Our Broken Care System Left A Disabled Man With A Sandwich And Two Drinks For 60 Hours

Steven King hasn’t had a hot meal for as long as he can remember. He hasn’t had lunch for years, and hasn’t even been out of the house for three years, he said.

In 2019, the disabled former retail worker said he was left entirely on his own, with just a sandwich and two glasses of drink for 60 hours. He was unable to visit the toilet or take his medication and said he was told to contact 999 if he needed a drink. This was an experience that left him contemplating taking his own life.

Steven lives on his own and needs the support of carers to support him with the most crucial tasks, which include personal care, preparing food and taking his medication. However, the lack of care staff is appalling, and that deficiency is being experienced by millions across the country. One which has left Steven dangerously isolated.

He said, not knowing if people will turn up and who it will be, and that the whole care system was broken.

He said that there aren’t enough carers and there aren’t enough people wanting to do the job and that even on good days, he said that he has to survive on a sandwich or Weetabix for breakfast until someone comes along eventually to make him his tea.

Anne Pridmore, 83, who has cerebral palsy said that the crisis in care was terrifying. That it wasn’t getting any better, and that it made you feel extremely vulnerable, and that a lot of people who are disabled have to rely on help from carers because they don’t have any relations or friends they can call on, but she said it wasn’t always like this.

She said that she’s seen things change for the worse. It’s been happening for a long time, and it used to be extremely easy to get people to work as a carer, but now it’s just a nightmare.

Carers are not rewarded or paid the correct wages, in fact, you’d likely get paid much more walking someone’s dogs.

Age UK said that 2.6 million people in England aged over 50 are unable to get vital care, including hundreds of thousands stuck on waiting lists, and that at Age UK they’re extremely concerned about the plight of all the older people with an unmet need for care, particularly if they’re living alone.

There are some extremely good carers out there who put their best into their job, but in the end, they just burn out because clients die, and they’re manipulated by the company they work for.

These carers are just human beings who have to listen to everyone’s problems, and if that carer is compassionate, they try to make their clients’ lives better and go above and beyond what is needed of them.

Care work can be heartbreaking and soul-destroying, and it’s not a job that everyone can do. You really have to be a certain kind of person to do the job.

Being a carer can be an extremely rewarding career looking after vulnerable people, but the wages make it extremely hard if you’re a sole earner, and if you want to make more money, then you would have to work extremely long hours, working seven days a week, and also over the Christmas period.

Domiciliary care has always been a badly paid job, with those care workers only being paid for the time they spend with the client, with no payment for travelling time or fuel or bus fares.

It takes a certain kind of person to do domiciliary care. You’re essentially on your own with the client and their needs may be complex. You may also find yourself getting covered in their bodily waste or find them dead in bed when you go and get them up in the morning.

This is not a menial job, and these carers should be paid much more than they do now. The problem is our Government don’t care about the elderly, they’d probably rather they die so that they don’t have to be supported because in their eyes they’re a burden to society.

Can Rishi Sunak Win The Election Next May?

Rishi Sunak is set to slash the despised inheritance tax and secure the triple lock that guarantees state pension payments ahead of the next election, fuelling speculation he could go to the country as soon as May.

The Prime Minister could make an announcement on IHT before the Conservative Party Conference next week, pledging to lower the death tax when it’s possible and ultimately scrap it.

Cabinet minister Grant Shapps said inheritance tax was deeply unfair but stressed the Government were currently in a fiscal straightjacket. And Labour branded the move ‘an unfunded tax cut of £7.2 billion per year’ for the most well-off.

At the same time, Rishi Sunak is set to rule out breaking the pension pledge despite the enormous cost to the Treasury of keeping it, after being told it would be political suicide to try to cut payments to the old. And he’s looking to overrule opposition from Labour to shire Tories to scrap environmental regulations on housebuilding to allow 114,000 more homes to be built in the countryside.

Treasury officials had been discussing taking a one-off break from the triple lock, which raises pensions each April by whatever is highest out of average earnings rises inflation or 2.5 per cent, due to inflation running at nearly 7 per cent.

There had been debate about ditching the guarantee in the next manifesto, but a newspaper outlet understands that voters’ response to the idea of axing the policy has been so negative that Tory strategists have ruled out any changes.

It comes as a newspaper outlet reported that local authorities are being told to be election-ready for the Spring, suggesting a general election could be held at the same time as local elections at the start of May, but No 10 declined to comment on the speculation.

The Prime Minister had refused to commit to the policy beyond next year’s 8.5 per cent rise in state pensions after experts said it could add up to £45 billion a year to the welfare bill by 2050.

A Government source said that fears over the growing burden of the measure, which was introduced by the Coalition Government in the 2010 Budget, have been overridden in No 10.

Some Tory MPs and campaigners in the upcoming by-elections in Mid Bedfordshire and Tamworth have voiced fears that abandoning the policy would cost the party dearly at the ballot box. The triple lock has been seen as crucial in securing the ‘silver vote’ for the Conservatives in the past four General Elections.

It’s called double taxation folks. You work extraordinarily hard, pay your taxes and then end up paying additional taxes over and over again. The Government are taxing you to death and either people do realise it but won’t say anything against the establishment because they’re too frightened or they just can’t be bothered.

They increase the pension age over and over because once you’re dead, you no longer exist and you’re not theirs to worry about.

The only thing that we can be sure of is death and taxes.

What the Government don’t seem to realise that that without the people the country would collapse. We are the hard-working taxpayers that built this country, and the people should be treated with respect, not everyone else that comes to this country.

It’s okay to pay your taxes, but it will have very little effect on you if you’re dead.

We are being taxed over and over again and then it’s being given to someone else, and people should never say that they’re used to it, but living is tough. If people say they’re used to it gives the Government a reason to tax you even more.

After A Viral Video Showed A Young Black Girl Being Skipped During The Medal Ceremony, Gymnastics Ireland Apologizes For Racism 

Gymnastics Ireland is embroiled in a racism row after a startling video showed a young black competitor being skipped over during a medal ceremony as her white counterparts were each given an award.

The Team USA gymnast was among scores online condemning the actions of the official, writing on X that there was no room for racism in any sport or at all.

The video shows a lineup of young gymnasts awaiting their awards, with the little girl excitedly waiting for her medal before being ignored.

Gymnastics Ireland has now apologised for the incident after the girl’s parents alleged the snub was due to racism.

The sports body said it engaged immediately with the competitor’s parents following their complaint over the incident.

The girl’s mother said the family were very upset at how their daughter had been treated by Gymnastics Ireland and that they believe she was ignored because she’s black, the Irish Independent reports.

Many have pointed out that the official strode off with the last remaining medal at the end of the clip, with all the children in the lineup receiving one apart from the girl.

Gymnastics Ireland said that it engaged with the woman, who’s now no longer a member of the sporting body after she decided not to renew her membership.

They said she accepted fully that what had happened had not been acceptable but stressed that it had not been intentional. The official concerned said that upon realising the mistake they immediately rectified it and ensured that the competitor concerned was presented with her medal before she left the Field of Play (FoP).

The official also voiced profound regret for what they described as an honest mistake and requested the opportunity to apologise in person to the competitor and her family. This request was initially declined.

A written apology provided by the identified person has since been issued to the competitor and her family.

In a statement which said that initially, they attempted to address the matter through the informal process of their discipline and complaints policy. However, following a series of communications with the parents they informed Gymnastics Ireland that they wouldn’t be engaging in the process and were seeking legal advice.

Footage of the presentation in Dublin in March 2022 has since gone viral online.

This is truly awful, the poor child, and what was the explanation from the medal giver? Evidently, it was a mistake. She should have been disciplined because she carried out a spiteful, despicable act, that, on the surface, seems to be a racist-driven act. She just strolled off with the medal still in her hand and she didn’t go back to rectify it, which looks very intentional.

This definitely did not look like a mistake. In what way could it have been a mistake? This woman should have been publicly sacked, but she quit before that happened. She should have been named and shamed.

This young girl is owed one big apology. And how was this unintentional? She had one job to do!

Whether this was a simple mistake or intentional, the poor child would have been left devastated because while all her fellow gymnasts were receiving their medals, she was being overlooked, and this girl will remember this sickening, hateful incident for the rest of her life.

She must have been heartbroken. Hopefully, this won’t hold her back and she will end up being a super gymnast and win tons of medals.

Ulez Cameras Now Have Their Own Personal Security Feature

Mobile Ulez cameras are being protected by dedicated security units in a bid to stop vandals.

Footage was shared on social media of an activist approaching a man and a woman sitting in a red Renault Clio and asking if they were security, prompting one of them to nod.

The activist then says that there were two of them and this was public money, and that they were just keeping an eye on it to make sure no one smashes it.

In response, the male guard shook his head. A newspaper outlet has contacted Transport for London, which operates the Ulez scheme, to ask whether security teams now protect all mobile Ulez cameras.

Vandals were out in force, with images from Dartford, southeast London, showing a set of traffic lights equipped with a Ulez camera that had been knocked over onto a pavement.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan defended the controversial policy during a UN climate summit in New York by describing it as the best ever two-for-one offer, adding that the same things that cause climate change cause air pollution.

He said, that nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and carbon emissions. If you deal with one, you deal with the other. But Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said Sadiq Khan’s measures were not proving effective.

He told BBC London that the problem with the mayor’s plan is that it does nothing for climate change, and was actually very poor air pollution and that it was costing the people a fortune.

Neil Garratt, leader of the Conservative group in the London Assembly, said that he was alarmed to hear the mayor claim that expanding Ulez would cut carbon emissions. He said that it wouldn’t and he knew that because his own report spells it out, so why was Sadiq Khan claiming otherwise at the conference?

The Mayor expended Ulez to cover the entirety of London several weeks ago, clobbering thousands more motorists with the £12.50 day-to-day charge.

Footage emerged of a protester climbing a ladder to block a camera on top of a Transport for London van on Rainham Road in east London, with locals rallying around the man, with one writing on Facebook: ‘Let’s hear it for the lad sitting on the ladders blocking the Ulez camera on Rainham Road. This made my morning, power to the people.’

Elsewhere in Ickenham, in the borough of Hillingdon, vigilante vandals sprayed foam used for filling cracks and insulating lofts over two cameras, stopping it from catching motorists.

How much is this boneheadedness costing the taxpayer? Evidently, there’s no fixing stupid!

Sadiq Khan said it was a great two-for-one offer as it tackled both air quality and climate change. In that case, why didn’t he attend the conference in New York by video link? Without a doubt, his words don’t match his actions.

Could it be that it’s because green issues are an excuse, and that Ulez is about raising money and the New York trip was about spending money on a wonderful work jolly?

This is all coming out of the taxpayer’s money, which is our money, and who gave Sadiq Khan a license to waste it? These people guarding the cameras must have an extremely low moral threshold.

This is what dictatorship looks like folks!

And how did Sadiq Khan get to New York to do his address? Did he grow some wings, not of course not, he flew by aircraft. What does he think that an aeroplane doesn’t emit pollution? What fantasy world does he live in?

Russell Brand’s Sex Assault Claim Is Being Investigated By Met Police

The Metropolitan Police says it’s investigating a report of sexual assault in Soho in 2003 after allegations were levied against Russell Brand, as the comedian suspended the remaining dates of his latest tour.

On Saturday, a newspaper outlet and Channel 4’s Dispatches reported allegations of abusive and predatory behaviour including rape, sexual assault and emotional abuse said to have been committed by the presenter between 2006 and 2013.

Russell Brand completely repudiates the allegations and insists all his relationships had been consensual, taking to the stage on Saturday for his Bipolarisation tour as expected.

But on Monday promoters for the tour confirmed that the remaining dates in Windsor, Plymouth and Wolverhampton had been shelved.

They said in a statement that they were postponing those few remaining addiction charity fundraiser shows. They didn’t like doing it, but they knew people would understand.

The alleged sexual assault evidently took place in Soho three years before the four sexual assaults that Russell Brand has been accused of between 2006 and 2013.

A spokesperson for the Met said that on Sunday, 17 September, the Met received a report of a sexual assault which was alleged to have taken place in Soho in central London in 2003.

The spokesperson said that officers are in contact with the woman and will be providing her with support, and said that they first spoke with the Sunday Times on Saturday, 16 September and had since made further approaches to The Sunday Times and Channel 4 to ensure that anyone who believes they’ve been the victim of a sexual offence is aware of how to report this to the police.

They said they will continue to encourage anyone who believes they may have been a victim of a sexual offence, no matter how long ago it was, to contact them.

Allegations of historic sexual abuse demand detailed and professional handling. They frequently come out of the blue leaving the accused and their families feeling dumbfounded and devastated.

There’s no time limit on when sexual offences can be prosecuted in the United Kingdom, and of course, historic abuse is not treated any less seriously by the police or the courts.

There are far too many people who have been accused of a crime, even though there’s been no DNA evidence. They spend years in prison and then it’s discovered that they were always innocent, and they never actually caught the real perpetrator who’s probably out there, roaming the streets.

Anybody can accuse somebody else of rape or sexual assault, but it doesn’t always mean they did the crime. It might seem like a clear-cut case of sexual assault. However, a case should not be determined by what one believes, but rather by what the investigation reveals and what can be established 100 per cent.

DNA analysis has had an unprecedented impact on the criminal justice system for an extremely long time. It has driven investigations along and made prosecuting those alleged to have perpetrated the offence easier.

Science can now provide focus or direction to an investigation. Help develop a case theory, and clear suspects or those wrongfully convicted with more certainty. As a result, the criminal justice community has become highly reliant on DNA analysis, and it also permits those who have died because of a sexual act to talk for themselves through that DNA.

If I was on a jury for a sexual assault, I would want to see DNA analysis, and many juries and lawyers alike expect to see DNA evidence presented during a trial, but with historical sexual assault there is no DNA, so putting it bluntly we have to look at the evidence that the victims have given in court and try to determine if the suspected perpetrator is guilty or not. It’s a bit like being at the casino, rolling the dice and hoping that your dice rolls right.

But what happens in a “he said, she said” case? Or what about a case where there is no DNA available because it’s historical? What do we do, roll the dice and hope that we made the right decision in putting a person in prison and then finding out years later they were completely innocent?

On the 9th June 2010, during PMs Questions, Prime Minister David Cameron admitted that between 8-10 per cent of all rape allegations were false.

These were ones proved to be false, but how many more fall through the net putting innocent men in prison for offences they did not commit?

Sadly, over the past 25 years, justice in this area of criminal activity has been manipulated to convict more efficiently than in any other area of criminality, and the rights of the defendant have diminished and it’s ‘justice at any price’, and it has ensured that more innocents have been locked up more than ever before.

The problem with our legal system starts with the first steps you take in the courtroom. You’re escorted into a glass enclosure, then locked in with a security guard for company, and this is how the jury first sees you, looking guilty.

And that’s a wrap, folks!

A Secret Trip To Maui By Ivanka Trump To Feed Wildfire Victims

Ivanka Trump made a secret trip to Maui a few weeks ago to distribute meals and critical supplies to residents still recuperating from the devasting wildfires.

The former first daughter joined CityServe International on a humanitarian mission where they distributed 250,000 prepackaged meals for displaced families affected by the biggest wildfire in US history.

They visited a Lahaina church that’s acting as a food pantry and met with residents who are working to rebuild their lives.

Dressed in a blank tank top and green cargo pants, Trump sported a name tag that read ‘Iva’ as she distributed fresh produce locally grown in Maui.

During her visit, Ivanka Trump hands out fresh vegetables, delivers prepackaged supplies and poses for photographs.

CityServe said in a statement that her humble presence lifted spirits and reminded the people of Lahaina that they’re not forgotten.

CityServe said that amidst the tears being shed, there were tangible signs of hope and love, and with the arrival of meals and supplies, their partners and team alongside Ivanka Trump were hefting boxes of supplies, consoling survivors, and passing out meals to those who’d lost everything.

There are about 6,000 displaced residents staying in Maui hotels, while another 1,100 are in Airbnb rentals.

CityServe said that Ivanka Trump and the group distributed food, water, local produce, gift cards and other needed supplies to displaced families and individuals staying at hotels, local distribution centres and pantries near Lahaina.

The group was also providing gas cards and air filters to residents, who were being urged not to drink the water and stay away from fire-damaged areas.

According to CityServe, Trump also used her connections to get other companies to donate goods to those in Maui.

Next week, a 747 loaded with $1 million worth of supplies will head toward Maui with e-bikes, electric scooters, electronics, toys, dry foods, small appliances, ukuleles, and several pallets of Jockey clothing, all because of Ivanka’s connections, the group said.

The wildfires are under control across the island but damage remains in the 2,170 acres burned. The death toll stands at 97 and 66 people remain missing.

The burn area of Maui remains restricted to authorised personnel as officials clean up the potentially dangerous ash and other debris. There are an estimated 2,200 damaged or destroyed structures.

The cleanup could take months. The early cost estimation is $5.5 billion.

Ivanka Trump not only helps these people but she also does it with a smile on her face. However, it does make me wonder if she does this good deed out of the kindness of her heart, or does she get paid for doing it?

This was supposed to be a secret trip to Maui, yet she ended up on the front page of a newspaper outlet, but then these things do tend to get leaked to the media, and given that she didn’t give her full name, but rather a nickname suggests that she was there to help, and not there to film footage for a self-promotional mockumentary.

Unfortunately, there are some extremely judgemental people out there. Someone does something good for a change and people get all angry about it, and let’s face it, she’d done more than most of us have.

However, Ivanka Trump has lived a charmed life. She hung about with an ambitious cohort of young girls, most of whom lived in grand townhouses or duplexes.

She wasn’t like most girls and if she wanted to go out it was always under the supervision of her father’s security team, borrowing his father’s credit card to go shopping.

Ivanka spent her career creating and exemplifying a more polished and intellectual offshoot of the Trump trademark. She was more sophisticated, and not as grandiloquent or nouveau riche as her father had perfected, and Ivanka was courteous, classy, and fun to be around when she was in the public eye.

However, in private, the harsher, more Trumpian edges sometimes poked out.

She never wore a Halloween ensemble that wasn’t flattering, which meant that she usually showed up at costume parties looking gorgeous and uninteresting. She always stopped at McDonald’s for cheeseburgers, and she swore, and of course, she had the Trump radar for status, money, power and her father’s instinct to throw others under the bus to protect herself.

RUSSELL BRAND AND ACCUSATION

Russell Brand has been accused of rape, and he’s been accused of raping a businesswoman and grooming a 16-year-old schoolgirl for sex.

At the moment it’s all accusation. However, the Metropolitan Police have said that they’ve been made aware of the media information about a string of allegations of sexual aggression, and have urged any alleged victims to come forward.

Allegedly, one woman has said that Russell Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. Another, whom he evidently referred to as ‘the child’, told how the presenter targeted her when she was 16 years old and still at school, and he was aged 30.

But in an impressive fight back, Russell Brand took to social media to completely deny this string of extremely serious criminal allegations.

The rebellious Russell Brand still performed a London gig, telling his cheering audience of 2,000 fans that he loved them.

I’m not saying that he did or did not do what he’s been accused of. In fact, I would rather sit on the fence for this one, and perhaps we will never know. After all, the media only tells you what you want to believe.

Russell Brand has been out there a lot, revealing a lot concerning government and media criminality and World agendas. It could be that they just want him to shut up. After all, it seems extremely easy these days to ‘cancel’ people.

Russell Brand has not been criminally charged and there’s no indication at this point that the police are actively investigating these claims.

There’s no doubt that when he was younger that he was extremely promiscuous, but that doesn’t make him a rapist, does it?

However, the former Tory Justice Secretary Robert Buckland has called for the BBC and Channel 4 to investigate allegations about Russell Brands conduct, and that they should ask themselves if any red flags were raised at the time.

Sadly, we live in a society where a man can be branded a rapist by accusation alone, and that’s where tyranny lies.

People shouldn’t be treated as criminals unless they’re convicted as criminals, and this includes Russell Brand.

I certainly don’t believe in trial by accusation, and you should be innocent until proven guilty.

Accusations destroy men’s careers.

Accusations from 18 years ago aren’t proof, it’s just one person’s word, and that’s not enough to condemn a man. It’s historic, it’s archaic and shouldn’t even be allowed in court unless there’s DNA evidence to establish that he did what those people and media said he’d done.

We need hard evidence to prove that Russell Brand did this. Evidence he did this, then he deserves to go to jail, lack of evidence, then leave it alone, and victims of sexual misdemeanours would be more believable if they didn’t wait such a long time to make their accusations.

Even if these faceless women who’ve accused Russell Brand of rape came forward, where’s the evidence?

That says it all really. Russell Brand gets plastered everywhere for an accusation, yet politicians and such get a free pass with side-eyeing as if they let off a fart in a crowded room.

Make your own mind up!

Middle England’s Streets Choked By Green Obsession

Streets across Britain are being choked with weeds as councils abandon a chemical spray they claim harms wildlife.

Numerous roads which have been well cared for decades have grown into mini jungles over the summer as some councils have stopped using the chemical glyphosate and say other treatments are less effective.

Other councils blame the rainy summer, which restricted spraying, and admit they stopped weeding to trim costs.

Yet middle-class homes have been hit by massive hikes in council tax, pushing the average Band D bill exceeding 2,000 a year.

Some fed-up residents have formed their own weeding patrols.

Yvonne Wright, who’s formed a Civic Pride Team of pensioners to do the job of council contractors in Tottington, in Bury, Greater Manchester said that these plants taking over feels like a scene from The Day of the Triffids.

They use their gardening instruments to eliminate the weeds.

Ms Wright said that their town used to look fantastic but the spread of weeds had been dreadful, and there was a lot of anger because people have highly rated homes for council tax.

Bury Council said weed treatment was expected to get back on track this month after the wet summer made spraying impossible.

In the adorable Victorian terraced streets of Merton, south London weeds are growing up to waist height in places.

Mother of two Laura Montero, 47, said that everyone takes it on themselves to do something about the weeds.

Fellow resident Daisy Laramy-Binks, 37, added that with a lot of the nettles, you’ll get out of your car and sting yourself.

Only 200 yards down the road, which is in the neighbouring area of Wandsworth, residents have spruced up weed-strawn streets by planting flowers around the bottom of trees outside their homes.

In Cambridgeshire, Tory councillor Simon Bywater said he’s had more complaints about weeds than any other issue over the last decade.

He said that people expect councils to look after roads and pavements. It’s one of the basic services for which they pay their taxes.

In Suffolk, accounts clerk Annabel Young, 27, said streets near her Ipswich home look like ‘something from a post-apocalypse disaster movie in which plants start taking over’.

Councils don’t need weed killers, there are plenty of prisoners or those on probation who could do the work. These people could be used to cover these tasks the council say they can’t afford to carry out. The list is infinite.

The trouble is they don’t have enough staff to take prisoners to do their day-to-day tasks, and they’re slammed up for 23 hours a day – another area that’s a governmental disaster zone.

Councils are now attempting to save money, that’s what it’s all about, and then they go on to spend that money on diversity projects.

Our government are happy to support the war going on in Ukraine, but they can’t mend the potholes and cut the weeds.

What they don’t realise or they’re just very stupid is that it’s going to cost the council a fortune in trips and falls as paving slabs start to lift and become uneven.

They may save money now, but in the long run, the roots of some of these plants will destroy the paving, so that when the roads really need to be done, it will cost councils much more and be much more harmful to the environment, with new materials required, lorries coming and going, heavy equipment for the rebuilding of roads.

Yes, of course, we have to protect the wildlife, but we can’t be plagued with weeds either, especially when they’re blocking the view of roundabouts and junctions.

Four Ministers Were Forced To Fly 400 Miles To King’s Private Scottish Mansion For A Taxpayer-Funded Meeting!

The King was facing criticism last night for forcing four Cabinet Ministers, including the Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, to fly 400 miles to his private mansion in Scotland for a taxpayer-funded meeting.

He was accused of wasting an excessive amount of money and climate hypocrisy because the meeting was held partly to formally appoint the new Net Zero Minister in charge of cutting carbon emissions.

Jeremy Hunt, Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, Privy Council President Penny Mordaunt and Energy and Net Zero Secretary Claire Coutinho all flew on the same aircraft to Ayrshire for the Privy Council meeting on Friday at the taxpayers’ expense.

Ordinarily, Privy Council meetings are held monthly at Buckingham Palace or Windsor, but the King held the meeting at Dumfries House to coincide with a party on Friday night to celebrate the 15th anniversary of the public opening of the property, which he purchased for £45 million in 2007.

The King is a well-known climate campaigner and yesterday morning opened a sustainable farming skills centre on the Dumfries House estate.

A few hours later he appeared to have flown to Doncaster racecourse, 230 miles away.

Last night former Lib Dem MP Norman Baker, himself a Privy Council member, said the King’s decision to host a meeting of the council in Scotland ‘drives a coach and horses through any claim he has to be interested in the environment’, adding that this was an outrageous waste of money by King Charles.

A Government spokesman refused to say how much the flight cost or if the aircraft was private or commercial, but emphasised that value for money was a priority.

Charles has been living off the taxpayer and spoiled all his life, even before he was King, and why is he meddling? He’s the King and shouldn’t be interfering in politics.

However, it is his Government, and it’s his consent that forms each government, but should he be meddling, no not really. He gives consent to form a government. That doesn’t give him the privilege to run it.

The King of England doesn’t come across as an extremely smart man, but when it comes to his own entitlement, he’s very smart.

Intellect and academic accomplishments don’t feature prominently on the King’s Curriculum Vitae, but when becoming a royal it’s never been needed.

He lives a privileged life, gets waited on hand and foot and has the very best of everything, so I’d say he hasn’t done bad, smart or not!

People are going to fly, but it’s actually not a good look when you’re taking helicopters and planes to get around when you claim you’re concerned about the environment. In fact, they’re not concerned in the slightest, which makes them hypocrites.

The great King, the eco-warrior, who obviously isn’t that concerned at all. He just wants to tell all us peasants how to live, but not follow his own lifestyle choices.

Clearly, King Charles doesn’t know how to use Zoom, which could have easily been used for the meeting, or better still, schedule the meeting for when he’s back in London, otherwise, it looks like he’s saying, ‘do as I say, not as I do’.

The government told us that ‘we are all in this together’, what a joke that is. Someone should tell them about the poverty and foodbanks in the United Kingdom. That’s like saying, ‘All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others’.

It’s not about climate change. Their top objective is to control by using climate change as a justification.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started