THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Frankly, I’m not sure how Madonna could have really likened herself to Martin Luther King Jr or the former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela – who the hell does she imagine she is?  She’s clearly assuming that she’s something that she’s not, which really does paint a picture that she’s unquestionably having some sort of issue in her life.

She went on to say that she was just admiring and acknowledging their Rebel Hearts – Nelson Mandela a rebel, not sure about that fact, but he was a freedom fighter, and the greatest man alive, when he was alive, and will for sure carry on being so for centuries to come, but I think she should have said rebellion and not rebel, maybe she should have named her album Rebellions at Heart…

If she wanted to compare herself to a rebel, perhaps she should have said she was a little bit like James Dean or Marlon Brando, which would have been a much better portrayal.

 

Madonna stated that anyone who fights for freedom is a rebel heart, however, she should also realize that there are different types of rebels, and some are not fighting for freedom.  Nelson Mandela opposed a cause, which was to free the people of South Africa, and for that it yielded a very high price, and he is an icon of admiration to all South Africans, and was of far more importance than being put on an album cover.

The Tories much boasted election poster campaign was in shreds after it came out that the characteristic road was in fact a photograph taken in Germany.

George Osborne said that it was a British road pictured on the election poster, which assured the party would keep Britain on the road to a more abundant economic system.

According to George Cameron, it’s a British photograph, and a British road, I guess George needs to go back to SpecSavers…

The photograph itself comes from iStock, run by the picture agency Getty Images, and was taken by German photographer Alexander Burzik six years ago, although it has been digitally adapted since then.  The colors have altered, the sky has been changed, and a gap in the trees has been made, with some additional fields appended to the backdrop.

Alexander Burzik said that the original photograph had been taken close to his home town of Weimar, in central Germany, however, some Tories on Twitter have supported the use of the picture, despite it being from Germany, and not Britain.

However, the gaffe is particularly invigorating UKIP admirers, which now implies that they’re apostles will be following UKIP around like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, which is a bit of a piss take, taking into account, that’s where the Pan Piper was portrayed as coming from Germany.

 

I’m not criticizing, but wouldn’t that be like the pot calling the kettle black?  So, we can color it over as much as we want, but really UKIP is no better than the Tories, and that’s no understatement.  All the same, UKIP is fundamentally new, and should be given a bit of an opportunity in the run up to the 2015 election, aside from the fact that almost all parties are habitual liars, and are famed for telling all sorts of fibs to make themselves look good, and as viewed with this photograph, they will go to any lengths to do just that.

A former Labor MP has been slammed for proposing that people should only get welfare payments if they’re placed on forced contraception, however, Gary John’s suggestion was draconian and ill-informed.

Gary John’s lost his seat in 1996, and distanced himself from the Labor Party since then.  He wrote his views in the Australian on Tuesday, stating taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for people’s decisions in having children.

Mr John’s went on to state that possible parents of inadequate substance, poor skills or of defective fibre should not enter parenthood while on a benefit.

He also went on to say that some families, some communities, some cultures spawn discord, however, he did not say which ones, and he also said “some”, which also means “not all”, which also means that everyone has to suffer.  I’m not stating that what he is saying is true, however, what I am stating is that by taking everybody who is on benefit and productive, and to put them on contraceptives, signifies that the only people procreating would be those on a middle to high living – sounds a bit like they’re attempting to breed “Stepford Children.”

What Mr John’s is proposing is a criterion of proposed draconian methods, and its ill-informed, inadequate policies and grievous because of the stigma it impounds for single parents.  His beliefs are gestated out of ignorance, and leapfrogs over systemic events of welfare in order to incriminate certain individuals.

In fact the said article only amounts to naive affirmations made by somebody who is privileged, but it’s all about welfare bullying, and the government has an obligation to all its people, whether they’re reproductive or not, and if the government is going to dictate on whether we are permitted children or not, we may as well be part of China and become a communist nation.

While we’re tucked up in our lovely bed, please give a thought to other people sleeping rough on the streets.  We scarcely give a thought to those that are out in the freezing cold with no family or friends to assist them.

They’re not tramps that solicit, steal or borrow, they are really homeless, and need assistance, not in a year’s time, or a month’s time, but right now…

They do not have any possessions, primarily because everything that they did once possess is now gone, and it’s majorly important that we help those in need.  We have Children in Need on TV, so why can’t we help those on the streets?  Children need some help, however, so do adults that have become hard times for whatever reason, it shouldn’t be an issue, they’re still human beings.

There is no Homeless Shelter in Basildon. Essex, but we genuinely need one because the church is feeding about 25 rough sleepers around the town, and there are more rising numbers of people sleeping rough.  There was talk of a dispersal order being brought in, however, that’s no good if there’s nowhere for these people to move onto, there needs to be something put into place.

Nobody was doing anything aside from the church to assist these people till a page was set up on Facebook called “Homeless Help in Basildon and Surrounding Areas”.  Now ordinary people are going into town to feed the homeless, and a location has been set up for a Sunday for the homeless to go and get food that many ordinary people have prepared, taking it, and circulating it to the homeless that attend – now that’s what I call team spirit.

Basildon urgently needs a Shelter at night, like in Southend on Sea, where they have the Homeless Action Resource Project, where they can sleep and get assistance applying for a council home or jobs, however, some people don’t accept that there is a homeless problem in Basildon.

We frequently forget that kindness is free, and these volunteers also raised £250 over two weeks to put one well-known homeless man in a hotel for a few nights over the Christmas holiday, and treat him to a meal.  He is often spotted sleeping rough in the doorway of Primark, in Basildon town center.

Everyone should give something to their community, and now some of the community has come together, and the word is getting about what they are doing for the homeless.  It’s outstanding work that has been done for the homeless, but it’s distressing to think that the council has not housed them, or at least put them into temporary accommodation until homes are found for them.

Even Costa Coffee done their bit for the homeless, and gave one well-known homeless man a Costa Coffee travel mug, it made his day, he was so chuffed, however, it still breaks your heart to know that when you go home, in your nice warm house, these people will be out in the freezing cold with nowhere to go to keep warm.

Margaret Thatcher personally shrouded child abuse allegations made against one of senior government ministers. The Tory Prime Minister evidently held a high powered meeting, who was being tipped for promotion, and told him that he had to clean up his sexual behavior.

It followed an allegation that the minister had sexually abused young boys at the home of one of his political allies in 1982. Nevertheless, the minister seemingly dismissed the warnings, and it is claimed that four years later he was spotted by police looking for young boys for sex at Victoria railway station in London, however, no action took place.

The claims made by an informant with inside knowledge of Scotland Yard in the early 80’s are now expected to be put before the Westminster child abuse inquiry that has been announced by the Prime Minister. It claims that there was an establishment cover up to protect politicians. Judges and police officers involved in a macabre pedophile network.

David Cameron has already agreed to a full scale probe into the historical allegations of child abuse, and he has nominated Lady Butler-Sloss to head the investigation, and although the investigation is in its infancy, its determinations could be extremely volatile, especially if it shows that a previous Prime Minister knew about the allegations.

If this proves to be true, then these extraordinary disclosures will unwrap a remarkable state of affairs, so much so that they’re virtually unimaginable. However, that is what people said about Jimmy Savile, and look what happened to him.

The minister’s supposed involvement in abusing adolescent male children first came clear later on when he had been staying at the dwelling of a constituency agent. A high level gathering involving Margaret Thatcher. Prime Minister at the time, and Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw, as well as a senior policeman, and an M15 officer was carried out to talk about the said behavior.

Nevertheless, rather the minister being disciplined or dismissed, the minister was given cautionary words of advice about his future behavior, and the subject was brushed under the rug, only four years after new allegations rose up.

The politician was said to have been found looking for rent boys in the men’s lavatories at Victoria railway station in London in 1986. The toilets were the target of a clandestine sting by Scotland Yard investigators. The officers approached the minister and admonished him about his behavior, it is thought that a report was lodged by a CID officer, but clearly nothing was done about the minister’s behavior, and yet again it was brushed under the carpet.

Piccadilly Circus is one of London’s most infamous rent boy hangouts, which is cited as the chicken rack. A former rent boy taken in by the Westminster sex ring outrage disclosed he was blackmailed into being abused by top Tories.

Now a respectable father of four, he stated how as a young man he was plied with liquor and was afterward coerced to have sex by a Tory minister, and he went to a squalid house party where two Tories celebrated their first year as MPs by having sex with boys as young as twelve years old.

He as well rubbed shoulders at parties in the 1970s with top conservatives, including Sir Keith Joseph, Sir Rhodes Boyson, and Sir Michael Havers.

 

The young boy came to London in 1975, as a dewy-eyed 20 year old who was taking flight from the difficulties of his home country in which one of his best friends had been shot dead. He meandered the streets penniless, and finally ended up in Piccadilly Circus, which was then the notorious arena addressed as the Chicken Rack, where young rent boys touted for clientele.

He said that he was asked if he was looking for anything, and then the three of them proceeded to an eating place where they boozed on wine, and he was tendered a loan, but he stated they were so kind to him, he just got carried away in the here and now.

He claims he was raped twice, and he was then told they would be in touch, and they said that they knew some extremely significant people who would be keen to encounter new boys, but he felt humiliated because he just believed that they were being kind.

Feeling entrapped, he promptly found himself being pimped out by people who had high profile politicians among their customers. The next day he said he was instructed to keep company with an MP to a country dwelling in Essex where they had sex, however, he pleaded with the man pimping him out to stop.

He was threatened, and told that he had no estimation of the people and the mightiness that they exert, and he was ensnared by two menacing pimps who threatened to mail graphic photographs of him to his parents if he attempted to flee their clutches.

He was even warned that his family back home in Northern Ireland would have an accident if he refused to have sex with their powerful clients.

This man that has been interviewed sobbed uncontrollably. His wife knew nothing of what had happened to him, however, he admitted to her that he was part of this, and that he was raped. He had shut away the subject deeply in a vault inside his head, but now seeing the article, blew it all up again for him, all the dread, hurt and torment came flooding back to him.

He spoke in a hotel close to his home in a small town in Northern Ireland, and he is looking at giving a statement to the government inquiry into the scandal.

He said that he felt that he was at risk, however, these people had been so good to him.  He said that once he was back at the flat that they had taken him to, he felt lightheaded, and got up to leave, however, he was forced into a bedroom, and he felt helpless.  He was then stripped down, and pushed onto the bed.  He did not consent to this at any time, and he felt like he was in an out of body experience, and that perhaps he had been drugged.

He claims he was raped twice, and he felt absolutely exploited.  He was given £30, and told to lighten up, and to stop being so bloody provincial.  The man informed him that he would be in touch.

Photographs were taken of him in bed, and it was stated that they could fall into the wrong hands, including papers and his family, and was told that he couldn’t just think he could run away from this.

Feeling ensnared, he promptly found himself being pimped out by the two men, Kevin or Alan, who had high profile politicians among their customers. Days after he claims Charles Irving, the then Tory MP for Cheltenham arrived.  He approached the politician, inquiring if he was looking for anything, and Irving responded by saying he was looking for him.

He pleaded with the man pimping him out to stop, but only to get more menacing threats. Alan informed him that he had no idea about the people he knew in power, and how dangerous they could be. He said that if they could murder 13 people on the streets of Northern Ireland and get away with it, there would be little difficulty in the setting up for an accident to happen to a member of the lad’s family, this young boy was unquestionably out of his depth.

Before long, he was being taken to parties with a chain of senior Conservatives. It was a house close to Whitehall, where he was guided into a room where numerous men and a few younger boys aged about 15 were boozing.  He was acquainted with an Irish boy, and was then offered a drink from a bowl of punch, and he drank it down. Glass after glass, like it was lemonade.

He was made to sit between two men, who it was stated were both MPs, and they started to rub their hands on his legs and thighs, and he was forced to perform assorted sex acts on some of the men. The scenery was perpetually the same, with a hum of exalted spirits.

The Conservatives felt they were unstoppable…

One night he was taken near the House of Lords and picked up by a peer, they were driven round London while he performed a sex act on him, the peer then gave him a fountain pen.

One of the most seedy parties was thrown one Saturday night at a country house. There were younger boys, and they were all situated in the center of a room, boxed in by a big leather sofa. They were ordered to strip off their clothes and have sex together. He noted a boy of almost 12 or 13 being taken into another room, but he assumed that he’d just been delivered. The boy faced him, and he saw fear in his eyes, it was a look that would forever haunt him.

The abuse before long had an effect on his well being. He was drinking far too much, and had breathing problems. When he was at rock bottom, he went to the home of one of his pimps to face up to him. The pimp opened the door, and he collapsed into the hallway.

The pimp didn’t call an ambulance, he didn’t want a scene, so he put him in a spare room, and he cried himself to sleep. The next day the pimp gave him £50 and told him to go home because he thought he was going to die. He flew back home where he was diagnosed with acute bronchitis, but he didn’t say a word to anybody, and it took a year to deal with it, however, the scars will never mend.

The man in question has turned his life around, he married in 1981, and works as an office manager, but he wants people to know what happened. He wants to see people held accountable, and he wants the truth to come out, and for people to know what goes on in administrative circuits.

Our government seems to have legal power over everything that we do, and they are extremely organized when doing it. They think that they can control everything, it’s their strong point, as they congregate unitedly and scatter mayhem wherever they go, however, the devastation reeks with an unpleasant aroma which suggests that something is not right in the governments abode, which is now bringing wrath to the public.

No teenager should be put through what these deviates are doing to them, it’s harmful and detrimental, and these people are exploiting their influence upon young teenagers, which is clearly inappropriate behavior, and not desirable for teenagers to experience or receive.

If it were anyone else, the issues would have been promptly been exposed, and they would have been caught and charged, and quickly been condemned to prison, however, because it’s inside government, it’s swept under the rug for many, many years, and never talked about, nevertheless, they’re getting away with it, and that’s not acceptable at all.

Confidential medical data from sick and disabled people claiming welfare benefits is opened and screened by Royal Mail staff on behalf of the Government without the claimant’s knowledge or consent.

Breaches of confidentiality have emerged that the Department of Work and Pensions routinely uses the Royal Mail to process thousands of benefit claims, including health information it receives daily.

The disclosures have cued bracing fears about the fact that the handling of sensitive personal data is being lawfully outsourced without the claimant’s consent.

People claiming sickness benefits such as employment and support allowance must start by completing an elaborate medical questionnaire explaining their conditions, prescribed medications and therapies, and the names and addresses of their doctors and nurses.

It asks some extremely sensitive questions about addictions and mental illness, and is then mailed in a pre-addressed envelope to the DWP or Atos health care.

Yet, it has emerged that these envelopes are routinely opened, and the contents screened by Royal Mail, unless the envelope is specifically checked off as private and confidential. In those cases, the envelopes are posted straight onto Atos unopened, according to the DWP.

It all became clear when a local post office was told not to bother posting ESA forms by special delivery as the envelopes would be opened by Royal Mail irrespectively. Nowhere in any claimants paperwork does it state that a third party is involved, and Royal Mail is posting extremely personal data, and people have a right to know this is happening simply because they’re being misled.

Claimants often have incredibly complex case histories. They may have mental health problems or be victims of sexual abuse, which they find incredibly unsettling to now know that such deeply personal information is being shared with Royal Mail.

While there are no grounds to question the sheer integrity of the Royal Mail, they simply should not have entree to this sort of information, particularly in the run up to the Christmas holidays when Royal Mail frequently takes on students that are now rummaging through our post, and that’s where the claimants information leaks out, and there is nothing stopping them from opening our post, and passing that data onto other people.

The DWP has said that security measures had been put in place to minimize the danger of any data breaches, including CCTV in sorting rooms and procedures that mean that at least two people open the post together, however, that doesn’t mean that the people working there will not pass any information by word of mouth, or to even to make fun of those claimants that have extremely sensitive issues.

The keynote here is that claimants should have their information kept private, and that staff that are dealing with such sensitive information should be made to sign a confidentiality clause because of the impact it could have on claimants if their information was to be passed on to somebody that it shouldn’t be.

And there should be fears that the government department could even contemplate allowing such sensitive and confidential medical information to be handled by a third party without the claimants agreeing to it, and there appears to be too many agencies dealing with claimants personal data which needs to be protected.

A person’s information should be safely guarded to subdue any breaches of security, and it doesn’t matter how reputable an agency is, there is still that probability that there could be breaches of security.  Although, that is not proposing that Royal Mail staff are bribable or unreliable, however, it would still be unintelligent to think that nothing or nobody is infallible.

It’s not like there haven’t been breaches in security before, and to a degree that is somewhat disturbing, although one cannot say it would materialize, however, on the other hand, we can’t go around with the pretense that it wouldn’t, and Royal Mail going through our mail can only be a hindrance where claimants are concerned.

Hallucinogenic fungi have been found springing up in no other than the Queen’s garden at Buckingham Palace, after being identified by gardening expert Alan Titchmarsh.

TV presenter excavated the fungi at Buckingham Palace for an ITV gardening show. Alan Titchmarsh recognised the red and white toadstool as he was on his tour of the secluded 40 acre plot. If consumed, it’s known for it’s extremely hallucinogenic effects, however, it also makes people who eat it extremely ill.

The old fashioned thing was to feed the mushrooms to the village idiot, and then to drink his urine because then you would get all the high without any of the sickness.

For the avoidance of uncertainty, fungi from the garden are not used in the palace kitchens, however, it would be so easy not to resist the odd poke here and there just for fun. Comics are going to whizz into this article and centre their rhetoric upon the public, and there will be no censorship of what they articulate.

Alan Titchmarsh has exhausted twelve months researching how the Palace garden alters with the seasons, and we will be experiencing the finishing calendar year with a Christmas tree mounted in the Marble Hall, adorned with holly and mistletoe from the royal garden, which will be festooned with festive golden crowns of magic mushrooms… just joking of course about the mushrooms!

More than 60% of untoward Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) sanctions decisions were made during the first three months of 2014 against people with mental health issues or behavioural problems.

There were 508 adverse sanctions against ESA claimants with diseases of the circulatory or respiratory system, 1,598 against those with diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. There were 571 against people with diseases of the nervous system, 714 against people with injuries, poisoning and certain other issues of external causes, and there were 2,727 against those with other health conditions or disabilities.

According to the DWP, benefit sanctions are used to boost people to engage with the support being provided by Jobcentre’s, by making it clearer to claimants what they are required to do in return for their benefits. Nevertheless, charities and medical experts state that people with mental health issues, learning problems and behavioral problems frequently fight to see what is demanded of them in return for their benefits because they cannot conform to the rigorous demands because they can prove to be more difficult for these groups of people, who are not given any extra support and direction.

It’s very worrying that an increasing amount of people on ESA are having their benefits terminated, despite the fact that there are fewer people on WRAG (Work Related Activity Group). About half the people in the WRAG require support because they have mental health problems, however, over 60 percent of sanctions are placed on this group.

It’s unwarranted that people with mental health problems are being disproportionately affected by the progressively punitory system, and people are manipulated and forced to undertake activities that are inappropriate for them, particularly when they’re not having their mental health taken into account.

As a result of this, people become panicky and sickly, and this makes a reappearance to work exceedingly improbable. We actually need to see people with mental health problems placed in a scheme that recognizes and helps them overpower the challenges that they are fronting everyday.

Not every person who is mentally challenged can manage to get back into work, however, for those that can, they should be assisted at whatever the cost, and those that can’t work any longer should also be helped. This is why our country is called the United Kingdom, a nation that is linked together politically, for the common purpose, or by common beliefs, like a team that is formed by amalgamation.

When David Cameron said that we were all in this together, was he implying the same thing, and did he want a team that was formed by amalgamation. If so, then why is he not putting his money into the welfares financial kitty?  What he was really suggesting when he stated we were all in this together, so long as it’s taxpayers money, and they are putting it into the government’s honey tree…

There’s a semi derelict bus depot in Blackburn town center that could be brought back to life as a charity and recycling center. Up to 10 homeless people would live there under supervision.

The garage was closed in 2011. It was then bought by Blackburn and Darwen Council and now the borough is set on selling it to a Lancashire based charity, which aids to marginalize people back into the stable, and independent living. The charity’s associated social enterprise will run the site as a recycling center for scrap metal items.

Not far from where David Cameron went to school at Eton, there used to stand a workhouse for the misfortunate poor in Victorian England. Husbands and wives were separated from one another, as well as mothers from their children.

When Elizabeth Wyse tried to spend the night with her daughter on Christmas Day 1840, the workhouse director hauled her from the room, and shut her away in the workhouse cage, and left her in solitary confinement with no coat, no bedding, straw, and no chamber pot for 24 hours.

The following morning, she was dished up her fellow inmates stale gruel before being sent back to her unclean cage to clean it, with her hands.

The Victorians disliked the poor, and at the Andover workhouse in Hampshire, a single adult female with illegitimate children was driven to wear a yellow stripe across their robes if they wanted to eat. Adolescent boys were sent out to work in the tanneries, and were so famished, they had to eat on decaying bones, and putrid horse flesh to exist.

The cuts that we see in today’s Britain, and on our public services might not send us back to the toughest days of the 19th century, however, David Cameron and George Osborne’s newfangled welfare state stinks of the 1800’s. To the Victorians, the poor deserved to be assisted, however, almost were doomed to the workhouse. These were the rules behind the workhouse because the conditions had to be so appalling that the needy would put themselves through any indignity, sooner than search help from the state.

It genuinely wasn’t much fun for Oliver Twist, because the workhouse wasn’t the only misery. The refusal to determine the free market meant that housing conditions were unhealthy, education was hopeless, air pollution was pernicious, and safety in the workplace a laugh.

Accidents happened to operatives who worked in rooms jammed full of machinery. The most usual trauma was the loss of a joint of the finger, and some would not only see numerous cripples, but also a great deal of workers who had lost the whole appendage.

It was thought back then that the poor were unemployed because they were just merely work-shy, and that children were born out of marriage because their parents were sinful. That drinking and depression were lifestyle options, and that uncleanliness was the wares of immorality and not poorness.

It seems that much has altered then…

The only divergence is that then the Victorians really thought it all to be true, now our government knows it’s not true, however, they allegedly entertain themselves with this sport inside their fraternity, whilst they make the poor fair game. Their power gives them that air of self-assurance, and they appear to be adept at whatever they do, but as they blunder about, fumbling from one victim to another, they play a game that is archaic and hostile.

All their statistics are contradictory, and it’s in utter disarray, however, that seems to be fine inside our government, but it’s not, it’s unacceptable, particularly when it involves poverty-stricken human lives. The state of this nation is shameful, and people of this country are now being considered as second-class citizens.

There are no indulgences any longer, and the human race has become a motive for a much larger design. We can’t see it yet, however, it’s been in front of our very eyes for many years, as the government maneuvers us, so that they can pull the wool over our very eyes. We are simply sheep herders that are being chaperoned along like fools by the so called brilliance of our government.

We are not fools, and some of us are not unfamiliar with what is really going on in our country, the same as it’s not inconceivable to stop what is going on, even though at the moment things appear intolerable, however, we are not inferior human beings, and as a community we can make this a better place, so long as we don’t carry on being sheep.

For access to unemployment benefit, to utilize the NHS, and claim Child Benefit, does not mean to say that you are monkeying around with the system. It signifies that the country can help out when times get hard, because it’s a worthwhile investment in our health care, education, and care for the future of this nation.

Now, that visual sense of community and citizenship is being sabotaged because no one is in favor of benefit cheats or incapacity loafers, however, cutting Child Benefit, cutting down social housing, and undermining the NHS is favorable, and could in fact take us back to the Victorian values.

We have civilized ourselves since the 19th century, and there is no call for David Cameron to take us back to the ethos of the Eton workhouse.

Russell Brand clashed with a news interviewer from Channel 4 News when the journalist demanded to know about the cost of his personal property. Earlier Russell had united with hundreds of residents of an East London estate so that they could march and demonstrate on Downing Street to protest against the threat of eviction.

Residents of the New Era estate in Hoxton, which was primitively constructed as low-cost housing for workers, state that they could face homelessness after US investment firm Westbrook Partners bought it out.

There have been 93 families that have been accounted for to face the legal ouster before Christmas. It’s social cleansing, which is pressuring the average working class people out of London.

The newsperson that was talking to Russell Brand outside Downing Street hinted that part of the housing trouble was that the super rich were purchasing property in London, and then the reporter asked Russell how much did he pay for his place.

Of course, Russell’s domicile is rented. However, Russell wasn’t there to speak about his home, he was there to protest against those that are about to lose theirs. Russell and the reporter then sparred for about 30 seconds before Garrett leaped in, angrily telling the broadcaster that at least Russell is standing up, irrespective of how large his house is, but the bigger picture really was when Garrett stated that David Cameron wasn’t even geared up to come out of his big house and help, but that at least Russell does.

Russell concluded the interview by telling the reporter that: “Snide’s like you undermine it… You’re a snide. ”

Even though Russell can be very disparaging at times, he is driven to get out there within the public.  He’s not just funny man, and he’s no fool, but he’s a human being with character, a soul, and most of all he worries what happens to the people of this country.

Russell might be one of the more affluent, but he is also a leader of the extreme, he knows what he wants, and he sets out to get it. It’s not about ambition, but it’s about the drive that pushes us along, and at least he has a vision. He has a connection to the human race!