THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

 

Melania Trump has come under fire in the past for her outfit decisions, specifically wearing stiletto heels to face disaster victims and that powder blue Harry Potter ensemble. However, her latest selection of accessory is raising, even more, eyebrows, and creating a few giggles.

If you’ve been tracking the progress of President Donald Trump and his First Lady lately, you might have noticed pictures of the pair returning from Las Vegas following the overwhelming events.

Sadly, the focus rested mostly on what Melania was wearing as she stepped off Air Force One in Washington. More particularly, people were questioning why on earth she was wearing sunglasses when it was dark outside, but it’s not the only time she’s done it.

Perhaps Melania was wearing sunglasses at night because she was rolling her eyes at the bunghole she was with?

People have their assumptions and several stated that she was doing it to hide that she was rolling her eyes whenever her hubby spoke.
It’s a probable reason.

Others proposed that she’s self-conscious about her eyes, which appears much less convincing.

Maybe Melania wears her mirrored sunglasses and cap drawn low so she can truly project kindness and care to the people of Puerto Rico?
But whatever her disinclination to take off her sunglasses at any time of day has lately outraged people across the globe.

Melania decided to keep her shades on while facing victims of the recent hurricanes which have ravaged the USA.

Yes, it was probably very sunny and she didn’t want to squint or glare at these poor people, after all, they’ve already suffered enough. Nevertheless, some have stated that it showed a lack of respect for the survivors of the storms, many of whom have been left with nothing, and it would have been easy to simply take them off.

At least she managed to take them off when she met Prince Harry.

But who cares what she wears?

The poor woman can’t do anything right in the eyes of the media. Perhaps the media have her so paranoid she wears them to not see the snappers and the critical people having a go. If she was the wife of another, the media wouldn’t be tearing her to shreds and I’m sure we’ve seen Clinton and Obama’s spouses wearing sunglasses costing loads, or them wearing stylish trappings to events and disasters but nothing is said.

She’s perhaps finding everything difficult due to being slagged off at every angle and if the media backed off and let her be the first lady she might feel better and do her job.

There are disasters around the States, there are the shootings, and then what does the media do? Report on a non-event. If you look on the media on any platform, you will notice innumerable persons wearing sunglasses in the middle of the night, in brilliantly illuminated studios, so what?

The efforts that the media goes to downplay Trump et cetera and attack and lift Obama is putrid and stupid silly remarks about sunglasses simply shows what the world is coming to. But that’s the left-wing mainstream media for you, with repeated temper outbursts and drivel like this because angels like Hillary Clinton didn’t win.

But could it be because she’s attempting to look cool and also by doing something unconventional she is attracting attention?

However, numerous people wear sunglasses when they don’t need to because they feel exposed or embarrassed and want to shield themselves and they can hold back from truly connecting with someone by dodging direct eye contact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is the mother of a terminally ill boy who was cradled by Prince Harry, seems angelic, doesn’t it? But this mother has now spoken out and has slammed the horrifying plight of the public amenities in England for disabled children.

Ollie Carroll, six, and his four-year-old sister, Amelia, are both fighting Batten Disease, which strips kids of their eyesight, communication and movement and both children spent time with Prince Harry at London’s Great Ormond Street Hospital earlier this year after he made an emotional surprise call.

Months after Ollie Carroll shared a magical moment with Prince Harry at the WellChild Awards, Ollie Carroll’s mum hit out at the United Kingdoms very limited disabled changing amenities, insisting they are preventing some families from venturing out.

Lucy Carroll, from Cheshire, states that each time she changes Ollie in a public area, she wanders out hot, stressed and sometimes in tears and most changing tables are far too small for her son, implying that he is forced to curl his body up, with his older sibling holding his head.

And, she and her husband, are sometimes forced to change their son in his buggy, which is very uncomfortable and unhygienic for him and she ends up feeling like her child’s dignity does not matter.

She is amongst thousands of parents in Britain who insist that standard disabled toilets do not have proper amenities for all disabilities and earlier this year, the media described how many parents said they are made to put their disabled children on smelly toilet floors to change them.

Because of this, some of them only go out for a few hours at a time, while others feel a constant dread that their child will need the bathroom and their children themselves are being left greatly embarrassed, allegedly forced to either lie on a disgusting floor or remain in their own urine or excretions.

Ollie Carroll was born healthy but was later diagnosed with Batten disease, a genetic infirmity that leaves children with a life prospect of between 6 and 12 years.

Sharing a photo of Ollie lying on a changing table in a public bathroom, his mum told it shows the struggle they battle every day when they are out and about and the changing table is significantly inadequate for a child of Ollie’s size.

Thankfully Ollie is not too heavy so his mother can still lift him but his sibling has to hold his head so his mother can change him, but each time she changes Ollie in a public area, she walks out hot, stressed and sometimes in tears, feeling like her child’s dignity does not mean anything.

Ollie is not really heavy but is quite long for his age so it is actually beginning to bother her how she will be able to change him in the future as he proceeds to develop and she has four children so they are continually out and about and on the go and if she cannot take Ollie to places this will affect the entire family.

Lucy told how she and her husband recently noticed that there weren’t many other children in wheelchairs in supermarkets, shopping centres and restaurants and because of this, she stated she had questioned other parents of disabled children why they no longer go to these everyday places and was appalled by their replies.

In this day and age, the United Kingdom has really restricted proper changing amenities for the disabled.

Learning that parents have had to change their children on the floors of public bathrooms, that parents have had to suspend what they are doing and go back to their vehicle or even all the way home to change their child because there were no amenities for them to be able to change their child.

It is tragic and sickening and she is aware that many places have amenities for the disabled but not enough as Lucy remembered a visit with her family to a major shopping centre. It does have one really good disabled changing facility furnished with an adult size changing table and hoist.

Whilst they were in a restaurant eating tea, as a family of six something that doesn’t occur often, Ollie required changing and immediately and those with children will know precisely what that means.

There was no way she could make the 15-minute hike to the only disabled changing facility in the building therefore resorted to the baby change. At first, her husband took Ollie but several minutes later returned carrying Ollie, the baby change was located inside the female toilets.

She explained how she then had to hoist her son onto a tiny changing table, before changing him as his sibling held his head and it is no wonder that this situation is one of the reasons families feel they can not go out and do normal everyday family outings.

Before Ollie and Amelia became sick this never even registered in her head but now it has become part of a daily struggle.

The United Kingdom defines itself as being inclusive but if families feel they can’t take their children out even to everyday places how can this be the case? And Lucy has no idea how to improve this but it must change immediately, after all, would you lie down on the floor of a public toilet?

Sam Buck, from West Sussex, explained how she was frequently made to drag her son, Alfie, from his wheelchair onto soiled toilet floors to change him. At 10 years old, she said her child, who has severe cerebral palsy, was too big to fit on the baby changing units in standard disabled restrooms.

She stated that, because he cannot talk, he had used eye-pointing and picture cards to tell her he doesn’t want to be changed on the floor anymore. He would rather remain in his own poo for six hours than lie there stated Sam, who can no longer hoist her son out of his wheelchair without support.

Another mother, Laura Moore, spoke of her eight-year-old son, William, who has quadriplegic cerebral palsy and he ends up lying on the toilet floor. The floor which may have urine or worse on it, the floor where people have walked in their soiled footwear.

The very floor most of us wouldn’t even put our handbags on, that’s why toilet doors have a hook on the back but this is the very floor that her beloved boy has to lie on and she has to kneel on to clean and dress him.

Grim doesn’t even come close.

Some parents maintained they couldn’t even fit their children’s wheelchairs into standard disabled toilets due to a shortage of space
and adequate disabled bathrooms should be available in all town centres and large public places, such as multiplexes and shopping centres.

These amenities give height-adjustable, adult-sized changing tables, hoist systems, and adequate space for disabled users and up to two carers and a number of petitions have been set up to get Changing Places amenities installed in disabled toilets across the United Kingdom.

Disabled people have as much right as everybody else to be able to access the outside world and due to treatment, they travel to London every two weeks with Ollie and Amelia. This is a two-hour train ride which has no changing amenities for a child of Ollie’s size.

They have to change Ollie in his buggy which is not only difficult for them but also really uncomfortable and unclean for Ollie and the disabled are treated like second-class citizens in the United Kingdom.

 

On April 20th this year, Bill Gates presided over a school debating championship, he was to grant the Best Floor Speech.

Jon Snow was amongst the judges, Firdaws who was from Kensington Aldridge Acadamy was quite exceptional, with her composure, her content, and her performance.

Firdaws had been portrayed as the most brilliant, clever, expressive girl. She was positive, and she used language superbly.

Jon Snow was blessed to have witnessed her first hand and afterwards, and he frequently questions what might have become of her, and what were her life opportunities once she’d been chosen.

Would she have prevailed over the cracks in our society and succeeded?

But just 50 days after, she, her two brothers, her father and her mother all died on the 22nd floor of the Grenfell Tower.

The Muslim custom is to bury the dead inside 24 hours. Months on at the East London Mosque, finally Firdaws and her family were given their funeral.

The Imam was asked how their families come to terms with leaving them unburied for so long, but they understand the reasons and they do their best and what they can’t do, they simply don’t regret, but still, they pray.

Therefore, as a Muslim, they have no limitation, they can continue to pray before interment, and after the interment.

Jon Snow met with Firdaw’s closest surviving relation, aunt Assema. Assema said that nothing like this was ever expected. It hurt bad and there was difficulty accepting what had happened, particularly the family.

Death is always difficult to come to terms with. Assema said that she keeps forgetting that they’re gone and that when she’s thinking of things, she thinks of her family as if they’re still alive, so it’s very difficult for everyone.

On the day of the funeral, outside the mosque, there was despair everywhere. Firdaw’s uncle was heartbroken and several of the women on the street also found it difficult to manage their emotions, and there were others looking out from windows, who were crying as they faced the scene as there were a series of hearses queueing to bring the Hashim family for burial in outer London.

The father, who’s a London black cab driver looked poignantly at the casket of Firdaw’s being put into the hearse, that was shared with her tiny brother. Their mother being put in the hearse first, and the children underneath.

There was a stark contrast to the day as Firdaw’s left behind a record of such enthusiasm for the future, that she would never see.

And being in a debate is enjoyable and marvellous and fascinating because it gives you a voice to say what you believe, what you think, to help shape the world.

Grenfell should never have occurred and we must fight to prevent it ever occurring again. It was an unnecessary loss of a life with so much potential and Firdaw’s deserved so much more. So, let her passing not be in vain.

May Grenfell’s legacy be that her passing electrified us all and to never let people die in this way again.

The life of Firdaw’s and her family was taken far too soon, and before their time. Only God knows why, but Firdaw’s ability will never be shown, as the fire took so many good people, the young, the old, and the brave.

It’s been extremely sad for the family and Grenfell should not be ignored and there has to be some kind of justice for these people that lost so much, especially their families.

Two more victims of the Grenfell Tower fire were formally named, as an inquiry into their deaths was started at the Westminster Coroner’s Court, and Hashim Kedir 44, and his 12-year-old daughter, Firdaw’s was two of at least 80 victims of this disastrous fire which happened at the west London tower block in June.

Mr Kedir and Firdaws were both identified using their DNA. An inquest court was told that they were discovered on the 22nd floor and the circumstances of both mortality were consistent with the effects of fire.

Mr Kedir’s sisters and nieces announced in a statement through the Metropolitan Police that he was everybody’s favourite in the family.
His daughter, Firdaws, was characterised as the most intelligent, wise and eloquent girl with the voice of an angel.

Another young victim was an 11-year-old girl, who perished with her family and was identified by her dental records.

The court was informed that Fatima Choucair was discovered on the 22nd floor of the tower block and earlier hearings told that her parents Bassem Choucair, 40, and Nadia Choucair, 33, as well as her 13-year-old sister Mierna and 60-year-old grandmother Sirria, were further recovered from the 22nd floor.

The court was informed that the little girl’s death was consistent with the effects of fire. Meanwhile, months on from the fire, the preponderance of the survivors reside in temporary accommodation.

Only 48 of the 175 accommodation offers have been taken, according to the Grenfell Response Team (GRT), notwithstanding Theresa May’s promise to rehouse all survivors within three weeks of the fire. And Justice4Grenfell (J4G) announced the stark numbers were a testament to the continuing misery of the survivors.

Firdaws, whenever anyone speaks of her, are swept away by the emotion and hurt in their voices. She was something really extraordinary and moved and enriched so many people’s lives even at such a young age and a there was a passage from an essay that Firdaw’s composed when she left primary school about all her wishes and what she wanted for the future. She was a radiant star, she could compose, sing and draw and had so much ability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Police are hunting for the bucket bomber who sought to blow up a rush-hour Tube train amid allegations the terror suspect is furnished with knives and may have left other devices. The rudimentary device could have killed dozens but failed to correctly explode and hurled a wall of fire throughout the carriage wounding at least 22 people including a ten-year-old boy.

Terrified commuters were seen cloaked in blood with scorched hands, legs, faces and hair, others sustained crush injuries throughout a human stampede as they scrambled for their lives at Parsons Green station in west London at 8.20am.

Pictures reveal what experts consider is a rather unsophisticated explosive in a flaming white container inside a Lidl freezer bag with Christmas lights distending out of the top, a kind of detonator supported by ISIS in its online manuals and magazines.

Security specialists have stated the IED had a timer, indicating the bucket bomber left it on the train and bolted before it exploded.

Eyewitnesses said there was a deafening blast, a flash and suddenly a ball of flame engulfed surrounding travellers on the jammed District Line train.

Scotland Yard said it was a terror strike but could not verify claims there is another device and the suspect is on the run but an officer at the scene informed the media that they think there is a second bomb and that there is a man with knives on the loose.

A Witness said he saw a lady with no skin on her legs and a ten-year-old boy with a charred body. He said the explosion was similar to a huge match going off at the end of the carriage and people just began rushing. It was every man for himself when that happened and the burn victims had severe leg wounds.

It was a pretty hectic commuter train, young and old, school children going to their schools. Nannies attempting to look for children, because of the rush of people simply taking five and six-year-olds away from them and they were attempting to look for them.

In the aftermath, armed police swooped from the SO-15 counter-terrorism unit conducted a hard-stop on a bus in nearby Chelsea Bridge Road. The call was associated with the terror attack but nothing suspicious was discovered on board.

Prime Minister Theresa May was to chair a meeting of the Government’s Cobra emergencies committee to address the terrorist strike, the fifth major British terror strike this year and Armed Police, paramedics and firefighters were all said to be at the west London station inside five minutes of the blast.

A hundred metre cordon was established around the station and a police helicopter was also overhead.

A witness said he observed a female with the skin of both her legs burned away entirely by the fire. He further alleges a ten-year-old boy endured wounds and everybody had comparable wounds to their faces and hair.

He stated that there was a flash at the end of the carriage that came down the train and that there was a really sharp burning stench that came out of the carriage.

There was a girl who had no skin on her leg, whatever she had been covering her was simply gone and there was a 10-year-old boy who had burns to his ankle. There was another girl whose back garment was gone and her hair was gone.

There were loads of injuries from people being trampled on and everyone who had been adjacent to it had the same burns to their head.

They heard the first outcry and then stared down and witnessed a flash and then the smoke and people fleeing. It was total confusion, total panic and people were yelling that he had a knife.

When people began fleeing there was then the odour of charred people and there were more than 30 people wounded. It was a full carriage and everyone had something wrong with them. It was a human stampede after the explosive went off.

There were loads of outcries and people calling to other to run and then there was a human stampede, down the stairs and there were people lying there getting crushed, a big human pile-on. There were several crush injuries on the stairs. People got crushed going down the stairs but Police evacuated everyone from the scene rather fast.

There was screaming, shoving and pushing, it was a like there was a terrorist on the loose with a gun and many people were in tears but when it was all finished lots of people were being supported and attended. It was a complete uncontrolled frenzy.

A woman who had been on the same carriage as the device described it going off, like a whiff of smoke and flames coming out of it.

There were screaming and rushing, and there was a stampede of the stairs and people were falling over, there was a lad being hoisted up after he had fallen down, he was in his school attire, and he must have been about ten, he was yelling and distressed.

A Fulham fitness instructor who was in the next carriage the instant the charge went off, he told the media that he had never witnessed anything like it, it was like something out of a movie. He believed it was an acid attack. And it happened like bang inside ten seconds, he simply wanted to run.

He went towards the carriage where the charge went off and a lady said you don’t want to go in there. He observed a tiny boy with cuts on his face yelling for his brother. A woman was bleeding. Everyone was running and he’d never observed anything like it.

People sustained burns from the blast and others were wounded in the crush as people fled and they were literally about two minutes from Parsons Green when the train abruptly stopped.

He observed people running on the track in the opposite direction towards Fulham Broadway, he could hear no outcries but a lot of people running and they had been detained at the station for at least half an hour. It was pretty hectic, with a lot of police around and police dogs.

At the scene, dozens of police and ambulances continued to be summoned into the cordoned zone, however, it was not known at that stage how many people had been injured and Specialist armed anti-terror units also swamped the area.

Another witness, who was on the train, said he noticed a device in the far carriage. It was a white bucket, a builder’s bucket, in a white Aldi bag or Lidl bag and that flames were still coming out of it when he noticed it and that it had a bunch of wires hanging out of it.

Somebody else from Southfields, near Wimbledon, was about 10 metres from the source of the blast when fire filled the carriage. He heard a blast and when he looked there were flames all around.

People began running but it was fortunate that the train was stopping at Parsons Green as the door began to open as he described the scene of frenzy as passengers fought to escape the carriage, falling and shoving each other and this bystander waited back to take a closer glimpse at what he considered was the cause of the blast.

British police Saturday stormed a house in a London neighbourhood that belongs to an elderly couple acknowledged for their work with child refugees as part of the fast-moving inquiry into London’s tube attack that wounded numerous people.

The home is registered to Ronald Jones, 88, and his 71-year-old wife, Penelope, who has been honoured by the Monarch following taking charge of 268 foster kids.

Neighbours reported that the couple has six children of their own and had begun taking foster kids after seeing the predicament of refugees uprooted from Syria and abroad and the captured teen was assumed to be a foster kid taken in by Ronald Jones and his wife.

The extensive exploration at the home in Sunbury-on-Thames, approximately five miles from London’s Heathrow Airport follows the rather important capture of an 18-year-old in Dover.

Police showed up at the home, which is in Surrey, and decreed an urgent removal of adjacent homes. A neighbour, who lives near the house being explored, stated police gave her one minute to assemble stuff before leaving.

She was in her home with her kids and there was a thump at the door from the police. They ordered her to leave and they announced that she had one minute to get out of the house and get away. She simply collected some stuff and her kids and just got out.

Some neighbours were crying and several stated they had no idea when they would be able to return to their homes but the Police gave several shelter and food at a nearby sports club.

Police did not report details about the search, but the precautions hinted concern that there might be explosives or violent fanatics on the property. The Islamic State group has claimed one of its members planted the explosive.

Police maintained the teen was apprehended by Kent police in the port section of Dover on the English Channel and the suspect was being held for questioning under the Terrorism Act. He has not been charged or identified. Police have not said if he was suspected of planting the bomb or if he played a supporting role in a possible plot.

Hundreds of officers were investigating surveillance footage and carrying out other inquiries as the country raised its terrorism alert system to the highest level.

Authorities said the suspect carried a white bucket containing an explosive onto the rush-hour train. When it exploded, many train passengers sustained burns, and others were wounded as they raced away from the field of the blast.

None of the injuries were thought to be life-threatening and The Islamic State group claimed accountability for the assault, which it announced was carried out by an affiliated member.

In the meantime, President Donald Trump took ferocity from British authorities for a tweet he posted in the wake of the strike that appeared to reprimand Britain’s security units.

The president tweeted that it was another assault on London by a loser rebel. That it was caused by sick and deranged people who were already in the sights of Scotland Yard, and that Scotland Yard should have been more proactive.

However, it’s never helpful for anybody to meditate on what is going on, particularly in an ongoing investigation and previous to the suspect’s apprehension, London was on edge.

Photographs from cameras inside the subway car revealed that the device was contained in a container with wires dangling out of it and that it was hidden in a plastic shopping bag and officials have suggested that more than one person may have been involved.

Increasing the threat level to its highest position was a proportionate and practical measure and police have called on the people to be observant.

The explosive went off about 8:20 a.m local time, as the train, transporting passengers from the suburbs including countless school children, was at Parsons Green station in the southwest of the city.

The station was reopened Saturday, returning some normalcy to London’s transport interface after a day of severe confusion. There was no indication of fear amongst Londoners and the weekend life of the city proceeded undeterred by the increased threat level.

The charge was meant to do serious injury to passengers and the injuries would have been considerably worse had the whole thing exploded and these men, women and children were very fortunate with this one. It could have certainly become much more serious.

Britain has faced four other assaults this year, which have killed a sum of 36 people. The other strikes in London near Parliament, on London Bridge and near a mosque in Finsbury Park in north London employed vehicles and knives.

In addition, a suicide bomber struck a crowded concert arena in Manchester in northern England, murdering 22 people and that assault in May also temporarily generated the threat level to be set at critical.

London Metropolitan police arrested a sixth suspect in the latest Underground train bombing in the early hours of Thursday morning.
After serving a warrant at a home in Thornton Heath, police apprehended a 17-year-old male suspect under section 41 of the Terrorism Act and launched a search of the home.

The arrest follows less than a day after a 48-year-old man and a 30-year-old man were captured in Newport, South Wales when police executed a warrant at the address where the two men were discovered. A 25-year-old man was detained, also in Newport, at a separate location.

A 21-year-old man was detained in Hounslow, an area in West London, by detectives with the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, and earlier police had evacuated a home in a London suburb as well as part of the Port of Dover after arresting an 18-year-old man that morning in the southeastern coastal port.

However, none of the six men who have been arrested in connection with the attack has been openly identified. All remain in custody at a South London police station.

Thirty people were wounded in the September 15 attack on a train at Parsons Green Underground station in London. Police stated an apparent bucket bomb exploded during the Friday morning commute, wounding 30 people.

All of the injuries were deemed minor and authorities said the bomb did not completely discharge, possibly narrowing a number of casualties and the terror threat was reduced to severe from critical over the weekend, but police suggested the public should continue to be alert.

This remains to be a fast-moving investigation and a significant volume of activity has taken place following the attack. However, Conspiracy Theorists expose that the London Tube bombardment was a fictitious flag and despite the so-called Islamic State taking credit for the assault, conspiracy speculators on Twitter have now started to insist the bombardment was a fraudulent flag performance devised to promote Theresa May’s notoriety.

So, what proof do they have to make such a declaration? Not a lot, but it’s not stopped these people dancing to absurd judgments before. More specifically, shoes left on the Parsons Green platform, which one conspiracy speculator claims is the tell-tale indication of a fraudulent flag operation.

Later another photo, this time from the Westminster Bridge assault which took place earlier this year, which further confirms a discarded pair of shoes, with the caption:

Remember the #westminster #falseflag ? More shoes placed neatly on the pavement.

Furthermore, there are more people who think fake flags are always expressed by discarded shoes and one user claims the shoes left behind after the death of Jo Cox, by Thomas Mair, were evidence her death was also a fraudulent flag operation and different people have maintained those wounded in the explosion are really crisis actors who’ve been paid to fake their injuries.

They’ve no confirmation of this but why let facts get in the way of a crazy idea?

Nevertheless, if you look at images of the bucket bomb there’s no white, no smoke and there is zero damage, and the most hogwash about this is, you have Theresa May criticising Donald Trump and what’s ironic is Donald Trump was saying that the internet was being utilised to make terrorist strikes accessible.

Presumably, a bomb went off in this container and there’s no smoke. They believe that we’re dumb because they fill us with this constant formation of defecation all day long and they manipulate us like we’re stupid, they can say white is black and they know people are going to accept it as true.

You’ve got Theresa May who is upset at Donald Trump for saying the same poop as she said about controlling the internet. The government have been kissing arse from Israel and England. We just did an unprecedented weapons agreement with Saudi Arabia who assisted Bin Laden.

The government don’t consider the people, you’ve got Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Theresa May and what they want to do is control the internet and they want to make certain that the first amendment and this is probably the ultimate battleground for the first amendment, the internet and they’re going to try and slaughter that and that’s what they’re using.

They have to use this and this is what they’re doing for it, destroying our freedom and it’s amusing that instantly people criticise ISIS. Well, ISIS is a carpet statement, it’s a carpet attack.

As people could view, it was in a plastic container sitting in a carrier bag and we’ve been informed by the media through eyewitnesses who alleged that there was a fireball and that people were getting burnt. Simply use your evaluative reasoning abilities, if this object that we’re viewing created a fireball which wounded 20 or so people, what’s clear about this image?

Where’s the wreckage nearby to this assumed bomb? And why has that seat next to it not got more damage? Why is the carrier bag still sitting there, not even melted?

There is no evidence whatsoever that this, what we’re seeing generated a fireball, which became lethal and people were injured. It an utter farce and once again people are going to accept it because it’s on the television or because it’s in the newspaper.

Now once again you’ve got the usual BBC news presenters which just happened to be there on the scene.

What must be shared is something that must be taken into reckoning and a man claimed, that it was all over the news, that he was there and he is a media technology consultant, therefore let’s have a look at who this gentleman is.

This gentleman is connected to BSA’s art programme and one of the projects that they develop is a communication gateway product for public safety which addresses the market of public safety organisations and who are the public safety organisations? The ambulance, police, hospitals et cetera.

They photo-type which is actively employed in public safety operations, they discuss in another active full demonstration that took place with assistance from the ESA and involved active simulating medical patients alongside technical staff and medical staff.

They endeavour to highlight the possible advantages of satellite-based communications for healthcare systems utilising the delta system which is a crisis telemedicine system for dangerous situations created to enhance control of rescue and first aid and emergency assistance in the context such as explosions.

The system permits mobile paramedics and units to organise medical care towards victims and the presentation outlines focus on the strength of the satellite system to give speedy emergency services.

It was an experiment and goes on to enumerate all of the advantages, medical and logistic coordination, audio communications with mobile teams. Therefore, we can see it’s a drill and it’s been given away, courtesy of the very person who was involved in this scheme.

So, thank you to this gentleman for conserving us a bunch of time and headache and revealing to us who was exactly involved and of course, those in control are going to use it to facilitate their agenda’s, and already we’ve got Donald Trump tweeting that the internet is the recruitment intermediary and clearly they’re going to have to clamp down on that.

I’ll now focus on Emma Stevie’s story of what allegedly transpired and what she said on the day that it occurred which was broadcast a lot during the day.

She stated that she had got on the train and inside five seconds the doors were closing and she just heard the loudest scariest outcries coming from what appeared to be the carriage right next to them and loud men yelling to run, so when people yell run you simply run so everybody simply ran for their lives.

She didn’t know why, she didn’t hear an explosion and she imagined acid had been thrown around, so she didn’t even know she was running, she was simply running because she listened to men telling her to do so.

She and everybody to got the steps and it was like the worst, a proper human crush that everybody got stuck in and there were women underneath her and there was a woman saying she was pregnant, there was a little boy, his face had got smacked into the step and she was gripping onto the railing in a fetal position trying not to put her weight on anyone and there were simply layers and layers of people yelling.

She stated that it was very traumatic and they didn’t know why they were running and she imagined perhaps it was all a huge misunderstanding or that someone’s phone had exploded in their pocket and she was so fortunate that she wasn’t hurt and she had put trainers on that morning and she was so fortunate that she wasn’t the women two layers underneath her.

I’d feel blessed to if I wasn’t being crushed by her. So, shes describing standing on top of two women underneath her and she feels fortunate she’s not them and she’s moderately clear there being two women, but first, she says a woman and then she states, women.

Anybody that doesn’t know Parsons Green station, it’s a really small station with one staircase that comes from the platform, but then shes on Goodmorning Britain and her description is slightly altered when she was questioned about where she was when the bomb went off.

She stated she was in the carriage next to what was going on, then she heard very loud screams and they were attempting to get the doors open because nobody knew what was going on and they heard men now yelling to run at the top of their voices and everybody simply piled out of the train and rushed towards the stairs where there was a huge pile up.

She said it was terrible and she couldn’t get out of her mind seeing this little boy, he got totally squashed by numerous people and she was so fortunate and that she was standing against the wall, putting all her weight on the wall, but before she stated she was in a fetal position, therefore obviously she wasn’t upright.

She said it was horrible simply being trapped and then the interviewer responded that there was a period where a gentleman simply said for everybody to calm down and it appeared to have an amazingly comforting impact on everybody and suddenly it appeared to become a somewhat British orderly line, queuing up to depart the station and then she was questioned if that was what occurred, and she stated that she was really focused on her immediate surroundings and she said she was underneath two people.

Wow, now shes underneath two people, whereas before she was standing up next the wall and she said there were three women that she could see underneath her, therefore presently we have gone from two women underneath her and now there are three. Well, either she can’t add up, or she’s in terrible need of some spectacles.

Then there’s the girl who was taken away in the pink coat with a dressing around her head and if you examine it closely, what looks like blood, doesn’t really look like blood, not that I’m saying that it’s not, but just take a closer look.

Then she’s seen as she’s taken away by a policewoman, the policewoman is wearing jeans, now is that allowed?

The bucket was assumed to have exploded, can you detect any melting going on there in the picture? The bucket is still totally intact, but this was apparently an incendiary device but nothing around it, look at the bucket, no charring, no smoke, no nothing, it’s simply a bucket on fire.

If you look at the surrounding, it if had been an explosion, there would be residue on the walls, there would be some sort of debris around and people wouldn’t be stood taking photos of it.

Supposedly, police do not tax, MOT, or insure their vehicles. On the recent London bombing, this alleged police car was apparently on loan from a company supplying props for film and TV.

People were in total and absolute confusion as the commotion unrolled before their very eyes. As such they never thought to examine the story being fed to them. That was a foolish blunder and looking back now the dust has settled it’s plain to see that at worst this is supposedly a false flag terrorist assault and that at best we’re not being told the complete truth or complete account about what has transpired.

There are two fundamental photos that give the entire narrative away, first and foremost is a photograph and video footage of the bomb itself. As you can see from the photo we were informed that the bomb had created a tremendous fireball to tear through the carriage though it is blatantly apparent that there is little or no destruction of the encompassing region.

We see no black burn or contaminated material on the train, even the handbag which was assembled pretty near to the device remained in great form. It was further stated that there were flames all around, people were drenched in blood, the device had loads of wires dangling from it and people were crying, yelling and diving over each other according to the media.

Yet again, this entirely differs everything the general populace saw through the media. The image and video footage that was bestowed to us on TV seem to be at differences with the official account that is being furnished to us.

The actual nail in the coffin moment was when a picture video footage of a young female with a dressing around her head, as you will see from the photograph, the young female is wearing a white blouse, there is no fire damage to the blouse in fact it seems pretty much in pristine condition particularly considering a fireball was proposed to have engulfed the train that she was on.

Considering that this young lady has just experienced and been witness to an amazingly traumatic event shes looking amazingly well.

Numerous people have trouble believing our government could be behind such an appalling attack. You may be questioning yourself, why would the government plan such an attack and what would be the goal? Clearly, we don’t have the answer, but we can guess and conjecture.

Perhaps it’s so Theresa May has an easier time passing through additional snooper charter laws, maybe its to facilitate the global agenda to drive us into combat with other nations. Ultimately, we’ll never know, but what we can say for certain is that the government have been proven to head up false flag attacks before.

The plastic tub was undamaged, there were no signs of melting or soot residue, what seems like fairy lights and still working, allegedly having sent a huge fireball down the train that wounded over 20 people. Now we’re on a full-scale terror alert, whilst the Prime Minister prepares to control the internet and outlaw the freedom of speech.

With what resembles Christmas lights coming out of the bucket, it seems more like an arts and crafts prop. There’s also supposedly been footage and photo’s of peoples clothes that had been ripped by the blast, but then when you look, they are, cut straight edges.

Because of this apparently puzzling False Flag in a bucket, the equally embarrassing Theresa May has established part of Operation Chicken Tempura.

Plus, if the fireball had burnt the lady in pink’s cheek then surely her hair would have been burnt too?

A policewoman wearing jeans, well I was a little curious about this and emailed New Scotland Yard asking about clothing that the police use over a broad spectrum and was emailed back telling me that unfortunately at this current time we are unable to give out details regarding police uniforms.

So, some sort of blast occurred in one carriage causing partial injuries to some people in the region of that blast, burns, skin damage and what not. While others were injured in the confusion and the scrambling that happened after as people hurried off the train and out of the station.

There were no deaths detailed and the carriage itself was not significantly damaged. Yet, there are pictures that are circulating that implies that this was the explosive agent or what survived of it.

A bucket inside a Lidl’s shopping bag which was still on fire, but whatever caused this, it was not a high grade or especially complex bomb but this is presently being treated as a terror strike and within minutes people were on twitter trying to score points by calling it an Islamic terror attack as if jumping ahead of an investigation makes them clever.

But the mainstream media are starting to build their stories and make their speculations, getting their sources to acquaint the people and there are now things that don’t make sense, that are inconsistent and are simply unreliable and certain agendas are being expedited, especially by the news.

One reporter brought up the matter that this was a low-grade device and there was absolutely no conception of what it was made up of but they chose to infer it was Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP) and that this device hadn’t exploded correctly or that it was simply a cheap domestic explosive and that’s why there were no deaths and the carriage was not particularly damaged.

This correspondent then correlated this with 7/7, alleging that Hasib Hussain that blew up the number 30 bus had a comparable dilemma and this is why he didn’t blow up the tube carriage because he had to leave the carriage and revise his device and get a battery and then switched his target to the bus.

The problem with that is, there’s no proof to timeline of Hussain boarding the train and then leaving the train but we don’t know what his primary objective was simply that he ended up walking around, proceeding to a McDonald’s, he then went into a WH Smiths but before apparently boarding the bus, though no CCTV really reveals him mounting the bus or on the bus and no observers have reported him as being on that bus.

But the point is, the account isn’t determined, he may or may not have purchased a battery from WH Smiths, he may or may not have used that battery in a device that he may or may not have been struggling before switching to a target that he may or may not have been on.

This centre on TATP is further questionable because no TATP was retrieved from any of the 7/7 bus sights and the homemade peroxide mix that was discovered in a flat in Leeds was found to be inactive i.e, it was not explosive.

The investigators that examined it could not blow it up and in fact alleged bombers were not directly linked to the containers of that compound by forensics, just the flat overall. Therefore, the long story short, this uncertain incident being used on the news that this device was seemingly TATP like on 7/7 and was a bit of washout like Hasib Hussain’s bomb is allegedly nonsense.

The TATP conjecture was further questionable because TATP is not an exothermic explosive, for instance, it responds with very limited heat, it generates limited to no flames and is more similar to an energic bang of energy, with a bunch of smoke that can tear things apart but it’s not a bomb with a mushroom of flames or fire.

Therefore, this wouldn’t necessarily support all of the witness accounts coming out on how a huge sphere of fire came down the carriage and further that people were burned by the fire insinged and TATP can be utilized in a combination with other things, as part of a detonator but the general position is there is no need for the news to be speculating about the structure of this device and its only going to add to the sea of chaos.

The only thing we really do know was that this wasn’t a particularly powerful device but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it was intended on being a powerful device. The indications that it was handmade by an amateurish subversive but in not knowing who really did it, we can’t necessarily assume that it was a weak explosive through ineptitude.

The plan may have been more to alarm than to kill and it may have been intentionally low grade. This was an overground station with a lot of visibility and a lot of access and not an underground station, where the fall out would have been much worse.

Its further impressive have the apparently amateurish nature of the device which is compared with that of the Manchester bombing, which further looked too powerful for the story that everybody was told. That it was made by a college drop out through a youtube video and he built it all himself.

Yet, it did all this damage and it had remote discharge capabilities and people were associating it to IRA bombs, this doesn’t seem to make sense and if the self-taught, self-radicalized within the internet speculation is accurate then surely you’d expect smaller botched strikes or attacks that aren’t actually so powerful to be the norm and you’d presumably expect more of them to take place.

It could have been a meek self-taught, self-radicalised subversive or at least that’s what it could rationally be displayed as, we simply don’t know and again going back to the news coverage of this, which has further been concentrating on the so-called demand for more funding to the police and security services.

Apart from the fact that seemingly the security and intelligence services do a lot of dodgy and answerable things including supporting Islamic terrorism and if there is a person the decides that one day they want to make a makeshift device and attack people in public, there is really little that you can do to stop that, short of having some sort of mind-reading chip inside of each person in the country.

There is a point that we reach where there actually is nothing anybody can do and the focus should actually be on the response, not prevention and not an overreaching security state. We could actually simply walk out of our home and attack someone, that’s simply the nature of individual freedom.

We can’t get lost in the turmoil of these sorts of situations and then settle into parroting things like let’s give extra money to the police and M15, let’s simply thrust money at the situation as if that’s going to resolve it.

We require more police, wandering the streets with guns, do we? Are police with guns thought to prevent everyone with a Lidl’s shopping bag going to make a difference? That’s simply not how the system works, that’s simply not how a free society operates.

Also perhaps the best header out of this that illustrates the runaway agendas that are at work here, is this one:

London Tube Explosion, Donald Trump says Internet must be cut off to stop further terror attacks.

Reacting to the terror episode at Parson’s Green tube station, he stated that the internet was a terrorist recruiting tool and that loser terrorists must be dealt with in a much tougher manner.

That’s not actually how the internet operates and we don’t actually even know who done this attack and we don’t actually know the connection to the internet to it and there is no way to simply turn off the internet and lets not overlook that we already have Theresa May’s Snoopers Charter in this country and that legislation mandates the narrative of everyone’s internet data for 12 months.

The authorities have the ability to hack your social media accounts and mobile devices through rubber stamped warrants but also during disasters like terror strikes. It didn’t stop this one from occurring though, it didn’t stop Manchester or London Bridge but it did give Theresa May a stage to proceed to call for more control of the internet and it further conveniently bumped her up the polls just before the election.

She’s a pretty fortunate politician and this newest event comes at a time when Theresa May and Brexit are back at the forefront of the media again which is presently being taken over by the coverage of this crime.

Supposedly, sources have stated that the device contained a timer, therefore it may be been left there by somebody and not necessarily on their persons, therefore someone might not have set it off alongside themselves. It could have been put on at an earlier station in theory and police have confirmed a manhunt was underway.

Initial rumours on Twitter, a man with a knife associated with this was supposedly bogus news, it was evidently somebody on Twitter that got retweeted and allegedly mimicked by the explanation.

Judging from the fact that there is precious little damage to this tube carriage, CCTV should have caught all of this at every step of the way and we might actually see footage of whoever handled this bag and bucket to exist.

Now whether that ever comes out we will have to wait and see and as with 7/7 we never got any significant CCTV on 7/7 when the bombers were actually boarding their targets or on their targets which has perpetually been a strange fact, either it wasn’t recording, the tapes weren’t in, or it was destroyed during the blast but there was never actually a detailed explanation but with all the CCTV in London, there should be pictures of this Parson’s Green event at some period.

But what do you think?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The University of Utah Hospital, where a nurse was mistreated and restrained by police as she defended the legal rights of a patient, has imposed new constraints on law implementation, including prohibiting officers from patient-care domains and from direct contact with nurses.

Gordon Crabtree, interim chief executive of the hospital, said that he was profoundly concerned by the detention and mistreatment of burn unit nurse Alex Wubbels on July 26. In agreement with hospital administration and the law, she had declined to allow a Salt Lake City police officer to take a blood specimen from an unconscious patient.

Alex Wubbels got a copy of the body cam video of the encounter and, after consulting her lawyer, the hospital and police officials issued it. This will not happen again, and Alex Wubbles was praised for putting her own safety at jeopardy to defend the freedoms of patients.

This is crazy, cries Utah hospital nurse as a cop roughs her up, and arrests her for doing her job.

It’s horrifying what the police did to this nurse and modifications have now been implemented in the hospital rules to circumvent any repetition of the event. Police will no longer be allowed in patient-care domains, such as the burn unit where Alex Wubbels was the charge nurse on the day of the episode and from emergency quarters.

In addition, police will have to deal with house supervisors rather than nurses when they have a request. This will ensure that nurses dedicate themselves solely to patient care without arrests, while other officials dispense with police demands.

The policy was executed quietly in August before the episode became known.

The episode, which has brought national awareness in part because of the climactic video, which involved Detective Jeff Payne, who continued in demanding a blood sample from an unconscious truck driver at the hospital who had earlier been involved in an accident originating from a police pursuance of a suspect.

The hospital and the law in Utah and nationwide require police to have a warrant or authorization from the patient to draw a blood sample in such situations. Detective Jeff Payne had neither.

After Alex Wubbels respectfully and repeatedly read hospital procedure to him and had a supervisor back her up on a speakerphone connection, Detective Jeff Payne snapped. He grabbed hold of the nurse, pushed her out of the building and cuffed her hands behind her back.

A confused Alex Wubbels yelled for somebody to help her and that the detective was assaulting her as the detective pushed her into an unmarked vehicle and accused her of meddling with an investigation but this Utah nurse’s rough arrest has put patient consent law and police control in the limelight.

The police department stated that two of its employees had been put on administrative leave pending the outcomes of an investigation but did not give particulars. A criminal investigation has started, according to Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill, and the city’s mayor and its police chief apologised to Alex Wubbels in a statement.

As Alex Wubbels recounted the altercation with Detective Jeff Payne, she said that weeks after the episode she didn’t think the police were being held accountable.

The discussions she had with the Salt Lake City police originally were progressive, and they wanted to walk down a path of decisive change. But she did not have that same acknowledgement from the university police and the university security, so it was a little bit of a trigger to say, all right, this is what you need to see. If you’re not willing to see it then I’ll show it to you.

Alex Wubbels said that she didn’t want to police the police, but stated she and her attorney were contemplating a lawsuit if the departments concerned in the episode didn’t renew their policies.

Alex Wubbels said that she felt deceived by both Salt Lake City police and university security. She recounted how she sought to get guards to intervene, saying that Detective Payne appeared hostile from the second he arrived.

In the video, university officers can be seen standing by as Detective Payne fiercely grabs and arrests the nurse. She was terrified and went down into the emergency department to get help, to have someone protect her because she had felt unsafe from officer Payne from the start.

University of Utah Police Chief Dale Brophy apologised to Alex Wubbels and hospital personnel for his initial response to the episode. He stated he hadn’t seen the body camera footage until much later and realised then that he hadn’t taken it seriously enough.

He was then able to witness firsthand how badly the situation had been managed, and that this was not how law enforcing professionals should act. Alex Wubbels should not have been subjected to arrest for doing her job and pledged to put his officers through de-escalation training.

The patient Alex Wubbels tried to protect was 43-year-old William Gray, a truck driver who is also a reserve officer with the police department in Rigby, Idaho. William Gray was driving down the highway near Logan, Utah when a suspect fleeing police crossed into approaching traffic and smashed head-on into his tractor trailer.

The vehicle caught fire, and William Gray was seriously burned in the fire. The suspect perished in the collision and Alex Wubble should be commended for her professionalism and should be praised for holding steadfast in her judgment.

Preserving the rights of others is a really noble act. William Gray was still recuperating in the hospital, and he was not suspected of any wrongdoing in connection with the collision.

Alex Wubbels, 41, has served as a nurse at the hospital since 2009. She was earlier a member of the U.S. alpine ski team and competed in the 1998 and 2002 Winter Olympics.

She returned to the burn unit approximately a week and a half following her detention. Alex Wubbels required that time to give her emotions a rest so that she could come out and be practical and efficient in her statement.

She stood her ground. She stood for what was moral, which was to protect the patient, and any nurse, she believes, would have done precisely what she did.

It has given more ladder by America’s Gestapo and Donald Trump has given them more authority to be more proactive by enabling them to arm up with Military Style Equipment and use it to restrain American’s 1st Amendment Rights. It’s time to let people know that America’s Police Forces know it’s the US against them.

The Chief of Police confirmed the detective didn’t react properly. He did the usual and both Mr Payne and the Chief of Police should be discharged immediately. The police are forever later stating that they made a huge blunder and that they are sorry.

If you said to a police officer that you were sorry because you were speeding, you would still get a ticket. It appears that police officers believe they are beyond the law and it just goes to show that the Police are the most deadly gang in America.

If one watches the whole video, you can see that the supervisory cop telling Alex Wubbles while she’s sitting in the vehicle still handcuffed, with Detective Payne still towering over her, that she was wrong and that she should obey civil actions and remedies.

When a Detective like Payne wants to disregard the fundamentals, human dignity, natural rights, and constitutionally protected freedoms. The civil solution, let a judge rule if the evidence Detective Payne collected could be used in a court.

There was no remedy or lawsuit against Detective Payne. No remedy for the aggrieved, even if she/he is actually injured, killed, or shot in the process. This is what a cop is shown. No one’s freedoms mean anything when he’s implementing the law or investigating, and whatever he believes is necessary is okay and he will be supported by his system.

It occurs every day in America. Interaction with police at any level is dangerous to human beings and will end in the loss of dignity, dismissal of rights, and could probably lead to physical injury and even death.

It appears that cops are on a power trip maybe not all cops, but enough of them.

Barely a week goes by without an incendiary video of some cop or cops behaving in a strange or thoughtless manner. The cop, in this case, was way out of line. He was probably over caffeinated or experiencing pangs of doughnut withdrawal.

This is not really unusual these days and it’s terrible. Cops are out of control, as can be viewed by cell phone footage and police body cams and unless this ends, we will be joining a police state. Right is right, and police officers have to begin policing themselves.

We should not let people like Detective Payne get away with this baloney and he has probably done this before. This does not happen out of anywhere and he has been protected by the blue code of silence.

It’s horrifying that without the phone and body camera videos the Detective could have easily arrested her for resisting arrest or could have threatened someone else into violating the patient’s rights. The Detective apparently deemed himself superior to this nurse so picture how he and his kind see those most vulnerable relative to police officers levels of control, the who are poor and those who are non-white.

There are a number of confused armchair lawyers so to clarify. The concept of implied consent just means that by the act of applying for a drivers license you have agreed to the taking of some sort of chemical analysis when police have likely ground to believe you might have been driving under the influence of drugs or liquor.

For years some jurisdictions understood this to imply that a driver was expected to give a breath specimen or if the motorist was unable or disinclined to give a breath or a blood specimen. The Supreme Court clarified that meant permission authorised the police to take a breath specimen but that the taking of a blood specimen was too invasive of a procedure to be taken without permission or a suitably administered warrant.

The nurse was attempting to demonstrate this to the Detective. A lot of people have opinions about what happened, and appear to think that the nurse was attempting to prevent the Detective based on hospital procedures.

While the hospital did have procedures about this, they were based on modern case law and the Supreme Court ruling and were collectively agreed to by the University of Utah hospital and the SLCPD. So people trying to dispute that the Detective had the power to take the blood based on the implied consent doctrine, then they are wrong.

The Detective obviously has the classic big mouth and this nincompoop is the real representation of police arrogance. The very kind that gets them killed and Detective Payne was clearly not occupied in obeying the law.

Did he not consider that the charge nurse would react this way? And the University police was further derelict. It took the nurse going public to get them to take this matter seriously and the only way cops listen is to make them then go to someone else to hold them culpable.

These are the kind of cops that shoot first and protect themselves later and it was best that he was seen for what he is in this situation, rather than taking a young life because he was not being obeyed. For cops that is what it appears, it’s all about, and that all you have to listen to me I am God mentality and we require a more distinct force out there.

Modern Police departments also put peoples lives in danger by having high-speed pursuances. Clearly, Utah simply doesn’t understand and the Detective infringed the Federal Color of Law, which is an offence.

As a nurse, it is part of the pledge to protect all patients and to serve as their advocate and this should serve as a wake-up call for those contemplating going to nursing school. If this offence continues to ferment, then there is no immunity from the reach of an out of control administration.

Let’s face a reality that the cop was a total simpleton. All professions have them and when they’re rooted out by their own ignorance, they should be expelled from their posts at once.

Apparently, the officer at the centre of the debate over his handling of the Utah nurse was told not to bother about getting blood from an unconscious car crash victim in the hospital but decided to do so nevertheless.

At the hospital, Detective Payne relayed his difficulty in getting the blood specimen to a Logan detective, who was not at the hospital. According to Jensen, the detective then told Detective Payne the Logan department could get the blood through other means.

Apparently, he didn’t tell him you must stop, he just said don’t worry about it, we’ll go another way and Detective Payne’s actions were not in the real interest of the patient, the nurses or law enforcement.

He could have simply packed up and gone home.

The police didn’t seek a warrant because they didn’t originally realise the victim was unconscious and they had hoped to get the victim’s permission.

Some people disregard what it purports to serve society, and turn it around to believe that the people are there to serve their individual wants, this seems to be the latest trend, whose standards are being established in the highest places.

Apparently, the article has now been renewed with the report that Detective Payne has been discharged from his part-time paramedic position after declaring that he’d only bring critical patients to the University of Utah.

The horrifying piece of the new information is the reality that the police chief, made conciliatory remarks, and he took ages to view the footage that made plain that his officers were way out of line.

Nurses work long hours for an average wage to preserve the lives of patients, and to facilitate the passage through extreme and terrifying medical matters and I do hope this nurse seeks both legal and financial assistance upon the outrageous man who violated her, and the department who paid him to do it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During Barack Obama’s administration, his children Sasha and Malia were kept behind a solid protection from the media. In fact, numerous adverse stories about the two girls were washed solely following White House warnings. Now that President Trump is in the White House, libertarians appear to believe that it’s warranted in molesting children and it’s a fair sport.

Chicago organised a show that parodies Barron Trump, the 10-year-old offspring of President Donald Trump. According to The Gateway Pundit, the performance is called “Barron Trump Up Past Bedtime,” and stars local comic Shannon Noll as Barron.

The promotional photo for the production highlights a photo of Barron throughout his father’s address on Election Night. The summary of the performance states as follows: “Join Donald Trump’s youngest heir Barron Trump (as played by Shannon Noll) for a ‘Pee Wee’s Playhouse-style’ show that features celebrity guests (Melania Trump, Ben Carson, and Vladimir Putin) patriotic games (Pin the Email on the Clinton), and fancy fun!”

Noll revealed that she did it to use Barron as a means to comment on the government and she was reportedly motivated to take on the position because of her visible likeness to the child.

Noll’s performance starts with Melania tucking Barron into bed for the night. The child stays alert to explore a fantasy world, where he meets the likes of Vladimir Putin and Ben Carson.

Noll has made it apparent she has no concerns about the approach for the play and the media has been shockingly quiet about the sickening mockery though it’s certain they would have been up in arms if Sasha or Malia were the subjects of this comedian’s joke.

Do you believe that Barron Trump should be off limits because he is a child and not a political declaration?

On the day that Michelle Obama sent her daughters off to a new elementary school in a large black SUV with gun-toting Secret Service agents, she thought to herself, what on earth am I doing to these babies?

Her hubby was amongst the youngest men to serve as President, and their charming, young children attracted the world’s attention and shielding their girls from public inspection was a priority from the day he was selected.

The first lady pledged to serve no more than three days each week, declaring herself mom in chief, and to let her team know that Malia and Sasha’s school events should be the first things attached to her calendar.

President Obama, who had written in depth about his doubts as a husband and father before his election, and stated that his wife inspired him to be more committed in his daughters’ lives. Over eight years, they drew a quotidian public picture of their family life.

Supper together whenever he was home, turnout at parent-teacher appointments, coaching the girls in basketball, mom and dad date night, and the girls’ granny living with them to keep an eye out.

No family’s interior functioning is ideal. The president’s aides frequently cited the time-consuming job of raising children as one reason Obama did not consume more time on chatting and other niceties that political Washington demanded of a President.

But, in a 2013 discussion with CBS News, Michelle Obama referred to herself as a hard-working single mother. It was a slip of the tongue that may have been Freudian, and she promptly attempted to clarify that when you’ve got a spouse who is President, that it can seem a little single, but he’s there.

Times of honesty around the labours of parenting and the satisfaction of it have been a trademark of the Obamas’ time in government life. Here is how they addressed parenting

For three magic months, the two of them fussed and worried about their new infant, checking the cradle to make sure she was breathing, coaxing smiles from her, singing her songs, and taking so many photographs that they began to question if they were hurting her eyes.

Swiftly their different biorhythms came in beneficial and while Michelle got some well-earned rest, her husband would stay up until one or two in the morning, changing diapers, warming breast milk, feeling his daughter’s light breathing against his chest as he rocked her to sleep, guessing at her infant thoughts.

Michelle took her last job before her husband joined the White House because of her boss’s response to her family position. She didn’t have a babysitter, so she took Sasha right in there with her in her cradle and her rocker.

She was still nursing, so she was wearing her nursing shirt. She told her manager, that this was how it was, that she had two tiny children. Her husband was competing for the U.S. Senate. She would not work part time and she required extensibility.

She required a regular wage and she required to be able to afford a babysitter and if her boss could do all that, and he was prepared to be adaptable with her because she would get the work done, she could work arduously, on an adjustable schedule.

She was pretty precise and he said yes to everything.

Malia and Sasha were tiny babies when they came into office and it still leaves her in tears to recall the first day she put them in the vehicle with their Secret Service agents to go to their first day of school.

And as she stared at them going she thought, what on earth am I doing to these babies? So she understood right then and there her first mission was to make sure they were going to be healthy and whole and cared for in the centre of all the craziness.

The Obamas promised Sasha and Malia a puppy if their father became President and they took their new dog, a Portuguese water hound named Bo, on a walk before the press crew in April 2009.

The first thing she said to some of the crew when she did her visit because, of course, the staff were greeting them and saying that the girls were so fabulous so she said to them, that they were going to have to have some boundaries because the girls needed to be able to make their beds and tidy up.

Barack Obama said it was difficult to argue with Michelle when she insists that the responsibilities of the modern family fall more profoundly on the woman.

In 2009, Michelle Obama’s press secretary after Ty Inc designed Beanie Babies toys called Sweet Sasha and Marvelous Malia but it was considered unsuitable to use young, private subjects for marketing goals and the company promptly withdrew the dolls.

Barack Obama’s daughter’s response to the Gulf of Mexico’s oil spill disaster was that the Gulf was always going to be affected in a severe way and so his job was simply to make sure that everybody in the Gulf knows this is what he awakes in the morning and this is what he would go to bed at night pondering about.

But it’s not only him. When he awakens in the morning and he’s shaving and Malia taps on his bathroom door and she peeks in her head and she says, “Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?” Because he believes everybody knows that when we are defiling the Earth like this, it has real implications not merely for this generation, but for forthcoming generations.

Every child needs to get a flavour of what it’s like to do extremely arduous work and he was looking for possibilities for them to feel as if going to work and getting a paycheck is not invariably entertaining, not always enjoyable, not always fair. But that’s what most people go through every single day.

When he was first elected to office, Malia was 10 and Sasha was just 7 and they grow up too quick and as Malia heads off to college he’s beginning to choke up.

What’s the stuff that he’s going to treasure on his last breath, it’s not going to be anything to do with his position in office. He’s not going to be thinking about Grant Park and him getting selected. He’s not going to be thinking about even passing health care, as valuable as that had been.

What he’s going to treasure is him holding his daughter’s hand, and walking her to the park, and seeing the sun go down, and pushing his daughter on a swing. He would rouse every day in a dwelling that was constructed by slaves and he would watch his girls, two pretty, bright, black young girls playing with their dogs on the White House green.

But now Chicago improviser and stand-up comedienne Shannon Noll will perform the title part in the new stage production “Barron Trump: Up Past Bedtime.

It’s a variety act in the style of ‘Pee-wee’s Playhouse’ and it’s essentially Barron Trump getting read a slumber time story, and then choosing to stay up past his bedtime and play with his imaginary friends.

Although Noll considered the act a while ago, she takes the spotlight amid intensified concerns and push back and, Chicago citizen and “Saturday Night Live” writer Katie Rich tweeted and then removed an aggressive line about the president’s 10-year-old boy.

Rich was consequently suspended indefinitely from her position at the NBC late-night sketch show. Donald Trump declared the tweet a disgrace.

The shocking tweet, Noll stated, didn’t reveal her sensibility for the show and she noticed that she resembles Barron Trump and she believed that it would be an unusual approach. She has brought on contributors who will play solo stuff, the aforementioned imaginary friends and she is facilitating that as Barron Trump as master of ceremonies.

Barron Trump is supposedly not the target of a joke and when asked if she had any second thoughts about going onward with the production, Noll said no, but she kind of doubled-down.

She was formerly going to create a pretend Trump child, but she looked so much like Barron and going into this, she specifically constructed the character so that he conveys no similarity in character to what we’ve observed of Barron Trump and she is simply representing him as a general child.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were carnival festivities in the darkness of Grenfell Tower. It was the 51st Notting Hill carnival and it went forward with the importance on the nearby disaster.

 

Keeping Grenfell to that this year was very essential and everybody was out there dressed in green, saying that it was a terrible disaster in their community and their strive for justice is that down the line, justice looks really important to numerous people. But whether it’s criminal prosecutions, or whether it’s fair compensation that they’re looking for, it might even be about altering the entire profile of how people in social housing are treated up and down the country.

 

Doves were released to honour the victims and many wore green for Grenfell in memory of those who died in the fire and organisers believed the display would express admiration and honour amidst the celebration.

People have encompassed the Carnival and taken it and made it part of their grieving and it’s tough because there are many people who’ve lost family and friends or their homes and were now feeling too sad for all of this so quiet zones were set up for those just wanting to reflect and a protective ring was also constructed around the tower by the police to respect the site.

550 people perished in fires in the United Kingdom in 2015/2016. 80 people perished in the disaster of Grenfell so well done for the Notting Hill Carnival for honouring the dead. Now it’s time to acknowledge those annihilated in fires across the United Kingdom in 2015/16 and give their families similar compensation and proper alternative accommodation as has been given to those affected by the Grenfell disaster.

Yet the government have done absolutely nothing and the authorities want everyone to ignore it but as the charred remains of Grenfell Tower cast a darkness over the Notting Hill Carnival. This year’s event will be evidence of the solidarity, support and admiration for the victims of the fire and Grenfell Tower was at the core of the community. The survivors of the fire, friends and neighbours, have suffered dreadfully.

 

Sadiq Khan faced Grenfell Tower survivors and families, as dozens of white doves were released at the start of the Notting Hill Carnival as the London Mayor led a touching opening celebration in recognition of those who perished in the fire.

 

Survivors and local residents joined the Mayor, Kensington Labour MP Emma Dent Coat and council leader Elizabeth Campbell in a multi-faith prayer and white doves were released into the sky as a small act of remembrance to mark the disaster.

As people rocked and swaggered at the weekend’s Notting Hill Carnival in London, it’s worth remembering about the significant failures of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) to adhere to even the most fundamental policies of health and safety in relation to the Grenfell Tower fire.

Questions emerge as to whether that same culture of cost-cutting, ineptitude and blatant contempt for the safety of the poor has had any bearing on the levels of public safety standards at Britain’s most famous social experience.

Let’s now remind ourselves of what Carnival presently represents. There can be no uncertainty that it has helped London accomplish its world city standing. It stands adjacent to other global celebrations such as the New Orleans Mardi Gras, Brazil’s Rio Carnival, Toronto’s International Carnival and New York’s Labour Day demonstration.

It has served to define our city as welcoming, inclusive and progressive. Carnival helped the United Kingdom win the 2012 Olympic games, for example.

What about the spirit of Carnival? It’s essential to remember its origins as a festival of black freedom, an event whose roots go back to the one-day annual holiday oppressed Africans were given off from working on Massa’s slave plantation.

Following freedom, the Carnival became a vital element of the African diaspora’s social repertoire. In the United Kingdom, it was the west London Trinidadian community, driven by local activist Claudia Jones who, reacting to the discriminatory killing of Kelso Cochrane, was an important person in bringing the unifying strength of Carnival on to the streets of Great Britain and following freedom, the Carnival became a vital element of the and contentious social event in Europe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As pressures intensify amid the United States and North Korea, safety leaders are having talks on how to plan for various situations as they have to brave the unthinkable. While North Korea’s threats are focused on attacking the U.S. nation of Guam, Hawaii is also on high alert.

Right now the chief strategy is a readiness, and that’s to make certain that people in Hawaii realise what’s going to occur, what they have to do. However, some think the threat is minimal.

Some don’t think that Kim Jong Un will launch anything upon any region or jurisdiction of the United States but New Hampshire officials are further planning as the rhetoric grows amid the two nations.

They have stockpiles of beds and stocks that is required if they need to assemble a shelter for any reason, they could do that. Plus they have pre-designated shelters as well. This could be a pretty distant reality, however, state leaders want to be alert just in case.

They’re operating on it behind the scenes should they need to assemble and that there are policies in place that they have spent time and energy and dollars on a yearly basis to be equipped for all diverse kinds of emergencies and dangers.

The rhetoric from the president, who is ensuring fire and fury if North Korea proceeds to intimidate the United States has driven one candid critic of Donald Trump in New Hampshire to push for his dismissal.

Former U.S. Senator. Gordon Humphrey stated he wants Donald Trump divested of his executive capabilities under the 25th Amendment.

Donald Trump appears becoming ever more absurd and hostile, fire from the hip, and we have to bear in mind that in the context of these North Korean statements that the president has nuclear weaponry in his holster.

Donald Trump’s strongest New Hampshire supporters announced that Humphrey is out of line to challenge the president’s mental disposition.

Mitsuko Heidtke shakes her head in scepticism after discovering that Hawaii is presently the first US nation to plan for the probability of a nuclear confrontation with North Korea. She lives on the island of Oahu presently, but 72 years ago she was in Hiroshima, Japan.

She was 10 years old when she encountered firsthand the total destruction and the disastrous outcomes a nuclear bomb can present and she is upset to discover that there is even a faint probability of going through anything like that again in her lifetime.

However growing pressures amid the United States and North Korea over North Korea’s weapons plans have led Hawaii to take action.

On August 6, 1945, Mitsuko Heidtke was on a train going to school.

She saw the flash. She had never seen anything that intense. Then she saw the mushroom cloud and as she got off the train she saw the worst scenes of her life.

It was so frightening. People were rushing away with skin dangling from their bones and charred. At least 70,000 people were killed by the initial explosion of the US atomic bomb in 1945 but more than 70 years later, the intimidation of a nuclear confrontation is being appraised and prepared for just in case.

No matter how unlikely the possibility, Hawaii is getting prepared, just in case. State and military leaders know there will be limited time to respond if North Korea does launch a nuclear warhead directed at Hawaii. The nation has been operating on updating readiness for some seven months, long before the heightened rhetoric of this week.

If North Korea uses an intercontinental ballistic missile, from launch to hit, Hawaii is about 20 minutes.

Pacific Command would take approximately fives minutes to identify a launch, where the missile is going, which suggests the people would have about 15 minutes to take shelter and it’s not much time at all. However, it is enough time to give yourself an opportunity to survive.

Hawaii is working on how to prepare its 1.4 million inhabitants.

Emergency management officials are working on restoring an attack warning system comparable to the air raid sirens that blasted throughout the Cold War. Tests of that attack warning system haven’t occurred since the 1980s.

Officials have established a target period in November to test the outdoor attack warning sirens. The idea is to blast the sirens following the additional emergency tone that is currently utilised. That one, which signals of natural catastrophes, is triggered on the first business day of the month at 11:45 a.m.

That attack warning siren test will be triggered from inside the 6-feet-thick concrete walls of a civil defence shelter huddled under the rock and dirt of the Diamond Head volcano crater.

Turns out there are various dangers in utopia. Usually, the people operating around the clock within are keeping their eyes on the numerous natural tragedies that can hit Hawaii, hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquake activity in the area, volcanic movement or flooding. North Korea is now pretty much on the agenda of stuff to police.

They want people to just have a policy in place exactly like they would for a hurricane, tsunami, or any other emergency and they’re acutely cognizant that getting people to be prepared takes a lot of cajoling and repeated prompting.

Hawaii has a much broader overall emergency method in motion. Each section is still being operated on. One of the most significant roles is educating the people and leaflets are being redone. An alert system for cell phones is being created and now, people are being told to have 14 days of emergency supplies in their homes, rather than the seven that can suffice in the event of a hurricane or other natural catastrophe.

The current knowledge that military and emergency management officials in Hawaii have is that North Korea possibly holds a nuclear tool quite comparable in strength to what the United States military released on Hiroshima.

It would be calamitous and those in the vicinity of the collision locality would definitely evaporate, along with anything else in the blast path. Hundreds of thousands of people across the Hawaiian Islands would endure the primary blast, indicating citizens must know how to keep themselves alive until assistance arrives.

There are two successions of thought from the population, people are either responding with, why bother preparing? They will all be wiped out, or why prepare for a nuclear strike, because that will never occur.

It’s the nuclear byproduct that could end up annihilating people following the initial impact except if people know what to do. The advice is simple, take shelter quickly after a warning is issued. You can’t take the time to call your wife, your children, your husband to pick them up and attempt to locate a shelter. There is no time for that.

The safest choice is to locate a fallout shelter. For decades, following the close of the Cold War, those shelters were pretty much disregarded but presently Hawaii is looking at how they might finance restocking them.

With the population increase since the 1980s, there are not enough shelters in Hawaii to house everyone and entire communities are without even a single shelter.

Emergency management officials maintain there are other good alternatives to bypass the radioactive fallout, so people must be conscious of their surroundings and options. An underground concrete basement is perfect.

If they’re in a car near structures, they must get out into the centre of the concrete structure away from windows and doors. If there are just homes, they need to go to the inside and if they’re on the beach with no chance of getting to a building, look for a cave.

They should have 14 days’ worth of emergency rations. Not everyone will require stocks for that long, but that will give time for the radiation to dissipate.

People never believed they would have to think about another nuclear strike and there is only one message to world leaders and anyone who will listen. This sort of weapon should never be used, never ever again.

 

 

Energy drinks are the fuel that gets many of us through the workday or school day. The blend of sugar and caffeine gives a quick energy rush that helps us power through when we’re feeling exhausted.

What people may not realise, nevertheless, is that these drinks can possibly do some grave harm to the body.

Researchers at the United States Air Force Hospital recently led a study to investigate the impacts of energy drinks on a person’s heart. The investigation was carried out because they saw an increment of people coming to the Emergency Room with heart-related problems.

They started to believe that energy drink consumption was somehow associated with these heart problems.

The idea sparked since 75 percent of people on the base had verified that they drink energy drinks. That’s a tremendous spike in only the preceding few years without any investigation done to test exactly how these drinks affect the body.

The doctors divided up young participants into two groups. One group was given just under a litre of energy drink per day, while the other group was given a drink that bore only caffeine without the sugar and additional additives seen in energy drinks.

It was flavoured, so it was quite like an energy drink so participants had no conception who was drinking what.

Researchers discovered that the energy drinks contributed to problems with the beat of the drinkers’ hearts. They discovered that the energy drinks caused heart cessation for an added 10 milliseconds between beats.

While this appears insignificant, it can really be life-threatening.

Energy drinks further induced high blood pressure in people only two hours after drinking the beverage. This raised blood pressure continued for up to six hours after a person drank their drink. This puts a person at heightened risk for heart attack or stroke, even in an otherwise healthy person.

These problems were not observed in people who only had the caffeine beverage. Researchers aren’t quite clear on what in the energy drinks led to these problems, however, they think it’s the blend of the sugar infused with the caffeine.

It may, nevertheless, be any one of the various additives these drinks include.

Whilst the researchers concede that more investigations will need to be done before results can be formed about the safety of energy drinks, these primary conclusions are eye-opening. Considering many people drink a can or two, or more of energy drinks each day, the combined health impacts could be catastrophic.

This is very true in children. Many parents let their children drink energy drinks in the morning before school or as a special treat on the weekends. It’s unclear exactly what impacts these beverages may have on still-developing bodies, but parents should reflect long and hard before permitting their children to drink these beverages on a regular basis.

If you’re someone who drinks energy drinks on a daily basis, it may be a good idea to decrease it. Until the additional investigation is done to question their safety, it may be smart to simply stick to coffee.

This should be a message to people who drink energy drinks on a daily basis and you can purchase them from any shop, whenever you like. Many kids get them before school so that they can stay alert in the classroom and to help them concentrate.

Nevertheless, everybody should be cautious when purchasing these drinks because honestly, we have no idea what they’re doing to our body and you don’t have to be an expert in recognising that with the amount of sugar and caffeine in them that something is not right.

If people want to contaminate their body’s, then that is up to them, but the government take food off the shelve’s for fewer reasons than this and yet they have not taken energy drinks off racks. The government are continually moaning that we are a nation of fat people, yet they allow energy drinks onto our shelves that contain quantities of sugar.

There should be specific rules and regulations on drinks like this because these are not isolated instances of people going to the hospital with problems with their heart and presently there should be laws where these beverages are concerned.

The fact of the matter, these drinks are not good for our well-being and still, we allow our kids to drink them on a daily basis and don’t even give it another thought.

Everything that we eat and drink is peddled to us on the pretext of obtaining money, but this stimulant makes us feel livelier and better and enables us to have less sleep whilst we give investment to the businesses that design them.

The system that they sell them is all to do with money and nothing less than that and advertising models the world and the people in it – commodities for the believer that are assembled in front of their TV sets and accept what they see because that’s what publicity is all about, modifying the mind to believe in something that’s not even true.

It’s all a smoke screen that is draped in deception to suppress the brain and fetter our thoughts, it’s the control that advertising requires so that we purchase their commodities without any consideration for our health, so long as it draws them in money.

There has been plenty of discussion on energy drinks, yet the government does nothing about it, but then it’s another great way of decreasing the population whilst it disregards the remainder of the population and big businesses thrive from the profits – it’s perpetually about monetary gain.

It’s one thing profiting from somebody else, but to erode away at somebody else’s well-being is another matter and it becomes questionable when people begin having heart problems and determining that it’s because of energy beverages.

Companies produce so much of this drink and presumably, people are becoming sick because of this drink and it’s shocking as well as disturbing and not only that, our kids are drinking this drink as well, but it’s the solution to giving them enough strength to keep alert in the class room and to be able to study better.

There is a severity to this problem that will ultimately jeopardise the lives of countless people and there should be safeguards put in place where energy drinks are concerned – these drinks are becoming a danger to the human body.

The consequences are going to be catastrophic and what previously was a pleasant beverage to drink is presently regarded as something dangerous and it certainly should be brought to people’s attention and all these drinks should come with a warning sticker.

We buy in shops and launch these cans of energy drinks into our shopping baskets with no understanding of what they’re doing to our body or our children’s bodies. We’re simply submissive Frankenstein’s that are moulded by what we view on TV and we’re contented to go along with whatever we’re told.

We’re irritated by the minor stuff in life and not the major ones because we are dominated by media and advertising, particularly the younger generation, we’re simply the playhouse of drama that has been ensconced into our minds.

 

 

 

Police are used to being called to all kinds of unusual, and sometimes odd, situations. Yet, on June 16th, they never expected to show up at this unbelievable location, an elementary school.

The police were reacting to a request from the William P. Tatem Elementary school in Collingswood, New Jersey. Apparently, the whole calamity began all because of brownies being served at the end-of-the-year class party.

It was announced that a third grader had made an obscure remark about the brownies, another classmate eavesdropped and maintained that it was, in fact, a prejudiced comment. The school concluded they needed to get the police involved.

The police officers sat down and talked with the 9-year old boy who made the supposed bigoted remark, along with his mother, Stacy Dos Santos. Stacy Dos Santos stands by her son and maintains that the school totally exaggerated and her little boy would never do such thing, he just made a remark about the snacks.

He was simply discussing brownies, who precisely did he insult?

The drama proceeded to unfold as the police later communicated with the boy’s father and then referred it to the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency, but the 9-year-old was traumatised, according to his mum, he even stayed home from his last day of school. Stacy Dos Santos even wants to put her child in a new school come the fall.

That’s not all, she demands an apology from the school.

She is not satisfied with the administration at Tatem. She does not trust them and neither does her child. He was frightened, there was a police officer there with a piece in his holster speaking to her son, questioning him on what he had said and he didn’t have anybody on his side.

The episode got wind throughout the neighbourhood and it quickly sparked outrage and parents are shocked that events such as this could have quickly been managed by the school and by no means justified police attention.

The Superintendent of the school area, Scott Oswald, stated that police have just been requested up to 5 times a day in a community of just 1,875 pupils and this has generated justifiable attention amongst the parents.

Parents have started a petition to stop mandated criminal investigation of elementary school students.

Kids frequently say stuff that might be improper or are not politically correct and that can lead to extremely awkward situations, but they’re simply kids who are mastering the habits of knowledge but it’s up to schools and parents to oversee their children onto the correct path and to demonstrate why we can’t say specific things simply because they appear to be politically incorrect.

If kids are going to get offended because another student wants to discuss the ‘brownie’, then just change its name and name it something else, but it’s a system that has gone barking mad because it appears that when somebody now says something we all appear to require a legal counsellor in our corner, shortly it’s going to be part of the school program.

A meeting on May 25th involving the police, school administrators, and the Prosecutor’s office confirmed that schools would call the police concerning any criminal conflicts, including as minor as a simple name-calling episode that the school would typically manage within.

Whether this little boy name called or not, it was merely a simple incident that did not require the police and could have just been dispensed with between the school and the boy’s parents, and this was really a strain on resources for the police department.

They further chose to report just about every incident to the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency. Only a couple of months later, the directive is being seriously reviewed. It has gone way too far.

Parents worry that the extended police engagement is not benefiting their children, in fact, it’s absurd.

Some of it is really normal little-kid behaviour and the school are presently uncomfortable managing these sorts of circumstances or merely don’t know how to control such situations.