Conservative MPs Threaten Rebellion Over Boris Johnson’s Decision To Water Down The Cap On Social Care Costs

Boris Johnson is facing growing Tory resistance over his decision to water down a new cap on social care costs.

Conservative MPs are demanding the Government rethink a change to the Prime Minister’s social care plans which was slipped out last week.

Small print relating to the reforms means that means-tested support from local authorities for the less well off will no longer count towards the £86,000 cap.

That means they will have to spend more of their own money on care before they reach the lifetime limit.

Andrew Dilnot, the original social care tsar who made recommendations a decade ago on how to improve the sector, blasted the change and said it means the less well off won’t get any benefit from the cap.

A crunch vote on the matter is expected to be held in the House of Commons and the Prime Minister is under pressure to perform a U-turn.

However, Health Secretary Sajid Javid insisted that everyone would be better off under the new system.

It had been hoped that the imposition of a cap on lifetime care costs would spare countless pensioners the prospect of having to sell their homes to pay for residential care.

But the policy paper published by the Government last week revealed that it’s less likely to help those who currently get free support from the State under a means test because that contribution won’t be included in deciding when they’ve reached the cap.

So a poor pensioner getting state support would have to spend £86,000 of their own money on extra care before they were deemed to have hit the limit.

The Government said the move was needed to ensure people didn’t reach the cap at an artificially faster rate than what they contribute.

It said a new much more generous means test, which increases to £100,000 from £23,250 the amount elderly people can hold in assets before they have to pay for all their care themselves was the main means of supporting people with lower levels of assets.

But Andrew Dilnot told the Treasury Select Committee that 40 per cent of the elderly who have care needs will now get no benefit from the cap.

But does anyone believe a word this government says? Perhaps not, but a great number of people still believe what the media tell them.

It’s just another election promise broken, along with stopping illegal immigrants and the triple lock.

We know who will be better off, and I guarantee it won’t be Joe Public, and the next Prime Minister will have a lot of work to undo and the wrongs done by Boris Johnson and his Hannibal crew, and it’s just more lies from Boris and his followers.

And it looks like that in Boris Johnson’s eyes that migrants come first and are in front of the line with their extended families and six-bedroom houses.

When the NHS was first started it promised cradle to grave care and most of the elderly people had home helps who were provided free of charge to do the daily chores that allowed numerous people to continue to live in their own homes quite comfortably. Now, care costs are exorbitant and don’t leave people with any money to pass on to their children – bring back the good old days, please.

It’s just a case of the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer.

Published by Angela Lloyd

My vision on life is pretty broad, therefore I like to address specific subjects that intrigue me. Therefore I really appreciate the world of politics, though I have no actual views on who I will vote for, that I will not tell you, so please do not ask! I am like an observation station when it comes to writing, and I simply take the news and make it my own. I have no expectations, I simply love to write, and I know this seems really odd, but I don't get paid for it, I really like what I do and since I am never under any pressure, I constantly find that I write much better, rather than being blanketed under masses of paperwork and articles that I am on a deadline to complete. The chances are, that whilst all other journalists are out there, ripping their hair out, attempting to get their articles completed, I'm simply rambling along at my convenience creating my perfect piece. I guess it must look pretty unpleasant to some of you that I work for nothing, perhaps even brutal. Perhaps I have an obvious disregard for authority, I have no idea, but I would sooner be working for myself, than under somebody else, excuse the pun! Small I maybe, but substantial I will become, eventually. My desk is the most chaotic mess, though surprisingly I know where everything is, and I think that I would be quite unsuited for a desk job. My views on matters vary and I am extremely open-minded to the stuff that I write about, but what I write about is the truth and getting it out there, because the people must be acquainted. Though I am quite entertained by what goes on in the world. My spotlight is mostly to do with politics, though I do write other material as well, but it's essentially politics that I am involved in, and I tend to concentrate my attention on that, however, information is essential. If you have information the possibilities are endless because you are only limited by your own imagination...

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: