No Deal With The EU Could Trigger Immediate Bonus With Lower Prices

The UK has been urged to move swiftly to strip taxes from goods manufactured to any scale outside of the country in the event of a no-deal Brexit, in a move that could trigger an instant bonus to consumers.

Trade talks between the United Kingdom and the EU began in March, with the goal of agreeing a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA) before the completion of the transition period on December 31, a deadline Boris Johnson refused to extend.

But after seven rounds of official discussions, led by Britain’s David Frost and Brussels counterpart Michel Barnier, progress has hampered, raising concerns that a no-trade agreement will be in place from January 1, 2021.

Ahead of the start of the eighth round of official talks in London, Michel Barnier initiated a stringent deadline of October 31 for a deal to be agreed so it has time to be approved in the European Parliament before the transition period deadline at the end of the year.

However, he proceeded to warn that obstinacy from the United Kingdom on a set of red lines, including fisheries, state aid and the EU’s level playing field, is raising the possibility of a no-deal Brexit.

Patrick Sullivan, chief executive of the Westminster based think tank Parliament Street, thinks the EU will make the first important move in upcoming trade talks as it frantically strives to prop up the struggling Eurozone economy.

The Eurozone’s rebound from its deepest economic downturn on record ground to a sudden halt in August, in the April to June quarter. The bloc’s market plunged 12.1 per cent as coronavirus lockdowns led to businesses being closed and people staying home.

IHS Market’s final Composite Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI), recognised as a reliable measure of economic health, dropped to a score of 51.9 per cent last month from July’s 54.9 per cent.

Mr Sullivan said the EU will blink first because if Europe has any expectation of getting its economy back on track, investment is paramount which is where the City of London comes in.

He said, only through access to London’s financial expertise can Eurozone economies become more resilient. He continued that a Brexit deal was more important to the EU and eliminating those barriers while still selling to the EU across even small tariffs, as is done by the rest of the world, could usher a new era of lower prices and heightened competition in the United Kingdom.

Yes! Slash many important taxes on things that we don’t actually produce ourselves, for example, fruit and vegetables from equatorial countries, but it has to be done in such a way that we keep onside our negotiating partners who we’re hoping to inherit current EU deals from places such as Canada and Mexico, and just bear in mind that just before last year’s election, Canada and Singapore suspended our negotiations because of this.

Fisheries, the EU wants the exact EU biased access to UK waters which still leave us with less than a third of the fishing rights and they demand the exact same access whilst telling the United Kingdom that we can’t expect the same access to trade.

EU State Aid Rules, the EU wants the United Kingdom to solicit approval from the EU if we want to bail out a UK company in need, but the EU can refuse to let the UK do so and the level playing field is, the EU doesn’t want the United Kingdom to thrive and is this part of the punishment regime they have in place?

Tories Still Ahead Of Labour In The Poll

Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party are still leading in the polls against the Labour Party despite leader Sir Keir Starmer’s popularity and despite the intense debate over the awarding of GCSE and A level grades, the Tories were the choice of 34.57 per cent of respondents of an exclusive OnePoll survey for the Sunday Express.

The party came out in front of Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour (30.22 per cent) and way ahead of Sir Ed Davey’s Liberal Democrats 95.29 per cent).

The poll uncovered enduring support for the Brexit Party, despite the United Kingdom leaving the European Union earlier this year after 47 years as a member state and almost one in 20 of those polled would vote for the party which Nigel Farage turned into a political comedy.

The Government can expect strong support if it makes a safe and effective coronavirus vaccine mandatory for all UK nationals and visitants, the latest research shows.

Polling reveals a strong desire to get as much of the population as possible vaccinated and more than two thirds (64.09 per cent) of respondents to research by OnePoll favoured strongly or somewhat that the vaccine should be mandatory when it’s developed unless people have a medical reason not to be vaccinated.

Less than one in five people (18.18 per cent) opposed somewhat or strongly with mandatory vaccination.

The United Kingdom has now secured access to six possible vaccines as scientists around the world race to exterminate the menace to life posed by COVID 19.

Vaccine campaigns have proven wildly controversial and have been the target of conspiracy theories but Paul Bristow, a Conservative member of Westminster’s health committee, expected strong support for public vaccination.

He said that if we get a vaccine it will be a tremendous breakthrough if we can beat this virus for good. He maintained that this was a sensible nation and that he wasn’t shocked that a preponderance of people wanted to see everyone vaccinated.

He further said that he knew there was a lot of anti-vax garbage on social media so the Government must do what it can to counter this but that he was convinced that most would want to get vaccinated without any compulsion.

Health Minister Jo Churchill has revealed that while there’s a desire to get as many people as possible vaccinated, people may have to be prioritised according to the availability of supplies, safety and its effectiveness in various groups. However, there are no plans to target regions with the highest levels of COVID 19.

And there’s absolutely no point in having runners and riders for an election. Boris Johnson still has 4 years to go in his tenure and I don’t see him quitting any time soon.

Rishi Sunak is popular because he’s handing out cash like smarties but his real test will be how he deals with the fallout caused by the massive debt. He could be our biggest knave or a hero, only time will tell.

Concerns Of New Harry And William Rift

There are fears of a further rift between Prince Harry and Prince William following news the Duke and Duchess of Sussex could make a documentary about Princess Diana as part of their new deal with Netflix.

On Wednesday Netflix stated it had agreed on a deal with Harry and Meghan to produce a number of programs for the streaming platform. These will reportedly include documentaries, films and programming for children.

Speaking to a news outlet, one royal insider said these could include an in-depth documentary about Princess Diana, Harry and William’s late mother. However, they warned that this could create new tensions between the two siblings.

Princess Diana was killed in a Paris car crash one year after completing her divorce from Prince Charles.

The insider said that the Sussexes were considering making a feature documentary on Princess Diana’s family history and heritage and that it was in the initial stages but it seemed like it could happen and that it could work as a tribute to Diana and build on all the incredible charity work she’d done.

Netflix would love to make a documentary about Diana and it’s something they’ve been pushing for.

Last month a new book about Harry and Meghan’s departure as senior royals, ‘Finding Freedom’ was published and it alleged relations between the two siblings declined early during Harry’s involvement with Meghan after William urged his brother to take as much time as he needed to get to know this girl.

According to the insider, there are concerns a documentary about Princess Diana could cause further tensions and they stated that William and Harry now have a complicated relationship and that they haven’t spoken for three months and that these plans could further antagonise their fallout, and if it does happen William will be the first to know.

Meghan and Harry announced they were planning to stand down as senior members of the Royal Family back in January and the Duke and Duchess vowed to become financially independent and said they would divide their time between North America and the United Kingdom.

Recently the pair bought a new £11.2 million home in the north of Los Angeles. The extravagant home comes complete with a swimming pool, tennis court and a children’s cottage.

On Wednesday Ted Sarandos, the Netflix chief content officer spoke about how happy the company is to be working with the Duke and Duchess and he said that Harry and Meghan have inspired millions of people all around the globe with their authenticity, confidence and leadership.

However, it’s about time they quit playing the Diana card, and it’s time for them to move on, it seems everyone else has and now more than 30 per cent of this country wasn’t even born when Diana died, so have no concept who she was and some of them probably don’t even care.

And for Prince Harry to involve himself with the company responsible for a tacky, tawdry show about his late mother is shocking, unbelievable and completely inexcusable and that’s one sure-fire way to stain his mother’s memory.

You just can’t do a documentary about Diana without muddying the waters and I think we all know Harry and Meghan will trade-off death and use it to get rich quick but thankfully William and his family have not gone down that tacky road.

So, the latest is Harry could be pimping off his mother’s memory and the ultimate hypocrisy is to spend one’s entire adult life criticising the media’s exploitation of his mother, while at the same time, exploiting his mother’s life publicly for financial gain.

This Is For You Buddy!

He wanted to be prepared for when his former neighbour and Kammerer Middle School classmate took to the boards to claim her Oscar.

“Oh My God! That’s my girl! She did it! Yeah! Yeah! Yeah,” said the 23-year-old, who has Down syndrome, while bouncing up and down, cheering and pumping his hands in the air.

“She got it! I love you, Jennifer!”

Seeing his childhood buddy get an Oscar was a moment he’d been waiting on for weeks. That’s because he says he and the star are “like best friends” and he’s her “No. 1 fan.”

Earlier that evening, just before 7 pm, Andy Strunk slipped on a black tuxedo, an outfit he’d been preparing for weeks. He wanted to be dressed to the nines, just as if he was attending the Oscars himself, while he watched Jennifer Lawrence walk the red carpet during the celebrity arrivals.

“She looks perfect,” he said about her blush Dior gown.

Then, at 8.30 pm as the awards show was kicking off, Strunk settled himself on a leather sofa and kept his eyes fixated on the television. He didn’t want to miss seeing the “Silver Linings Playbook” actress in the audience.

When the camera swept the crowd and showed the star sitting in her seat, he clapped and roared “Woo! That’s her!”

Strunk’s black-tie outfit wasn’t the only special thing he had planned for that night while cheering on the hometown star. He and his mother, Pollyanna Strunk baked a white cake covered with buttercream frosting, which Strunk dubbed the celebration cake in honour of “Silver Linings Playbook”, they decorated with silver sprinkles.

Jennifer Lawrence’s aunt, Cindy Miller of Louiseville, stopped by the home of Strunk in the afternoon and dropped off a “Silver Linings Playbook” poster autographed by the star.

Strunk said that he’ll be hanging it in his bedroom with the other Jennifer Lawrence memorabilia he’s collected over the years, including movie posters and hundreds of newspaper cuttings and magazine articles.

Jennifer Lawrence has autographed numerous pictures for her childhood friend with personal messages like “Don’t forget about me” and “With all my love”.

“Jennifer Lawrence is my favourite… She’s a nice person. She’s a strong person,” Strunk said and he capped off the evening by eating a slice of the cake he helped bake, sending a text message to Jennifer’s mother, Karen Lawrence.

Once Jennifer got off stage, she called her friend and said: “This was for you buddy!”

But honestly, was this newsworthy? Jennifer Lawrence has a friend, we all have friends, but then numerous people wouldn’t bother to have a friend with a disability and we do treat people differently, and why would you want to be treated like a trophy because of a disability?

And for those wondering, he does exist and they actually are friends and we should have more human beings like that in the world because then the world would be a better place.

And it’s delightful that she’s still best friends with someone she grew up with, which must be rare for a Hollywood A-lister, although instead of just calling him, why didn’t she just acknowledge him on stage?

However, this isn’t something that can be argued as a difference of opinion – this is a human being, plus, I’d rather have this caring man as a best friend and a best friend doesn’t necessarily have the same role for every single person.

A best friend isn’t one exact type of person – a best friend can be whatever you want a best friend to be to you and it’s not the fact that the man is disabled it’s because she grew up with him and she hasn’t forgotten where she came from.

It’s Okay To Have An Opinion

It’s also okay to disagree with someone else’s opinion, but it’s not okay to demean someone because they don’t think the same as you do, so we should all show some respect.

This is such a true and valid statement, although Donald Trump doesn’t seem to think that way.

Not everyone needs to have an opinion on current issues and often than not, certain opinions are misinformed and some opinions tend to gain support from ignorant masses that may not have the expertise to judge its credibility.

At the end of the day, people believe what they want to believe and some folks aren’t even open to the idea of the opposing party being correct, and some don’t even want to listen to other people’s opinions and even if they do, there’s never any acceptance or an agreeable stance.

And it’s pretty rare that you even have a conversation in a nonviolent manner because someone out there always gets personally offended or resentful about what you’re talking about.

You can’t even express an opinion like I don’t like the taste of processed, sliced bread – that you prefer bakery loaves without someone leaping down your throat about how not liking sliced bread makes you a bigot, homophobic or sexist. Telling you all about how they love sliced bread, so in conclusion, you’re mentally handicapped and you’re wrong and they’re right.

And if you choose not to decide on a particular thing, you still made a choice, it’s called free will and if you choose to wait until all of the relevant information is out there, then everything is already over and you’re too late to interact with it all.

On the flip side, it’s okay to have an opinion even if you aren’t an authority in the field, and it’s fine if you believe a house should be constructed using an iron frame rather than timber.

The difficulty comes when you refuse to change your opinion or listen to honest experts and people will reprimand you for having an opinion about something even if you’re open to debate.

In real life, you have to make a lot of decisions without having sufficient information. For instance, you’re forced to choose a car without being a mechanic.

You can do all the research but at the end of the day you will have to decide on a model of automobile and weigh up information without being an authority in the field.

Clearly, this depends on circumstances because some decisions carry more weight and impact on others and you could use Eeny, meeny, miny, moe to purchase your car, but not doing proper research when it’s about your child’s medical condition will get people upset.

And it’s okay not to care but it’s not okay to say it doesn’t matter because that tends to lead to people taking advantage of you.

It’s better to say you don’t have an opinion if you’re ill-informed than to just pick a side but I also find it ironic that people have an opinion on not having an opinion.

At the end of the day, it’s a two-party system, the movers and shakers and the makers and takers and it’s the same old story, but in a hip new language.

Nadia Sawalha Wades In

Nadia Sawalha has come to the defence of her Loose Women co-star Denise Welch following her This Morning appearance, and subsequent Twitter dispute with Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan.

Piers Morgan, 55, lashed out on Twitter and branded Loose Women presenter Denise Welch a COVID denier.

It came after the former Coronation Street actress voiced her concerns over the Government prioritising coronavirus on This Morning.

Nadia Sawalha has since shown her support for her colleague and friend Denise Welch after Piers Morgan slammed the latter as deluded and dangerous.

In view of her 170,000 Twitter supporters, the ex Eastenders star praised Denise Welch as a fine woman as she extended her support.

Nadia Sawalha wrote that she genuinely hoped that neither Piers Morgan nor anyone he loves has to endure the pain of struggling with their mental health and that she was sending the biggest of hugs to Denise Welch who was a fine woman.

Piers Morgan retweeted the post and claimed if a loved one suffered from mental illness he would not allow them to go on television to spew ill-informed rubbish about COVID.

Nadia Sawalha took the opportunity to reply and said it was frustrating that people’s opinions are dismissed when they suffer from mental health and she added: “Can you not be better than this?”

Piers Morgan didn’t hold back and alleged that he frequently gets abusive c**p aimed at him from Denise Welch and that if she didn’t want it back then she shouldn’t dish it out, and that if she does dish it out, she shouldn’t hide behind mental health when people do respond.

Piers Morgan and Denise Welch’s online dispute began after the Loose Women presenter appeared on This Morning via video link with Ruth Langsford and Eamonn Holmes.

She was talking about the Government’s current position on coronavirus, where Denise Welch maintained it was a form of fear-mongering.

She said that as a mental health person, if people want to say that she’s on about that again, she didn’t mind because of the people it does help and that she would do anything to better balance the fear-mongering.

And she quickly hit back in view of her own 467,000 supporters, writing Piers Morgan should show her one tweet, one interview where she’s denied COVID and that he didn’t want to be telling complete and utter lies with such a huge following.

Piers Morgan has no idea of the impact these last six months have had on people suffering from mental health and his remarks are misguided, but honestly, it’s like a room full of children and Piers Morgan loves to irritate people and some people just fall straight into that trap and the best thing is to just ignore him because he’s a windup merchant.

Anyhow, there’s nothing wrong with being called a COVID denier, everyone has their own view of this virus and it’s untold damage by the way of the hysterical reaction to it but sometimes it’s refreshing to hear other people’s view, instead of the mantra we hear from the Government.

Gary Lineker Can Continue Twitter Rhetorics

Gary Lineker will be excluded from new BBC edicts requiring its staff to reign in their political opinions on social media, it’s been claimed.

It comes as new BBC head Tim Davie said he’s leading a fresh approach at the BBC for the corporation to become more impartial.

He said this would mean BBC staff would face new rules requiring them to watch what they say on social media platforms such as Twitter.

Gary Lineker, who’s blunt about his own personal beliefs, has previously dismissed being concerned about the push for impartiality and a BBC spokesperson said the retired sports star and Match of the Day presenter will not be expected to adhere to the new rules at all.

The spokesperson told a media outlet that Gary Lineker was not involved in any news or political output for the BBC and as such, any expression of his personal political views did not affect the BBC’s impartiality.

Sources said other staff who are not involved in the BBC’s news and current affairs output will likewise be exempt from the social media rules, although it’s not currently clear what Mr Davies’ new rules will be.

Mr Davie said that if you want to be an outspoken columnist or a partisan campaigner on social media then it’s a valid choice, but you should not be working at the BBC.

He further said that they’ll take action in the coming weeks, but to be clear, there will be new guidance on how they best deliver their impartiality guideline, new social media rules, which will be rigorously implemented, and more precise direction on the declaration of external interests and that their research shows that too many perceive them to be shaped by a particular perspective.

He said that they essentially need to champion and recommit to impartiality and that it was deliverable and that it was essential and he said that if you work at the BBC, nothing should be more exciting than exploring different views, seeking evidence with curiosity and creatively presenting testimony.

“To be clear, this is not about abandoning democratic values such as championing fair debate or an abhorrence of racism.

“But it is about being free from political bias, guided by the pursuit of truth, not a particular agenda.”

Gary Lineker has previously been critical of Brexit on his Twitter account, calling for a ‘People’s Vote’, a second referendum, on at least one occasion and the TV presenter said in one Tweet that it was pretty clear now that there is no good deal. That there was this rotten deal or an even more painful no deal.

However, the play is on the British public. The BBC is creating the illusion of change when they have no intention of doing so and if Gary Lineker had expressed right-wing or anti-migrant views he would have been off the air years ago. It’s only because he’s left-wing that he’s allowed to continue, that, in itself, is indicative of bias.

So much for a new start, same meat different gravy and this man is just another wannabe celebrity, his presenting is terrible and his wages obscene and our licence fee should not be used to pay this man and at the end of this Gary Lineker is of little importance and more of a nuisance, like a fly in the room, although a pretty expensive one.

Prince Andrew Under Pressure

Prince Andrew has come under heightened pressure to speak to the FBI about Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged child sex trafficking crimes after demonstrations exploded outside Buckingham Palace.

Footage of furious demonstrators chanting ‘paedophile’ outside the Palace gates has been seen by millions of people online.

Numerous people held placards that called for an end to child trafficking, during the Freedom For The Children Global Walk London, amid reports child trafficking has actually increased throughout the coronavirus crisis.

And the extraordinary video broadcasting online clearly reveals how the issue of the Duke of York’s association with the late Jeffrey Epstein is not going away.

The Duke of York has further been accused of having sex with Virginia Roberts Guiffre, who claims to be a trafficking victim of Jeffrey Epstein, on three occasions when she was only 17 years old.

However, the Duke of York vehemently rejects this accusation and Buckingham Palace said in a statement that it absolutely denies that the Duke of York had any kind of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts Guiffre and that any claim to the contrary is untrue and without foundation.

Ms Giuffre recently spoke out again ahead of a new documentary, saying that she’s running out of hope because Prince Andrew has still not spoken to the FBI and US prosecutors have claimed the Duke of York is not helping with their investigation, whilst Prince Andrew’s team claim he’s attempted to help three times this year.

In the meantime, Prince Andrew’s long time friend Ghislaine Maxwell who was the one who introduced him to Jefferey Epstein has been arrested and is awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, as well as perjury charges. However, Ghislaine Maxwell refutes any wrongdoing.

Royal commentators have argued that the image of protestors outside Buckingham Palace is an incredibly bad look for the Royal Family.

Pod Save the Queen is hosted by Ann Gripper and features Daily Mirror royal editor Russel Myers, who said the people at the Palace that he’s spoken to have confirmed that this did, in fact, take place, but there hasn’t been any comment from them.

However, could these people not have protested when they were pulling down statues, where were they then? Although this is something totally different, this is paedophilia and this is about protecting our children and children come before anything or anyone else.

And if Prince Andrew has nothing to hide, why is he dragging it on because at the end of the day it will only look worse for him.

All he needs to do is go to America and get this stopped, otherwise it will go on and on and then people will believe he’s guilty and what makes me really laugh about this is, if he was innocent, he would come out with confident body language, but instead he came out with this negative quivering sweating body language and he needs to be ordered to go back to the United States to answer interrogatories.

This is what happens when you mess with young girls and the only head you were listening to was the one in your pants and he will never admit to any wrongdoing because he believes he’s above the rest of us, and he would never confess to something that would actually put him to shame and covering up paedophilia and sex trafficking is the problem and it won’t go away until all the offenders and anyone defending them are all locked up.

THE FUTURE HAS BEEN ERADICATED

This coronavirus has created three shocks. There’s the health shock, the worst of which should be behind us by the end of this year if Governments handle it well.

There’s the economic shock which will last for considerably longer and there’s the psychological shock which we’ll never get over.

No one who is alive today and old enough to understand what is occurring will ever get over the latter shock and it will mark our lives in a way that only war does. What’s more, this is an event that has happened simultaneously to all eight billion of us on the planet – nothing like this has ever happened to humankind before.

The consequences of these three shocks have been to destroy the future that, on New Year’s day 2020, everyone believed they had, and what happens next is now up to us and this will be a highly contested space.

It will be a contest of interests, beliefs and opinions all trying to shape the policy landscape as we pass through the crisis into its aftermath and it will be a battle between incumbents seeking a way back to their past and innovators embracing the possibility to build back better.

It will be a contest between small state political ideologues who have seen their plan hampered and those for whom the state is back in its proper place.

It will be a battle between those for whom the concept of conflict is the driving energy of human development and those for whom competition unconstrained by cooperation is a prescription for anarchy.

The policy landscape that arises from these contests will define the possibilities for the success or failure of the climate policy and it’s far too soon to see much of that landscape.

This is the time when certainties are dangerous, yet a fog of uncertainties rule.

First, the climate will go on evolving – how much and how fast will depend on the outcome of the contests above, but the nature of our influence on the climate system is such that the future we have already created pauses a while before announcing itself.

And the tide of public concern on the climate in 2019 that found such important global expression in Greta Thunberg and Extinction Rebellion was driven by the public’s growing experience of extreme weather situations.

Public and political awareness is rightly directed elsewhere for the moment but the events that inspired the anxiety will not stop coming and Government’s everywhere will have restoring the economy as their top priority.

This means restoring purchasing power as quickly as possible and a danger for any government bailout programme is that it becomes a bailout to a multitude of other problems.

Inevitably there will be an army of lobbyists seeking to move the all too visible hands of politicians – a pretty clear test then emerges for bailout bids and there will be debt, there’s already debt, now there will be much more debt.

And there will be levels of debt we have only ever encountered before in the aftermath of global war and settling this debt will be the next priority for Governments as they reconstruct their economies.

Here there’s a clear lesson from history. After the first world war, the way chosen to deal with the debt was to reduce public spending. The result was the Depression from which economies were only really rescued by the next war.

After the second world war, the policy choice was to mobilise public investment in creating the welfare state in Britain and the Marshall Plan in Europe.

The resulting productivity improvements meant the market was growing fast by the fifties and the debt was back to controllable levels. Now the need to protect the climate can come to the rescue of our damaged economy by providing, on massive scales, just the productivity-enhancing investments that will push the energy transition to net-zero and heighten confidence in economic recovery.

Gary Lineker Announces He Will Welcome Refugee

Exclusive Match of the Day presenter and former England striker Gary Lineker has agreed to take someone in who has sought asylum via the charity Refugees at Home.

When it comes to television, Gary Linekar is frequently seen as the perfect host and now the Match of the Day presenter is about to entertain guests of a much different kind.

In a few weeks time, he will welcome a refugee to his Surrey home but many would be horrified by the idea of taking a stranger into their home, but he insists it will be fine.

Gary Lineker offered to help through a charity called Refugees at Home but Gary has no idea who he will be welcoming or where they’ve come from.

Before his application is accepted he has to have an interview and home visit by the charity which has helped find interim accommodation for more than 2,250 refugees and asylum seekers.

He was asked if he was worried but he said that he wasn’t at all because he’d had so much connection with refugees over the last couple of years and that he’s met scores of young refugees through football projects and they’re genuinely nice kids and they appreciate any help they can get.

He said that he was sure it would be fine and that he’d been considering doing something like this for a while and he said that his kids are all grown up so he’s got loads of room now, so if he can help on a temporary basis then he’s more than pleased to do so.

He said that he’s got four lads in their 20’s, so he’s used to young men being in the house and that he’s sure that the refugees will behave better than his lot.

Gary Lineker’s comments to refugees led him to make a video for the International Rescue Committee charity on fish and chips. He said it’s not as odd as it sounds and that this most typical of British foods was introduced here in the 16th century by Jewish refugees from Spain and Portugal escaping persecution by the Spanish Inquisition.

And he explained that most of the things we think of as quintessentially British are often brought in from different shores, even St George is Turkish and he just believes that we owe a lot to refugees and that most people are descended from refugees at some point.

And that they’ve given so much to this country and still proceed to do so in terms of the jobs that they do and that we’ve seen throughout the pandemic in the NHS, carers and key workers.

But not everyone is going to agree with him because people out there are saying that they’re illegal immigrants and not refugees.

They come through dozens of safe countries to get to the land of free housing and benefits, with handouts galore. We have always had immigrants come from different lands to England but the difference back then was they were given nothing for free and many had to go to poor shelters and were given slop and had to work extremely hard to get where they wanted to be, there were no handouts then.

Now they’re treated like celebrities while pensioners starve and they get free dental, free medical and now they’re being put up in a celebrity home. But I suppose it is heartwarming to see such concern for the homeless, but what about the homeless of this country?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started