‘We’re Putting Our Baby Up For Adoption; She’s Not A Good Fit For The Family’

A couple has sparked outrage after deciding to put their three-month-old baby up for adoption because she ‘doesn’t fit in well’ with their family. The dad took to Reddit to share the shocking story, explaining that his wife, Catherine, 33, returned to work just two weeks after giving birth, and their daughter, Elizabeth, is primarily cared for by her grandmother.

He said, “I go to work later than her [my wife], so I take morning duty, but she gets home earlier than I do, so she takes evening duty. During the day, Elizabeth stays with my mother-in-law.” However, he noticed that Catherine was neglecting their newborn’s emotional needs. “Catherine really doesn’t have anything to do with her. Even if she is crying, unless it’s for a real reason (like being hungry or wet), Catherine doesn’t do anything to soothe her,” the 35-year-old added.

“I know that babies sometimes cry for no reason and that picking Elizabeth up every time she cries could reinforce the crying, shouldn’t she at least pick her up and soothe her a bit? Plus, even when she’s not crying, Catherine doesn’t interact with her.” Finding it hard to connect with their baby girl and longing for their old life back, the couple decided to put their three-month-old up for adoption. Before taking this step, the dad sought advice from Reddit users about the adoption process.

He asked, “I will be consulting a lawyer this week, but prefer to go in with some idea of what to expect. My wife and I wish to place our three-month-old daughter up for adoption. Are there any laws that could impact this process? Could members of our family file against our decision to adopt out? How long can we expect the entire process to take?”

Reddit users were taken aback and questioned how they came to this decision. The dad confessed that their daughter is “not a good fit for the family,” and having a baby has made “taking holidays awkward for his wife.”

He shared: “My wife broke the news to my mother-in-law of our decision to adopt. She reacted poorly, which is to be expected, and with a great deal of yelling. This did not endear her to my wife, who finds yelling annoying, but attempts to placate the yelling resulted in more yelling.”

He continued: “In short, my mother-in-law first blamed her deceased ex-husband for my wife ‘turning out like this’ and then myself for our decision. I was called a number of names and learned that my mother-in-law had disapproved of me from the start of the relationship and otherwise trashed.”

“It went on to the point that Catherine eventually threatened to ensure my mother-in-law never saw our daughter again if she would not be reasonable. That quieted my mother-in-law enough for my wife to lay out how the upcoming months would go.”

The couple then told the mother-in-law she could adopt Elizabeth if she wanted; otherwise, she would be placed with another family. “Our daughter was going up for adoption; this was non-negotiable. My mother-in-law, having assisted in her care, could take custody if she so wished.”

“My sister-in-law would be a permissible alternate. Otherwise, we would pursue outside arrangements. As many predicted, my mother-in-law opted to assume custody herself, and we started that process after Thanksgiving.”

After hearing this, the mother-in-law took the three-month-old baby, left the house, and stayed in a hotel. “Shortly thereafter, my sister-in-law called, in the end, she threatened to call the police if we attend [family gatherings],” he said.

“Communication from my mother-in-law and sister-in-law has been sparse since my mother-in-law left. From what we know, she and Elizabeth are staying with my sister-in-law for the time being. Moving forward, we are cooperating as much as possible to ensure the transition of legal custody over Elizabeth goes smoothly.”

“My mother-in-law thus far refused any and all offers of financial aid, but we are prepared to pay child support if/when the time arrives.” Some people praised him for ‘saving his daughter from a lifetime of misery’, while others criticised him for ‘not even trying to be a parent’ before giving up.

One person commented, “I don’t understand why everyone is so mad. They’re s****y parents and realise that. The kid is probably better off being put up for adoption.” Another said, “Therapy has not been tried by either parent. Therapy needs to be tried.”

A third asked, “Now this is an odd situation. Would it be better for a pair of parents who are willing to send off their three-month-old child for whatever sociopathic reason to continue to raise said child, or should they go through with the adoption, preventing the child from being raised by a bunch of weirdos?”

Some might say that this couple is very self-centred, and perhaps they should have kept it in their pants if they didn’t want their lives to be inconvenienced.

Maybe the mother needs help since she may be suffering from postpartum depression.

It brings me great joy to know that there is someone who genuinely cares for this unfortunate girl and is prepared to give her the best possible life. Sadly, her heart will be destroyed when she grows up and discovers that her parents didn’t love her enough to raise her themselves. Hopefully, her grandma will love her enough to help her through this.

Southampton Police Solve The Mystery Of The Human Placenta Found By A Schoolboy

Police have figured out why a youngster in Southampton discovered a human placenta in a park.

In June of last year, a fifteen-year-old student discovered the placenta in Shirley, Southampton’s Holly Brook Park. This led to an eight-month, expensive hunt for the mother.

Hampshire Police now say ‘certain ethnic practices’ led to the baby’s placenta being left in the park after analysis by a genetic scientist revealed the DNA profile of the mother of the baby was most likely of sub-Saharan heritage, probably West African.

According to officers, placenta burial is associated with customs from West African civilizations.

They also revealed that the investigation took eight months because the family was unaware of the search, despite the intense publicity it generated.

A £5,000 reward was put out in October because investigators thought there could have been a crime involved.

Police say their priority throughout the inquiry was always the welfare of the mother and her baby, but they also needed to be certain that no criminal act had taken place.

A large team of officers, led by Detective Chief Inspector Elizabeth Pirie, pursued endless lines of inquiry.

Armed with DNA analysis of the family’s ethnicity, they reached out to the relevant communities in the city.

Working with the NHS, they also checked records relating to births and deaths over a five- to ten-day period and tried to establish which mothers had taken their placenta home.

Cross-referencing data and employing a process of elimination to focus the search took a significant amount of time.

They eventually narrowed in on a certain family and utilised DNA testing to be sure they had located the correct individuals.

Southampton Chief Inspector Marcus Kennedy said: ‘They weren’t aware of the media’s involvement and didn’t see what we had put out.

‘But once they were made aware, they were really happy to engage with us and very pleased for the police support. They are lovely people—a great family.’

Asked why the placenta was buried, he said the reason appeared to be cultural.

‘During the investigation, our priority was always the welfare of the mother and her child. I know how traumatic childbirth can be and how the mother always needs medical support afterwards.’

Chief Inspector Kennedy said he was ‘comfortable’ with the time taken to solve the mystery and the number of officers involved in the inquiry.

It goes without saying that burying human waste in a public park is inappropriate when it comes to placenta disposal.

The cost of investigating the matter would have been considerable, but understandable. However, this should never have happened. You might be able to bury your placenta anywhere you like in the Sahara, but not in our public parks.

The family wouldn’t have considered the placenta human waste, but would have considered it a spiritual part of their child and ritually buried it in what they considered an auspicious place to ensure the good fortune and health of their precious child. For them, digging up the placenta would have been akin to someone digging up the grave of their child and abusing the body.

I understand that it’s their practice, but now they live in our country, and this isn’t our practice. I’m sure they’re a very nice family, though, but are they going to reimburse the taxpayer for money wasted on the investigation?

It’s not actually that disgusting burying a placenta. What do you think people did before birth in hospitals? However, we do have hospitals now – perhaps they should have fried it with some onions and had it for dinner as part of the ritual. Hannibal Lecter, eat your heart out—yummy!

Race Row As Black Father Claims He Was ‘Refused Paint For His Son By Hobbycraft Staff Because They Assumed He Would Use It To GRAFFITI’

A black father alleges that when purchasing paint for his son at an arts and crafts business, he was “racially profiled” and “refused service” because the employees thought he would commit an “incidence of graffiti.” 

But Hobbycraft says it was because he could not provide ID for an age-related product.

Louis Gray, from Cardiff, alleges he was refused service at his local Hobbycraft store on Saturday when trying to buy spray paint with his four-year-old son so that he could have a bike helmet in ‘a new colour to be like his idol’. 

Mr Gray said, ‘I was buying spray paint to ironically spray my 4-year-old’s bike helmet a new colour to be like his idol. You need to be 16 to buy spray paint in the UK! Cool I accept that, but that’s in place to stop ‘incidences of graffiti’, in my opinion very different to gambling and alcohol.’

In an email to Mr Gray, Hobbycraft apologised for his ‘recent experience’ and said the reason why he was refused service was because he could not provide ID for an age-restricted product.

They said they were continuing to investigate the incident and said they had a ‘zero tolerance approach’ to racism. 

According to government legislation, it is an offence to sell aerosol spray paints to persons under the age of 16, with the objective to ‘reduce the incidence of criminal damage’ caused by ‘acts of graffiti’.

Mr Gray claims he was ‘surrounded’ by three members of staff—one who was allegedly ‘wearing a bodycam to record the transaction’ and one who allegedly ‘waved his hands in the air’ to signal more staff.

Mr Gray believes he was ‘racially profiled’ by staff at the store and ‘refused service’ based on the colour of his skin and because he was wearing a ‘Nike tracksuit and Yeezys’.

He said, ‘It was the first time I have experienced racial profiling in front of my child. It’s something I always thought I could protect him from, however, today, it was stolen from me. I was judged in front of him, I had to stay strong and keep my head up in the face of adversity.’

In an email to Mr Gray, Hobbycraft said, ‘We would once again like to apologise for your recent experience in our store. We have a zero-tolerance approach to racism here at Hobbycraft, and this is not how we want any of our customers to feel. As an employer, we are dedicated to creating an inclusive environment for our colleagues and customers and therefore take your feedback very seriously.

‘We are continuing to investigate this with our Newport store team. Your situation involved the purchase of an age-restricted product which requires age verification, meaning all colleagues are trained to ask for ID should they believe the customer is under the age of 25. As you were unable to share ID with our colleagues, they were unfortunately unable to authorise the sale.

Regarding the race card, I’m not sure, but it’s obvious that this man is older than sixteen or twenty-one. Since the man was clearly too old to be ID’d for the item he was attempting to buy, Hobbycraft didn’t need to ID him.

My son was ID’d for Rizla papers once. He never got served because he never had ID on him. My son was definitely over the age of 21 at the time, and earlier he had gone through the main checkout to buy alcohol, which he wasn’t ID’d for. I complained to the company, which I will not mention, and all they said was that they would give their staff additional training. Unfortunately, some of the staff behind the tills run on having a power kick and enjoy it.

I understand that some people don’t always look their age, and the cashier might not be sure, but this guy clearly looked over 21 and therefore should not have been ID’d.

Regarding the race card, I’m not sure. He could have believed it to be the cause, and it might have been, but we won’t know for sure until the CCTV evidence is shown, which is unlikely to happen anytime soon. The store must retrain its employees on its policies.

A Serial Killer’s Daughter Reveals The Awful Secret She Carries Around With Her

The vicious serial murderer Fred and Rose West’s daughter has opened up about the terrible secret she lives with every day and the terrifying letter her horrible mother sent to her while she was incarcerated. 

Mae West, 52, was raised in the murderous couple’s house and endured horrendous physical and sexual torture at the hands of her parents.

In their ‘home of horrors’ on 25 Cromwell Street, the couple had buried decaying carcasses in the basement, and she was made to sleep on them. 

Speaking on the 30th anniversary of her parent’s incarceration, Mae also disclosed that she has never discussed her family’s notorious misdeeds with her son.

She told The Sun that her younger son ‘knows nothing’ about her past and has ‘not a clue’. 

Though her priority is to live a ‘normal, everyday life’, she admitted that it was getting harder to keep the truth from him.

She told the publication, ‘He’s at an age now where he’s starting to ask questions. All I’ve told him is my dad’s dead and I don’t speak to my mum.

‘As far as I’m concerned, he never will. Not from me, anyway.’

On February 25, 1994, authorities started excavating the house, which ultimately put a stop to Fred and Rose’s murderous rampage. 

On New Year’s Day in 1995, Fred West committed suicide at HMP Birmingham, one year later. Rose received a total life sentence for 10 of the killings. 

In addition, Mae’s mother sent her a letter cutting off all communication while she was serving her term.

She explained: ‘Me and my mother stopped speaking 16 years ago. We fell out. It was her choice.

‘She wrote me a letter basically telling me, ‘It’s best if I leave you to it.’ In other words, she no longer wanted to see me or communicate with me.

‘It made me question a lot of things at the time, such as whether I was with her or not with her. It’s weird that someone is your parent and alive but you no longer see them.’

Despite having spent the last 30 years creating a new life for herself, Mae admitted that she still thinks about her slain sister on a regular basis. 

She said in her recent interview, ‘I do get terribly sad when I think about Heather, how old she’d be now, what kind of life she’d have had. I love her so much.

She has done so well to survive this and lead a good life, and hopefully, we can rely on the press not to try to expose her and help her children to have a peaceful and happy life, but then why have your life plastered all over the newspaper, saying that she hopes her son doesn’t find out? That simply doesn’t make any sense.

These things, however, are usually forced by the press, and they were going to publish on the 30th anniversary and probably ask her for some words – might as well get paid for it because they’d publish anyway, which puts her in an impossible situation.

The poor woman has endured enough in this life; she doesn’t need further criticism.

It’s true that we have no say in who raises us, especially if our parents are bad. She’s had to deal with practically unfathomable things; therefore, it must have been incredibly difficult for her to try living a regular life.

I don’t understand why she wasn’t offered a new name and a chance to move abroad so that she could start again. She was perfectly entitled to it.

A £1 Billion ‘Toaster Tax’ Faces Britons Under Government ‘Net Zero’ Plans

MPs and industry chiefs have warned new government ‘Net Zero’ proposals could see Britons hit by a £1billion ‘toaster tax’.

Plans to amend regulations to promote the reuse and recycling of used electrical equipment are presently being consulted on by the Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. 

One of the proposed changes to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations (WEEE) is the ‘take back’ of old electrical devices by bigger retailers. 

This may even apply if the products were purchased elsewhere and a new purchase from the same retailer was not necessary. 

Ministers are also suggesting that, in the event that they are delivering a new item, all online merchants and sellers offer a free collection service for used equipment such as TVs, fridges, freezers, washing machines, and dishwashers. 

But Helen Dickinson, the chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, told The Telegraph the new rules could cost firms ‘£1 billion or more’ per year.

The government acknowledges that the expenses may be passed on to consumers in the form of increased pricing in a paper that accompanies the consultation.

Ms Dickinson said: ‘We think [the bill would be] in the hundreds of millions of pounds plus and could be £1 billion or more.’

Senior Tory MP David Jones, a former Brexit minister, described the plans as ‘awful’ and akin to a stealth ‘toaster tax’.

He told the newspaper, ‘This is exactly the sort of burdensome regulation that we thought we were getting rid of when we left the EU.

‘This is an extraordinary imposition on businesses, and the government should have nothing to do with it.

‘I think it is completely unreasonable that they should expect retailers to do that.’

During the public comment period, which ends on March 7th, DEFRA highlighted how the global purchasing of electronic items is a “significant driver of emissions.” 

‘By 2040, on current trends, it is estimated that worldwide emissions from the production and use of electronics could rise to a level exceeding half that associated with the global transportation sector today,’ it added.

One proposal in the consultation is for ‘internet sellers and retailers to provide a free of charge collection on delivery service, requiring the free takeback of large domestic appliances such as washing machines, dishwashers, fridges, freezers, and TVs’. 

Another is for ‘internet sellers with a turnover of over £100,000 of electrical sales each year to offer take-back of unwanted equipment on a one-for-one, like-for-like basis’.

There seems to be an ongoing plot to figure out how to defraud us of our money, and a toaster tax sounds like lunacy.

Forget about toasters; what about all those old batteries from electric cars that need to be buried in landfills?

It’s amusing how Net Zero appears to be generating revenue for Mayor Sadiq Khan and the government.

After the WEF bankers and their henchmen have wrung every last bit of money from us, Net Zero is the proletariat’s expected bank balance.

If we ever get to Net Zero, the rich and powerful will say we need to be minus Net Zero, and after that, they will make up some more nonsense, like daylight-changing tax, if they haven’t thought of it already. Wake up, people; we’re being conned.

This Net Zero nonsense needs to be thrown into a landfill. It’s no more than a cash grab for the government and councils, and I’m surprised we haven’t already got a fresh air tax, but watch this space, folks.

These cunning Net Zero fines are the same as the 17th-century Window Tax—essentially, they are the result of a desperate government looking for any way to get money, no matter how implausible.

A Man Sets Himself On Fire Outside The Israeli Embassy In Washington, D.C.

In front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, DC, a guy has set himself on fire. 

Authorities responded to the embassy around 1 p.m. on Sunday and found the man with burn injuries, the Metropolitan Police Department told DailyMail.com.

He is in critical condition and was taken to the hospital by DC Fire and EMS with critical and life-threatening injuries.’

A spokesperson from the Secret Service told DailyMail.com, ‘The U.S. Secret Service, Uniformed Division, responded to the 3400 Block of International Drive, NW, DC, regarding an individual that was experiencing a possible medical/mental health emergency.’

‘DC Fire & EMS responded to the scene and treated the individual prior to transport to an area hospital.’

Explosive Ordnance Disposal from the Metropolitan Police Department was dispatched to the area in relation to a suspicious vehicle that could be associated with the individual. 

First responders were visible in a video that was shared on X, the platform that was once known as Twitter, outside the embassy. 

The investigation is ongoing.

The Israeli embassy released a statement after the incident, reading: ‘On Sunday, 2/25, at around 1 PM, a man set himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy in Washington and was taken to the hospital by ambulance. The man is unknown. No Embassy staff were injured and are safe.’

A similar incident occurred in December when a pro-Palestine protestor set themselves ablaze outside the Israeli consulate in Atlanta.

The city’s police chief, Darin Schierbaum, described the incident as an ‘extreme act of political protest,’ and said a Palestinian flag was recovered from the scene.

A security officer who tried to stop the self-immolation was among the two injured parties, at least.

This man will be forgotten by tomorrow, and he has accomplished nothing because what is today’s news will be tomorrow’s history.

They say everything happens for a reason, and sometimes that reason is because these people have been indoctrinated and then they make bad decisions. Thankfully, he didn’t set anyone else on fire; otherwise, the situation could have been a lot worse.

This would have been so painful, and if the man doesn’t die, he will wish that he had, and for what? And he would have sacrificed himself for a group that couldn’t care less about him.

Before Sir John Gielgud Was Knighted, Whitehall Probed His ‘Notorious’ Gay Life

Sir John Gielgud was considered one of the greatest stage actors of the 1950s, famous for his portrayal of Hamlet and comic roles such as the lead in Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest.

However, before being knighted in 1953, he was looked into for his “notorious” private life as a gay man during the height of his fame, The Mail on Sunday can disclose. 

Gielgud, later star of Hollywood films such as Arthur, Gandhi, and Chariots of Fire, was the subject of ‘special enquiries’ by civil servants. 

The inquiries are detailed in government papers that have been obtained by this newspaper under freedom of information laws and which are published for the first time today.

The MoS asked the Cabinet Office to provide copies of documents relating to the awarding of honours to Gielgud, which also included references to his private life and his homosexuality.

The documents show that civil servants were keen to ensure they could rely on the star’s discretion before awarding him one of the highest honours in the land. 

A 1977 document includes the note,Kn ‘He was the subject of special inquiries in 1949 and 1952; these proved positive. No papers kept.’

In 1953, officials considering his suitability for a knighthood compared him with ballet star Anton Dolin. One wrote: ‘He is more discreet than Dolin but all the same notorious.’

Gielgud, who died in 2000 at age 96, was knighted in the Queen’s Coronation Honours. Shortly afterwards, he was arrested and fined for ‘cottaging’—meeting men for sex in a public lavatory—in Chelsea, West London.

His arrest was part of a clampdown overseen by Home Secretary David Maxwell Fyfe, who regarded male homosexuality as a ‘plague’. But Maxwell Fyfe’s stance would not appear to have been shared by theatregoers.

A terrified Gielgud had assumed reports about his arrest while he was appearing in a production of A Day by the Sea in Liverpool would end his career. Instead, he was greeted by a standing ovation.

The Cabinet Office papers also reveal Sir John was considered for a life peerage in 1990.

Gielgud never discussed his private life or his arrest in public. He once told a fellow actor: ‘I do admire people like you and Ian McKellen for coming out, but I can’t be doing with all that myself.’

One actor said last night, ‘Even if they did note his notoriety, it didn’t stop them from honouring him. It’d be interesting to know if notoriously promiscuous heterosexuals were subjected to the same scrutiny.’

Last night, the Cabinet Office declined to respond.

Sir John Gielgud was convicted of ‘cottaging’ (persistently importuning for an immoral purpose) in a public lavatory just off the Fulham Road. He was fined £10 and advised to consult a doctor.

The number of convictions for gross indecency increased significantly in the early 1950s. It was forbidden for males of any age to engage in sexual relations with one another, and those who did so frequently received harsh jail terms.

It was a time when ‘pretty police officers’ acting as ‘agent provocateurs’ enthusiastically engaged in witch hunts, which were encouraged and supported by the established Church, the popular press, and then the Home Secretary, and the judiciary up to and including the Lord Chief Justice.

Authors Rupert Croft-Cooke and Alan Turing, who assisted in cracking the Enigma code at Bletchley Park, were among the people detained.

Sir John Gielgud was widely respected as one of the greatest actors Britain had ever seen. Although he never denied being homosexual, Gielgud always made an effort to be discreet about it.

Gielgud experienced the highs and lows of being a public figure in 1953. He lived and worked in a period when male homosexuality was outlawed and public opinion was harsh.

He received a knighthood for his work for services to the theatre but was arrested for ‘cottaging’ in the same year.

Gielgud avoided Hollywood for over a decade for fear of being denied entry because of his arrest, and he felt humiliated by the ordeal. Some believe that his case helped the campaign to decriminalise homosexuality in England and Wales.

In Response To His ‘Islamophobic, Racist’ Remarks, Lee Anderson Is Suspended From The Conservative Party 

Lee Anderson has been suspended by the Conservative Party after he refused to apologise for ‘Islamophobic, racist’ comments where he claimed that London Mayor Sadiq Khan was controlled by ‘Islamists’.

A spokesperson for the party’s chief whip, Simon Hart, said the decision had been made following the former Tory deputy chairman’s ‘refusal to apologise’ for the remarks made on Friday.

Pressure had been mounting on Rishi Sunak to take action over the comments from the Ashfield MP, with Mr Khan saying the ‘deafening silence’ of the Prime Minister and his Cabinet amounted to condoning racism.

A spokesperson for Mr Hart said: ‘Following his refusal to apologise for comments made yesterday, the Chief Whip has suspended the Conservative whip from Lee Anderson MP.’

A Conservative source was defending Mr Anderson last night and this morning before he was stripped of party support at around 3 pm this afternoon.

This comes after Sadiq Khan hit out against Anderson earlier this afternoon for ‘pouring fuel on the fire of anti-Muslim hatred’.

The ex-deputy Tory chairman said on GB News last night that Khan, the first Muslim Mayor of London, is controlled by Islamists and that he has ‘given our capital city away to his mates’.

Mr Anderson said last night, ‘I don’t actually believe that these Islamists have got control of our country, but what I do believe is they’ve got control of Khan, they’ve got control of London, and they’ve got control of Starmer as well.

‘Again, this stems with Khan; he’s actually given our capital city away to his mates.

‘Beware, because if you let Labour in through the back door, expect more of this and expect our cities to be taken over by these lunatics.’

Speaking to Sky News, Mr Khan said the comments from the senior Conservative MP ‘pour fuel on the fire of anti-Muslim hatred’.

He added, ‘We’ve seen over the last two days confirmation that over the last few months, there had been an increase in anti-Muslim cases by more than 330%. 

‘I am afraid the deafening silence from Rishi Sunak and from the cabinet is them condoning this racism.

‘I am afraid it confirms to many people across the country that there’s a hierarchy when it comes to racism.

‘I think it’s really important to call out antisemitism, it’s really important to call out misogyny, it’s really important to call out homophobia, but surely it must also be important to call out anti-Muslim hatred.

‘My concern is there will be people across the country—people who are Muslim or look like Muslims—who will be really concerned about entering into politics because they know that if these are the comments being made about me by a senior Conservative, what chance do they have?’

Following his suspension, Mr Anderson said: ‘Following a call with the Chief Whip, I understand the difficult position that I have put both he and the Prime Minister in with regard to my comments. 

‘I fully accept that they had no option but to suspend the whip in these circumstances. 

‘However, I will continue to support the Government’s efforts to call out extremism in all its forms, be that anti-semitism or islamophobia.’

He said he was not sure why members of the cabinet were not ‘calling this out’ and condemning Anderson’s words.

This morning, the Defence Secretary said he ‘wouldn’t phrase things like that’, when asked whether Anderson’s comments about Sadiq Khan were acceptable, but he stopped short of condemning them.

Lee Anderson speaks as a voice for those who feel they’re no longer afforded one in their own country.

Nice, hardworking British families will hopefully send these disgusting racists to the political trash of history. We don’t want nasty racists in our nation, but these Tories think they can win the next General Election by encouraging hatred as a diversion from all their years of failure.

It’s time for Rishi Sunak to call for elections. We’d like to think that this will make things better, but in reality, it won’t since politicians only speak for themselves and never the people.

I’m still waiting for any of you raging, shrieking Brexit votes to explain literally how this man literally handed London to his mates on a plate.

Ninety percent of the populace understands the truth; why doesn’t this administration just accept it?

Lee Anderson should not have to apologise for speaking out and for daring to support hard-working, law-abiding Brits. Rishi Sunak, Jeremy Hunt, and David Cameron have shown they are not working for us, the people. They were too busy ignoring the truth and giving our highest-ever taxes away to fund war et cetera, while leaving the country to be taken over by crime, anti-social behaviour, and extremists. Khan needs to be dragged out of office because he is the enemy of the state.

Some thought that Khan was doing some good things, like cycling highways, but his awful renaming of Overground Lines was a tragic confirmation of the relentlessly woke times we live in, and this man clearly needs some severe psychiatric help.

Rishi Sunak is a child in big man pants. He was never our choice; he wasn’t even elected.

With Brexit, life has become quite miserable. Even though it wasn’t great before, it’s now considerably worse.

Rishi Sunak is a disaster. To be honest, every leader they put in place is a disaster.

The Tory Party has been infiltrated, and it can’t be saved. You can’t tell who’s who anymore, and have you noticed that Rishi Sunak gets rid of anyone who’s a threat to him?

Sadly, England is in the toilet, and those born here will be lost forever.

All politicians know how the general public feels, and they all know what we want. The trouble is, they’re only in the job for what they can get out of it. They’re not there to benefit the British people. Gone are the days when politicians wanted to change the country for the better. Now they only want to make changes to increase their own wealth and power.

Lutfur Rahman’s Running Of Tower Hamlets Council Is Being Reviewed

Government inspectors are being sent into Tower Hamlets Council after concerns about how it is being run under its independent mayor, Lutfur Rahman.

They have been asked to look at a range of issues, including how money is spent and senior job appointments.

Mr Rahman was removed as mayor of the east London borough in 2015 after being found guilty of electoral fraud but was re-elected two years ago.

The mayor expressed his disappointment but also his willingness to work with others. 

The review will look at budgets and financial planning, the appointment of senior management posts, the use of policy advisers, and the “policy and practice of grant-making.”

The former chief executive of a London borough, Kim Bromley-Derry, has been appointed to lead the inspection.

The inspectors have been instructed to report back by the end of May on “whether the standards expected for effective and convenient local government are being upheld.”

Department of Levelling Up, Housing, and Communities (DLUHC) officials have become concerned by the “significant churn” of top officers at the council since Mr Rahman took over.

Three senior management positions in the areas of communities, housing and regeneration, and children’s services are now open. Four director positions are also up for filling by the council. 

It is understood that the council’s monitoring officer, fulfilling a key legal role, has recently decided to leave.

  • Concern grows over election fraud mayor’s spending
  • Former banned mayor re-elected in Tower Hamlets

The government has also asked inspectors to look at “the use of resources for elections, the maintenance of the independence of the Returning Officer, and the arrangements to bring services such as Tower Hamlets Homes and leisure services in-house.”

Ten years ago, government-appointed commissioners were brought in to oversee Tower Hamlets following a Best Value study conducted in 2014. 

Councils undergo Best Value assessments to make sure they are providing services that are affordable, effective, and efficient while also continuously improving. 

In a letter to Mr Bromley-Derry, a DLUHC official said they were “concerned” with the authority’s ability to comply with its “Best Value Duty”.

It says DLUHC Secretary Michael Gove wants assurance that Tower Hamlets is “continuing to make arrangements to secure continuous improvement in the way in which its functions are exercised, having regard to a combination of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness.”

It adds that the appointment of a handful of advisers to Mr Rahman creates “the risk of a ‘dual council’, sidelining officers of the authority in decision-making, which, in turn, risks replicating the circumstances in which decisions were made up to 2014 that were corrupt and/or failed in the authority’s Best Value Duty”.

It appears that London is the epicentre of global terrorism, shielded by the state and legal assistance.

It is mind-boggling that only in Great Britain can state and local governments provide financial support to organisations such as these, but I doubt this will surprise anyone reading this article.

Our government is the enemy within, but only because we let them.

There should be a Downing Street probe as well, but I bet your bottom dollar that won’t happen, and nothing will be done about this lily-livered set of career politicians. Just how big did the writing on the wall have to get before reality finally set in?

Welcome to Great Britain in the 21st century, where if you want real change, you have to scratch some politicians or MPs anus in the hope that it might ejaculate some form of reform.

Hamas’ Attack On Israel Triples Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes In Britain 

After the Hamas terror strikes in Israel on October 7, there has been a more than threefold increase in anti-Muslim hate incidents in the UK, with British Muslim women being the target of most of these occurrences. 

Islamophobia watchdog Tell MAMA recorded 2,010 cases of possible hate crimes against Muslims since Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis, mostly civilians, in Israel four months ago—335 percent of those compared to the same time a year ago.

Sixty-five percent of the 535 documented instances of abusive behaviour—which includes assaults, threats, and vandalism—were directed at British Muslim women. 

According to Home Office figures obtained by the Mail, Muslims have been the target of hate crimes for the most number of years, accounting for 44% of all instances, for seven consecutive years.

Tory MPs demanded last night that the government take further action to combat hate speech directed towards Muslims. 

Former minister Paul Bristow said: ‘There has been a sharp rise in Islamophobia across the country in recent months, and I know first-hand from speaking to my constituents in Peterborough how worried they are about these rises.

‘What has taken me back is just how blatant Islamophobia can be without being called out.

‘I have spoken to many British Muslims who want to see the bloodshed in Gaza end, but fear speaking up on issue could lead to anti-Muslim attacks. This should never be the case.’

The government and everyone in society should do more to prevent Islamophobia and assaults on people because of their beliefs, according to Mark Eastwood, a Tory MP and member of the APPG for British Muslims. 

‘Muslims in my constituency in Bolton have contributed so much to the wider town and region; they should be praised for this contribution, not persecuted.’

Just over half of the cases recorded since October 7 included online hatred, such as threatening British Muslims in a future ‘civil war’ or being told to ‘f*** off to a Muslim country’.

One now-banned account on X, formerly Twitter, asked users who would win in an ‘upcoming civil war in Britain’, giving them the option of ‘British’ or ‘Muslim’ people.

The startling statistics were released less than a week after a Jewish security charity said that anti-Semitic incidents in the UK hit a record high in 2023, illustrating the rift brought about by the Middle East crisis. 

In 2023, the number of anti-Jewish hate incidents reported by the Community Security Trust increased to 4,103 from 1,662 the previous year. 

I’m hoping that this will all end quickly. Drama and frenzy are popular. Still, another bandwagon will most likely appear shortly.

What they shouldn’t be doing is putting those ridiculous flags in places. If they don’t want to integrate into our society, then they should just leave. Nobody is forcing them to stay.

The more serious problem is the overt anti-British sentiment that permeates our nation on a daily basis.

Why is this going on in our country? It has nothing to do with us, and demonstrators should be fined because no other country would allow it.

This is what happens when people move to our country; they try to force their beliefs on others already living here, yet our authorities side with them.

Our government has created an alien nation, so expect alienation.

If their values don’t fit our values, they are, of course, free to leave at any time they want.

I really don’t recognise the country that I grew up in. Not that I like it any less, but I wouldn’t want to be a young person now, and given the way it is, I certainly wouldn’t bring children into it. 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started