Germany Protests

Thousands of enraged demonstrators flocked to the western city of Giessen, where the hard-right AfD party held its founding convention on Saturday, as the party unveiled its new youth organisation.

Many delegates were delayed in arriving because demonstrators stopped or attempted to block highways entering the city, causing the conference to start more than two hours late.

Dramatic images show protesters clashing with police, who were forced to use pepper spray after stones were thrown at officers in one location, authorities said. 

Police also deployed water cannons to clear a blockade of about 2,000 protesters who ignored calls to disperse.

On Saturday afternoon, they made use of them once more when a group tried to breach barriers surrounding the city’s conference centre.

Up to 5,000 officers were deployed, police said. They estimated more than 25,000 demonstrators had gathered, noting that much of the protest remained peaceful. Ten officers were reported slightly injured. 

When the meeting eventually got underway, AfD officials denounced the protests.

‘What is being done out there – dear left-wingers, dear extremists, you need to look at yourselves – is something that is deeply undemocratic,’ party co-leader Alice Weidel said.

She added that one AfD lawmaker had been attacked. Police confirmed a lawmaker was injured near Giessen but gave no details.

The new youth organisation, named Generation Germany, replaces the Young Alternative – a primarily autonomous group with loose ties to the party – which was formally disbanded in March after AfD cut ties with it.

The party says it wants much tighter oversight of the new body, which will be open to all AfD members under 36. Its statute was approved on Saturday.

AfD finished second in Germany’s national election in February with more than 20 per cent of the vote and is now the largest opposition party.

As Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s coalition fails to gain public trust, the AfD has continued to surge in opinion surveys despite the refusal of mainstream parties to cooperate with it.

Germany’s domestic intelligence agency had previously designated the Young Alternative a proven right-wing extremist group. 

Later, it gave AfD the same designation; however, following a court challenge, that designation was revoked.

A Cologne court ruling last year found that the Young Alternative promoted preserving an ‘ethnically defined German people’ and banning the ‘ethnically foreign’, and pointed to agitation against migrants and ties to extremist movements such as the Identitarian Movement.

Following the dissolution of the Young Alternative, a higher court terminated the appeal procedure in June.

AfD’s other co-leader, Tino Chrupalla, told delegates the party must learn from past mistakes.

‘Some benefited from the young and their ability to mobilise, but didn’t have the future of this youth sufficiently in sight,’ he said.

‘We should have taken more care of the young new hopes in our party; it will be different in future.’

He added that young activists must ‘put themselves at the party’s service’.

In German politics, youth wings are prevalent and frequently more radical than their parent parties. Although much consistency is anticipated, it remains uncertain whether AfD’s new organisation will be more moderate than its predecessor.

These young demonstrators have every right to voice their opposition to the resurgence of fascism in Germany.

But mass migration is intentional, and its prevalence is comparable across all Western nations. The purpose is to wreck the economies; therefore, why in the UK we have seen both placed administrations prove to be totally inept while fleecing the people.

Can you really blame these young individuals, though? No, since nothing will be done about it by our governments.

Countries with mass migration are now deprived because our governments and rich corporations have manipulated us, but now, when we make a stand because we are worried about our future, we are branded ‘extremists’, and young people are now rising because governments are not listening.

People are genuinely frightened, and we are sick of our wives and girlfriends being scared and not being able to walk the streets in case they are attacked by these migrants who have no control over their urges, but this is what happens when our government lays down the welcome mat for everybody to turn up.

Was Marilyn Monroe REALLY murdered after having affairs with President Kennedy and his brother?

They were words that would prove to be quite prophetic.

‘I was the kind of girl they found dead in a hall bedroom with an empty bottle of sleeping pills in her hand.’

That is what Marilyn Monroe, the world’s most celebrated woman, told a journalist in 1954 – eight years before she died in remarkably similar circumstances from a seeming overdose of barbiturates.

More than 60 years on, a cloud of mystery continues to hang over the death of the Hollywood celebrity, model and global sex symbol.

Three times married and three times divorced, Monroe was, in her final weeks, a woman in chaos, an idol defeated by the crushing weight of her own stardom.

But did she really take her own life by overdosing on barbiturates at the age of just 36, or is the reality much darker?

Was she killed for threatening to reveal the secrets of her two most powerful lovers, US President John F. Kennedy and his brother Bobby, the Attorney General?

New book The Last Days of Marilyn Monroe, by mega-selling author James Patterson and co-writer Imogen Edwards-Jones, details the unanswered questions and alleged suspicious circumstances encompassing Monroe’s demise on August 4, 1962.

Monroe allegedly had a ‘violent argument’ with Bobby Kennedy at her home in Los Angeles, California, on the day she died, accusing him of abandoning her.

And Sergeant Jack Clemmons, the policeman who came to Monroe’s home after she was found dead, said it was ‘the most obviously staged death scene I had ever seen’.

Further, in a 1985 interview on the BBC with investigative journalist Anthony Summers, Monroe’s housekeeper Eunice Murray, who found her dead, had said cryptically words to the effect of, ‘Why do I have to keep covering this up’.

As for her post-mortem, that was not done by the chief medical examiner but instead carried out by a junior counterpart, who subsequently revealed that he did not do the entire range of organ tests that would normally have been expected.

Hinting that there may have been foul play, Patterson said in a recent interview with the Hollywood Reporter: ‘I think that she was treading in very dangerous waters.

‘She had these incredible relationships with President Kennedy, and with Robert Kennedy, and with [Frank] Sinatra, and with Mafia figures.

‘They told her stuff, and she kept track of it. She had information that was kind of dangerous.’

He added: ‘I didn’t know much about the death scene, about the autopsy not being as complete as it should have been, that one of the detectives was convinced the scene was staged.’

News of the death of Monroe, the star of films including Some Like It Hot and a bedroom pin-up for millions of young men, was front-page news worldwide.

In his tribute, acting titan Sir Laurence Olivier, who starred alongside Monroe in his 1957 romantic comedy The Prince and the Showgirl, spoke for many.

‘Marilyn was the complete victim of ballyhoo and sensationalism,’ he said.

‘She could be incredibly sweet, most tenderly appealing and very, very witty.

‘Her end is dreadfully and shockingly sad, but popular opinion and all that goes to promote it is a horribly unsteady conveyance for life, and she was exploited beyond anyone’s means.’

The last several months of Monroe’s life had been turbulent and humiliating.

The star had, for years, been dependent on a cocktail of drugs, was chronically depressed and had undergone surgery for endometriosis.

In May 1962, she made international headlines and sparked a surge of affair speculation when she serenaded President Kennedy at his 45th birthday celebrations at Madison Square Garden.

The following month, Monroe – now notorious for her perceived lack of professionalism – was sacked from the production of Something’s Got to Give, which would turn out to be the last film she worked on.

Much of the suspicion surrounding Monroe’s demise hinges on the claims of former vice detective Fred Otash, who said he was ordered to conceal a surveillance microphone in the star’s house.

The original tapes of the alleged recorded conversations were said to have gone missing soon after Monroe was discovered dead.

According to Otash, the tapes prove that Bobby Kennedy went with his brother-in-law, the English actor Peter Lawford, to Monroe’s home on the day she died.

There, according to Patterson’s account of Otash’s claims, a ‘highly emotional’ Monroe demanded ‘an explanation as to why Kennedy was not going to marry her’.

‘According to Otash, it is “a violent argument about their relationship and the commitment and promises Bobby made to her. She said she was passed around like a piece of meat.”

Kennedy was then alleged to have lost his temper and said he would not leave until he got Monroe’s ‘little red book, where she kept all her notes about “political things” she discussed with him and, before him, his brother.’ 

Otash reported: ‘She was screaming. Bobby gets the pillow, and he muffles her on the bed to keep the neighbours from hearing. 

‘She finally quieted down, and then he was looking to get out of there.’

Monroe then allegedly took some pills to calm down before having rambling phone conversations about “betrayals… men in high places… clandestine love affairs.”

She was said to have told one caller: ‘I know a lot of secrets about the Kennedys. Dangerous ones.’

To another, she claimed to have news that ‘will one day shock the whole world’.

Monroe was supposed to have dinner at Lawford’s home on the night she passed away. 

However, the star’s slurred speech, which sounded like she was high, startled him when he called her later.

She cryptically told him: ‘Say goodbye to Pat, say goodbye to the president, and say goodbye to yourself, because you’re a nice guy.’

In the early hours of August 5, Monroe’s housekeeper woke abruptly, worried that something was not right.

Mrs Murray tried to enter her boss’s room after getting out of bed, but she discovered the door was locked.

She called Dr Ralph Greenson, Monroe’s psychiatrist, now quite concerned.

Mrs Murray then looked through Monroe’s bedroom window, according to her version of events.

There she saw the star on her bed, lying naked on her back. Her hand was still holding her telephone.

Dr Greenson then arrived, broke the window with a poker and climbed into Monroe’s bedroom. 

Revealing what happened next, Patterson writes: ‘He leans over Marilyn and presses gently on the side of her slim neck. Please, God, let there be a pulse. 

‘He presses harder. The flesh feels tepid, not as warm as he would like. Maybe there is something? There! Then he realises it’s his own pounding heartbeat. 

“We’ve lost her!” he cries out, his knees buckling beneath him.’

Dr Greenson then saw the numerous pill bottles and a trail of white tablets on the carpet. A 50-capsule bottle of the sedative Nembutal was empty. 

One pill every night is the typical dosage.

Sergeant Clemmons arrived shortly before 5 am. When he examined Monroe’s body, he was instantly suspicious.

The new book continues: ‘Marilyn’s legs are perfectly straight. Her face is buried in a pillow. He’d like to get a look at her mouth, check for signs of foam or vomit. 

‘Suicides are usually messier than this. The normal signs of distress or struggle are not present.’

Speaking of why he believed the scene was staged, he said: ‘The pill bottles on her table had been arranged in neat order, and the body was deliberately positioned.’ 

Although Sergeant Clemmons was later criticised for being an unreliable witness, Mrs Murray’s account was also contested.

When she spoke with Summers in 1985, she was asked what she meant when she said words to the effect of, ‘Why do I have to keep covering this up?’

She replied: ‘Well, of course Bobby Kennedy was there.’

Summers said of the conversation: ‘I asked her what she meant, and she then astonished us by admitting that Robert Kennedy had indeed visited Marilyn on the day she died, and that a doctor and an ambulance had come while she was still alive.

‘It became so sticky that the protectors of Robert Kennedy, you know, had to step in and protect him…’

Dr Thomas Noguchi performed Monroe’s post-mortem rather than his more experienced colleague.

Patterson and Ms Edward-Jones write of Dr Noguchi: ‘He detects neither needle marks, indicating a drug injection, nor signs of physical violence. 

‘The autopsy confirms blood toxic with barbiturates and a stomach empty of food particles, even the yellow dye that coats Nembutal capsules.

‘But he never performs the full range of organ tests. He admits later: “I didn’t follow through as I should have.”

It was later claimed that Dr Greenson prescribed Monroe a chloral hydrate enema and that it was this medication, when mixed with Nembutal, that killed her.

Then, according to the claim, Dr Greenson and Dr Hyman Engelberg, Monroe’s personal physician, staged the star’s death as suicide amid fear of the consequences should they be blamed for her death. 

However, the allegations that Monroe was killed to prevent her from discussing the Kennedy brothers have persisted.

In a 1995 interview, Monroe’s close friend Sidney Guilaroff said he had spoken to her on the phone just hours before she died.

‘Marilyn telephoned me and was in an absolute state. She said, “Bobby Kennedy was here, and he threatened me, screamed at me, and pushed me around!”

‘I think I said something like “What was Robert Kennedy doing at your house?”, because I couldn’t believe my ears.

‘I knew absolutely nothing about her affair with Bobby, and I thought I knew everything. 

‘I knew about Jack, but then she told me she’d had an affair with Bobby as well.

‘Everything had gone wrong. Now she was afraid and felt she was in terrible danger.

‘Bobby felt she had become a problem and had said to her: “If you threaten me, Marilyn, there’s more than one way to keep you quiet.”

Sinatra himself is said to have been convinced that Monroe had been murdered.

Tony Oppedisano, his former manager and close friend, wrote in his 2021 memoir: ‘Frank believed she was murdered, and he never got over it.’

However, in the 1980s, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office opened an inquiry into Monroe’s death as unanswered questions stirred.

The then district attorney, John Van de Kamp, told the Los Angeles Times: ‘Based on the evidence available to us, it appears that her death could have been a suicide or a result of an accidental drug overdose.’

Investigators at the time said murder would have required a ‘massive, in place conspiracy’ that would have involved, ‘the actual killer or killers; the chief medical examiner coroner; the autopsy surgeon to whom the case was fortuitously assigned; and most all of the police officers assigned to the case, as well as their superiors.’

The authorities added: ‘Our inquiries and document examination uncovered no credible evidence supporting a murder theory.’

Many people thought Marilyn Monroe had been murdered, and since not everyone could be mistaken, someone had to be correct. After all, she was quite knowledgeable about a number of powerful individuals.

If she was threatening to expose both the Kennedy brothers, what was she going to disclose? It must have been something worth killing for.

Was there really any uncertainty, after all? Frank Sinatra mingled with a lot of shady characters while he was alive, so if he thought she was murdered, then perhaps she was, but we will never really know for sure; it’s just all conjecture, and always will be.

Somebody, or many, knew the truth, but if it was the Kennedy’s they had to be protected. In this day and age, it frankly makes Clinton and Trump look like choirboys.

Marilyn was, of course, an incredibly troubled woman, and she was taken advantage of by powerful men. Once they’d finished playing with her, and had no use for her anymore, she had to go, although she could have sold her story for a lot of money, but all she really wanted was to be loved. However, humans can be evil monsters; it’s that simple, they take what they want and then toss it away.

DWP Is Scrapping Benefits

The Department for Work and Pensions intends to visit the homes of thousands of claimants to advise them that one benefit will be eliminated.

Employment and Support Allowance claimants will switch to Universal Credit under the controlled migration program. Claimants usually have three months from the date of the notice to file their application after obtaining a Migration Notice; after that, benefits stop.

The DWP has promised, nonetheless, that it would not end ESA without contacting claimants once more. The DWP Visiting Team will be in touch to arrange a visit and give information about what to anticipate, including contact information. A letter of confirmation will be sent out, but if the visit is planned at short notice, it can happen before the letter gets there.

If the visit is to take place at your home and you’ve supplied a mobile number, the team will also confirm the booking through text message. Before the visit, the DWP Visiting Team will provide details about the date and time of the visit, which can be rescheduled if necessary.

They will also notify you of the location of the visit, how to reach the Visiting Team, who will be visiting you, provide the visiting officer’s name, what identification documents you’ll need to give before the visit can commence, and security and safety measures for the visit.

They will also guide you on what information you need to provide to the DWP about your income, savings and health, reports Birmingham Live. The duration of these support visits can vary, and it’s not possible to predict how long each visit will take.

If you have any queries, you can contact the DWP Visiting Team before the visit. The DWP explains: “The visiting officer will present their photo identity card upon arrival. You can then verify if the visiting officer named in the letter you received about the visit is the same person.

“If you are unable to check their photo identity card (for example, due to a visual impairment), you can agree on a password for the visiting officer to use when they arrive. This needs to be arranged before the visit by contacting the DWP Visiting Team.

“You can also confirm their identity by calling the number provided in the letter or text message, and providing the visiting officer’s name.”

It simply becomes more and more daft. We are all aware that some people attempt to circumvent the system, but they will undoubtedly never be discovered. This is similar to the days of the National Assistant, when they would unexpectedly drop by and accuse you of working if you didn’t answer the door because you were sick or merely out shopping.

And who is footing the bill for all these door-knockers? The taxpayer, of course. I would advise the DWP to go knock on the hotels first and deal with those who have arrived by boat.

People are coming over on boats and receiving handout after handout, but sadly, the majority of them seem to be either involved in crime or send all of their money back to their families in their home countries. It seems to me that the sick, disabled, and elderly are treated as a burden on society and surplus to requirements.

Patients With Fibromyalgia Are Left In Agony

Sufferers of a chronic pain condition are being left in agony because of a ‘cruel’ prohibition on drugs by NHS chiefs, campaigners have claimed.

Fibromyalgia patients – who endure body-wide pain, muscle stiffness and headaches – had been offered strong painkillers, including pregabalin and tramadol. But recent guidance on the management of chronic pain by the NHS spending watchdog, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), has banned their use.

Patients are also being denied NHS-approved non-drug therapies that are proven to work, including a water-based treatment called hydrotherapy, as local health chiefs won’t fund it, claims Des Quinn, chair of Fibromyalgia Action UK.

He claims that a change in NHS rules regarding painkillers is a ‘major step backwards in the treatment of fibromyalgia’.

Mr Quinn adds: ‘Patients’ quality of life is being reduced as a result. Drugs such as tramadol are backed by good scientific evidence, which NICE failed to consider.’

It is not known what causes fibromyalgia, which affects more than two million people in the UK. The condition tends to develop between the ages of 25 and 55 and, alongside pain, patients report difficulty concentrating and digestive problems.

There is presently no treatment, and some research indicates that it may be brought on by an illness, an accident, or a time of mental stress.

Pop sensation Lady Gaga and Oscar-winning actor Morgan Freeman are two well-known victims.

Before 2021, NICE had no clear guidelines for fibromyalgia, but told doctors to follow the rules for nerve pain. These recommended that patients were offered painkillers, including the now-barred drugs.

A report by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology concluded that the balance of evidence was in favour of the use of medications such as pregabalin and tramadol.

However, increasing numbers of Britons becoming addicted to these painkillers – as well as a concern that they were not effective in all patients – forced health chiefs to crack down on prescriptions.

One of Britain’s top fibromyalgia specialists, Dr Deepak Ravindran of the Royal Berkshire Hospital, says the banned painkillers are being held to too high a standard.

He also adds that a wider range of treatments should be available because the causes of fibromyalgia are so diverse. Other permitted treatments include exercise plans and cognitive behavioural therapy. Hydrotherapy should also be offered to help improve musculoskeletal symptoms, but patients are finding it increasingly difficult to gain access to a pool due to closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the NHS is failing those who suffer from fibromyalgia, a chronic pain illness. According to a recent study, individuals were administered dangerous medications, underwent needless testing, and waited years for a diagnosis.

Researchers at Aberdeen University said some doctors were even refusing to refer patients and dismissing them as “lazy”.

The senior consultant who conducted the UK-wide research is now calling on the NHS to overhaul its care of fibromyalgia patients.

The Scottish government said it would continue to work closely with the NHS to improve how services are accessed and delivered.

Fibromyalgia causes pain all over the body and can bring on extreme exhaustion, and some estimates suggest one in 20 people may have the illness.

By sharing their own stories, celebrities like singer Lady Gaga and journalist Kirsty Young have brought attention to the problem. There isn’t a treatment.

For those who have it, fibromyalgia is a daily battle.

For most, they start with a daily cocktail of painkillers for chronic full-body pain, fatigue and brain fog, and it’s truly hard to put in a box because it’s different every day. It’s muscular pain that can be dull or throbbing, and it can be really intense as well, like somebody jabbing you with a screwdriver, and it’s burning.

Most people stress about what the remainder of their lives is going to be like.

For most, the mornings are slow because they’re trying to realise how they are feeling at that point – what they’ve got to do in that day, and what they can call off if it is extremely bad.

Some people claim that having fibromyalgia hurts worse than giving birth.

There are days when these people are in so much pain, they don’t move off the sofa, apart from going to the bathroom.

Many are on extremely strong painkillers and medications, including Tramadol, but even that doesn’t stop all the pain – next stop, Morphine.

However, there are many people, including doctors, who doubt Fibromyalgia. All I can say about this is if you don’t believe these people are extremely sick, then I seriously hope you don’t ever have to walk a step in their shoes, because quite frankly, it really is no fun at all.

There is no miracle cure for Fibromyalgia; it’s just all a guessing game, and sometimes it’s easier to vilify an illness that you know nothing about than to agree it actually exists, because then the experts would have to do something about it.

People suffer because of this debilitating illness – there is no cure, they know that, but sometimes it’s just nice to know that somebody is listening instead of dismissing.

Should Rachel Reeves Resign?

Rachel Reeves encountered enraged calls to resign last night after being accused of ‘lying’ to the nation in the run-up to the Budget.

The Chancellor was informed months ago that there was no gap in the public finances, the fiscal watchdog disclosed Wednesday in an unusual step.

But even before her announcement on Wednesday, Ms Reeves had been issuing dire warnings about the state of the economy.

She even opened the door to an income tax hike in an unprecedented early-morning speech, all while plotting a mammoth welfare giveaway in her ‘Benefits Street Budget’.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the Office for Budget Responsibility’s revelation showed Ms Reeves had ‘lied to the public’ and she should be sacked.

Now you can have your say on the Chancellor’s position in the Daily Mail’s latest poll of the day. 

Rachel Reeves should most definitely resign – she has lied to us all, and she is the worst Chancellor ever! However, it’s not just Reeves that has lied, the whole damn lot of them lie all the time – they should all resign and a General Election should be called for.

Perhaps she should go to jail, directly to jail without collecting any money, but of course, she won’t because the gravy train is far too attractive, and what irritates me the most is that after all the damage she has done, the amount of businesses she has helped to close, and the amount of financial distress she has piled onto so many people, she will simply waltz off into the sunset, a multmillionaire with an enormous pension.

All government employees should be sacked if they have been proven to have deceived or lied, full stop, and she should be sacked.

With Labour, lying appears to be the norm; even if the truth were to strike them in the face, they wouldn’t recognise it.

Politics in this country is broken, not because disagreements exist, but because accountability doesn’t.

Leaders who view the truth as a responsibility rather than an annoyance are what the public deserves, and we urgently need a full debate in the House of Commons on honesty and integrity in public life.

Our elected officials have no right to lecture the rest of us about responsibility if they are unable to uphold the most basic requirement of being truthful.

The deterioration of trust in politics is not an accident; it’s the inescapable consequence of a culture where evasion is rewarded, scrutiny is circumvented, and ‘politicking’ has become a justification for behaviour that would get anyone else sacked.

Rachel Reeves is a loose cannon who laughs in the face of respectable people while attempting to deceive.

Teenager Dies In Swamp After Being Tied Up

A teenager died after she was tied up and tossed into a swamp to drown in an honour killing because her Western behaviour disgraced her family, according to prosecutors in the Netherlands. 

Ryan Al Najjar’s father, who is suspected of orchestrating the murder, left the country to return to Syria, while her siblings are currently on trial for her murder.

Mohamed, 23, and Muhanad Al Najjar, 25, are charged with taking part in the horrendous crime against their 18-year-old sister, whose body was discovered gagged with her hands bound behind her back, ankles taped together, and submerged in a swamp six days after she disappeared from the family home in Joure. 

Their father, Khaled, will be tried in absentia. Ryan vanished on 22 May 2024. A passerby found her body on 28 May in Lelystad, approximately 25 miles north-east of Amsterdam. 

Later, investigators discovered her father’s DNA under her fingernails, suggesting that she had resisted.

Dutch prosecutors say Ryan was murdered because she had a boyfriend, behaved in a way her family considered ‘Western,’ and had ‘shamed’ them. 

Her murder was officially classified as an honour crime by the Public Prosecution Service.

The brothers, whose trial began yesterday, insist they were not involved and say their father carried out the murder alone. 

According to reports, Khaled claimed responsibility and denied his sons’ guilt in two emails to the Dutch daily De Telegraaf. However, the prosecution denied such an assertion.

They claim that the father told his sons to collect Ryan, drive her to a remote area, and throw her into the water while she was gagged and weighed down. 

The prosecution says the brothers carried out the plan knowing she would die.

Ryan was protected and under police surveillance before her death, but that ceased before her murder. The reason for the termination of her protection has not been disclosed.

Both brothers were arrested soon after the body was discovered and have remained in custody since then. Their father escaped the country and has not been tracked down.

According to the Dutch current-affairs programme Nieuwsuur, Khaled is believed to be living in northern Syria and has remarried since the killing.

The Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security told the programme that the Netherlands currently has no way to secure his return. 

‘The possibilities for criminal cooperation with Syria are currently not available,’ the Ministry said. ‘The criminal justice authorities required for this cooperation are not yet operational in Syria.’

That’s it in a nutshell. We are supposed to coexist with these individuals, who think that Western conduct is so deplorable as to be murderous, but if our way of life is so abhorrent to them, why the hell would they even choose to live in the Western world? And when will our governments see the light? Or is this the evidence that our leaders prefer to ignore?

And if this man has fled to go back to Syria, then it can’t be that dangerous – we are being deceived daily by people entering our countries.

Our governments no longer represent us, so why do we need a government at all?

It was murder, plain and simple; it was not an honour killing, and the father has no concept of what honour is when he flees and leaves his sons to face the music – he’s just a coward!

May all of those other girls who have been viciously and cold-bloodedly killed by the very families that were supposed to love and protect them rest in peace.

In the twenty-first century, this is toxic, out-of-date religious rubbish that the West could do without.

Cuddles For Harry And Meghan

Prince Harry embraced Meghan publicly to show unity after PR challenges.

The couple has now shared images of themselves nestling at Our Big Kitchen Los Angeles, where they were preparing meals for the needy and hungry to be delivered on Thanksgiving Day.

‘Harry has his arms around Meghan to stress their closeness after recent controversies,’ a royal source told the Daily Mail today. 

It came after a PR problem sparked by their attendance at Kris Jenner’s 70th birthday, a row over denied accusations that the Duchess had been taking dresses from cover shoots without approval and adverse headlines linked to Meghan’s recent Harper’s Bazaar cover story.

The new image, posted by their Archewell foundation with the captions ‘Show up, do good’ and ‘Honouring the season through service’, showed a grinning Harry behind his wife, wrapping his arms around her tightly.

Meghan, surrounded by a sizable group of Our Big Kitchen employees and volunteers, is also grinning widely as she takes her husband’s hand and leans back into him.

Another royal insider told the Daily Mail today that the warm image was ‘very telling’ given the events of recent weeks – and suggested the engagement was clearly inspired by events carried out more regularly by the Prince and Princess of Wales with their children George, Charlotte and Louis.

The source added: ‘Harry is clearly very protective of his wife. They look very happy and close.’

Another source said the choice of image was a show of defiance and family – and a sign that they remain rooted in the US as a couple. 

‘These are pictures that say everything about the Sussexes: an all-American event celebrating Thanksgiving, but a highly curated image issued after the visit via social media. They want to control their image and avoid dealing directly with the US press,’ the expert said.

‘One of the main reasons that Harry and Meghan lost the support of much of the British public was the feeling that they wanted it all ways. They want to be treated like royalty, keep royal titles for themselves and their children, but avoid much of the attention and scrutiny that goes with it.

‘Thanksgiving is all about families getting together. So naturally, the kids are there, but the public doesn’t get to see the faces of Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, the sixth and seventh in line to the throne’.

The Sussexes went to Our Big Kitchen Los Angeles with their children, who were involved in making cookies. A smiling Meghan held hands with Lilibet, who wore a tartan dress and had her hair in a braid, and watched on as Harry dished up a meal of mince, rice and peppers into a Tupperware box.

The charity event came after Harry and Meghan’s travels to Kris Jenner’s 70th birthday party at Jeff Bezos’ mansion backfired after images of them partying inside were mysteriously deleted by the birthday girl and her daughter, Kim Kardashian, making headlines around the world.

Many people argue that this was a publicity stunt. Whether it was fabricated or not, Harry appeared to be content with his life and his wife, and of course, we can’t foresee the future, but some people out there figure they are Nostradamus!

What will happen to Harry and Meghan is unknown. They appear cheerful, but appearances may be misleading. But I hope the future is bright for them.

Harry has this reputation of being hen-pecked by his controlling wife, and somehow, I don’t really believe that. He has ginger hair, and we all know that ginger people have very fiery tempers, or do they?

If you’re a natural redhead, you’ve presumably heard some sort of stereotype about yourself. In fact, I would put money on it. However, these stereotypes are loosely founded on ancient myths and obsolete societal beliefs, but apparently, some stereotypical traits have been linked to redheads, which have been fused with our genetics. However, this still doesn’t make it true.

Misery Smorgasbord

Kemi Badenoch criticised Rachel Reeves as the ‘country’s worst Chancellor’ for the chaotic recent Budget, and the Conservative leader criticised the Chancellor’s handling of leaks and U-turns in a strong Commons performance.

Ms Badenoch criticised Labour’s economic plan, labelling it a ‘Budget for Benefit Street’ due to increased taxes on houses, cars, and pensions.

To cheers from the Tory back benches, she said that Ms Reeves ‘will go down as the country’s worst ever Chancellor’, as she described her speech as an ‘exercise in self-delusion’.

‘If she had any decency, she would resign,’ she told the Commons.

The Conservative leader said that the Chancellor has ‘chosen to put up tax after tax, after tax’, with the Office for Budget Responsibility showing that the tax-to-GDP ratio is set to increase to a post-war high of 38.3 per cent of GDP in 2030-31.

Ms Badenoch told the Commons: ‘Taxes on workers, taxes on savers, taxes on pensions, taxes on investors, taxes on homes, holidays, cars, I think even milkshakes, taxes on anyone doing the right thing.

‘She and this Government have lost what little credibility they have left, and no one will ever trust her again.’

Ms Badenoch said that ‘Labour have lost control of welfare spending’ and dubbed it a ‘Budget for Benefit Street’, with spending on sickness and disability benefits set to jump to £109 billion by 2030-31 in a move that would see spending on Britain’s welfare state surpass £400 billion.

‘The Labour Party should be renamed the Welfare Party,’ she joked.

The Tory leader said the Budget can be ‘summed up in one sentence’, that ‘Labour are hiking taxes to pay for welfare’.

She added: ‘This is Labour’s Britain… People who work hard and save hard to buy their homes get taxed more, while those who don’t work, who in some cases refuse to work, get their accommodation paid for by taxpayers.

‘To top it all off, because taxing your home, your car, your savings and your pension wasn’t enough. She has, by her own admission, broken her manifesto promise on income tax.’

In an acerbic speech, Ms Badenoch dubbed the Chancellor and Prime Minister ‘Laurel and Foolhardy’ and repeatedly hit back at Ms Reeves’ claims that criticism of her Budget is ‘sexist’.

She added: ‘People out there aren’t complaining because she’s female, they’re complaining because she is utterly incompetent.

‘Real equality means being held to the same standard as everyone else. It means being judged on results.’

Ms Badenoch added: ‘This Budget could have saved £47 billion, including £23 billion from welfare. She could have applied our golden economic rule, allocating half of those savings to cutting the deficit, using the rest to cut taxes.

‘She could have abolished stamp duty on homes to get the housing market moving, abolished business rates on shops to breathe life into our High Streets. She could have introduced our cheap power plan, which saves a lot more than she announced.

‘She should be on the side of people who get up and go to work, people who take a risk to start a company, people working all hours to keep their business afloat, she should be on the side of the farmer trying to hand something over to the next generation, the investor deciding whether to spend their money in the UK or elsewhere.

‘She should be on the side of the young person looking for their first job, the saver doing the right thing and putting money away for a rainy day, the pensioner trying to enjoy a decent retirement. This country works when you make the country work for them. Only the Conservatives are on their side, and our plan for them is simple: bring down energy costs, cut spending, cut tax, back business and get Britain working again.’

Kemi Badenoch’s speech highlighted Rachel Reeves’ unsuitability as Chancellor.

She impressed by humorously criticising Rachel Reeves and Labour – a surprising but excellent performance, and I might not be her greatest fan, however, she was extremely remarkable with her address, in fact, flawless, and if she keeps up the good work, I might even change my mind about her.

Outrage Grows Over Lab-Made ‘Franken-Milk’ Arriving In US Stores

Lab-grown milk faces resistance before US store debut.

Dubbed UnReal Milk, the new beverage is not produced by real animals, but comes from large lab tanks called bioreactors that use special animal cells which produce the same proteins, fats, and carbs found in regular cow’s milk.

Brown Foods aims to launch UnReal Milk in US stores by 2026, currently conducting public taste tests.

The company can sell its milk as it uses GRAS ingredients and affirms its safety data.

Many new food companies choose this route instead of waiting for full FDA approval.

Sohail Gupta, co-founder of Brown Foods, told Forbes that with their technology, they can produce milk from any mammal species, including human milk.

The announcement of a cow’s milk that doesn’t actually come from cows has been met with scepticism by many on social media, including some calling on lawmakers to outlaw the product before it even goes on sale.

‘Ban that c*** now,’ one person on X wrote.

‘I want nothing to do with this “lab-grown garbage” I don’t trust these biotech mad men and women!’ another person declared.

Brown Foods and scientists testing UnReal Milk at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) said the product is better for the planet than cow’s milk because it cuts greenhouse gases, uses less water to produce, and needs less land than traditional dairy farming.

Supporters of lab-grown drink argue it’s reliable due to immunity to factors like droughts, cow illnesses, and supply issues, suggesting it could aid in feeding populations where cows can’t thrive.

Critics, including dairy farmers and nutrition experts, argue that long-term studies have yet to prove lab-grown whole milk’s health benefits compared to cow’s milk, especially for children.

Board-certified family physician Dr Kat Lindley took to X after it was announced that UnReal Milk would go on sale next year and simply replied: ‘NO!’

‘Good grief, they’re willing to process all our food under the guise of climate change. Disgusting,’ one commentator replied.

Critics say UnReal Milk is a lab-grown product backed by billionaire Bill Gates.

Gates has previously backed foods and drinks created to allegedly decarbonise the food and agriculture sector via his company Breakthrough Energy Ventures (BEV).

The Daily Mail has not confirmed Gates supporting UnReal Milk; we await comment from Brown Foods.

Most milk alternatives are plant-based drinks made from almond, oat, soy, coconut, pea, and rice proteins.

If it doesn’t come from the cow’s udders, then it’s simply not milk; it is artificial milk.

I love milk, but wouldn’t drink lab-grown products. But as long as it’s marked UnReal milk, then let people buy it and consume it, but it wouldn’t be for me, and the trouble is, it won’t be marked as UnReal milk, and regulations should be put in place to caution customers of any lab-grown product that it’s not real.

Let Bill Gates drink it, but then, on the other hand, he probably would.

UnReal milk may trend, but could become a fad like fake meat – not a wise long-term investment.

I’m okay with alternatives, but lab-grown products might have unknown risks like cancer, and you would think that these laboratories would spend more time trying to find a cure for cancer than creating artificial foods – it’s just a waste of time and money, but let’s face it they will never discover a cure for cancer because there’s more money to be made in keeping people sick.

Princess Of Wales Urges Compassion For Addiction Battles

Princess of Wales urges compassion for those battling addiction.

Catherine highlighted fear, shame, and judgment in society’s addiction experience, urging open dialogues to address the issue.

The message is for Addiction Awareness Week, running from November 23 to November 30.

Kate supports the Forward Trust, a charity helping recovering addicts.

An IPSOS survey for the trust found that most adults have dealt with dependency themselves or know someone who has.

The royal emphasised that addiction is a mental health condition deserving empathy and support, yet stigma persists.

The stigma of addiction thrives in secrecy, affecting families, communities, and lives, with many knowing someone in its grip.

This is the time to express compassion and guide them to seek support from organisations like The Forward Trust.

Kate, who initiated the 2021 Addiction Awareness Week, highlighted the importance of starting with a caring conversation to make recovery possible.

‘So please join the conversation. By talking about it in the open, together we can bring addiction and the harm it causes out of the shadows.’

She added: ‘We can reframe this issue with kindness and understanding, and we can help individuals and families coping with addiction know they are not alone.’

Former England and Arsenal captain Tony Adams, now a recovered alcoholic and chairman at the Forward Trust, shared a video launching a film series.

He urged, ‘If you are struggling with an addiction or a mental health issue, then please reach out and get the appropriate help. The greatest thing I ever did was to say, “I can’t do this.”

The IPSOS survey is part of the campaign to address addiction stigma, launched by Kate in 2021.

In October, 53% of 2,124 people surveyed had addiction experience.

Among those who experienced addiction, around half felt uncomfortable discussing it with their employer, while fewer were comfortable talking to family, friends, their GP, or partner.

31% agreed addicts’ self-blame, but 41% disagreed.

The poll found 81 per cent of those surveyed agreed that those addicted or dependent on alcohol, drugs, medication or gambling should be treated as individuals who are struggling and need help.

Kate, while not betrayed by an addict, has seen similar destructive behaviour, possibly stemming from emotional addiction rather than substance abuse.

Kate appears to be an extremely pleasant lady, but if you’ve grown up with drunks, it can make that person less understanding than perhaps they should be.

Kate’s efforts are admirable, but understanding addiction’s depth requires experience; offering love, kindness, and compassion often can’t prevent despair.

Addiction poses a serious, chaotic, and defeating challenge despite our efforts.

Kate missed her mark on the campaign due to a lack of understanding, and talk is cheap, and it’s easy to preach compassion when you live in an ivory tower, and it’s very doubtful that she will ever be raped, robbed, assaulted or murdered by a drunken crackhead.

Here she is in her little bubble. She’s never going to be mugged by a junkie or endure the attentions of a drunk, yet she tells us how we should react. I wonder what we are going to do with her invaluable advice?

I wish the Royals would stop lecturing us.

She is absolutely clueless. Perhaps she should spend time with people who are addicts, and whose lives have been ruined by lies, stealing and threats. No amount of love will help an addict; they need to want to do it for themselves, and sometimes trying to protect them and support them is counterproductive. Aside from that, there just aren’t enough services available to meet the demand.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started