John Lewis Boss Says The Firm Has To Give New Staff Basic Literacy And Numeracy Classes

The boss of John Lewis has announced the firm is having to give basic literacy and numeracy classes to young staff because they’ve been failed by the education system.

In a stinging critique of the UK’s education set-up, Dame Sharon White said some of the 16-year-olds it hired didn’t have functional literacy and numeracy skills.

She also warned that children who are less academically inclined are not always able to reach their full potential.

Dame Sharon White said that to have done ten years, 11, 12 years of education, and not having, in many instances, functional literacy, certainly, pretty typically not having functional numeracy exceeding the age of, say, ten, 11, means that they may then have wonderful people skills and fabulous skills in terms of operating in a team but that’s almost without the education system.

Dame Sharon White, a former Ofcom chief who’s been the chair of the John Lewis Partnership since July 2019, made the remarks while talking to the Times Education Commission.

The commission is examining the future of education in light of the COVID 19 crisis.

It will also look at the deterioration in social mobility, as well as how technology can further improve education for children in the United Kingdom.

Former Labour Prime Minister, Tony Blair, as well as children’s laureate, Cressida Cowell, and director of the National Theatre, Rufus Norris, are amongst those giving evidence to the committee.

The year-long commission is set to produce the final report in June 2022.

In the meantime, the exam board, Pearson, is currently operating consultation on the exam system.

Called The Future of Assessment, it’s exploring what format qualifications between the ages of 16 and 18 might take in the future, and how effective the system is at supporting young people.

Recent research from the consultation found four out of five employers in the United Kingdom that said qualifications didn’t give young people the skills they required for employment.

Rod Bristow, president of Pearson UK, called for employers to be more involved in education policy.

He told a newspaper outlet that it wasn’t necessarily about creating another exam to test as to whether they had the skills, but it was necessary they knew they had the experience where learning could occur.

Dame Sharon’s comments came after it was announced earlier in the month that John Lewis’s 5,000 office-based staff would work from home three days a week.

The old school system didn’t appear to work either because children that were a little slower than others got left by the wayside. After all, teachers were more interested in those that excelled in their studies, than those that didn’t because it was just less effort to teach them.

After Margaret Thatcher revolutionised the education policy, businesses helped to develop the curriculum to prepare teenagers for work, but that was then all changed, and now they’re all thoroughly brainwashed into wokery and gender equality matters – who needs reading, writing and arithmetic when you have all that?

Standards, morals and discipline have all gradually diminished over the preceding 70 years or so, and the root cause of this is multiculturalism and it starts with the education of our children in school.

Our education system has gradually been degraded over the last seven decades. Adjusting and weakening our national curricula and dumbing down to suit the needs of the lowest common denominators in our society.

It’s time to improve our Great British education system and to treat these kids how they should be treated and to educate them properly, giving complete power back to the teachers and schoolmasters to act with impunity.

Face Masks Forever!

A leaked document gave a glimpse of the UK’s possible new normal with face masks, working from home and travel quarantine rules set to stay beyond July 19.

The Whitehall paper suggests that the government will stop short of urging workers to return to offices even after Freedom Day eventually arrives.

There’s also a suggestion that face masks will be required in some settings long term, as well as keeping post-travel isolation rules.

Anyone who has coronavirus symptoms will still be required to quarantine, according to the draft proposals, and concerns have been raised that more constraints will be needed if the disease surges again in the winter.

The document, seen by Politico, emerged as infuriated Tories predicted up to 70 MPs could inflict a bloody nose on Boris Johnson in a crunch lockdown vote.

The Prime Minister is facing a bruising mutiny from his benches as the Commons was asked to approve the delay of Freedom Day until July 19.

Victory is guaranteed for the government as Labour has thrown its backing behind the extension of the harsh restrictions.

The shift from Boris Johnson, amid warnings from scientists that the Indian variant will cause thousands of more deaths, has angered numerous Conservatives who claim that vaccines have protected the most vulnerable and the country must learn to live with the virus.

The Cabinet Office insisted no decisions had been taken on the guidance after July 19, which Boris Johnson has pledged will represent a terminus point for lockdown, and the premier said that the delay would save thousands of lives and enable millions more to get their first and second jabs.

But he insisted he’s confident he’ll finally be able to end restrictions on July 19, describing it as a terminus point, while declining to give a definite guarantee.

Jacob Rees-Mogg hinted at a growing division in Cabinet by suggesting it was wrong to keep restrictions in place once all vulnerable people and over 50s had been given their second jabs, a point which has already been established.

He said people below that age were not at particular risk, adding that overwhelmingly the most important thing was the number of deaths and that people going into hospital for a couple of days and coming out was not particularly important.

In an interview with the Conservative Home website, he added that ultimately, the NHS was there to serve the British people, not the British people there to serve the NHS, and hence they might need to spend more money on hospitals, and that you couldn’t run society just to stop the hospitals being full, otherwise they’d never let people get into their cars and drive anywhere or do any of the other things that people want to do, so that had to be some proportionality.

But once the government build the 40 new hospitals and recruit the 50,000 additional nurses that they promised in the 2019 manifesto, the NHS might not be under so much pressure again – the Tories just have to meet their election promises, but then when was the last time any of these parties fulfilled even half of their election promises?

But isn’t this just about scare tactics because Boris Johnson failed to build the hospitals and recruit the nurses required for an overpopulated country, but despite all the broken promises, the sheep keep voting for them – will they never learn?

Perhaps we should prepare for chaos? Because the government has just moved to the next phase, which means, they plan for you to lose all confidence, they intend for the culling of fools and they plan for chaos, and from all that chaos they hope that their new order will be demanded, and the society they wish to give is a vision of hell, and the society that they’re removing was at best tolerable.

NHS Worker Refuses To Apologise

An NHS worker who was spared prison after using a dead COVID patient’s bank card to purchase crisps, sweets and fizzy beverages from a hospital vending machine has refused to apologise.

Healthcare assistant Ayesha Basharat, 23, used the 83-year-old woman’s card only 17 minutes after she died at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital on January 24.

She used the contactless touchpad on a vending machine in the hospital to make six £1 purchases.

Police said that she made another £1 purchase that evening before attempting to use the card again when she next returned to work four days later, by which time, the card had been cancelled.

Ayesha Basharat, from Farm Road, Birmingham initially insisted she found it on the floor and got it mixed up with her card when paying.

She admitted theft and fraud by false representation at Birmingham Crown Court on Wednesday, June 9 and was handed down two five-month jail terms to run concurrently, both suspended for 18 months.

According to reports, Ayesha Basharat refused to apologise to the pensioner’s family when confronted at her home in Sparkhill.

She reportedly said that she didn’t want to talk about it and that she had nothing to say, while stood on the doorstep with her father and elder brother by her side.

She didn’t answer when she was asked why she had used the bank card and refused to respond when asked if she was upset at the possibility of losing her job.

The University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, which runs Heartlands Hospital, said Ayesha Basharat was suspended from her position when they were made aware of the incident. An internal inquiry has also been launched.

A spokesperson for the trust said that Ayesha Basharat was quickly suspended when this incident came to light and all measures were taken to support the patient’s family.

The spokesperson said that the trust had fully supported the police with their inquiry, which concluded in Ayesha Basharat’s conviction, and the trust would now continue with their internal HR processes, with due attention given to the criminal conviction that Ms Basharat had received.

The spokesperson said that they would like to extend their condolences to the patient’s family and truly apologise for their experience – that the incident was shameful and fell short of the high standards of integrity that they all expect of NHS workers.

This destroyed Mr Basharat’s career and reputation for £7, which is utterly crazy, and a suspended sentence – looks like crime pays, but obviously, this woman has no morals, and it’s despicable.

Ms Basharat should never be permitted to work again as a nurse because she’s not deserving of the uniform, and she held a position of trust where people are at their most vulnerable, and nothing less than sacking is acceptable, but the NHS has to go through a process, and you’d have to be a very particular kind of person to use a dead person’s bank card.

And it’s the arrogance about this woman, making out as though she was the wounded party, and yet we were all clapping for them a few months ago like they were all saints, and what was going on in her head at the time, well who knows, but there are countless self-indulgent and selfish people in society today, but most ordinary folk would never dream of doing this, and the fact that she used contactless payment on a dead person’s card to save a few pounds beggars belief.

A Pregnant Woman Who Throws Up Multiple Times A Day

A pregnant woman who throws up many times a day due to morning sickness has revealed how her neighbour threatened to report her loud puking to management, before asking her to run water or play music to neutralise the noise.

Posting anonymously on Reddit, the woman, who lives in an apartment building thought to be in America, told how her resident wanted to make a formal complaint about her vomiting.

Writing on the Am I Being an Asshole thread, the mother to be explained that on some days she throws up multiple times a day, adding that the walls in her apartment are so thin she can sometimes hear the next-door neighbours conversations, and it wasn’t long before startled forum users took to the comments section to condemn the neighbour for being so indifferent.

The neighbour is going to talk to the management, what does she think will come of that? What does the neighbour want her to work a vomiting schedule, or does she think that management might know a way of getting rid of her morning sickness?

In the initial post, the woman in question explained that her neighbour tapped on her door and said she could hear her loud puking all the time and that she has a gag reflex when she hears people throwing up, and she said that she’d almost thrown up after hearing her.

The woman added that the resident demanded she turn on her bathroom fan, plays music or runs water before she was sick.

She continued that she’s in her first trimester and hasn’t even told her family that she’s pregnant yet, so she didn’t want to share with her neighbour, but that it seemed as if she was implying that she was intentionally making herself puke, so she felt like she had to explain.

She told her neighbour that she was sorry to have disturbed her, that she had morning sickness and would attempt to turn her fan on before she got sick.

She also told her neighbour that her vomiting could come on suddenly, so no guarantees, but her neighbour didn’t appear satisfied with this, but said okay and left.

The mother-to-be went on to say she’d been trying to keep the noise down and turning her fan on, but added it had been stressful, and despite her best efforts, the neighbour was still unsatisfied and complained once again.

Imagine how miserable she’ll be with a newborn that cries all day and night and then a toddler who stomps about because vomiting noises are nothing compared to that, but sadly, when you move into an apartment, you really do have to cope with the sounds that are around you, and if you don’t want the noise, don’t move into an apartment.

And perhaps the complaining woman should just hang out with the pregnant lady in her bathroom so she can do her gag reflex as well. It’s not the poor woman is really responsible for throwing up, and it’s not like somehow a person can extinguish an autonomous reflex in some way.

And really, it’s just criminal to build apartments that allow you to hear a conversation – this is not satisfactory housing and the building management along with the builders should be held accountable.

This is a lack of compassion and whether a person has experienced morning sickness or not, that person should have some empathy for the person that is going through this temporarily, which is a pretty tough time during pregnancy – sometimes it’s just nice to hold your tongue, which this neighbour couldn’t do, and likes to hear the sound of her voice above the puking.

The Army Must Help Get Food To Shops

A driver deficit has triggered calls for the Army to be on standby to deliver food to convenience stores, pubs, eateries and care homes.

The Federation of Wholesale Distributors (FWD) said that the situation had reached crisis point, leading to empty racks and a prospect of empty plates, and local convenience stores have now resorted to putting up signs informing customers of shortages due to the lack of delivery drivers.

Pubs and restaurant chains are also not getting the fresh produce deliveries they expect, and supplies of beer, milk and other chilled products are being hit, while there are concerns the situation might hit tanker deliveries of fuel to petrol stations.

James Bielby, chief executive of the FWD, said there’s an estimated 70,000 shortfall in HGV drivers.

The Road Haulage Association said the crisis has been triggered by a combination of Brexit, which has led to a cut in European truckers, and COVID, which has seen no new HGV drivers trained for a year.

James Bielby said that the situation had reached a crisis point and it’s expected to get more serious as more hospitality venues open and demand increases and that the Government needs to act pretty swiftly.

He said that they were concerned enough to suggest that the Government considers having Army trucks on standby to ensure there are enough vehicles and drivers to distribute food.

James Bielby added that with the estimated 70,000 shortall in HGV drivers, some wholesalers have had to restrict the number of deliveries they make to convenience stores which has led to some availability problems.

He said product manufacturers who supply into the wholesale channel have had similar problems with drivers, and their members reporting particular problems, getting soft drinks, beer, and chilled products like cream, cheese, yoghurt and meats.

The government lengthened the hours that professional delivery drivers are permitted behind the wheel during the pandemic, however, this ended recently, and the FWD urged the Government to reinstate this and make Army drivers ready to deliver to vulnerable communities.

A sign erected in the window of a Budgens store at Greater Blakenham, near Ipswich, in Suffolk, read that due to a national deficit of delivery drivers they were experiencing cancellations in deliveries resulting in low stock around the store.

Dairy giant Arla said that this is a real crisis this Summer because of COVID creating an accumulation of new drivers passing their tests, changes to tax rules, some drivers from the EU countries returning home, some others on furlough and other factors, and that like many others in the industry, they were seeing costs going up, and they were working hard to restrict the impact that this would have on prices.

So, do people need to go out and panic buy and stock up on toilet rolls again? Because soon we will see the military on our streets slowly being increased, and things can only get worse.

And this is Boris Johnson’s Brexit, the gift that keeps giving, and even though he can’t control the basics now, like whether essential goods turn up in the shops, at least they’ve taken back control.

And there’s no surprise that there’s a deficit of lorry drivers because in truth it’s a dog’s life with tremendous responsibility, which messes up the persons home and social life, and the general public don’t even pause to consider how stocks get to the stores or the effort the drivers have to make to get them there.

Banned Aid!

It raised £17 million for famine relief and kick-started a global charity machine that created tens, if not hundreds, of millions of pounds more, but the hit single ‘Do They Know It’s Christmas?’ might not have been recorded today because of its colonist overtones, said one of the stars involved.

Actor Nigel Planner was at the recording of the 1984 Band-Aid No 1 in character as Neil, the depressed hippie he played on the BBC comedy The Young Ones, but he said that even though the song was made with really good intentions, he believes the concept wouldn’t stand up to today’s more woke standards.

He said that now it would be investigated and that the tone, the colonist tone of the event, would now come under some scrutiny.

The comedian, who began a degree in African and Asian studies at Sussex University before dropping out to pursue an acting career, said that on the day of the recording he chickened out at the last minute and declined to appear on the single or its video.

He told Richard Herring’s Leicester Square Theatre Podcast that his comedy alter ego would have jarred with the serious message of the day, giving a feeling of: ‘That was fun, wasn’t it? Now let’s look at some poor children with flies on their eyes.’

But he did record a separate sketch that was used in the fundraising effort.

Highlighting stars such as George Michael, Banarama, Bono and Boy George, Do They Know It’s Christmas became the biggest selling UK single of all time, and it’s been re-released three times and the subsequent Live Aid concert raised an extraordinary £40 million.

Bob Geldof, who was later knighted for his charity work, and teamed up with Midge Ure to create the track after seeing disturbing BBC broadcasts of the escalating crisis in Ethiopia.

But this isn’t the first time it’s been criticised for its Western viewpoint, especially the line, ‘Well tonight thank God it’s them instead of you,’ which was dropped from the 2014 remake.

At that time, Robtel Neajai Pailey, a Liberian born academic at the London School of Oriental and African Studies, described the lyrics condescending and said the track reeked of the white saviour complex.

Midge Ure admitted the song’s shortcomings but said it was all about creating money, but in his more direct way, Bob Geldof said that anyone criticising the lyrics could, well, get stuffed.

The song raised millions instantly and made some difference, but now there would be three years of meetings, focus groups, allergy testing, mental health assessments, inclusivity questionnaires, gender inclusion support groups, and then at the last minute it would all be called off due to the environmental impact.

And now there’s always someone that will take offence, no matter what the topic, you really can’t win anymore, and forty years on, and all that effort, all that money, what exactly has it all achieved?

All it really did was give publicity to some virtue signalling celebrities, and as for people saying that it was offensive, if you choose to be offended then that’s that person’s problem because one man’s pleasure is another man’s poison.

And Bob Geldof was aware of the problem at the time and tried to stop the white saviour photos from happening, but he couldn’t control people swarming him wherever he went, and he couldn’t control every picture taken, and he just couldn’t watch children perish and do nothing about it, and Bob Geldof is a long way off from being a bourgeois English colonial – he’s just a spitting, snarling Irish guy saying it to your face.

Boris Johnson Says Anybody Sensible Would Keep An Open Mind

Boris Johnson said anybody sensible would keep an open mind about the source of the coronavirus outbreak but the United Kingdom doesn’t currently believe the so-called laboratory leak theory.

Boris Johnson told a press conference at the end of the G7 summit in Cornwall that at the moment, the advice they have had is that it doesn’t look as though this particular disease of zoonotic origin came from a laboratory and that anybody sensible would want to keep an open mind about that.

His comments came after Dominic Raab mimicked a comparable opinion over the suggestion that COVID 19 may have emerged from a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan.

The Foreign Secretary said on the balance of probabilities Britain is of the view that the virus didn’t start in a laboratory.

He said the Government believes it’s much more likely that coronavirus shifted from animals to humans, but he said officials at the G7 summit have been comparing notes on the subject and the world doesn’t yet have all of the answers about how the pandemic started.

The head of the World Health Organisation, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said the possibility that the pandemic was triggered by a laboratory leak was established at the G7 and they talked about the origins.

A WHO inquiry into the source of the pandemic hasn’t ruled out any theory behind the outbreak, and a team of experts from the WHO and China said in February that the virus was extremely unlikely to have entered the human population as a consequence of a laboratory related incident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

But the WHO has said all hypotheses remain on the table and want to carry out the second stage of its work, while US President Joe Biden has requested an inquiry into the origins, including the leak theory.

Asked if he’d been involved in G7 discussions about the laboratory leak theory, Dominic Raab told Sky News that he hadn’t personally but of course it’s created part of the backdrop and officials have been comparing notes on this and that if they were questioning him whether they believed on the balance of probabilities, that it started in a laboratory, their best information, for now, was that it didn’t.

But he said that they didn’t have all of the answers, that was why internationally they wanted the review to be able to go into to get all of the answers, to have all the cooperation, so they have a complete understanding rather than those potential, possible, plausible possibilities.

But laboratory leak or not, China is guilty of playing with nature and hasn’t even the courage to apologise to the rest of the world and to add insult to injury, we even import some masks produced in China.

At the end of the day, we don’t need to prove it came from a laboratory, China needs to prove it didn’t because their secrecy and behaviour during the initial stages of the outbreak seem to be the most incriminating evidence.

And if China had evidence that COVID 19 jumped from animals to humans they would be yelling it from the rooftops. The fact that there’s not one piece of proof of this speaks volumes, and let’s face it, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like a duck, swims like a duck, looks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Pregnant Nursery Worker Gets £40,000

A pregnant nursery worker has won almost £40,000 after her boss repeatedly declined to let her attend hospital appointments and fired her over a series of trumped-up allegations.

Simone Cousins, 29, was accused of falsifying wages by Maria Noble at Dovecote Nursery, Northampton, without a shred of evidence in what a judge said was an oppressive and high handed campaign against her.

The employment tribunal, held virtually in Norwich, Norfolk, ruled Simone Cousins was made redundant because she was pregnant and awarded her £39,535 in damages for discrimination, harassment, and unfair dismissal.

Maria Noble unreasonably denied Simone Cousins request for days off for hospital appointments and forced her to change them to accommodate the nursery’s schedule.

A tribunal heard that Simone Cousins was pressured into working her normal hours despite suffering exhaustion and nausea and was summoned out of the blue to a disciplinary hearing on baseless allegations.

In one case Maria Noble even emailed Simone Cousins 90 questions at 5 pm and demanded a written explanation for them by 10 am the next morning.

The employment tribunal heard Simone Cousins, who worked at the nursery for two years, had a good rapport with Maria Noble before she was pregnant, but when pregnant, Simone Cousins asked for time off for five appointments. One was given, but others were refused or Maria Noble forced her to reschedule them up to three times, causing problems.

The tribunal found that no attempt was made by Maria Noble to provide cover, and without warning, Simone Cousins was called to a formal meeting where she was accused of claiming wages she didn’t work though no proof was offered.

She later got a letter referring to large differences which claimed there was a difference of 58.5 hours.

Weeks later, out of the blue, she was summoned to another meeting in which she was told she could be dismissed for gross misconduct, this time it was alleged that she claimed 95 hours she didn’t work.

The hours were subtracted from her salary and Simone Cousins answered 90 questions despite struggling to sit at a computer for a prolonged time.

The 95 hours were repaid but, bizarrely, she was fired for gross misconduct because she falsified those hours and failed to use the sign-in book.

A tribunal ruled that Maria Noble failed to listen to Simone Cousins answers and could have seen that she wasn’t lying about the hours worked if she bothered to review the work log.

Judge Robin Postle said Maria Noble had made entirely baseless allegations, and that Maria Noble simply didn’t look at the evidence that was staring her in the face.

The employment judge said the allegations were patently false and that Simone Cousins was being questioned about stuff that could quickly have been answered by the nursery from their records.

Judge Postle added that Maria Noble had maintained Simone Cousins was a trustworthy and honest worker, one of the best, and meticulous with her paperwork.

He said that however, following the announcement of Simone Cousins pregnancy she was accused of falsifying earnings without any proof to substantiate this claim and was then deducted 95 hours without notification or reason.

Then, when she complained about it, the hours and money were consequently returned without any reason, and that this was harsh and high handed.

The judge continued that the tribunal did acknowledge that Simone Cousins was failing to sign in on occasions but this was mostly following her pregnancy when she forgot or was distracted by parents when entering the building.

And he said that other workers had failed to do so and yet no disciplinary penalties had been imposed.

Lifetime’s Megxit Film Recreates Princess Diana’s Deadly Paris Car Crash

One of Prince Harry’s most disturbing memories is set to be dredged up and replayed in a new Lifetime movie about his and Meghan’s departure from the palace after the cast and crew were seen executing a recreation of the fatal Paris car crash that claimed the life of his mother Princess Diana.

Photographs taken on set in Vancouver show staff from the film, Harry & Meghan: Escaping the Palace, setting up the horrifying moment that Diana’s chauffeur lost control of his Mercedes-Benz and crashed it into the wall of a tunnel in France, before paparazzi shutterbugs started snapping pictures of the devastating scene on August 31, 1997.

In the photos, a vintage black Mercedes, quite similar to the vehicle that was carrying the mother of two and her partner, Egyptian film producer Dodi Fayed, can be seen flipped over onto its roof with its front end destroyed, while men playing the role of photographers crowd around it with large cameras aimed at the wreck.

The scene is eerily similar to the shocking photographs taken only moments after Princess Diana’s vehicle smashed in the Alma tunnel in Paris, which were immediately distributed around the globe. However, it seems that the Lifetime producers have taken steps to make the horrific crash all the more climactic, flipping the vehicle over onto its roof, which was not what occurred in reality.

Other photos from the set show men on motorbikes tearing up to the scene of the wreck, depicting the moment that paparazzi photographers appear on the scene, having been following Diana’s vehicle in pursuit of an image of her and Fayed, who also died in the crash along with the couple’s chauffeur.

The smashed Mercedes being used in the movie was also photographed on the back of a flatbed truck being driven off, similar to the moment that Diana’s wrecked car was taken away to be examined.

The onset pictures were taken just weeks after Prince Harry opened up about his anger and grief over his mother’s passing, saying that she’d been chased to death, before revealing his concerns about history repeating itself with his wife Meghan Markle during an interview with Oprah Winfrey for their Apple TV+ mental health series, The Me You Can’t See.

An inquest jury ruled the Princess of Wales and her partner died because of the grossly negligent driving of Henri Paul, who was allegedly around three times over the drink-drive limit.

They also singled out the paparazzi’s speed and the way they were driving as contributory factors but concluded the couple could have survived the accident had they been wearing seatbelts, therefore were not chased to death, but it’s just a shame Diana could not just be left in peace now, but then on the other hand, perhaps the truth of her death does need to come to light.

Summer Freedom On Hold For Four Weeks

Boris Johnson has pushed Freedom Day to July 19 as a new poll revealed that the preponderance of Britons wanted ministers to delay the lifting of all lockdown rules amid a spike in Indian variant cases.

A total of 53 per cent of UK voters wanted some lockdown rules to stay across the United Kingdom past June 21, while 25 per cent wanted all freedom limiting legislation to continue.

Just 34 per cent of people said they would like life to go back to normal on the day Boris Johnson pledged it would, a survey of 1,392 people conducted by YouGov for The Times found.

It came as Michael Tildesley, a University of Warwick epidemiologist, told BBC Radio 4 scientists needed to find the connection between cases and hospital admissions before any judgment could be made.

A separate question in the YouGov poll saw 22 per cent of people dub the rule of six, which currently limits indoor gatherings to only six people, their least favourite lockdown rule and said it should be lifted first.

The Prime Minister was planning to delay the final stage of his COVID roadmap by four weeks in a move that will likely infuriate MPs, business leaders and hospitality chiefs, but to appease Tory MPs and ministers, including Chancellor Rishi Sunak, who are keen to unleash the economy, the Prime Minister is expected to promise a review after a fortnight, but this could allow curbs to be ditched earlier if hospital admissions remain low.

The setback has been prompted by a sharp increase in cases of the Indian variant, and the British Medical Association calling for a stay to enable more people to receive their second jabs.

Cabinet sources had admitted that Freedom Day on June 21 was not looking great, with a four-week extension to COVID restrictions most likely to go ahead, and under the Prime Minister’s COVID roadmap, June 21 was supposed to be the day when all social distancing curbs were lifted and the work from home advice abandoned. However, Boris Johnson made his final decision and announced to the nation on Monday evening.

He said that they don’t want to be sliding into another lockdown, and to circumvent this they wanted to be careful and make sure they got enough data from the government as possible notifying them of what they might expect in a future wave as they begin to unlock further.

But many people are saying that it’s a fake poll and that they want the nation back to normal, and they’re fed up with all the propaganda, and politicians who order these draconian measures haven’t missed a paycheck since lockdown started.

Perhaps all these elected officials should have their paychecks stopped until the economy is opened up and back on its feet again because they’re not interested in a solution until it affects them!

And then we have the mainstream media that’s driving this warfare, and it appears that governments have weaponised COVID on their own people by way of psychological manipulation, and it seems that the preponderance of us are unable to see that we’re actually in a war.

Politics is a game of fear, and any society that rules understands that you have to keep class divided and that you have to create divisions within society, and if you create those divisions, you can maintain control.

And eventually, we will be punished, ordered or intimidated into having the vaccine, and those that fell for Boris Johnson’s lies and promises, well, he’s given us some freedom, but then he takes it away again, but then he doesn’t mind upsetting a few people here and there, as long as he’s getting a paycheck at the end of it – as long as I’m okay Jack, sod everyone else.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started