Digital ID Will Be Unveiled At Labour’s Conference

Sir Keir Starmer is expected to unveil plans to introduce digital identification cards for people living in the UK at the Labour Party conference this month. 

The PM has been ‘exploring’ the idea in recent weeks and, while finer details of the scheme are allegedly still being ironed out, an announcement could come as early as the annual meet, which starts on September 28. 

Starmer is determined to plough ahead with the scheme, which is part of efforts to overhaul the country’s asylum and immigration system, according to a report by the Financial Times.

In addition to dealing with the burden of hosting tens of thousands of asylum seekers, the Labour administration is under pressure to reduce the record number of migrants arriving in tiny boats over the Channel.

One option under consideration would give digital IDs to all people legally entitled to reside in Britain, whether citizens or those with legal immigration status, a source briefed on the matter told the newspaper.

The digital ID could be used for employment verification and rental agreements, though the government may still narrow the scope or revisit the plan, they added. 

Earlier this month, the PM said that digital IDs could ‘play an important part’ in making Britain less attractive to illegal migrants.

However, critics of the scheme warned it could turn the country into a ‘dystopian nightmare’ if people are forced into ID checks ‘to go about our everyday lives’. 

Rebecca Vincent, of Big Brother Watch, said earlier this month: ‘While Downing Street is scrambling to be seen as doing something about illegal immigration, we are sleepwalking into a dystopian nightmare where the entire population will be forced through myriad digital checkpoints to go about our everyday lives.

‘Mandatory digital ID… will not stop small boat crossings, but it will create a burden on the already law-abiding population to prove our right to be here.

‘It will turn Britain into a “Papers, please” society.’

Meanwhile, Gracie Bradley of Liberty said a new scheme was ‘likely to be even more intrusive, insecure and discriminatory’ than the Labour government’s failed 2006 plan to bring in ID cards. 

Former Labour prime minister Tony Blair’s nascent card scheme was discarded by the incoming Coalition government in 2010.

Ms Bradley added that an ‘expensive and unjustified ID scheme… threatens our rights’.

Conservative justice spokesman Robert Jenrick also criticised the proposal earlier this month. He said, ‘Most employers who are employing individuals illegally are doing so knowingly.

‘Asking them to check ID cards rather than the current checks that they are already obliged to do is not going to make a blind bit of difference to illegal migration.’

A government spokesperson said Britain was committed to expanding the use of technology to make it easier for people to access services, pointing to existing systems such as e-visas and the NHS app.

‘We will look at any serious proposals that would help people access public services, including digital ID,’ the spokesperson said in a statement.

This is going to be another waste of money, and to think that Keir Starmer doesn’t know how to stop the boats from coming across from France, or doesn’t want to, given all the money that is spent annually.

If he wanted to stop the boats, he would find a way, but this is a manipulative move to introduce ID cards on the back of people’s outrage over mass immigration.

This is simply another tool for the government to monitor us, which is why they are so interested in AI.

If our government wanted to keep children safe, they would do so by eliminating the grooming gangs who are now operating in most towns and cities. But our government just wants to silence us.

He must think we are all extremely foolish because he thinks we think he will solve the problem when we know better. All Starmer does is make excuses and tell us any lies he can to destroy us and our identities.

He evidently doesn’t see migration as a problem, but what he does see as a problem is our complaining, but we have every right to complain.

Simply put, Starmer is tinkering around the edges while at the same time diminishing our freedoms, and that’s not okay at all.

ONE OUT, HUNDREDS IN

Channel people smuggler warns 2,000 asylum seekers could be sent to Britain EVERY DAY using larger vessels in an industry now worth ‘hundreds of millions’

Sir Keir Starmer’s ‘one-in, one-out scheme’ has no likelihood of discouraging Channel migrants unless it is significantly scaled up, it was claimed today. 

The second migrant was successfully exiled to France as part of the deal – only for hundreds more to set off in dinghies from a beach near Calais. 

Rob Lawrie, a former soldier who has been speaking to people smugglers for a new podcast, insisted the scheme was too small-scale to be a deterrent. 

One people smuggler he spoke to suggested 2,000 migrants would have to be returned every week to persuade more from crossing – but even if that happens, more would continue to come from France in new bigger boats. 

‘I was talking to a smuggler in Germany last week who said the UK needs to be sending back at least 2,000 a week – and even if that happened, they could send 2,000 more a day the other way,’ he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

‘It’s that much money involved in the people smuggling network… I’m talking hundreds of millions.

‘He also pointed out that down the line – ”next season”, he called it – they’re introducing 18-metre boats. We’ve had one this year with 132 migrants on board.

‘I understand this is a pilot scheme, but in order for this to be effective, they need to have about two to three thousand migrants a week heading to France – and even that won’t meet the number of migrants coming across the Channel.’

This morning, at least three dinghies were observed leaving Calais’ Gravelines beach for the sea, and hours later, Border Force pulled migrants ashore at Dover.

Around the same time, the Eritrean was escorted on an Air France flight that left Heathrow for Paris at 6.39 am. 

In a last-minute legal challenge, the man’s lawyers had endeavoured to temporarily thwart his removal by arguing he was an ‘alleged trafficking victim’.

However, his effort was unsuccessful, and this morning he reached France. After three days in legal uncertainty, the first migrant deported under the scheme—an Indian man—was flown from London to Paris yesterday morning.

The Eritrean, who appeared to be in his 20s, was sitting in the last row of the aircraft, dressed in a white hooded top and black Adidas tracksuit trousers.

 

Flight AF1381 was full apart from the seat next to him, with three Home Office staff, including two security guards, sitting further along. 

As the plane took off, the migrant, with short hair and a short beard, gazed out the window at the vivid orange sunrise.

While a Home Office officer was observed completing a complex form, he took a packet of Breton cookies and a cup of tea with sugar from the cabin crew.

At the High Court yesterday, Mr Justice Sheldon heard claims the man had been ‘forced to flee Eritrea in 2019 because of forced conscription’ and spent time in Ethiopia, South Sudan and Libya.

He travelled to France, where he remained in Paris for about a week, where he was ‘homeless and destitute and constantly fearing for his life’.

The man then went to Dunkirk, where he remained in the encampment known as ‘The Jungle’ for about three weeks, without declaring asylum in France.

He arrived in the UK via a small boat and was detained by the UK Border Force on August 6, before being told his asylum claim in the UK was inadmissible on August 9.

Barristers for the man, who cannot be named, had argued that the decision was ‘procedurally unfair’ as he had not been given sufficient opportunity to put forward evidence supporting his claim that he was an ‘alleged trafficking victim’.

In a ruling, Mr Justice Sheldon said, ‘There is no serious issue to be tried in this case,’ and that the man gave differing accounts of his allegations of trafficking.

‘It was open to (the Home Office) to conclude that his credibility was severely damaged and his account of trafficking could not reasonably be believed,’ the judge added.

He also said there was ‘significant public interest in favour of the claimant’s removal’.

Hundreds of migrants attempted to cross the Channel this morning as the deportation took place.

At least one inflatable dinghy full of young men made its way out to sea from Gravelines beach, northeast Calais, at daybreak this morning.

As the boat came close to shore, people waded through waist-high water towards it and a child was handed aboard before it went out to sea.

In the town itself at 5.30 am, a group of 40 young men emerged from a tranquil side street carrying an inflatable boat over their heads before casting it into a canal.

From the bank, police officers observed the boat’s driver struggling to maintain a straight path.

Earlier in the night, a group of men formed a human chain to help drag people out of the mud after a failed endeavour to launch a boat in the canal.

Another Eritrean man successfully asked the judges on Tuesday to temporarily stop his removal after the same judge found there was a ‘serious issue to be tried’ over whether his expulsion was lawful amid claims he had been trafficked.

In that case, the court heard that the national referral mechanism (NRM) – which recognises and evaluates victims of slavery and human trafficking – found that the man had probably not been trafficked but offered him time to make additional representations.

Mr Justice Sheldon said there was ‘still room for further investigation into the trafficking claim’.

The Home Office changed its policy on re-examining rulings on modern slavery after Tuesday’s hearing. This means that anyone who wishes to challenge an NRM decision after being sent to a safe country would not be able to do so.

Alternatively, they may file a lawsuit from another nation, like France.

The latest deportation will come as a relief to the Home Office amid pressure to tackle the small boats crisis, with Donald Trump suggesting Sir Keir Starmer should use the military.

The US President said during his state visit to the UK that the Prime Minister ‘should take a very strong stand’ on immigration, which is ‘really hurting him badly’.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the first return showed people crossing the Channel that ‘if you enter the UK illegally, we will seek to remove you’.

She said she would ‘continue to challenge any last-minute, vexatious attempts to frustrate a removal in the courts’.

The returns agreement had encountered increasing scrutiny after reports of flights for removals being withdrawn earlier this week.

Ministers agreed on the pilot scheme with the French government in July as part of efforts to deter the record number of small boat arrivals.

Mr Trump pressed Sir Keir to include the military only hours after the first removal under the deal.

During a joint news conference with the prime minister at Chequers, the president emphasised his own track record of safeguarding the US borders and implied that the UK faced a comparable challenge.

He said, ‘You have people coming in and I told the Prime Minister I would stop it, and it doesn’t matter if you call out the military; it doesn’t matter what means you use.’

‘It destroys countries from within, and we’re actually now removing a lot of the people that came into our country.’

The American leader later said of Sir Keir in a Fox News interview, ‘I think he should take a very strong stand on immigration. It’s really hurting him badly.’

As Trump has stated, our government needs to halt all assistance for illegal migrants and use our military to expel them. Perhaps even send in the SAS to take out these people smugglers because we are effectively being overrun, and if Starmer doesn’t like it, he can always look the other way.

Although this sector is now valued at hundreds of millions of pounds, the truth is that it costs taxpayers billions of pounds, costing us our lives, and causes suffering for millions of people, forcing us to make sacrifices so that our government can allow migrants to enter the UK safely.

The lives, safety, and welfare of our own citizens should be our government’s top priority, but under Labour, these needs have been neglected. This must end.

Regardless of the repercussions for them, we must physically halt these unlawful crossings; otherwise, we will be left to suffer in order for Labour to create space for others.

Pushbacks have been utilised by other nations; they were successful, and the world did not condemn them.

We should quit calling them ‘asylum seekers’; they are ‘freebie seekers’. It’s as simple as that, and other countries they cross have more sense than to give them lots of rewards to entice them in.

The government could prevent this. It is utterly repulsive and wicked that they appear determined to destroy the nation and demoralise its population, even though they could defend our borders and its citizens.

‘Burned Alive’ In Tesla After Car Crash

A 43-year-old man and two nine-year-old children have died after being ‘burned alive’ when they became trapped inside a Tesla.

The car went up in flames on September 7 after it came off the road and crashed into a tree in western Germany, police said.

The man and the children died at the scene, but there are no further details.

A local resident tried to rescue the others but was unable to open the door with the Tesla’s retractable handles, German media outlets report.

Roman Jedrzejewski, who runs a paint shop opposite the crash site in Schwerte, North Rhine-Westphalia, said he sprinted over to the vehicle with a fire extinguisher after hearing a loud bang.

He told local Ruhr News: ‘I wanted to rescue some people.

‘I tried to open the car, but that didn’t work either. It was already so hot from the fire, but the right side of the car was still relatively undamaged.

‘Damn it, I didn’t help. It didn’t work.’

The fire continued to burn, with local firefighters also struggling to put it out due to repeated flare-ups.

The crash, which police said took place when the Tesla tried to overtake another car, is still being investigated by North Rhine-Westphalia’s police department.

The district police department stated: ‘Our goal is to fully reconstruct the course of events and clearly determine the cause.’

The country’s automobile association (ADAC) cautioned in April 2024 that retractable door handles could be a safety risk.

They explained that the door handles could remain retracted after the electrical supply is interrupted after an accident.

The fatal crash came a few days before Bloomberg discovered several accidents where passengers became trapped inside a Tesla after an accident.

Max Walsh, an off-duty firefighter from Virginia, was unable to use his bare hands to bust in a window and open the Model Y car’s doors to save the driver.

On Tuesday, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported an investigation into as many as 174,000 Model Y Tesla cars after reports of electric door handles that could not be opened.

These reports included instances where parents were attempting to pull a child from the car.

Children may not be able to use or access the manual door releases found within Tesla vehicles, even if the driver is aware.

Tesla’s design chief, Franz von Holzhausen, also told Bloomberg on Wednesday that the company is working on a redesign of the door handles following the reports of incidents.

Tesla was contacted for comment by Metro.

There have been numerous deaths caused by this design flaw, which has been reported. There needs to be a class-action suit.

They are poorly made and full of faults, and why they are so popular is beyond me.

I Got The Golden Buzzer On BGT

When I first heard Sarah Ikumu sing ‘I’m Telling You’ on Britain’s Got Talent, I was blown away.

In 1982, Jennifer Holliday, the actress who portrayed Effie in the original Broadway show, released the song as a single. It was her first single release, and it met with tremendous success, topping the Billboard R&B charts and reaching top forty positions on both the Billboard Hot 100 and the UK Singles Chart.

But when Sarah Ikumu sang it on BGT at the gentle age of 15 years old, she put an entirely distinct brilliance on it – she was spectacular. However, she never obtained the acclaim that she deserved.

Sarah belted that song out with unlimited conviction, and how she didn’t win BGT is beyond me. The judges evidently didn’t see the talent when it was right in front of their eyes.

Simon Cowell should be ashamed of himself. He’s been in the music industry long enough to know talent when he sees it.

There is no public record of Sarah Ikumu having a formal record deal, although she continues to release music independently and has collaborated with other artists and labels, such as the dance track ‘Spotlight’ on Defected Records in 2022.

However, she is a promising newcomer in the R&B genre and has performed for high-end brands.

She is seen as a promising new artist with a profound voice in the R&B and contemporary R&B scene, and she actively shares her work and updates with fans through her Instagram account, but she deserves more acclaim.

When Sarah came out onto the stage at BGT, and she sang, after Simon said it was the best audition he had ever heard, and she was given the Golden Buzzer, but it wasn’t enough for her to win BGT, although she said that she has so much to be grateful to Simon Cowell and she said that meeting him was scarier than meeting the King. She also said that his reputation is terrifying, but she also thought he was a sweetheart – others might disagree!

Patient Left On The Table By A 44-Year-Old Surgeon

A senior surgeon has been allowed to return to practice medicine after abandoning a patient on an operating table during surgery to engage in sexual relations with a nurse in a nearby operating room.

Consultant anaesthetist Suhail Anjum, 44, was discovered ‘in a compromising position’ with another nurse at Tameside General Hospital in 2023.

The father-of-three was caught tying up the cord of his trousers, while his colleague had her undergarments on display, when the pair were surprised by another nurse.

A disciplinary panel has now found that Dr Anjum’s ‘deplorable’ actions amounted to serious misconduct, but concluded that as there was a ‘very low risk’ of them being repeated.

It ruled that a written warning should remain on the doctor’s registration for two years, saying his fitness to practise medicine was not impaired.

Married Dr Anjum – who said he felt ‘shame and guilt at this horribly embarrassing incident’ – is now back working in his native Pakistan.

However, he has expressed hopes of returning to the UK to work in the NHS again.

The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service hearing in Manchester was told that Dr Anjum left the patient, who was having keyhole surgery to remove a gall bladder, because he knew that his colleague – referred to as Nurse C – was likely to be nearby’.

He told colleagues he needed a ‘comfort break’, the panel was told.

But a second nurse who went to prepare medical equipment in a different operating theatre was ‘shocked’ to come across the pair engaging in ‘sexual activity’.

Dr Anjum admitted all the allegations, saying the incident occurred during a period when he and his wife ‘were not connecting as a couple’.

‘I have let down everybody,’ he said.

‘It was the lowest point of my career.

‘I am genuinely sorry and shamed and fully recognise the seriousness of my behaviour.

‘It was a one-off error and I will never repeat this behaviour.

‘I would like to ensure the panel that it will not happen again, but that does not take away the guilt and embarrassment.

‘I have only myself to blame.’

Panel chair Rebecca Miller said Dr Anjum had ‘engaged in sexual activity within a public workplace setting, whilst on duty, in the middle of an operation’, thereby breaching good medical practice.

He had ‘left a vulnerable patient unattended in the middle of an operation and placed his own interests before those of his patient and colleagues’, as well as harming the reputation of the medical profession.

But the panel accepted it had been ‘a momentary lapse of judgement rather than a sustained pattern of behaviour’.

The patient was unharmed, while Dr Anjum had been ‘honest’ and ‘shown genuine remorse’.

Mrs Miller said a public warning was necessary ‘to ensure that public confidence is maintained in the profession and the regulatory system’, as well as acting ‘as a deterrent’.

Dr Anjum qualified in Lahore in 2004 and began working in the UK in 2011, holding positions in Bristol, Milton Keynes, and Dartford before moving to the Tameside and Glossop Integrated Trust in 2015.

He left the Trust in 2024 and worked in Liverpool before returning to Pakistan.

So, this man commits grave wrongdoing but maintains his job – what a farce, but then doctors look after their own, and he would have had to kill someone in a way that couldn’t be construed as a mistake before they took away his licence.

And what about the nurse? What it boils down to is that they both wanted a quickie without being found out. Hopefully, she will now be advised to keep her knickers on at work at all times.

More suction, please, nurse!

Charlie Kirk Suspect Tyler Robinson Will Face A Capital Murder Charge

Prosecutors are getting ready to charge Tyler Robinson, the alleged Charlie Kirk assassin, with capital murder, which could result in his execution by firing squad.

Charges against Robinson, 22, are expected to come ahead of the first court hearing since he was accused last week of shooting Kirk, sources close to prosecutors told the Associated Press.

Kirk, 31, was a conservative activist credited with energising the Republican youth movement and helping President Donald Trump win back the White House in 2024.

Authorities say Robinson held a ‘leftist ideology’ and may have been ‘radicalised’ online before he was arrested for killing the MAGA influencer.

The most serious allegation that Utah County prosecutors are pursuing against Robinson is aggravated murder, which carries the possibility of the death penalty in the event of a conviction.

Utah is one of five states that still allow the firing squad as a form of death punishment, even though lethal injection is the most common method of execution in the United States.

Robinson is expected to appear on video for a virtual court session following the filing of charges. Since his arrest, he has been detained without being granted bail, and it is unknown if he has legal representation.

Investigators have been piecing together evidence, including a rifle and ammunition branded with anti-fascist and meme culture messaging, discovered after the shooting on Wednesday at Utah Valley University in Orem.

Kirk was speaking there on one of his numerous campus visits, where he enjoyed debating just about everyone.

While authorities say Robinson hasn’t been cooperating with investigators, they do say his family and friends have been talking.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said over the weekend that those who know Robinson say his politics shifted left in recent years and that he spent a lot of time in the ‘dark corners of the internet’.

FBI Director Kash Patel said Monday that DNA evidence has linked Robinson to a towel wrapped around a rifle found near the Utah Valley campus and a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop where the fatal shot was fired.

Before the shooting, Robinson wrote in a note that he had an opportunity to take out Kirk and was going to do it, according to Patel.

Investigators are working on finding a motive for the attack, Utah’s governor said Sunday, adding that more information may come out once Robinson appears for his initial court hearing.

Cox said Robinson’s romantic partner was transgender, which some politicians have pointed to as a sign the suspect was targeting Kirk for his anti-transgender views. But authorities have not yet said whether that played a role. 

Kirk was shot while taking a question that touched on mass shootings, gun violence and transgender people.

Utah Department of Public Safety Commissioner Beau Mason said Monday that Robinson’s partner has been cooperative. 

He said investigators believe Robinson acted alone during the shooting, but they also are looking at whether anyone knew of his plans beforehand.

Robinson justified his actions by saying, ‘Some hatred cannot be negotiated with,’ Patel added.

The embattled head of the bureau, who faces a Senate grilling over his handling of the investigation, revealed the shocking motive of Tyler Robinson.

Patel added that when Robinson was questioned why he would kill the conservative influencer, he responded: ‘Some hatred cannot be negotiated with.’

The investigation, according to Patel, has featured witness interviews between both the FBI and local and regional law enforcement, where they found Robinson ‘essentially admitted’ to killing Kirk.

The director also tempered concerns about how long details pertaining to the investigation were taking, saying that he ‘won’t stylise the evidence’ but that ‘information will come out’. 

Robinson was taken into custody after a high-profile manhunt following the fatal shooting of the 31-year-old conservative influencer at a demonstration last week.

When the perpetrator of the deadly shooting was eventually caught by police, Cox had earlier promised to execute them.

Among the few states that still use firing squad executions are Utah, along with Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and South Carolina.

Historically, the use of the firing squad was mostly restricted to the state of Utah, when legislators in 1851 established three likely punishments for murder: shooting, hanging or beheading. 

Since 1608, at least 144 civilian prisoners have been executed by shooting in the US, nearly all in Utah.

Since the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, only four executions of this kind have happened, with the most recent being Brad Sigmon in March. 

He was convicted of bludgeoning his ex-girlfriend’s parents to death and was executed at South Carolina’s Broad River Correctional Institution, making him the first person to die by the firing squad in the state for 15 years.

I don’t agree with the death penalty. Never have and never will. A life sentence with no parole, but to take a life for a life is not a deterrent, and makes the person conducting the execution no better than the person they are killing. As they say, ‘An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind.’

If it were a deterrent, why is there so much knife and gun crime in the US?

Robinson is a 22-year-old man who chose to kill another human being. He knew that he would be executed. Perhaps he didn’t value his life that much, or perhaps he was brainwashed by somebody else – it happens all the time, but ultimately it was a violent crime that will end his life – his family must be devastated.

This is a pointless waste of two lives, and for what exactly? This is such a sad example of the madness in today’s world, but let’s not fall into the trap that life is cheap; it’s not. Our lives are valuable, and we must all strive to live our best lives, not just for ourselves but for others as well.

Sumo: Florida Mum Delivers Record-Breaking Baby

A Florida mum stunned the maternity ward after delivering a record-breaking baby boy weighing twice the average newborn’s size.

Daniella Hines, 40, welcomed her son Annan on September 3 at St. Joseph’s Hospital-South in Riverview.

Nurses on the ward were left stunned after weighing him at a whopping 13 pounds, 15 ounces, which broke a hospital record.

‘He was the talk of the maternity ward,’ Hines told TODAY. 

At just eight days old, Annan was already wearing clothes designed for a nine-month-old baby and had earned the nickname ‘Sumo’.

 

Annan is Hines and her husband Andre Sr.’s second child, with their first, Andre Jr., born weighing 12 pounds, 11 ounces.

But Hines was still shocked when her baby was handed to her, as she recalled how different the birth of her second felt.

 

‘I remember thinking, “What are they pulling out of me? What is going on here?” I felt so much pressure,’ she told the outlet.

Her confusion subsided when she saw Annan for the first time, and she added, ‘He was so big. I was like, “Whose baby is this? He came out of me?”

Hines stands at six feet, while her husband is six feet two inches tall. She believes their height played an enormous part in determining their children’s size.

Because hospital personnel thought Annan was the largest baby ever delivered to their ward, the not-so-little baby became the talk of the ward.

‘Everybody starts coming in because it’s not every day you see an almost 14-pound baby pop out,’ Hines continued. ‘He was like a little celebrity.’

St. Joseph’s Hospital-South called Annan a ‘big miracle.’

‘Annan is believed to be among the biggest babies, if not the biggest baby, ever born at St. Joseph’s Hospital-South,’ staff wrote on Facebook.

Hines responded on the post with great thanks for ‘such great hospitality,’ and added that Annan’s ‘weight came as a surprise to us as well.’

‘He is such a big, beautiful blessing,’ she wrote, adding with laughter to the comment section, ‘yes, I had a C-Section.’ 

Hines’ husband, Andre Sr., shared on social media that their baby boy had already donned the nickname ‘Sumo.’

On Monday, Hines wrote: ‘It’s been almost a week since our little, or should I say BIG bundle of joy made his debut into this world.’

‘Who knew he would be a baby celebrity,’ she continued. 

Annan was doing ‘fine’ after his first week at home, and Hines was continuing her recovery from her second C-Section birth ‘due to high risk and weight’.

‘I’m still in awe, he was estimated to weigh around 11lbs (which is still big) and here we are,’ she wrote.

‘Now the focus is on making sure he stays healthy and taking back all these small clothes and size newborn/number 1 diapers that won’t fit.’

On Thursday, Hines shared more images of baby Annan, who was sleeping peacefully with a little smile on his face.

‘We are so in love with the newest addition to the family,’ she wrote. 

‘Annan is eight days old and wearing 6-9 months in clothes and size 2 diapers! Look at those squishy cheeks and juicy rolls!’

Annan’s mother told TODAY that her newborn has been ‘really chill,’ except for when it’s time to eat. 

‘We didn’t expect such a big blessing, but it’s just more to love!’ Hines said. ‘I can’t wait to show him when he gets older: “Look, you were in the news!”

In March, a mother in Alabama gave birth to a baby girl who was the size of a three-month-old, weighing 13 pounds, 4 ounces.

In 2019, a New York woman named Joy Buckley gave birth to a baby girl who weighed 15 pounds, 5 ounces.

‘I felt like I had been hit by two tractor-trailers simultaneously,’ she told the Washington Post the day after the birth.

A baby boy born in September 1955 in Aversa, Italy, now holds the Guinness World record for the heaviest baby born to a healthy mother.

The boy weighed in at a whopping 22 pounds, eight ounces.

It’s good to see some happiness in the world because this is a very positive story for once.

The parents are so happy, and the baby is doing well. This is what we need to see more of.

For whatever reason, some mums simply give birth to large infants, and this one is gorgeous.

Protesters Clash With Police In London, Tommy Robinson Takes To The Stage

The Met Police were on high alert with more than a thousand officers drafted in as two large-scale demonstrations were underway in London. An estimated 110,000 people were taking part in the right-wing ‘Unite the Kingdom’ protest, police say.

Footage showed Robinson supporters draped in flags fighting with the police, with some ‘Unite the Kingdom’ protesters climbing on the fence outside Portcullis House, where MPs have their offices.

Witnesses informed Metro that during the Stand Up To Racism march, there were also some altercations between demonstrators and police.

Met Police said: ‘A crowd of ‘Unite the Kingdom’ protesters attempted to enter the sterile area on Whitehall, that is a place to keep the two protests apart. Officers were attacked with projectiles and had to use force to avoid their cordon being breached.’

Tommy Robinson supporters and Stand Up to Racism protesters have stared each other down at different protests in Whitehall.

The two groups were separated by a line of police officers on Whitehall Place, one side waving placards that said ‘refugees welcome. Stop the far right’ and the other flying Union and St George’s flags.

Anti-fascist protesters yelled ‘Tommy Robinson’s a wanker’ and ‘whose streets, our streets’.

A speaker said the Tommy Robinson demonstration was ‘so boring, they’ve come round to listen to us’.

Stand Up to Racism protesters were yelling ‘fascist scum’, metres from a group of Tommy Robinson protesters who were behind police holding riot protection gear.

The Robinson protesters were at the edge of Horse Guards Avenue, while the anti-fascist protesters were assembled on Whitehall. The two streets are perpendicular.

The Robinson protesters waved Union flags and a metre-wide St George’s flag that said ‘stop the boats’.

They could be seen screaming at the line of officers and towards the anti-fascist gathering.

In the heart of London, Tommy Robinson took the stage.

Addressing the cheering masses, he said: ‘Look around you. Feel your strength. You are part of a tidal wave of patriotism that is sweeping across this country.

‘This is the biggest demonstration in British history.

‘Turn to the person next to you. Shake their hand, greet them, give them a hug – this is your community.

‘These are your brothers and sisters.

‘We today are united.

‘Today is the spark of a cultural revolution in Great Britain.

‘This is our moment.

‘The traitors in Westminster are watching right now.

‘They are cowering, they are trembling. Keir Starmer, the Labour Party – the revolution has started.’

The Metropolitan Police estimated that the number of people at the ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally was about 110,000.

It put the number at the counter ‘Stand Up To Racism’ rally at around 5,000.

A force spokesman said estimates were difficult but that it used CCTV and police helicopter footage to calculate the figures, and they conceded that there would be differences between their estimates and that of the organisers.

From Russell Square, hundreds of Stand Up to Racism demonstrators began their march towards Whitehall, and the gathering chanted ‘stand up, fight back’ and ‘we are the women, we won’t be silenced, stop the fascists now, now, now, now.’

On their way to Whitehall, thousands of demonstrators crossed Westminster Bridge after leaving Waterloo.

Robinson said, ‘patriotism is the future, borders are the future’ as he reiterated his claim that it was the ‘biggest demonstration in British history’.

In a video from the rally, the activist added that ‘Britain has finally awoken’ and that ‘this is never going away’.

All of the flags were great to see, but we are all so easily divided now.

As usual, Tommy Robinson’s supporters had different intentions despite his request for a nonviolent demonstration.

However, stand tall and proud. We are not fascists, we are true Britons standing up for our country. The real fascists are screaming for violence, dancing over the graves of the honourable dead men who battled for our country.

Simply said, we don’t want to finance illegal migrants and make our nation a haven for terrorists.

These people are just regular citizens fed up with this migrant madness wreaking havoc on our country. It’s got nothing to do with racism. We just want to end this migrant madness, and what benefit do they actually bring to this country?

POLL OF THE DAY: Should Keir Starmer Be Ousted As Prime Minister?

Following the humiliating dismissal of Lord Mandelson, Keir Starmer is dealing with growing discontent from both political rivals and members of the Labour Party.

New Labour architect Mandelson was dramatically sacked from his position as US ambassador on Thursday after the emergence of emails to notorious paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, describing him as his ‘best pal’.

Many Members of Parliament are incensed about the incident and the fact that Sir Keir chose Lord Mandelson for the position in the first place.

Left-wing MP Clive Lewis became the first to call for the PM to go, telling the BBC’s The Week in Westminster that the atmosphere in the Parliamentary Labour Party had become ‘very, very dangerous’.

And it has since emerged that Manchester mayor Andy Burnham could be planning to oust Sir Keir, with a sitting MP allegedly prepared to stand down to let Mr Burnham back into the House of Commons.

You can now cast your vote in the Daily Mail poll on whether Sir Keir should be removed from Downing Street as the Labour Party’s terrible week comes to a close and more rage is on the horizon.

Not only should Keir Starmer be ousted, but an election should be called – Labour are not fit for purpose.

Both Labour and Conservatives need to be closed to all elections. They’ve had their time in office, and they were equally ineffective, and mark my words, Reform will not be any more useful – we need totally fresh blood, not something that has sat in a test tube for over 50 years.

The Tories are finished, Labour are hopeless, and even Reform have admitted they are not electable, so who do we vote for?

At the moment, there is not one politician in the UK who has what is needed to run the country!

Thankfully, I’m not one of the number one idiots who voted for this shambles of a government – I wouldn’t vote for the Conservatives either, and before you criticise, I did vote, just not for them.

We need a fixed term for a Prime Minister to be in office, and once they are in office, there needs to be a 14-month cooling-off period, not for the Prime Minister who has been elected, but for the people, especially if that PM pledged something they did not deliver, and then there needs to be another General Election.

If you pledge or promise something, that is deemed a verbal contract and is essentially a legally binding contract in the UK, especially if it’s an intent to do something, but that can be difficult to argue if it is not in writing, so from now on any Prime Minister who says that he will do something for the British people needs to put it writing, otherwise people are not going to believe what they say, not after Starmer anyway.

They should therefore be removed from office right away if they fail to fulfil the aforementioned vow or promise, because they all promise us the earth before they get in, but once they’re in, it’s a different story.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started