New Mask Rules In Pubs Will Be Impossible To Police

Pub managers and punters wrestling with new coronavirus rules which make masks mandatory have cautioned Boris Johnson that enforcement will be difficult.

The Prime Minister has now tightened constraints on the hospitality sector for six months by inflicting a 10 pm curfew across England from Thursday and limiting business exclusively to table service.

Speaking in the House of Commons, he also said face coverings will be compulsory for all staff and patrons unless they’re seated.

The raft of measures was met with an instant backlash from the pub trade which said the devastating curbs would torpedo sales and sink some businesses.

Greg Mulholland, campaign director for the Campaign for Pubs, said that it seemed questionable asking people to wear face masks not yet at a table and that there’s fear that the need to have a mask will put people off going to pubs which could see levels of trade fall even further.

Calling on the Government to deliver financial aid for pubs, he added that the confirmation of a curfew of 10 pm and other constraints for up to six months was crushing for numerous pubs and publicans.

He said, that as it is, most pubs were only getting back on their feet and many were not yet trading profitably and this latest news would make it impossible for some publicans to carry on.

Jake Laing, 30, who manages a pub in Notting Hill, told a news outlet that the movement of people around the pub with a face mask would be hard to police. Emphasizing that he would implement the rules but that it would be a challenge but that they had to do it if they were to stay open.

Speaking to MPs, the Prime Minister stated that from Thursday all pubs, bars and restaurants must operate table service only, besides takeaways, and he continued that together with all hospitality outlets, they must shut at 10 pm.

And that to help the police to implement this rule, Boris Johnson said that means closing, not just calling for last orders and that clarity was essential, and that the same will apply to takeaways, although deliveries could continue thereafter.

Boris Johnson said that he was sorry that this would damage numerous businesses just getting back on their feet, but that they must act to prevent the virus from being transmitted in bars and restaurants.

But maybe these rules are here to bully the populace into thinking that there’s no point leaving their houses, but the fact is if people now need to be off work, the Government shouldn’t be demolishing their livelihood and future pensions, they should be supporting them financially.

It looks like we’re going to be in for a formidable winter, and this is utterly absurd and excessive. You must wear a face mask to step into an establishment, such as a restaurant or cafe, but you can take it off when you sit down to eat and drink – what does this virus know to clear off when we’re eating and drinking?

This is insane and our Government are acting as though this is the bubonic plague and the fate of mankind is at risk, but then all futures are now at risk, not because of COVID 19, but because of the melodramatic overreaction of our politicians in destroying the economy, society and peoples chances in life.

This is getting completely out of hand and there are a bunch of extremely irate and frustrated people including some in the vulnerable group who would prefer to take their chances, rather than be dictated to for the remainder of their time and they feel that Boris Johnson is now causing more harm than good.

Raab Warns Second National Shutdown Is On The Cards

Angry Tory MPs have turned on authoritarian Boris Johnson as he ordered the British people to obey his draconian new coronavirus restrictions or face an economically devastating second national lockdown.

The panicking Prime Minister warned Britons last night they face a long difficult winter of police implemented curbs on their freedoms, saying the alternative was many more families losing loved ones before their time.

In a melodramatic televised speech to the country, Boris Johnson flanked by a Union Jack, said he was extremely, spiritually reluctant to make new impositions or violate anyone’s freedom after unveiling new measures in the House of Commons.

But he said it was essential to reintroduce working from home rules and a swathe of social measures in order to evade a dramatic wave in deaths, overwhelming the NHS and spark a second, economically devastating total lockdown.

The beleaguered premier encountered fire from all sides as he U turned on his push to reopen workplaces. He also encountered taunts for introducing other swingeing new measures including a 10 pm pub curfew and £200 penalties for mask rule breakers in England, with the Army potentially drafted in to assist police, in the face of a wave of coronavirus infections sweeping the country.

But speaking from Downing Street, he warned that iron laws of geometrical progression are screaming at us from the graphs that we risk numerous more deaths and many more families losing loved ones before their time.

He even lashed out at his critics – Tories and business leaders who fear his restriction will further thrash Britain’s flailing economy, adding that those who say we don’t need this stuff, and that we should leave people to take their own risks. He said that the risks were not our own and that the sad reality of COVID is that someone’s mild cough could be someone else’s death knell.

He continued that as for the suggestion that we should just lock up the elderly and the vulnerable, with all the suffering that would entail, he said that this was just not practical because if they were to let the virus tear through the rest of the population it would inevitably find its way through to the elderly as well and in much more lavish numbers.

Reacting to the Prime Minister’s grim address, Telford MP Lucy Allan questioned on Twitter whether the UK’s collective health was actually at risk and that efforts to tackle COVID should be proportional to the risk and that the virus is a serious threat to certain vulnerable groups.

And she said that we must protect these groups with targeted measures and that shutting down society causes immense damage to health, lives and livelihoods of the entire population.

I can comprehend why people don’t want more constraints and question if some of them are essential but find it hard to comprehend the outbreak of madness over the last couple of days.

And I’ve read many paranoid conspiracy theories from people making outlandish accusations, with some of them believing they have superior knowledge and I understand that the Government only want the public to be alert and to take the spread of this virus extremely seriously, but I still wonder if there’s an odious plan for permanent totalitarianism.

There has been a wide outbreak of the virus in the week up to September 23, with 5 per cent contracted in bars and restaurants. Eight per cent in workplaces, 21 per cent in schools, 45 per cent in care homes, yet children are going to be crammed into overcrowded, poorly ventilated classrooms in the depth of winter.

Then of course it will be home to mum and dad, rather contradicts the work from home plan. Factor in little or no PPE for teaching staff, so invariably no social distancing can be accomplished. Oh, and no testing for staff or children, what could conceivably go wrong this winter?

And I resent being told by this seedy Churchill impersonator that it’s our fault that the infection rate has risen.

Boris Johnson advised people to return back to work, he urged people to eat out. He reopened schools and now all that advise has gone into reverse.

But I didn’t drive to Durham to test my eyesight. I didn’t tell people they were whining too much and I didn’t quarrel with my scientific advisers, but this man seems to be dangerously incompetent and there’s little sign of a coherent plan to deal with this pandemic, so why should we listen to what he says?

Has Sweden beaten coronavirus?

According to an expert, Sweden has defeated coronavirus by refusing to close the country down and achieving herd immunity.

The Scandinavian nation was the only country in Europe not to introduce stringent lockdown measures at the beginning of the pandemic, but scientists think that this may have helped it sidestep a second wave of COVID 19 as it continues to record its lowest number of cases since March, with only 28 infections per 100,000 people.

This figure is less than half of the UK’s own infection rate of 69 per 100,000 people.

Professor Kim Sneppen, an expert in the spread of coronavirus at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, said that Sweden might have defeated the pandemic. He told Denmark’s Politiken newspaper that there was some evidence that the Swedes have built up a degree of immunity to the virus which, along with what else they’re doing to prevent the spread, is enough to contain the disease, and he said that the virus may now have run out of steam.

Sweden was originally criticised at the beginning of the outbreak after recording a spike in its mortality rates which was five times that of Denmark and ten times that of Norway and Finland.

The number of deaths per 24 hours peaked in April at 115 with more than half in care homes, but its seven day average for coronavirus related deaths is now zero.

Sweden’s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, who has become the face of the no lockdown strategy, said in a recent interview that voluntary hygiene measures had been just as effective as complete shutdowns.

Sweden kept schools open for children under 16, prohibited groups of more than 50 people and told over the 70s and vulnerable groups to self isolate.

Shops, bars and restaurants remained open throughout the pandemic and the wearing of masks had not been advised by the Government and he said that the rapidly declining cases they’ve seen in Sweden is another indication that you can get the number of cases down quite a lot in a country without having a complete lockdown.

Tegnell added that deaths are not so closely connected to the number of cases you have in a country, stating that the death rate was more closely linked to whether older people were being infected and how well the health system could manage. And he said that these things would influence mortality a lot more than the actual spread of the disease.

Well done to Sweden, but Sweden has only 10,099,265 people living in a huge country and they have a lot of one-person households and practice social distancing et cetera -they’re also not a moaning abundance of self-entitled whingers.

All these lockdowns will crumple the economy and more people will starve to death. So, at the moment it’s a balancing act.

Sweden did have social distancing from the start but the Swedes do what they like, unlike a big part of UK society, and the Swedes seem to have a completely separate mentality to the remainder of the world.

And it seems that Boris Johnson and his circus troupe learnt absolutely nothing from Sweden. Instead, Boris continues to panic and take facile, draconian measures, while they run the British economy into the ground, which has obliterated the morale and mental health of a nation.

In short, our Government have persisted in making all the wrong decisions and have brought themselves into disrepute and some people out there might think that they don’t actually care.

Sweden, of course, had the survival of the fittest mindset and had enough faith in their people to do what needed to be done, but England made it political and told everyone to pick a side and that’s where it really went wrong.

Boris Johnson Hits Reverse

Boris Johnson has unveiled a major crackdown on normal life in a bid to stop a second surge of the coronavirus.

He will drop his back to work drive, announce constraints on socialising and levy a 10 pm curfew on bars and restaurants from Thursday.

Pubs and other outlets will be permitted to serve seated patrons only and drinkers will be prohibited from assembling in groups.

Chief medical officer Chris Whitty said it was crucial to break unnecessary links between households.

Northern Ireland announced a prohibition on families visiting other households and there was conjecture England could follow suit.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock warned COVID transmission tended to be in social settings – people coming round to your house, or you going out and socialising.

The limitation on guests at weddings may also be cut from the present limit of 30 and a senior Government source last night acknowledged the Prime Minister’s back to work drive would be paused after scientific advisers warned that workplace transmission was a problem.

In July, Boris Johnson urged staff to go back to work if they could in a bid to stop city centres becoming ghost towns, but a source told a news outlet that workers will be urged to work from home if they can during the coming weeks.

Ministers for the Cabinet Office Michael Gove confirmed the U-turn as he told Sky News that there was going to be a shift in emphasis and one of the things that they were going to highlight, that if it was feasible for people to work from home then they would urge them to do so.

The Prime Minister was reportedly ready to shut down the whole hospitality sector after the Health Secretary Matt Hancock, Michael Gove and the Government’s scientists started pushing hard for more draconian measures, but it’s understood that the Cabinet’s economic hawks, guided by Chancellor Rishi Sunak hauled him back from that threshold.

The constraints have divided the Cabinet, with Rishi Sunak and Business Secretary Alok Sharma both warning about the possible impact on the economy, but a senior Government source insisted all ministers accepted the move was needed to bring the R rate, which calculates how quickly the disease is circulating, back under control.

The source said the aim is to cause maximum damage to the R and minimum damage to the economy and that unless they act now, there will be greater economic damage later on.

Businesses and schools will be permitted to stay open, with Government sources insisting the measures don’t amount to a second lockdown, but the prospect of a 10 pm curfew has sparked outrage from the hospitality sector with the UK Hospitality group describing it as another crushing disappointment amid worries it will lead to a wave of unregulated events and house parties.

So, here we go again – it’s like a recall back into the 1980s when pubs had limited hours and it was difficult then to purchase beer and to take it away. What this Government should be doing is treating people like grown-ups, and apprehend those that misbehave.

But it also makes you wonder if Rishi Sunak’s Eat out to Help out has caused this in part, and now that Boris Johnson’s having this crackdown, does this include all MP’s or are they excused?

And it seems that having suffered COVID 19 Boris Johnson seems terrified to run this country. Sweden appears to have the right idea because we can’t keep shutting people away when so many more are dying of cancer, heart problems and depression.

But it seems that the British Government want to suppress our freedoms and I really don’t know how Boris Johnson has the brass nerve when his cabinet ministers don’t know how to follow the rules either.

And if you think about it logically, this virus derived from a country where people have worn masks for decades, so how do you explain that? Unless, of course, the masks cause illnesses and disease.

There is so much chaos and contradictory guidance it’s incredible, and I respect that as the situation alters so must the direction, but it seems that people just can’t keep up with the changing guidance.

And I fail to see how a 10 pm curfew will actually do anything. It might lower the numbers in late-night drinking places but does the virus actually know that it has to go home by 10 pm?

People will still come into close contact all day long transmitting the virus and when all said and done, there’s really no way of getting rid of this virus apart from a vaccine or simply letting the virus burn out by itself.

Once upon a time nations set sail across the seas to far off lands filled with unknown dangers and we left our mark, now all we’ll have to put on our gravestone is: “Here lies the United Kingdom – we followed the science”.

All Camouflage Has Gone – Harry And Meghan Have No Royal Future

For more than a year, it’s been the millstone around Prince Harry’s neck, a gold plated slice of taxpayers’ generosity that stank of privilege and entitlement, but to Harry and Meghan, the £2.4 million of public money, our money, that was lavished on remodelling Frogmore Cottage, only for it to be shattered and abandoned along with the rest of their royal lives, symbolised something far more intrinsic.

He saw it as a chain that shackled them to the land of his birth, hampering their efforts to be really free of the Royal Family and crucially of their media critics and in his eyes, the money was not a loan from a generous nation pleased to be helping this young royal couple find its feet after their joyous wedding, but instead a stick with which to beat them.

So, paying back every penny to the public purse, having previously offered to do so at the rate of £18,000 a month, a deal of such indulgence, it would have taken them 11 years to reimburse the deficit, which is highly significant.

In the short term, it’s designed to muffle the drumbeat of criticism to which they perceive they are subject, but will it actually end what they complain of as unjustified public interest in their new lives?

And surely by embarking on such a high profile life in the entertainment capital of the world, where every resource is choreographed for maximum publicity, such a move presents more questions than it answers?

It can be no coincidence that this amazing gesture comes only days after it was announced that the couple had signed a production deal with Netflix, calculated to be worth £75 million.

And many will wonder if this payment to the Sovereign Grant was part of the first instalment of that incredible deal, but while the royal officials were digesting the implications, another equally bold announcement was being released by the Duke and Duchess.

A source close to the couple confirmed that they were no longer receiving financial aid from Harry’s father, the Prince of Wales, either from the Duchy of Cornwall or his private income.

This, too, marks a fork in the road for Harry and Meghan, although insiders suggest they may already have received the total amount of the stipend they expected from Charles for this year anyhow.

What it does do, however, is signal that their divorce from Britain is permanent, while removing any facade that they might still have a future function in the Royal Family. Harry could, of course, have sidestepped this whole tragic saga before it ever became a problem, and with a calculated fortune of £20 million inherited from his mother’s estate and trust funds from the Queen Mother, he could have afforded to pay for the renovation himself.

The Queen gave them both an extremely run-down cottage and it was an extremely pricey affair that taxpayers had to pay to remodel it. It required a lot of tender loving care and heavy repair to bring it up to standard ahead of the Duke and Duchess moving in.

Perhaps Harry and Meghan breaking away from the Royal Family will give them both a chance to do their own thing and maybe they will be successful, that’s not a bad thing. It will give them both challenges, successes and failures.

That’s the foundation of maturing, as long as they’re willing to learn the hard lessons, but Harry has to realise that to become successful, he needs to be able to get real with people in need, rather than making shallow woke addresses to bored rich folk who would be more than willing to drag him down.

We’ll believe it when we see it, but I hope it happens for them both because it would be such a waste if all he becomes is a highly paid talking head – we’ve seen enough of those in the world.

Downing Street Denies Claims That Boris Johnson Enjoyed A Secret Excursion To Perugia Last Weekend

Downing Street has denied an Italian newspaper’s assertion that Boris Johnson enjoyed a secret jaunt to Perugia last weekend as Brexit and coronavirus gripped the United Kingdom.

La Repubblica cites an official statement from the Umbrian airport dated September 17 which stated that Boris Johnson travelled through in the last few days and a source from San Francesco d’Assisi airport told the newspaper that the Prime Minister landed on Friday, September 11 at 2 pm, but No 10 told the Italian daily that the claim was wrong.

On that Friday, Boris Johnson was met with MPs preparing to rebel on his international lawbreaking Brexit legislation and increasing numbers of coronavirus infections across the United Kingdom.

The Prime Minister and fiancee Carrie Symonds also reportedly baptised son Wilfred that weekend, it was claimed.

Boris Johnson has reportedly journeyed to the airport before to see his friend Evgeny Lebedev, owner of the Evening Standard, at his medieval castle.

Russian born Evgeny Lebedev, whose father is an ex KGB operative, is known for hosting grand bashes for celeb guests at the Castello di Santa Eurasia.

According to one report Boris Johnson worked from Downing Street on the day in question and took part in a Zoom call with 256 Tory MPs on Brexit.

Boris Johnson had attempted to give a patriotic rallying cry to inspire his colleagues to back his controversial plans for the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.

One source said that Boris Johnson’s connection had cut out during the call and when he came back on he quipped that he should probably invest in a super-fast internet.

Last year it was said that Boris Johnson, during his time as Foreign Secretary, had been spotted at Perugia’s airport looking disorganised in last night’s clothes and a fellow passenger told a news outlet that Boris Johnson seemed to be stumbling around and at one point looked as if he might vomit, but there was silence from Boris Johnson’s communications staff when these reports emerged.

Last month, Boris Johnson nominated Mr Lebedev for a life peerage for his services to the media industry and his philanthropic work.

There are no constraints on travel at the moment, so there shouldn’t be an issue with Boris Johnson travelling to wherever he wants to at the moment, the issue seems to be, is that he’s travelling while the Brexit crisis is going on, that’s if he really travelled at all – at the moment, it all seems to be speculation.

The problem is that it could be true or it could be totally bogus, but the fact is many people distrust Boris Johnson enough now to believe that it’s highly doable, but does it actually matter, he’s useless no matter where he’s located, and our part-time Prime Minister is always going AWOL.

However, the masses are just as gullible and if someone said they saw Elvis in a Fish and Chip shop in Leeds, some people might believe that as well – propaganda goes a long way when it comes to Government business.

Someone is telling porkies but if it does turn out to be true, Boris Johnson should resign or the 1922 committee members should take measures to replace him. If this story turns out to be false, then Boris Johnson should sue the newspaper.

EastEnders Celebrities Left Disappointed And Considering Leaving

Eastenders stars have reportedly been left unhappy and even contemplating leaving over extended breaks and pay losses on the soap due to the coronavirus situation and it’s been claimed that due to social distancing measures, fewer cast members can be permitted on the set at the same time.

And while the celebrities are taking an extended break, they will not be paid during their time off.

It comes after Jake Wood left the BBC One soap last week after 15 years playing the baddie Max Branning and in August it was announced that Ian Beale star Adam Woodyatt was taking an extended break.

However, an Eastender spokesperson told a media outlet that it’s not uncommon in soaps for the actors to have breaks for storyline reasons or other projects. However, these are always planned months in advance and no discussions have taken place about operating a period of extended breaks.

It comes after a source told a news outlet that casts had been called by producers over the weeks and told that, going forward, they would be operating a period of extended breaks for some.

It could see up to a third of the cast off at any one time on a loose rotation system but actors will not be paid when they are off and they’re not happy and some are contemplating leaving.

And social distancing means that fewer people can be on set at one time and they have to save money during difficult financial times and now Eastenders star Jake Wood quit the soap after 15 years of playing fiend Max Branning.

The actor, 48, confirmed he would be departing Albert Square at the end of the year, but added that bosses will be leaving the door open for his return.

Lacey Turner is also reportedly set to take a long break from Eastenders just as her character Stacey Fowler has returned to Albert Square.

The actress, 32, will be back on screens after she went on maternity leave for a year with her daughter Dusty, now fourteen months old, but according to a news outlet, Lacey’s return will be a short one as she will be off the soap again by the end of the year, with bosses now planning her temporary departure.

An insider said that Lacey will be taking a break and top bosses agreed to give her some time off from the show.

However, with some of the actors leaving, will anybody really notice or care? And admittedly it’s precarious work even on a good day and some have been in the show for such a long time, now they’ve been typecast, so is there anything else they can do?

When coronavirus was announced months ago, the public was led to believe by the Government, that neither the businesses nor their staff would lose out financially. Since then, all we’ve been reading is that everyone except the conglomerates has been losing out, especially their staff – yet another pledge made, but then broken.

So, some of these actors are contemplating leaving, so where will they be working next? And we know that actors usually live in a world of their own, but even they must have noticed what’s going on.

The problem here is that they’re not being paid in some cases or have had their wages slashed which is right as they’re not shooting.

I don’t believe any of them are asking for pity but if you’re not getting paid but still tied to the soap contractually then you may be unable to take other work or projects to supplement that loss of revenue.

Also if other work or projects come up, they might not be able to due to scheduling issues and whether you work on a soap or work in a supermarket you want to be working and earning money and there seems to be a tremendous problem in this country with people feeling that anyone who earns a certain amount of money somehow shouldn’t grumble when their paychecks cease.

Although it would be wrong of us to tell these celebrities to shut up and take it on the chin because clearly, they all want to be working and have the right to do so if things aren’t going well where they are.

Boris Johnson Is Planning An Advertising Campaign To Advise Teachers And Parents About COVID Symptoms

It’s been revealed that the Prime Minister is planning an advertising campaign to inform teachers and parents about coronavirus symptoms.

The Government has encountered intense backlash over the test and trace system which has seen those needing tests sent hundreds of miles and told to join lengthy queues at some testing centres while others stand empty.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has called on Health Secretary Matt Hancock to apologise for what has transpired, but Matt Hancock told Sophy Ridge on Sky News that he would not.

He said no and that he firmly and emphatically supports his team who have done an outstanding job at building capacity.

As the testing debate persists, the Government’s ad campaign will hope to stop pupils with runny noses and colds being sent home and told to get a test and according to a news outlet, Boris Johnson’s aides are working on the public information campaign in a bid to prevent the system being swamped.

The newspaper also claims rationing plans for coronavirus tests in England will prioritise teachers.

The testing chaos has been blamed on a mad rush by parents needlessly seeking COVID tests for children with common colds.

Generally, coughs and colds spike every September when children head back to the classroom and become even more common during the winter, but a No 10 source told a news outlet that the deluge in demand for tests was due in part by people not understanding when they should and shouldn’t get a test.

The source said, for example, whole classes of children and their families have been sent for tests after one positive case, which is mad and that loads of children get the sniffles in the autumn, the difference now is they’re all being kept off school and trying to get coronavirus tests.

Public health experts echoed the sentiments and Linda Bauld, Professor of Public Health at the University of Edinburgh, said the same pattern of over-testing was evident in Scotland, where schools returned about a fortnight before those south of the border.

And that it was evident from the Scottish example that a bunch of unnecessary tests were taken up by parents for their children and the same thing has occurred in England and Wales.

Dido Harding, head of NHS Test and Trace, informed MPs that there had been a significantly marked upsurge in the number of young children being tested, a doubling of children under 17 being tested, with even more considerable peaks in those aged five to nine years old and according to some reports, more than 300 schools had sent either some or all students home after reported or suspected cases.

However, if the Government had half a brain they would realise that children will feign a cough or a cold at school. Now there will be numerous children who will endeavour to tell their parents they have COVID when all they had was a cold so they can get out of going to school when they should be told under no uncertain terms to get up and go to school and to stop the silliness, and it’s just a pity that the Government, teachers and parents don’t have simple common sense.

However, this is another manipulation and this is not a symptom that the Government should be advertising, but then I don’t suppose anyone would take the virus that seriously, not that many do anyhow.

If a child has a sore throat and a cough it doesn’t immediately mean that they have coronavirus, but our Government are making us totally irrational and it’s making numerous people panic. This Government started this fire and the media fanned the flames and they frightened people to death, so it’s no wonder people are rushing out for tests.

As if Brexit And Coronavirus Were Not Enough

Boris Johnson’s close friends and colleagues say the subdued and sullen Prime Minister is stressing and whining about money after his earnings shrank from over £350,000 a year down to £150,000.

And those in contact with Boris Johnson claim the embattled premier, usually sociable and spirited, has distress etched on his face, as he flounders to cope with ever-growing political and personal pressures.

The Prime Minister is understood to loathe being at the helm in stormy seas as his longstanding tendency for dark moods is heightened by coronavirus and Brexit, which threaten to jeopardise his standing at the next General Election.

And although this is a tidy sum of money for most, Boris Johnson is whining about supporting four of his six children through university and coming out the other side of a costly divorce from his ex-wife Marina Wheeler.

His use of the flat he shares with fiancee Carrie Symonds, with whom he had newborn baby Wilfred this year, above No 11 is taxed as a benefit in kind, while he also has to pay for food sent up from the Downing Street kitchen.

The couple are even presented with a bill by the Government if they want to host friends at Boris Johnson’s Chequers country retreat and all of this has left the poorly served Prime Minister in a bad mood, whining about money and stressing about being able to afford a nanny as he invests all his time and energy into governing.

One friend told a media outlet that Boris, like other Prime Ministers, is very poorly served. He doesn’t have a housekeeper, he has a single cleaner and they’re worried about being able to afford a nanny.

He’s stuck in the flat and Downing Street and it isn’t a nice place to live. It’s not like the Élysée or the White House where you can get away from it because they’re so big.

And Senior Conservatives who meet regularly with the Prime Minister said the twin crisis of coronavirus and Brexit have knocked his confidence and usual positiveness.

Boris Johnson has encountered criticism domestically and on the world stage for pursuing madman legislation that would defy the Withdrawal Agreement brokered with the EU last year, breaking international law in the process.

And he was forced on Wednesday to agree to table an amendment to the Internal Market Bill, giving MPs a vote before the Government can use the powers related to Northern Ireland which would breach the treaty.

Top lawyer Amal Clooney slammed Boris Johnson’s lamentable Brexit plans as she resigned as a UK Government spokesperson on media freedom.

The top human rights expert and wife of actor George Clooney revealed she was leaving the high profile position over Boris Johnson’s intention to bring in new legislation that would override part of the Withdrawal Agreement he signed last year.

She said the UK’s actions threatened to encourage authoritarian governments that infringe international law with devastating consequences all over the world and Mrs Clooney said she was disappointed to have to leave because she’d always been proud of the UK’s reputation as a champion of the international legal order, and of the culture of fair play for which it’s known.

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is attempting to balance coronavirus hawks in favour of a second national lockdown with doves, including Chancellor Rishi Sunak, who understands that Britain can’t afford another economic shutdown.

Boris Johnson is now terrified by Government scientists with warnings of hundreds of daily coronavirus deaths within weeks as they told the terrified Prime Minister that there is no alternative to a second national lockdown.

He’s now threatening to intensify coronavirus constraints as early as Tuesday as he accuses the British public for the rise in cases, despite his regurgitated pleas for people to get back to their offices and eat out in a bid to rejuvenate Britain’s dying economy.

The Prime Minister is looking to ditch his Rule of Six and introduce fortnight-long circuit breakers nationwide for six months, following claims that it was inevitable that a second wave would hit the country.

A Government source told a media outlet that the United Kingdom could face short, sharp lockdowns for the next six months until a coronavirus vaccine is ready and a No 10 spokesman would not deny the claim when a media outlet approached the Prime Minister’s office for comment.

Irrespective of people’s bitterness towards Boris Johnson, the position of Prime Minister was always a more favourably paid position because it’s the most responsible position in the country, and whatever we might think of him personally, he’s now getting way less than other people such as footballers et cetera and now Boris Johnson has a train wreck to deal with and I doubt Labour would have done any better.

But let’s face it, if he had a nanny he’d be looking at getting his leg over again, so this is saving him lots of banknotes and what is it that the Tories usually say about the impoverished – can’t afford children, keep it in your pants – don’t expect any support or sympathy if you can’t.

He’s been sacked from various positions for lies and misdemeanours, has a cluster of children by numerous women, plus numerous affairs and mistresses – this is not Prime Minister material, this is Jeremy Kyle material, so is anyone that shocked on how inadequately he’s performing so far?

And did he not save any money while making all that cash, that’s not a good trait for a leader, not having planned for a future change in circumstances.

For £150,000 I’d work twice as hard as Boris Johnson, make sense when I talk, take 80 per cent less time off and keep my promises – you know like a normal person would – VOTE me!

Woman Bites Off Man’s Testicle

A woman claims she bit off a man’s testicle as he attempted to rape her.

Video footage of the woman presenting her side of the story has gone viral as she claims she was in bed with another man at the time when the assailant, who was an ex-boyfriend, turned up.

Police are investigating the woman’s claim after the alleged attempted rape took place in the municipality of Miguel Alves, in the northern Brazilian state of Piaui, in the early hours of September 5.

The man was taken to hospital for treatment and discharged the same day.

The police, upon learning of the case, located the man and took him in for questioning and a medical examination.

In the video, the woman said that he struck her and started to assault her. The other man was pulling him to get him off her but he would not go and he was pulling her hair.

She added that he was unclothed on top of the bed and she struck him and that’s when he pulled her hair, so she went down to his ball sack and bit because women aren’t as strong as men, you understand? So, she went for his weak spot and bit him.

The local media have revealed that the pair were neighbours and had a prior relationship. However, the man has argued that the attack was unprovoked and it’s been reported that police have heard both parties and witnesses, and are awaiting the results of the man’s medical examination. This will determine whether just one or both of the suspects will be indicted.

Well, that will certainly teach him a lesson and it must have been extremely traumatising for her, but watch her get incarcerated for protecting herself and not the man.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started