Eleven Of Barack Obama’s Most Brutal Takedowns Of Donald Trump From His Florida Address

It’s unusual for former presidents to criticise their successors but the 44th POTUS broke from convention to make several derogatory swipes, from criticising Donald Trump’s mismanagement of the coronavirus pandemic to claiming his words embolden mean, cruel, divisive and racist actions – Barack Obama didn’t hold back.

He took a swipe at Donald Trump’s earlier role as The Apprentice host, saying that Donald Trump hadn’t shown any interest in doing the work or helping anybody except himself and his friends or treating the presidency like a reality show to give himself more attention, and then he remarked that the other day, his TV ratings were down.

And then he said that he understood that the President wanted to take full credit for the economy he inherited and no blame for the pandemic that he ignored, but that on a general rule, Donald Trump wasn’t a person who enjoyed taking responsibility for anything and that the job doesn’t work that way, and that tweeting on television doesn’t fix things and that conspiracies don’t make people’s lives better, and he continued that you have to have a strategy and you’ve got to do the work.

Barack Obama criticised Donald Trump for not taking necessary measures to protect himself from the coronavirus, like repeatedly refusing to wear a face mask, and that they were eight months into the pandemic with new cases breaking the records, and that Donald Trump wasn’t going to suddenly protect all the people, and that he can’t even take the necessary measures to safeguard himself and that he doesn’t even acknowledge that there is a problem.

And when talking about Donald Trump’s proposal that drinking bleach could help protect people from the coronavirus, Barack Obama said that perhaps we shouldn’t have had the President get on television and say that if you put some bleach in you, that might clean things up.

The mismanagement would be funny, if not absurd if it didn’t mean people losing their lives or that the economy wasn’t recovering. And on the economy, Barack Obama criticised Donald Trump’s record on the handling of his finances.

He said that Donald Trump likes to claim he built the economy and some people have given him recognition for it. And that he did inherit the longest streak of job growth in American history that they got started, but just like everything else he inherited, he fumbled it.

To be fair, if Donald Trump wasn’t so evil and full of loathing for the minorities, I would actually find him entertaining.

He really should stick to TV shows and stay out of politics because he’s not equipped to run any country and he’s a divider, not a unifier.

And for all those people out there who don’t agree, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. Maybe all those Trump supporters who have children, their children will grow up to be just like Donald Trump, then maybe then and only then they’ll realise what a pathetic specimen of a human being he really is.

Barack Obama’s speech in Florida was awesome, but I just wish everyone could hear it with an open mind, then maybe they wouldn’t vote for Donald Trump.

But of course, just because Barack Obama can articulate in complete sentences doesn’t mean anything, especially when we’re finding out every day how crooked most Government’s are.

How Elderly Paid Price Of Protecting NHS From COVID-19

On the day Boris Johnson was admitted to hospital with COVID 19, Vivien Morrison received a phone call from a doctor at the East Surrey Hospital in Redhill.

Stricken by the virus, her father, Raymond Austin, had taken a decisive turn for the worse.

The spritely grandfather, who still worked as a computer analyst at the age of 82, was not expected to survive the day – his oxygen levels had dropped to 70 per cent rather than the usual healthy levels of at least 94 per cent.

Vivien said she was told by the doctor that her father would not be given intensive care treatment or mechanical ventilation because he ticked too many boxes under the guidelines the hospital was using.

This is called triage and it’s common practice in any health care setting given to numerous patients with limited resources and it’s a practice that’s been around for decades in one form or another.

But the fact is these people needed intensive care and were not being given it, and there’s been a great deal of coronavirus rationing to keep the old and frail away from hospitals, and many elderly people were excluded from hospital and intensive care during the height of the pandemic’s first wave because they kept telling us that it was to stop the NHS from being overrun, yet Nightingale Hospitals were left empty.

This is called culling, euthanasia or genocide, but whatever it’s called, it’s definitely not human behaviour.

Documents were drawn up at the request of Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer. The devised guidelines were called a triage tool, which was later used to prevent many elderly COVID 19 patients from receiving ventilation in intensive care, and one of the documents advised doctors that anyone over the age of 80 years old should be excluded altogether.

Intensive care doctors say the triage criteria set out in the documents, which score for age, frailty and illness, were used in hospitals in Manchester, Liverpool, London, the Midlands and the southeast, but the Department of Health insisted the guidance was never formally published, however, multiple sources say it was widely circulated and used by hospitals and doctors.

And one intensive care doctor described how the triage tool prevented so many elderly patients from being admitted to intensive care in his hospital and that many critical care beds were empty.

Instead, patients were left to die, and NHS data acquired by Insight demonstrated stark differences in the way intensive care was used for various age groups.

Patients over the age of 80 years old made up 60 per cent of the total deaths from the virus, but just 2.5 per cent of the age group that was admitted to hospital were given access to intensive care.

However, many of the small minority of those in that group who did go into intensive care would later be discharged alive, and figures suggest only one out of 9 people who died of coronavirus had been given intensive care treatment.

It also demonstrates that a proportion of over 60-year-olds receiving intensive care treatment halved as the pressure came on during the height of the pandemic, and the new findings undermine claims by Matt Hancock, the Health Secretary, that everyone who needed care was able to get that care, during the first wave.

This led to demands for more honesty about the awful price that was paid to protect the NHS so that lessons could be learnt in a second wave, and as part of a three-month investigation into the government’s handling of the crisis during the lockdown, a news outlet spoke to more than 50 witnesses, including doctors, paramedics, bereaved families, charities, care home workers, politicians and government advisors.

Inquires unearthed proof that a variety of steps was taken which kept people from going into hospital, and in some areas, GPs were asked to identify their frail elderly patients who would be left at home even if they were extremely ill with the virus, and local trusts supplied lists of patients for doctors to consider excluding.

NHS England also issued guidance to health authorities setting out groups of elderly people, including all care home residents and those who had requested not to be resuscitated, who should not ordinarily be conveyed to the hospital without the consent of a senior doctor.

Ambulance and admission teams were told to be more selective about who should be taken into hospital and one paramedic reported visiting case after case where people had died from heart attacks after being left too long to deteriorate in their homes while suffering from the virus.

And care homeowners voiced frustration that their residents were being denied access to the hospital.

One described how eight patients were left to die from the virus in the home before the hospital started admitting his residents again – the five who went to the hospital after that survived.

The disclosures came as Professor Neil Ferguson, whose modelling influenced the decision to lockdown in March, cautioned that the health system would not be able to cope if coronavirus cases continued to grow at the current rate this autumn.

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the British Medical Association said that it was manifestly the case that considerable numbers of patients didn’t receive the care that they needed and that was because the health service didn’t have the resources.

Now we’re stepping into a second crisis without having learned vital, even life-saving lessons.

Conservative MP David Davis, the former Brexit secretary, said the government’s approach had catastrophic consequences for thousands whose lives could have been saved, and he added that the policy appeared to have given the least care to those who needed it most, and it was profoundly unjust that the Government didn’t come clean to the people about this catastrophe.

The Department of Health said that the triage tool was tasked by Chris Whitty and other UK medical directors, and it was said to be part of planning for a worst-case scenario and when it became obvious this would not happen, the guidance was not developed further, therefore was never distributed or implemented.

Professor Stephen Powis, NHS national medical director, issued a statement saying that all patients had been treated equally and he said that the NHS repeatedly instructed staff that no patient who could benefit from treatment should be refused it and that thanks to people following government guidance, even at the height of the pandemic there was no shortage of ventilators and intensive care.

Adele’s Three Simple Changes That Sparked 7 Stone Weight Loss

Adele has been keeping a low profile in recent years, sharing only the rare image of herself with fans on Instagram, but then the star made a jubilant return to TV to host America’s SNL and reveal the results of her lifestyle and fitness overhaul in the process.

The 32-year-old singer showed off her slim figure in a pretty top on the NBC comedy show after transforming her body over the past year.

Emerging from the shadow of her 2019 divorce from charity boss Simon Konecki, Adele is thought to have lost a staggering 7 stone, reportedly describing it as a crazy positive experience to fans, and those close to the star claim it’s transformed her on a personal level as well.

A friend said that there was a lot to do with her weight loss that’s transformed her life, but that it was so much more than that.

Indeed, Adele refused to lose weight for anyone other than herself, but the London born singer first started improving what she ate after the birth of Angelo in 2012, and for the sake of her voice, the first thing she did was ditch her customary 10 cups of sugary tea and waved goodbye to alcohol, cigarettes, caffeine and all spicy, citrusy and tangy foods.

She told Australia’s 60 Minutes of her 2011 vocal haemorrhage. “It’s f***ing boring, but I don’t think you take your voice seriously until you have an accident.” And she admitted that she was terrified all the time that she was going to damage her voice.

In 2016 she shed yet more weight ahead of her tour in a bid to get some stamina, and by 2017 she was thought to have lost more than two stone reportedly due to implementing a second change – The Sirtfood Diet.

The food programme sees slimmers fill up on plant-based foods like kale, buckwheat, green tea and turmeric.

The foods are known as sirtuin activators and are said to influence the way the body processes fat and sugar and controls the appetite in the process.

Green tea and cocoa powder are also on the menu, along with red wine and cheese.

A source told a news outlet that the Sirtfood Diet was all about losing weight and feeling amazing through eating great tasting food and that it was based on extensive research into the power of key plant foods, which when added to your diet turn on fat burning and improve wellbeing.

But let’s face it, Adele could wear a plastic bag and still look fantastic, and why should she be judged on weight loss especially when she has such a remarkable singing talent, and has a stunning, incredible voice and personality.

EU’s Banks To Run Out Of Money In Days

The European Union is poised to offer Japan better access to its markets than the United Kingdom, prompting City supremo Catherine McGuinness to claim Britain’s financial services industry was being overlooked during EU-UK trade talks.

However, Robert Oulds, director of pro Brexit think tank the Bruges Group, has said the bloc’s infantile endeavours to punish the City of London was doomed to fail and any such move would result in the EU’s financial system rapidly running out of cash.

Catherine McGuinness, head of the City of London Corporation’s policy and resource committee, said the deals which Japan has secured with both the EU and the United Kingdom were a model which needed to be replicated elsewhere.

And she claimed that instead, the UK’s financial sector was always being treated like a neglected child during negotiations.

Mr Ould’s told a news outlet that the EU depends on the City of London and that it would be completely self-defeating and he added that such a move would be a definitive example of cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face.

And he continued that they couldn’t do that to themselves.

Not only that, the EU’s financial system would run out of money in days, but Mr Oulds said he wasn’t concerned by any suggestion that the EU was prioritising Japan over the United Kingdom – he said that this was just a negotiating situation and that it demonstrated that they were troubled by Britain’s formidable stance.

In the past, Mr Oulds has been critical of Boris Johnson’s failure to step away from trade negotiations with the EU, but he said it showed Boris Johnson was winning and that he could get something right.

Speaking before International Trade Secretary, Liz Truss signed off on a landmark trade deal with Japan and Ms McGuinness told a news outlet that they indeed wanted the EU to offer them something at least as enterprising as they’re offering Japan.

And that they were closer neighbours and bigger partners and they saw some promising signals about what they might achieve in other regions of the world that they would like to see replicated with their EU counterparts.

Speaking in August, European Commission executive vice president Valdis Dombrovskis, who was at the time its finance commissioner, cautioned regulatory equivalence, whereby City firms gain access to the EU, could still take months to be granted, and he added that some areas would not be in a position to adopt equivalence decisions.

But it seems that they’ve got millions salted away, never to see the light of day, but they don’t want their books audited properly otherwise it would undoubtedly demonstrate how bad a state the EU is in, and the Euro would most probably automatically crumple with some blatant deception going on in a big way.

And it’s a bit like a Ponzi system, all leaning to each other, but like a house of cards, it will all come falling down – perhaps that’s why they want a global reset. But as we leave, this is what the EU will endeavour to do to us, this is why we must tear up the withdrawal agreement and give them nothing.

Because they not only want to level the playing field, they want to control all of our sovereignty and we must not play their game.

Boris Johnson Trashes Target To Decrease Net Migration To Tens Of Thousands

Boris Johnson has ditched the target to decrease net migration to tens of thousands as he cuts the £35,800 salary cap for skilled UK migrants.

The plan, which ditches the aim put forward by Theresa May’s government, was announced in a 507-page rulebook.

Under the new proposal, the cap needed for skilled migrants to remain in the United Kingdom without any time restrictions will be lowered to £25,600.

It comes as Boris Johnson seeks an Australian style points-based immigration system, which will take earnings into account along with a myriad of other factors, and comes into effect from January next year.

The move, which has been confirmed by the Home Office and will be introduced from December 1, was spotted by Oxford University’s Migration Observatory.

The project’s deputy director, Rob McNeill, told a news outlet that they’re acknowledging that the bluntest of all the instruments the Government used to get to that target of tens of thousands has been kicked into touch.

Migration Watch UK’s Chairman, Alp Mehmet, described the move as outrageous, adding that to make matters more ominous, these significant changes are being slinked in through the back door with sparse detail and lack of advanced notice.

It follows figures revealing in August that net migration to the United Kingdom soared to its highest level since the Brexit referendum in 2016 in the build-up to the coronavirus outbreak.

A wave in student numbers, especially from South East Asia, saw 313,000 more people enter the United Kingdom. This was an upsurge on about 92,000 on the figures in March 2019 and the highest level since March 2016, when net migration was calculated at 326,000.

But the figures were likely to be the last to see large numbers of people joining and exiting the United Kingdom, due to the lockdown that came into force at the end of that month.

And according to the ONS report, over the past year, about 715,000 people moved to the United Kingdom and about 403,000 people left the United Kingdom.

Meanwhile, Home Secretary Priti Patel has been wrestling with a surge in migrants crossing the Channel in recent months and some 90 hotels are being used by the Home Office to house migrants being processed, including four-star accommodation under a £4 billion outsourcing contract.

There’s been a surge in the number of migrants arriving in Britain this year, with media stories suggesting that nearly 1,500 people crossed the English Channel in small boats and dinghies in August alone.

And many people have had enough of this Tory Government with so many U-turns, so many blunders and the breaking of International Law – why can’t we just skip to a Labour or Lib Dem Government, so that we can see a transformation, in a good way.

However, we do need a target because we are grossly overcrowded and overstretched, but this Tory Government backstabs the British people at every single opportunity and this will mean that so many more migrants can now come to the United Kingdom if they meet the lower threshold and Boris Johnson seems to be wriggling again.

Perhaps they should evaluate on a need basis because multiple jobs have gone to migrants that were needed by the British people, but more money should be put into training people to fill these jobs.

And they should stop these ridiculous university fees so more can go on to get the qualifications they need. Education is the key.

There’s nothing conservative about this so-called Conservative Government and they’re just self-serving, uncharitable and idiotic and they couldn’t get any more Tory if they tried.

Authority Over Poverty

Basildon Conservative MPs Stephen Metcalfe and Mark Francois voted against a motion to keep free school meals for deprived families and hungry children going throughout the school holidays until Easter 2021.

MP John Baron didn’t bother to turn up, which was wicked beyond belief and these three MPs let Basildon borough down every single day and they were speechless in Westminster.

Luckily for Basildon, the Labour and Independent Councillors who run Basildon Council, slashed salaries to pay for the School Holiday Programme which will provide meals for hungry children during the October half term, Christmas holidays, February half term 2021 and Easter holidays 2021.

But I can’t believe that in 2020 we even have children going hungry in a first world country, and what’s more alarming is we have politicians that condone it and this shouldn’t even be a policy that requires a vote.

It would be intriguing to see what their food and expenses are and where is their humanity? And back in January when Mark Francois wanted some bells ringing for Brexit, it was all hands to the pump, but I suppose feeding children isn’t high enough on his agenda.

And now we can see that it’s mainly the Tory’s that voted against these measures. It’s also the Tory’s who own, finance and influence the poverty porn people read in the right-wing red top papers, and now they should own their decision and acknowledge that there were willing to let children starve.

Yes, the ‘I’m alright Jack’ brigade were paying less tax and that’s all they care about, but those taxes go towards deserving causes like this, but now we have to depend on charity because of the negligence of our Government.

And I hope that locals think about this next time they get to vote for their local representatives and don’t get caught out with their lies and propaganda.

I didn’t expect MP John Baron to vote for it, but he might have at least had the decency to turn up and these Tory MPs for Basildon should hold their heads in shame because they should be fully aware of the deprivation experienced by some people in Basildon.

And I fail to comprehend why people keep voting for this embodiment of the Tory Party when all they’ve done is force the most impoverished constituents of society further and further down.

Labour MPs paid tribute to Marcus Rashford’s burgeoning crusade to end child food poverty, however, the Tory benches voted down Labour’s request for free school meals 1.4 million underprivileged children in England with a £15 a week food voucher during the holidays.

And it seems that Mark Francois didn’t turn up. He’s not been seen or heard from in months, and it appears he voted by proxy and John Baron didn’t register a vote at all.

However, Mark Francois doesn’t have to stress about going hungry – his net worth is estimated to be in the range of about £256,027.00 in 2020, according to the users of vipfaq – this estimated net worth includes stocks, properties and luxury goods such as yachts and private aeroplanes.

This is disgustingly despicable and there’s something quite wrong in society if we vote against a cause like this.

They’re just children and no child should go hungry in the 21st century and I hope they all sleep well with their conscience, but then it seems they simply don’t care, and this is just hypocrisy, given how their meals are expensed and how the taxpayer subsidises their meals and drinks at Westminster bars and restaurants into the millions every year.

How Do Pandemics Usually End?

Ever since the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak, people around the world have been asking the same questions, how and when will the pandemic come to an end?

If only there was a clear cut answer.

Different efforts have been taken across the world to mitigate the impact of the virus.

On 23 March, a national lockdown was executed across the United Kingdom, resulting in businesses closing their doors and members of the public being urged to remain at home as much as possible.

And while the national lockdown has since eased, local lockdowns have been put in position in specific areas across England – this later morphed into the government’s three-tier coronavirus restriction system, introduced in October, in a bid to categorise different postcodes according to virus risk.

Despite the public tolerating these periods of lockdown, the evidence has demonstrated that the outcome was not a long term fix but a short term one, and once society returned to greater levels of socialisation, and schools and universities started again, the number of people hospitalised with COVID 19 returned to levels higher than when Britain first locked down in March.

As a result, it’s reasonable to wonder whether we will stay stuck on this carousel of sporadic lockdowns until a vaccine is available. A scenario which experts, including chief medical officer Chris Witty and Kate Bingham, head of the vaccine task force, estimate could be another 12 months away, and can we look to the past and other pandemics to give us an alternative answer?

The most lethal pandemic in recent history was the H1N1 Spanish flu of 1918, which was calculated to have eradicated at least 50 million people worldwide over two years till 1920.

In 1957, the H2N2 influenza pandemic began, killing about one million people – the 1968 H3N2 flu pandemic came just over a decade later, resulting in a comparable number of casualties, and 2009 marked the appearance of another flu pandemic, this time swine flu, which was calculated to have caused 284,000 deaths.

And while lessons can be taken from past pandemics, it’s crucial to mention the majority were caused by strains of influenza, while COVID 19, a coronavirus, behaves completely differently from flu, and Dr Nathalie MacDermott, NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) academic clinical lecturer at King’s College London, underlines the extraordinary personality of COVID 19.

Dr MacDermott said that this pandemic is unusual, in the sense that we have a pathogen that’s extremely capable of spreading.

It’s highly contagious and highly transferable, and it’s infectious in asymptomatic individuals, and that all these factors make it much harder to control than a lot of other epidemics that we might have encountered more recently.

And it appears to have had a tremendous upswing of support for the Conservative Party, hoorah, and God save the Queen, but with all this sarcasm that’s so thick, you could use it for tile grout, but you can’t beat a good old pandemic to show just how caring the Conservative Party are.

This virus will, of course, work its way through the population, just like all other pandemics – some will die, most will recover completely and life will go on, but what we should do, is refuse to live in fear, but if you are fearful, mask up and stay at home.

And allegedly studies are going on by agencies who are industriously looking for the best ways to coerce the general public into adhering with the COVID mainstream narrative, and if we were in an actual pandemic, would such gimmicks need to be applied?

Furlough Fraudsters Robbed As Much As £3 Billion

According to calculations used by parliament’s spending watchdog in a report into the government’s flagship jobs protection scheme, more than £3 billion might have been robbed in furlough money by criminal gangs and fraudulent employers.

The National Audit Office said there was evidence of substantial levels of furlough fraud from both organised gangs hijacking claims and employers taking money collected on behalf of the staff and NAO said that more money will be lost through staff working hours that they were claiming for.

Meg Hillier, who chairs the public accounts committee said that HMRC has paid out billions of pounds to fraudsters and that most of this has probably gone for good.

HMRC managed to stop tens of thousands of fraudulent claims against the self-employment scheme, but it doesn’t know how many managed to slip through the net.

It also missed chances to find out which companies were robbing cash meant for their staff or forcing them to work while furloughed and evidence of significant furlough fraud will add to concerns over the risks taken by the Government in its economic response to the pandemic.

The NAO said earlier this month that taxpayers face losses of up to £26 billion because of criminal activity and company defaults on its bounce back guaranteed loan scheme for small businesses.

The warning from the NAO over the cost of furlough fraud comes after the Government announced plans to expand and improve its job support scheme for businesses forced into tier 3 lockdown or struggling under tier 2 constraints.

According to data, the furlough scheme has cost the taxpayer more than £41 billion to support the wages of approximately 9.6 million people. While more than £13 billion has been spent on helping cover the earnings of self-employed workers.

NAO found the schemes have been most successful in protecting jobs up to October, but the report said the schemes missed as many as 2.9 million people given a combination of policy decisions and constraints in the tax system that meant they were ineligible.

Of this, about 1.1 million people were robbed of money because of limited data to validate claims or determine eligibility, while approximately 1.6 million were ruled out because most of their income didn’t come from being self-employed or they had trading returns above £50,000 and a further 200,000 were estimated to be ineligible because they were newly self-employed.

The NAO said there were several ways that the scheme was open to misuse. Pointing to initial HMRC calculates that between 5 and 10 per cent would have been lost in fraud and error and if accurate, this would correlate to £2 billion to £3.9 billion founded on payments made by mid-September.

However, societies problems are well summarised by this story – lie, cheat and rob whenever the Government gives out money to people, but when all said and done, we know who the actual thieves are, they’re called the Conservative Party, and criminals and politicians are the same.

Nevertheless, our Government has wasted even more money – all you have to do is look at the track and trace fiasco and this is just all smoke and mirrors to deflect from the underlying root of the problem.

And what’s £3 billion of other people’s money anyway?

If you were to lose £50,000 in a private company you’d get fired, but lose billions as a public servant and nothing happens.

A Crackdown In Ann Arbor

The University of Michigan’s reopening hasn’t gone well, compelling the local government to step in and on Tuesday, local health officials instructed students at the University of Michigan to stay in their quarters, effective immediately, to control an escalating campus outbreak.

Cases and positivity test rates have recently spiked in Ann Arbor, which had essentially sidestepped the worst of the pandemic.

According to Jimena Loveluck, the health officer for Washtenaw Country, which encompasses Ann Arbor and the university said that since October 12, cases associated with the university have comprised 61 per cent of more than 600 confirmed and likely local infections.

University administration said in an emailed statement to students and staff members that most of the cases on the campus could be traced back to small and medium-size groups without proper face coverings and social distancing.

The stay in place order, which applies to all undergraduate students through November 3, has quite a few exceptions.

Students not displaying manifestations of COVID 19 can still attend in-person class, play varsity sports and get medical care. They can also access university dining service and exercise in pairs outdoors.

Health officials say those activities haven’t been problematic and that it was socialising without safeguards that’s fueled the outbreak and Emma Stein, 21, a senior news editor for The Michigan Daily, the student paper, said that during the day, on campus, everyone’s okay and following the rules, but at night and on weekends, they don’t.

Ms Loveluck said that even though the regulations don’t constitute a quarantine, the health department may start using fines for breaches and that was particularly significant in advance of October 31, which was shaping up to be a big party weekend to mark the season’s first home football game against rival Michigan State.

One student told The Detroit Free Press that they’ve needed this for a long time and that right now, they were the university who chose football over the safety and well being of not only the students but every single person who came into contact with them.

In Ann Arbor, students and faculty have criticised the university for its reopening plan, which didn’t include across-the-board testing for asymptomatic students and that other colleges have relied on extensive, compulsory testing to keep cases down, since asymptomatic people are often infectious.

And a few weeks ago, Ms Stein, the senior, drove to an urgent care centre in another town to get a routine test – she and her friends didn’t even think to go through the university health system, and she said that they wouldn’t have qualified so they just drove.

The amusing thing is, our children go to college and universities so that they can learn from other people’s experiences so that they don’t make the same mistakes that someone has already made, but what we learn is that our children are a complete afterthought in all of this, and it just demonstrates that the priority isn’t students, it’s bucks.

And the case demographic rages on. Mass testing to find new cases, but don’t worry about imparting harm to this children and the poor, and this is what happens when you follow Trump virus guidelines.

To Be Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak Must Dare To Be Disliked

Being the frontrunner in the Conservative leadership stakes seldom ends well, yet this is the position that the chancellor Rishi Sunak, dispenser, for now, of vast sums of other people’s money, find himself in.

He’s the favourite to take over at some point as Boris Johnson’s leadership deflates like a soufflé and the Tory tribe starts to consider what to order next from a limited menu.

The chancellor will know that in every leadership contest since MPs plumped for the outsider choice of Margaret Thatcher in 1975, the eventual winner has not been the favourite at the start of the contest, bar one. Boris Johnson was the exception last year, as a favourite who won.

However, it seems that Rishi Sunak will be the next Prime Minister inside a year. That’s unless Priti Patel doesn’t get him and send him to ascension island, but I think Rishi Sunak would have to do some serious damage to become as unpopular as Boris Johnson.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started