

He said that ultimately, if thresholds stay frozen for a number of years, then you would end up paying vastly more tax, and thresholds were meant to remain frozen until 2026 but with the cost of living crisis weighing heavy on government spending, this could be extended.

The Chancellor is set to meet colleagues this week as they attempt to hammer out a package ahead of the crucial Autumn Statement on November 17.

Jeremy Hunt warned business leaders that there was no way of sugarcoating the fact that personal and business taxes were going to increase.

According to Politico, he told an event at Claridge’s hotel in London that it was going to be a tough pill for everyone to swallow.

Rishi Sunak told Cabinet that difficult decisions were coming, but highlighted the NHS would be prioritised for funding while making clear that in return the health service would need to accept reform.

Nonetheless, that means other departments are facing even deeper curbs, as spiking inflation erodes the value of their budgets, and Defence Secretary Ben Wallace told a House of Lords committee that he will suggest to the Chancellor that the strength of the army could remain at 76,000 rather than dropping to 73,000 as intended.

It appears that Rishi Sunak doesn’t want to remain Prime Minister for long, and how will he restore the Conservative Party after the next election I wonder?

So, once again the ordinary working people will be made to pay for the incompetence, blunders, failures, downright lies, arrogance and inflexibility of Rishi Sunak, Hancock and Johnson, and they will never admit their numerous blunders, and will never apologise, but will just penalise the law-abiding, hard-working, lower and middle classes, while protecting the pretentious, wealthy tax avoiders, and select few.

It’s the politicians that have screwed the economy, they’ve been making money hand over fist and yet the masses get to pay for it. Politicians are the problem, not the people.

Stop handing it out to those that don’t even have a right to be in this country, let alone experience any of its privileges. They should also cut the MP and civil servants on high income because cuts never come from within.

Escape From Manston

The first coaches taking migrants out of the overcrowded immigration centre in Kent where conditions have been described as inhumane have set off, as Government ministers made the startling warning that 50,000 people are expected to cross the Channel this year.

Dozens of coaches with heavily tinted windows have taken migrants at a former RAF base in Manston to hotels or hostels around Britain.

Some of those inside waved or gave the thumbs-up sign as they left, evidently relieved at escaping the base which was described as being like a pressure cooker.

The Manston migrant centre, which opened in January 2022 was originally designed to hold up to 1,600 people for no more than 48 hours but instead has become a temporary home to nearly 4,000 migrants, leading to outbreaks of Diptheria, scabies, MRSA and violence, and many of those staying in Manston are women and children and are thought to have come from Syria, Afghanistan and Iran.

The departure of the migrants came as the union representing Border Force workers at Manston said that the Home Office planned to move 400 people out of the site on Tuesday followed by a comparable number over the proceeding days.

Lucy Moreton of the Union for Borders, Immigration and Customs (ISU) said there were now coaches on site with the intention of moving some migrants on to more suitable accommodation, and she didn’t know how many would go but that they were told the aim was to move 400.

Ms Moreton also called on the Home Office to increase support for staff working at Manston.

She added that sadly, nothing was being done to ease the pressure on staff and that they’ve asked the Home Office for increased support, for well-being and mental health services and for assurances to address staff concerns around the legality of instructions they’re being given, the sustainability for the short and medium term and any outgoing danger to staff, but that the Home Office hasn’t responded.

It comes as Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick warned that as many as 50,000 migrants could cross the Channel this year, which would be not only nearly double the total number of people who made the dangerous crossing last year, but a new annual record.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman previously told the Cabinet that the Home Office had reopened its Dover immigration centre following a firebomb attack.

The Western Jet Foil centre, used to process asylum seekers after their arrival in the United Kingdom, was closed following the attack on Sunday. Two people inside the migrant centre reported minor injuries, and the 66-year-old man suspected of carrying out the attack was subsequently found dead at a nearby petrol station.

Meanwhile, our British homeless sleep outside in the cold. We don’t pay our taxes to fund migrants coming into our country. This would all easily be resolved by returning them home.

Even better, they should apply legally. There should be no reward for bypassing the legal process, and anyone who arrives through any illegal route shouldn’t be allowed to stay, so why are they being processed? This is unsustainable!

We very seldom hear of MPs talking about our British homeless people, but when it comes to boat people they’re talking about it all the time, and there’s not much point in having a Government or political players if they can’t do the basics, like border control, and our Government should be looking after its own first.

And this is all going on while our very own pensioners, homeless and vulnerable struggle, and if the migrants don’t like the conditions they’re in they can always go back if they don’t like it.

Children As Young As Nine Are Given Puberty Blockers At The Tavistock Centre In Scotland

According to a bombshell investigation, children as young as nine have been given drugs for puberty blockers at a Scots gender clinic dubbed ‘Scotland’s Tavistock Centre’.

The report by NHS clinicians found youngsters with gender dysphoria have been given the drugs at the NHS-run national gender service in Glasgow, a disproportionate number of whom were on the autistic spectrum.

Many also had conditions such as anxiety and depression, increasing fears over future legal action from those who may claim to have been misdiagnosed.

The dossier revealed similarities between the Sandyford clinic in Glasgow and the Tavistock child gender identity development service (GIDS) in London, set to be shut down after it was heavily criticised in a review by Dr Hilary Cass, whose report said it was unsafe for its young patients.

The report into the national gender identity service revealed that a total of 91 youngsters aged between nine and 17 were referred to paediatric endocrinology between 2011 and 2019.

Two-thirds of those referred were birth-assigned females.

Almost a quarter were on the autistic spectrum, and 37 per cent had mental health disorders such as depression.

Only six out of 64 young people eligible for fertility preservation finished the process.

Campaigners have called for the clinic to be closed, and a spokesman for campaign group For Women Scotland said that the parallels with the ill-fated Tavistock were stark and that endocrinologists were halting children’s puberty with experimental drugs, and it was said that it was vital that the Scottish Government acted immediately to close Sandyford and to not do so would be gross medical negligence and likely to attract, as is happening in England, legal claims from former patients.

Dr David Bell, a psychiatrist who raised concerns about the Tavistock said that there was a lack of proof worldwide on the effects of prescribing puberty blockers for gender dysphoria and there was considerable concern that they may interfere with brain and bone growth.

He said that a national gender service was the wrong model and that these children and young people needed to be understood in the context of the other mental health problems they were experiencing.

The findings were revealed in a study paper by NHS clinicians who carried out an assessment of the Scottish service, which they said had clear benefits for youngsters with gender dysphoria as it had a range of different specialists.

This is so immoral and there are no success or fail statistics for these procedures, phycological or physical. In fact, after decades, they’re still classified as experimental and how can an adult make an informed conclusion without understanding the dangers, particularly when it comes to a youngster?

This should be made illegal and the immoral people behind this should be named and shamed because they’re destroying people’s lives, and this is the reason why we end up with crowds of people demonstrating, but then, of course, they get yelled at and abused for protesting, but ruining children’s lives is not acceptable when they’re ending up with irreversible bone density problems and brain development issues, yet the money keeps rolling in for pharmaceutical companies.

These mad experiments have been going on for far too long, going back hundreds of years, so nothing has changed, and all in the name of science and the public purse.

This is simply disgraceful and this place should be closed down, and where is the safeguarding for these vulnerable children? It’s disgusting what is happening to these children. Too noisy, here take a pill, being a child, here take a pill!

A Mother’s Heartbreaking Farewell

This is the tragic moment a grief-stricken mother elephant carries the limp body of her deceased calf to its final resting place in a powerful funeral ritual.

Sad footage illustrates the mourning elephant taking her calf towards an acacia tree in the Torra reserve in Damaraland.

Other members of the herd unite and walk together in silence as part of a respectful parade for the late elephant.

The calf was less than a week old when it died after water dried up in the region.

While other younger elephants continued to play in the reserve, many of the more senior members all turn and stroll towards the tree where the calf is laid to rest.

Safari guides told Corriere Della Sera they’d never seen elephants performing a funeral ritual before.

The two rivers serving the Torra reserve have both run dry in recent weeks with the wells also out of order.

After the ceremony, the elephants continued as a group in hope of discovering water.

Elephants have been known to observe funeral ceremonies, frequently spreading branches over a corpse soon after death.

They also have been seen raising their feet above a dead body as a mark of remembrance or scattering their remains.

This is heartbreaking, and a clear reminder of the importance, and respect for our families, and some animals are amazing, and we as human beings should learn from them.

Elephants are such beautiful creatures, and this is so painful to watch. They’re living, breathing souls who feel pain just like humans, and we should respect all animals.

Elephants are extremely intelligent emotional creatures, and we should be doing more to protect them and understand them. They’re beautiful animals and it’s just a disgrace we don’t treat them with respect.

Animals are far more intelligent than we give them credit for and as human beings, we’re more stupid than we believe we are, and hopefully, these creatures will outlive the human species.

Perhaps we should spare a thought for those beautiful creatures and indeed all the others in the world, whose sheer existence is endangered every time a human being buys stuff that they don’t need or want. Stuff that has to be manufactured, needs to use the world’s resources in order to do so, usually not caring what habitat is sacrificed on the altar of human selfishness. Think twice before buying something new. Do you actually need it, or just want it?

There are so many amazing species in this world.

We, humans, are meant to be at the top of the food chain but time after time we see animals showing more care, more respect, more compassion and more openness towards each other than we ever do either to them or to ourselves. We may be the most evolved species but when you see things like this, I just can’t accept that we’re the better species.

No creature (human beings) on the planet is more brutal, more violent, or capable of deceit, or capable of killing the world. Every other creature is a blessing to the planet, and living according to nature’s plan – we’re the only deviant species.

These animals have very similar sentience as us humans, yet we treat them so differently, but they’re such a beautifully evolved species, yet some societies kill them just in order to collect what, in effect, toenail clippings, and then you have to think about the calves being torn away from their mother’s and butchered.

After Joining I’m A Celeb, Matt Hancock Is Expelled From The Parliamentary Tory Party

Matt Hancock was booted out of the parliamentary Tory party after sensationally revealing he’s agreed to star in I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!

The former Health Secretary, who quit after breaking his own lockdown rules by having an affair with long-time aide Gina Coladangelo, will become the 12th celebrity heading to the Australian wilderness.

The news started a prompt rebuke from Conservative high command, with Chief Whip Simon Hart confirming he’d had the whip removed, the same fate that befell fellow Tory MP Nadine Dorries when she went on the show in 2012.

Simon Hart said that following a discussion with Matt Hancock, he’d considered the situation and believed that this matter was serious enough to warrant suspension of the whip with direct effect.

Matt Hancock will remain as MP for West Suffolk but act as an independent, and while he’ll be able to keep his party membership, he won’t be able to stand for election as a Conservative hopeful, vote in party contests or stand for committee chair positions.

A political ally said he’d admitted he was unlikely to become a minister again and wanted to connect with younger generations.

The ally said that politicians like Matt Hancock must go to where the people are, particularly those who are politically liberated and that Matt’s of the belief that we must embrace popular culture, and rather than looking down on reality TV, we should see it for what it is, a powerful tool to get their message heard by younger generations.

According to the source, Matt Hancock first downed the chance to appear on I’m A Celeb because of the instability the government was facing at the time. Nevertheless, he now feels the administration is stable and considers his stint on the show as an excellent opportunity to talk about issues he truly cares about.

The ally said that when he was first approached to take part, and while he was flattered and intrinsically interested, it didn’t take him too long to turn the opportunity down because of the instability Government was facing at the time.

They said that Rishi Sunak has made a terrific start and the entirety of the Conservative Party is united behind him. Rishi has a big majority, so he can get his plan through Parliament, and Matt talked to the whips, in the same way any MP would when going on a foreign visit, which happens all the time.

The issue here though is that Matt Hancock has now made the Tories look even more like a circus show, but then I guess we needed a good chuckle, and his constituency party should have got rid of him a long time ago, especially when he broke his own rules, and it’s mind-boggling to the average person why Tory devotees worship this joker and lick his clown shoes, and it’s actually perfectly evident now that the Tories have no intention to help with the cost of living crisis, but they do intend on lining their own pockets.

The reality TV show shouldn’t be called I’m A Celeb, it should be called I’m A Politician who broke God knows how many COVID rules while sermonizing to the public.

Matt Hancock was a joke of a minister, a joke of the government, and the joke of the country, but then I suppose you could say that about the lot of them whilst they’re busy feathering their nests at our expense, and clearly Matt Hancock doesn’t think with his brain, just other regions of his body.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started