THE MONTHLY MOSQUITO

Sorry, Ed Miliband

It doesn’t matter how much Ed Miliband’s lips tremble, his dad was; as indicated, a far wing highbrow, whose gratefulness to a nation that took him in, extended merely to hoping it might be pulled apart, root by root.

The fact that Ralph Miliband was a suburban North London émigré, does not change the reality that he was, like so many scholars, allured by the political and economic theories of Karl Marx.

Our universities are effectively the only locations in the educated society where this preposterous and discredited belief goes on to flourish; much of it today being utter attitudinising rubbish.

We shouldn’t hold Ralph Miliband responsible for groaning about how nationalistic the British were when he initially arrived, they in all likelihood were and, it’s true that while he was a Marxist, he withstood the warning call of the repulsive Commie Party of Great Britain, which was to his credence and, I’m sure he was as well a delightful father and, held dinner parties every bit as pleasant as those now presented by his son.

Ralph Miliband was born in Belgium and, made his home in England to get away from the Nazi Holocaust. He has been best recognised as one of the intellectual Marxists of his time.

He learnt to speak English and, enrolled at the London School of Economics, where he became absorbed in the left wing political views and, became dedicated to the belief of social democracy.

By the 1960s, he was a well-known constituent of the New Left political organisation in Britain, which was condemning of the well-known Stalinist governments in the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc.

Growing up in Brussels, he became a member of the Hashomer Hatzair (Young Guard) at the age of 15, a left-wing Zionist youth organisation.

Following the eruption of WWII, the Miliband family, being Jewish, decided to escape the country from the anti Semitic Nazi power.

To Ralph Miliband’s shock, he came across prejudice in London and, he established that the Englishman was a fanatical nationalist.

He promised to be loyal to the Workers’ cause, while benefiting from living in England, which offered him a home and security. Ralph Miliband despised the Royal Family, the Church of England and, the Army and, wanted a workers’ rebellion.

He in all probability disliked the Royal Family for the faux doctoral establishment it has always been and, the Church, as he was a doubting Thomas.

And, not the Army workforce, but more precisely the military armament network that sucks the prosperity out of all but a few.

For those of a particular age, Ed Miliband’s talk last week was exhilaratingly wistful. His promise to freeze energy costs made people think of happier times when Labour strategies were patently and, shamelessly ridiculous.

Following a generation of loss, we start to hope to discover reds under the bed once again. In its comprehensible delight, a daily paper made the error of pinpointing only a dead red, Mr Miliband’s late father, Ralph Miliband.

It in addition magnified its mistake by saying that the older Miliband hated Britain, on the foundation of some irate comments he uttered when he was 17.

The tabloid newspaper managed to offend against taste and propriety on numerous matters and, criticised a man for his dead father’s opinions, giving false accounts of those points of view and, as well condemned a Jew.

The daily newspaper debased the constitutional process with its criticism on Ralph Miliband. There was no rationale for the headline on the Miliband article which said he hated Britain.

This is carrying political science to an area that is plainly degrading and, it’s not warranted and, totally out of reference. The man fought for his country and, we now live in a completely changed life to the mismatch connecting communism and fascism.

It’s brutal and ridiculous to blame a man for his viewpoint that was shaped in his youth, where he was misled, but not unpatriotic and, if that’s the situation, does that convey that all people in this day and age, if they seem as if they’re being unpatriotic that they should all be chastised as being Marxist?

Ed Miliband’s decision to protect his father is what any child would do and, it’s predictable that a child in any path of life, not just one that’s engaged in politics would come to the defence of their parent.

It’s what you’d expect a child to do and, that’s plainly what’s taking place here and, we should grasp and respect that. No one is in a position to form an opinion and, Ed Miliband will have been familiar with his father far better than any of us could have conceivably have done.

When you have ancestors that don’t come from this country, people do feel extremely fragile, especially if the patriotism of those relations is called into question.

It can be an extremely upsetting thing and, I would certainly want to launch an attack back if it was me.

I can’t see why Ed Miliband should be harassed for preserving his fathers name, after all Ralph Miliband is no longer alive and, can’t defend his good name, so why shouldn’t his son do it for him?

If someone was finding fault with my father’s name, someone that I embraced in high admiration, I would hold that human being contemptible and, reject their allegations because no one should discredit another person, particularly one that is no longer alive and can’t defend themselves and, those that do disparage a dead person is a coward.

But what do I know, I’m merely a Jew!

Iain Duncan Smith claimed a £39 breakfast as expenses (He must have been hungry!)

The Work and Pensions Secretary was condemned of living in a different world after a newspaper exposed his flavour for the morning banquet.

Iain Duncan Smith lay claim that he could survive on just £53 a week, fell apart last night after evidence surfaced of a £39 breakfast he attempted to put on as expenses.

The Work and Pensions Secretary was criticised of living in a different world; after a newspaper unveiled his taste for the morning blow out which would leave him exactly £14 for the rest of the week.

The Cabinet minister claims he is aware of what it’s like to live on a humble income and, has dismissed a challenge from a 370,000 strong appeal for him to demonstrate it, which places his character as being a bit of a shit and, a bit of a namby-pamby university oddity, if you were to ask me; still your not asking me, I’m merely a figment of your imagination!

But Mr Duncan Smith, made a claim on his Commons expenses for a £193 hotel stay, comprising a breakfast for £39.

Who in this world squanders that much on a breakfast and, was he having a feast for his morning blowout, including Caviar? Or, does he like to be that ostentatious and, if that’s the case, maybe the public should shackle his mouth so that he can save the taxpayer some money.

The proof of purchase submitted to the Parliamentary authorities when he was an opposition MP, manifests that he as well claimed for a mini bar bill and, in one instance, a £9 cocktail.

If he wants to drink alcohol on his own time and, out of his personal funds that would be justifiable, but to blatantly do it out of the taxpayers money is absolutely appalling and, taking advantage and, in that case, he must think extremely little of his own constituents.

A newspaper also disclosed that Mr Duncan Smith has yet to pay a visit a food bank since becoming Work and Pensions Secretary in May 2010, in spite of his claim to having been aware of what it’s like to be on the breadline.

Unison General Secretary Dave Prentis said: “Everyone, including a man who spends £39 on one breakfast, would struggle to survive on £53 a week.

“Iain Duncan Smith can bluster all he likes, but he is living in a different world to millions who have to live on pittance thanks to his policies.”

Mr Duncan Smith sparked fury by telling a County Durham market trader he could live on £53 “if I had to.”

But of course, Iain Duncan Smith will never have to survive off £53, his life will always be electrifying because he has this talent of misleading the public wherever he goes.

So, he can say things like being able to sustain himself on £53 a week because he knows he will never have to do it and, all that he’s doing is delivering a red herring to the public.

Back to the workhouse

The most recent squeeze is the governments aim at dealing with a deficit sourced by the wealthy and, is to carry on penalising the poor for being poor. Presently they’re forming a plan to make the jobless carry out four week periods of mandatory unpaid work, or have their benefits stopped for up to three months.

Who would have believed that the workhouse, that notorious establishment affiliated with Victorian times and, which lives on in the composition of Charles Dickens, would inch its way closer to becoming reality once again in the 21st century?

At the present time, Jobseekers Allowance for adults over the age of 25 stands at £71.70 per week. For those under 25, it’s £56.80. Neither amount can by any stretch of the imagination be described as excessively high.

It’s the opposite, the current level of Jobseekers Allowance is not sufficient to pay for anything approaching what nearly all people in work would deem a proper standard of life and, nevertheless, since the general election, the ConDem alliance has centred an excessive quantity of awareness on criticising those receiving of Jobseekers Allowance, as well as those in receit of additional benefits, such as Incapacity and Housing Benefit.

This is done under the rubric of an extremely flexible explanation of the term progressive, one largely advertised by the Lib Dem, half of the union to fit in with how they like to look at themselves, even if according to current opinion polls barely anyone else does any longer.

As for the warped prism through which Tories consider society, this can merely be comprehended in terms of social division, in spite of objections to the contrary by Mr Cameron et al., this is a political party who’s enduring aim is the promotion in the interest of the wealthy and, big business at the expense of the poor and, the working class.

Unemployment is a traumatic experience and, the shame, social abuse, humiliation and monetary deprivation associated it, which flies in the face of the right wing ideas of people lazing about luxurious accommodation and, living it up.

The feeling of isolation can cause them to commit crimes, have stress related illnesses and, various other social and human illnesses and, yet in spite of this, the alliance plans on aggravating the situation, rather than alleviating it with attack after attack.

Cancer Drugs Funded Until 2016

A £200 million a year reserve, for life boosting cancer medicine is to carry on up until 2016; the Prime Minister has announced.

This must be a sign of things to come and, it’s all extremely magnificent, but what happens to those sick people that are being given medical care, following 2016?

Well, after 2016, if the nest egg isn’t prolonged, in that case, all those patients that are being given medical care and, medicated to preserve their lives will be informed that they’re not eligible any longer and, some will eventually lose their lives.

The project was expected to end next year, but David Cameron has promised £400 million to keep it ticking over and, it’s beneficial to keep it ticking over, as this move means for Mr Cameron, that logistically, he anticipates putting himself as a front runner, so that he can be the winner of the next election, since people will then believe that if he doesn’t get in, the project will merely continue up until the next election takes place.

From now up until the next election all people will see is the here and now, what the government are doing and, they will try to convince you that it’s to try and make the United Kingdom a better place.

And, that’s all people will see, as the government surges a cargo of cash into many enterprises that they think people will want to see and, they won’t worry on how much cash they pump into these different schemes because deep down they know they’re not going to be the winners of the next election.

Cancer organisations have greeted the move positively, yet Labour have blamed the Prime Minister of letting patients down. Well, there will be a large amount of sick people who will be let down after the next election, unless the next faction go about doing things more wisely than the last did, which we all have aspirations for, but will that be the case; yet I for one, am not holding my breath, since they all give one’s word that they will give you the Garden of Eden and, then they give you Hell on Earth.

I congratulate those people that will be getting medical care and, the role that the fund will perform in fighting the disease and, tens of thousands of people who will be given medical care because of it, but what will become of those people that won’t be eligible for treatment because they didn’t live in the right postal address?

There are around 30 medications that are obtainable on the Cancer Drugs Fund and, over the last three years around 34,000 sick people have had medical care that they wouldn’t have had otherwise, had the money not existed.

Admittedly some of these patients wouldn’t have survived, had this cash not been accessible and, what has been achieved is brilliant, but who is going to deal with the sick people that will be refused medical care after 2016?

The intention of the CDF was to make it easier for medics to prescribe treatments even if they’ve not so far been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice).

The project was set to run up until 2014 and, campaigners raised worries about where patients would turn for help when the resources came to an end.

So, following 2016, where will sick people turn for help when the money has ceased and, will activists have to raise their concerns once more?

David Cameron appears to be hanging out that carrot once more, because he said that the CDF had been a huge triumph and, added that should he be voted in once more, he would propose that it be continued beyond 2016.

He said it would be proposed, not that it would without question be maintained… Oh, that dangling carrot again.

This declaration, which will be warmly greeted by a great deal of sick people across the country and, will influence others into thinking that David Cameron is doing this for the good of the people.

A good number of you need to peruse all through the fine print since Mr Cameron will never do anything other than getting himself results from the general public and, those results are votes that they will give him, if he appears virtuous and, looking as if he’s doing the proper thing.

Another charity said that while the announcement was optimistic, it warned it was just a stop gap and, highlighted the instance of a lady who was unsuccessful and, did not fulfil CDF specifications to Avastin, a medication demonstrated to delay recurrence and, what is the criteria and, why do some people fulfil it and, a number of people don’t.

After all, Cancer is Cancer, it doesn’t prey on particular people, so why should certain people be selected to satisfy a particular specification and, that if they don’t meet that specification, they don’t get medical care.

It’s just about being fortunate, but that’s not fair and, it shouldn’t be a matter of good fortune and, some people get medical care because they’re charmed enough to live in the right postcode, but if they’re vulnerable and less assertive, or don’t have the help, they will in all likelihood die.

Schoolboy Who Raped Shows No Remorse

A schoolboy who sexually assaulted a six year old girl on two occasions has walked free from a court of law and, has been ordered to reward his victim just £300 recompense.

The 12 year old boy, who can’t be identified for legal reasons, confessed that he forced the girl to carry out a sex act on two occasions.

His parents took him to a police station when they heard about the sex attack accusations where he confessed to what he’d done straight away.

When the boy was asked what he felt about the effect that his wrongdoings had on the injured party, he said that he didn’t care how she felt.

The judge expressed that she was not sending him to a secure youth offending unit because she didn’t want him to be in the company of older and, more sophisticated criminals.

When thinking about how best to keep our children safe, particularly from sex offenders, we’re inclined to think about the endangers posed by grown-ups.

Seldom does the picture of a young person, maybe friend, or even a sibling come to our attention.

Although one third of sex offences are carried out by young people and sexual coercion; several incidents of which would be reported as an attack, or stalking if committed by an adult is a danger to a young persons well-being.

It’s roughly calculated that one in six children who have been sexually mistreated at some point in their lives, 80 percent of these will have been abused by an immediate family member or a trusted person, some of whom will be another child.

The number of recorded offences and, the number of children and young people found guilty in a court, or dealt with at a Children’s Hearing for offences against other children is a bad indicator of the measure of breaking the law.

A gauge of 60 percent of sex offending is overlooked and, UK research demonstrates that 75 percent of all accounted sexual offences against children remains undisclosed up until the child attains adulthood.

In Scotland, only 40 percent of sexual abuse and, as few as 25 percent of reported lecherous and lascivious offences against children result in sentencing.

Sex offenders frequently point out that, even though found guilty as an adult, their breaking the law started in their teens and, how sex offenders are comprehended has altered over time.

Previously sex offending by adults against children may have been ascribed to poor social functioning, immaturity and, even lack of sexual responsiveness of a partner.

Children or young people’s sexual violence was not considered to be a deliberate act of harm but as part of youthful experimentation, but when is a child’s sexual experimentation just not healthy?

Childhood sexual experimentation connecting two children of approximately comparable ages is typical and, almost all children have had sexual contact with other children at times throughout their childhood and; this is an expected part of child growth.

In keeping with the judgemental and predominately opposing comprehension of human desirability, religious fundamentalists, moralists, hypocrites and, other vendors of integrity who frequently attempt to portray any kind of sexuality other than straight intercourse between legally married partners.

These sex loathing, sex frightened persons regularly try to paint childhood sexuality as something evil, asserting that a child’s attraction in sex, or that a child’s experimenting sexually with others is by some means perverted or deviant, but this is plainly wrong.

A child’s attraction to sex is absolutely healthy and, in fact, is genetically programmed into the human brain.

There is no age boundary because interests about sex and sexual experimentation at any age are typical characteristics of human life.

This doesn’t signify that sexual acting out between children and, especially between siblings should be disregarded, permitted, or supported, but merely that almost all instances of it would be best seen and comprehended as a kind of developmental play, extremely different from adult sensuality.

Unquestionably projecting onto a child the adult phobias, adult myths, adult sadness and, adult religious prejudices with respect to behaviours which result innocently and, in response to strong, often angry processes of physical and mental maturation is unfair to a child and, a symbol of incompetent parenting.

The banning of incest is a legitimate topic and, as well a societal taboo, but clearly incest is both desired and experienced by a great deal of people, because if it were not, there would be no requirements for such powerful prohibitions opposing it.

Incest usually applies merely to actual sexual relations, additional kinds of sexual communication between close relatives is not technically incest and, in some cultures is completely run-of-the-mill.

A traditional Balinese family, the mother’s routinely stroke the penises of their young sons and, such behaviour is thought no more incestuous than breast feeding and, ordinary sexual experimentation between children inside the selfsame family is certainly not incest.

When incest, or any additional sexual connection takes place between an adult and a child, that adds up, by meaning to child abuse.

In fact, bodily contact is not even a specification for child abuse, because such activities as talking sexually to a child, presenting the child with pornographic material, revealing ones sex parts to a child and, other such sexualising of a relationship with a child may as well count as abuse, but sexual communication between two children of about the same ages and mental capacities does not, and cannot, by interpretation, amount to child abuse.

When one person enslaves a child to do things that she doesn’t want to, it means that that person has restrained that person like you would livestock.

It in addition, not only makes it abuse, but as well they have made that young person workable for their own endeavour and, not by free will.

The thoughts that cause adolescents to abuse makes it difficult for them to be a part of the community, they don’t look at human life as being extremely precious and, they see themselves as insignificant to the structure of society, consequently the system is inconsequential to them.

Twelve to thirteen year olds are inclined to go through an unsettled, difficult time as the child makes the change from prepubescence and, a swift alteration physically, socially and emotionally.

In all expanse of life it’s the dawn of a child’s passage from childhood to adulthood and, in all likelihood a bit of straying in nobody’s land on the way.

Mistreatment of young children at an early age is linked with considerable danger in future and more serious offending. The earlier and, the more severe the offending, the more difficult the behaviour is likely to be in adulthood.

Suppose somebody who detests being tickled is held down and mercilessly tickled over and over against their desire to be tickled. No matter how much they hated the unpleasant experience, they would involuntarily giggle.

It would be flagrant incomprehension about the average human response to tickling to assume that their unruly laughter was a sign that deep down they enjoyed it.

Similarly, when one’s body involuntarily sends signals to the brain in a response to sexual molestation, it says nothing about one’s morality or view with respect to the offence.

Everybody knows that a molester might be a brutal frightening monster of a man, or young person, but what is hard for one to understand, though, is that those who sexually impede on little children vary from this extreme through to responsible caregivers and, as we will find out, occasionally even loving mothers.

A molester might be such an insane fiend as to leave each victim extremely traumatised and, there are others, however, who are so tender, measured, consoling and relied upon that any normal child could not help but consider the sexual intervention as being as innate and, as enjoyable as breast feeding.

A child’s response is contingent on the molester’s technique, not the victim’s integrity and, pleasurable feelings are not restricted to children.

Abused survivors who, in response to their suffering, end up obsessed with stimulating their own sexual pleasures, or licentiousness, or loathing certain people, particularly their abuser. Their exploits are from time time less than praiseworthy and, they find themselves meshed in devastating behaviour that they detest.

Tragically, nonetheless, a further unpleasant response to sex abuse is for a number of former victims to end up sexually interfering with others and, they can end up as dependent on it as others become addicted to masturbation, or to despising their abuser, or to being in love with somebody who will end up harming them.

Victims of sexual immoral acts many times are afflicted with dreadful, but quite uncalled for twinges of self-reproach over being forced to feel enjoyment. Having a pleasant sensation in the middle of a sexual assault and, molestation is usually no more than a bodily response like losing blood.

If somebody buys someone else an ice cream and, whilst he’s consuming it the other person picks his pockets and thieves his credit card and, by the time he’s realised what has occurred he finds himself in a hopeless and difficult situation, with his bank account emptied out, yet that person would feel largely abused if asked if the ice cream tasted good, as if that had anything to do with the enormity of that persons deprivation.

When someone believes that they have possession of another person, in order to retain that right of possession they need something that gives them enjoyment and, that summons their arousal. Nonetheless, there is a particular inclination that makes them want to wallow in such fulfilment and, even though not always comprehensible, it is usually either that bond that someone has with a child, or the brutality that causes a relatively diligent caregiver to turn negligent in their responsibility with respect to that child.

So, when a young boy abuses that trust, one is hopeful that in such a predicament that a court of law will govern that the legal profession and, would work out that almost all young adults that abuse, will as they get older abuse once more and, it doesn’t matter how much therapy they’re given, the affliction that they have inside them will cause them to break the law again, even though some do not; it’s determining who will and who won’t and, do we in fact know that they won’t?

How Atos Are Taking Over

The NHS is not being privatised with a bang; but more with a cunning deceitful whine.

We only have to take a look at Holland, which privatised its health care system in 2006, to see how it’s feasible for the NHS to be privatised by secrecy.

Following the Dutch example, privatisation is occurring in three phases. First of all services of the health services is passed over to private firms.

This is already well under way in the United Kingdom.

Next restraint of the health budget is passed over to private commissioning alliances made up of doctors and consultants.

This has already happened in the United Kingdom.

Ultimately, the private commissioning consortiums themselves are taken over by private businesses.

In the United Kingdom, over a quarter of the NHS Commissioning Consortiums are being run by the consultancy firm KPMG.

As soon as this third phase is finished, the health services are effectively privatised, with commissioning, control of budgets and provisions of health services all run by private companies.

In Holland, the commissioning of health services and, general constraint of the health budgets were finally taken over by the selfsame KPMG which is taking over commissioning in the United Kingdom.

So, if things carry on going the same as in Holland, just one firm, KPMG, will have all-inclusive control of our National Health Services.

The head of KPMG, Mark Britnell, has already been nominated as a mentor to David Cameron on health and, was on one occasion quoted as saying, ‘The NHS will be shown no mercy’ when it comes to privatisation.

But who precisely are KPMG?

They used to be a component of an international professional service and auditing firm, but in 2002, the Dutch and UK branch of the business were mysteriously sold off to a French group, which still is the owner of them today.

The name of the French firm?

Yes, you’ve guessed it, the firm we all thought we were going to be seeing the back of, ATOS!

This is the firm whose doctors believed that Cerebral Palsy was curable.

ATOS could already be well on the way to taking charge of the NHS budgets and commissioning, just as it has accomplished doing in Holland.

Be extremely scared because in 2007 Atos was suspended from a services contract for the NHS North West and South West after bungling ultrasound scans.

Eight primary care trusts discussed terms on a new contract with Atos through the Department of Health, to supply extra ultrasound scans from the end of December 2006 to the end of March 2007.

Atos was suspended from this agreement prior to it ending. The firm was expected to begin a new and longer contract, but Atos was suspended after a clinical audit established that some patient details were not being accurately documented.

Atos said that they accepted the suspension and, it was not clear when it would begin working on the scans again.

Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia is a condition presented by tiredness and widespread fibrous pain and, it’s one of the most soul destroying illnesses.

There doesn’t appear to be a lot of data on how many instances there are, or maybe no one’s adding it up, but what has been counted is that medication drugs and, in one way or another, is the fourth main cause of death and, most of us know that a medical practitioner’s rebut to any illness is to write a prescription and, give a tablet for it.

In the instance of Fibromyalgic people, the catalogue of pills gets bigger as the illness develops.

A great deal of people with Fibromyalgia report symptoms of Fibromyalgia as a sensation as though they were run over by an eighteen-wheeler truck and, whilst sleep disruptions are common amongst sufferers, it’s not transparent whether sleep difficulties are a manifestation of the condition or one of its causes.

We’ve all been informed about the old saying, ‘Laughter being the best medicine’ and, you might be surprised to hear that medical knowledge in fact backs that up and, that laughter has been demonstrated to cause numerous physiological changes that may be helpful to those with Fibromyalgia.

Laughter hasn’t been investigated specifically for these conditions, but researchers are uncovering more about laughter in general and, in painful disorders such as Cancer and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Fibromyalgia is frequently identified by a medical expert known as a Rheumatologist; as these doctors specialise in Arthritic and Autoimmune disorders and, they can rule out other problems that may have comparable manifestations and, there are no blood tests or x-rays that can tell if a person has Fibromyalgia, but a doctor may use these as part of the diagnostic procedure.

The main diagnostic test involves pressure points; these are particular places on the body that are inclined to be very responsive to gentle pressure among people with Fibromyalgia and, if a number of these pressure points are sensitive and, additional disorders have been ruled out, a doctor may determine Fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia is as well related with sleep disorders and, inadequate sleep, or restless sleep and, all these merely aggravates the illness. For years, doctors thought it a psychosomatic (imaginary) disease, resulting from the misuse of muscles, tension, depression or a dozen other things, but Fibromyalgia itself was disregarded as just a name for a tub full of psychosomatic ailments, varying from a sad childhood to a miserable marriage to reduced physical activity and, a lousy view on life.

Doctors, researchers and, patients all have numerous ideas as to what causes the disorder. A common theme, nevertheless, is that of sleep, as most patients with Fibromyalgia have damaged sleep. Among the chronic ailments that are often associated with Fibromyalgia, almost all have a negative impact on the persons standard of sleep.

An interesting investigation established that when healthy college students had their sleep thrown into disorder on a methodical basis for a number of weeks, a great deal of them fell ill with the signs of Fibromyalgia, then when they were permitted to go back to their previous sleeping habits, the manifestations vanished.

A number of people have undiagnosed sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea and, it’s feasible that such obscure disorders may be linked to the development of Fibromyalgia in some people, but hopefully future analysis will have the solution.

Getting disability from Social Security for Fibromyalgia is almost out of the question, but it can be done, but only after it has demolished a person’s entire well-being, their will to live and their financial affairs. There is no cure for Fibromyalgia. Almost all people are pilled up, and like the living dead so that they can get to sleep at night and, then wake up hung over in the morning from the after affect of the pills.

The neurotransmitters that control how our bodies perceive pain may as well play a part in Fibromyalgia, as might hormone levels and, it’s feasible that the impact of sleep disruption on the development of Fibromyalgia is arbitrated by altered neurotransmitters and/or hormone levels. A number of other causes have as well been put forward, incorporating both constant and severe infections, injuries, emotional trauma and muscle abnormalities.

There are a number of different medications out there that have been used for pain control in patients with Fibromyalgia, not all of them work and, some work very well. As well as medication, some people think that their pain is simply too severe to exercise and, it has been recognised that physical activity can help, but a lot of people find it makes their symptoms worse. Relaxation therapy can assist patients and, Fibromyalgia patients find their own way of managing with the pain, as well as massage therapy and acupuncture and, some people have found that advice and support groups have help them cope with the effect that the disorder has on their lives and families.

Without therapy, Fibromyalgia can deteriorate and, the chronic pain additionally plays havoc on our sleep pattern and, stops people from doing something physical. These alterations in sleep and exercise patterns make the manifestations of Fibromyalgia worse and, between the chronic pain and the isolation resulting from fewer pursuits, depression can often occur. The depression can then, in turn, exacerbate the Fibromyalgia.

When people say exercise, we imagine going down the gym and doing a Cardio workout, but it’s not about that at all.

Just strolling to the end of the street is a start each day and, if it can be accomplished, a few minutes further as we go along, but we don’t have to be sprinting down the road like Sally Gunnell each day, even though every day feels like we’ve been doing the 400 metres hurdle in the Olympic athletics event in track and field.

With Fibromyalgia, every day is a hit and miss day; as we fight to get out of bed in the morning, with our stiff backs and, our stiff neck and, the multitude of pain we go through daily, as we do battle to preserve the final bit of vigour that we’ve got left and, the public’s opinion of how we should be.

But the general public are not the first to drive us into melancholy because they all conform with normality, or what they think is normality and, they merely analyse things the way that suits them, as long as the bodily structure is how they want to see it because no one is sensible enough to realise that anything can happen to anyone at any given time and, if they’re ignorant enough to think that it won’t, then they need to be less discriminatory and, be mindful that even though we’re moderately different, people who have a disability are not another breed.

Nearly all people who regard Fibromyalgia people believe it’s all in their heads, or that they’re just depressed because it’s an illness that can’t be easily seen and, can be difficult to comprehend but people with Fibromyalgia are undergoing actual pain and genuine fatigue and, because people with Fibromyalgia in general seem in good health from the outside, they don’t feel fine from the inside, which sadly tends to extract additional prejudice than compassion.

NHS Patients Too Scared To Protest!

Sick people in hospital are afraid they’ll be treated worse if they speak up about their problems with their care; as stated by the NHS Ombudsman.

In-patients who are afflicted by poor care in hospitals are being let down by a poisonous cocktail inside the health facilities; as claimed by the NHS Ombudsman.

It was claimed that patients were frequently too prettified to make a fuss in case they were given even more inferior medical care and, those that did speak up were faced with a culture of defensiveness from employees when they were merely searching for a reason.

Investigation found one woman who was worried about her mother, who wasn’t being cleaned, or being assisted to the bathroom, was told to put her complaint in writing. She was informed her letter would be answered inside 28 days, but the poor lady could have died in that amount of time.

Dame Julie Mellor is calling for changes so that more concerns are acted on without delay and, measures are taken prior to care being threatened. This would incorporate admission to a free patient guidance service, 24 hours a day and, for every patient to be given a senior person’s name as a first contact for any worries they may have.

It is as well, recommended that patient’s comments are measured regularly so that hospitals can deal with complaints administration to make the system better.

The NHS Ombudsman looks into grievances by people who believe they have been treated unfairly, or had appalling service and, its examination found that the NHS culture meant that those who suffer harm were frequently being refused a straightforward expression of regret.

Approximately half the people who thought about complaining did not and, a great deal were put off because they believed that the process would be too bureaucratic and, others were convinced that it would make no difference.

It was as well found that workers were unwilling to fully investigate complaints because they were frightened of challenging, or holding more senior figures responsible, or of being disciplined for their shortcomings.

This defensiveness is one of the most crucial things people need to defeat and, that it’s about reshaping the discrimination and, not about the course of action we need to take.

There is a complete necessity for an advice service to help patients, but until such time, the NHS seriously needs to look at complaints and learn from those complaints and, to change what’s wrong.

It’s in the interest of everybody who cares about the NHS, from patients, to doctors and nurses, that patients can put one’s trust in somebody when they make a complaint and, that it’s handled properly and meticulously.

There are issues with how hospitals deal with complaints and, that’s why we have a need to carry out inspections on the system and, look forward to the recommendations that are put forward in revising its organisation and, techniques.

Coalition’s Mandatory National IDs and Biometric Systems

I said it was coming and, here it is, the Biometrics System but what is biometrics and, can biometrics be advantageous to the human race, well the Coalition Party seem to believe so because they’ve presently made it obligatory.

Biometrics is the branch of knowledge of determining humans based on distinctive physical attributes and, the government are making use of biometrics, for example, to measure people in the use of biometric passport readers, for the implementation of law enforcement and, biometrics is extremely favoured between security specialists.

Biometrics is a quickly growing division of information technology and, its technologies are automated techniques and means for identification founded on biological behavioural traits of a person.

Biometric methods are becoming a significant gateway for information security systems and, as the UK Government begin to roll out mandatory Biometric Global ID Cards, these will track down and, store our details directly, wherever we go.

What’s the difference between scrapping identity cards, scrapping the National Identity Register and, scrapping the next creation of biometric passports?

At one level, scrapping identity cards is a reasonably inconsequential venture as the card is merely a bit of plastic with restricted functionality and, no web-enabled verification capabilities for card holders, so current information on safety checks for the card need visual and physical examination of the card and, potentially, phoning a telephone hotline to check that the card has not been reported as lost or stolen.

If you select not to have or replenish your passport, your particulars won’t be entered onto the National Identity Register.

Nevertheless, if you freely decide to put in an application for a passport or identity card, then you will automatically have your details enrolled on the National Identity Register and, the fact that you’re not forced to be issued with a plastic identity card does not divert you from that commitment and responsibilities associated with your National Identity Register record.

The Government has persistently insisted that identity cards will not be mandatory for UK nationals and, for nearly all people this is not what they understand when they hear identity cards will not be mandatory for them.

Compulsory National ID Cards will breach vital civil liberties and, increase the control of authorities to lessen your freedoms to those granted by the card.

The Snooper’s Charter never made it through the legislative process, yet the Secretary of State for the Home Department was asking how much her department currently pays, telephone companies, internet service providers and, others yearly for data storage.

The response supplied was a total estimated remittance to the communications industry for these intentions by the Home Office for just one year was £15 million and, in 2013 Edward Snowden’s leaks divulged that the GCHQ has admission to the transatlantic cables that transport the world’s communications and, is intercepting and processing billions of communications every day and sharing information with the US.

This includes recordings of telephone calls, the contents of email communication, archiving on social media sites and, the chronicle of an internet user’s access to websites and, all without the public’s knowledge and agreement.

The project Tempora has been in existence since the start of 2012 and, the leaks as well propose that the US authorities have comparable breath taking and undeviating admission to global communications by way of the world’s largest internet companies. This secretive programme is known as PRISM and reports strongly conveys that the UK also uses this data.

The Communication Capabilities Development Programme (CCDP) is an alliance enterprise to produce an ever-present widespread infiltration programme for the United Kingdom.

It would require the logging of each telephone call, email and text messages between each resident of the United Kingdom and, would record the actual contents of these emails and, is planned to expand beyond the domain of standard telecommunications media and, to log transmissions inside the social networking platforms such as Twitter and Facebook.

The right of expression and, freedom from disturbance are two sides of the same coin and, we need both for full involvement in a parliamentary society. Observation expertise that stops a person to continue to exist as nameless when producing or accessing data, both violate freedom from interference and has a suffocating impact on unencumbered expression.

Methods of identification that use mechanised identification of an individual’s face, fingerprints, or irises are gaining ground worldwide. Biometric ID methods are becoming more and more positioned at the international border checkpoints, by Governments trying to execute national ID schemes and, by the private sector agencies.

The Coalition have definitely altered the romance between citizen and state and, private experts have sounded the alarm that the national database would additionally escort us into a generation of ‘Big Brother’.

It appears that the Governments want to take a transparent dictatorship capacity using the doctrine of authorisation for fundamental freedoms and civil rights and, it’s nothing short of a dictatorship effort to catalogue the people and, no more than a Hitler Regime.

The Tackle And Battle Of The Re-Offender

Reoffending adults only happens because being put into prison for minor offences is an institution in itself and, provides conditioning for prisoners to be set free only to break the law once more, merely because they have been conditioned to do so, not by the prison itself, but by other detainee’s whom they’re associated with whilst in prison.

The solution is not to obstruct our prison system, but to rehabilitate these youngsters outside the prison system because prevention is better than cure.

The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson is giving nearly £2 million in money for an avant-garde project to confront adult reoffending, but what about teenagers who have been put into prison for minor offences?

For the most part, adults reoffending, will go on to reoffend because they’ve been in the system way too long, when something should have been put into place long before this.

It was said that Boris Johnson has given the money, making it sound like he personally put his money into this enterprise. Let’s get this straight, he doesn’t put any of his wealth into any enterprise, but there’s an £18 million kitty that the Mayor’s Office has for Policing and Crime that has been assigned to assist boroughs to tackle crime.

The programme will centre on neglected groups of criminals who serve short prison terms and, who presently receive no official post release help.

Of course, young offenders and adult offenders should have assistance after they depart from the prison establishment because if they don’t, it will only result in them to reoffend once more so that they can feed and clothe themselves, as well as their families because they can’t sustain themselves on fresh air alone.

There are numerous causes why people break the law in the first place and, it’s not that they go out there to specifically do any harm, but it may be because they have a learning disability and, can’t find work, or an employer that is prepared to take them on; consequently, they end up with extremely low self esteem, which in the long term has an effect on them and, their families, causing them to perpetrate an offence.

Each short term offender will be supplied with a key worker who will give uninterrupted assistance from sentencing, to their stay in prison and, through to their release and, the scheme target is to lessen re-conviction percentages for the detainee with a lesser sentence.

It sounds more like they’re going on vacation, rather than being sentenced because they have been declared a nuisance to the community because most of these sentences are because we can’t confront gangs, or lessen brutality against women and children and, anti social behaviour.

In spite of the fact, if we looked back to when things were different, brute force against women and children was an enormous problem, but it was swept under the rug, since a man was considered to be the man of the house and, if he gave his wife a good beating, or the children, it was acceptable behaviour.

Women put up with this type of behaviour previously because there was no such thing as Social Security and, if a women left with her children; she had nowhere to go, because in many cases these families would not put a roof over their heads because it was just something women were meant to put up with.

If a child was abused or sexually assaulted by a family member, then they were scolded for it and, it was said that they were telling a whopper, or it was believed that they were fibbing, perhaps to get attention, which was regularly not the case.

Anti social behaviour became additionally noticeable in the late 1990’s and, it unquestionably became troublesome when children were set free to do as they wanted because the government and Social Services asserted that it was against the law to reprimand your child, allowing children a free leadership and, to do what gratified them.

Pleasure in a child’s life was covered with anti social behaviour for numerous reasons. Punishment for children had been taken away and, children celebrated the sense of being able to do as they pleased and, it motivated them in being aware that their parents could do nothing about it because if they did, the child would then intimidate the parents by saying that they would telephone Social Services.

Children were striking out at their parents as well as friends, family and the general public and, as they done so, this set off a succession of occurrences that shadowed them.

How far do will we go before a parent has no rights over their own child because after all, women are only a cocoon for a living organism, a breeding ground for the embryonic foetus, up till such time it’s born, but as soon as that progeny is born, the government undeniably takes over.

Petty offenders are periodically and sporadically impelled by a network of circumstances. The majority of the time it’s not because they want to carry out the offence, it’s because circumstances force them to.

Of course, not every single circumstance is identical and, it would be unjust to tar everyone with the selfsame brush, which is more than often the case.

There is always a reason why someone does something, there is never not a cause, but what we have to look at, is that whatever the cause, it’s better to put a stop to it before it has grown to such an amount, that in the end, the person who’s life it’s intruded on has to be locked away.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this: