Anger As Train Commuters Face Massive Fare Increases In A Decade

Rail commuters could be hit by the biggest fare increase in a decade with costs possibly being increased by up to 4.8 per cent next year.

The increase, which has yet to be confirmed, could see the average annual season ticket cost increase by £150 to £3,295 for passengers.

Increases are normally linked to the previous July’s Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation, which was confirmed as 3.8 per cent for July 2021 by the Office for National Statistics on Wednesday.

No announcement has been made on what will happen to fares next year, but ticket costs in England and Wales increased by an average of about 2.6 per cent in March, representing RPI for July 2020 plus one percentage point.

Critics called the possible increase eye-watering while campaigners called for fares to be frozen in a bid to encourage commuters back onto trains after the pandemic.

The Scottish Government imposed smaller increases of 1.6 per cent and 0.6 per cent for peak and off-peak travel respectively.

A repeat of the policy in England and Wales next year would see fares increase by an average of 4.8 per cent, which would be the biggest increase since 2012.

That would lead to hikes in the price of annual season tickets such as:

  • Brighton to London (any route): Up £245 to £5,353
  • Liverpool to Manchester (any route): Up £132 to £2,892
  • Neath to Cardiff: Up £89 to £1,941

If the increase goes ahead, the average annual season ticket price could increase by £150 to £3,925 for passengers.

Overall prices will have to increase by £1,100 or 50 per cent in just over a decade.

The highest increase is predicted to be on a season ticket between Birmingham and London Euston which could cost
£12,044 next year, an increase of £4,016 since 2010.

Public transport fares in London are set to be increased by 4.8 per cent in January, under the terms of the UK Government’s bailout of Transport for London which said that RPI plus one percentage point must be used.

Rises in fares for mainline rail services across Britain are controlled by the UK, Scottish and Welsh governments.

A spokesperson for the UK Government’s Department for Transport said that no decision had been made on national rail fares and that the Government was viewing a description of options and they would announce their decision in due course.

Rail fares are usually increased every January, but the coronavirus pandemic meant this year’s increase was delayed until March 1.

It’s no wonder why people aren’t rushing back to the office, but then maybe that’s partly the reason for the fee increase – fewer passengers, more high-priced fees, and it wouldn’t surprise me if they intend to cut the number of trains per hour – people certainly won’t be giving their vehicles up anytime soon.

And the problem we have with rising rail fares is that they go up but nothing ever seems to get better. They’re usually dirty, the seats are stained and uncomfortable, and even with the greatly diminished capacity, they’re crowded at peak times and completely lawless with no crew onboard to check tickets or keep some semblance of order.

People used to enjoy a day out on the train, but with the price hikes, they just couldn’t afford it now because it’s become an overpriced service that’s rapidly getting worse, and yet the government are trying to encourage us to use public transportation.

And some of us are old enough to remember when it was more affordable to catch the train than travel by car, and considering the rate that fuel is currently rising, that’s quite the achievement.

Someone Neglected To Photoshop His Watch!

Critics have accused Boris Johnson of marking an 11 am one-minute silence for the Plymouth shooting victims late after spotting that his wristwatch said the time was 11.14 am.

A picture was posted to the Prime Minister’s official Twitter page which said Boris Johnson observed a minute’s silence at 11 am as a sign of respect for the five people killed by Plymouth shooter Jake Davison last week.

But eagle-eyed social media users were keen to point out that, although the clock in the background said 11 am, Boris Johnson’s wristwatch showed the time was 11.14 am.

The error provoked a surge of critique from social media users with one writing that someone neglected to photoshop his watch or was he going to tell everyone that he likes putting his watch 14 minutes fast.

Journalist Chris Stokel-Walker added that it was incredible and that Boris Johnson’s wristwatch was a dead giveaway that this wasn’t taken at 11 am, despite the clock in the background.

Another added that at 11.14 am, according to his watch, he wound the clock back and paused for this photo op, but a Downing Street official insisted that the Prime Minister’s watch was running fast and that the minute’s silence was held at 11 am.

Writer Tracy King added she would go with the Prime Minister setting his watch forward by 15 minutes to ensure he’s not late for any meetings.

There has been a heartfelt plea for change as hundreds gathered in Plymouth to pay their respects to the five people killed in one of the UK’s worst mass shootings.

Community leaders, spiritual figures, lawmakers, emergency service workers and the military joined about 200 people outside the Guildhall in Plymouth city centre to hold a one minute’s silence.

They gathered to mourn and reflect on last week’s devastating events when gunman Jake Davison, 22, launched his killing spree in the Keyham area of the city.

Jake Davison shot his 51-year-old mother Maxine Davison, also known as Maxine Chapman, at a house in Biddick Drive before he went into the street and shot dead Sophie Martyn, aged three, and her father, Lee Martyn, 43.

In the 12 minute attack, Jake Davison then killed Stephen Washington, 59, in a nearby park before shooting 66-year-old Kate Shepherd, who later died at Derriford Hospital.

In Keyham people gathered in North Down Crescent park, the scene of Friday’s night vigil, to hold their own tribute.

Perhaps Boris Johnson was trying to time travel, or maybe this is just a sign that his time is up.

And don’t forget that this puppet always puts on a show for the masses because to him the whole world is his stage.

All that I can imagine is this man getting up in the morning to quickly scruff up his hair, and he still never gets where he’s going on time – I’m surprised he hasn’t got a mickey mouse watch to go with his hair because both would be equally entertaining, and if this is the best Britain can do in terms of a Prime Minister, I’d hate to imagine what the worst could be!

Perhaps they should have photoshopped Boris out and left the watch.

He stood there attempting to show respect for the dead, but what’s more important is that there were people out there that genuinely did want to show respect, and him standing there wasn’t going to make anyone feel any better because there was a photo of him standing there.

Nando’s Runs Out Of Chicken

Nando’s has had to close a number of its establishments and cancel its delivery options after staffing problems at its supply factories caused significant food deficits.

The popular chicken chain has become the latest restaurant to see its supply chain struck down during the pingdemic after staff shortages.

Nando’s has said it will provide 70 workers to its supplier’s factories to temporarily restore normal levels of food deliveries and reopen its affected establishments.

The company has been notifying customers online that its current shortages have been created by staff isolation periods and suppliers struggling to keep up with demand.

Dissatisfied customers took to social media to bemoan their lack of chicken, as Nando’s said the small number of its 968 establishments that remain closed are set to reopen once deliveries arrive.

The news comes just days after KFC chiefs declared a nationwide supply warning after blaming disruption for causing a lack of availability for some of its menu items.

A Nando’s spokesperson told a newspaper outlet that the UK food industry had been experiencing disruption across its supply chain in recent weeks due to staff shortages and that a number of their establishments had been affected.

However, they could confirm that Nando’s would be lending seventy of their excellent team members to support their key suppliers, working in partnership to help get things rolling again, and that they expect this to have a positive impact on the affected restaurants soon, and that customers should bear with them whilst they do everything they can to get their legendary PERi-PERi chicken back where it belongs – on everyone’s plates!

The restaurant chain uses Avara, Moy Park and 2 Sisters Food Group to supply its stores with chicken.

Nando’s hasn’t yet confirmed the specific items affected by stock deficits, or when the disruption is expected to end.

According to their website, at least 25 restaurants across the United Kingdom are closed as a result of supply chain problems, and pictures taken in the metropolis showed the Clapham Nando’s closed, with a sign posted on its front door to customers saying that they were closed because of stock supply issues affecting trade.

One person shared a snapshot of an attempted order on Deliveroo being cancelled because the Bradford Leisure Exchange restaurant wasn’t taking orders.

Many other customers took to Twitter to complain of restaurant closures and menu modifications, which were blamed on unforeseen circumstances, but for those clucking for Nando’s, you might have to keep abreast of its progress, otherwise, they’ll end up spitting feathers.

But at least Nando’s is helping by fixing the problem and sharing staff, which keeps them busy and at work, and keeps the system going, which was good thinking and encouraged them to move forward, rather than just shutting shop completely.

The Pingdemic Is Finally Over

Sajid Javid called for a careful restoration to normality as the self-isolation rules that sparked the pingdemic were subsequently eased.

And for those who’ve been double jabbed and under 18s will no longer be required to isolate for ten days if they’re pinged by the NHS app or contacted by the Test and Trace service.

It’s one of the biggest moves the country has taken on the road back to normality, and the Health Secretary said the successful vaccine rollout has enabled the Government to relax rules that had forced millions to isolate themselves at home, crushing businesses and schools.

However, Sajid Javid and other health experts proceeded to urge caution, and he said that the British public had played an important role following self-isolation rules during the pandemic, sacrificing so much to help bring the virus under restraint.

He said that the requirement for double jabbed and under 18s who are contacts of people with COVID 19 had been removed as they take another step back towards normality, thanks to the success of the vaccine rollout.

Yesterday, 26,750 coronavirus cases were recorded as well as another 61 deaths within 28 days of a positive test.

It comes as scientists warned that as the double vaccinated can still catch and pass on COVID, relaxation of the rules would unavoidably lead to more infections.

Professor Lawrence Young, of Warwick Medical School, said that it was necessary to understand that the virus was still circulating in the population and that the more infectious Delta variant has altered the equation.

And Dr Peter English, former chairman of the BMA public health medicine committee, said there will now be more infections in under 18s and added that given that they don’t yet completely understand the long term consequences of COVID 19 infection, this was a tremendous gamble.

The NHS app was started in September last year and it tells users if their smartphones have been near someone who has tested positive for COVID, but as lockdowns lifted and the Delta variant spread, the app led to the chaos that was dubbed the pingdemic.

In the week of July 21, a record 689,313 people in England and Wales were told to isolate.

The pingdemic caused such huge staff shortages, leading to empty shop shelves and cancelled trains, that the Government had to exempt key workers from the rules, including those in the food industry and those working on public transport.

There were a lot of people of course, that never got pinged because they didn’t download the app. And is the pandemic really over, or will Sajid Javid just backtrack come October and November with the colder weather coming? Because of course, big government is more dangerous than any virus.

And now because of them, numerous businesses are going down the swanny, along with our GP service that now isn’t available to the public, unless it’s over the telephone – the whole world has gone crazy now.

Hospital waiting lists are so extensive in the waiting time that people will have to wait years for an appointment, which is great for the government because now they’re banking on people going private for their treatment, just so they can convince us that private is the way to go, and way better than the NHS.

But many people voted for the Tories, who then cut public services to the bone, and then those people dared to complain about it, and it seems that common sense has gone out of the window. It went out of the window two years ago, but the biggest problem is we’ve enabled it to happen, with all this mainstream media who are economical with the truth, what hope is there?

Prince Andrew’s Lawyers Could Attempt To Claim Diplomatic Immunity

It’s been claimed that Prince Andrew’s legal team could attempt to get the sex abuse allegations against him by a victim of Jeffrey Epstein thrown out of court by stating he had diplomatic immunity because he was a trade envoy at the time.

Top US lawyer Spencer Kuvin suggested that Prince Andrew’s legal team may claim the Duke of York, who was a trade envoy in 2001, when Virginia Giuffre claimed that he raped and sexually violated her, had immunity in America.

Spencer Kuvin, who represents some of the convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, made the claim as friends of Prince Andrew said the royals were cheerful and relaxed over the bombshell case in the US and would remain silent.

The Duke held the position of special representative for international trade and investment for the United Kingdom for a decade from 2001 until 2011, after taking it up when he left active military service in the Royal Navy.

This means Prince Andrew could be protected under the 1978 Diplomatic Relations Act in the US because he was working for the UK Government in America at the time, and not because he’s a member of the Royal Family.

Meanwhile, Prince Andrew is said to have had no intention of altering course and wasn’t panicking about Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit launched in New York last week. The Duke is currently at Balmoral visiting his mother the Queen with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson.

Spencer Kuvin told a newspaper outlet that Virginia Giuffre’s lawyers have enormous hurdles to defeat to get her lawsuit anywhere near a jury, and if the Duke engages in the case at all, his legal team will unquestionably file a motion to dismiss the complaint on various grounds, and for sure, they would claim diplomatic immunity, and they would have a powerful case.

A friend told a newspaper outlet that his legal team always anticipated this and have prepared, and they advised the Duke to keep calm and carry on and he’s taking their advice, and the legal process could go on for years and that he will respond if required to by law.

I’m sure he’s not sweating it, although he could be petting it!

And he couldn’t have made himself look more guilty if he tried by invoking diplomatic immunity.

What does he have to hide, perhaps we will never know? On the other hand, it might all come out in the wash, but quite frankly he doesn’t have the cojones to face the music, and this wasn’t what diplomatic immunity was intended for, and is this the best his legal team can come up with – how about answering the questions if he’s so innocent?

And in staying silent, he’s making himself look so guilty, and I can wager the two things he isn’t, and that’s calm and cheerful, and of course, good lawyers will always find loopholes, and if Prince Andrew thinks that claiming diplomatic immunity is his get out of jail card, then perhaps he should go down that road because you just know that he will get away with it, and he will just ride the storm.

His lawyers will find any loophole that they can, and rightly so, they’re his lawyers and this is what they’re supposed to do best, but, likely, he won’t appear at very many events now, yet the self-righteous obnoxious man will continue to live a good life even if he has to remain in the background.

Seven-Year-Old Boy Dies After Contracting A Rare Brain-Eating Parasite

A seven-year-old boy has died after contracting a rare, brain-eating waterborne parasite from a lake in California last month.

His aunt Crystal Hayley told CBS News that David Pruitt died from primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, otherwise known as PAM, on July 30 after being hospitalised the same day in his native Tehama County.

The family confirmed David Pruitt’s passing on August 7, and they said that they were sad and broken-hearted to report that their sweet David had passed on, which the family wrote on GoFundMe.

They said that he’s now in the loving arms of our Lord and family members who have passed before him and that they were now rejoicing in knowing he was no longer in pain and in the best of care.

According to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, the parasite in question, called Naegleria Fowleri, is typically contracted once contaminated water enters the body through the nose.

The dangerous amoeba is usually found in temperate fresh bodied waters such as rivers or lakes, however, several cases have been reported while swimming in poorly treated pools.

It said, that once the amoeba penetrates the nose, it travels to the brain where it causes PAM, which is normally fatal.

The CDC reported that those who contract the parasite initially experience severe headaches, nausea and vomiting. Those who have contracted it have also reported a stiff neck and even hallucinations and seizures as the infection becomes worse.

Crystal Hayley added that the family wants people to be aware of this amoeba and the illness symptoms.

David Pruitt’s death came almost a year after a six-year-old Texas boy, Josiah McIntyre, died in September 2020 after getting the same strain of parasite at either the Lake Jackson splash pad or a hose at his family’s home.

Three samples of contaminated water taken from the Lake Jackson splash pad were examined by the CDC two weeks after Josiah McIntyre’s death, and all three ultimately tested positive for the harmful bacteria.

At a benefit, days after Josiah McIntyre’s sad passing, his mother recounted the life her boy lived, and Maria Castillo told CNN at the time that he was an energetic little boy, and that he was a really good big brother – he just loved and cared about a lot of people.

So, it seems now that it’s not safe for children to go into the water. Even if the probabilities are minuscule that your child could get infected, that wouldn’t be much comfort if your child has the bad luck to get it – you just don’t know what’s lurking, and there are all kinds of nastiness proliferating in them.

All rivers and lakes are infected by a variety of parasites, and it would be great if we saw more information about preventing this, particularly if there’s no effective treatment once a person is contaminated.

And it’s a huge problem when water warms enough to grow bacteria, particularly in the hot weather.

More Than One Is Not Amused!

Visitors at Buckingham Palace Gardens took to TripAdvisor with poor reviews about their experience, calling the Queen’s official residence a money-making machine.

Ticket sales for the opportunity to enjoy a picnic at the palace has had to be suspended when they were first issued due to overwhelming demand.

However, visitors have warned other guests away from the attraction after discovering large parts of the gardens were out of bounds.

The palace website promised visitants the opportunity to soak up the charm and calm of this walled sanctuary on a self-guided tour, and according to a newspaper outlet visitors would then be able to enjoy a once in a lifetime chance to picnic on the lawn.

This summer the 39 acre gardens were opened for self-guided tours and picnics for the first time after admission into the palace exhibitions was discontinued last year.

The gardens include a 511-foot herbaceous border and plane trees planted by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert.

Tickets went on sale in April at £16.50 for an adult or £42 for a family with up to three children, but guests were left unhappy with their experience, citing oppressive security guards, a prohibition on prosecco, overpriced food and rip off shop tat as a reason not to go.

One visitor called it a money-making machine, while another added they felt cheated by the royals.

Many also criticised the size of the area in the gardens, which opened in July, that was open for the public to access, and many were surprised that areas, including the rose garden and wildflower meadow, were off-limits without spending an additional £6.50 per person for a guided tour, which needed to be booked in advance.

Review sites have been inundated with comments criticising them as bitterly disappointing and poor value for money, and one disgruntled patron wrote on TripAdvisor that people should beware of this total rip off and that they paid £16.50 for entrance to the gardens, expecting to laze around and to see gorgeous flowers and trees.

What they encountered was first a lengthy queue to security checks, and then a piece of lawn enveloped by standing stewards scrutinising your every move and ropes segregating the rest of the garden.

And that the small portion of the park that people could enter was easily walkable in around ten minutes and nothing was interesting to see there.

People couldn’t even sit on the lake’s bank to view the wildlife because of the ropes everywhere, and people felt extremely frustrated and cheated by the royals, but then haven’t the royals cheated us since their existence?

And let’s face it, the entire Royal Family are a money-making machine.

Of course, Buckingham Palace isn’t owned by the Queen, it’s own by the Crown Estates, and the sovereign isn’t involved with the management or administration of the estate, and exercises only very limited control of its operations.

Of course, it’s a money-making machine – even if you were to go to Paris or Rome, it’s the same. Go, or don’t go, it’s an individual choice, and there are numerous beautiful gardens and lawns to see that are free, so what’s the appeal when it comes to Buckingham Palace?

And of course, the view across London alone is worth a visit to the top of Greenwich Park.

The Royal Family are my least favourite people, so I clearly wouldn’t want to be going to Buckingham Palace, especially to see their gardens and flowers, but there are still lots of people who are extremely devoted where the Royals are concerned, and that’s great, each to their own if they want to waste their money, that’s up to them.

Generous Landlord Praised Online

A landlord has been hailed online after selling his home and sharing the proceeds with his former tenants who helped to clear his mortgage.

Chris Robarge, from Massachusetts, revealed on Facebook he had got a note and a $2,500 (£1,800) cheque out of the blue from a former landlord, whose name he didn’t share.

In the heartfelt note, the unnamed landlord said he’d been happy to share his home with Chris and explained how he’d calculated the cheque’s total, and he said that he’d calculated the amount of principal he paid each month he lived there, split it by who was living in the house at the time and added 40 per cent, the increase in value of the home from when he purchased it.

Other social media users were left overcome by the post, with several saying it had left them in a torrent of tears.

Sharing a snap of the note online, Chris wrote that a person he had previously rented from asked him for his current address recently, and that this person had rented him a space in their house that was the first place he could call home when he had to leave his house after he got divorced.

He said that he paid a completely reasonable sum of money for his accommodations and enjoyed his time there, and like all rental situations, he thought that was that.

He said he’d got the note in the mail, adding that it was a letter from that person, notifying him that they’d sold their house and that they were paying him and every tenant they ever had for what they contributed to the profit they made from selling the house.

The letter read, that while it wasn’t much, it was his, and that it was a great house and that they were glad they were able to share it with him, and he said that he’d been sitting with this for more than a day and was still totally beyond an actual way to express what the act meant to him.

And that all he could say was that there are people who talk about their values and there are people who live them, and the reason he wanted to share was that he wanted to encourage people to live their values, and he said that the simple act of kindness had inspired his own, adding he would give away the $2,000 to worthy causes and people in need.

Of course, it was the person’s money to do with as he wanted, and it’s not often that you get anything back from a landlord, which was incredibly considerate, and hopefully, they all said thank you.

I do love stories like this because it really does restore one’s faith in humanity, and there’s always one kind of person that sits above the crowd, and this landlord is one of them, but I’m guessing these were extremely respectful renters.

It’s not often that a landlord will find good tenants, and if you do find a set of good tenants, then you should look after them and treat them like gold dust, and had there been more people like this person, we might have lived in a far happier and more gracious society.

Although I’m sure some will read this and have some pretty cruel and negative comments going through their minds, they might even express them, but it’s just nice that someone is given a break from time to time.

We Were Treated Like Slaves!

In 1946, Laurie Humphreys, a 13-year-old boy living in an orphanage in Southampton, we sent to a ‘better life’ in Australia under the Child Migrants Programme, along with hundreds of other children.

In numerous cases, they were taught only farm work and experienced brutality and hardship, including physical, psychological and sexual perversion.

Gordon Brown did make a belated apology to the former child migrants, but none of them was ever given a facial apology.

Laurie Humphreys mother died when he was four and his father, on the recommendation of a priest, put Laurie into an orphanage in Southampton.

He was evacuated to Wiltshire during World War II and, in 1946, he was transferred to another orphanage in Romsey, just outside Southampton. He said that one day, a nun gathered the boys together and asked who wanted to go to Australia?

He said that pretty much all of the boys said yes, even though they didn’t even know where Australia was.

Shortly afterwards, a Christian Brother came and talked to them about this faraway land where the sun shone 14 hours a day and where they’d be able to ride on horses to school.

He called it ‘the land of milk and honey’, and he was a 13-year-old boy and it sounded like paradise.

He was chosen to go, along with a couple of other boys, and they were given a new set of clothes.

They set sail from Southampton on the SS Asturias on 19 August 1947 and they reached Fremantle, Australia, on 22 September.

They arrived ready for their new life, and they were listed as war orphans, and he was given to understand that his father was dead.

He said that about 20 of them were taken to Boys Town, a home for children in Bindoon, about 60 miles away.

He said it was quite a shock because it was such a barren place in contrast to the green fields of England and there were barely any roads, and they were quickly put to work, and he said that he learnt how to milk a cow inside a week, and then they started building a new building and that by the time he was 14 years old, he was driving a truck – that they would work, sleep, that was it.

He said that there wasn’t much in the way of schooling and that he’d always been good at school in England, but that pretty much ended overnight, and a lot of boys at Bindoon never learnt how to read or write, and that they slept on open verandas all year round, and even when a wind blew up, it got pretty cold.

Foodwise, they got crushed wheat or porridge for breakfast, followed by bread in dripping. The rest of the meals were similarly plain, and they seemed to live on a menu of swedes and turnips.

And then there was the abuse. The Christian Brothers used to walk about with a thick 18-inch leather strap dangling from the waistband of their long, black outfits, and they’d give you a wallop at the slightest opportunity.

They would hit you wherever they could, be it on the backside or the bottoms of your feet, and it hurt and you would be left covered in bruises, and like most of the boys, they would try to keep clear of Father Eugene, he was the creepy Catholic priest in charge of the place, and he had an ominous way of talking to the boys, and he took a keen enthusiasm in whether the boys kept their private parts clean, which wasn’t exactly fitting for the person who was hearing their confessions.

Being one of the older boys, he managed to steer clear of the sexual abuse, but all the boys were aware that it went on.

He said that perhaps the most despised figure at the institution was Brother Kearney, a large Irishman who appeared in 1948 to teach them a trade, but he liked to prod them with a walking stick and was one of the most brutal people he ever met.

He could turn on the charm when dealing with government officials and was even given an MBE, and when he died, a statue was put up of him at Boys Town, and one night it was beheaded, which shows how much he was hated.

At 17 years old Laurie Humphreys had to leave. He’d spent 13 years in different institutions, three of them in Australia.

He worked hard to build a new life for himself Down Under. He worked on farms for a few years before getting a job driving long-distance oil tankers, which he did for the next 25 years.

Years later, to his shock, he discovered that his father wasn’t dead when he was sent to Australia and that he’d been lied to, and while he never got to meet him, he died in 1976, he learnt that he had family back in England.

So in 1984, almost 40 years after arriving in Australia, he returned home to hunt down his long lost relatives and found two brothers and three sisters. What’s more, he discovered that his father had remarried and had another seven children, so far from being an orphan, it turned out he was part of a huge family.

He said that he made a pretty good life for himself in Australia, and that he’s got family there, but that a lot of child migrants never settled, and still bear the scars of their early experiences.

Indeed, when he organised a get together for child migrants, one of the girls came up to him and asked what they were celebrating, and he answered ‘surviving.’ And whilst he never really considered returning to live in the United Kingdom, he’d been back a dozen or more times.

He said that perhaps the biggest wrench for him about being a child migrant was being taken away from his British family and everything that he missed out on, and apology or no apology from the Australian government, that was something that would never go away.

These child migrants did a magnificent job for Australia to the detriment of their own well being, and Australia and the Roman Catholic church should now compensate them all for the hardship and sexual abuse they suffered.

And there are a lot of people that have no idea that this perversion happened. These were the lost children – they were sent away and simply forgotten about, but the British government at the time sanctioned it and the Australian government took them into their country as free child labour, and it’s a disgrace, and the church’s culpability in this is, as usual, was shocking because it all happened in their own backyard.

Australia should bow their heads down in shame. This was a horrendous account of abuse and racism because just because it was whites exploiting whites, it doesn’t mean it wasn’t racist, and this reflects so terribly on a society that likes to portray itself as egalitarian.

Many parents had children that were shipped to Australia on the premise that either they were not wanted or their parents had died, and they never saw their children again and these parents suffered a lifetime of psychological pain, and so did these children who were told their parents were dead, and the Catholic Church played a somewhat inglorious part, although governments were the principal offender.

No amount of compensation will account for the loss of humanity or even forgiveness, and this chapter belongs to the history of the Cajuns or Arcadian’s, slavery, the Dutch Boer Concentration camps or even the work programme of the Nazi’s or Stalinists.

This should blacken Australia’s reputation, but British governments carry equal accountability for this criminal programme which treated disadvantaged children like cattle.

It shouldn’t matter that many of these children went on to make a good life there because the years that they lost needs to be addressed. After all, these children were from a stolen generation that governments stole for slave labour and abuse of the very worst kind.

Making Children Wear Masks In The Classroom Is Child Abuse

A health report approved by the Irish government has determined that making children wear masks in the classroom can stunt language abilities and heighten anxiety.

The Health Information and Quality Authority’s paper published in March apprised Dublin’s decision not to mandate masks for children in elementary schools.

The HIQA paper recorded that delivery of COVID was low in schools and that young children found it challenging to wear face coverings correctly.

The scientists also gave evidence that masks had adverse psychological impacts, including causing distress and hindering the growth of language abilities.

Tucker Carlson drew attention to the report on his Fox News program, calling it child abuse to force young children to wear moist paper burkas, and he said, the question was, what was the advantage of doing it?

Tucker Carlson said that the Irish government looked into it and concluded there was no benefit, and that children in Ireland were not getting ill from COVID, and they weren’t transmitting COVID either.

And, in the end, based on the scientific study using the disappearing art of intelligent decision making, the Irish government refused to implement mask mandates in school.

The report determined that since the pandemic began the extent of transmission between children or onwards to households by children, had been low.

It said that while masks for adults were associated with lower transmission of COVID 19, the data revealed a decline in mask effectiveness amongst children, which may, in part, be due to diminished capacity to comply with face mask-wearing.

Furthermore, the paper went onto add that there was a concern about the possible harms associated with face mask use, for instance, anxiety or adverse impacts on the development of communication and language skills, especially for younger children.

In Britain, school children below the age of 12 had never been expected to wear masks throughout the pandemic, neither at school nor anywhere else.

Public Health England’s medical adviser Dr Susan Hopkins said in March that the consensus opinion was to not encourage schoolchildren at primary school age, 12 and under to wear face coverings, and that was for two reasons, firstly they could have difficulty wearing them and keeping them all day, and the second part of that was that it was important they could see facial expressions, to strengthen their communication and language skills.

To be fair, it’s outrageous to even think of asking children to wear a mask, and it seems that sadly, people at the top pushing these vaccines and masks care nothing about our children, and it’s been destroying schools, and it’s dumbed everything down exponentially.

And with masking, children aren’t learning the very important non-verbal facial cues needed for good communication.

Can you imagine going to school and not even knowing what your teacher looks like because they always have a mask on? And don’t get me started on the hazardous germs that aren’t COVID that are on their masks.

Students should be able to see their teachers face and have a closer to normal school year, and for everyone reading who appears to be defending putting a mask on a young child, despite actual science and a medical study indicating strongly that not only is it unnecessary, but it’s also bad psychologically, and physically, when did it become okay to harm a child in order to protect adults?

This has nothing to do with our children’s health – it’s all a circus to show people that we have little control over the lives of our children, and this has been going on for some time now!

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started