She Had A Bright Future

The parents of a baby killed by a ‘callous’ nursery worker said they could ‘never forgive’ her as she faces a lengthy jail term for their daughter’s manslaughter.

John and Katie Meehan spoke for the first time about the loss of their nine-month-old daughter Genevieve Meehan, known as ‘Gigi’ after jurors found Kate Roughley guilty of killing her.

Roughley is due to receive a maximum sentence of life imprisonment over the ‘ill-treatment’ of Genevieve, who was left for over 90 minutes before being found ‘unresponsive and blue’.

The 37-year-old worker from Heaton Norris, Stockport, was said to have ignored the ‘serious and obvious’ risks of strapping a baby face down on a bean bag to sleep.

Speaking about Manchester Crown Court today, barrister Mr Meehan said: ‘We will never forgive the callousness of Kate Roughley’s actions. She was entrusted with the care of or our daughter but instead, she treated her with contempt.’

Mr Meehan stood with his tearful solicitor wife Katie and paid tribute to their daughter, who ‘loved life, played the tambourine, and spent time with her big sister’, and was ‘kind, infectious, and mischievous’.

‘We loved every day watching her develop. We’ll never accept the cruelty of her life being taken away,’ he said. ‘Her life was full of promise and wonder, and it was taken.

‘Genevieve’s loss has destroyed our family and we grieve for her every day. We’re desperate to see her smile, see her laugh and feel her warm embrace.’

Mr Meehan said he and his wife do not want to see her defined by the manner of Genevieve’s death and that ‘our beautiful daughter deserves to be remembered for the wonderful person she was.’

During a month-long trial, jurors heard Roughley displayed a ‘lack of sympathy’ towards children, labelling Genevieve ‘vile’, a ‘whinger’ and a ‘diva’.

CCTV cameras showed her disregarding the child’s cries and frantic last-ditch attempts to live while the child was forcibly fastened to the bean bag and wrapped in a blanket.

Roughley, who had 17 years’ experience as a nursery worker but no children of her own, then ‘lied’ to cover up what she’d done, claiming she constantly checked on babies in her care. 

The prosecution said Roughley’s ‘deliberate conduct’, ‘ill-treatment’ and ‘lack of any effective monitoring’ causing Genevieve’s death.

After more than five hours of deliberation, the Manchester Crown Court jury gave their verdicts, and Roughley looked forward without displaying any emotion.

Mrs Justice Ellen Bogan adjourned sentencing until Wednesday and remanded Roughley, whose parents were at the back of court, in custody until then.

Mrs Meehan and other family members emotionally hugged outside court and thanked the prosecution.

Manchester Crown Court heard Genevieve suffered fatal asphyxia and pathophysiological stress caused by the ‘unsafe sleep environment’ at Tiny Toes Nursery in Cheadle Hulme, Stockport, on May 9, 2022.

During the trial, Peter Wright KC, prosecuting, told the jury: ‘Her death was not the result of some terrible or unavoidable accident.

‘We say her death arose from ill-treatment she suffered at the hands of this defendant.’

On the day of tragedy, deputy manager Roughley was acting as leader in the nursery’s understaffed baby room, where she was one of only two workers looking after 11 babies.

Genevieve had been dropped off by her parents, barrister John Meehan and solicitor Katie Wheeler, at 9 am and was found unresponsive at 3.12 pm. She could not be revived and was later pronounced dead in hospital.

Mr Wright said the reason for the baby’s condition wasn’t immediately apparent but became clear from CCTV footage.

He added that Roughley had put Genevieve to sleep that afternoon, wrapping her in a blanket so tightly that she was immobile.

The child had also been placed not on her back, according to safe sleep policies, but on her front and face down, strapped to a bean bag using a harness.

A blanket was also placed over her that practically covered her head to toe, with the ‘inevitable consequence’ that it would make observations more difficult and increase the risk of overheating.

He said Genevieve was visibly ‘distressed by this treatment’ yet her thrashing and cries were ignored and she was left from around 1.35 pm until she was discovered unresponsive—an hour and 37 minutes later.

Mr Wright said: ‘The risk to her of asphyxiation and death was, we say, both serious and obvious.

‘Yet the defendant ignored it and by the time she checked on Genevieve with anything vaguely representing any genuine interest, it was too late.’

The jury heard how the baby had been enrolled at the nursery just a few weeks earlier in April after she ‘thrived’ despite being born prematurely at 35 weeks.

Genevieve had been treated in hospital for bronchiolitis, which is common in young infants, and was using an inhaler but expert witnesses said the condition was not a factor in her death.

Mr Wright said that in the days leading up to the tragedy, Roughley had displayed a ‘lack of affection’ towards Genevieve that was ‘not merely visible, but tangible’.

On the day of Genevieve’s death, Roughley had used the bean bag as a ‘form of restraint’, Mr Wright said, ignoring safety advice never to place babies face down.

Under cross-examination during the trial, Roughley insisted: ‘I would never not like a nine-month-old baby. To say I disliked her is far from the truth.’

Asked if she thought that Genevieve’s death was avoidable, she said: ‘I feel that if I had checked on her a couple of seconds or minutes earlier, it may have been different.

‘It was a common practice for children to sleep in the bean bag bed.

‘I feel responsible in the fact that Genevieve was in my care that day. However, I don’t feel my actions were the reason for the death.’

She denied that calling Genevieve a ‘whinger’ and ‘a diva’ was ‘malicious’.

Roughley said: ‘Often we would say to children ‘stop whingeing’ This was not shouted at the children or said in any malicious way. They were just passing comments through the working day.’

Sarah Elliot KC, defending, told the jury Roughley looked after children in a ‘practical, responsible, no-nonsense but caring way’.

She said the defendant denied failing to make safe sleep arrangements and had ‘kept an appropriate eye’ on Genevieve.

Nine-month-old babies are not swaddled; only newborns are. It is not appropriate to strap a baby down for anything other than high chair or pram use! And why weren’t there any more cots? The proprietors of the nurseries must have been aware that the number of newborns whose parents pay a high price for their care required more than their equipment could accommodate.

Why on earth would you swaddle a child that age? Why on earth would you restrict any movement, it’s natural for them to move and unnatural to prevent it.

Newborns can’t control their movements when they’re born and often disturb themselves when they’re sleeping. Supposedly, swaddling keeps them snug as they are in the womb, but when they’re born, they should be allowed to move around freely.

To have to deal with their child’s shocking mistreatment and eventual death at the hands of this woman would be enough to rock the foundations of any loving parent. I do feel bad for the parents, who were both working to provide a better life for their child, paying handsomely in the belief that their child was being cared for with kitten gloves.

Accidents happen, I know that, but this was not an accident; rather, it appeared to be the inevitable result of blatantly nasty and deliberate disregard and abuse of the woman’s position.

The toddler was disturbed and sobbing on a bean bag for ninety minutes while being fastened face down. Abuse, plain and simple, was the cause of this.

This was poor practice and I wonder how many other children had been subjected to this treatment, but were lucky they did not have the same fate. The loss of a child is something no parent ever gets over, and more so when it could have been avoided.

This could not have been the woman’s first instance of abusing a child in this way. She did something inappropriate out of a fit of rage. The same is true with senior care facilities—there are many unscrupulous ones out there.

NHS’ Worst Treatment Disaster: Rishi Sunak To Apologize

Rishi Sunak will apologise to infected-blood victims, as a devastating report blames successive governments and the NHS for the scandal.

The Prime Minister will issue a formal apology on behalf of the Government for the handling of a scandal which has claimed more than 3,000 lives and continues to wreck countless others.

Plans for a major compensation programme that may end up costing taxpayers more than £10 billion will be unveiled by ministers.

According to insiders in Whitehall, NHS head Amanda Pritchard is expected to apologise for the greatest treatment scandal in the health service’s history.

The actions are being taken in response to the long-awaited publication of the public inquiry’s conclusions by retired High Court judge Sir Brian Langstaff, which were initiated in 2018. Since the inquiry’s inception, an estimated 710 more victims have passed away.

The National Health Service (NHS) and the Department of Health are likely to come under fire for allowing the use of imported blood products years after the initial alerts that they may be tainted with diseases including hepatitis C and HIV.

They will also be savaged for their evasive response to campaigners seeking the truth, in what victims believe to have been a concerted cover-up lasting decades.

In the 1970s and 1980s, the NHS supplied tainted blood products to around 30,000 patients in the UK, who subsequently contracted hepatitis C and HIV. The contaminated goods were inexpensively imported from the United States, where blood was procured from individuals who were paid to donate it, including drug addicts, prisoners, and the homeless.

Individuals receiving treatment for blood diseases like haemophilia and those receiving blood transfusions made up the majority of those affected.

Kate Burt, chief executive of the Haemophilia Society, said: ‘The contaminated blood scandal has been a stain on our nation for too long.

‘For the sake of the thousands of lives lost to this disaster, the Government must accept all the Infected Blood Inquiry’s recommendations and begin work immediately to rebuild trust in our public services. Only a commitment to deliver radical reform and to treat those it serves with compassion and respect will begin to end this shameful episode in our country’s history.’

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt yesterday described the episode as ‘the worst scandal of my lifetime’ and said the families ‘have got every right to be incredibly angry that generations of politicians, including me when I was health secretary, have not acted fast enough to address the scandal’.

The compensation plan has been approved by Mr Hunt, but the exact cost won’t be known until a new committee has created a payment structure.

Labour health spokesman Wes Streeting said he expected Sir Brian to criticise ‘successive governments’ over the issue.

Mr Streeting said an incoming Labour administration would honour any compensation deal agreed by the Government, adding: ‘Everyone has got their responsibility to bear in this appalling scandal and we have got a shared responsibility to put it right.’

Even if Rishi Sunak was not Prime Minister at the time, he is today, hence he should apologise for the wrongdoings of his predecessors! And he actively shares the same Tory ideology of treating ordinary people like dirt but it will be a farse as is every other word spoken by the Tories.

However, this isn’t the worst treatment disaster in NHS history. The damage caused by the COVID-19 jabs will massively eclipse this, so let’s see how this plays out over the next decade.

The taxpayer won’t object, in my opinion, to the victim’s recompense. But why should the taxpayer foot the bill for something they had nothing to do with? My sympathies are with the victims who have died without receiving justice, but no amount of money will make things right, and our government must bow down and acknowledge its wrongdoings.

Wig No More

English courts could drop the requirement for barristers wearing wigs amid accusations they are ‘culturally insensitive’, it has been reported.

After several barristers protested that the obligation to wear wigs discriminated against people with Afro-Caribbean hair, the judiciary is reportedly in negotiations to amend court dress standards.

According to reports, judges are considering recommendations put forth by the Bar Council, which represents solicitors in England and Wales. The Telegraph said that any adjustments will be made as soon as possible in the autumn.

This happened as a result of objections made by several black solicitors who demanded that the requirement to wear wigs be removed.

Since 2007, wigs, also referred to as perukes, have not been required in civil, family, or Supreme Court proceedings. However, they continue to be necessary for criminal cases.

Barristers who like to wear a turban or a hijab to court may seek special permission if they would like to avoid wearing a wig.

Styled after 17th-century fashion, they are made of horsehair.

Over the last two years, a black barrister has been at the centre of a heated controversy regarding the wearing of wigs in court, with orders to wear one or risk disciplinary punishment.

A Bar Council spokesman told the Telegraph: ‘Following questions from barristers about wigs and hair discrimination, the Bar Council set up a working group to consider court dress in the context of all protected characteristics.

‘The findings of the working group are currently being discussed with the judiciary as part of our regular dialogue on equality and diversity matters.’

Leslie Thomas KC called for the ‘ridiculous costume’ to be brought to an end.

He said: ‘The wigs certainly should go. There isn’t any place in modern society for barristers to be wearing 17th-century fashion.’

A spokesman for the judiciary said: ‘Senior judges are in active discussions with the Bar Council about the findings of their working group on court dress.

‘We welcome these discussions as part of our continuing joint work on diversity and inclusion in the legal profession.’

How many years into his study of the profession did it dawn on him that he would have to wear a wig as part of the uniform? When the professional dress code is relaxed, so does the profession.

A formal dress code? I don’t think that wigs are necessary and never have been, but it’s an old law that needs to be updated so long as the profession doesn’t fall. However, other countries seem to get away with it perfectly fine without having them, and it doesn’t seem to have affected people receiving justice, and a fashion show is not and never will be essential for the dispensing of justice.

However, we would be removing something because of a particular demographic that finds the wig offensive or dislikes it. People lose hair, let’s face it, but they don’t want others to chop off theirs because they find it offensive.

Because barristers’ wig wear is so famous, maybe if they don’t like it, they should practise somewhere else. If wig producers stopped making wigs to appease certain groups, they would go out of business.

A barrister’s wig lends them a sense of authority, thus they should be treated seriously rather than as props for a fashion show.

I’ve seen female barristers with all manner of hairstyles and they seem to manage perfectly well with their wigs. These groups should follow our culture or go elsewhere.

However, wigs can be hot, uncomfortable, and quite unfashionable. They might have been fashionable hundreds of years ago, and maybe they need updating, but they’re still iconic, and if we are going to oust them from the courtroom, they should go because of that reason and not because it offends others.

AI Will Be Very Bad For Society, Warns Former Google Vice President 

According to a tech pioneer who helped AI become popular, a universal basic income should be provided to all people to offset the disruptive effects of this contentious technology on employment.

Former Google vice president Geoffrey Hinton said AI and robots would be ‘very bad for society’ because the millions of workers left jobless by the technology will not enjoy the wealth resulting from the boom in productivity.

Speaking to the BBC’s Newsnight, the academic said: ‘I certainly believe in a universal basic income.

‘But I don’t think that’s enough because a lot of people get their self-respect from the jobs they do.’

He continued: ‘If you pay everybody a universal basic income, that solves the problem of them starving and not being able to pay the rent but that doesn’t solve the self-respect problem.’

The expert, who said he had raised the idea of universal basic income at Downing Street, warned that many blue-collar and ‘mid-level intellectual jobs’ will disappear because of AI, but predicted that plumbing could be safe from the march of the robots.

‘My best bet about a job that is safe is plumbing because these things [AI] aren’t yet very good at physical manipulation,’ he said. ‘That will probably be the last thing they are very good at.’

His caution follows the IMF’s forecast that artificial intelligence will impact 40% of jobs globally. According to the Institute for Public Policy Research, the deployment of AI in the workplace might result in the loss of eight million jobs in the United Kingdom.

Hinton, who quit Google in 2023 to sound the alarm about AI, said he was pleased that the world was now taking its ‘existential threat’ to humanity seriously, as well as its impact on society.

‘I am very worried about AI taking over lots of mundane jobs,’ he said. ‘That should be a good thing. It’s going to lead to a big increase in productivity, which leads to a big increase in wealth, and if that wealth was equally distributed, that would be great, but it’s not going to be.

‘In the systems we live in, that wealth is going to go to the rich and not to the people whose jobs get lost, and that’s going to be very bad for society, I believe.

‘It’s going to increase the gap between rich and poor, which increases the chances of Right-wing populists getting elected,’ he warned.

Just a few days ago, Sainsbury’s and Microsoft agreed to deploy AI capabilities from the tech giant to enhance the shopping experience for consumers and free up staff members’ time so they can concentrate on important duties.

Permanent job loss and high immigration rates are two incompatible things, particularly if the individuals who are already here cannot be sent back.

We thus know that AI will eliminate hundreds of millions of jobs worldwide, and therefore we need to decide as a society to prioritise human life over AI, but corporate greed won’t allow that to happen, and civilisation will not survive when you have hundreds of millions of people with no purpose. Advanced technology (AI) will not benefit society, it will destroy it!

AI is already devastating the creative industry, and the news industry will be quickly devastated as well because no one will know what is true and what is AI-generated. Menial jobs may hang around for a little while but AI will eventually create robots that will be just as good as any craftsman. I bet you don’t think ‘Terminator’ was just fiction now!

It’s Not A Great Day For London’s Buses

London’s bus network was thrown into chaos as three buses were taken out of action by fire and crashes.

Incredibly, one bus in Twickenham burst into flames before burning completely, and in Southall, the E5 to Perivale crashed into a bus stop on South Road, causing extensive damage.

On the opposite side of London, on the 5 route between Canning Town and Romford, a new-style Routemaster struck the side of a home on East Ham’s Claughton Road. The three incidents all took place on Saturday.

Transport for London (TfL) had a hectic day. This was the fourth significant bus fire to affect its fleet this year, following similar occurrences in Wimbledon on January 11, North Woolwich on January 12, and Putney on January 25.

The East Ham incident went viral on TikTok and X, formerly Twitter, with a copy of the video on the Elon Musk-owned site picking up 60,000 views in a matter of hours.

The video showed the crash from multiple angles – as the bright red people mover was seen crashed into the house, mounted on the pavement.

It seems to have hit and knocked off a section of the roof of a building across the street. An alternative viewpoint indicated that it was a number 5 bus, which passes through the region along the adjacent Barking Road, a major thoroughfare.

Why the bus was on the residential street is a mystery. There does not appear to have been any scheduled detours on the route, according to London’s roadworks registry.

Multiple angles of the Southall crash were shared on social media. The shunt is believed to have happened sometime between 5 pm and 6 pm and decimated the bus stop, which was later seen wrapped up in tape.

The vehicle was dealt heavy damage in the collision, smashing the left side of the front windscreen and splitting open its front bumper.

There were pieces of safety glass strewn all over the pavement. The LED screen that showed the arrivals of upcoming flights stayed operational despite the disaster.

It had been changed to read: ‘Bus stop closed. Please use the next stop or the previous stop to catch your bus.’

The TfL website has been updated to say the bus stop is ‘reporting access issues’. Videos shared on Snapchat suggest the bus was removed from the scene sometime after nightfall. 

A few miles away, at approximately 1 pm, Richmond Road in Twickenham, southwest London, was engulfed in massive flames and billowing smoke.

The London Fire Brigade said that although the fire damaged a single-decker bus, the driver and passengers managed to escape before rescue personnel could reach.

The road remains closed, with people advised to avoid the area for the rest of the day. 

The issue is that foreign nationals operate an excessive number of buses, but let’s face it—if they can manoeuvre a dinghy, they can certainly operate a bus.

All fares please “Dinghy, Dinghy!”

A ban on the majority of these new drivers is necessary, as they have been engaged in several accidents and near misses, and it seems that a lot of these drivers are now quite reckless and it must be said that they seem to treat the public roads like a race track.

Bus drivers are dangerous, especially around London. They speed along or just take up two lanes, and now this is Khanage in Khantown, and now Whacky Races.

The majority of bus drivers in London are foreign nationals who most likely passed their driving exam while riding a donkey. They also don’t truly understand the English language.

In Hot Water!

Britain’s ‘kindest’ plumber has had his citizen award rescinded after the trader faked stories about helping vulnerable people and pocketed £10,000 in donations.

The award was granted to James Anderson, 56, in 2023 in recognition of his efforts to provide free plumbing services and boilers to individuals in need.

Anderson is a resident of Burnley, Lancashire. He is the owner of Depher, which stands for Disabled and Elderly, Plumbing and Heating Emergency Response. Anderson also frequently updates his social media accounts with free boiler repair and replacement services.

However, a BBC investigation found that to generate thousands of pounds in contributions, the firm staged stories about assisting individuals.

Because of the newly discovered facts about the plumber, the British Citizen Awards have revoked their prize, citing a conflict with their principles.

Social media posts about Anderson’s charitable endeavours gained widespread attention during the UK’s high cost of living problem.

Anderson’s business gained recognition for providing free plumbing services and installing boilers for the elderly.

However, a BBC investigation claimed that he was selling false information and taking advantage of the weak while receiving £2 million in donations from the general people and £75,000 from celebrities like Hugh Grant and Lily Allen.

Anderson faced accusations of fabricating tales of saving an eighty-four-year-old woman from suicide and of disclosing his clients’ personal information without their consent.

A spokesperson for the British Citizen Awards told the BBC: ‘We pride ourselves in recognising individuals across the UK who work tirelessly and selflessly to make a positive impact on their communities and charities.’

They went on to say that the plumber’s behaviour didn’t align with their principles and that they had revoked his award.

When recently challenged by the BBC and GB News about the posts he’s allegedly faked, he didn’t explain but denied using the raised money for his own benefit.

However, he told GB News: ‘I’m only human, I’m doing the best I can.’

Speaking on the channel, he said: ‘I think in hindsight I’ve done too much too quick on my own, instead of getting in other people to help me and support me. Saying that it’s no excuse. But today has been very horrendous for me.’ 

The Fundraising Regulator launched an inquiry into the plumber’s business in response to the BBC’s disclosures to determine if Depher violated any provisions of the code of fundraising practice.

Elements of the code include being legal, transparent, and respectful.

This man has now been called out. His claims didn’t add up, but people being the way they are now believe the social media hype and ignore the red flags, including celebrities. People are suckers for a sob story, and people seem to live in a fantasy world, and this has been going on for a very long time.

He’s been plumbing the depths of the abyss, to effectively steal an image of being the good samaritan, so the opposite of Robin Hood.

Sadly, there are decent tradespeople out there who are unfairly characterised by individuals such as this plonker.

He’s a nasty guy, and I don’t know how people can act this way. It’s known as temptation and human nature, I guess. He’s certainly plumbed the depths of dishonesty, and criminal investigations should be initiated against him, especially when he’s received all that money.

Ultimately, if you’re a kind person and you help others, you shouldn’t feel the need to boast about it or even get paid for it. You should never ask for anything in return; you help others because you want to.

Benefits Cheat Caught Running 5K On Secret Camera

A benefits cheat who lied about being disabled was caught on camera going for 5k runs in her neighbourhood.

Annette Bond, 49, claimed she could hardly walk due to her multiple sclerosis and took almost £70,000 in benefits before fraud investigators set up secret surveillance in her area, which captured her ability to run 5km over mixed terrain more than once a week. Over the span of a decade, Bond had claimed “enhanced” benefit payments due to a series of conditions she claimed made it almost impossible for her to stand up, or even get out of bed, the Daily Record reports.

The jury at Perth Sheriff Court heard how she conned taxpayers out of £67,062.50 through false claims that her mobility was severely impaired by multiple sclerosis. The jury later found her guilty after being shown video footage of Bond leaving her home in high-visibility running gear, before running for almost 30 minutes around her neighbourhood.

Bond has now been ordered to pay back the £67,062.50 under the proceeds of crime legislation. Sheriff William Wood told her: “The rate of benefits awarded to you was dependent upon honest disclosure of your abilities.”

He continued: “On the basis of your application, you were awarded the highest rate of the care component and the higher rate of the mobility component of DLA. These are normally for those who… cannot or are virtually unable to walk unaided. Former work colleagues clearly indicated you did not require either the level of care or impaired mobility required for the benefits you claimed.”

“You rarely used a stick; you were able to get around the workplace unaided; you could negotiate stairs; and you were able to dance at a Christmas function. But by far the most graphic evidence in the trial that your condition had improved was the surveillance footage obtained by DWP investigators from 2017, recording your ability to run five kilometres over mixed terrain more than once a week.”

“I have noted you continue to maintain your innocence,” Sheriff Wood said. “You must have known you did not meet the criteria for the benefits of which you were in receipt. Your conduct can only be characterised as a prolonged and egregious course of dishonesty, for which there is no excuse.”

“You have obtained, through fraud, a significant sum of money to which you had no entitlement and you have deprived the taxpayer of funds that might have been usefully spent elsewhere. You have defrauded the state of a large sum of money over a protracted period. I am satisfied only a custodial sentence is appropriate.”

Fraud investigators disclosed that since they had accumulated so much damaging information against Bond, the crew had withdrawn from the surveillance mission early. In 2017, Scott Hodge, a 54-year-old fraud investigator for the Department of Work and Pensions, testified in court that the team parked at her residence and videotaped her running the same route three times in ten days.

When a few people are exposed for intentionally manipulating the system, many people may be deterred from engaging in similar behaviour. Therefore, anyone found doing so should have their rights to benefits revoked.

All fraud is wrong, but there are far more people dodging paying their proper taxation in this country and I don’t see HMRC going after them as eagerly. DWP seems to hire far more staff for fraud.

She was a good catch, but there are also genuinely sick and disabled people out there who end up getting tarred with the same brush. 

Rylan Clark And Rob Rinder Share Their ‘Perfect Relationship’

Rob Rinder told MailOnline that his connection with Ryan Clark had evolved into something more than simply a friendship, as speculations circulated over whether or not they had fallen in love.

The barrister and broadcaster, 45, and his TV partner, 35, had a wonderful time celebrating together at the BAFTAS, as fans hailed them as the ‘perfect couple’.

Rob smiled lovingly up at his 6ft 4in partner on the red carpet at London’s Royal Festival Hall, and he said that they had never been closer.

‘It’s always a joy to be alongside him’, he told MailOnline today.

Last night Rob shared a picture of them in Italy with the Lord Byron quote: ‘Friendship may, and often does, grow into love’ – sparking huge excitement amongst fans, wishing happiness and a fresh start for him and Rylan, perhaps even together.

Rob admitted he has developed a deep bond with Rylan, describing him as the ‘real deal’, but insisted they are not in a romantic relationship.

‘We aren’t a couple. It is what Rylan said; we are like a very old married couple; we row, laugh together, and don’t have sex’, he said.

Their show Grand Tour premiered on BBC 2 last night to great acclaim. The friends spoke movingly about their divorces and looking forward to rebuilding their lives in a show billed as a bittersweet ‘heartbreak holiday’.

Rob broke down as Rylan admitted he tried to ‘end it all’ and he ‘just sunk’ after his marriage to Dan Neal ended in 2021 after six years. Mr Rinder then spoke tearfully about the pain of unrequited love before sharing a toast to ‘love’.

Viewers said there was ‘chemistry’ between them and suggested that they would make the ‘perfect couple’. 

The barrister claimed that Rylan has grown to be one of his closest friends and that he was awarded an MBE in 2021 for his contributions to Holocaust education.

‘He’s the real deal, which is rare. He isn’t just the friend you call in a crisis—that’s the easy bit—he’s the mate who will celebrate with gusto with you when great things happen—that’s the true barometer of friendship’.

The friends were in Italy for the first episode of their travel show.

As they took in Venice’s attractions, Rob attempted to impart his passion for art to Rylan.

They then talked about their divorces in a poignant scenario that included a view of one of the many canals in the city.

I don’t think they’re any more than really good friends and that’s so lovely to see because true friendships are rare and need to be cherished.

Both of them are excellent guys who appear to get along nicely. They have both come from modest backgrounds and have put forth a great deal of effort to succeed. If it works, then it works, and they are both very likeable. I would happily have them both over for dinner, as I believe that they would be great company and the laughter would be in abundance.

It’s possible to love someone and not fall in love, so maybe their love is only a friendship that will eventually blossom into love. Regardless of their relationship, it’s obvious that they enjoy each other’s company and are quite close.

Finding a friend who shares common life problems is great, but the media is going to pull their friendship apart, so now it’s time to leave them alone. This is old news now; let’s move on!

Devon’s Dirty Water Crisis Could Last 10 Days

Devon’s water crisis could last for 10 days after hundreds have fallen ill with vomiting and diarrhoea amid a parasite outbreak in contaminated taps. 

Following the discovery of a cryptosporidium infection that has sickened hundreds of people, a school has been forced to close and people are purchasing water in stores out of terror.

Following hundreds of cases of diarrhoea, vomiting, and stomach aches, South West Water (SWW) advised residents yesterday to boil their tap water.

About 40,000 people get their water supply from the Hillhead Reservoir, which is being looked at as a possible source of the epidemic, according to the water company.

Cryptosporidium is a parasitic infection that causes severe gastrointestinal problems, and it is thought to be connected to the mysterious disease.

Bottled water stations were put up to supply locals with clean, safe water to take home. Locals in Brixham, Boohay, Kingswear, Roseland, and north-east Paignton in Devon were advised to boil water as a precaution, especially when drinking it or using it to cook with and brush teeth.

Eden Park Primary School in Brixham told parents last night they would not be opening after they claimed South West Water did not supply them with bottled water.

The water board initially claimed its treatment works were not to blame but has since backtracked – prompting fury from local Tory MP Anthony Mangnall, who said its initial failure to act had been ‘enormously frustrating’.

Locals who believe they have been struck down by the parasite, which can be eradicated by boiling water, have told of severe stomach cramps, dehydration, high fevers and ‘explosive diarrhoea’ that have crippled them and their families.

The intestines and excrement of both diseased people and animals contain Cryptosporidium. The parasite can be consumed by contaminated food, water, or other sources. It can also be acquired by swimming in or drinking polluted water.

It can lead to the disease cryptosporidiosis, which is believed to be affecting many people in Brixham, and causes fever, a loss of appetite, diarrhoea and vomiting. The NHS says most people recover within a month, if not less.

The parasite-caused illness has been linked to 22 confirmed cases in Brixham, and another 70 are being looked at.

Eden Park Primary School in Brixham announced that it would not be opening to pupils following the outbreak. 

The statement read: ‘Eden Park Primary School were only informed this afternoon that the school was in an area where the tap water should be boiled.

‘The school have taken swift action to put safety plans in place and contact the appropriate authorities about providing safe drinking water.

‘At the time of writing this update (7.30pm), and despite repeated calls to South West Water about the urgency of the situation, the school has not received any bottled water or assurances of when water will be delivered. To enable parents and carers to make childcare plans for the morning, leaders have made the difficult decision to close the school tomorrow, Thursday 16th May.

‘All Year 6 children should attend the school as usual to complete their final SATs paper in the morning. They should bring their own full water bottle and be collected at 11:15am. The school will also provide bottled water for children and staff in school tomorrow. No other children should attend the school.

‘A further update will be provided tomorrow afternoon, regarding the opening the school on Friday 17th May. Thank you for understanding with this rapidly changing situation.’

Lewis, Izzy, and Lisa Kelly, three locals, have been dealing with the agonising effects of cryptosporidium for almost two weeks.

We give millions in overseas aid to provide clean water for people and yet allow companies not fit for the task to provide ours, and at such an exorbitant cost. Now households need to spend more on boiling water and buying bottled water, which should be handed out free. This whole infrastructure needs to come under government control, and the people pouring untreated sewage into our waterways and seas need to be locked up.

We also pay millions for health care, but we can never get a doctors appointment, or have to wait on waiting lists for years for operations. We pay millions on defending Ukrainian borders and forcing out invaders, but ours are open and undefended and our invaders are housed in hotels and given health care. The British people don’t have any rights, we only dream of them!

‘Megxit Was A Cover-Up,’ Claims Engineer As He Launches Legal Bid To ‘Prove’ He’s Charles And Camilla’s Secret Love Child

A British-born engineer specialising in electronics and telecommunications, who immigrated to Australia after being adopted feels he is the love child of Prince Charles and Camilla. He is planning to apply for a court order to compel the heir apparent and his spouse to undergo a DNA test.

Simon Dorante-Day, 53, has admitted court clerks laughed when he first filed his papers and despite his breathtaking legal claim being thrown out three times already, he is refusing to give up ‘his 40-year search’ for the truth about his birth parents.

He believes that his parentage will have been discussed by the Queen, Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry at this month’s Sandringham summit, where the terms of Harry and Meghan’s ‘Megxit’ deal were thrashed out. And last year, he caused upset having claimed Princess Diana’s death in Paris in August 1997 came after ‘she was going to go public with it’. 

Simon claims his adoptive grandparents, Winifred and Ernest, worked for the Queen and Prince Philip as a cook and a gardener respectively and told him ‘many times’ that he was ‘Charles and Camilla’s child’.

He said previously: ‘I know it sounds unbelievable, but anything I say is checkable… I’m simply a man looking for my biological parents, and every road has led me back to Camilla and Charles’. 

Mr. Dorante was adopted by Karen and David Day, the children of Winifred and Ernest, when he was eighteen months old. He was born in Gosport, Hampshire, in April 1966.

If his bizarre allegations are true, he would have had to have been conceived in 1965, when Charles was 17 and Camilla, was 18, and he claims his Windsor-like cheekbones and teeth, and ‘Camilla-style hair’, are compelling evidence his claims are true.

He even calls himself ‘Prince Simon’ on social media and his Facebook page is packed with posts where he matches his face from birth to today with Charles, Camilla and their children, with particular focus on Prince William and Tom Parker-Bowles.

The British national denies claims his story is ‘bonkers’ and ‘bogus’, including critics who point out that his eyes are brown but Charles and Camilla both have blue eyes.

However, two blue-eyed parents can have a brown-eyed child. Blue eye colour is recessive while brown eye colour is dominant, so, if the gene for brown eye colour is present in the parents’ DNA, then their child can have brown eyes.

One commentator who took him to task said: ‘Two people who have blue eyes cannot produce a brown-eyed person. How is that explained in your case, Simon?’

The 53-year-old responded: ‘That’s been explained publicly, Sue; it’s already out there—that’s why they had to tamper with my eyes—exactly the point’.

He also says he has compelling evidence proving his claim but said online: ‘As things are all part of the court case at the moment, I can’t discuss much further.’ 

Now residing in Queensland, Simon Mr Dorante-Day has expressed on many occasions his conviction that he was placed for adoption by 18-year-old Camilla Shand, a relationship that seems to have been arranged through his adoptive grandparents’ employment with the royal family.

Whether or not this is plausible. He ought to have the opportunity to ascertain whether Charles and Camilla are, in fact, his biological parents. After all, if it’s not true, then the DNA tests will show that they’re not and that will be the end of that!

I’m not sure what everyone is frightened about; even if it turns out that he is the son of Charles and Camilla, he would never be the legitimate successor to the throne because he was born out of wedlock. claiming that he would undoubtedly do better than the dull group we now have, and putting all the legalities aside. How insanely funny would it be if he did turn out to be their son?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started