It’s Time To Pack. Know Where To Find Your Medicines

New York City Mayor Eric Adams said the recent city public service announcement on how to deal with a nuclear attack was prompted by Russia’s attack on Ukraine and warned that the Big Apple was still a big target.

The mayor said this was right after the attacks in Ukraine, and the Office of Emergency Management took an extremely bold step to say ‘let’s be prepared. Pack a bag and know where your medicines are located’. He said that these were just savvy things to do, and that numerous people think about COVID and other things that have been on the forefront but that they’ve got to stay on top of the terrorist threats.

The emergency management agency put out a 90-second PSA weeks after Russian state media declared that Russian President Vladimir Putin could wipe out the United States.

The mayor promised the city wasn’t on high alert for a nuclear attack and soft-pedalled the announcement by saying residents should be equally ready for natural catastrophes, like hurricanes or floods.

He said there were no looming threats to the metropolis that they knew about, but that they always have to be prepared as New Yorkers.

In the new clip released on Monday, the city’s Office of Emergency Management informed New Yorkers: ‘So there’s been a nuclear attack. Don’t ask me how or why. Just know that the big one has hit. OK. So what do we do?’

A city spokesman tells citizens that while the possibility of a nuclear weapon incident happening in or close to New York City was very low, it’s essential New Yorkers know the measures to stay safe.

Adams supported the agency’s video, and he said that he didn’t think it was alarmist and that he was a great believer in better safe than sorry. Nevertheless, he emphasised that what motivated the agency to nudge New Yorkers to prep for a nuclear attack was the Russian invasion.

He said that his understanding was that it was about taking the necessary measures after what occurred in Ukraine to give preparedness.

In May 2022, Russian state media issued a chilling new nuclear threat to the US, bragging that Vladimir Putin would wipe out the entire East and West Coasts with only four missiles.

Alexei Zhuravlev, a member of Vladimir Putin’s puppet parliament, issued the threat, saying that there would be nothing left on either coast after strikes using Russia’s new Sarmat 2 nuke and that the mushroom cloud would be observable from Mexico.

It’s fairly clear that the Russian leader Vladimir Putin has suggested that he would consider using nuclear weapons if faced with a NATO military response in Ukraine, or if confronted with an immediate threat to his person or regime.

The world is therefore arguably now closer to a nuclear confrontation than at any time since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. So what would a full-scale nuclear exchange look like in reality? Would it really be a global Armageddon, or would it be survivable for some people and places?

Many scientists have examined this question already, but their work is surprisingly unknown, probably because in peacetime no one wants to think of the unthinkable.

The latest assessment of Russian nuclear military capability estimates that as of early 2022 Russia has a reserve of about 4,477 nuclear warheads, nearly 6,000 if ‘retired’ warheads were included.

The US holds a comparable inventory of 5,500 warheads, with 3,800 of those rapidly deployable.

The explosive power of these weapons is difficult to comprehend and it’s been calculated that approximately 3 million tons (megatons or Mt) of TNT equivalent were discharged in World War II. For comparison, each of the UK’s Trident submarines bears 4 megatons of TNT equivalent on 40 nuclear warheads, meaning each sub can generate more explosive destruction than took place during the whole of World War II.

In 1945 the US bombed the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with atomic bombs, giving us two real-world instances of the effects of nuclear weapons on human populations.

A total of 140,000 people in Hiroshima and 73,000 in Nagasaki died instantaneously or within five months due to the nuclear blast, intense radiant heat from the fireball and ionizing radiation.

Numerous people caught within 1km of ground zero were carbonized by heat rays, and those up to 1.5km away suffered flash burning with large regions of their skin later peeling off.

Some, especially those inside buildings, were reduced to white bones as all flesh was vaporized by the extreme heat.

Numerous survivors, subsequently become known as ‘hibakusha’ in Japanese, suffered acute radiation sickness (ARS) from neutron and gamma rays emitted by nuclear fission in the blasts.

Symptoms included bloody diarrhoea, hair loss, fever and intense thirst. Many subsequently died. As well as direct radiation from the fireballs they were also exposed to radioactive fallout from the bomb.

The longer-term effects of radiation encountered by the ‘hibakusha’ have been intensively studied and included increased levels of leukaemia and solid cancers.

However, experiencing an atomic bombing was not an automatic death sentence: among the 100,000 or so survivors the excess rates of cancer over the following years were approximately 850, and leukaemia less than 100.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki show that, apart from short-term ARS, long-term radiation from the fallout would be the least of our problems following a nuclear war. Much more severe will be a social collapse, famine and the breakdown of much of the planetary biosphere.

Previous to the Ukraine war, it seemed extremely unlikely that the superpowers would confront each other again, so many researchers turned to studying the impacts of more limited nuclear conflicts.

However, would this lead to human extinction?

Even the 150 Tg soot nuclear war scenario is orders of magnitude less than the amount of smoke and other particulates put into the atmosphere by the asteroid that hit the Earth at the end of the Cretaceous, 65 million years ago, killing the dinosaurs and about two-thirds of species alive at the time.

This means that some humans would survive, eventually, to repopulate the planet and that a species-level extinction of Homo Sapiens is unlikely, even after a full-scale war. Nonetheless, the vast preponderance of the human population would suffer extremely unpleasant deaths from burns, radiation and starvation, and human civilization would probably collapse completely, and survivors would eke out a living on a devastated, barren planet, and it’s ridiculous that people would honestly believe they’d survive a nuclear strike anywhere near where they live.

And why would people be packing a bag, where are they going to go if a nuke was sent? And I’m pretty confident that a nuke is going to travel quicker than most humans, so your go-bag isn’t going to be of much help to anyone.

So, where are all the bunkers? Oh yes, I forgot, they’re not for the likes of us common people, they’re for all the elites, and there wouldn’t be any point remaining indoors because there wouldn’t be a building standing, they would have all been destroyed, and all that the government is going to do is destroy us all by their incompetence.

Pack a bag for what? Most people would be dead!

My Real Name Is Hussein And I Was Smuggled Into The United Kingdom

Mo Farah has sensationally admitted that he was trafficked into Britain and spent his early years here in domestic captivity.

The Olympic champion totally topples the already incredible story of his life in a BBC documentary, The Real Mo Farah, which is to be publicised tonight.

Far from him coming to the United Kingdom to live with his father, his father was in fact dead, a victim of the civil warfare in his native Somalia, and, incredibly, Mo Farah isn’t even his real name.

The actual back story was that he came to Britain as an eight-year-old and lived with an aunt and uncle because his father showed little interest in him.

Equipped with just three English phrases, ‘Excuse me’, ‘Where is the toilet?’ and ‘C’mon then’. He was enrolled in a tough junior school in the predominately white area of Feltham, west London, where his refusal to be cowed meant he was forever getting into fights.

His troubled upbringing was splashed across the papers after he achieved a golden double, in the 5,000 and 10,000 metres, at the 2012 Games in London.

But it was far from the whole story. Yes, Sir Mo Farah, as he is today, was born in war-torn Somalia, but almost everything else about his earlier life is fiction.

The most spectacular bombshell is that young Mo didn’t come to the United Kingdom legally.

Instead, he was ‘trafficked’ into Britain and spent years in domestic captivity, forced to be a skivvy for the family of the woman who brought him here.

Sir Mo said at the start of the BBC programme that there was something about him that they didn’t know.

He said it was a secret that he’d been repressing since he was a child and that now he was able to face it and talk about the facts, how it transpired, why it transpired, and that it was tough.

He said the truth was that he was not who everyone believed he was, and that now, at whatever cost, he needed to tell the real story, and over the course of the next soul-searching hour, Sir Mo, 39, did just that, and at one point, he produced his visa document, saying that it was his picture, but it wasn’t his name.

In fact, Sir Mo was born Hussein Abdi Kahin, something he only completely understood much later and is still struggling to make sense of.

It seems that Sir Mo deceived everyone, but then so has Boris Johnson, but the difference is Sir Mo has done something with his life – I’m not sure what Boris Johnson has achieved.

Sir Mo was a child when he came to England and he must have been terrified, but he has done so much for Great Britain and he had the strength to do that and has shown us his incredible talent.

His whole life was at stake and he had no choice but to keep silent about it. It’s the traffickers who brought him here that should be brought to justice. He was a child and was just trying to survive.

He didn’t concoct the plan, his aggressors did that. He was just a child and he didn’t even know his name was different, and it’s so worrying that children can be exploited like this.

And those that have never been in servitude could never imagine what it must have been like for a child, like Mo, who was treated in such a harsh way. It doesn’t make him a bad person and it’s actually none of our business.

The United Kingdom Is Experiencing A Heatwave

The heat wave has hit the United Kingdom.

Temperatures have soared in Britain this week, with London setting a new UK 2018 temperature record on Monday, June 25, hitting 29.4C.

It’s expected the temperatures will cross the 30C mark this week as well, with parts of the South East going as high as 33C, which would make it warmer than parts of Brazil.

All of this means that offices and schools around the country will be fast ensuring that their air conditioners and fans are up to scratch to deal with such scorching temperatures, but can the heatwave become so intense as to force schools to close?

Here’s all you need to know about this, including what the guidelines are and what to do if your child ends up being sent home from school.

How hot does it have to be for schools to get cancelled in the United Kingdom?

Schools follow the same rules and guidelines as places of work. This means that, just as in offices, there’s no official law setting out minimum or maximum working temperature, or when it’s too cold or too hot to work.

However, there are official government guidelines suggesting that the minimum temperature for office workers should be 16C, although no recommendations have been issued for maximum temperatures.

The main rule surrounding workplace temperatures was set out in the Workplace (Health and Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, which says that during working hours, the temperature in all workplaces inside buildings should be reasonable.

The National Union of Teachers said that people work best at a temperature between 16C and 24C, before going on to say that people could faint, get dizziness and have heat cramps in extremely hot conditions.

The World Health Organisation says that 24C should be the highest temperature. If enough people complain after this limit, the company should carry out a risk assessment.

Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary of the NEU, told a newspaper outlet that increased temperatures in schools impact the ability of students, educators and staff to focus and function effectively and can lead to exhaustion, tiredness and ill health.

He said that presently, there’s no legal maximum temperature for schools and colleges and this can lead to uncomfortable conditions during hot weather. The National Education Union advises its members that temperatures above 26C are too hot for effective teaching and learning.

However, back in the day come rain or sunshine, schools were never closed because of the weather.

Faith Is What Drives Us, Not Fear

Three former workers are suing Walt Disney World, saying they were fired after refusing to wear face masks and getting the COVID-19 vaccine due to religious reasons.

Barbara Andreas, Stephen Cribb and Adam Pajer said in the suit filed June 30 that the firm discriminated against them by not accommodating their ultimata to be excused from the company’s directives mandating the vaccine and facial coverings.

According to the lawsuit, Andres and Cribb were terminated in March, while Pajer was let go in June.

The trio, who are all devout Christians, had worked for the company for between seven and 20 years.

Disney’s vaccine mandate was stopped in November after Ron DeSantis and Florida lawmakers restricted the power of bosses to require employees to be vaccinated.

The company subsequently dropped masking requirements for vaccinated workers.

The suit claims that Disney’s augmented protocols that were forced on non-vaccinated workers consisted of harsh seclusion and restrictions that caused serious breathing and made it almost impossible to find a compliant manner and place in which to eat or drink while on shift.

The lawsuit also notes that Disney has brought wonder and magic into the lives and homes of millions, but the company has cast itself as the villain and a cloud has come over Disney during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Andreas, who’d worked for Disney for 17 years, had sought a religious exemption, arguing that wearing a facial covering was an insult to her Christian convictions, and she said that ‘we live by faith, not fear’.

Andreas has filed for an exemption founded on her Christian belief.

She explained that she’s extremely uncomfortable doing this and that now it’s been going on for four months, waiting for an exemption to not only the vaccine but mask-wearing as well. All the things that she made clear back in August were a violation of her religious beliefs.

Disney then revised its health and safety regulations.

Andreas said that no longer was the fabric mask acceptable, now it was an N95 with the word warning written across it.

The suit also claimed that partaking in a medical experiment, such as COVID testing or vaccines also violated her beliefs because she believes aborted fetal cells were used to manufacture it.

It’s not true the COVID vaccines were made using fetal cell lines and they don’t contain aborted cells.

Vaccine manufacturers Pfizer and Moderna used fetal cell lining early during COVID vaccine development to test the effectiveness of their formulas, but the fetal tissue that was used in such processes was from elective abortions that happened decades ago.

Medical exemption has been banned in several different settings, which is absurd considering that people are now discovering that these vaccinations aren’t even that effective and they’re now causing all sorts of inflammation in the body.

Women can go to different states to have an abortion because it’s their body, their choice, but if an employee doesn’t want to have the vaccine then it’s no longer their body or their choice.

Sadly Disney is owned by them, so it’s their rules and they have the right to set their policies on their employees, just like building sites have the right to demand hard hats, high viz jackets, toe protection and respirators if they think the work requires it, but then hard hats, high viz jackets et cetera aren’t intrusive but COVID jabs are!

Faith is not a law, and Disney is a private company but just because it’s a private company doesn’t mean that they can do whatever they like, especially discriminating in whatever formation it comes in.

Just The Ticket!

All local and regional bus fares in England could be capped at £2 this autumn.

Prices could be slashed for six months from October, with bargain rates for cross-country journeys of up to 80 miles and lasting more than three hours.

Downing Street has reportedly been working on the scheme since April but it’s not known if a new prime minister will affect its introduction.

The project comes amid skyrocketing fuel prices, with the price of filling up, increasing by £9 last month.

A source told a newspaper outlet that the importance of an eye-catching enterprise like a £2 flat fare is that the government can get behind it and say that they’re supporting people over the winter.

Bus services in England are presently more costly and less regular than in London, where pay-as-you-go fares are £1.65 if made within an hour.

It means an 80-mile journey from Peterborough to Norwich could be cut from £12 to £2, and a comparable length trip from Leeds to Whitby could be decreased from £19.

A Department for Transport spokesman said he wouldn’t comment on speculation, but he said in a statement that they’ve already committed to investing £3 billion into bus services by 2025, to improve fares, services and infrastructure, and given almost £2 billion since March 2020 to bus operators and local authorities to mitigate the impacts of the pandemic.

The primary goal is to decrease the cost of travel in rustic areas and to city centres from outer suburbs, for commuting, shopping, relaxation and school journeys, but there will also be big bargains on more extended journeys.

The price cap will reportedly not apply to long-distance scheduled coach services, and will also not apply to Scotland and Wales.

Bus price caps of £2 to start in the autumn have already been announced by the Labour mayors of West Yorkshire, Greater Manchester and the Liverpool City Region.

They’re expected to last three years and are aimed at helping urban commuters.

Bus travel has been in long-term decline since the 1950s, and half the population take the bus less than once a year.

However, the sudden and dramatic growth in petrol prices means numerous drivers are likely to seek alternative ways of getting to work and travelling locally.

This is a great idea as long as the buses are frequent, but in some areas, there’s only one bus an hour.

At the moment even taking a two-stop journey, less than 1km costs something like £4.95, it’s madness. It’s no surprise that people don’t want to use the buses when it’s so costly, and what about trains? The United Kingdom appears to be the only developed country where long-distance train travel is basically unaffordable.

And why are the Government doing it in October? Why don’t they just do it now?

The reason why is because Boris Johnson has quit, so essentially this will never be a thing, but bus fares are outrageously high and if OAPs and the disabled didn’t get free bus rides none of them would be able to afford to travel and they would be stuck in their homes, so public transport needs to be improved.

However, they should also be doing this for train journeys as well because it seems strange to just have it for bus travel alone.

People need help in rural areas as well because buses don’t operate much in these places and if they do then it’s one bus every 2 hours, and in some areas, if there are two of you it works out more affordable to get a taxi than a bus.

After Telling Santander Staff He Was A G4S Guard, Clever ‘Bank Robber’ Walks Out With £150,000 In Cases

A thief posed as a G4S security guard to fool bank staff into giving over money boxes with £150,000 inside.

The criminal walked into a Santander’s Brixton branch in a uniform kitted out with both helmet and visor, although sources claimed it wasn’t even a G4S uniform.

The man reportedly showed a fake ID and took two boxes at once, which is against regulation.

A source told a newspaper outlet that it’s being called the Noah’s Ark job because the cash boxes went out two by two.

Another source said questions had to be asked as they claimed the uniform wasn’t even a G4S one.

The criminal may have had a getaway driver waiting to rush him away from the scene in south London.

Staff at the Santander branch only became worried it was a con when the thief didn’t return to sign for the six boxes that had £25,000 each in them.

Although the money boxes have coded dyes that would soak the bank notes if anyone unauthorised accessed them, the criminal may have had inside help to get past this barrier.

Police have been questioning staff and examining CCTV of the suspect. Santander is working with the police on the matter.

This was a cunning criminal, but you’ve got to almost admire him for his arrogance, and how foolish were Santander staff because just a quick phone call to his company to check would have told them that he was a con man.

This dude just strolled into the branch with a fake ID, yet you can’t open a simple account and deposit money without an appointment, ID and your life history.

It looks like the staff were to blame for this one. They know the routine, but they didn’t observe it.

Bank staff have to do numerous checks before they even let the man into the area where they would give him the boxes, and if any one of those checks fails they call the police straight away, so how on earth did this happen?

I didn’t realise that Santander was giving money away which was a tad foolish of them seeing as there was no collection scheduled. Now that’s what you call great customer service.

Clearly, this was extremely well planned in advance, although this guy just strolled in there and took the cash straight from their hands. It does make you wonder about the level of intelligence of the staff because Santander clearly doesn’t employ the sharpest tools in the box.

Generally, money talks and BS walks. On this occasion, BS talks and money walks.

Technically he didn’t even rob the bank. The fools just gave him the cash and he just strolled out of the bank. He was brazen, to say the least, but at least nobody got hurt.

University Chiefs Ban Students And Academics From Using Terms Such As ‘Mankind’, ‘Millennials’, And ‘Manpower’

The Universities of Bristol and Nottingham have reportedly banned words like ‘mankind’ and ‘millennial’ to avoid causing offence, while terms such as ‘manpower’ are to be replaced with ‘workforce’.

Woke chiefs at the Russell Group schools fear that everyday expressions contribute to stigmas and can have negative associations it was reported by a newspaper outlet.

At Bristol, students and faculty have allegedly been told to replace the term ‘manning’ with ‘stationed’, while’ able-bodied’ people should now be called ‘non-disabled’.

The 146-year-old university, which counts celebrities like Simon Pegg, David Williams and Matt Lucas as alumni, has also asked that generational monikers like ‘boomers’ and ‘millennials’ be avoided.

As part of its style guide, ‘humankind’ should also replace ‘mankind’, while ‘workforce’ should be used instead of ‘manpower’.

In its writing style guide on its website, under ‘specific terminology’, it reads: ‘Avoid using generational labels (‘Generation X’, ‘Baby Boomers’, ‘Millennials’) where possible, and that it could reinforce negative stereotypes, and the words were not easily understood, especially by some international audiences.

It adds when writing about people in older age groups, the term ‘older people’ is generally preferred and that words like ‘senior’, ‘middle aged’, ‘elderly’, ‘pensioner’, ‘OAP’ or ‘senior citizen’ should be avoided.

Meanwhile, at Nottingham, phrases such as ‘the request fell on deaf ears’ or ‘blind spot’ are now considered out of touch for potentially ‘associating impairments with negative things’.

Words like ‘lame’ and ‘stupid’ are also now discouraged.

Bristol Uni agrees, as its style guide reads: ‘Avoid slang that associates a disability with a negative trait, such as ‘falling on deaf ears’, ‘turning a blind eye’ or ‘the blind leading the blind’.

The guide adds: ‘Use the term ‘non-disabled’ rather than ‘able-bodied’ if you need to describe people without disabilities’.

Tory MP Nigel Mills told a newspaper outlet that free spe

Tory MP Nigel Mills told the Sun: ‘Free speech really is at risk because of these ridiculous ideas.’

Both universities were contacted by a newspaper outlet. Bristol refused to comment.

It comes after the University of York faced ridicule when it slapped a trigger warning on one of its archaeology courses, warning students they might see photos of human remains.

The bizarre flag was placed on its Communicating Archaeology module which starts in September.

Department heads risked being accused of patronising its budding Indiana Joneses over the warning of content surely expected on a course of its nature.

Now it seems that our children and young people are being brainwashed by their woke teachers, and will all our dictionaries and thesauruses be burned because the English language is transforming, so is there a new edition that we’re not aware of?

Words are being burned in front of our very eyes and we’re doing nothing about it, and this appears to be the UK’s version of the book burning in 1930s Germany, and we should be protesting and be as relentless as the woke because this idiocy needs to stop, and when will the sheep stop blindly following these loons?

What right has anyone in a position of power have the ability to determine what terms of speech should be permitted? They should be named and shamed and then removed because it’s a disgrace to our history of freedom.

These are not places of education but indoctrination.

And these people who make these decisions, are we allowed to call them ‘dicks?’ Or is that not politically correct? Or do we just call them ‘genitalia’ from now on?

By manipulating language they control thought. If they control thought then they control action. If they control action then they control the world and we are indeed living in extremely dangerous times!

EXCLUSIVE: Another Work Do For Downing Street?

Boris Johnson was pictured laughing and joking last night as he canoodled with a bunch of elites on a Whitehall patio just hours after he announced his resignation.

The disgraced Prime Minister was seen hobnobbing with several coworkers and officials, giving out hugs and cracking jokes as the party drowned their collective sorrows on a balcony behind Dover House.

The ambience was light and friendly, according to witnesses, with the assemblage quickly gathering pace as the evening drew on.

One said it definitely wasn’t commiserations, they were in fine spirits as the group were spotted while attending a military band concert held on Horse Guards Parade a stone’s throw away from Dover House and Downing Street.

They said Boris Johnson gave someone a hug. It looked like a bad day at the office, let’s have a drink and cheer up, and they were laughing and chatting on the terrace.

They said it started just after 7 pm when Boris Johnson went inside and the party appeared to be in full swing.

Meanwhile less than half a mile away, several of the cabinet ministers and government officials whose resignations and criticism hastened the Prime Minister’s downfall enjoyed some schmoozing of their own at The Spectator’s summer bash.

Former chancellor Rishi Sunak and his successor Nadhim Zahawi, who accepted the position on Wednesday, then publicly told the Prime Minister to resign less than 24 hours later, were among those pictured in attendance at the grand press party on Old Queen Street, a mere 500 yards away from the Prime Minister’s gathering.

Ex housing and communities secretary Michael Gove, who was promptly sacked upon calling for the Prime Minister’s resignation, and former health secretary Matt Hancock also rocked up to the party whose guest list also included top political journalist Laura Kuenssberg and chairman of The Spectator Andrew Neil.

It comes as Tory MPs begin competing for Boris’ premiership in what’s set to be a painful shootout for the right to succeed the outgoing Prime Minister.

The friendly atmosphere displayed by Boris Johnson and co on the Dover House patio last night didn’t reflect the mood which hung in the air in Downing Street hours earlier.

Boris Johnson’s team were said to be in tears as the Prime Minister ultimately admitted he had run out of options, while the Conservative leader himself was said to have been optimistic rather than enraged upon realising they had tried everything around 8.30 am yesterday morning.

Boris Johnson clearly didn’t play a straight bat greeting the job, and he made sure he had his own people around the Cabinet table, but his version of reality became too much for them, with their constituents bearing the brunt of decline and collapse.

He is a disgrace, he broke the law, he lied to the Queen, lied to parliament and now he’s been forced out of his job because he lied again, but of course, after this Boris Johnson will be drowning in employment offers, he’s set for life, and now he can do whatever he wants to do because he will be free of the endless bellyaching.

Our politicians are elected to represent and act upon the best interests of the British people, not to cosy up to media honchos. This is part of the reason or reasons why our country’s in such a mess.

We can’t have a political system whereby the Prime Minister or indeed any politician has to dance to the tune of the media and then they’re penalised by the press itself, and if that’s the case we may as well do away with our electoral system and hand our country over to billionaire media moguls.

Neither lot is working in the best interest of the people of our country because they’re far too self-serving, manipulative and greedy to give the British people as much as a second thought.

The system is now run in the best interest of the elites and those who toe the line serve to feather line the already versus wealthy pockets who are presented to the people of our country as the good guys and that kind of clique has to go.

Is The Millennial Generation Putting Lullabies To Sleep For Good?

Classic cradlesong are at risk of dying out as almost half of millennial mothers and fathers don’t know all the words to Twinkle Twinkle Little Star.

A poll of 2,000 parents aged 26 to 41 revealed just 53 per cent can recite all the lyrics to Baa Baa Black Sheep, while only 51 per cent can sing Row, Row, Row Your Boat in its entirety.

Even Humpty Dumpty baffled half of those polled, while Jack and Jill
was known by just 43 per cent, and three in five parents can’t soothe their babies to sleep with a full rendition of Rock A Bye Baby.

Only 34 per cent could sing the entirety of Little Bo Peep, dropping to 29 per cent for Hush Little Baby and 28 per cent for Frere Jacques.

One in ten millennial parents said they don’t sing lullabies at all because they have a horrible voice or feel uncomfortable. Instead, one revealed to rapping Kanye West tunes to their baby, while another sang The Rolling Stones classics. Yet 83 per cent still thought that the bedtime routine was a critical bonding experience.

The study, commissioned by baby products manufacturer MAM, also discovered nine in ten parents read bedtime stories, and 43 per cent think these are better for soothing their children. Millennials stuck to the classics, with The Very Hungry Caterpillar, The Gruffalo and We’re Going On A Bear Hunt the most favoured.

Lisa Parkhill, from MAM, said that getting a little one off to sleep was a special, soothing time spent between babies and parents, even if some of the methods might be deemed unconventional.

She said that it’s intriguing to learn just how many depend on the power of their voice to support their baby during these moments, yet many recognise they won’t be releasing a hit single anytime soon.

She said that as parents develop those unbreakable bonds with their children, they learn just how important bedtime is to soothe their little ones, and even a brilliant opportunity to unwind.

These rhymes are part of our cultural heritage. It’s a shame that they’re being forgotten, and everything from our history is being erased, and most parents now are far too busy to get off their phones – children
being ignored while the parents walk along looking at their phones with no interaction with their children at all, so now children don’t know how to play as the parents never show them or spend quality time with them, they give their children an IPad to distract them instead, and they give them a ridiculous device to shut their children up.

Children’s rhymes were lovely with parents singing Round and Round The Garden and Incy Wincy Spider, and it didn’t matter if you had a good singing voice or not, parents used to sing themselves stupid to amuse their children.

It actually makes you wonder how many parents still read to their children at bedtime, or do they just hand their children a tablet until they fall asleep? As a child, my mum read to me at night, every night and I always looked forward to it, but a lot of things are dying out, it’s a new revolution.

The Cost Of Living Crisis In Britain

Shoppers hoping to pick up their favourite brand of butter may be in for a shock after it emerged one supermarket goliath was now selling Lurpak for more than £7 a tub.

The luxury butter brand, first produced in Denmark in 1901, has become a staple for millions of households across the country, but families might soon be turned off by the eyewatering price of a pack of Lurpak.

Images online showed a 750g pack of its lightly salted spreadable butter listed for £7.20 in Sainsbury’s this week.

The news comes amid the worst cost of living crisis since the 1970s stoked by unbridled inflation, with experts warning that the worst could be yet to come.

Sainsbury’s boss Simon Roberts last month warned that the cost of living crisis will get worse before it gets better.

The chief executive said customers were facing the most difficult of times, adding that the effects of this were going to last longer than he was sure most people anticipated months ago.

He said that the cost of food, fuel, fertiliser and labour have all gone up and that they were seeing substantial cost impacts and they’re not going to go away any time soon.

He said that households up and down the country were facing real challenges and that it was challenging for customers and challenging for households trying to manage their budgets.

It comes as a typical family of four’s shopping bills could increase as much as £40 per month in the latest pinch on domestic finances as necessities such as bread and dairy look set to increase, and the staggering rise in prices doesn’t just stop at dairy products.

Recent Retail Price Index figures for goods purchased by ordinary shoppers revealed the average cost of a roasting joint of beef had increased by 9.8 per cent to £11.34 over the year to April, while chicken had risen by 10.4 per cent to £3 a kilo.

But caterers are reporting even more dramatic rises of between 20 and 30 per cent for numerous products, with prices continually changing by the week.

The cost of mince beef rose by 11 per cent overnight in recent days, Laca said, while one catering company saw the cost of 10kg of prepared potatoes increase from £10.46 to £15.50.

Elsewhere, Heinz staples such as baked beans, ketchup, salad cream and soup skyrocketed in price by up to 55 per cent in June.

Data from retail research experts Assosia shows the cost of Heinz beans is up a third in Asda since June 17, up from 90p to £1.20 per can, while a standard bottle of Heinz squeezy ketchup is up by 39 per cent in Morrisons from £2 to £2.79.

People are now aware that everything has gone up, but things just don’t go up overnight and this seems like heinous profiteering by manufacturers and retailers in the guise that everything’s going up, so let’s get on the bandwagon as well so that they can make a bit of dollar, and greed is a big factor and does this now mean that stores like Asda won’t have any roll back prices? After all, the price of everything has increased, so clearly they won’t be able to afford it! And the sad thing is now that prices have gone up, they will never go down again.

People should stop purchasing products that have become eye-wateringly expensive and start buying cheaper products, then the more expensive products will rot on the shelves. They’ll soon put their prices down.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started