Torture By Sadistic Wife

A ‘sadistic’ wife forced her husband to live in squalor with sixty chihuahuas, making him clean up their faeces barefoot and locking him in their kennel during a year-long campaign of torture, a Belgian court has heard.

Anna VDV, 47, emerged in the dock at Turnhout courthouse on Wednesday, crying as prosecutors laid out an extraordinary chronicle of barbarity allegedly foisted on the man she married in 2024.

The court was shown shocking photographs demonstrating what the prosecutor conveyed as the husband’s descent from ‘a healthy partner at the beginning of the relationship to a burned skeleton’.

The abuse only ended on March 18, when the victim managed to escape the home and desperately bashed on neighbours’ doors for help.

They found him hypothermic, confused and covered in injuries – prompting an urgent call to police, De Telegraaf reports.

Prosecutors said VDV attempted immediately to control the narrative, climbing into the ambulance and claiming her husband was depressed and had harmed himself.

Paramedics noticed the man tense up in her presence and ordered her to leave, the court heard. 

During the journey, the frightened victim initially said he had been beaten for a month – but later revealed the abuse had lasted a full year.

He told investigators he was assaulted daily with fists or objects until he collapsed. 

The couple’s home was reportedly overrun with sixty chihuahuas. The husband was expected to groom the dogs, clean their faeces barefoot and use caustic chemicals, the court heard.

VDV allegedly hid his shoes and installed cameras to watch him at all times. If he paused his cleaning, she would yell at him remotely to continue. He was not permitted to leave the house unless supervised.

‘That’s not work, it’s slavery,’ the prosecutor said.

The court heard VDV repeatedly locked her husband in a garden shed, dog run, kennel and even a pitch-black cellar without food or water.

Two weeks before his escape, she allegedly poured boiling water over him because two of the dogs had died, and she blamed him.

The victim was totally alone, jobless, in debt, and illiterate.

Prosecutors said VDV confiscated his mobile phone and cut off contact with his children. Neighbours noticed his injuries, but were told he was self-harming due to depression.

But VDV’s own phone reportedly told a different story – storing pictures of injuries, audio recordings of verbal abuse, video clips of her laughing as he struggled to dress himself, and messages barring him from contacting his daughters.

A medical report confirmed extensive wounds, burns, hypothermia and damage to subcutaneous tissue.

Long-term maltreatment is consistent with the fact that many injuries were older than five days.

Prosecutors have requested an eight-year prison term. The victim’s lawyer is seeking €10,000 in provisional damages.

VDV’s own lawyer, Romy Geysen, called it ‘the least sympathetic case of my entire career’, but argued her client recognises her wrongdoing and is ashamed. 

She blamed financial chaos, an exploding dog population and ‘relationship context’ for the abuse.

Geysen urged the court not to impose a long prison sentence, saying her client complied with all conditions following her release after three months in custody.

The verdict is due on January 7.

This man couldn’t read or write, so his wife had clearly been manipulating him because of his learning difficulties – not even animals do that to other animals. However, the female of the species can be deadlier than the male, though not as often.

I understand that this offence did not occur in the UK or any other country, other than Belgium, but first, the dogs should be neutered and adopted out. Secondly, this man needs someone to be assigned to him as his guardian, and third, he needs to divorce this psychopath.

She needs to go to prison for at least 15 years, no early release, no probation, nothing. Lastly, he should get everything she owns to do what he wants with it. Sell it, keep it, donate it or burn it. This woman is a dreadful human being.

She is just a terrible, deranged person, and what she did to this man is abhorrent.

Sadly, there is a lot of Domestic Violence against men, but men have nowhere to go – women are encouraged to fight back, but how does a man do that?

All I can really say to this is, be careful who you marry!

Labour Minister Defends Plans To Scrap Juries

A Labour minister has justified proposals to eliminate juries in some situations by arguing that judges who have received diversity training will perform “well.”

Following claims by Labour MPs that judges could be prejudiced, Baroness Levitt said she had ‘confidence in a professional judiciary’.

The Lord’s justice minister told peers that the ‘judiciary is becoming more diverse’ in response to concerns about the lack of diversity among judges.

‘It is not where we want it to be, but it is getting there,’ she said.

‘What it does have is extensive training in matters to do with issues of diversity, fairness and disproportionate impacts on particular sectors of the population.’

Her words came amid a huge outcry over measures suggested by Justice Secretary David Lammy to remove jury trials for some offences.

On Tuesday, Labour figures warned that the lack of diversity among judges could lead to those from minority or poorer backgrounds being discriminated against.

Former Labour grandee Dianne Abbott said the ‘entire House’ was concerned that members of the public ‘will undoubtedly suffer miscarriages of justice if the right to trial is curtailed’.

Labour MP Clive Efford told the Commons that he feared that restricting trial by jury ‘would put a certain class of people in judgment over the rest of us.’

His fellow Labour MP Stella Creasy added: ‘It is difficult to see how this measure – with all the challenges it may bring for justice and fairness, particularly for some of our minority communities – will address that backlog.’

Speaking in the Lords on Tuesday night, Baroness Levitt, a barrister who previously worked under Sir Keir Starmer, defended the plans.

She told peers: ‘I have been a criminal barrister for many decades.

‘When I practised as a criminal barrister, I too felt that any attempt to touch what happens with jury trials was fundamentally wrong.

‘However, I then became a judge in the Crown Court and saw what was actually happening.

‘Every judge in the crown court up and down this country will have experienced sitting with other judges at lunchtime and saying “I cannot believe that this case I am trying here and now is actually in the Crown Court. It shouldn’t be here.”

‘We are not sacrificing jury trials – of course, we are not.

‘It has never been that every criminal case was tried by a jury – 90 per cent are currently tried in the magistrates’ courts. The question is, where do we draw the line?’

She was responding to former Labour minister Lord Boateng, who said that juries were the best safeguard against an ‘overmighty and oppressive state’.

He told peers: ‘At the end of the day, are not random and conscientious people taken off the street the best safeguards of our civil liberties against an overmighty and oppressive state?

‘If any one of us here were to be charged with a criminal offence, would we not rather put our trust and confidence in a jury rather than in a state appointee? Are not juries the best way of linking ordinary people to our criminal justice system?’

Under the proposed amendments, jury trials will be discontinued for offences that carry a likely penalty of less than three years.

The most severe crimes, such as murder and rape, will continue to be dealt with by juries, along with lesser ‘either-way’ offences that carry more extended jail times.

Baroness Levitt was chief legal adviser to Sir Keir while he was director of public prosecutions, and she supervised the Crown Prosecution Service’s examination of its handling of the Jimmy Savile case.

Earlier this year, the PM put her up for a peerage.

There it is! The real truth behind Lammy’s plan. Judges with their ‘diversity training.’ Does this mean they will go easy on migrants, and is it a protection scam? What they don’t have is any common sense training.

How the hell is diversity training going to help? At the moment, they are letting more criminals out of prison than they are putting in. It’s a complete farce.

It’s pretty evident from where I’m sitting that judges can’t be entrusted with such important decisions – this is the reason we have juries, and even that’s not foolproof.

If judges have undergone diversity training, does it also suggest that they have been brainwashed? But then they would require a brain to start with.

There is nothing diverse about criminality. Either a person has committed a crime, or they haven’t.

When convicting somebody of a crime, the proof needs to be irrefutable (beyond doubt – the act of crime – something that has been seen with one’s own eyes – caught in the act of the crime – not just a reason to believe), because at the end of the day, justice is blind.

Denmark Scraps Letters

Denmark will end all national letter delivery at the end of December, marking a significant transformation in the country’s postal services.

The Danish postal service is stopping mail delivery due to a surprising drop in demand, with letter volume plunging by more than 90 per cent since the start of the century.

The decision also affects Denmark’s distinctive red mailboxes, with the government poised to remove them and exhibit them in museums.

In the future, only parcels will be delivered as the postal operator adjusts its business strategy to focus on parcel logistics.

The need for quicker package delivery has increased due to the dramatic growth in online shopping.

PostNord says the change is designed to ensure the company’s long-term viability.

‘We want to become the preferred parcel service for Danes,’ the company told Bild. This change in strategy is intended to make the company future-proof.

If someone wants to keep mailing letters, they will need to use branches of other private providers.

PostNord also confirmed that any postage stamps bought this year or in 2024 can be refunded for a limited period in 2026.

Pelle Dragsted, a Danish MP, has previously blamed the shift on privatisation and claimed that it will harm the elderly and those who live in distant locations.

The introduction of a new Postal Act in 2024 opened up the letter market to competition from private firms, and mail is no longer exempt from VAT, resulting in higher postage costs.

‘When a letter costs 29 Danish krone (£3.35) there will be fewer letters,’ PostNord Denmark’s Managing Director, Kim Pedersen, told local media in March.

Denmark’s action echoes a bigger global trend, with postal services globally experiencing financial strain as digital alternatives replace conventional letters.

The shift is evident elsewhere in Europe. According to the Federal Network Agency letter report, the number of letters sent is steadily declining.

The vast majority, about 95 per cent, comes from business customers such as companies and government agencies.

Private correspondence now represents only a slim amount of mail.

However, German postal authorities stress that there is no direct comparison.

Alexander Edenhofer, spokesman for the German DHL Group, told Bild: ‘The Danish postal service is not the German postal service. 

‘The two mail markets are only comparable to a limited extent. Despite declining volumes, letters remain important in Germany, and we expect to process and deliver letters for many years to come.’

Still, he acknowledges the challenges. ‘The news from Denmark shows how challenging the mail business has become,’ he added.

‘Digitisation is progressing rapidly, and mail volumes in Europe are shrinking quickly. This is putting a strain on all European postal service providers.’

In March, Germany’s Deutsche Post said it was axing 8,000 jobs, in what it called a ‘socially responsible manner.’

It’s not just postal workers who will lose their jobs, but card shops will be put out of business as well – eventually, everything will be done online, and there will be no high street retail shops; they will be a thing of the past in a dystopian world.

Simply put, we are being forced into a digital prison.

Royal Mail in the UK has now enforced policies to handle mail delivery, including not delivering or holding back letters when particular conditions are met.

If an item cannot fit through a letterbox or requires a signature, Royal Mail may attempt to redeliver it the following working day.

If no one is available to receive an item, Royal Mail will leave a ‘Something for you’ card and take the item back to the Customer Service Point. Items that cannot be delivered may be held at the Customer Service Point for a limited time before being sent back to the sender.

There are also instances where Royal Mail may prioritise parcels over letters, particularly during peak times like Christmas.

These practices reflect Royal Mail’s steps to manage mail delivery effectively, despite the challenges posed by a declining volume of letters.

As fewer and fewer letters are posted out, the unit costs go up, making it prohibitively more costly compared to electronic communication – this is a death spiral which has been on the wall for some time now.

Baby Dies In Hospital Due To Neglect, Underfed And In Damp Bedding

A four-week-old baby died after being left malnourished and dehydrated by overworked nurses on an understaffed neonatal intensive care unit, an inquest heard.

Lakshith Guptha Nalla died at the University Hospital of Wales in the early hours of May 11, 2024. Pontypridd Coroners’ Court heard the “vulnerable baby” was under-fed and left for hours lying on cold and damp bed sheets before he died.

Coroner Rachel Knight underlined a string of failures by medical staff in the previous days, and said the “persistent and gross understaffing” of the unit left the baby without food for four hours, meaning no one noticed he developed an infection or that he was lying on cold, wet bedding.

It was not until after it had been removed that they noticed that there were no new feeding lines on the ward at the time. This was due to their “chaotic” stocking systems and because a delivery had not turned up.

Ms Knight said: “I find it surprising that feeding tubes were not available on the biggest neonatal ward in Wales,” adding that they are a basic essential.

Nurse Mollo had to call Island Ward, which is around five minutes away, and take six from there. It was not until an hour and a half later that they actually got the tubes, which is when Nurse Mollo fitted the new one on baby Nalla.

But as she was “in a rush” to go and help deliver another baby, she mistakenly did not fit his feeding tube properly. She also did not inform anybody of the hours of feed he missed or conduct blood tests to ensure the hours without food had not affected his condition.

It was heard that “the staff on the ward were asked to do too many jobs during their shift” and they were made to look after twice the number of patients they should be looking after in the NICU.

As well as no food, baby Nalla’s paperwork was also missing in parts, including, most crucially, any observations between 4 pm and 5 pm on May 9, reported WalesOnline.

At around 4 pm, another nurse realised that baby Nalla “seemed different.” Blood samples were taken, and the results were described as “worrying” as he was found to be hypoglycaemic and to be suffering from metabolic and respiratory acidosis. He was also found to be cold.

At 6 pm, staff noticed baby Nalla was not connected to his feed properly and hadn’t been for the past four hours. They saw his feeding tube was leaking and that “he was lying on cold, wet bed sheets”.

The court heard that the impact of this period with no feed would have impeded the baby’s ability to fight off any infection, as he was using his own reserves, which were extremely limited due to his vulnerability and his size.

The survival rate of sepsis in premature babies is around 25-30 per cent, and so even less for baby Nalla, who was trying to fight it alongside two other conditions – all while being hypoglycaemic, malnourished, dehydrated, and cold.

Ms Knight described baby Nalla’s care as “wholly inadequate” due to the failures and missed opportunities, most notably where he went four hours with no feed. She said his lack of care in the days before his death was an “unfortunate coincidence” and added the issue of neglect could not be legally made out by a very narrow margin.

The child’s cause of death was given as sepsis, peritonitis, and necrotising enterocolitis. No evidence being fed as prescribed could have saved baby Nalla.

Ms Knight came to a narrative conclusion for baby Nalla’s death. The conclusion stated: “Baby Nalla was born at 30 weeks and four days gestation with a congenital condition that required surgery. This surgery was undertaken the day after he was born, and he was making a full recovery.

“Baby Nalla should have been nursed at a one-to-one ratio as per the guidelines. Due to staffing levels on the ward and missing equipment, he was not nursed to the standard he should have been and was not fed at all for four hours.

“He was showing signs of necrotising enterocolitis, which is likely his cause of death. There is insufficient evidence that the complications surrounding baby Nalla’s feed contributed to his death.”

With regard to the prevention of future deaths, Ms Knight said she was satisfied with the health board’s changes to stocking and staffing at the NICU. The health board is expected to be sending Ms Knight a letter further outlining these changes.

Baby Nalla’s father said in a statement read to the court earlier in the hearing that he and his family had dreamed of a life in the UK, which is why they moved to Cardiff, but after losing their son, they have moved back to India. He asked for his son’s body to be donated to science in the hope it may prevent the same thing from happening to other babies.

This poor baby was at such high risk and should have been given the highest care.

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) nurses do not deliver babies. 
Their primary function is to deliver specialised care to babies who are premature, sick, or need intensive medical attention. While they may assist in emergencies or during scheduled cesarean sections. The emphasis is on the newborns. Why was this nurse needed at a delivery, and why wasn’t another nurse sent?

These were undoubtedly understaffed nurses, but aren’t babies in such critical condition meant to be monitored 24 hours a day, just like an adult in the ICU? Something seems off here.

In this case, the baby may not have made it anyway, but his parents will always wonder, and it’s bad enough to have the heartbreak of losing a child, but to also know that not everything was done to help this child, and also to find out that your baby spent his last hours cold, wet and hungry is simply appalling.

Wales Village Faces Backlash After Plaid Cymru Proposes English Ban

A picturesque Welsh beach community is at the centre of an anti-English tempest amid claims Plaid Cymru councillors want to prevent English families from moving into its houses.

Councillors on the island of Anglesey have claimed people living in council houses in England have swapped homes via Facebook so they can move to picturesque Aberffraw. 

They also said it has led to empty homes in the tourist village, known for its long sandy beach, and could have a devastating effect on the Welsh language.

The claims have shocked numerous residents who have criticised the councillors for whipping up anti-English feeling and insist the claims are ‘nonsense’.

However, others have admitted there is resentment towards the English in the area.

Dog walker Emlyn Jones, 58, said: ‘There is anti-English feeling because there are too many second homes here.

‘It doesn’t feel like you’re in Wales anymore as there are so many English here.

‘A lot of Welsh people can’t afford to buy houses where they’re from, as the English have come in with more money.

‘They have pushed up the prices. I agree with what the councillors have said, but I don’t think anything will change.

‘We don’t want more English people here.’

Other residents rubbished the councillors’ claims that council houses have been swapped between England and Wales, but admit there are anti-English feelings.

Mother-of-one Jean Owen, 64, said: ‘You do get people in the village complaining about there being too many English here.

‘They say things like: “The English are taking over”.

‘People grumble about them, but it’s generally just the nationalists.

‘I don’t agree with what these councillors are saying.

‘I think it’s disgusting they are trying to cause divisions with the English.

‘It’s all a load of rubbish – they’re taking nonsense.

‘I know a lady who swapped her house for someone living here, but she was from a different part of Wales.

‘She was living in an isolated area, was lonely – now she’s come here, she goes to coffee mornings and things and is a lot happier.

‘I don’t know of any English who have come here after swapping council houses with locals.

‘These councillors don’t have any common sense.’

Councillor Arfon Wyn told a recent meeting of Anglesey County Council: ‘There are a lot of homes still empty in Aberffraw, that are meant to be rented out to people who really need homes.

‘One thing that concerns me is that people in the nice areas on the coast, so to speak, can swap homes with people in towns in England on Facebook.

‘I know it is something to do with the government, unfortunately, but there are also homes that have been empty for quite a while in Aberffraw.

‘We have had a few enquiries about this from the public and people in the area.

‘These two things concern me, especially in my area, where there are nice places to retire to, and so on; the impact on the Welsh language can be significant.’

A council house or housing association tenant can exchange homes with other social tenants through the mutual exchange scheme.

If Aberffraw has vacant council houses, why aren’t the locals offered them?

Anywhere else, and this would be labelled racist. Imagine if English councillors argued that a Welsh family should be prevented from residing in England, and just because the Welsh were born there, it doesn’t mean they own the island.

There are, unfortunately, too many people who like to cause trouble. Enough is going on in this world without a silly little squabble like this. They need to give their heads a little wobble.

Germany Protests

Thousands of enraged demonstrators flocked to the western city of Giessen, where the hard-right AfD party held its founding convention on Saturday, as the party unveiled its new youth organisation.

Many delegates were delayed in arriving because demonstrators stopped or attempted to block highways entering the city, causing the conference to start more than two hours late.

Dramatic images show protesters clashing with police, who were forced to use pepper spray after stones were thrown at officers in one location, authorities said. 

Police also deployed water cannons to clear a blockade of about 2,000 protesters who ignored calls to disperse.

On Saturday afternoon, they made use of them once more when a group tried to breach barriers surrounding the city’s conference centre.

Up to 5,000 officers were deployed, police said. They estimated more than 25,000 demonstrators had gathered, noting that much of the protest remained peaceful. Ten officers were reported slightly injured. 

When the meeting eventually got underway, AfD officials denounced the protests.

‘What is being done out there – dear left-wingers, dear extremists, you need to look at yourselves – is something that is deeply undemocratic,’ party co-leader Alice Weidel said.

She added that one AfD lawmaker had been attacked. Police confirmed a lawmaker was injured near Giessen but gave no details.

The new youth organisation, named Generation Germany, replaces the Young Alternative – a primarily autonomous group with loose ties to the party – which was formally disbanded in March after AfD cut ties with it.

The party says it wants much tighter oversight of the new body, which will be open to all AfD members under 36. Its statute was approved on Saturday.

AfD finished second in Germany’s national election in February with more than 20 per cent of the vote and is now the largest opposition party.

As Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s coalition fails to gain public trust, the AfD has continued to surge in opinion surveys despite the refusal of mainstream parties to cooperate with it.

Germany’s domestic intelligence agency had previously designated the Young Alternative a proven right-wing extremist group. 

Later, it gave AfD the same designation; however, following a court challenge, that designation was revoked.

A Cologne court ruling last year found that the Young Alternative promoted preserving an ‘ethnically defined German people’ and banning the ‘ethnically foreign’, and pointed to agitation against migrants and ties to extremist movements such as the Identitarian Movement.

Following the dissolution of the Young Alternative, a higher court terminated the appeal procedure in June.

AfD’s other co-leader, Tino Chrupalla, told delegates the party must learn from past mistakes.

‘Some benefited from the young and their ability to mobilise, but didn’t have the future of this youth sufficiently in sight,’ he said.

‘We should have taken more care of the young new hopes in our party; it will be different in future.’

He added that young activists must ‘put themselves at the party’s service’.

In German politics, youth wings are prevalent and frequently more radical than their parent parties. Although much consistency is anticipated, it remains uncertain whether AfD’s new organisation will be more moderate than its predecessor.

These young demonstrators have every right to voice their opposition to the resurgence of fascism in Germany.

But mass migration is intentional, and its prevalence is comparable across all Western nations. The purpose is to wreck the economies; therefore, why in the UK we have seen both placed administrations prove to be totally inept while fleecing the people.

Can you really blame these young individuals, though? No, since nothing will be done about it by our governments.

Countries with mass migration are now deprived because our governments and rich corporations have manipulated us, but now, when we make a stand because we are worried about our future, we are branded ‘extremists’, and young people are now rising because governments are not listening.

People are genuinely frightened, and we are sick of our wives and girlfriends being scared and not being able to walk the streets in case they are attacked by these migrants who have no control over their urges, but this is what happens when our government lays down the welcome mat for everybody to turn up.

Was Marilyn Monroe REALLY murdered after having affairs with President Kennedy and his brother?

They were words that would prove to be quite prophetic.

‘I was the kind of girl they found dead in a hall bedroom with an empty bottle of sleeping pills in her hand.’

That is what Marilyn Monroe, the world’s most celebrated woman, told a journalist in 1954 – eight years before she died in remarkably similar circumstances from a seeming overdose of barbiturates.

More than 60 years on, a cloud of mystery continues to hang over the death of the Hollywood celebrity, model and global sex symbol.

Three times married and three times divorced, Monroe was, in her final weeks, a woman in chaos, an idol defeated by the crushing weight of her own stardom.

But did she really take her own life by overdosing on barbiturates at the age of just 36, or is the reality much darker?

Was she killed for threatening to reveal the secrets of her two most powerful lovers, US President John F. Kennedy and his brother Bobby, the Attorney General?

New book The Last Days of Marilyn Monroe, by mega-selling author James Patterson and co-writer Imogen Edwards-Jones, details the unanswered questions and alleged suspicious circumstances encompassing Monroe’s demise on August 4, 1962.

Monroe allegedly had a ‘violent argument’ with Bobby Kennedy at her home in Los Angeles, California, on the day she died, accusing him of abandoning her.

And Sergeant Jack Clemmons, the policeman who came to Monroe’s home after she was found dead, said it was ‘the most obviously staged death scene I had ever seen’.

Further, in a 1985 interview on the BBC with investigative journalist Anthony Summers, Monroe’s housekeeper Eunice Murray, who found her dead, had said cryptically words to the effect of, ‘Why do I have to keep covering this up’.

As for her post-mortem, that was not done by the chief medical examiner but instead carried out by a junior counterpart, who subsequently revealed that he did not do the entire range of organ tests that would normally have been expected.

Hinting that there may have been foul play, Patterson said in a recent interview with the Hollywood Reporter: ‘I think that she was treading in very dangerous waters.

‘She had these incredible relationships with President Kennedy, and with Robert Kennedy, and with [Frank] Sinatra, and with Mafia figures.

‘They told her stuff, and she kept track of it. She had information that was kind of dangerous.’

He added: ‘I didn’t know much about the death scene, about the autopsy not being as complete as it should have been, that one of the detectives was convinced the scene was staged.’

News of the death of Monroe, the star of films including Some Like It Hot and a bedroom pin-up for millions of young men, was front-page news worldwide.

In his tribute, acting titan Sir Laurence Olivier, who starred alongside Monroe in his 1957 romantic comedy The Prince and the Showgirl, spoke for many.

‘Marilyn was the complete victim of ballyhoo and sensationalism,’ he said.

‘She could be incredibly sweet, most tenderly appealing and very, very witty.

‘Her end is dreadfully and shockingly sad, but popular opinion and all that goes to promote it is a horribly unsteady conveyance for life, and she was exploited beyond anyone’s means.’

The last several months of Monroe’s life had been turbulent and humiliating.

The star had, for years, been dependent on a cocktail of drugs, was chronically depressed and had undergone surgery for endometriosis.

In May 1962, she made international headlines and sparked a surge of affair speculation when she serenaded President Kennedy at his 45th birthday celebrations at Madison Square Garden.

The following month, Monroe – now notorious for her perceived lack of professionalism – was sacked from the production of Something’s Got to Give, which would turn out to be the last film she worked on.

Much of the suspicion surrounding Monroe’s demise hinges on the claims of former vice detective Fred Otash, who said he was ordered to conceal a surveillance microphone in the star’s house.

The original tapes of the alleged recorded conversations were said to have gone missing soon after Monroe was discovered dead.

According to Otash, the tapes prove that Bobby Kennedy went with his brother-in-law, the English actor Peter Lawford, to Monroe’s home on the day she died.

There, according to Patterson’s account of Otash’s claims, a ‘highly emotional’ Monroe demanded ‘an explanation as to why Kennedy was not going to marry her’.

‘According to Otash, it is “a violent argument about their relationship and the commitment and promises Bobby made to her. She said she was passed around like a piece of meat.”

Kennedy was then alleged to have lost his temper and said he would not leave until he got Monroe’s ‘little red book, where she kept all her notes about “political things” she discussed with him and, before him, his brother.’ 

Otash reported: ‘She was screaming. Bobby gets the pillow, and he muffles her on the bed to keep the neighbours from hearing. 

‘She finally quieted down, and then he was looking to get out of there.’

Monroe then allegedly took some pills to calm down before having rambling phone conversations about “betrayals… men in high places… clandestine love affairs.”

She was said to have told one caller: ‘I know a lot of secrets about the Kennedys. Dangerous ones.’

To another, she claimed to have news that ‘will one day shock the whole world’.

Monroe was supposed to have dinner at Lawford’s home on the night she passed away. 

However, the star’s slurred speech, which sounded like she was high, startled him when he called her later.

She cryptically told him: ‘Say goodbye to Pat, say goodbye to the president, and say goodbye to yourself, because you’re a nice guy.’

In the early hours of August 5, Monroe’s housekeeper woke abruptly, worried that something was not right.

Mrs Murray tried to enter her boss’s room after getting out of bed, but she discovered the door was locked.

She called Dr Ralph Greenson, Monroe’s psychiatrist, now quite concerned.

Mrs Murray then looked through Monroe’s bedroom window, according to her version of events.

There she saw the star on her bed, lying naked on her back. Her hand was still holding her telephone.

Dr Greenson then arrived, broke the window with a poker and climbed into Monroe’s bedroom. 

Revealing what happened next, Patterson writes: ‘He leans over Marilyn and presses gently on the side of her slim neck. Please, God, let there be a pulse. 

‘He presses harder. The flesh feels tepid, not as warm as he would like. Maybe there is something? There! Then he realises it’s his own pounding heartbeat. 

“We’ve lost her!” he cries out, his knees buckling beneath him.’

Dr Greenson then saw the numerous pill bottles and a trail of white tablets on the carpet. A 50-capsule bottle of the sedative Nembutal was empty. 

One pill every night is the typical dosage.

Sergeant Clemmons arrived shortly before 5 am. When he examined Monroe’s body, he was instantly suspicious.

The new book continues: ‘Marilyn’s legs are perfectly straight. Her face is buried in a pillow. He’d like to get a look at her mouth, check for signs of foam or vomit. 

‘Suicides are usually messier than this. The normal signs of distress or struggle are not present.’

Speaking of why he believed the scene was staged, he said: ‘The pill bottles on her table had been arranged in neat order, and the body was deliberately positioned.’ 

Although Sergeant Clemmons was later criticised for being an unreliable witness, Mrs Murray’s account was also contested.

When she spoke with Summers in 1985, she was asked what she meant when she said words to the effect of, ‘Why do I have to keep covering this up?’

She replied: ‘Well, of course Bobby Kennedy was there.’

Summers said of the conversation: ‘I asked her what she meant, and she then astonished us by admitting that Robert Kennedy had indeed visited Marilyn on the day she died, and that a doctor and an ambulance had come while she was still alive.

‘It became so sticky that the protectors of Robert Kennedy, you know, had to step in and protect him…’

Dr Thomas Noguchi performed Monroe’s post-mortem rather than his more experienced colleague.

Patterson and Ms Edward-Jones write of Dr Noguchi: ‘He detects neither needle marks, indicating a drug injection, nor signs of physical violence. 

‘The autopsy confirms blood toxic with barbiturates and a stomach empty of food particles, even the yellow dye that coats Nembutal capsules.

‘But he never performs the full range of organ tests. He admits later: “I didn’t follow through as I should have.”

It was later claimed that Dr Greenson prescribed Monroe a chloral hydrate enema and that it was this medication, when mixed with Nembutal, that killed her.

Then, according to the claim, Dr Greenson and Dr Hyman Engelberg, Monroe’s personal physician, staged the star’s death as suicide amid fear of the consequences should they be blamed for her death. 

However, the allegations that Monroe was killed to prevent her from discussing the Kennedy brothers have persisted.

In a 1995 interview, Monroe’s close friend Sidney Guilaroff said he had spoken to her on the phone just hours before she died.

‘Marilyn telephoned me and was in an absolute state. She said, “Bobby Kennedy was here, and he threatened me, screamed at me, and pushed me around!”

‘I think I said something like “What was Robert Kennedy doing at your house?”, because I couldn’t believe my ears.

‘I knew absolutely nothing about her affair with Bobby, and I thought I knew everything. 

‘I knew about Jack, but then she told me she’d had an affair with Bobby as well.

‘Everything had gone wrong. Now she was afraid and felt she was in terrible danger.

‘Bobby felt she had become a problem and had said to her: “If you threaten me, Marilyn, there’s more than one way to keep you quiet.”

Sinatra himself is said to have been convinced that Monroe had been murdered.

Tony Oppedisano, his former manager and close friend, wrote in his 2021 memoir: ‘Frank believed she was murdered, and he never got over it.’

However, in the 1980s, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office opened an inquiry into Monroe’s death as unanswered questions stirred.

The then district attorney, John Van de Kamp, told the Los Angeles Times: ‘Based on the evidence available to us, it appears that her death could have been a suicide or a result of an accidental drug overdose.’

Investigators at the time said murder would have required a ‘massive, in place conspiracy’ that would have involved, ‘the actual killer or killers; the chief medical examiner coroner; the autopsy surgeon to whom the case was fortuitously assigned; and most all of the police officers assigned to the case, as well as their superiors.’

The authorities added: ‘Our inquiries and document examination uncovered no credible evidence supporting a murder theory.’

Many people thought Marilyn Monroe had been murdered, and since not everyone could be mistaken, someone had to be correct. After all, she was quite knowledgeable about a number of powerful individuals.

If she was threatening to expose both the Kennedy brothers, what was she going to disclose? It must have been something worth killing for.

Was there really any uncertainty, after all? Frank Sinatra mingled with a lot of shady characters while he was alive, so if he thought she was murdered, then perhaps she was, but we will never really know for sure; it’s just all conjecture, and always will be.

Somebody, or many, knew the truth, but if it was the Kennedy’s they had to be protected. In this day and age, it frankly makes Clinton and Trump look like choirboys.

Marilyn was, of course, an incredibly troubled woman, and she was taken advantage of by powerful men. Once they’d finished playing with her, and had no use for her anymore, she had to go, although she could have sold her story for a lot of money, but all she really wanted was to be loved. However, humans can be evil monsters; it’s that simple, they take what they want and then toss it away.

DWP Is Scrapping Benefits

The Department for Work and Pensions intends to visit the homes of thousands of claimants to advise them that one benefit will be eliminated.

Employment and Support Allowance claimants will switch to Universal Credit under the controlled migration program. Claimants usually have three months from the date of the notice to file their application after obtaining a Migration Notice; after that, benefits stop.

The DWP has promised, nonetheless, that it would not end ESA without contacting claimants once more. The DWP Visiting Team will be in touch to arrange a visit and give information about what to anticipate, including contact information. A letter of confirmation will be sent out, but if the visit is planned at short notice, it can happen before the letter gets there.

If the visit is to take place at your home and you’ve supplied a mobile number, the team will also confirm the booking through text message. Before the visit, the DWP Visiting Team will provide details about the date and time of the visit, which can be rescheduled if necessary.

They will also notify you of the location of the visit, how to reach the Visiting Team, who will be visiting you, provide the visiting officer’s name, what identification documents you’ll need to give before the visit can commence, and security and safety measures for the visit.

They will also guide you on what information you need to provide to the DWP about your income, savings and health, reports Birmingham Live. The duration of these support visits can vary, and it’s not possible to predict how long each visit will take.

If you have any queries, you can contact the DWP Visiting Team before the visit. The DWP explains: “The visiting officer will present their photo identity card upon arrival. You can then verify if the visiting officer named in the letter you received about the visit is the same person.

“If you are unable to check their photo identity card (for example, due to a visual impairment), you can agree on a password for the visiting officer to use when they arrive. This needs to be arranged before the visit by contacting the DWP Visiting Team.

“You can also confirm their identity by calling the number provided in the letter or text message, and providing the visiting officer’s name.”

It simply becomes more and more daft. We are all aware that some people attempt to circumvent the system, but they will undoubtedly never be discovered. This is similar to the days of the National Assistant, when they would unexpectedly drop by and accuse you of working if you didn’t answer the door because you were sick or merely out shopping.

And who is footing the bill for all these door-knockers? The taxpayer, of course. I would advise the DWP to go knock on the hotels first and deal with those who have arrived by boat.

People are coming over on boats and receiving handout after handout, but sadly, the majority of them seem to be either involved in crime or send all of their money back to their families in their home countries. It seems to me that the sick, disabled, and elderly are treated as a burden on society and surplus to requirements.

Patients With Fibromyalgia Are Left In Agony

Sufferers of a chronic pain condition are being left in agony because of a ‘cruel’ prohibition on drugs by NHS chiefs, campaigners have claimed.

Fibromyalgia patients – who endure body-wide pain, muscle stiffness and headaches – had been offered strong painkillers, including pregabalin and tramadol. But recent guidance on the management of chronic pain by the NHS spending watchdog, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), has banned their use.

Patients are also being denied NHS-approved non-drug therapies that are proven to work, including a water-based treatment called hydrotherapy, as local health chiefs won’t fund it, claims Des Quinn, chair of Fibromyalgia Action UK.

He claims that a change in NHS rules regarding painkillers is a ‘major step backwards in the treatment of fibromyalgia’.

Mr Quinn adds: ‘Patients’ quality of life is being reduced as a result. Drugs such as tramadol are backed by good scientific evidence, which NICE failed to consider.’

It is not known what causes fibromyalgia, which affects more than two million people in the UK. The condition tends to develop between the ages of 25 and 55 and, alongside pain, patients report difficulty concentrating and digestive problems.

There is presently no treatment, and some research indicates that it may be brought on by an illness, an accident, or a time of mental stress.

Pop sensation Lady Gaga and Oscar-winning actor Morgan Freeman are two well-known victims.

Before 2021, NICE had no clear guidelines for fibromyalgia, but told doctors to follow the rules for nerve pain. These recommended that patients were offered painkillers, including the now-barred drugs.

A report by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology concluded that the balance of evidence was in favour of the use of medications such as pregabalin and tramadol.

However, increasing numbers of Britons becoming addicted to these painkillers – as well as a concern that they were not effective in all patients – forced health chiefs to crack down on prescriptions.

One of Britain’s top fibromyalgia specialists, Dr Deepak Ravindran of the Royal Berkshire Hospital, says the banned painkillers are being held to too high a standard.

He also adds that a wider range of treatments should be available because the causes of fibromyalgia are so diverse. Other permitted treatments include exercise plans and cognitive behavioural therapy. Hydrotherapy should also be offered to help improve musculoskeletal symptoms, but patients are finding it increasingly difficult to gain access to a pool due to closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the NHS is failing those who suffer from fibromyalgia, a chronic pain illness. According to a recent study, individuals were administered dangerous medications, underwent needless testing, and waited years for a diagnosis.

Researchers at Aberdeen University said some doctors were even refusing to refer patients and dismissing them as “lazy”.

The senior consultant who conducted the UK-wide research is now calling on the NHS to overhaul its care of fibromyalgia patients.

The Scottish government said it would continue to work closely with the NHS to improve how services are accessed and delivered.

Fibromyalgia causes pain all over the body and can bring on extreme exhaustion, and some estimates suggest one in 20 people may have the illness.

By sharing their own stories, celebrities like singer Lady Gaga and journalist Kirsty Young have brought attention to the problem. There isn’t a treatment.

For those who have it, fibromyalgia is a daily battle.

For most, they start with a daily cocktail of painkillers for chronic full-body pain, fatigue and brain fog, and it’s truly hard to put in a box because it’s different every day. It’s muscular pain that can be dull or throbbing, and it can be really intense as well, like somebody jabbing you with a screwdriver, and it’s burning.

Most people stress about what the remainder of their lives is going to be like.

For most, the mornings are slow because they’re trying to realise how they are feeling at that point – what they’ve got to do in that day, and what they can call off if it is extremely bad.

Some people claim that having fibromyalgia hurts worse than giving birth.

There are days when these people are in so much pain, they don’t move off the sofa, apart from going to the bathroom.

Many are on extremely strong painkillers and medications, including Tramadol, but even that doesn’t stop all the pain – next stop, Morphine.

However, there are many people, including doctors, who doubt Fibromyalgia. All I can say about this is if you don’t believe these people are extremely sick, then I seriously hope you don’t ever have to walk a step in their shoes, because quite frankly, it really is no fun at all.

There is no miracle cure for Fibromyalgia; it’s just all a guessing game, and sometimes it’s easier to vilify an illness that you know nothing about than to agree it actually exists, because then the experts would have to do something about it.

People suffer because of this debilitating illness – there is no cure, they know that, but sometimes it’s just nice to know that somebody is listening instead of dismissing.

Should Rachel Reeves Resign?

Rachel Reeves encountered enraged calls to resign last night after being accused of ‘lying’ to the nation in the run-up to the Budget.

The Chancellor was informed months ago that there was no gap in the public finances, the fiscal watchdog disclosed Wednesday in an unusual step.

But even before her announcement on Wednesday, Ms Reeves had been issuing dire warnings about the state of the economy.

She even opened the door to an income tax hike in an unprecedented early-morning speech, all while plotting a mammoth welfare giveaway in her ‘Benefits Street Budget’.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the Office for Budget Responsibility’s revelation showed Ms Reeves had ‘lied to the public’ and she should be sacked.

Now you can have your say on the Chancellor’s position in the Daily Mail’s latest poll of the day. 

Rachel Reeves should most definitely resign – she has lied to us all, and she is the worst Chancellor ever! However, it’s not just Reeves that has lied, the whole damn lot of them lie all the time – they should all resign and a General Election should be called for.

Perhaps she should go to jail, directly to jail without collecting any money, but of course, she won’t because the gravy train is far too attractive, and what irritates me the most is that after all the damage she has done, the amount of businesses she has helped to close, and the amount of financial distress she has piled onto so many people, she will simply waltz off into the sunset, a multmillionaire with an enormous pension.

All government employees should be sacked if they have been proven to have deceived or lied, full stop, and she should be sacked.

With Labour, lying appears to be the norm; even if the truth were to strike them in the face, they wouldn’t recognise it.

Politics in this country is broken, not because disagreements exist, but because accountability doesn’t.

Leaders who view the truth as a responsibility rather than an annoyance are what the public deserves, and we urgently need a full debate in the House of Commons on honesty and integrity in public life.

Our elected officials have no right to lecture the rest of us about responsibility if they are unable to uphold the most basic requirement of being truthful.

The deterioration of trust in politics is not an accident; it’s the inescapable consequence of a culture where evasion is rewarded, scrutiny is circumvented, and ‘politicking’ has become a justification for behaviour that would get anyone else sacked.

Rachel Reeves is a loose cannon who laughs in the face of respectable people while attempting to deceive.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started