CAN I HAVE MORE SIR?

In England in school, food is provided at lunch time, which is governed by both food-based and nutrient-based standards.  Also food and drink supplied in an average school lunch must meet standard set for 14 different nutrients, so I was pretty appalled to read in the news that a young boy in a school in Paignton had been declined lunch over a £1.75 outstanding debt, that unquestionably doesn’t meet the criteria set for 14 different nutrients.

Unknown-1

Across Europe, school lunch is the foundation for boosting the nutritional intake of ALL school children, unless of course you are in debt for a meagre £1.75 .

Not only was this young boy refused lunch, but he was left in tears and extremely upset about the event and, was given an apple because the assistant felt pity for him, or else he would have gone all day with no food at all and, then this child had to do his schoolwork in those conditions.

Unknown

Could a letter not have been sent home to the parent prompting him that he owed the money, instead of making this young boy go without food for the whole day that he was in school?

After all, it is the parents duty to provide, not the child who is a minor and, should not have been victimised because his father had simply forgotten.  After all, we live in a busy and complex world and, people are not unfailing, not even the school and, errors are made and, bills are occasionally left unsettled because we fail to remember, or simply have to rob peter to pay paul.  Myself, I am guilty as charged, I am continually robbing peter to pay paul, simply because my money may not have been paid on the day that the bill needs paying and, sometimes we are a day behind schedule or a few days late.

Unknown-2

I could appreciate if the boys father had not paid his lunch bill for weeks, but over £1.75 – did they really attain anything by that little outburst, or did someone really get great pleasure out of making this young lad go without a hot meal for the rest of the school day?

And that’s what it’s all about!

Having a fire service is unquestionably critical, it is a foundation of teamwork.   It is necessary because it can’t work with just a single fireman, it demands numerous firemen. images

Fire and rescue officials have a responsibility in law to encourage fire safety and react to fires and, an assortment of other urgent situations.

They assist in reducing deaths and injuries and, the overall prevalence of fire. images-1

Fire deaths in the home have halved since the 1980’s.  Since 2007 the number of accidental fire deaths in the home have stabilised at around 210 per year.

Nevertheless, fire and rescue authorities face additional problems, they need to be able to cope with the dangers of terrorism, against the necessity to cut the national deficit, which appears far more important than preserving a persons life, but Boris Johnson seems to have the need to axe Westminster fire station. Unknown

He may save £40 million, but these cost-cutting actions will mean that 500 firefighters will loose their livelihood, which also means that the response time getting to fires will be less and, more lives will be endangered.  It also means that some of those 500 firefighters will now be jobless, but nevertheless apparently more people are getting back into work – I can feel a song coming on here, “In out, in out, shake it all about”.

Boris Johnson has got it totally wrong this time and, I’m actually wondering if this was his idea at all.

No Room at the Inn

It is completely shameful that a family should be put into bed and breakfast, but to be put into just one room with four children is no more than infestation and, could also source communicable diseases such as lice and scabies, which then makes it a health matter. Unknown

District councils have a specific legal responsibility towards homeless people. images

If any person is homeless or is threatened with being homeless, the council have an obligation to give them help and support.

Councils should be fined if they do not give people the duty of care that they warrant, particularly when there are properties out there that the councils are leaving vacant for months on end before repairing them and, putting tenants back into them, that have been left in bed and breakfast or shelters for months with very young children.

It is not only unsuitable that councils are putting people into bed and breakfast, but it is also a health risk.  Overcrowding causes diseases, which then extend to other people in the surrounding area, which will then have grounds for them to be closed down, as it would do if it were a restaurant or a large hotel. environmental_health1

A bed and breakfast accommodation is a guest house or small hotel offering sleeping accommodation and, meal in the morning, which means that it has to comply with the regulations of Environmental Health.

In fact, have Environmental Health not remarked on Environmental problems where a large amount of people are being housed in B&B because the councils are not doing their job properly?

Government practice is that B&B accommodation is appropriate for families in a crisis situation and, for no more than six weeks, although I know a great deal of people that are often left for seven weeks.

If it is government policy, then why are councils taking it upon themselves to leave people in there for longer – are they not executing an unlawful act?

If this is an illegal act, which plainly it is, or else they would not have been fined, then it should be looked into instead of being pushed under the rug and, the people or persons should be held accountable.

God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages. ~Jacques Deval

TIMES ARE CHANGING – THE REAL VALUE OF POVERTY

 

Poverty is very high and, the statistics are even higher for some groups such as children, the elderly and the sick, but the difficulty is so misconstrued, because people only think of poverty as something that is drastic and endangers one’s life, like in developing countries. p19_poverty11

 

Nevertheless, poverty is extremely real and, it brings unhappiness to people’s lives and, is a direct assault on people’s basic rights and, restricts opportunities so that they can’t reach their full potential, it also excludes people socially and, limits their access to resources and, opportunities and, makes them feel discriminated against. Unknown

 

It makes them feel vulnerable and, at risk because they are without those resources.  They end up owing money, suffer poor health and, also have an education disadvantage and, live in inadequate housing and, they end up in relative poverty.

 

Some can only provide low-priced food, fruit and vegetables to feed their children is too costly and, healthier food is too dear for them to buy.

 

The trouble is not that they run out of cash, there was no money in the first place and, the problem is that they live their whole life that way and, their children grow up that way too – try explaining that unfairness to your children. images

 

Some people lose friends because they can’t take part in interests that others can, some can’t even go to self-help classes because that needs money and, there’s no additional money to do these things.

 

The system is too complex and, people don’t know where to go to get what.

 

Now that they’ve brought in the “under occupancy”, people can’t pay this extra money and, they will end up on the streets.  Some will end up sleeping in cardboard boxes, some will attempt to get assistance, but they will be challenged with huge red tape, having to tell their story several times, again and again before they might get somewhere and, they may get a little sympathy from someone, but the rules still stop effective help.

 

The way people look at you is humiliating and, you are not deemed a human being.

 

Sometimes animals are better protected and, you struggle, but there is no real hope any longer.

 

Children won’t be able to ask their friends over anymore, because in the end homes will be too small, so they will be excluded and, then they will be required to lead a invisible life.

 

Parents of children will no longer be able to pay for school holidays or cultural pursuits and, children will bequeath their parents poverty.

 

IS THIS OUR FUTURE?

 

Draining us Dry

Government spending
Government spending (Photo credit: 401(K) 2013)

If the government suspend minimum wages, then would it not be right in saying that employers will be able to take the out-of-work people and, pay them essentially what they want?

If they are paying them £1 or £2 an hour, would that not be slave labour? Unknown

That would also mean that we’d not be within the guidelines with living standards and, in the end the government would drain us dry and, why should we work for next to nothing, when a majority of people have worked arduously, gone to college or university to be informed that they have to take jobs that are only paying stupid money, when everybody has the right to participate in work and, to follow a freely chosen or recognised profession. Slave+Labor+(Bunting+Boy),+London,+2012

The government is taking away our civil liberties, because a right is something you may demand of someone, while a liberty is freedom from intrusion by another.

The government is taking away our freedom by hindering and, making the choices for us.  We do not get a say in this, so consequently they are taking away our civil liberties.

It is our human right for life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness, the be able to develop one’s persona to the fullest of its potentiality and, to safeguard dignity.

Our civil liberties give us rights and liberty, which means, the right to life and, security of the people, which we do not have with this government.  It also gives us the freedom of expression.

I’m expressing my desire to be listened to.

Escape the Cage!

Unknown

In 2012 in the United Kingdom, an Act of Parliament was brought in, which they named The Welfare Reform Act, which then made alterations to the rules connected to a number of benefits, which had been formerly provided to the people of the United Kingdom within the bounds of the British social security establishment. 2162610423_53ac7bf19a

Among the terms of that said act are the changes to housing benefit, which came into power in 2013, these amendments include the “under-occupancy penalty”, which then reduces the amount of social security that is paid to applicants if they are deemed to have too much living space in the property that they are renting.

Now the government want us to live in rabbit hutches because we we do not deserve space, we are no more than animals in a cage.  Like Battery hens, or cows that our keeper can ram when we do not walk the line.Unknown-1

The British Chancellor of the Exchequer supporting this act was stated as saying that the changes would reduce welfare dependency and support working families.

Nearly all working families are not paid enough to pay their rent, they scrimp and save to get by each week without the introduction of the bedroom tax, and in addition, the council tax.  Now that they have to pay the extra, they will be worse off.

What you will get in the end are shops that will shut down, because people will not be able to pay for their goods.  So the extra monies that they are making people pay will be of no value to them because shops will shut down, they will go into liquidation, they will not able to afford to stay open because no one will be able buy their merchandise.

If consumers stop buying, the country will come to a halt.

As far as humanity goes, people have suppressed their people, although one of the sizeable successes of our world was the capacity to end such an evil.  People rose up and, were against that enslavement, well that’s what we’d like to believe anyhow.

Buying and selling and, human trade is illegal, nevertheless it happens to us everyday.  Not just in different cultures, but in our culture as well.  It’s the supply chain and, it’s that supply chain that suppresses more people.

An independent market should come from free people, that we work to provide simply because we need to exist, not because it will supply additional money.

Like all creatures, human beings want to control and take advantage of those resources around them.  At first, we hunted and fished and, ate off the land, but then something exceptional and unpleasant happened to our minds.

Loneliness encircled the animals, who were now scared to die and, scared of loss.  And this was the start of a considerable tragedy and, an even more considerable possibility.

You see, when we become frightened of dying, of injury and, imprisonment, we become controllable and, beneficial, in a way that no other resource could ever be.

We don’t realise that we are being controlled, it’s all extremely ingenious and, the public just have no concept of what is going on.  We watch TV, films, adverts, songs, they all control our minds, it’s called Mass Mind Control, it’s the present-day science of mind control and social engineering, but they will tell you it’s for the greater good of humankind.

However, even though people are waking up to the real world of our expanding see-through cage, there are just about enough people who choose to stay asleep and, then there are those who were awake and, then went back to sleep.

It’s a carefully crafted plan to dumb down the population and, the government are the undergraduates to the magicians of power and propaganda.  To beat your opponent, it’s vitally important that we understand how they think and what they believe.

BUT you don’t have to believe me, you can read for yourself: http://rense.com/general69/mass.htm

ESCAPE THE CAGE, THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX!

Money, Money, Money!

70337742 They are helping themselves to money that is obviously not theirs to take.  This money was the taxpayers money, they worked arduously for it and, it is taken by the tax man to pay for second homes and, going to the gym and, then they have the gall to take additional money off us and, tell us it’s to pay off the deficit and, then say, “We are all in this together”.

Take everyone that has fiddled the public and, make them pay it all back, including MP’s and, anybody in the cabinet.  I wager after taking all that money back, that would fill the hole in the deficit, it would unquestionably make our economy a bit more promising.

Why should they get expenses anyhow, don’t they get paid enough without the extra pleasures, but give a man half a hand and, he’ll take a whole one.  It’s called gluttony, pure and simple hunger for more, there are no other words for it.

 

The Brotherhood of Who?

Unknown

Whilst I don’t think it would be a good proposal to depart from the EU, because of the commerce that we have with other EU countries, I also believe that our difficulty with work is because we’re in the EU and, that other EU countries can come to England to work, therefore leaving Britons out of work.  Although, I must say at this point, I believe it was an extremely bad idea to team up with the EU in the first place, who’s bright idea was that?

Before we joined up with the EU, Great Britain had quite good trade with other countries within the EU anyhow, so who thought to go and damage that association?

If we left the EU now, I think that a lot of countries, particularly France would take considerable offence to the fact that we had left and, would not trade with us any longer and, even though they said that they would, so the story goes, they said that they would roll out the red carpet for us, but I still believe they would make it very hard for us in the long run.

I don’t believe we should continue to be in the EU, although there are a lot of good things to stay and, then there are a lot of bad things to make us think that we should come out of of it.

I think that the British public should be allowed to decide.  I also believe that the British public should be allowed to decide if we want a Prime Minister to be in control or not.  Why should we be dictated to by a leader, are we not competent enough of leading ourselves?

Conveyor Belts and Robots

English: A collection of pictograms. Three of ...
English: A collection of pictograms. Three of them used by the United States National Park Service. A package containing those three and all NPS symbols is available at the Open Icon Library (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Atos
Atos (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Handicapped
Handicapped (Photo credit: a77eBnY)

The recently developed structure of paying benefits, that will have an effect on disabled people across Britain is dawning and, a large amount of claimants will loose their benefits because they’ll not be considered as being sufficiently disabled.

A test to see if someone is disabled enough can’t be done in a few hours, or even a day, it would have to be done over an interval of time, because everybody’s illness or disability differs day-to-day.

The person who is ill or disabled, should be evaluated by their own GP or consultant at the hospital that they deal with, because that is their doctor and, that doctor has known them for a lengthy duration of time and, has all their medical records, so consequently they are the best people to determine that persons illness or disability, not someone who comes in from an independent agency such as ATOS, who knows entirely nothing about that person and, believes that they can make a fact-based supposition of that persons illness or disability over the course of 45-minutes to an hour.

These interviews by ATOS can be frightening and, can appear like you are being tried for an illness or disability that you did not bring about, it just became.

It was not that persons misdeed, nor did they cause it, it is just a fact of life, that a person at some time or another in their life will get ill, or will become disabled.

The method that they use is profoundly unsound and, they’re failing to remember that they are evaluating human beings, not androids that they can have restraint over, because it’s all about authority concerning the people of Great Britain and, preserving money.

When you are being evaluated, you’re just a number, one more number in a line of numbers, pounds and pence, that’s all that you’re worth to them.

It’s a tick-box type medical evaluation.  If you can bend or turn, hold out your hand or nod your head, you will be deemed suitable for work, but they’re a large number of ill and disabled people that can do these things, it doesn’t make them fit for work.

For instance, someone may be able to bend to pick up a teacup from a table, but they may not be able to put on their socks and shoes.  Some may be able to hold out their hand, but can’t hold a cup properly.  Some may even be able to nod, but they find it hard to swallow, eat or tolerate certain foods and, they’re just some of the examples, but this tick-box evaluation doesn’t deal with everything that needs to be assessed.

To evaluate a person properly, you need to start regarding them as a human being and, with due regard and, not like a conveyor belt of robots.

It is our human right to be regarded with dignity, which must be respected and protected at all times.

Dignity of a human being is a basic right in itself.

Any man or institution that tries to rob me of my dignity will lose.
Nelson Mandela

In the face of a fun-guy!

English: Psilocybe Cubensis Español: Psilocybe...
English: Psilocybe Cubensis Español: Psilocybe Cubensis, mejor conocido como cucumelo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Ancestry
Ancestry (Photo credit: John-Pa)
English: Eton College Chapel, near to Eton, Wi...
English: Eton College Chapel, near to Eton, Windsor And Maidenhead, Great Britain. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Seven years of cuts?  They’d have to be in power for that long, the way that things are going, will they get in at the next election?

Saying that, they’ve just got under two years to cause even more destruction on Great Britain and, what astonishes me is that they’re so delighted in what they’re doing and, in their little world of unicorns and magic mushrooms, they think they’re doing something virtuous.  It must be all that cannabis that they allegedly smoked in their Bullingdon boy days, it’s messed up their brains.

Mr Cameron admitted he’d done things when he was young that he shouldn’t have done and, that he’d been disciplined for smoking the drug while at Eton and, he’s still doing things that he shouldn’t do, pulling the wool over the publics eye’s, maybe he should be disciplined for that as well?

It makes good sense, that if they can assemble their Bullingdon society back then, then they can orchestrate their gathering of annihilation now and, they have.  I can visualise what must have been going through their heads back then, they must’ve had the idea that they could cause chaos, but instead they caused chaos on their own kind.  They might not think that everyone is evenly matched, but they are, unless of course they have different coloured blood coursing through their Bullingdon blood vessels?

But of course it’s not about blood, it’s about Ancestry, the who’s who of who and what family and, if you don’t fit in, then you don’t count and, you’re of no importance to them. 

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: