Ulez Cameras Now Have Their Own Personal Security Feature

Mobile Ulez cameras are being protected by dedicated security units in a bid to stop vandals.

Footage was shared on social media of an activist approaching a man and a woman sitting in a red Renault Clio and asking if they were security, prompting one of them to nod.

The activist then says that there were two of them and this was public money, and that they were just keeping an eye on it to make sure no one smashes it.

In response, the male guard shook his head. A newspaper outlet has contacted Transport for London, which operates the Ulez scheme, to ask whether security teams now protect all mobile Ulez cameras.

Vandals were out in force, with images from Dartford, southeast London, showing a set of traffic lights equipped with a Ulez camera that had been knocked over onto a pavement.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan defended the controversial policy during a UN climate summit in New York by describing it as the best ever two-for-one offer, adding that the same things that cause climate change cause air pollution.

He said, that nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and carbon emissions. If you deal with one, you deal with the other. But Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said Sadiq Khan’s measures were not proving effective.

He told BBC London that the problem with the mayor’s plan is that it does nothing for climate change, and was actually very poor air pollution and that it was costing the people a fortune.

Neil Garratt, leader of the Conservative group in the London Assembly, said that he was alarmed to hear the mayor claim that expanding Ulez would cut carbon emissions. He said that it wouldn’t and he knew that because his own report spells it out, so why was Sadiq Khan claiming otherwise at the conference?

The Mayor expended Ulez to cover the entirety of London several weeks ago, clobbering thousands more motorists with the £12.50 day-to-day charge.

Footage emerged of a protester climbing a ladder to block a camera on top of a Transport for London van on Rainham Road in east London, with locals rallying around the man, with one writing on Facebook: ‘Let’s hear it for the lad sitting on the ladders blocking the Ulez camera on Rainham Road. This made my morning, power to the people.’

Elsewhere in Ickenham, in the borough of Hillingdon, vigilante vandals sprayed foam used for filling cracks and insulating lofts over two cameras, stopping it from catching motorists.

How much is this boneheadedness costing the taxpayer? Evidently, there’s no fixing stupid!

Sadiq Khan said it was a great two-for-one offer as it tackled both air quality and climate change. In that case, why didn’t he attend the conference in New York by video link? Without a doubt, his words don’t match his actions.

Could it be that it’s because green issues are an excuse, and that Ulez is about raising money and the New York trip was about spending money on a wonderful work jolly?

This is all coming out of the taxpayer’s money, which is our money, and who gave Sadiq Khan a license to waste it? These people guarding the cameras must have an extremely low moral threshold.

This is what dictatorship looks like folks!

And how did Sadiq Khan get to New York to do his address? Did he grow some wings, not of course not, he flew by aircraft. What does he think that an aeroplane doesn’t emit pollution? What fantasy world does he live in?

Russell Brand’s Sex Assault Claim Is Being Investigated By Met Police

The Metropolitan Police says it’s investigating a report of sexual assault in Soho in 2003 after allegations were levied against Russell Brand, as the comedian suspended the remaining dates of his latest tour.

On Saturday, a newspaper outlet and Channel 4’s Dispatches reported allegations of abusive and predatory behaviour including rape, sexual assault and emotional abuse said to have been committed by the presenter between 2006 and 2013.

Russell Brand completely repudiates the allegations and insists all his relationships had been consensual, taking to the stage on Saturday for his Bipolarisation tour as expected.

But on Monday promoters for the tour confirmed that the remaining dates in Windsor, Plymouth and Wolverhampton had been shelved.

They said in a statement that they were postponing those few remaining addiction charity fundraiser shows. They didn’t like doing it, but they knew people would understand.

The alleged sexual assault evidently took place in Soho three years before the four sexual assaults that Russell Brand has been accused of between 2006 and 2013.

A spokesperson for the Met said that on Sunday, 17 September, the Met received a report of a sexual assault which was alleged to have taken place in Soho in central London in 2003.

The spokesperson said that officers are in contact with the woman and will be providing her with support, and said that they first spoke with the Sunday Times on Saturday, 16 September and had since made further approaches to The Sunday Times and Channel 4 to ensure that anyone who believes they’ve been the victim of a sexual offence is aware of how to report this to the police.

They said they will continue to encourage anyone who believes they may have been a victim of a sexual offence, no matter how long ago it was, to contact them.

Allegations of historic sexual abuse demand detailed and professional handling. They frequently come out of the blue leaving the accused and their families feeling dumbfounded and devastated.

There’s no time limit on when sexual offences can be prosecuted in the United Kingdom, and of course, historic abuse is not treated any less seriously by the police or the courts.

There are far too many people who have been accused of a crime, even though there’s been no DNA evidence. They spend years in prison and then it’s discovered that they were always innocent, and they never actually caught the real perpetrator who’s probably out there, roaming the streets.

Anybody can accuse somebody else of rape or sexual assault, but it doesn’t always mean they did the crime. It might seem like a clear-cut case of sexual assault. However, a case should not be determined by what one believes, but rather by what the investigation reveals and what can be established 100 per cent.

DNA analysis has had an unprecedented impact on the criminal justice system for an extremely long time. It has driven investigations along and made prosecuting those alleged to have perpetrated the offence easier.

Science can now provide focus or direction to an investigation. Help develop a case theory, and clear suspects or those wrongfully convicted with more certainty. As a result, the criminal justice community has become highly reliant on DNA analysis, and it also permits those who have died because of a sexual act to talk for themselves through that DNA.

If I was on a jury for a sexual assault, I would want to see DNA analysis, and many juries and lawyers alike expect to see DNA evidence presented during a trial, but with historical sexual assault there is no DNA, so putting it bluntly we have to look at the evidence that the victims have given in court and try to determine if the suspected perpetrator is guilty or not. It’s a bit like being at the casino, rolling the dice and hoping that your dice rolls right.

But what happens in a “he said, she said” case? Or what about a case where there is no DNA available because it’s historical? What do we do, roll the dice and hope that we made the right decision in putting a person in prison and then finding out years later they were completely innocent?

On the 9th June 2010, during PMs Questions, Prime Minister David Cameron admitted that between 8-10 per cent of all rape allegations were false.

These were ones proved to be false, but how many more fall through the net putting innocent men in prison for offences they did not commit?

Sadly, over the past 25 years, justice in this area of criminal activity has been manipulated to convict more efficiently than in any other area of criminality, and the rights of the defendant have diminished and it’s ‘justice at any price’, and it has ensured that more innocents have been locked up more than ever before.

The problem with our legal system starts with the first steps you take in the courtroom. You’re escorted into a glass enclosure, then locked in with a security guard for company, and this is how the jury first sees you, looking guilty.

And that’s a wrap, folks!

A Secret Trip To Maui By Ivanka Trump To Feed Wildfire Victims

Ivanka Trump made a secret trip to Maui a few weeks ago to distribute meals and critical supplies to residents still recuperating from the devasting wildfires.

The former first daughter joined CityServe International on a humanitarian mission where they distributed 250,000 prepackaged meals for displaced families affected by the biggest wildfire in US history.

They visited a Lahaina church that’s acting as a food pantry and met with residents who are working to rebuild their lives.

Dressed in a blank tank top and green cargo pants, Trump sported a name tag that read ‘Iva’ as she distributed fresh produce locally grown in Maui.

During her visit, Ivanka Trump hands out fresh vegetables, delivers prepackaged supplies and poses for photographs.

CityServe said in a statement that her humble presence lifted spirits and reminded the people of Lahaina that they’re not forgotten.

CityServe said that amidst the tears being shed, there were tangible signs of hope and love, and with the arrival of meals and supplies, their partners and team alongside Ivanka Trump were hefting boxes of supplies, consoling survivors, and passing out meals to those who’d lost everything.

There are about 6,000 displaced residents staying in Maui hotels, while another 1,100 are in Airbnb rentals.

CityServe said that Ivanka Trump and the group distributed food, water, local produce, gift cards and other needed supplies to displaced families and individuals staying at hotels, local distribution centres and pantries near Lahaina.

The group was also providing gas cards and air filters to residents, who were being urged not to drink the water and stay away from fire-damaged areas.

According to CityServe, Trump also used her connections to get other companies to donate goods to those in Maui.

Next week, a 747 loaded with $1 million worth of supplies will head toward Maui with e-bikes, electric scooters, electronics, toys, dry foods, small appliances, ukuleles, and several pallets of Jockey clothing, all because of Ivanka’s connections, the group said.

The wildfires are under control across the island but damage remains in the 2,170 acres burned. The death toll stands at 97 and 66 people remain missing.

The burn area of Maui remains restricted to authorised personnel as officials clean up the potentially dangerous ash and other debris. There are an estimated 2,200 damaged or destroyed structures.

The cleanup could take months. The early cost estimation is $5.5 billion.

Ivanka Trump not only helps these people but she also does it with a smile on her face. However, it does make me wonder if she does this good deed out of the kindness of her heart, or does she get paid for doing it?

This was supposed to be a secret trip to Maui, yet she ended up on the front page of a newspaper outlet, but then these things do tend to get leaked to the media, and given that she didn’t give her full name, but rather a nickname suggests that she was there to help, and not there to film footage for a self-promotional mockumentary.

Unfortunately, there are some extremely judgemental people out there. Someone does something good for a change and people get all angry about it, and let’s face it, she’d done more than most of us have.

However, Ivanka Trump has lived a charmed life. She hung about with an ambitious cohort of young girls, most of whom lived in grand townhouses or duplexes.

She wasn’t like most girls and if she wanted to go out it was always under the supervision of her father’s security team, borrowing his father’s credit card to go shopping.

Ivanka spent her career creating and exemplifying a more polished and intellectual offshoot of the Trump trademark. She was more sophisticated, and not as grandiloquent or nouveau riche as her father had perfected, and Ivanka was courteous, classy, and fun to be around when she was in the public eye.

However, in private, the harsher, more Trumpian edges sometimes poked out.

She never wore a Halloween ensemble that wasn’t flattering, which meant that she usually showed up at costume parties looking gorgeous and uninteresting. She always stopped at McDonald’s for cheeseburgers, and she swore, and of course, she had the Trump radar for status, money, power and her father’s instinct to throw others under the bus to protect herself.

RUSSELL BRAND AND ACCUSATION

Russell Brand has been accused of rape, and he’s been accused of raping a businesswoman and grooming a 16-year-old schoolgirl for sex.

At the moment it’s all accusation. However, the Metropolitan Police have said that they’ve been made aware of the media information about a string of allegations of sexual aggression, and have urged any alleged victims to come forward.

Allegedly, one woman has said that Russell Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. Another, whom he evidently referred to as ‘the child’, told how the presenter targeted her when she was 16 years old and still at school, and he was aged 30.

But in an impressive fight back, Russell Brand took to social media to completely deny this string of extremely serious criminal allegations.

The rebellious Russell Brand still performed a London gig, telling his cheering audience of 2,000 fans that he loved them.

I’m not saying that he did or did not do what he’s been accused of. In fact, I would rather sit on the fence for this one, and perhaps we will never know. After all, the media only tells you what you want to believe.

Russell Brand has been out there a lot, revealing a lot concerning government and media criminality and World agendas. It could be that they just want him to shut up. After all, it seems extremely easy these days to ‘cancel’ people.

Russell Brand has not been criminally charged and there’s no indication at this point that the police are actively investigating these claims.

There’s no doubt that when he was younger that he was extremely promiscuous, but that doesn’t make him a rapist, does it?

However, the former Tory Justice Secretary Robert Buckland has called for the BBC and Channel 4 to investigate allegations about Russell Brands conduct, and that they should ask themselves if any red flags were raised at the time.

Sadly, we live in a society where a man can be branded a rapist by accusation alone, and that’s where tyranny lies.

People shouldn’t be treated as criminals unless they’re convicted as criminals, and this includes Russell Brand.

I certainly don’t believe in trial by accusation, and you should be innocent until proven guilty.

Accusations destroy men’s careers.

Accusations from 18 years ago aren’t proof, it’s just one person’s word, and that’s not enough to condemn a man. It’s historic, it’s archaic and shouldn’t even be allowed in court unless there’s DNA evidence to establish that he did what those people and media said he’d done.

We need hard evidence to prove that Russell Brand did this. Evidence he did this, then he deserves to go to jail, lack of evidence, then leave it alone, and victims of sexual misdemeanours would be more believable if they didn’t wait such a long time to make their accusations.

Even if these faceless women who’ve accused Russell Brand of rape came forward, where’s the evidence?

That says it all really. Russell Brand gets plastered everywhere for an accusation, yet politicians and such get a free pass with side-eyeing as if they let off a fart in a crowded room.

Make your own mind up!

Middle England’s Streets Choked By Green Obsession

Streets across Britain are being choked with weeds as councils abandon a chemical spray they claim harms wildlife.

Numerous roads which have been well cared for decades have grown into mini jungles over the summer as some councils have stopped using the chemical glyphosate and say other treatments are less effective.

Other councils blame the rainy summer, which restricted spraying, and admit they stopped weeding to trim costs.

Yet middle-class homes have been hit by massive hikes in council tax, pushing the average Band D bill exceeding 2,000 a year.

Some fed-up residents have formed their own weeding patrols.

Yvonne Wright, who’s formed a Civic Pride Team of pensioners to do the job of council contractors in Tottington, in Bury, Greater Manchester said that these plants taking over feels like a scene from The Day of the Triffids.

They use their gardening instruments to eliminate the weeds.

Ms Wright said that their town used to look fantastic but the spread of weeds had been dreadful, and there was a lot of anger because people have highly rated homes for council tax.

Bury Council said weed treatment was expected to get back on track this month after the wet summer made spraying impossible.

In the adorable Victorian terraced streets of Merton, south London weeds are growing up to waist height in places.

Mother of two Laura Montero, 47, said that everyone takes it on themselves to do something about the weeds.

Fellow resident Daisy Laramy-Binks, 37, added that with a lot of the nettles, you’ll get out of your car and sting yourself.

Only 200 yards down the road, which is in the neighbouring area of Wandsworth, residents have spruced up weed-strawn streets by planting flowers around the bottom of trees outside their homes.

In Cambridgeshire, Tory councillor Simon Bywater said he’s had more complaints about weeds than any other issue over the last decade.

He said that people expect councils to look after roads and pavements. It’s one of the basic services for which they pay their taxes.

In Suffolk, accounts clerk Annabel Young, 27, said streets near her Ipswich home look like ‘something from a post-apocalypse disaster movie in which plants start taking over’.

Councils don’t need weed killers, there are plenty of prisoners or those on probation who could do the work. These people could be used to cover these tasks the council say they can’t afford to carry out. The list is infinite.

The trouble is they don’t have enough staff to take prisoners to do their day-to-day tasks, and they’re slammed up for 23 hours a day – another area that’s a governmental disaster zone.

Councils are now attempting to save money, that’s what it’s all about, and then they go on to spend that money on diversity projects.

Our government are happy to support the war going on in Ukraine, but they can’t mend the potholes and cut the weeds.

What they don’t realise or they’re just very stupid is that it’s going to cost the council a fortune in trips and falls as paving slabs start to lift and become uneven.

They may save money now, but in the long run, the roots of some of these plants will destroy the paving, so that when the roads really need to be done, it will cost councils much more and be much more harmful to the environment, with new materials required, lorries coming and going, heavy equipment for the rebuilding of roads.

Yes, of course, we have to protect the wildlife, but we can’t be plagued with weeds either, especially when they’re blocking the view of roundabouts and junctions.

Four Ministers Were Forced To Fly 400 Miles To King’s Private Scottish Mansion For A Taxpayer-Funded Meeting!

The King was facing criticism last night for forcing four Cabinet Ministers, including the Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, to fly 400 miles to his private mansion in Scotland for a taxpayer-funded meeting.

He was accused of wasting an excessive amount of money and climate hypocrisy because the meeting was held partly to formally appoint the new Net Zero Minister in charge of cutting carbon emissions.

Jeremy Hunt, Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, Privy Council President Penny Mordaunt and Energy and Net Zero Secretary Claire Coutinho all flew on the same aircraft to Ayrshire for the Privy Council meeting on Friday at the taxpayers’ expense.

Ordinarily, Privy Council meetings are held monthly at Buckingham Palace or Windsor, but the King held the meeting at Dumfries House to coincide with a party on Friday night to celebrate the 15th anniversary of the public opening of the property, which he purchased for £45 million in 2007.

The King is a well-known climate campaigner and yesterday morning opened a sustainable farming skills centre on the Dumfries House estate.

A few hours later he appeared to have flown to Doncaster racecourse, 230 miles away.

Last night former Lib Dem MP Norman Baker, himself a Privy Council member, said the King’s decision to host a meeting of the council in Scotland ‘drives a coach and horses through any claim he has to be interested in the environment’, adding that this was an outrageous waste of money by King Charles.

A Government spokesman refused to say how much the flight cost or if the aircraft was private or commercial, but emphasised that value for money was a priority.

Charles has been living off the taxpayer and spoiled all his life, even before he was King, and why is he meddling? He’s the King and shouldn’t be interfering in politics.

However, it is his Government, and it’s his consent that forms each government, but should he be meddling, no not really. He gives consent to form a government. That doesn’t give him the privilege to run it.

The King of England doesn’t come across as an extremely smart man, but when it comes to his own entitlement, he’s very smart.

Intellect and academic accomplishments don’t feature prominently on the King’s Curriculum Vitae, but when becoming a royal it’s never been needed.

He lives a privileged life, gets waited on hand and foot and has the very best of everything, so I’d say he hasn’t done bad, smart or not!

People are going to fly, but it’s actually not a good look when you’re taking helicopters and planes to get around when you claim you’re concerned about the environment. In fact, they’re not concerned in the slightest, which makes them hypocrites.

The great King, the eco-warrior, who obviously isn’t that concerned at all. He just wants to tell all us peasants how to live, but not follow his own lifestyle choices.

Clearly, King Charles doesn’t know how to use Zoom, which could have easily been used for the meeting, or better still, schedule the meeting for when he’s back in London, otherwise, it looks like he’s saying, ‘do as I say, not as I do’.

The government told us that ‘we are all in this together’, what a joke that is. Someone should tell them about the poverty and foodbanks in the United Kingdom. That’s like saying, ‘All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others’.

It’s not about climate change. Their top objective is to control by using climate change as a justification.

A Family Finds The Skeletal Remains Of A Baby Boy In A Suitcase As They Clear Out Their Loft

An inquest heard that a family found the skeletal remains of a baby boy concealed in a suitcase while they were clearing out their loft.

The unnamed baby was discovered in the attic of a semi-detached property on Berwick Avenue in Heaton Mersey, Stockport on March 6 last year.

A police investigation, including DNA analysis of the remains, failed to establish the exact time of death but did reveal that it could have occurred as long ago as 1959.

Details of the grim discovery emerged after an inquest was formally opened into the death at Stockport Coroners’ Court on Wednesday morning.

Police coroners’ officer Claire Smith told senior coroner Alison Mutch the identity of the baby hadn’t yet been established, although DNA analysis of the skeletal remains had revealed they belonged to a male infant.

The coroners’ office also agreed that the time of death was unascertained, broadly speaking.

The hearing was told ‘mitochondrial DNA testing’ had been carried out, but that they didn’t think that provided a link to the family that resided there, said Ms Mutch and the coroners’ officer agreed.

The hearing was told that a Home Office pathologist had carried out a post-mortem examination, but they were unable to provide a cause of death.

Ms Mutch said that she thought the family were clearing the address and they found a suitcase within the property in one of the rooms. When they opened it these remains were found in it, and police coroners’s officer Smith said that was correct.

Ms Mutch said it appeared the remains were quite old, and that the range was thought probably dating back to 1959, and Ms Smith agreed.

The hearing was told a police investigation was ongoing. After formally opening the inquest proceedings, the coroner adjourned the case for another hearing on September 26.

Residents in Berwick Avenue expressed their surprise following the hearing. One person said police descended on the property in March last year.

The resident said that the police were there for a few days.

The resident said that the last they heard was that it was a false alarm and that it was just a bundle of newspapers that were found. Obviously, that’s wrong.

Greater Manchester Police said at the time of the discovery, shortly after 11.30 am (6 March 2022), they were called to a report of remains found at an address on Berwick Avenue in Stockport.

They said that the remains were believed to be historical and there was no evidence to suggest that the find links to any other ongoing investigation and that enquiries were ongoing.

Surely somebody must have emptied out the attic space over the 65 years that the body had been there. However, we don’t even know how many owners the house has seen. Perhaps the previous occupants died and left the body there, or anyone who had been living there.

People put things in their loft and just forget about it, although I would guess it wouldn’t be too difficult to forget that you left a dead baby in a suitcase in your attic, and considering the nature of the contents in the suitcase it would have probably been well concealed.

Whatever or however it happened I’m sure there’s an extremely heartbreaking story behind this, and perhaps someone out there knows the truth.

The houses in Berwick Avenue only look like they were built in the late 1970s or 1980s, so perhaps the suitcase was brought to the house by the previous owners.

A 19-Year-Old Woman Who Fought Doctors Who Wanted To Withdraw Life-Saving Treatment Has Died – But Can’t Be Identified

A courageous teenager who was locked in a legal battle with doctors who wanted to withdraw her life-preserving treatment has tragically died, but still can’t be named.

The 19-year-old woman, anonymised by the courts as ‘ST’, can’t be identified because of Draconian reporting rules which have shrouded her heartbreaking case in secrecy.

Her distraught family said on Thursday that even now, in their hour of grief, they continue to be gagged by the court order from saying her name aloud.

They vowed to continue fighting for justice for their fearless daughter to bring what’s been done in the dark into light.

The teenager, who had a rare degenerative condition, died after suffering a cardiac arrest on Tuesday, just days after speaking anonymously to a newspaper outlet about her ordeal from her hospital bed.

Extraordinarily, despite her death, the blanket rules which prohibit the media from identifying ‘ST’ or anything about her and her family or citing the hospital concerned, still stand.

Her devastated parents said that they’ve lost their beautiful and courageous daughter, known to the world as ‘ST’. But to them, she has a real name.

They added that to her family she was everything and that they would cherish and never forget the 19 years they had with her.

They said that the past year had been one of struggle, even torture, for ‘ST’ and her family at the hands of the hospital and the Courts of Protection.

Her family has vowed that her death isn’t the end and said they will continue to fight for ‘ST’s right to be identified and for her full story to be known.

‘ST’ suffered from mitochondrial depletion syndrome, the same condition as that of baby Charlie Gard, whose life support was removed following a painful court battle over his treatment in 2017.

‘ST’ had lived a somewhat independent life before she was hospitalised last year after contracting COVID-19, which worsened her degenerative illness.

The previously outgoing teenager, who enjoyed watching Love Island and coffee with friends, was left reliant on a ventilator, a feeding tube and regular dialysis.

Despite her difficulties, the outstanding straight-A student was determined to live long enough to travel to North America for potentially life-extending clinical trials of nucleoside therapy.

However, ‘ST’ was barred from fundraising for the £1.5 million costs because of the reporting restrictions requested by her hospital when it took her to court to remove her life-preserving treatment in April.

This young woman battled to the very end. She was such a courageous young lady, but this fight needs to continue so that others can’t be treated like this.

Shame on the courts, shame on the politicians, shame on the NHS. Hope her struggles will never be forgotten because the NHS is out of control. Who on earth gave them this much power?

The NHS used every means at their disposal, and no doubt a great deal of public money to prevent this young woman and her family from seeking treatment elsewhere, they must be so proud of themselves. Yes, this young lady was extremely sick, but the NHS are even sicker.

The United Kingdom is turning more and more into a dictatorship. I hate to think what this country will be like in say thirty years’ time, and what has this world come to when a dying teenager isn’t allowed to have the freedom to identify herself or speak freely?

I just don’t understand why the court still has a gagging order, now that this young lady is dead. The parents obviously want to speak openly about their daughter. At least the hospital should be named and shamed and the same goes for the judge who ordered the gagging order. This judge evidently had no understanding or belief in the freedom of speech of an individual.

After Strangling Gabby Petito To Death, Brian Laundrie Sent A Callous Text To A Friend

Brian Laundrie exchanged cruel text messages with a friend days after he choked his fiancee Gabby Petito to death on a cross-country road trip.

Brian Laundrie, 23, killed Gabby Petito on or about August 28 in Wyoming before he took his own life out of guilt and her remains were discovered in Grand Teton National Park on September 19.

However, he sent a string of text messages, seen by The Messenger, to a friend named Ben on September 4 and pretended everything was okay.

‘Trip was good,’ he wrote after he returned home to Florida. ‘Gab and I had fun. Tired now, gonna sleep for a week.’

The exchange of messages between Brian Laundrie and his friend Ben didn’t indicate anything was amiss.

‘We made a lot of content,’ he wrote in relation to the couple’s YouTube travel channel. ‘It was once in a lifetime.’

Gabby Petito spent the summer travelling with Brian Laundrie in a white van, recording their experiences before she vanished.

He returned to his parents’ home in Florida on September 1 without Gabby Petito and her family reported her missing on September 11.

Brian Laundrie was named by police as a person of interest in her disappearance.

Gabby Petito’s strangled body was discovered in Wyoming’s Grand Teton National Park shortly after.

Before he could be arrested, Brian Laundrie was discovered dead in Myakkahatchee Creek Environmental Park in Florida.

A notebook was discovered in which he admitted to killing her and claimed he did it to end her pain after she fell.

‘I ended her life,’ Laundrie wrote. ‘I thought it was merciful, that it is what she wanted, but I see now all the mistakes I made. I panicked, I was in shock.’

But days before Gabby Petito’s death, the couple were questioned by police in Moab, Utah after a member of the public contacted 911 and said they’d gotten into a physical argument.

Officers separated them for the night but no charges were filed.

Gabby Petito’s parents filed a $50 million suit against the Moab City Police Department for failing to arrest Brian Laundrie after they discovered Gabby Petito blooded and in distress following a fight days before her death.

The lawsuit cited transcripts of a discussion between a Moab police officer who pulled over the couple after receiving a call from Gabby Petito that claimed she was being attacked by Brian Laundrie.

Clearly, Brian Laundrie was a coward to have taken his own life. He should have owned up to what he’d done and given himself up to the police instead.

He didn’t take his life out of guilt, he took his life out of cowardice because he didn’t want to face the consequences of his actions, and his parents enabled this and they’re just as responsible as he was.

I still can’t believe that his parents got off scot-free. They enabled him, concealed him, deceived and misdirected police so that he could get home, and then pretended they didn’t even know he’d gone.

Brian Laundrie was a violent abuser and Gabby Petito was his prey.

She should have requested or pushed for him to be arrested that day. She definitely didn’t deserve what he did to her. They might have both been fighting with each other, but she didn’t deserve to die either.

She was clearly the victim of narcissistic abuse, and what abusers do is not just immoral, it’s callous and in this matter deadly.

The text to his friend Ben is even further proof that Brian Laundrie felt no guilt, but he knew the walls were closing in on him, and he knew he would never survive prison so he offed himself.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started