Texas Woman Whose Electric Bill Soared Over $9,000

A Texas woman filed a class-action lawsuit seeking $1 billion in relief for customers of electricity retailer Griddy, which the lawsuit says illegally engaged in price gouging amid widespread power outages across the state last week.

Lisa Khoury, who filed the action on behalf of all Griddy customers who were charged the steep prices, faced a $9,546 electric bill from February 1 through to February 19 as a result of the massive spike in wholesale electric prices in Texas amid a severe winter storm.

The company says on its website, that instead of a fixed price, Griddy is a service that enables customers to pay variable rates on their electricity, being charged what wholesale customers would be charged or precisely the amount they buy electricity at.

The suit says that last week, wholesale prices soared amid the outages that hit millions of Texans, spiking to $9,000 per megawatt-hour compared with the average rate of $50 per megawatt-hour.

Derek Potts, an attorney representing Khoury, said in a statement that they didn’t know how many people had been hit, but there were likely to be thousands of customers who would have received these exorbitant bills.

And he said that a class action would be the most effective and efficient way for Griddy’s customers to come together and fight this greedy pricing.

Griddy didn’t immediately respond to USA Today’s request for comment on the case, but on a page of commonly asked questions about the storm on its website, the company denies allegations of price gouging.

The suit endeavours to stop Griddy from billing and receiving payments on the charges with excess prices during the storm and forgiveness for late or unpaid payments as well as the monetary relief.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott said on Wednesday that the state was investigating providers whose prices spiked, and the Public Utility Commission of Texas issued an order on Sunday stopping providers until further notice from disconnecting customers who’ve not paid their bills.

Numerous customers use Griddy with the exception of paying less, the lawsuit said. On its website in a video demonstrating how the service works, Griddy bills itself as a company that saves customers money by not marking up prices as do all those other guys, you know the ones who’ve been preying on you, your parents and your neighbours for the past 20 years.

What people should be doing is reading the terms and conditions of the contract properly because what the big print giveth, the fine print taketh away, and most people don’t trouble to read it.

You should always read everything before you sign for it, and if the company is attempting to rush or pressure you, then maybe it’s not worth signing at all!

And what’s baffling is is how did they get those bills in the first place, and how did they use that much electricity if there was no electricity, to begin with? And what are they going to do when people can’t pay because their bills are so high? Shut off the power to everyone, that way they’re going to put themselves out of business – good luck Griddy.

Whether they agreed to pay a variable rate or not, charging them such excessive prices is a bit much, don’t you think? And we’re not talking about something that occurred slowly, we’re talking about something that happened overnight.

The whole thing about is now, is that these people will go out of business because they were greedy, and at the end of the day, they didn’t achieve anything, and they’re not supposed to price gouge in an emergency.

Gamer, 18, Killed Female Call of Duty Competitor

A student gamer purportedly stabbed a rival Call of Duty star to death before uploading a grisly video of the victim’s bloodied body to social media.

Guilherme Alves Costa, 18, has been arrested following the death of Ingrid Oliveira Bueno da Silva, 19, a gifted professional video game player in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

The two had played on competing teams in the game Call of Duty: Mobile and she’s understood to have gone to his home to take part in a joint competition after making contact last month.

Guilherme Alves Costa played online under the nickname ‘Flashlight’ for the team ‘Gamers Elite’ while the victim, a player for ‘FBI E-Sports, was known as ‘Sol’.

Local reports suggest that the alleged attacker left an extensive note explaining why he committed the crime, bemoaning about being tired with life, not having any goals, and not getting on with people.

Fellow gamers raised the alarm after Guilherme Alves Costa posted a video of the victim’s bloodied body, in which he could be heard laughing, on WhatsApp.

In the chilling clip posted after the killing, he said that people might think it was ink or that it had been edited or something, but it wasn’t, and that he’d actually killed her, and he said that he had a book as well, and he asked people to share it and read it because it contained some truths.

Guilherme Alves Costa is said to have fled the scene but police were summoned when his brother came home and discovered the bloodied young woman, who he didn’t know, lying motionless on the floor.

He’s reported to have also called his family to tell them he would commit suicide, but his brother purportedly then talked him out of it, urging him to hand himself in to the police instead, which he did.

Asked why he’d attacked the victim, Guilherme Alves Costa is said to have replied that he wanted to, and he’s said to have told the police that the victim had crossed his path and that he’d been planning the crime for two weeks.

Sources say he’s written a 52-page book to explain his motive, which is being examined by detectives.

The inquiry continues.

A Gamers Elite spokesperson told local media that the team’s leadership had never met the suspect and that members of the team were horrified by Guilherme Alves Costa actions.

This is horrifying, and yet people still don’t seem to see the link between violent games and violent conduct in real life. Although there are numerous gamers out there, and just because a tiny majority of gamers obscure the line between real life and games, it doesn’t mean they all do.

Numerous people play GTA et cetera, but not all of them have the urge to pick up a gun or do anything that the games portray, but some might because not everyone knows the distinction between right and wrong, so instead of raging at the game, they rage at other people.

Many people play GTA and might have a bundle of money, all by robbing banks, casinos, drug Lords Islands, selling weed, coke, fake cash, guns and forged documents. They might own about 60 cars including a Batmobile and a flying Delorean, 6 helicopters, a yacht and a submarine, but haven’t done any of the above in real life, and they’re certainly not multimillionaires.

People have been blowing people’s heads off in these games in unreal tournaments since they were about seven or eight years old, and are now older and have never had an inkling to go and shoot or stab anyone, and usually, these games are more of an outlet for stress and anger than causing them, but it only takes one unhinged soul!

Patrick Stewart Anger Over Brexit Outcome

Sir Patrick Stewart, 80, is one of the nation’s best-known performers and has experienced a remarkable career that has crossed six decades.

He’s taken on a variety of roles including Shakespeare productions, the TV show Star Trek and Marvel’s X-Men film franchise, but Sir Patrick Stewart, who was knighted more than a decade ago, came under attack after he unleashed a tumultuous rant about Brexit.

Three years after the British public voted to leave the EU, the actor stood up before a crowd in Paris to condemn the results of the referendum, and he whined that it was sickening to see Britons vote to break the invaluable bond between the United Kingdom and the EU.

And he confessed to taking part in a march for a second referendum in London in 2019, and he also argued that more of the country wanted to remain, despite the clear results from the first vote.

He told the 2019 Comic-Con audience that he needed them to know that well more than half of the population of the United Kingdom wanted to stay in the European Union.

His claim was contradicted by the results of the EU referendum, where 52 per cent of the public voted Leave and 48 per cent voted Remain, but some have suggested that reduced turnout may have been a factor in the 2016 vote but the claim remains unsubstantiated.

More than 72 per cent of the population, about 46.5 million people voted in the EU referendum, and in comparison, five per cent more of the population turned out to cast votes in the Brexit vote than they did in the 2019 General Election.

About 67 per cent of people voted in the referendum, which ended in victory for Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party.

Through Sir Patrick Stewart’s rant, he cited key historical moments that were influenced by Europe’s collective efforts.

He explained that when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, the Soviet Union ended its dominance and control over so many countries.

Sir Patrick Stewart listed the end of Apartheid in South Africa and the Good Friday Agreement, despite acknowledging there were still difficulties between the two Irish nations, and he said that the European Union was all part of that movement.

However, do people care what he thinks? Or has our withdrawal from the EU affected him financially in some way – always follow the money.

And he appears to have gone nuts, especially when he’s gone against the majority.

What does it matter to him, and why should he care when financially he can live anywhere in the world – a freedom very little of us can afford, and the elite millionaire club has surprisingly little impact on our well being, and it only seems to be wealthy personalities that endorse their policies.

At the end of the day we had a vote and it was Leave, and there’s not much we can do about it now, so perhaps we should just move forward instead of trying to plot to change the majorities wishes, and before the Remainers start distorting what I’ve said, I voted to remain and Labour, but what will be, will be, and there’s no point crying over spilt milk.

PE Teacher, 56, is Banned From Profession

A PE teacher has been banned from the profession after slapping a four-year-old boy on the knees when he threw a tantrum.

Ian Webber, 56, struck the child during an after school football club after carrying him across a sports hall by the shoulders in May 2018.

He warned the boy that if he kicked him again, he would slap him, before slapping him twice on the knees at a school in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands.

Earlier this month, a Teaching Regulation Agency panel heard the attack occurred after Ian Webber told the boy not to pull post-it notes off an ideas display.

The teacher, of Polesworth, Warwickshire, denied striking the boy by hitting but was found guilty at Birmingham Magistrates Court in February 2019.

He’s now been banned from the teaching profession for life after a misconduct hearing ruled his actions amounted to unacceptable professional behaviour.

Ian Webber had been issued with a warning before striking the boy after flicking a child’s throat in 2016 but his behaviour towards young children had become more dangerous.

The panel chairman, Alan Meyrick, ruled that his conduct involved improper physical contact with a very young nursery aged child and that it involved repeated slapping of a four-year-old child on the knees in response to his behaviour at an after school football practice.

He said, furthermore, the conduct took place in the context of an earlier written warning at the same school in 2016 following earlier improper physical contact by Mr Webber towards another child.

He added that in light of the panel’s findings against Mr Webber, there was a strong public interest consideration in respect of the protection of pupils, and the panel was of the opinion that prohibition was both proportionate and appropriate.

And that Mr Webber’s obvious lack of guilt concerning what he did and apparent lack of insight into its effect was a vital factor in determining that conclusion.

He said that despite the findings of the criminal court, at which he denied any wrongdoing, he maintained his denials before the panel.

Through Mr Webber’s trial, the teacher of 16 years insisted he never hit the boy and the slapping sound heard by witnesses may have been him giving the boy a high five, but district judge David Robinson found Mr Webber guilty of assault by beating after saying the evidence of the victim and three other boys were clear and believable.

If it had been a parent they would have been charged with child abuse, and if an adult can’t control a four-year-old child without being physical with them, especially a teacher, they have no business being around children, and there was no excuse for his conduct.

However, teachers aren’t punching bags, no matter what age the child is. This is precisely why we have so much violence and knife crimes and shootings because these children are all now protected and they steal from people and have them living in complete fear.

But the boy was four years old, he was not in a position to beat the child, and the parents should have been called in, and we have no idea if the child had issues, and it wouldn’t have been difficult to take the child into a quiet place until they calmed down, and then to explain why what they did was wrong, in words that they could understand.

Teaching is a stressful job, and some might say that if it’s too stressful they shouldn’t be doing the job, but they’re not taught how to deal with challenging children, they’re just taught how to teach them – they’re teachers, not social workers, and as we all know children can be really irritating, but lovely at the same time.

Parents Defend Teacher

Parents have come to the defence of a junior school headteacher who was criticised and ridiculed by Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain for having tattoos.

On Tuesday, Piers Morgan hit out at Lee Hill, the headteacher of Howden Junior School in East Yorkshire, who’s decided to remove historical personages like Sir Walter Raleigh, Admiral Nelson and Francis Drake, who are synonymous with Britain’s colonial past, from the school’s curriculum.

The pupils will instead learn about modern figures such as Greta Thunberg, Marcus Rashford, Malala Yousafzai and Amanda Gorman.

Piers Morgan is predictably not a fan of the decision by Lee Hill who he labelled ultra woke and accused him of cancelling the aforementioned historical figures as well as saying that he was covered in Beckham style tattoos and that he comes from an era where image matters.

The presenter added that next, it would be Winston Churchill with this old tattoo guy and that he’ll be cancelling everybody for being despicable, rather than educating children about our history.

However, there’s been a significant pushback on Piers Morgan’s remarks by the parent’s of the children who go to Lee Hill’s school, and it seems that parents have been defending Lee Hill on Facebook and praising him for trying to improve the school.

One parent wrote that they could only go on their own experience of their son as his school and that quite honestly they could only stand for the vast preponderance of parents and the community that, as a headteacher, Lee Hill was outstanding.

That parent said that Lee Hill had turned around his son’s entire attitude and school life. That he’d climbed over all the COVID hurdles and still put the children’s best interests at heart in every way he possibly could.

A woman who claimed her sister went to the school also praised the job that Lee Hill has been doing and called Piers Morgan’s comments out of order, and she said that it was bang out of order to judge someone on their tattoos and that she didn’t believe that it affected his teaching ability.

A third parent added that Mr Hill had been an incredible headteacher through the pandemic, and that he’d hosted lots of events at the school to give the children something to look forward to, and that he made Christmas magical with an inflatable Santa and snowball fighting.

And that he’d ensured that no child went hungry and loaned out laptops so all the children could access home learning.

But perhaps old and new history should be taught, because time moves on and everything becomes history. However, Piers Morgan does appear to have an attitude problem and we should never be judged, and Lee Hill seems to have a lot of admiration from his pupils as well as the parents.

Piers Morgan is obnoxious and pompous about all different types of people. Of course, sometimes he does have a point but mostly he’s just doing it for the publicity, and generally, he doesn’t come across as a very nice person, and yet we allow him into our lives every day.

And whilst some people might not agree with this headteachers ideas. Many might not agree with Piers Morgan, who frequently comes across as being a bit of a bully on TV, and thinking outside of the box a bit, perhaps we oldies need to realise that teaching of the future means new people to learn about.

So the modern hero’s who we oldies might not want to know about, are the ones our children do want to know about.

It might be our history, but it’s not our children’s history. We don’t have to erase the old history, but perhaps for our younger children it’s better that they learn about modern history because it’s their history and times are moving on.

Commons Defeat Leaves Flat Owners Facing Enormous Bills To Fix Cladding

A plan to protect leaseholders from the spiralling costs of fixing fire safety problems in the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy has been rejected in parliament after the Government headed off a cross-party challenge.

Hundreds of thousands of homeowners are facing bills of up to £100,000 to repair unsafe cladding, fire doors and insulation systems found after the 14 June 2017 fire, but ministers rejected proposals from the House of Lords, Labour and some Conservative backbenchers to protect them from costs.

Amendments to the fire safety bill were defeated in a Commons vote on Wednesday evening after Labour accused the Government of moving at a snail’s pace to tackle the problem.

It warned that 11 million people may be affected by both immediate fire hazards and problems with insurance and certification, making many homes unsaleable.

The bill is the first piece of primary legislation introduced as a consequence of the Grenfell tragedy, which occurred four years ago this June.

Also defeated was a motion to force the Government to implement key recommendations from the Grenfell Tower inquiry including making owners tell fire brigades what materials are in-wall systems, inspect fire doors yearly and lifts monthly, all things that failed during the Grenfell fire, which took 72 lives.

Earlier this month the Government announced a £3.5 billion extension of the fund to pay to remove faulty cladding on buildings over the height of 18 metres, but it only offered loans for fixing those below 18 metres and nothing for other widespread defects such as missing firebreaks and faulty fire doors or paying for 24-hour fire patrols and steep insurance premium hikes.

Sarah Jones, the shadow police and fire minister, told parliament she’d heard from first hand (from leaseholders) the horrors the Government is wilfully enabling by not protecting them from costs.

Some have seen yearly insurance costs for their blocks rise from £30,000 to £500,000, while one block with 56 leaseholders in Kent has already paid more than £500,000 for 24-hour fire warden patrols.

Julie Fraser, who faces a bill of up to £40,000 on a flat she purchased in Runcorn, Cheshire, for £75,000, said that it was dreadful, and that she doesn’t have another £400,000 to throw at a building, and that she might as well go bankrupt.

It doesn’t seem fair to ask the public to finance the costs. Could you imagine asking a council tenant, unable to afford getting onto the housing ladder, to compensate for the unexpected expenses incurred on someone else’s home purchase?

Having said that, it’s not fair for leaseholders to foot this bill either. Although I’m not sure what the solution is, it’s a crummy deal for everyone, except the housebuilders, of course, they seem to be minted.

Perhaps whoever put them up should foot the bill, and how can any of these MPs live with themselves, or sleep at night – it’s shameful and morally repugnant.

Building firms and developers should be accountable for putting these buildings right because the manufacturers of the panels were shown to be culpable, and it’s sickening that Government regulations didn’t protect all these people in the first place, and of course, now they won’t foot the bill.

This is very frustrating, and if it weren’t for COVID this would be much bigger news, and how much longer are the people of this country going to put up with the Tories defecating on them from a great height?

The developers of the flat should be held accountable for the cladding as they’re the ones that built the flats in the first place, and fire safety is not fit for purpose.

Flat owners shouldn’t be held accountable for any costs for a historical issue and it’s not right that both the developers for this kind of cladding, the authorities who agreed on it, and the manufacturers who made the product that was not fit for purpose aren’t taking any responsibility.

Ministers Mull COVID Passport

Ministers are mulling a COVID clear system for people to demonstrate they’ve tested negative or had a vaccine to help open up pubs and sporting events.

The plan is understood to be under consideration as part of the Government’s approach to get the country up and running again.

Boris Johnson threw scepticism on the idea of vaccine passports saying it could be prejudicial against people who genuinely refuse jabs or can’t have them for legitimate reasons.

But the Prime Minister ordered Michael Gove to carry out a review of whether a more comprehensive system of COVID certification could be used to help reopen the United Kingdom.

One option perceived to be on the table would involve businesses able to check test results on the NHS app.

Individuals would be able to show that they’ve either had a jab or tested negative, maintaining their decision about vaccination.

Government sources stressed that no decisions had been taken and work was at an early stage, but supporters say that such a concept could help theatres, cinemas, sporting venues and workplaces get back towards normality more quickly.

On a visit to a school in South London, Boris Johnson said there were extensive and complicated issues involved in taking the new level of asking people to prove things about their health to access businesses or services.

He said that they can’t be prejudicial against people who for whatever reason can’t have the vaccine, there might be medical reasons why people can’t have the vaccine. Or some people may genuinely decline to have one, but that he thought it was a mistake, and that he believed that everyone should have the vaccine, but they needed to thrash all this out.

In the meantime, Sir Jonathan Montgomery, who’s led an evidence review into vaccine passports, said the scheme would come too late to save summer because people would need two jabs to qualify and most young people wouldn’t have both until the autumn.

The University College London professor of healthcare law told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that there were three obstacles his research team had identified.

He said, the first was the scientific one – does it work, and that all depends on this information about the risk of transmission. The second was a timing problem, and he said that they need to reopen the economy as soon as it’s safe to do so, and that vaccine passports were not going to be beneficial until people have had their second vaccine.

You can’t make people do something they don’t want to do, it’s as simple as that, and we must never be in a position where people are being made to have a medical procedure to carry on with their normal daily lives.

Vaccines in this country are not compulsory, you have to consent, but consent can never be true if it’s conditional.

The problem is, that in the end, people probably will be forced to have the vaccine, and sadly they will be suckered into this, but I don’t believe that the young and healthy are going to take the vaccine, and there will probably be numerous under 25s that will laugh at this vaccine rollout.

Many of our youngsters are informed and well-read – much more than our thick-witted government think, and they would rather take their 99.7 per cent chance of being sick than compromising their young and healthy immune system.

Dogs Are Mysteriously Turning Blue And Pink In A Russian City

Packs of dogs in eastern Russia are inexplicably turning up pink and blue.

The bizarre phenomenon has occurred in and around the town of Dzerzhinsk, about 242 miles east of Moscow, near the abandoned Dzerzhinskoye Orgsteklo chemical plant that once manufactured extremely toxic hydrocyanic acid, which is also a core component in a once commonly used “Prussian blue” dye.

According to vets, experts think this detail may help illustrate why some dogs are now blue through and through, including their faeces.

Without clearer details, Dmitry Karelkin, head physician of Zoozashchita veterinary hospital, officially blamed the blue colour on “some kind of chemical,” which doesn’t appear to have harmed the animals physically.

Meanwhile, examiners from the Lobachevsky Research Institute of Chemistry at Nizhny Novgorod State University, as well as the Committee for State Veterinary Surveillance, found “no signs of irritating chemical burns,” while results from the blood and stool tests did not show significant toxicity.

And according to a news outlet, the blue dogs reportedly will remain under close inspection for around twenty days. Meanwhile, no announcements have been made to specifically address pooches that turn up pink.

However, some are calling for an investigation of a chemical dump in another area of Dzerzhinsk, where 300,000 tonnes of poisonous waste was dumped after the Cold War. The nearby Kristall defence plant was also implicated in local news.

A news outlet has reported that city officials are calling the claims exaggerated.

Maybe blue fur coats made in Russia will be coming soon! Or are these poor doggies just cold and the fur is showing it? Perhaps in motherland Russia, dogs now want to colour up their lives, or the Russians might blame it on climate change, but it’s okay, as long as we don’t all start glowing in the dark, we should be okay!

A Loud Bang Was Heard

Investigations of aircraft accidents and incidents can take more than a year, but officials usually get an early read on factors that may have played a role.

On Monday, two days after the high profile engine malfunction on United Airlines Flight 328 from Denver to Honolulu, the National Transportation Safety Board held its first briefing on the incident, highlighting possible metal fatigue to an engine fan blade and documenting a loud bang heard on the cockpit voice recorder.

NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt gave details on how the in-flight emergency unfolded and offered preliminary findings.

Approximately four minutes after takeoff from Denver International Airport early Saturday afternoon, when the aircraft was at 12,500 feet and cruising at 280 knots, a loud bang was heard on the cockpit voice recorder and increased vibrations were recorded on the affected engine.

The pilots declared an emergency with air traffic controllers and began a critical in-flight checklist, including the shut down of the engine.

Boeing 777 grounding explained, visually that the Pratt and Whitney engine failure involved two incidents on the same day.

The plane’s condition didn’t need an immediate evacuation upon landing, and after passengers deplaned, it was taken to a nearby United hangar for examination.

Pieces from the plane, including those that fell from the sky across Bloomfield, Colorado, are now laid out on the floor of the hangar.

The cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorders were sent for analysis to NTSB facilities in Washington, DC.

Two of the 22 fan blades on one of the Pratt and Whitney engines were damaged. One fan blade separated at the root and the other was fractured in the middle, likely getting struck as the other blade was separating.

One of the pieces was discovered in a soccer field in Broomfield, a Denver suburb. A preliminary examination of the fractured fan blade exhibits signs of damage consistent with metal fatigue.

The signs were so-called beach marks or crack arrest marks that can usually be seen with the naked eye. Sumwalt compared it to marks left during tides.

He said it’s like if the ocean comes in and goes back out, you’re going to see a mark where the ocean was.

United Airlines engine failure on Boeing 777 flight to Hawaii – what travellers need to know.

The fractured fan blade was being flown overnight by a private plane to Pratt and Whitney facilities for examination.

Of course, it’s good to hear that everyone on the aircraft is safe, and, fortunately, no one on the ground was hurt or killed from the large debris that came down.

Piers Morgan Warns Troll ‘I Will Find You And Publicly Expose You’

Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan has opened up on his trolling and death threats hell after a troll sent him horrifying messages on social media.

Piers Morgan reported the message to the police and they came and took a statement from him after an unidentified user on Instagram commented on a photo of Piers and his son Spencer, promising they would kill them both.

The chilling comment read that he was a marked man and that calling the police, big tech, or beefing up security wasn’t going to stop them getting him and that it wasn’t a threat, it was a promise, and that he was getting killed.

Speaking alongside co-host Susanna Reid about social media abuse, Piers Morgan said that he’d had a death threat made to him last week on his eldest son’s Instagram, very direct, they said that it wasn’t a promise, it’s going to happen and that they were going to find him and they were going to kill him.

But they also threatened to kill his son as well and Piers thought he was not going to have this, and he said that you can have a legitimate discourse on Twitter, it can be punchy, you can hold public figures to account, you can say what you want and you can have opinions, but you’re not allowed to issue death threats to people.

So he called the police and they came round and took it extremely seriously. So, he thanked the police and now they’re investigating.

He also spoke to Facebook because he knows some top people there because they own Instagram and he said that it wasn’t acceptable. They’re cooperating as well, and he’s going through the process and see what happens.

Because now he wants to know and find these people. They now have their account deleted. But who is this person who believes it’s acceptable to issue death threats on Instagram to his son?

I can’t stand Piers Morgan, but I do agree with him that a line has been crossed, even though he’s one of the most irritating and over-opinionated people there is, but death threats against anyone is out of order, and at the end of the day, his son hasn’t done anything to warrant such despicable threats.

He’s upset someone but that doesn’t justify someone threatening his and his son’s life, and if someone went after one of my children in the same way I’d be as outraged as he is.

Nobody deserves this, and he might be irritating and outspoken, but he’s never threatened to kill anyone and he’s certainly never threatened to kill someone’s son – he’s allowed his opinions, but that doesn’t justify death threats.

There are some gifted hackers out there that would be able to find out precisely who it was who sent the threats, and if the police and Facebook can’t find the person, then perhaps Piers Morgan could go down that route, providing he can get approval from Facebooks owned Instagram.

It seems like Piers Morgan has made many enemies throughout acting like a hard man, although that doesn’t give anyone free rein to threaten him or his son.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started