THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Would you aspire to become a political leader? Or to be a delegate of the United Kingdom, or any nation come to that. Well, numerous kids were taken out of classrooms and this is what they had to say about it, as they assembled in a library with such frankness, though their purity gave loads of insight.

They were questioned what they would do if they were Prime Minister…

One girl stated she would probably help more with the environment, pollution and assist the homeless. Another said he would probably end people fighting, like conflicts and get families together.

Another boy stated he needed to get the best out of Britain because he announced we are a great nation and that we justify having great laws. Another boy said he would improve the environment and make dwellings more affordable for poor people.

A young girl stated she would desire to make the world kinder so there’s like no fighting and that we are all one huge happy family. They further stated that they would make certain that everyone had their rights in the country.

One young boy announced he would seek to sort out the economic pressure and eliminate any difficulties that are around the community, like all the homelessness, which is a severe dilemma.

The children were highly interested and were really excited, they appeared to like being able to do something innovative and they further liked the new experience, however, they were just drawn in by some of the concerns at the moment and they liked to understand how it influences them and their parents and families in their geographical area, that was of vast importance to them.

But out the mouth of babes comes honesty, not the distortions that we get from our government, and we all know that children, in particular, are great at make-believe, but it appears even less so than the lying that the government are apparently doing now.

Even though children aren’t able to vote, the decisions made at the election will have a significant bearing on the lives of all kids across the country.

Private academies get much better results than state institutions, therefore wouldn’t it be appropriate for the various types of academies to interchange educators every now and then, so that all pupils have the same opportunities to achieve.

There could be a web page set up where kids can have their say in the country. The government should listen to the children since they have some good ideas.

If cuts have to be made, they shouldn’t be in education. Young people in this country are the future and the government must keep up a world-class education. If we are to compete, especially in science and technology, we must fund in these fields correctly.

The government are not directly involved with young people and Theresa May should take the opportunity to see young people doing positive things, rather than simply hearing negative stuff about them from the media. Young people would like their viewpoints to be heard more and further would like more help for the hard working single mothers out there.

The financial recovery should be the government’s priority, however, they should further spare consideration for the education system since cuts in education will never permit society to progress. Smaller classroom sizes, equalisation of opportunity and a curriculum shouldn’t extinguish a student’s creativity.

We want our children to grow up in a society where the balance of their parents bank account does not determine their experience at school and electoral competitors touring schools throughout election season is not sufficient to prove that they care, these children demand to know that they’re prepared to listen and do something about what they have learned.

There should be more funding for youth clubs which need to be more locally accessible. Youth clubs keep young people off the streets and out of trouble. Youth clubs are great because they can promote skills there that they can practice later in life.

As humans, we work better collectively, and if schools worked collaboratively, rather than in opposition to each other, they function better. It is about the quality of teaching rather than statistics.

 

British armed forces should be yanked out of Afghanistan, and the UK government should support the Afghan people politically. Using the military only makes the situation worse.

Education requires more student management. We further require women’s education to encourage young women to cultivate their ambitions and to be furnished for the trials of difference that lie ahead. You only have to look at how many women MPs there are to understand that the path into the future will not be simple.

We should have more police to patrol a wider array of areas and more community centres with more facilities so that there is more for youngsters to do, perhaps then there would be fewer crimes and kids should have more liberty to say how they feel.

Teaching and teachers should be fun, in our school’s children are taught how to learn, not what to learn.

There are not enough playgrounds or areas to play sport, and it’s frustrating for children and teenagers to find areas to hang out. This drives teenagers to do bad things, and the government should pay more consideration to children and teenagers and spend money on them because they are the future.

It’s refreshing to know that there are a number of people out there that have the same anxieties about this country, and politicians should address children and teenagers with more interest, and it’s excellent to see a group of young people making, for the most part, more insight on education than any of the three principal parties.

It’s especially delightful to see young people being involved and interested in their future and the community around them. Children are, believe it or not, quite able to talk about a designated issue when asked. This notion that numerous people appear to have of young people being incapable of concentrating on anything past youth culture is, quite frankly, untrue.

There is commitment and dedication from educators, possibly not at all schools, but there is from many, and these comments came from the children and young people themselves. Children and young people take an interest in their community, country and their own futures if they are given the abilities, means and further the possibilities at home and further at school to do so.

When children have situations taught to them, why can’t they come to a perfectly rational and reasonable determination about change? They need to grow, be involved and practice skills they require to put into actuality once they are old enough to vote, campaign and take charge for their futures.

Numerous schools do this and do it competently, regardless of national newspapers, general elections and go-getter media moments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don’t usually cite people’s work, however, I was listening to some material from George Carlin, who’s work I utterly admire, because it’s all about telling the truth, but not only telling the truth, but making comedy out of it and making it into parody and basically making people laugh.

I like to ridicule, it’s one of my better qualities, plausibly more so than writing and I do it with a passion, so when I was listening to some of George Carlin’s material, I couldn’t help but chuckle and thought that I would bestow some of it with the public.

We watch tv and we watch the advertisements or the shopping channel which attempt to market their commodities, they tell us that their merchandises have quality, value and style. That if you buy on tv it’s convenient and purports to be moderately affordable.

They tell us that we will be saving money and that they’re a friendly service with named brands, with easy terms and affordable prices, and not only that, you’ll get a money back guarantee. Perhaps even free shipment, or a free home trial – No money, that’s also not a problem, order now, pay later, but you have to order whilst the stocks last.

Then they inform you that all purchases are final, and you’ll have to give it approximately 6 weeks before they ship out your goods, though some items won’t get to you, and some items will require assembling. Buy by mail or purchase by phone, try it in your home, try it in your vehicle.

So, come on in for a free presentation and a free consultation with their affable proficient team. They’re friendly and expert sales agents will encourage you to make a selection that’s exactly right for you and just fitting for your means.

However don’t forget to pick up your free bonus, a traditional and expensive custom created high-quality premium selected pocket torch. Additionally, if you act quickly they will include an added complimentary gift, a vintage and fancy custom produced high-quality selected leather style wallet with detachable key chain and pencil holder.

It’s their way of saying thank you, and if you’re not entirely satisfied, you pay nothing. You can simply return the unused portion for a full refund, no questions asked, it’s their way of saying thank you, keep our free gift. Really, it’s their way of saying, lean over, just a little further and let us stab this huge jackhammer into your anus a little bit farther.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The tagline on Hallel’s Facebook Timeline reads, “I am Hallel. I have Down Syndrome. I am not Down Syndrome. I am Hallel.” It wasn’t fundamentally Markowitz’s vision for Hallel to become a model, even though she did recognise it as a means toward normalising global feedback and recognition of people with disabilities.

And now Markowitz’s idea has become a realisation since Hallel and many other Israeli children with disabilities and special needs recently modelled for the Summer 2017 collection of Select Fashion, an Israeli children’s clothing label.

Select Fashion companioned with Beyachad, an Israeli organisation pushing for inclusion for people with disabilities. This seems like it’s the inception of something unique which should put a lead to a business criterion in which companies would employ people with special needs as models, just like anybody else.

 

Select Fashion wasn’t Markowitz’s first victory including models with special needs in an ad campaign. Her pilot was with Skye Green, a regional boutique designer for teens, which used a model with special needs in a video campaign.

It was a triumph, but it was a boutique, and they wanted something that was widespread. Markowitz hadn’t gone the modelling route for her three older children, but with the birth of Hallel, she decided that the world encompassing her required some knowledge with respect to recognising people with special needs.

When Hallel was born, she understood, like any parent with a child with special needs, that her child was incredible, however, the world was the obstacle. It’s about stupidity and intolerance and people who never confront people with special needs.

As Hallel’s parent, she knew that a huge part of the problem was that people with special needs are not in public focus. It came on faster for her, perhaps since she was really in harmony with the media. The most important position to have perceptibility is the media, whether it’s adverts or commercials or the performance world on the TV or PC, people with special needs are not there.

At around the time of Hallel’s birth, models with special needs were first being used in campaigns in the United States and England, a normalisation that Markowitz perceived as remarkably important.

Consequently, she put up the Facebook page but got a huge empty acknowledgement from businesses she contacted. One modelling company did contract Hallel, and she was selected to perform on one episode of a local show.

However, she didn’t have the opportunity or strength to launch it any further.

 

However, she made contact with inclusion organisation Beyachad, Count Me In, which then contracted public relations agent Chen Krupnik to pursue the modelling angle, and ultimately made the association with Select Fashion.

She’s still got hopes for Hallel, and for anybody else with special needs or disabilities. Her desire is to see an enormous billboard on the Ayalon.

It’s every little girl’s dream to have her name up on a billboard, it’s an illustration of who they are. These kids are not abnormal, strange or odd and they are not the excrement of society and they unquestionably do not require anybody’s approval.

From the minute they are born, they are exceptional like all children however their chances are not perceived in a favourable light but this parent has embraced the day and has celebrated her daughter’s ability to do something great with her life, where others would find fault.

Jane McCready is used to her 10-year-old son being gawped at as if he were a sideshow oddity but she will never be reconciled to it. Children are one thing, they don’t know any better. But these are grown-ups. They look at her son and their mouths drop open and they simply gawk.

 

Johnny has severe autism and learning disabilities. He looks like any other kid, but he behaves strangely, for instance, he might sit banging two playthings collectively and he sometimes makes unusual sounds.

Particularly when he was younger, he might have a huge meltdown, at the supermarket checkout. His mother would feel 300 pairs of eyes on them, all watching them, all judging them for being disruptive and challenging.

The saddest day was when, at the swimming pool, another mother drew her child away from Johnny as if he had something catching.

 

This is what they are up against when you have a kid with special needs, other people tend not to be particularly sympathetic. Which is especially awful because these parents have already got so much on their plate as it is.

The odds appear stacked against them, and if people just gave them a little scope and assistance, it would go a long way. But the opposite is more often the problem. They’re struggling to begin with, then people beat them down further.

They make assumptions, they treat the child as though he or she is dangerous or badly behaved. It’s soul crushing. It’s so sad, so difficult to deal with, and she has friends with special needs children who don’t even take them out any more.

The fact is that it’s amazingly difficult to have a kid with a special need such as ADHD or autism. In some instances, it’s a 24/7 job and to have to suffer the unfairness of others on top of that is just too much.

There’s a strong feeling that how we look after our most defenceless tells us a lot about our culture and you don’t get much more vulnerable than kids with special needs. So we must up our act a bit, as a community.

 

To that end, Mumsnet launched This is My Child, a campaign directed at getting us all to reflect a little more about the realities of life for families with kids who have special needs and to check our behaviour respectively.

A little help goes a long way. One time Johnny was melting down and this lady approached his mother. She thought she was going to complain, you get people who say things like, all he needs is a good slap.

When she said ‘What can I do to help, dear?’ Johnny’s mother could have hugged her. It must have taken some courage for her to do it, but it made such a difference to her. She felt somebody was on her side rather than the normal wall of resentment.

 

Claire Champkin, 40, who lives in Twickenham, Surrey, knows exactly how Jane feels. She says the greatest frustration about life with six-year-old Toby is the cynical opinions of others. Her son has moderate-to-severe autism and is mainly non-verbal, but dealing with the realities of his condition pale next to dispensing with the unkindness she meets from strangers who determine for themselves that he is just a badly behaved kid with an imperfect mother.

One day they were in the park, and a father who was sitting on a bench shifted his glasses down to the end of his nose and sat there gawking at Toby in apparent condemnation.

What do people think gives them the license to act that way? And the twist is, they believe they’re making a determination on that child’s bad conduct.

Amanda Marlow, 43, who lives in Milton Keynes, says she has endured by developing a skin so thick she questions anyone’s condemnation could penetrate it. She has four children, twins Elizabeth and James, 13, Oliver, seven, and Alex, six. Elizabeth has Treacher Collins syndrome, which causes craniofacial abnormalities, James has Asperger’s syndrome and Alex has severe autism.

What she would like people to realise, is that these are her children. This is her life. It’s not a bed of roses, but she strives to make the best of every day. What would be helpful is if people were patient and thoughtful once in a while, and gave them a little space.

These mothers are dealing with problems that most people haven’t got a clue about, and it’s interfering when they get somebody coming up to them saying, he needs a clip round the ear when one of them has an outburst.

The problem is, people gawk and it’s not right to stare, not continuously anyhow. It’s okay to look and then recognise that child has a disability, then all they have to do is look elsewhere, but they don’t have to keep gawping.

People don’t have to direct interrogations about what’s wrong with the child either, it’s really not their concern, alternatively, a kind word would not go astray and some help.

It’s not a tragedy, that a child has a disability. They don’t want pity, they’re quite happy to get on with their lives. They dislike people calling them exceptional or presuming they somehow have special qualities that allow them to deal with this.

They cope because they have to, and that’s what anybody would do. Calling them exceptional or alluding to their excellent qualities makes them different, sets them apart, and they don’t want that at all. What is further troublesome to numerous parents is when other people take it on themselves to reassure them that all will be well. They get that all the time.

The other thing they frequently say is how beautiful and adorable the child is as if that is somehow inconsistent with a disability. The people they value most are those who simply treat them as they would any other family.

It’s nice when people meet them and they attempt to engage with the child, simply as they would any other child. What they don’t need is sympathy, because they’re hugely proud of their children and all they have accomplished. These children the centre of their world and the idea that people exhibit sympathy is just so misplaced.

There are about 770,000 disabled kids in the United Kingdom and, their parents warrant better. A lot of it is about building knowledge about the reality of their situation and breaking some of the various myths.

 

There’s a myth that some disorders, such as autism and ADHD, are a popular justification for bad behaviour and bad parenting. Wrong, these conditions are genuine and disabling and it is disturbing that the parents and families of those with them are branded.

Another myth is that kids with disabilities are given the help they require. In fact, there is little help there, they have to struggle for everything they’re given and how long it takes even to get their child’s condition diagnosed.

Another myth is that language around disability doesn’t matter. You get a lot of people who use words like retard and mong and for some reason, that’s permitted, whilst language that’s discriminatory or sexist or homophobic unquestionably wouldn’t be.

It’s hurtful to families where there are disabilities, and now we must clamp down on it. You can’t always recognise when somebody has a disability. Respond thoughtfully, not judgmentally.

Don’t make hypotheses about a child’s potential based on a label. People with disabilities have a spectrum of abilities, just like anybody else. If people appear to be struggling, ask: “How can I help?” or “What do you need?”

Responding “at least it’s not cancer” is not helpful. If there is a child with a disability in your child’s class, invite him or her over to a playdate, or include him or her on the birthday party list. Too many parents of children with special needs children say their children miss out on peer pursuits.

And one last time, don’t gawk. Really. Just don’t.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What do people want? Some want a revolution in this country, to screw over the media, screw the mainstream and some are declaring they don’t deserve to be there, that we should be fighting, not for government and not for the mainstream who serve as spokesmen for the nefarious government.

They are declaring that people require a revolution in this country and if it was any other nation there would have been a revolution. The people have observed how the mainstream media have reacted and responded and for two years they have pursued and demonised Jeremy Corbyn and they stated he was unelectable and there was no likelihood of this man ever becoming Prime Minister and they built that narrative and people truly accepted that drivel for a while but what this referendum has proved is that people have become immune, they are now in bulletproof vests to the media and other billionaires like Rupert Murdock and to all those other simpletons, they have become immune to that shite, that is a vote of faith, not in terms of Jeremy Corbyn but to Theresa May but it further stands up to the mainstream media.

Now people are reacting to the media with their warped and twisted lies and it’s contemptible because they destroy any hope of people like Jeremy Corbyn getting into government because they influence people’s minds into believing the repeated distortions and then people like Jeremy get disregarded.

 

They have made Jeremy Corbyn look irrelevant and quite mediocre and what a lot of nonsense it all is, simply a string of inaccuracies but we need to understand the bigger picture and be mindful of the distortions that the mainstream media are reporting to us.

They seem to believe that people are ignorant and have no sense of what is going on around them, but they’re wrong since more people are becoming well-informed rather than ill-informed.

Unmistakably, some people believe that they want to believe and they are the people that have no purpose, they are the messengers, the errand boy with all their beliefs and opinions that labour and tell you that we should heed to the mainstream media.

The media is wilting but of course, there will constantly be people out there that will tell you that you’re wrong and they will flourish on this misinformation and they will mock you and sneer because those people further spread untruths.

Distortions are like a ripple in a pond, you toss a pebble and the waves grow, like the distortions and then we have a gathering of dishonesty. Distance yourself from those distortions and ultimately, you will just recognise the truth.

You can run away from the truth, but you can’t hide from it and it’s a burden for some when they finally get found out but scoundrel’s ultimately do get caught out like the hounds that they are. It’s a matter of morals and it’s trying when you realise that the mainstream media have no morals at all.

Theresa May is dropping next year’s Queen’s Speech so she can cling to power for an entire two years. It implies the Tories can evade questionable Commons majorities which could overthrow the Prime Minister until after Brexit.

 

Theresa May is now dismantling this Wednesday’s Queen’s Speech of proposals she put forward in her election manifesto. Therefore the ageing will not presently lose their homes if they require care or their triple lock on pensions or winter fuel subsidies.

It further indicates Theresa May can focus on two years of Brexit discussions starting Monday with less risk of being driven out of Number 10 on her ear. A two-year parliamentary agenda preferably than the normal one further indicates MPs and peers will get more freedom to discuss Brexit.

Now that Theresa May has lost her Commons majority she’ll require the assistance of MPs and peers from additional individuals to get Brexit through. The United Kingdom will use the next two years planning for our withdrawal from the EU. This will need substantial amounts of enactment.

They will need to create the broadest possible consensus for their Brexit policies and that involves giving Parliament the best amount of time to examine those proposals. It’s Theresa May’s means of clinging to power.

However, it’s not very strong and stable. There’s nothing more constitutionally stable than the Queen’s Speech.

A Great Repeal Bill to assign all EU legislation to British control will be uncovered on Wednesday along with proposals to manage immigration. The Queen is being forced to abstain Ascot races because Theresa May adjourned the Queen’s Speech from Monday whilst she worked to arbitrate a settlement with 10 Northern Ireland DUP MPs.

Presently she can pencil the event in her diary for next year without any worry it will be rubbed out. David Cameron was the last Prime Minister to delete a Queen’s Speech so Parliament could remain in assembly for two years.

That was during the alliance with the Lib Dems in 2011. However, he had two years worth of enactment to put through. Theresa May now has hardly enough to last a few a months.

 

Brexit Secretary David Davis will announce to French President Emmanuel Macron, don’t attempt to prevent us leaving the EU. David Davis will be in Brussels to initiate two years of discussions with the EU on the terms of Britain’s departure.

Last week President Macron told Theresa May that Brits could, however, change their thoughts about Brexit and the opportunity was open to remaining in the EU. However, Mr Davis will convey a definite message tomorrow that the determination to go has been presented and will not be modified.

There should be no uncertainty. We are leaving the EU. And presumably leaving gives us the possibility of forming a brilliant innovative prospect for the United Kingdom, free to regulate our borders, establish our own laws and do what autonomous monarch nations do.

 

David Davis will have his first formal encounter with EU chief arbitrator Michel Barnier to flog out a structure for the talks. On Wednesday the Queen’s Speech at the state opening of the new Parliament will include proposals for the Great Repeal Bill.

This will shift all EU legislation into UK legislation on the day of Brexit. The plan then is to alter those we want to switch gradually in a manner that could take years.

However, with no majority, Theresa May will struggle to get her Bill through the Commons unchanged. The Prime Minister will further uncover strategies to restraint immigration. Now the hard work starts, where a deal has to be obtained and that serves for all sectors of the United Kingdom, and allows us to become a really global Britain.

The discussions will be tough, but I’m certain they will address them in a productive way. But if the Tories think it’s going to be a smooth ride throughout Brexit then they are existing in a fool’s utopia.

The people of the United Kingdom have given enough to satisfy the dreams of right-wing Tories and they must make sure that we are all going to be better off and not worse off when agreements are concluded.

There are numerous people who can’t see Theresa May serving that long, the dilemma with the Tories is if they get rid of her now, then they truly are in a dilemma, looks like the party is falling apart at the seams.

Theresa May really has no remorse and she is prepared to get into bed with the DUP, risking a return to the struggles in Northern Ireland, simply so she can cling to power.

There are no limits this cruel, savage woman will not go to for her own gain. Theresa May is just a dangerous narcissist with a grossly over-inflated personality who does not give a damn about anybody else but herself, unquestionably not the people of this country.

We are already a laughing stock throughout the world, let alone Europe, and Theresa May will not be satisfied until she has isolated the United Kingdom. The country is already on its knees and she will continue to wreak devastation until we are completely destructed.

The woman is a disgrace, and she must do the honourable thing and step down, but then she doesn’t know the definition of the word Honour!

Why doesn’t she simply make herself Queen, and be done with it? Actually, that is effectively what she is doing.

Theresa May is weak and worthless along with her divided party, it’s time to ship them to the dustbin of history before they destroy any more innocent people and she has no majority therefore not actually democratically chosen, and she is planning dodgy transactions and withdrawing the Queen’s address and votes to hang on, that is desperation.

Theresa May is useless and nasty. She didn’t manage to counter terror attacks and decreased service workers. She wants invasive prying into private communications and is politically a dead woman walking and we should expect political discussions to be wobbly.

It’s astounding how Tory voters are suddenly authorities on constitutions. Theresa May is in a lot of trouble since she can’t barter a manifesto position with Ministers and MP’s of her own party.

 

She has struggled to negotiate with the DUP 10 and she wants to dodge a Queen’s speech next year which is there to tell us all the government’s plans for a year in parliament. This woman can’t be in charge of the agreements, it’s absurd, she could not even have a meal with the EU representative pre-election without the floodgates of madness going up.

They are talking about staying in for another two years, is this at all conceivable? Hopefully, they will be gone in the next two weeks, if not before but then, who will be next? They are unpredictable and disorganised, all created by a party endeavouring to mend and cover its own wounds and divisions.

Whilst doing so they have talked of the good of the country. For the good of the country, they should stop drudging around, down tools and invite another election.

This woman truly is becoming a dictator. In the real world, people would be fired for such ineptitude, it’s time for Theresa May to surrender quietly.

It’s typical Tory dismissal and it’s time to face reality. Theresa May has limited support from the people, limited support from the EU and more importantly, limited support from inside her own party. It’s time for her to do the honourable thing and retire with whatever dignity she has left.

She’s defeated. Her own party want her gone but can’t cut her loose. The people want her gone. The Tory party are paralysed. Her government is in disorder, yet she still clings on. We don’t have a chosen government, winning means you can build a government on your own, and Theresa May won’t last long.

She should accept that she’s not actually doing a magnificent job at being Prime Minister, she is not relatable to people and she is not reliable. She is making obscure decisions and making rushed decisions that are not feasible or viable.

Theresa May appears to believe that she’s marvellous and successful at governing the country but as she’s already demonstrated, she’s not. We require somebody who is motivated and firm in their choice making concerning terrorists, our NHS and education but also somebody who can truly encourage and assist every class of people, poor, wealthy and in the middle also somebody who is ready to support the homeless too.

We want somebody with empathy but also has magnificent leadership and somebody that the people completely trust, Theresa May has lost all of that already.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twenty firefighters rushed to a 24-storey inferno, endangering their lives to rescue an expected 600 trapped, with rubble coming down on them. Police used riot shields to divert the rubble, and following 13 hours they were still struggling.

Crews using breathing devices and extensive duration breathing equipment were operating in very challenging and really tough conditions to save people and to bring this extreme blaze under restraint.

Multiple people have been hurt, others were still going in, they are true HERO’S.

In the early hours of the morning, a tremendous inferno ripped through Grenfell Tower in London. As others ran out, the fire service moved in. They’ve all been heroes, and firefighters are seemingly the closest thing we’ll ever have to superheroes.

It’s about time the Tories raised the 1% pay cap and paid these fearless people what they merit.

They are our genuine Super Duper Heros here on earth, and where would we be without them?

These courageous men and women warrant as big a pay growth as ever. The Government need to dangle their heads in humiliation for diminishing their numbers, shutting fire services and cutting their subsidies, this is a shocking lesson for them to learn.

Fire teams are so selfless and heroic, they merit commemorations, each one of them.

It’s not simply firefighters who must be honoured, it’s all of our services that preserve lives on an everyday basis that is the foundation of our country. We have a culture in the United Kingdom that swells with pride and confirms that we are a society that holds together in times of adversity.

They are the true superheroes. Skip all those reality starlets and so-called superstars, but those other people who battle on our part every day, those are the people we and our kids should be looking up to.

These are the people that we should be applauding for risking their lives on a daily basis, but this shouldn’t just be directed at simply firefighters and we should say well done to all the emergency aids involved in this incident, the ambulance workers, police and everyone that was involved, this is when teamwork all comes together.

These are some of the emergency aids that are being screwed over by the government supposedly governing this country. These emergency aids are balls of steel and hearts of gold.

True warriors don’t wear capes or have super powers and they make London proud to have people like that saving lives every day.

Therefore, to all of our multi-millionaire football Super Stars and celebrities, how about each of them bestow a week’s wages to these true HEROES who have worked flat out, it’s only a thought.

It’s remarkable how many people are discriminating, stating that firefighters are overcompensated, underworked, idle and unproductive and some of those remarks coming from those that should have known better and normally from people with no idea of what the job is like and it’s satisfying to see some positivity for a change.

Firefighters seldom get enough appreciation for the astounding job they all do, but they have done an astounding job, as always!

This should make us all immensely proud, but it is also upsetting as these heroes have had reductions to their pensions, the number of jobs accessible, the number of actual fire engines per station and they are still 100% prepared to endanger their lives to protect others and they should be treated with the reverence that they deserve, not only from us but by politicians too.

 

As children we adored individuals like Spiderman, X-men and Superman to name a few, but they are not our real heroes, our heroes are the emergency assistance that struggles on our part on a scorching day, carrying fire protecting gear, which is as heavy as shite, with some of them having probably been on a shift for 24 hours, and these courageous men and women warrant everything.

It takes a unique class of hero, to race into a blazing structure to protect a complete stranger, these people are not, and never could be paid enough, they should be compensated more than the douches who sit sleeping in Parliament, that make the cuts to our services.

Nonetheless, we mustn’t disregard the Muslims who were awake for Ramadan, who knocked on everybody’s doors to warn them of the situation. They are our heroes too, by protecting others in a very helpful way, with no concern but to protect those in need in a time of emergency.

Any government that opposes frontline services in regard to manpower, wages, and all these excellent people that we require to keep us protected, a government who does this is not fit to govern. It’s about time the Government realised our firefighting and nursing heroes and began giving them the pay and conditions they merit.

All firefighters put their lives at jeopardy knowing they have their own families at home, to them it’s their job but to the people, they’re heroes and government goofballs are assembled on their posterior in parliament on 100k+ a year and these firefighters tackle death every single day for a third of this wage but I’m certain everyone is speculating the same.

They should liquidate all the simpletons from so-called committees and substitute them with people who know what they are doing. Like the normal people who have been encouraging to organise things.

They have more understanding and have done more than any councillor, MP or trivial board members have done in many years.

When you look at the nerve of some young footballers that are being given millions for being able to boot a football around and then see firefighters facing what they were doing you understand that we actually are in Alice in Wonderland world, who would you sooner do without?

Theresa May said ‘Let’s get to work’, it doesn’t truly parallel what those firefighters and the people in the community did to preserve lives and what they did only has one thought in mind, placing the people before themselves.

They did this willingly and without thinking, not to gain notoriety but to protect people in need and when something as dreadful as this occurs people put their individual disagreements to one side and it doesn’t matter what language we speak, when there is something as pressing as the loss of life going on, we all speak the same language.

 

Footage surfaced of police changing clothes amid the horrific assaults that took place on London Bridge leaving seven dead and 59 wounded.

The police were supposed to be changing into protective attire, but posts on social communications channels are implying it was the sign of a fraudulent flag.

The intimidation plane was reduced to severe following the Manchester assaults at the Ariana Grande performance, however, following the recent assaults in London Bridge it is assumed that the intimidation plane will be put back to critical.

Various Twitter users are inferring the assault was a fictitious flag following Prime Minister Theresa May’s proposal for international control of the internet.

Theresa May stated that although the London and Manchester assaults were not related, they were fired by the free stream of information.

Theresa May announced that they can’t let this ideology the safe place it needs to develop, but that is exactly what the internet, and the large businesses that give Internet-based services provide.

So presently she aspires to operate with allied democratic government’s to reach international treaties that govern cyberspace to stop the extent of die-hard and terrorism preparation.

She is apparently considerably insane, since internet or not they will still be able to function, only not via the internet, but they will nevertheless endure and just as strongly as before.

Theresa May further announced that they must do all they can at home to decrease the perils of extremism online.

Well, unless they intend on taking everyone offline and doing away with the internet completely, I see that it’s going to make very little difference. In fact, it will just make them more determined!

The IRA had a pretty powerful network and were smart enough to spread their beliefs within Irish towns throughout the world without the internet and we were strong enough to stop them. It seems this is simply Theresa Mays justification to spy on everybody despite their ideas.

Many are insinuating that the assault was a false flag intended to manipulate public sentiment into pursuing a specific agenda. If this was a false flag, it would have various principal purposes. One would have been to cancel the general election and the second would have been a valid ground to announce martial law. The third would have been to harvest assistance for war attacks in Muslim nations.

Literally hours following the attacks took place, online petitions were already requesting for the UK General Elections to be cancelled.

The so-called calls for the election to be cancelled appear to have been inspired by online social media trolls and appear to be entirely profitable to those in government that have something to lose.

Following the Manchester suicide attack almost 4 weeks ago, there was the renewal of terror attacks and that is breeding complacency within the people, in Europe most severely. It is not unusual now for attacks killing dozens to be overlooked inside a week of the event.

The news feeds are awash in distraction, and of course, sometimes these events themselves serve as diversions.

Europe is getting used to assaults like this. They have to because we are never going to be able to entirely obliterate this.

Attitude is fairly symbolic of the European victim-culture mindset. Many in Europe appear to appreciate a constant routine of self-flagellation and countless centuries of the feudal servant system will do that to a civilisation.

 

The British still pay taxes to support a royal family and the results of the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom might deceive those in America into believing that the British are turning over a brand-new leaf in terms of freedom and conservative-like values.

 

There is a deep underlying force to preserve sovereignty of the British monarchy, the British individual has all but rejected any hope of their own individual freedom and self-determination.

In mainland Europe, the self-loathing native-born subject has grown into a bit of a mainstay and has been exploited pretty favourably by the globalist establishment. In particular, the great worry amongst predominantly liberal Europeans is a return to the nationalist enthusiasm that they think generated the growth of Nazism and the Third Reich.

It is this weakness of association with the Nazi legacy that has left Europe weak to manipulation from the other end of the political spectrum.

It is further this mindset that enabled globalists to forcibly infuse millions of Muslim immigrants through open border policies and refugee policies into EU countries without proper vetting methods. The preponderance of Europeans that saw the policy as stupid and dangerous were hesitant to say anything for fear that they would be identified as agitators.

The biggest menace is not just the conditioning of a society to accept cultural aggression without assimilation. Neither is the biggest threat the adjustment of the people in the face of widespread terror assaults.

The pinnacle menace is what will unavoidably come next, the indifference of a country in the wake of incremental martial law and the end of personal freedom.

This past week, a string of three Muslim men hit walkers with a white van, then appeared brandishing hunting blades in a rampage through a packed London night spot. This is just one attack in a steady stream that has tormented Europe ever since the Cloward-Piven agenda of Muslim relocation that allowed millions of emigrants into the EU’s borders.

The vaporous ISIS terror organisation has since declared responsibility.

In answer, Prime Minister Theresa May has said that enough is enough, and necessitated a review of the United Kingdom’s counter-terrorism policy. London police have been directed to change to new tactical situations, guarding streets massively armed and using surveillance helicopters with the help of special forces units.

Theresa May stated that we should do even more to limit the liberty and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough proof to know they present a threat, but not enough ammunition to prosecute them in full in court, and if human rights legislation get in the way of doing these things, she will amend those laws to make certain they can do them.

The deployment of above 5000 British troops at vital locations by Theresa May is all part of a plan founded in 2015 called “Operation Temperer”. The plan calls for the deployment of troops to the UK border in response to extreme terrorist threats.

Basically, it is a martial law program that acts incrementally, rather than overtly. Once executed, Temperer would be tough to change. As UK military chiefs warned when the operation was publicly disclosed, troops would possibly not be drawn back after engagement except if the terror threat was subdued, leaving the interpretation of the threat level open for rather broad interpretation.

Operation Temperer is presently in full sway as police forces demand military support. The prime minister has obliged, replacing officers in many places with military units on watch. Therefore, is this martial law? Perhaps not quite, but it is damn close to the line, and this is how oppression is generally achieved, not all at once, but a stepping stone at a time.

Theresa May introduced Temperer steps following the Manchester bombing, and they do not appear to have done much to disrupt the latest assault in London. The UK general elections for government are simply for one day, and it is highly probable that the latest assaults will solidify Theresa May and her Brexit base.

Many in the Liberty Movement would state that this is a good thing that subsequently the British will be able to change the forced cultural intrusion of an antagonistic Muslim majority, perhaps it’s all part of a strategy.

Following the Brexit referendum last year, we are seeing perhaps the largest 4th Gen psyop in history. The globalists have intentionally masterminded contingencies by which European countries, in particular, will either be surrounded by an outlandish philosophy with no assurance from their own governments, or, they will have to respond with overarching countermeasures.

Meaning, Europeans have been given a false choice amid the ideological cult of multiculturalism, or, martial law conditions.

The United Kingdom has been slated for the latter measure, and this makes complete sense if you realise the game plan of the globalists.

Brexit and by expansion the emergence of Donald Trump in the United States has been permitted to happen. Notwithstanding the misconceptions of some in the liberty movement, the so-called deep state is ideally positioned to take advantage of both events.

They are not opposed in the slightest. Why? Because this is about destroying the title of sovereign patriotism and conservative beliefs. This is the long game.

The United Kingdom seems to be leading in the line-up. Terror attacks are ascending, Theresa May has already launched Operation Temperer, and the assaults have continued anyhow. The solution they will offer will be more militarization, not less.

Furthermore, the prophecy that following a year of incrementalism and continued aggression, the whole of the United Kingdom will be in the centre of what many would label as full spectrum martial law.

The UK government might not openly call it that, but that is what it will be.

Whilst some people might find Muslim based societies to be disgusting in their orientation towards personal freedom, there is a troubling trend emerging on the other plane of the coin. Western countries like the United Kingdom and the United States have every right to protect their borders, to refuse immigration from anywhere for any reason, and to extradite unauthorised immigrants and immigrants with demonstrable links to terror organisations.

Nevertheless, the line that should not be transversed but presumably will be crossed in the expulsion or extradition of people simply for holding particular ideological opinions.

Even if the preponderance of citizens don’t necessarily support an obvious broad brush response towards all people that hold Muslim viewpoints as likely terrorists, the appeal will be terrifying, and our respective governments will accommodate it.

Once we descend into the realm of thought crime, there is no turning back, and, what this does is portray conservative/nationalist movements as outrageous in the perceptions of future generations. They will be taught that the globalists warned the world about the terrible racist populists and alt-right organisations, and look what occurred when they came to power, they volatilize the economy and rounded up innocent people because of their belief policy even though they perpetrated no particular violations.

The worry is that what is occurring here is that conservative movements are going to be driven to such insanity in the name of security that we will actually make the globalists look like good guys by comparison.

Therefore, what is the answer? Look at the options the British people have been given.

Accept multicultural sublimation without question, or, start complete military oversight and surrender individual freedom. Are there no other alternatives available?

What about this, the United Kingdom citizenry demands the restoration of their right to self-defence and the legalisation of firearms possession for those without an illegal background? The real answer is for UK citizens to start implementing their own defence, not handing over their country to militarization because they are all unarmed and frightened.

Will this happen? I sincerely doubt it. However, what should be pointed out is that there is definitely another path greatly better to the two being proposed.

We should presume that the United Kingdom will be under martial law in a year’s time except for the people of the United Kingdom doing something now to support their right to determine their own defence, they will succumb to a complete dictatorial structure.

And, in the long run, they will simply be supporting the very globalists the Brexit movement, in particular, endeavoured to fight against. They will do this by trampling the vision of loyalty and autonomy with the jackbooted belief of externalised defence and government mandate, making globalism, the suggested antithesis, look acceptable and mediocre in hindsight.

Literally hours following the assaults took place in London, online petitions were already requesting for the UK General Elections to be cancelled.

Mark Oxley posted the petition requesting the suspension of the referendum on Change.org. It said: ‘I’m quite sure a high percentage of the UK population agree that now is not the time to have a general election, after a second devastating attack I believe it is time to prioritise the safety of our country and its people, that’s why I ask you to call off the general election for the foreseeable future.’

It was in its extremely early stages with some signatures although various Twitter users had made comparable requests.

It would have been a great idea to postpone the Election because honestly, we shouldn’t have risked there being a shift in government, not in the midst of everything else that was going on.

They truly should have called off the referendum since we actually needed to focus on the problem at hand.

Now was not the time for a general election. It was precisely what the perpetrators would have desired, scepticism and uncertainty.

The prime minister was supposed to announce martial law on the streets of London, and quite likely different major British municipalities, where armed forces would start patrolling the streets.

Our thoughts are with those who were caught up in the appalling events and we should be appalled and enraged at the government for not deferring the elections, it was stupid and rash and the sensible thing to do, had they been rational would have been to put the elections on the back burner until everything had quietened down.

This was a premeditated and mean-spirited assault on innocent Londoners and visitants to our city savouring their Saturday night and this should be rebuked it in the strictest imaginable terms. There was no excuse whatsoever for such cruel deeds. officers were on the scene within two minutes and the attackers were dead after eight minutes.

Officers were on the scene within ten minutes and the attackers were dead after eight minutes, however, the government thought that the election should go forward as scheduled.

No one can dispute the misfortune of these horrific situations, but at moments like these, it’s imperative to remain watchful and retain a clear outlook.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It has surfaced that the Metropolitan Police Service declined to assign officers for two hours after being contacted regarding a Jewish teen battered and bleeding by a crowd of Anti-Semites.

 

The shocking event happened on Shabbos, May 27, in Stoneyfields Park in Edgware.

 

Alexander Goldberg, a Jewish chaplain at the University of Surrey, reported the occurrence on his Facebook page. His 16-year-old daughter, Hannah, had been convening in the park with two mates when they were approached by a crowd of five teens.

The crowd had been playing on a basketball court, however, vacated the arena and started to hurl around a football in and around the three Jewish teenagers. The teenagers were identified as being Jewish by the legendary long skirts they were dressed in.

 

The teenagers then began throwing verbal taunts at the girls stating that Hitler should have exterminated all the Jews when he had the opportunity, and they should have all been gassed.

One of the girls pointed out that Hitler would have done the same to the gang, some of whom were black, but one of the teens in the gang answered that Jews were the worst.

Shocked and outraged, the girl requested her two friends to just leave. As they walked off, one of the lads launched a basketball at her face, causing her nose to bleed. She was then booted in the chest and struck twice in the face by some of the group.

The girls then found a passing-by off-duty Royal Mail worker who twice called Police to report the crime. Shockingly, the Metropolitan Police Service didn’t assign officers to the park despite the three Jewish girls remaining at the scene for two hours.

Police further declined to review their failure not to deploy officers when contacted by the girl’s father but did agree to start an inquiry after he had Stamford Hill Shomrim intervene.

 

The following is a report by the Campaign Against Antisemitism.
They announced that they were horrified by the absence of police response to a brutal antisemitic attack on Jewish children. This episode should have resulted in police officers of the Metropolitan Police Service being deployed and this must be examined fully and transparently.

Campaign Against Antisemitism is writing to the Commissioner, the Police have still not replied.

This is the second recent instance of police neglecting to respond to an antisemitic assault. Last week, YWN reported on Kent Police declining to come to the rescue of a Jewish family attacked by stone-throwing teens whilst enjoying a beach holiday.

If Jewish people can’t enjoy their vacation without being assaulted, then what is the world coming to? It’s not like their having an anti-social gathering, or that their conduct is bad, but wherever they appear to go they seem to create a reaction which creates some sort of dispute.

We require some manner of respite from this behaviour from other people or do they have to take it upon themselves to beat the crap out of them if this behaviour continues from others that believe it’s okay to take the law into their own hands?

The police need to dismantle gangs like this so that they can establish a better society that is stable and well balanced.

These gangs might believe they can footie with teenagers that are of another religion, and apparently this gathering of youths had a problem with Jewish people, which is very disturbing, since this kind of behaviour angers me because when all said and done, they’re no different to anyone else, except, of course, if they have different colour blood coursing through their veins, which I doubt very much!

It seems that Hitlerism is pretty much alive and kicking in England and numerous other nations and these hoodlums should be imprisoned or put into some sort of reformatory school to change their bigotry ways.

We are not born bigots, it is our society that makes us that way and we are pressurised and influenced to assemble like Frankenstein, and if we decline to comply we are criticised and therefore our lives are made more complicated.

Nothing is straightforward in this world that we survive in and that is made more apparent when we see our kids out on the streets taunting other people or even more importantly, attacking them on the streets and it’s more noticeable now than it has ever been before.

In the scheme of things, we are little more than machines that take orders and do what our creators command us to do and that is to engage in conflict. This is not a holy conflict, it’s a military campaign that encourages us, the people to no longer look at the truth, and to believe the fictitious drivel they are filling our kids with.

The more twaddle they fill us with, the more the people will attack their fellow man and as fellow men, actually, we are rather vulnerable human beings.

 

 

Workers at a packed pub secured the entrances and blocked revellers inside as an armed gang attempted to break their way in soon after 10.08pm.

 

The Met’s Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley confirmed that all three of the depraved intruders were shot and killed inside eight minutes of the initial call to emergency assistance after brave cops raced to defend the populace.

 

Establishing the death toll had increased to seven, Met Police Commissioner Cressida Dick applauded the remarkable heroism of brave passers-by who stepped in to assist those wounded in the night’s barbarity. The criminals were observed calmly strolling through the market minutes before they started a stabbing assault on pubgoers whilst yelling “this is for Allah”, having previously driven a van into crowds on London Bridge.

The three-strong revolutionary gang wearing fake suicide vests were shot dead by armed policemen after inflicting eight minutes of terror on those enjoying a summer’s evening in the capital, killing seven and wounding 48, with 21 still critical.

 

The Prime Minister Theresa May delivered a staunch warning to those who harbour extremists in what seemed like a turning point in terror tactics after the latest terror offensive struck in the centre of London.

Following the third terrorist assault in three months, Theresa May defiantly verified Thursday’s General Election will go forward and announced a warning to jihadis and those who harbour them and she stated that something must change.

Enough is enough, and everyone must go about their lives as they normally would and society should continue to operate in accordance with our values. However, when it comes to taking on extremism and terrorism, something must change.

Although there has been an important development in recent years, there appears to be far too much tolerance of extremism in this country, and we need to be far more robust in recognising it and stamping it out, across the public sector and across society.

President Donald Trump endured a torrent of objection for tweets he posted following the terror assault in London Saturday night. He stated on Twitter that we need to stop being politically correct and get down to the job of safety for the people and that if we don’t get smart things will only get more serious.

He further took the chance to defend his travel embargo, and stated that we need the courts to give us back our liberties and that we need the Travel Ban as an additional level of security, and rebuked London Mayor Sadiq Khan for what Donald Trump considered a nonchalant acknowledgement to the assaults.

Trump’s critique of Khan took the mayor’s words out of context.

Londoners will detect an enhanced police appearance over the course of the next few days. Nevertheless, Khan stated there was no cause to be alarmed.

Khan further wrote on Facebook that the attacks were sickening and that he condemned them in the strongest possible terms and added that he didn’t have time to waste on the U.S. president’s remarks.

 

He obviously has more pressing things to do than reacting to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet that intentionally takes out of context his comments advising Londoners not to be frightened when they observed more police, including armed officers, on the streets.

Donald Trump also called Prime Minister Theresa May to extend his sympathies following Saturday night’s terrorist assaults, before going golfing Sunday. Following discharging the inflammatory tweets, the president hit the links at his Trump National Golf Club in Virginia.

Before he became president, Donald Trump scrutinised President Obama for his frequent golfing addiction. According to The Hill, Obama averaged 41 visits to golf courses per year. Trump’s session on Sunday marked his 23rd visit to a golf club since he took position 134 days ago.

London Bridge attack eyewitness recollects fear as at least three knife-men assailed a restaurant and slashed customers, leaving them drenched in victims’ blood. At least six people were killed and 48 hospitalised in the terrorist assault in which revellers were mowned down and stabbed near pubs and restaurants.

 

Jag Sandue was at the Black and Blue restaurant in Borough Market when he declared he observed various men storm in furnished with knives. He stated a man was cut down behind him, with blood diffusing onto his shirt.

There were people launching chairs and glasses outside and Jag Sandue imagined it might simply be a fight. Then realised it was more than that, people were running. Next thing we know, they’re in the restaurant. People were shrieking, that they had knives.

He stated a man behind him was cut by one of the suspects in the turmoil, with people running to the back of the restaurant. Customers Jamie and Emma talked about having to hide in the steak restaurant’s kitchen when three men stabbed people in the face and stomach.

They heard lots and lots of bangs, and they burrowed beneath a table. People came into the restaurant and knocked a collection of stuff over, like the till. A guy had been stabbed, he was wounded and bleeding quite a lot.

Emma continued that there were like three guys and one of them had a bread knife. They came in and marched around the restaurant, I imagine they just stabbed anyone that they saw and knocked things on the ground and they hid.

Cops were heard yelling to leave the area before a storm of ammunition was discharged in the distance in footage acquired by ITV News.

SAS troops were stationed in response to what police employed as a terror disturbance.

Witnesses told of a van scything down pedestrians across London Bridge before three knifemen attacked bystanders. One eye-witness identified as Ben informed the BBC that he saw an assailant wearing a red tracksuit coldly stabbing a victim three times outside London Bridge station. He then proceeded towards Borough Market with another suspect as it swelled with Saturday night pub-goers before he heard shooting.

Police stated the three assailants were shot dead inside eight minutes of the initial distress call and choppers were observed arriving at London Bridge as specialist police engulfed the scene.

Controlled detonations reverberated through the area between 1:20 am and 1:40 am.

 

Panicking Jeremy Corbyn has dramatically U-turned on his long-held concerns over gun cops’ shoot-to-kill policy, responding that police should immediately use whatever force is needed.

In 2015 Jeremy Corbyn announced he was not comfortable with a shoot-to-kill strategy in general, proclaiming it very dangerous and demanding police just use proportionate force against revolutionaries.

However, he has inverted his controversial stand, responding police must have complete power to practice whatever force is required to preserve and defend life.

 

The November 2015 discussion took place in the wake of the Paris attacks, where Laura Kuenssberg asked the Labour boss if he were Prime Minister, would he be happy to order people, police or military, to shoot to kill on Britain’s streets?

He answered that he was not comfortable with a shoot-to-kill strategy in general and that he thought that it was pretty risky and considered that it could be counterproductive and that he believed you have to have a defence that stops people shooting weapons where you can.

There are many levels of doing things, as you know, but the thought that you end up with a conflict in the streets is not a good thing. Surely you have to work to prevent these things occurring, that’s got to be the precedence.

However, his surprising attitude propelled a huge dispute, forcing the hapless Labour chief to announce an explanation. Jeremy Corbyn insisted that of course, he supported the practice of whatever proportionate and strictly necessary force is needed to protect life in reply to attacks of the kind we saw in Paris.

 

In reply, the agitated Tory Security Minister Ben Wallace responded back at a hurriedly planned speech intended to help him run from his record on counter-terrorism policy, but it failed.

Jeremy Corbyn has bragged about attacking every single counter-terror legislation, protested the practice of shoot to kill, and gave shelter to the IRA when they bombarded our civilians.

Sadly, voters will judge him on his views and responses in the last 30 years, not his desperate promises and deceptive sound bites three days out from polling.

At an address in Carlisle, Jeremy Corbyn brought an end to the one-day truce after the latest terror assault.

Earlier today Theresa May set out a four-pronged policy to tackle terror by showcasing extreme ideology, locking down on online extremism, preventing the growth of segregated communities, and giving additional powers to police security agencies and courts.

However, the Prime Minister’s remarks sparked objections from Labour that she was getting embroiled in a political dispute on a day when the parties had agreed to pause election campaigning until the evening.

Nevertheless, you can’t protect the populace on the cheap. The police and security services must get the resources they require, not 20,000 police cuts. Theresa May was advised by the Police Federation but she attacked them and said that they were simply howling like a wolf, so now we can dump the onus at the door of No 10.

Theresa May stated that fighting terrorism would demand tough talks with Muslim communities in the United Kingdom, and Jeremy Corbyn maintained that the Prime Minister must likewise be willing to have challenging talks with neighbouring allies and major arms customer Saudi Arabia about terror funding.

 

He cited the delayed publication of an inquiry ordered by David Cameron into the foreign funding of die-hard Islamist organisations, which is reported to centre on the Gulf kingdom.

We do however need to have some complex discussions, beginning with Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries that have financed and fired radical ideas and it’s no good Theresa May containing a report into the foreign funding of extremist organisations.

We have to get serious about shaving off the funding to these terror networks, including Isis, here and in the Middle East.

Jeremy Corbyn has basically gone from being a political activist to head of the Labour party, of course, the reality deviates from his goals but look at all the other parties manifestos where they are so far from reality they may as well be on magic mushrooms than hope anything will truly happen.

More importantly is why is Theresa May declining to publish a long-delayed inquiry into foreign funding and support of jihadi organisations in the United Kingdom? She brazenly courts and helps Saudi Arabia who build mosques Europe-wide to generate their odious practice of Islam.

The so-called moderate insurgents in Libya and Syria, with their endless rebranding, are essentially ISIS and Al Qaeda under different titles and you should answer these uncomfortable issues Theresa May.

Nevertheless, we shouldn’t put all the onus on the Tories, in fact not only have all former governments been into Saudi negotiating but, Labour under Tony Blair were considerably worse since not only was he in it for huge cash returns but also to help him spread diversity into the British people, so many of their hate policies have been permitted to increase because of him and his mates doing.

However, we should likewise rebuke Theresa May and the conservatives. They led us into Libya, helped the radicals, let many of them into the country and these so-called average radicals have morphed into ISIS and Al Qaeda. You simply couldn’t make up such total nonsense.

So, has Theresa May failed on terror?

For the third time this year and for the second time in the progression of this campaign, jihadist terror has interrupted the election campaign.

 

We should feel profoundly troubled that the national campaigns were suspended. Paul Nuttall, the UKIP leader had a point when he declared that these attacks are meant to upset our way of life and that election campaigns, even those including Paul Nuttall, are a vital part of our way of life.

The great news, kind of, is that whilst the other parties nationally agreed on, neither party found themselves equipped to keep to it. Jeremy Corbyn closed his announcement delaying the Labour campaign by asking for consideration on the cuts to police figures.

Theresa May went one better, surrendering a speech that went far beyond the brief of a non-partisan leader contributing evidence and reassurance to a concerned nation and was, pretty clearly, a stump address for Conservative plans on terror.

Labour then dived back into the conflict with a talk from Jeremy Corbyn condemning the Conservatives for their cuts to the security services and singling out Theresa May’s elimination of a statement into foreign funding for extremism entirely.

It seems like an unedifying and bitter way to get to where we should be, both party leaders offering their interpretations of what we should do about the menace of extremism.

The greater difficulty is this, do either of them believe a word that they’re saying? The Labour leader presently states he backs shoot-to-kill and is opposed to cuts to the police and security services, when not so long ago he was telling crowds that those were the only cuts he didn’t oppose and backtracking on tears of uncertainty about an overmighty police force.

As for Theresa May, she’s equaling Corbyn conversation-for-conversation. Enough is enough is her advice, once again appearing more like a box-fresh opposition leader than the sitting Prime Minister and Home Secretary of six years.

 

Her advice that jihadism has been unobtrusively permitted in public life has especially annoyed other sourdoughs of the David Cameron government, not least since she was the biggest antagonist of Michael Gove when he made precisely this argument.

 

One of their number, David Cameron’s former guru Steve Hilton, has broken his silence on Twitter, declaring that he’s sick of Theresa May condemning others for terror when the policy she presided over has clearly failed so lamentably.

It’s true that both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn are triangulating on terror. But whilst Jeremy Corbyn is triangulating towards his party, Theresa May risks a conflict with hers.

Everyone is pretty quick to rebuke Jeremy Corbyn with his shoot-to-kill policy, however, this is a man actually doesn’t want to kill anyone. I don’t think he wants anybody’s blood on his hands. Sadly, he’s touched a barrier since, though he would rather not have anyone killed, there has reached a point where he has to agree since if he doesn’t, he pretty well won’t get voted in.

If that was me and I thought that I was correct in an entirely moral viewpoint, then I would have to concede and stand down as a proposed Prime Minister since my ethical opinions would be more noteworthy than being Prime Minister.

I actually hope that he doesn’t do that, either that, or he simply has to develop some balls and pronounce it how it is and speak with honesty on what he would preferably do, rather than lie to please everyone else. Because one thing Jeremy Corbyn is not, and that’s a killer.

Being a Prime Minister is a really challenging business, especially when it comes to making a judgment on if a suspect should be fired upon, particularly if they are subversives, however, the police are equipped for that sort of employment, particularly the SAS, they have been specifically trained and know what they have to do and I don’t think that Jeremy Corbyn being quizzed on what his opinions are on this, let the big guns deal with it, that’s what they are there for, otherwise what’s the purpose of having them. Or do we all want to put a rifle in the hands of Jeremy Corbyn and challenge him to do it for them?

I know that I couldn’t make that choice, I would get some other simpleton to do it for me, after all, I’m not a killer, terrorist or no terrorist, it’s not a choice I could make. Maybe that would make me a bad person in some people’s eyes, but it’s a moral a dilemma, and morally I just couldn’t take anybody’s life.

Nevertheless, it’s different when you’re the person being fronted by a subversive, then your animal drive kicks in and you’ll do everything to stay alive, that’s why it’s better to leave it down to the people who are qualified for this sort of thing.

I question if Theresa May has any morals, mind you, she does remind me so much of the Iron Lady, but I wonder how much of that iron she could carry on her conscience?

Maybe we are being a tad harsh on Jeremy Corbyn, but he appears to be taking it all extremely well, I really wish he would be straight and say what’s actually on his mind on the stand on shooting to kill because I actually don’t believe he’s progressed from being a mere backbencher to a cold-hearted killer…

 

Jeremy Corbyn stated that he denounced all the bombardment by the loyalists and the IRA. Nevertheless, Labour has criticised the Conservatives of creating false news following a Tory attack video that went viral and was edited to show Jeremy Corbyn refusing to condemn the IRA.

 

The Conservatives are further paying Facebook to incorporate in people’s news feeds, that on the 9th June, this man could be Prime Minister, and that they can’t let that happen. It has been all over Facebook, and the astonishing thing is that people believe what they are seeing.

 

This includes a snippet from Jeremy Corbyn’s appearance on Sky News last month when interviewer Sophy Ridge challenged him on if Jeremy could unequivocally rebuke the IRA. Jeremy Corbyn said that bombing is wrong and that he did condemn it.

 

But, Sophy Ridge stated that he was denouncing all bombardment, well duh, of course, he’s rebuking all bombardment, you wouldn’t censure and not the other. So what, some bombing is okay and another bombing is not?

Sophy then asked if Jeremy could denounce the IRA without analysing it, well why the Hades would he want to. He was simply affirming a truth, that he does not support any bombardment of any sort. It’s pretty straight forward if you ask me, but you didn’t, so I’m telling you!

A number of people who have viewed the film are similar to a televised party election broadcast audience, but since it is on Facebook it is not regulated by Ofcom, which can only consider complaints regarding the wrongful or improper handling of people or groups in TV party performances.

Facebook seems to have a lot of adverts that are being funded for by the Conservatives, that claim that Jeremy Corbyn wants to end Britain’s armed forces, but this is incorrect and the Labour manifesto vows to spend 2% of Gross domestic product (GDP) on defence and that they will ensure that our armed forces are properly equipped and resourced to respond to wide-ranging security challenges.

The Conservatives have been running an offensive attack based on distortions, suggestion and bogus news. They do this because they have nothing to give the British people and their super-rich benefactors, and they fear that Labour’s strategy to reconstruct Britain for the many, not the few.

Furthermore, the Conservatives have made no apology for bringing awareness to the fact that Jeremy Corbyn has given a lifetime siding with people who want to do Britain harm, and apparently would undermine our barriers and make our nation less secure.

 

Amongst the next most-viewed political videos was a Green party snippet showing co-leader Caroline Lucas asking the home secretary, Amber Rudd how she manages to sleeps at night.

Rows came as the principal parties cranked up their spending on Facebook advertising with only 4 days to go until the referendum.

Despite the Labour leader’s growing notoriety, the Conservatives are massively scapegoating Jeremy Corbyn with nine out of 10 of their adverts which are attacking him.

According to an investigation of 889 Facebook advertisements set by the three principal parties into the feeds of more than 8,000 voters, the information has been collected by the Who Targets Me project and examined by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Jeremy Corbyn appears to be a leader who maintains our armed forces or one who wants to destroy them, however, this fraudulent claim may have originated from the Conservative’s offensive video which includes a snippet of Jeremy Corbyn declaring that he wants to destroy our army.

 

It was taken from a speech he delivered at a Campaign for a Nuclear Disarmament event in 2012. He announced it would be excellent if each politician around the globe, rather than taking enjoyment in the dimension of their armed forces, did what the people of Costa Rica had done and removed their troops and then took pride in the fact they didn’t have an artillery anymore.

A different publicly distributed Tory announcement asserted that putting Jeremy Corbyn in custody of Britain’s Brexit mediation, and our immigration policy, was too great a gamble to take.

The plan seems to display the large-scale strategy being used by Conservative-supporting newspapers of turning fire on Corbyn as polling day advances.

 

Labour, by contrast, is barely mentioning Theresa May in its social media warfare with just 9% of the 136 various advertisements viewed so far by Who Targets Me pointing to the prime minister.

The adverts that Labour is pushing hardest are not associated with policy but are asking people to get out and vote. The following most popular issues addressed in paid for advertisements by the party are the NHS and education fees.

 

The Conservatives are concentrating most on Brexit, the economy and defence, whilst the Liberal Democrats are utilising Facebook advertisements to talk about Brexit and dementia but further to solicit contributions.

As you observe poor Jeremy Corbyn. This peaceful, well-meaning person muttering away at almost total disregard, you sense a bit of desperate compassion.

They could at least have the respectability to roar a few taunts at him, rather that establishing it on Facebook, which is more than cowardly, and politically, an insult can be deemed some sort of compliment.

It implies that the target is, if not precisely an intimidation, then at least an adversary who they believe is worth keeping their focus on.

They did hesitate to cheer ironically when Jeremy Corbyn admitted that Britain did require powerful soldiers and defence units. But otherwise, he received little more recognition than a busker at rush hour.

Whilst everyone is in such a rush to make an assumption of poor Jeremy, don’t brew yourself into a frenzy. He is simply a human being like anybody else, there is nothing strange about this man. His face might look a tad overused but he appears to be from a newly harvested crop, and okay he’s not particularly subversive, but he’s an average chap, seeking to do the best for his people.

 

He might look a bit of a defeatist sometimes but match to the corrupt Cruella Theresa May, he’s a walk in the park on a spring day.

They say, better the devil you do know, than the devil you don’t, but I don’t agree when it comes to politics.

 

There are too many venomous rattlesnakes out there, and yes, Jeremy could be one of them, but I believe he unquestionably merits an opportunity – I mean, honestly, could he do any worse than Theresa May is doing to this country now?

 

It’s been a long time since we have had a genuinely worthy Prime Minister, and I truly suspect that if Jeremy Corbyn succeeds, that he will end up being one of those iconic Prime Ministers of our time.