NHS Breast Surgeon, 57, Who Was Fired After Setting Patient On Fire

An NHS surgeon was sacked after a patient was accidentally set on fire during an operation has won almost £65,000 in a race and unfair dismissal claim.

Breast specialist Obi Iwuchukwu, 57, was suspended after a woman sustained significant burns whilst he operated on her in August 2013.

Mr Obi Iwuchukwu had used an alcohol antiseptic on the patient that ignited like a flash of lightning when he then endeavoured to use a heated surgical tool to sterile wounds.

All personnel involved in the incident at the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust hospital received counselling, an employment tribunal heard.

More than five years later, after a long legal action, the surgeon has won compensation, successfully demonstrating that he’d been unjustly dismissed and racially discriminated against by the hospital trust.

However, the damages he will get are nowhere near the £5 million he was originally seeking.

The latest tribunal in Newcastle heard that Mr Iwuchukwu, formerly from Nigeria, began work in Sunderland as a general surgeon with an interest to breast surgery in 2007.

During his time there he had several run-ins with co-workers, the panel was told.

This involved an incident in which he clashed with a German co-worker who told him that they weren’t working out of a hut in the Congo, which Mr Iwuchukwu answered that Britain was not like Nazi Germany.

The tribunal also heard how co-workers had started to have concerns about Mr Iwuchukwu’s performance, in particular the number of complications his patients suffered after surgery. Then on a fateful day in August 2013, a grave incident took place during an operation he was conducting.

The tribunal panel was told that during the operation he was handed alcohol, rather than an aqueous, based antiseptic solution which he applied to the patient.

He then used a diathermy pen which targets electrically induced heat to prevent the wound from bleeding. It ignited the alcohol preparation and the patient suffered a significant burn.

It was described in the subsequent investigation as though a flash of lightning had entered the theatre. All staff were given counselling.

The hospital suspended Mr Iwuchukwu, the only black man of African birth working there, and began a string of investigations before concluding in November that year that system error rather than individual human error was mostly to blame.

Despite this, the hospital continued with the surgeon’s suspension without evaluating whether he could return to work in some fashion.

He had various problems with his co-workers and patients – would you want him operating on you? And it’s of no surprise the NHS is short of money because of all these payouts, and no one stated how much the patient was paid out.

The surgeon was given the wrong solution by another member of staff whilst operating. It wasn’t his job to check, the operating theatre should have been kitted out for that particular surgery before he even entered the room, and then suddenly it became a racist matter, but what about the poor patient?

However, patients do sign consent forms before any surgeries, in case something goes wrong, although I’m sure it didn’t say on the form ‘In case we set you on fire’.

PRINCE CHARLES AND CAMILLA HAVE HAD FIRST COVID VACCINE DOSE

Clarence House has confirmed that the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwell have had their first dose of COVID 19 vaccinations.

Prince Charles, 72, and Camilla, 73, are both in the fourth priority groups for the jabs, given they’re both over the age of 70.

Details about where the vaccines were given and which version was given have not been made known.

News of the couple’s first jab comes after Prince Charle’s parents, the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh, were vaccinated last month.

The 94-year-old ruler and Prince Philip, 99, were given the coronavirus jab at Windsor Castle, and Buckingham Palace, which seldom comments on private health issues concerning the royal family, also announced that the vaccinations were given by a royal household doctor.

Prince Charles tested positive for coronavirus in March last year.

Clarence House stated at the time explaining that the Prince of Wales was exhibiting mild signs and was isolating at the Birkhall residence in Scotland.

A Clarence House spokesperson said at the time that he’d been exhibiting mild symptoms but otherwise remained in good health and had been working from home.

The spokesperson said that the Duchess of Cornwall had been tested but didn’t have the virus and that following Government and medical advice, the Prince and the Duchess were now self-isolating at home in Scotland and that the tests were carried out by the NHS in Aberdeenshire where they met the criteria needed for testing.

The spokesperson explained that it wasn’t possible to ascertain from whom the prince caught the virus owing to the large number of engagements he carried out in his public role during the weeks prior.

Regardless of which version of the vaccine the royal couple were given, they will require a second dose to be completely vaccinated.

But surely everyone going to work should be a priority to keep this country afloat. The Queen and Prince Philip can shield because they have no financial concerns, and this has all become a little irritating.

The idea was to protect the elderly and vulnerable, with the top four tiers they fit into because they couldn’t jump the queue, and it now appears that having the vaccination might not prevent the spread of the virus.

And some people are saying that working people should be having the vaccine first and that those who are too old or not working can isolate, but this is barely breaking news.

But then the elderly and vulnerable have been isolating for almost a year, and let’s face it there’s not many perks to being old, so we shouldn’t really begrudge them this, and it also means that families don’t have to run around after them as much, especially if they’re a key worker or homeschooling their children.

And the vaccine has not properly been tested and it’s still being trialled and we’re all being used as guinea pigs all in the name of big pharma, but I guess it’s nice to catch up on our royal family and get positive news, but two pensioners getting their jab is hardly news, is it?

COVID Strain Discovered In Bristol

The mutated coronavirus variant first discovered in Bristol was identified as a variant of concern by UK scientists.

Public Health England said it has now found 21 cases of this variant of the virus, with 14 in Bristol and the South West, four in Manchester and three spread across the United Kingdom.

It’s a strain of the Kent variant, the dominate strain of the virus in England, which has mutated further to develop a change first found on the South African strain which may make vaccines less effective.

Because of this mutation called E484K, which also increases the chance of people getting reinfected after they already had COVID 19, experts are desperate to stamp it out.

It becomes the third variant of concern found in Britain, alongside the now dominant Kent variant and the South African one. A fourth, one of two strains from Brazil, is also listed by Public Health England but it’s not yet been discovered in the United Kingdom.

Experts said they were concerned about the Bristol variant’s combination of mutations because it would be at least as transmissible as the fast-spreading Kent variant but also possibly able to evade immunity from vaccines.

Although it’s not likely to take over and become dominant now, there’s a chance it could come through when the Kent strain has been suppressed by vaccines.

The Department of Health announced it had completed its surge testing, which is used to weed out these variants, in Woking, but started it in Lambeth, London.

The spread of differing variants across Britain is causing a storm now because of the risk that one will render the long-awaited vaccines less effective.

Most worrying is the spread of the E484K mutation that seems to give the virus the capacity to get past immunity developed against older variants of the virus.

This mutation initially appears randomly, and it appears to do so fairly frequently, but sometimes becomes a permanent feature of a variant because it gives it an advantage in that it can reinfect people who would be protected against other variants of the virus.

Another new strain found hiding. Isn’t that just grand? They can find a new strain of the virus, yet they can’t uncover the five million illegal immigrants living here. You know the one’s the then London Mayor Boris Johnson wanted to give amnesty to.

It’s absurd to think that you can hide from this or stop variants at the border.

We have the capacity for similar or identical variants to mutate within the United Kingdom and it’s happening already and we’ve never seen so much fear since World War II, and as soon as the Kent, South Africa and Brazilian strains identified, there comes another one.

It seems this COVID is pretty smart, and now it’s mutating. It won’t be long before it can travel 2 metres, and it seems that at the moment the United Kingdom is the petri dish of the world.

There are billions now being made by vaccine companies, but no statement of this, and if we don’t watch out we’re bordering precariously close to exaggerated behaviours, and people will stop listening and lockdown will falter.

And no doubt, this new strain of the virus will be another reason for Boris Johnson to lock us down even longer, but then this appears to be the plan, to keep giving them different names so that they can keep us living under restrictions, but suddenly not a single mention of China.

Māori MP Rawiri Waititi Removed From New Zealand Parliament In Necktie Squabble

The Māori party co-leader Rawiri Waititi has resisted the order to wear a tie in the New Zealand parliament’s debating chamber – and was quickly removed by the Speaker.

MP Rawiri Waititi said as he left the chamber that it wasn’t about ties, it’s about cultural identity.

Earlier, exchanges over the dress code between MP Rawiri Waititi and the Speaker of the House, Trevor Mallard, had grown heated, with Rawiri Waititi saying he’d chosen to wear cultural dress – “Māori business attire” – to the chamber, with a pounamu or greenstone necklace in place of neckwear.

Trevor Mallard said that Rawiri Waititi would not be called on to speak if he was not wearing a necktie, and when Waititi proceeded to speak, he was removed from the chamber.

Rawiri Waititi has previously described ties as a colonial noose and last year he was removed on the same grounds.

Trevor Mallard last week decided to keep the requirement that male MPs wear ties in parliament’s debating chamber, after inviting members of parliament to write to him about what constituted suitable business attire in the House.

Māori Party co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer decided to wear a necktie, despite not being required to as a woman.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said she had no particular objection to ties not being worn in parliament, and she believed there were more pressing matters to address in the debating chamber, such as how to resolve the housing crisis.

She said that she didn’t think that New Zealanders cared about ties.

The new parliament is the country’s most diverse and inclusive, including 48 per cent women, 11 per cent LGBTQI, 21 per cent Māori, 8.3 per cent Pacific, and 7 per cent Asian New Zealand members, and there have been growing calls for members to be allowed to wear cultural interpretations of formal wear, in addition to men being allowed to remove their ties.

Trevor Mallard said that in deciding on mandatory formal wear, he had sided with the majority of those who had written to him wanting the status quo to continue, and Trevor Mallard said that a significant preponderance of members who responded opposed any change to dress standards for the debating chamber.

He said that having considered those views, he concluded that no change in current standards was warranted. Business attire, including a jacket and tie for men, continued to be the required dress standard.

But it’s not about ties or culture because whether a person wears a tie or not, it should have no bearing on a persons ability to work, and Rawiri Waititi looks quite respectable, very appropriate and smart, and is still classed as formal dress and expresses his culture.

And since when did wearing a tie make that person a better politician? It doesn’t.

Does wearing a tie help you put your point across in a debate? It doesn’t, and it’s an outdated concept – it’s all to do with image and nothing more, and as long as MPs are clothed properly, there should be no pressure on wearing ties.

Neckties are a ludicrous concept and they serve no end goal, and it’s utterly bizarre that a piece of clothing seems to maketh the man, and members of parliament who threw their toys out of their pram just because he wasn’t wearing a necktie just smacks the old boy’s club trying anything that will discredit an outsider.

GESTAPO-LIKE Press Officer

Labour Leader Sir Keir Starmer paid a visit to Basildon, Essex, so that he could discuss regeneration plans of the town centre.

But when a Gestapo like Press Officer approached a man, we’ll call him Mr X filming in Basildon Town Centre, the Press Officer said that he could not film. Mr X said that he was a free man and that he was the public, and that he had rights as a British citizen, and that they could not encroach on them.

The Press Officer said that if Mr X wanted to do an interview, but Mr X replied that he wasn’t looking to do an interview, and when the Press Officer asked where Mr X was going to put the footage, Mr X said it was none of his business.

The Press Officer said that they have a press office that requires people to be accredited, in which Mr X said that they didn’t have to be accredited, and the Press Officer said that they did, but Mr X said that he didn’t need to be accredited because he was free.

The Press Officer said that he was a Press Officer and that he could tell Mr X that they did require him to be accredited.

Mr X asked the Press Officer who he worked for, in which the Press Officer said the Labour Party.

The man said: “Really, so what you really mean is you’re a communist”, and that he didn’t like what Mr X was doing.

Mr X said that the Press Officer had no power over him, he could do what he wanted and he didn’t have to ask for his permission.

The Press Officer then said he was asking Mr X what he was doing and Mr X replied that it was none of his business.

Again the Press Officer asked what Mr X was doing, in which Mr X asked the Press Officer if he’d been to the doctors lately, and when was the last time he’d made love to his wife, in which the Press Officer said it wasn’t relevant and Mr X said well then he could see where he was coming from, and the Press Officer said it was his job.

Mr X said that his job had nothing to do with him, and that they had nothing to do with each other, and that the Press Officer had no power over him and then told him to go away.

Mr X then said that he’d been cordial with the Press Officer, but that when Mr X poked his nose into his business he didn’t like it, so why was he poking his nose into his? And Mr X said that he was going to take his video and do what he wanted with it and that there was nothing the Press Officer could do about it.

The Press Officer then said that any interviews he wanted to do… and Mr X butted in and said he didn’t want to do an interview and that he wasn’t interested in interviewing communists.

The Press Officer then left the man alone and another man came over to Mr X and presented himself as the Protection Officer, saying that he knew the man’s rights but that he had a job to do, and that clearly he wanted to video Sir Keir Starmer which he couldn’t prevent him from doing.

Mr X then said it was pure opportunity, and that he didn’t know that Sir Keir Starmer was going to be there and then Mr X moved away slightly and continued recording.

Sir Keir Starmer was being filmed outside hairstylists called ‘Ministry’ which is located near the centre of Basildon Town Centre, where Sir Keir Starmer was inside, although from the outside it couldn’t be seen what was going on in there – possibly he was having a haircut, although not sure why the shop was even open as we’re in lockdown.

Finally, Sir Keir Starmer emerged from the shop with his assembly of Gestapo like protection team and accredited reporters following them where they took a tour around the town centre.

Police Officer Punches Worker During COVID Foray

Shocking video footage appears to show a police officer punching a cafe worker during a raid.

Greater Manchester Police said it’s investigating after the clip was widely shared on social media.

It happened as the police reacted to an allegation that 100 people were inside a cafe in Burnage yesterday afternoon.

Police said it happened while they were arresting a 38-year-old man on suspicion of assault and resisting arrest.

The video, which has been widely circulated on social media, shows a man being arrested by two police officers, and a struggle takes place before the footage appears to show a male police officer punch the suspect in the face.

Onlookers could be heard yelling ‘get your hands off him,’ whilst another said, ‘A police officer has just punched him in the face.’ A further altercation appears to take place before the male suspect was restrained by two officers from Greater Manchester Police. The man remains in custody for questioning.

Greater Manchester Police said they’re aware of the footage circulating online and are continuing to evaluate the circumstances of the event.

A spokesperson said that police were responding to reports of non-compliance with COVID-19 restrictions by a cafe in Burnage Lane in Manchester.

The spokesperson said that officers attended and in line with procedure, endeavoured to engage with individuals and disband attendees, but that this resulted in an officer being assaulted.

The force said that one of their officers sustained injuries during the altercation but didn’t need hospital treatment.

Police were called to the cafe in Burnage Lane shortly after noon, to reports that the venue had been flouting coronavirus lockdown rules. Police issued 14 fixed penalty notices.

Greater Manchester Police haven’t confirmed the name of the cafe, but a news outlet understood that Kate & Luc Cafe Restaurant was involved.

The proprietors of the cafe have posted regularly on their Facebook page about remaining open despite the current lockdown rules.

Pictures taken at the scene also show police officers inside the cafe, and a witness said that they’d been open for takeaways but that recently they’d seen people sitting inside and the witness said that there were around 50 or 60 people inside and outside, and that no one was wearing a mask, and that it was like they were protesting against the lockdown.

However, regardless if it’s 100 or 10 people, the cafe should not be open. Although it’s understandable that people need to work, especially if they’re self-employed market traders and times are tough, but the longer rules are ignored the longer this will go on.

But it’s odd how the police are keen to respond to COVID crimes, yet they take ages to respond to other offences.

Irrelevant of what occurred, the police don’t have a right to strike a member of the public, they have a right to detain and defend themselves if needed, but as there were other officers there, I don’t honestly believe the police officer that struck the man can justify his defence and should be dismissed immediately.

After all, if that had been a council worker that had punched the average joe, he would have been detained and taken away by the police, so why should it be any different for Mr Policeman? And not only did he take one punch but he went after the man to try and take another punch and the other officers were just standing around while eyewitnesses were yelling that the officer struck the man, and if you look carefully the police officer who was gunning for the man was not wearing his mask over his face.

Tom Jones Wondered He Would Make It After His Wife’s Death

The Welsh singer tied the knot with his childhood sweetheart, Melinda Woodward, known as Lady Linda when they were 16 years old. They had son Mark about a month later and Linda raised him, while Sir Tom Jones was away on tour.

Their marriage endured the pressure of innumerable affairs from the start, including the claim that he slept with up to 250 women a year at the height of his fame.

Despite cheating on his wife with scores of women, Sir Tom Jones always said that Linda was his soulmate and that from the day they met at school in Treforest, Pontypridd, he claimed to have known she was the one for him.

Sir Tom described her as the most important thing in his life and that she was an unbelievable woman, but a decade later, Linda departed this world after being diagnosed with terminal lung cancer at 75.

Her passing was about one-year before Sir Tom and Linda would have marked their 60th wedding anniversary.

Sir Tom Jones revealed he struggled to accept that his wife was gone during an interview with a news outlet in 2019 and that he blamed himself for her death and wished he’d forced her to see doctors sooner than she did.

Thankfully, Sir Tom Jones eventually realised that there was nothing he could have done to prevent her death, and he said that he couldn’t have done anything.

Sir Tom Jones explained it was too late when doctors realised she had cancer, and he continued that there was not a lot he could do.

In 2017, Sir Tom Jones revealed he could not sleep and wondered whether he would survive his heartache, and there were days when he felt like he couldn’t get up because he just didn’t want to get out of bed.

Sir Tom Jones sought counselling and was told he wouldn’t make it if he didn’t return to his normal life, and he recalls her saying to him he had to carry on and that if he didn’t, he would die.

He said that he thought of his family, his son, his daughter and his grandchildren.

Sir Tom Jones explained that his wife Linda’s favourite song haunted him – Bob Dylan’s 1989 song ‘What Good Am I?’

However, he couldn’t have been that devoted. She must have been so humiliated when she found out that her husband had cheated. How many times? And played her good and proper.

He wasn’t devoted to her; he slept with not just one but hundreds, and it was a bit too late to toss himself in the grave after she was gone – must have a guilty conscience!

It sounds extremely sad for her, and it seems that she was his only comfort blanket. Makes you wonder how she must have felt, and of course, wealth is not a comfort, though it doesn’t seem like it she who was ostentatious, for instance, fancy cars and designer clothes. He had the money, the power et cetera and any normal marriage wouldn’t have survived such betrayal.

And it seems like she was an uncomplicated lady who spent little money and grew old gracefully. And as for Sir Tom Jones, what was all the drama about? Thrusting his pensioner hips – sex bomb, I don’t think so, but then again, what’s one’s meat and is another one’s poison.

His wife could have walked, but she stayed, and she must have thought life was easier with him than without him, and she garnered the indulgences that his celebrity lifestyle provided her, and who’s to say that she never played him at his own game.

‘Judge, You Is So Gorgeous’

A Florida man facing an attempted robbery charge is making headlines after philandering with the judge presiding over his case.

Demetrius Lewis appeared before Broward County Judge Tabitha Blackmon via a Zoom hearing on Thursday on charges he attempted to break into a Fort Lauderdale home as three children slept inside.

A video of Demetrius Lewis hitting on Tabitha Blackmon has since gone viral on social media, having been viewed more than one million times.

‘How you doin’, how you doin’?’ Demetrius Lewis asks in the clip as he appears on the Zoom call. The accused felon then notices Tabitha Blackmon on his screen and states: ‘Judge, you is so gorgeous…I just have to tell you, you’re gorgeous.’

Demetrius Lewis then proceeds with his compliments, telling Tabitha Blackmon that he loves her.

Tabitha Blackmon appears somewhat amused by the remarks before she responds: ‘Alright Mr Lewis. Flattery will get you everywhere. But maybe not here.’

Indeed, Demetrius Lewis’s proclamations of affection didn’t do much to impress the judge, who ordered him held on $5,000 bond, and according to a news outlet, Demetrius Lewis had previously spent four years in jail.

He was reportedly freed in 2019 after serving time for aggravated battery with a lethal weapon, but while his flirting failed to grant him freedom, it left social media users entertained. I mean, what did he have to lose at this point?

Last year, Tabitha Blackmon was appointed to Florida’s Seventeenth Judicial Circuit’s County by Governor Ron DeSantis. She previously served as a prosecutor for the State Attorney’s Office, and as an attorney for the Attorney General’s Office.

You’ve got to admit, Demetrius Lewis has become a bit of a legend – give him a round of applause for at least trying, and because, let’s face it, Tabitha is gorgeous! And love is found in the most simple of thing – it’s not just about looks or class, or how much money one might have.

And she loved the compliment, just look at that smile!

However, he may have taken the word court a little too literally with his courtship.

‘Joker’ Of Nottingham Jailed After Dropping Bowling Ball On Council Worker’s Head

A prolific Nottingham criminal known for walking around the city costumed as the Joker has been jailed after dropping a bowling ball on a council worker’s head, leaving them with permanent brain damage.

Damien Hammond was high on the drug Mamba when he targeted his prey who was collecting a discarded TV left in the street.

The 31-year-old roared from his flat that he wanted the item before dropping the ball, encased in a pair of jeans, from his first-floor window 14 feet up.

He was found guilty of causing grievous bodily harm with intent following a trial at Nottingham Crown Court. Judge James Sampson condemned him to 16 years in jail.

Judge James Sampson said that he was a volatile person who would almost certainly offend again, before labelling the crime a wicked act.

The incident, on 30 December 2019, left the council worker with a fractured skull and caused a brain haemorrhage.

After it happened, Hammond, of Strelley Road in the city’s Bilborough area, engaged in a two-hour standoff with police threatening to kill everyone who attempted to get into his flat.

After eventually setting fire to himself, he jumped out of the window, where he was detained by police.

Prosecutors said Hammond, who has a history of mental health problems, had performed more than 100 aggressions over the last 19 years dating back to when he was only 12. Among them was a 12-month prison sentence for wounding in 2016.

In a statement issued after the sentencing, Detective Constable Sarah Gregg, of Nottinghamshire Police said that evidence demonstrated that when he dropped the heavy bowling ball from his first-floor window, he was completely aware that the council workers were under the windows and he meant to hurt one of them.

This man should never be freed from jail, he has mental health problems and still won’t be reformed even after 16 years, and he probably won’t even do the entire sentence. He should have been stuck in Broadmoor and told that it’s Gotham City.

Although what was the point of putting this man in prison, he has severe mental health problems and should have been put in a psychiatric unit. I’m sure there are a plethora of mental health facilities where he wouldn’t present a danger to himself or others.

A secure hospital would have been more beneficial and they didn’t even have to give a release date, he could have been in there indefinitely, and why was he not locked up permanently years ago?

This man had 100 offences under his belt in 19 years. He wandered around like he was the Joker and nobody saw this as a red flag. Typical Government who concluded that putting them out on the streets – what was it called, oh yes, care in the community, but there was no care in the community, they were just left to get on with it.

This man has been having mental health problems all his life, yet no one noticed, which means our Government have let him down and the poor council worker who is now brain-damaged for the rest of his life. Who else are the Government going to let down – everyone!

Why was this man even on the streets, he should have been institutionalised a long time ago, but then our Government did away with places like this because it took too much of their time and effort, and of course, far too much money. It was easier to unleash the beast and let them get on with it in the hope that nobody got hurt in the process.

Ten people Stabbed Leaving One Dead In Croydon Bloodbath

A man was stabbed to death with two others fighting for their life after ten separate stabbings in just over two hours in Croydon.

Police said they had no information that the attacks were connected despite the attacks occurring just over a square mile of each other in south London.

Police were called to reports of two males with stab injuries at 8.08 pm to Wisbeach Road, Croydon.

One male was taken to hospital before they arrived in a non-life-threatening condition but another man was pronounced dead by paramedics.

Police didn’t reveal an age for the victim but said his family were aware of his death, and as of yet, there have been no arrests.

Earlier police responded to a stabbing at Chapman Road, Croydon at 6.56 pm. Police found a man, whose condition was assessed as not life-threatening later in hospital.

Minutes later police were called to a south London hospital at 7.15 pm after four males, all aged in their 20s, came in suffering from numerous stab and slash injuries. One of those men is at this time in a life-threatening condition.

Police were summoned back to a south London hospital after two more men self presented with stab injuries at 8.51 pm. One of the male’s condition worsened and is now fighting for his life.

In the last attack of a bloody evening in Croydon, a male was detained on suspicion of GBH at 9.12 pm in Dingwall Road.

The victim too has been arrested and his condition is not considered to be life-threatening.

Detectives put in place a special stop and search order to stop any further carnage on the streets of south London, and Detective Superintendent Nicky Arrowsmith said that sadly they’d seen several unnecessary and abhorrent violent altercations, including one that’s tragically resulted in a loss of life.

He said that officers would be on patrol throughout the night across the South Area Command Unit, with additional resources from the Violent Crime Taskforce and Territorial Support Group deployed to prevent any further violence, and he urged anyone who had any information that could help the police to assist them as they worked to investigate the events to speak to them as soon as possible.

He maintained that stopping violent crime in London continued to be a top priority for everyone in the Metropolitan Police Service and that they have dedicated resources working to prevent violence in all its forms, day and night and were using all possible tactics and powers.

Croydon used to be such a magnificent place to live, but now it’s drastically changed, it’s now a foreign town, quite literally and in such a mess and it’s a disgrace.

It’s good to have diversity, which has happened all over most of Britain, but not when you don’t feel safe in your hometown.

Nowhere is like it was before, but then our successive government have permitted this to happen, but now it’s time to get real because like so many places, the government has imported the third world for cheap labour and they subsequently brought their violent cultures from their war-torn countries with them, but we mustn’t overlook that crimes are committed by white British people as well.

As well as gangs that govern the inner cities, with some people being criminal trash, who believe they own it, and this is sad, but don’t get me wrong I have several ethnic and gay friends who are brilliant, but what I can’t stand is criminals and criminality, particularly when there are stabbings, disorder, gangs and drugs!

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started