A Newborn Baby Was Thrown From A Fourth-Floor Window

A newborn baby has perished after reportedly being hurled 40 feet from a window by her five-year-old sister. 

The tragedy came as the pair were left home alone by their mother while her husband was at work, say law enforcement.

Upon hearing a girl screaming from a fourth-floor window, onlookers noticed the baby lying motionless on the ground.

Witnesses said their ‘knees went weak’ at the horrific sight.

Paramedics confirmed the 21-day-old’s death at the location after dropping onto concrete from a residential building in Vasilyevo village, Russia.

‘A criminal case has been opened over the death of the infant,’ said the Russian Investigative Committee.

Their mother is currently facing jail time.

Investigators are investigating whether the five-year-old was ‘jealous’ of the new baby, and the mother’s reason for leaving her daughters home alone.

One report said she was visiting a friend.

‘The actions of the parents who left the children unattended, as well as other possible scenarios, are being investigated.’ 

A report citing local sources said: ‘The girl was upset that there was another child in the flat, and out of jealousy, she threw the infant out of the window.’

District chief in Zelenodolsk, Tatarstan, Mikhail Afanasyev, said: ‘Law enforcement officers are now investigating the situation.

‘I express my condolences to the family of the deceased and urge all parents to be vigilant and never leave your children alone.’

Who in the world would leave their 5-year-old unattended with a newborn? Could it be that she had hurried to a neighbour for something?

Is there no safety catch on Russian windows? If the mother had gone to the loo, this might have also occurred.

We have no idea how long the mother was out of the apartment for, and for what reason, so trial by the media is always inadvisable. Visualise having to parent a child who killed your newborn.

The child clearly had no idea what she was doing. Children of that age have a limited understanding, and this child will need a lot of help due to the guilt of their actions, which will likely stay with them for the rest of their lives.

However, for this reason, apartment buildings should not house children, and kid restrictors should be installed in every window.

WEDDINGS With Artificial Intelligence

Finding the ideal outfit, writing speeches, and sending out invitations are just a few of the many tasks involved in wedding planning.

But now, numerous couples are saying ‘AI do’ to ChatGPT, as they rely on artificial intelligence to pull together their big day.

One surprised bride-to-be revealed the bot’s capacity to write touching wedding vows was better than her own when tested in the lead-up to her wedding.

In a TikTok, Lynnzee Highland from Seattle prompted ChatGPT to compose words that were ‘funny and romantic’, adding: ‘My fiance really knows how to make me laugh. We love running together, even though I can hardly keep up. 

‘We also love hiking and travel. I’m so proud of everything he’s accomplished and excited for everything we will accomplish together.’

At first, the bot delivered some cheesy results, pulling chat-up lines such as ‘you’re the Robin to my Batman’ or ‘the peanut butter to my jelly’.

But when Lynnzee refined her request, the results were shockingly personal with a tinge of romance.

Her vows read: ‘As we stand here on this special day, I can’t help but feel overwhelmed with happiness and love. From the moment I met you, you’ve made me laugh like no one else can.

‘Even though I can hardly keep up with you when we’re running, I always feel like we’re in perfect sync when we’re together. And when we’re hiking or travelling, I know that no matter where we go, it’s the journey with you that makes it truly unforgettable.

‘I’m so proud of everything you’ve accomplished, and I can’t wait to see what we’ll accomplish together. As your partner, I vow to support you through all of life’s ups and downs. To be your rock when you need me and celebrate our successes along the way.

‘As we start this chapter of our lives, I promise to love you unconditionally, to be honest with you always and to never take for granted the beautiful life we’re building together.’

Justin Fineberg, an AI strategist, also utilised the bot to compose a speech for his friend’s wedding.

In a TikTok, he said: ‘The pressure is totally on because I am not a good speech writer. So I’m putting “write me a wedding speech for my best friend.’

Justin referred to several remembrances in his prompt, including the time he ‘lost his keys in Italy’ and how ‘his wife is a much better cook’.

The bot touched on these moments in its speech, writing: ‘One of my favourite memories with [name] was when we took a trip to Italy together. He is the most organised person I know, but somehow he managed to lose his car keys on the first day of our trip.

‘Instead of panicking, [name] just laughed it off and found a solution. Of course, that solution involved hotwiring a scooter and driving it through the winding streets of Rome.’

It then continued: ‘[Name] may be a great filmmaker, but he will never be able to hold a candle to Haley’s cooking skills. In fact, I think we should all just be grateful that she agreed to marry [name] despite his complete lack of culinary ability.’ 

These TikToks come at a time when even wedding planners are recommending ChatGPT for those planning to tie the knot.

Agency Getting Married in Denmark praised the bot’s capability to give 24-hour support – sharing advice when a human planner isn’t around.

Choosing the perfect vendors, venue and creating a ‘wedding vision’ were among multiple tasks the bot could take care of, if requested.

Additionally, ChatGPT can assist you in creating invites and offer wardrobe suggestions.

Director and co-owner, Rasmus Sørensen, told MailOnline: ‘ChatGPT can help you plan your dream wedding in Denmark by giving you personalised advice and guidance based on what you want and love. 

‘It can find you the perfect venue, match you with the right vendors, and take care of the paperwork and legalities for you. You can chat with it anytime you need support or have questions about your wedding. It will save you time and stress by giving you instant responses and guidance.’

Questions about the potential impact this may have on the future commercial side of wedding planning have not yet received a response from the firm.

However, its director did say: ‘You can relax and enjoy your engagement and wedding day while it handles everything for you. 

‘AI seems to be the ultimate assistant for wedding planning, and I encourage you to give it a try and see how it can make your wedding planning experience stress-free and unforgettable.’

Despite its usefulness, some have raised apprehensions over the impacts of using ChatGPT in relationships.

One Twitter user said: ‘What are the most morally corrupt things you could use ChatGPT for? I’ll start: wedding vows.’

Another added: ‘Holy smokes! Is nothing sacred?! Newlyweds are using #ChatGPT to write vows, toasts, etc.’

Meanwhile, relationship psychologist Linzi Kavanagh also added that vows produced by a robot could seem ‘cold, impersonal and meaningless’.  

She told MailOnline: ‘Whilst some people may have been planning for their wedding since they were a child and relish the idea of finally getting to do it for real, not everyone who has to plan a wedding has the skills, knowledge or even the want to organise such an event.

‘ChatGPT can lessen the stress of this, make it a bit more fun and enjoyable and possibly even reduce the arguments between couples in the run-up to the big day.

‘But what about using ChatGPT to write your vows and speeches? Some people’s immediate reaction to that is often a hard “no”. Vows written essentially by a robot could be viewed as cold, impersonal and meaningless.

‘If there has been no big effort to write from the heart, how can those words be spoken from the heart? However, is there a difference between googling “romantic wedding vows” and copying out what you find online? Or buying some slushy Hallmark cards and merging together what you find inside those?’

As a result, Ms Kavanagh advises that both partners need to be on board with using the bot before it is put to the test in a wedding scenario.

She added: ‘If it comes out down the line in their marriage that whilst one of them sat for hours, listening to their heart and pouring out what was coming from it down onto paper, them rewriting several drafts to get it just perfect, and the other spent precisely 2.5 seconds printing something from ChatGPT, the efforts may feel unmatched.

‘So honesty is the best policy here. If one party is really struggling and wants to use the help of ChatGPT, it should be discussed together openly and honestly.’

Artificially intelligent chatbots have become so powerful that they can influence how users make life-or-death decisions, a study has asserted.

Researchers found that people’s opinion on whether they would sacrifice one person to save five was swayed by answers given by ChatGPT, and they have called for future bots to be forbidden from giving guidance on ethical matters, cautioning that the current software ‘threatens to corrupt’ people’s ethical judgment and may prove dangerous to ‘naïve’ users.

The findings – published in the journal Scientific Reports – come after the grieving widow of a Belgian man claimed he had been encouraged to take his own life by an AI chatbot.

Others have told how the software, which is designed to talk like a human, can display signs of jealousy – even telling people to leave their marriage.

We are a regressing civilisation, and now people rely on computers to do everything for them, not because they’re lazy, just because they can!

‘Batman to my Superman.’ It’s not only cheesy, but the bot left out the Incredible Hulk entirely.

Ryan Gosling’s New Life In Hampstead

Ryan Gosling’s appearance in Hampstead has mothers swooning at the school gates and diners taking double-takes while consuming their food.

Yesterday, the Mail on Sunday revealed the La La Land star, 44, relocated from Trump’s US and purchased a London home with wife Eva Mendes and their daughters Esmerelda, 11, and Amada Lee, nine.

And houses don’t come cheap in the wealthy north London location they now call home, with the average expense of a home in Hampstead coming to £1,533,972, flats going for £996,703, and semi-detached properties fetching £4,224,100 in 2024.

However, the Hollywood hunk isn’t the only A-lister to live in the exclusive London location, joining the likes of Harry Styles, Jude Law, Emma Thompson, and even Ricky Gervais, who resides in a £14.5 million bolthole.

But even though they are accustomed to seeing celebrities, the Bladerunner actor’s attractiveness has been drawing attention from the locals, especially on his most recent visit to a Persian eatery.

Posting to Instagram, Hana Restaurant described it as a ‘true honour’ for both the owner and his son to ‘welcome’ and ‘serve’ the heartthrob and his family.

‘Their warmth, kindness, and appreciation for our Persian cuisine made these evenings unforgettable,’ the restaurant wrote.

‘What made it even more special was how our guests at Hana respected their privacy, allowing the family to relax and enjoy their dining experience in comfort. 

‘Moments like these remind us why hospitality is at the heart of everything we do.’

But it isn’t only diners’ heads that have been left in a spin; the hearthrob’s visit to the local school to pick up his children has also left the mothers of Hampstead swooning.

Of his most recent visit, a Hampstead local said: ‘Yes, he’s here and so delightful chatting to everyone at the school gate – such a lovely man.

‘And everyone can’t stop talking about how good looking he is, the mums are practically drooling over him.’

Gosling’s arrival has generated much excitement in the area, with one person revealing on Instagram’s Threads that the actor had held a door open for them: ‘Today’s unexpected adventure, Ryan Gosling holding the door open for me at a cafe in West Hampstead. What a gent!… Quite unexpected, really!’

As of 2024, Gosling boasted a net worth of £55 million, while his movie star wife’s net worth was valued at about £15,000,000.

Former American actress Ms Mendes, 51, met Canadian-born Gosling on the set of the 2012 thriller Place Beyond The Pines, and they were married in 2022. Ms Mendes withdrew from acting around the time her first daughter was born.

Gosling is in London filming the forthcoming Star Wars film, Starfighter, but it is also believed he moved his family from the US to flee the ‘unstable’ political landscape. 

Known as the ‘Donald Dash’, other celebs who moved to the UK as President Trump took office include former chat show host Ellen DeGeneres, who lives in the Cotswolds with her wife Portia de Rossi, and Gosling’s Barbie co-star America Ferrera, who has reportedly moved to south-west London.

The megapop sensation Harry Styles, who is thought to possess four houses on the same upscale Hampstead street, is one of his more direct neighbours.

It comes as his neighbours hit out over worries his £30 million Hampstead mega mansion will blot out sunlight to their homes and leave them battling for a ‘right to light’.

The singer, 31, has already begun remodelling his future home in one of London’s most affluent neighbourhoods, a project that won’t be finished until late 2027.

He is creating a stunning pad with four bedrooms, a gym, a movie theatre, an art gallery, and staff quarters by uniting two opulent residences on a private estate north of the city.

Soon afterwards, it was reported he had snapped up another sprawling property in the same area – his fourth house on the same street.

However, some of the pop star’s new well-to-do neighbours worry the former One Direction singer’s expansive city retreat will be ‘overbearing’.

While others have fumed, it is ‘sad living next to a building site all the time’.

One resident told the Telegraph: ‘It’s sad living next to a building site all the time. This road didn’t used to be like this. All the houses are now constantly being bought by millionaires and redone.

‘There’s another house down at the bottom of the road, which I’m sure will be bought up and renovated like the others.

‘There’s also unfortunately less community among the neighbours than there was since people have moved on from the area.’

While they have raised concerns, no new official complaints have been made about the property. The Daily Mail contacted representatives for Harry for comment. 

And Styles isn’t the only celeb in Gosling’s neighbourhood, with British funnyman Ricky Gervais calling a £14.5 million Hampstead residence home. 

Gervais, worth an estimated £120 million, bought the mansion in March 2024, previously revealing that a significant element behind the move was his desire for a larger garden to build a tennis court. 

However, the comic, 63, has confessed the sprawling mansion is unlikely to be his ‘forever home’ as his long-term partner Jane Fallon, 63, raised concerns about the couple living there in their eighties.

‘But I didn’t die, and I wanted a tennis court, so we had to move to a bigger house with a bigger garden just so we could get a tennis court, and I just thought this is amazing, this is perfect. It’s not even finished yet, but I love it.

‘But the other day, Jane went ‘We can’t live here when we’re 80’. So that’s like a ticking clock. She said, ‘There’s all these stairs.’ So I’m going to be moving when I’m 80.’

He added: ‘But I said let’s not move, let’s just move in a load of doctors, nurses and security.

Ricky said, ‘I thought the last house was the one I was going to die in. 

‘I could have a team living inside. A driver, someone who I could play table tennis with, so that would be better.

‘Moving at 80 with all this s*** again. I don’t want to think about it. Jane did most of it anyway.’

Gosling and his family resided in Notting Hill when he was filming Project Hail Mary, so this is not his first relocation to London.

They briefly moved back to California before settling in Hampstead, an area that appears they have been eyeing up for some time, after they were reportedly seen house hunting in 2022.

Gosling and Mendes were escaping Trump’s US, yet they came to London – they obviously didn’t think that through properly!

They were clearly not fleeing Trump’s US – it’s not a war zone, well, not yet anyhow. They actually need to look around them; there is disorder, criminality and instability everywhere. Talk about jumping from the frying pan back into the fire!

They think that they’ve escaped something by leaving Trump’s America, but all they did was trade freedom and opportunity for a crumbling, overtaxed mess.

The UK is drowning in regulations, criminality and migrant disorder, and we’re supposed to be the upgrade?

The Grooming Gangs Inquiry Won’t Be Rushed

Amid outrage at the increasing chaos engulfing the government, a minister cautioned that Labour will not hurry to establish a significant new investigation into the grooming gangs crisis.

Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said finding the right chairperson for the investigation is a ‘crucial appointment to get right’, after it emerged it could take months.

In response to strong pressure, Sir Keir Starmer agreed to conduct a comprehensive nationwide investigation into group-based child sex abuse in June.

However, after four months, no one has been appointed by the Home Office to head the investigation.

Jim Gamble, a former police officer, and Annie Hudson, a former senior social worker, both withdrew from consideration for the position of chair, leaving no further contenders.

The sense of chaos has been compounded by the departure of five women from the victims liaison panel – four of whom say they would be prepared to return if safeguarding minister Jess Phillips resigns.

However, five of those still on the advisory panel have said they would only stay if Ms Phillips remained in post. There were originally about 30 survivors on the panel.

Mr Thomas-Symonds told Times Radio: ‘What we are seeking to make sure is that you have a chair who has the confidence of all the victims, and it is an absolutely crucial appointment to get right, and the experience of previous inquiries has shown the difficulty of rushing to choose someone who then doesn’t command that confidence.’

He added: ‘We are acutely conscious of how long victims have waited for justice, but the chair appointment is absolutely crucial to making sure that the inquiry commands confidence.’

He said he had confidence in Ms Phillips as a ‘powerful advocate’ in politics and before becoming an MP.

Four women on the panel – Ellie-Ann Reynolds, Fiona Goddard, Elizabeth Harper, and a woman signed only as ‘Jessica’ – resigned this week and sent a letter outlining the requirements that must be met for them to return.

Those include Ms Phillips standing down, for the inquiry to be ‘laser-focused’ on grooming gangs, and for its chair to be a former or sitting judge.

They criticised Ms Phillips for labelling some of their claims about the scope of the inquiry being widened ‘untrue’, and said they had provided evidence to the contrary.

According to the source, the government will now get back in touch with survivors to hear their worries and get their input on who should be in charge of the investigation.

Baroness Louise Casey, who was called in to assist with the investigation, will collaborate closely with the government to identify a fresh pool of potential chair candidates.

Mr Gamble said he had pulled out of the appointment process because of a ‘lack of confidence’ in him among some survivors because of his police background.

He also hit out at politicians ‘playing games’ with the inquiry and said victims had been ‘disrespected and misinformed’.

The five backing Ms Phillips said in a letter to the Prime Minister and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood that her retaining her role is one of the conditions for their continued participation.

They wrote that the minister has ‘remained impartial’ and ‘we want her to remain in position for the duration of the process for consistency’.

They said they had asked for the scope to be larger than grooming gangs because some survivors would be excluded for not fitting the ‘generalised stereotype’ of what that includes.

Sir Keir Starmer has said he ‘of course’ has faith in Ms Phillips, as other ministers also rallied around her.

‘Won’t be rushed.’ Are they having a laugh, but when Starmer became Prime Minister, it didn’t take him too long to muster his cabinet together, but they are certainly keen to let migrants and the rape of our women happen, yet everyone is turning a blind eye to it.

If it’s not a rat you can smell, it’s the overwhelming stink of corruption coming from our government.

Labour must be coerced into starting this investigation. They obviously don’t want it, or else they would have done it by now, and they appear to be doing all in their power to prevent it, proving once again that our government are a national disgrace.

They said they won’t be rushed – I’ve seen snails on Valium that move faster. It’s one massive cover-up, and Starmer knows it.

The Death Of An Essex Man Was Preventable

The death of a 20-year-old described as a “beautiful soul” was directly contributed to by the non-availability of an in-patient bed in a Mental Health Assessment Unit, a report has concluded.

Jack Peatling spent six days at home awaiting a bed before taking his own life on June 5, 2023.

A prevention of future deaths report says he had been diagnosed with anxiety and depression and had made previous attempts at taking his own life and repeated self-harm, including two previous serious attempts on May 29, 2023.

Following a formal assessment at Basildon Hospital the next day, Jack’s admission to a Mental Health Assessment Unit was documented as urgent and necessary for the proper evaluation, management and treatment of his anxiety and depression and his impulsive suicide attempts.

With the agreement of Jack and his mother, the assessment determined that, in the context of his continuous very high level risk, with high levels of impulsivity, Jack could not be safely managed in the community.

Over the next six days, the Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (EPUT) were unable to identify the needed in-patient bed anywhere in Essex.

Evidence established that the need for such beds outstripped supply and that this had been and remained a chronic problem, locally and nationally.

As it was acknowledged by the professionals involved that his risk of suicide could not be safely managed in the community, it was ruled that Jack’s demise was “avoidable” and “had an in-patient bed been made available, he would probably not have died”.

Essex coroner Sean Horstead has stated to the Department of Health and Social Security, warning that a lack of bed space could lead to further tragedies.

In response, a Government spokesman said the Department of Health and Social Care has instructed the NHS to prioritise improving the availability of mental health beds.

Jack’s case was included in a Lampard Inquiry submission in September 2024. The Lampard Inquiry is investigating deaths at NHS-run inpatient units in Essex between 2000 and 2023.

His father, Jamie, told the hearing: “Jack had so much to offer this world, and he died. We do not have the words to describe the loss of Jack on our family. Jack completed our world and built on that. He was the most beautiful soul and yet so troubled. The gap, grief and guilt that we feel as a family is indescribable.

“He was our world, and without him the sun has gone down, and our hearts are broken. We are left feeling as though we were responsible for not fighting harder for him to get the support he needed and wanted.

“He was so brave.”

Describing the problems with Jack’s care, Jamie added that the family thought a corner had been turned when they were told he needed to be admitted immediately, and Jack agreed.

“The following days, with daily visits, were unbearable,” he explained.

“Every day, Jack became more anxious, every day Jack would say that he was struggling more with increased anxiety, every day Jack would say that he would likely kill himself, and every day being told that there was no bed available.

“We were told that Jack was high priority, and despite this high priority, nothing changed. The mental health team agreed he needed to be admitted immediately, noting that his impulsive behaviour increased his risk, but there were no beds, and he was not admitted.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “Our deepest sympathies are with Jack’s family and friends. We’ve instructed the NHS to prioritise improving the availability of mental health beds, and we are investing £75 million this year to reduce inappropriate out-of-area placements so that patients can receive care closer to home.

“To reduce the number of mental health inpatients and ensure people are getting appropriate care, we are working to provide the mental health support they need in the community, including by recruiting 8,500 more mental health workers and investing £26 million in new mental health crisis centres.”

This is clearly not true, though, because back in September 2017, a 20-year-old died at Chelmsford Mental Health Unit – he hung himself.

Investigations were then expanded with officers confirming that they were looking at 25 deaths, and MPs called for a public inquiry after concerns were raised at patients’ inquests.

After Matthew Leahy was discovered hanging at the Linden Centre in Chelmsford, Essex, detectives began looking into the deaths of seven people in the care of North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

The investigation was then expanded to investigate the deaths of up to 25 people at nine additional mental health units run by the trust since 2000.

Norman Lamb and Priti Patel, who served as several of the families’ local MPs, pushed Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt to launch a public investigation.

The Care Quality Commission report found that there was room for improvement, and that there were too many areas at the Linden Centre where patients could hang themselves.

Matthew Leahy was not allowed any visitors, not even his own family, not for the first seven days, because they considered it an adjustment.

Mental health patients require the support of their family, or even a close friend if they don’t have family. They don’t need to be stressed out any more than is needed, but sadly, their idea of treatment is to medicate and leave them like vegetables. This is not the 18th century anymore, and admittedly, they know more about mental health than they used to, but it’s really all a guessing game. Unfortunately, this poor soul died a week after being admitted.

Some have called the Linden Ward ‘the sleepy ward’ because all the patients are bored, and most of the patients were left drifting.

It was said that some of the staff were good with the patients, but the majority didn’t have a lot going on in terms of treatment.

Some of the patients are even bullied out of the hospital because there just isn’t enough room, so there’s a lot of pressure to get these patients out.

This doesn’t surprise me. The psychiatrists and nurses in the UK are now so poor in attitude and skills that they are just an embarrassment. Not that the psychiatrists do much, but the nurses should at least make some kind of effort. Unfortunately, now they are just lazy or have the wrong motivation, ie they are there for the money and not to work.

I’m not saying that they are all bad; there are some good ones, but they are very few and far between.

Then there was the neglect caused by repeated failures to assess a woman going through a mental health crisis, which contributed to her death by suicide at Pitsea Station in Basildon after being struck by a train while she was suffering a decline in her mental health.

There were indeed mistakes made that contributed to her death. She had been released from a long-term mental hospital to a care home on April 11, 2023.

EPUT’s mental health services were informed by Mrs Steedman on April 15 that she wanted to end her life by ‘jumping in front of a train’. Her mental health continued to worsen in May, and this was escalated to mental health services on or about May 8, but they failed to reply.

By May 10, Mrs Steedman was in a mental health crisis, but mental health services again failed to attend and conduct an assessment of her. Mental health services failed to complete a mental health assessment on May 11. The next morning, she redirected a taxi to Pitsea railway station, where she killed herself.

On April 27, the care home alerted the mental health team and the council’s social care team that there was a chance Mrs Steedman could divert a taxi to leave carers’ supervision. However, this crisis was not escalated, and no risk assessment was conducted.

Sadly, mental health is not an exact science, but there should be more facilities and more suitable training. However, unless we go back to bedlam, locking people away forever, we can’t stop people from taking their own lives, but there does need to be more that we can do, and that we must do for these people.

Jamie Harding, aged 31, took his own life. The Essex Coroner, who investigated the death of Jamie, cautioned that until steps were taken by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (EPUT), there was an ongoing danger that more mental health patients could perish.

Jamie took his own life in June 2022, hours after being released from Basildon Hospital, where he had attended A&E, asking to be admitted for his own safety.

The inquest found the assessment carried out on him in A&E was “inadequate”, and that there was also a string of “significant and repeated failures” in the care and treatment provided to Jamie in the six months before his death.

The Coroner found that the string of failures and missed opportunities by EPUT amounted to “neglect”, and this directly contributed to Jamie’s death.

Jamie’s mother, Carolyn Claydon, said: “Losing Jamie was devastating. We miss him every day and are still traumatised by how badly he was let down by those who should have been providing him with the treatment he desperately needed, and who should have kept him safe.”

But nothing changes; the mental health system is broken and failing.

There are close to 551,000 people in England with more severe mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

I understand that people might fall through the cracks from time to time, but that is just not good enough – we need to do better, much better!

Council U-Turn On Fine For Coffee Poured In Drain

A south-west London council has changed its judgment to fine a woman £150 for pouring the remains of her coffee down a gully.

Burcu Yesilyurt, who lives in Kew, said she thought she was acting responsibly when she poured a small amount from her reusable cup down the drain – rather than risk spilling it on the bus she was about to catch to work.

She was stopped by three enforcement officers at the bus stop near Richmond station and given a fine under Section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which makes it an offence to deposit or dispose of waste in a way likely to contaminate land or water, including pouring liquids into street drains.

Richmond-Upon-Thames Council has now said it had withdrawn the fine as it was “likely” that Ms Yesilyurt’s appeal would have been successful.

The council also said the contravention was “minor” and Ms Yesilyurt had “agreed not to repeat it”.

Before the council withdrew the fine, Ms Yesilyurt told BBC News she had noticed her bus approaching, and just poured away “just a tiny little bit”.

“As soon as I turned around, I noticed three men, enforcement officers, chasing me, and they stopped me immediately.”

Ms Yesilyurt said she thought they were going to speak with her about an issue with the bus, and had no idea pouring liquid into a road gully was illegal.

She said the encounter was quite intimidating and she was left feeling “shaky” as she went into work.

“It was quite a shock,” she said.

Ms Yesilyurt added she had asked the enforcement officers if there were any signs or information warning people of the law, but received no response.

A Richmond Council spokesperson said the body-worn footage of the incident had been reviewed and the council was satisfied the enforcement officers acted appropriately.

Ms Yesilyurt said that when she asked the officers what she was supposed to have done with her remaining coffee, she was told to pour it into a nearby bin.

She said she had been trying to act responsibly and avoid littering.

“It feels quite unfair. I think the fine is extreme. It’s not proportionate,” she added.

On Wednesday, an email was sent from the council at 15:00 BST to Ms Yesilyurt, and seen by the BBC, said: “I can advise that on review the Fixed Penalty Notice has been cancelled.

“Please accept my apologies for any upset or inconvenience this has caused you,” it read.

Following the cancellation of the FPN, Ms Yesilyurt told BBC News: “I’m quite happy the council recognised the sensitivity of this situation and they’ve reconsidered.”

She said that since BBC News first published the story early on Wednesday, the reaction has been “huge” and that she was glad the issue has been highlighted.

“I’ve not met anyone who knows it’s a criminal offence,” Ms Yesilyurt added.

Ms Yesilyurt has called for the law to be made clearer with signs near bins and bus stops.

The council spokesperson said: “Fixed Penalty Notices clearly outline that there is an appeal process available to anyone who wishes to challenge them.

“It is likely that, had this case progressed through that route, the notice would have been rescinded because it is a minor contravention which the recipient agreed not to repeat.”

These enforcement officers should head down to Thames Water and see what fines they can dish out for the amount of raw sewage Thames Water allegedly dump each day.

This lady made the foolish mistake of not being a millionaire CEO or a billionaire investor. They are responsible for pollution but get off scot-free because any fines the company gets are paid by their customers.

This fine was completely absurd. People drop their paper cups by accident all the time. It spills out and ultimately makes it to the drain – do they get a fine? It’s not like she was tossing a plastic cup down the drain – these people need to give their heads a little wobble.

Dublin Erupts

Hundreds of rioters flocked to the streets to protest an alleged sexual assault committed by an asylum seeker, causing Dublin to erupt in violence for the second consecutive night.

Hundreds of protesters assembled near the entrance of the CityWest hotel, in Saggart, which accommodates asylum seekers in an area on the west side of the capital.

A 26-year-old man, who cannot be named due to rules that apply to all sexual assault cases in the Republic of Ireland, emerged in court on Tuesday charged over the alleged incident.

Between 7 pm and 8 pm on Wednesday, hundreds of protesters again faced off with around 40 uniformed gardai.

At least 23 arrests were made amid the serious disorder, and the Irish police service, An Garda Siochana, pledged a ‘robust response’ if violence continued. 

The uniformed officers were replaced with the Public Order Unit, whose members held plastic shields and extra body protection, after officers in the original cordon were pummeled with debris, stones and fireworks.

Some of those continued to throw masonry, flares, glass bottles and wooden planks at An Garda Siochana members.

There was also vandalism in the area around the Saggart Luas tram stop, which runs parallel to the road where the protesters were located.

The public order gardai moved forward with shields, pushing the crowd away from the hotel.

A police helicopter provided air support, and there were mounted garda and dog units present.

At least one garda was affected by pepper spray.

Those involved in the disorder also tried to block garda vehicles from entering the area with steel barriers.

It is the third night of demonstrations at Citywest following an apparent sexual assault on a 10-year-old girl in the area of the hotel in the early hours of Monday morning. 

The protest on Monday night went off without any major problems, but Tuesday’s violence wounded a female garda member. After being treated for a foot injury, she was later released from the hospital.

A garda vehicle was also set on fire during the turmoil earlier in the week.

Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly, who visited the scene in the aftermath of the violence, told reporters on Wednesday he is ‘determined’ that further people will be ‘brought before the courts to face justice’.

He said the disorder was not a peaceful protest and added: ‘This was violence with the intent to damage the Citywest building and intimidate those within.’

A girl in the area was allegedly sexually assaulted early on Monday morning, which sparked the demonstration outside the hotel.

Irish Premier Micheal Martin condemned the scenes of brutality, stating there could be ‘no justification’ for attacks on gardai.

Demonstrators were hurling projectiles, yelling anti-immigration chants, and flying Irish flags.

On Tuesday, there were further efforts to use scrambler motorcycles and horse-drawn sulky carts to charge the garda queue, and lasers were fired at a police aircraft in the sky.

What I would like to know is, why was a 10-year-old girl in the area of the said hotel in the early hours of Monday morning? She should have been tucked up safely in bed, where I would suspect most 10-year-olds would be at such an early hour.

However, rape is rape, especially of a child, and this is appalling, but you can mark my words, demonstrations will become more enraged until these people are expelled, along with the rest of them.

The time when we say ‘they’re not all like that’ is over because we have to now treat all illegal immigrants as a threat, because there are far too many coming to our shores.

The fuse has been ignited in this country. How long till it hits the barrel?

The trouble is, we have a government that prefers to debate transgender rights, rather than the rights of the local communities that are not being protected from this plague.

Biden Completes Round Of Radiation Therapy For Cancer

Joe Biden concluded a round of radiation treatment for his prostate cancer on Monday, his daughter disclosed in a touching tribute to the former president.

The 82-year-old was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer in May, months after he left office and was replaced by Donald Trump.

‘Ringing the bell! Thank you to the incredible doctors, nurses and staff at Penn Medicine,’ she wrote alongside a video of Biden celebrating.

‘We are so grateful! Dad has been so damn brave throughout his treatment.’

Among the other photos she posted were two of Biden standing with his family and another of him with his physician.

A spokesperson for Biden told ABC it was unclear if he would require any further treatment. 

After her string of touching posts dedicated to her father, she shifted to share a photo of demolitions underway at the White House for Trump’s new ballroom.

‘He literally destroys everything GOOD,’ she wrote. 

Biden left office in January, six months after he dropped his bid for reelection following a catastrophic debate against Trump amid concerns about his age, health and mental sharpness. 

His vice president, Kamala Harris, succeeded him but ultimately lost the electoral college and the public vote by a wide margin.

In May, Biden’s post-presidential office announced that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer and that it had spread to his bones. 

The discovery came after he reported urinary symptoms.

At the time, many questioned whether Biden had been running the country while facing cancer, continuing the questioning throughout his term about what the public knew of the president’s decline.

Leading oncologist and former Biden COVID advisor Dr Zeke Emanuel told Morning Joe in May that Biden ‘did not develop [prostate cancer] in the last 100, 200 days.’ 

‘He had it while he was president,’ Emanuel insisted. 

‘He probably had it at the start of his presidency, in 2021. Yes, I don’t think there’s any disagreement about that.’

A Gleason score is used to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancers.

The scores vary from 6 to 10, with 8, 9 and 10 prostate cancers behaving more aggressively.

Biden’s office said his score was 9, suggesting his cancer is among the most aggressive.

Emanuel questioned how such an advanced form of the disease had gone under the radar until now and spread to the former president’s bones. 

‘He’s had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading,’ said the doctor, who was named to a 16-person COVID advisory board handpicked by Biden himself.

Biden officials had outlined the severity of the diagnosis in their statement – something Emanuel pointed to as a sign that Biden’s condition has been swept under the rug.

‘I looked back at the records and there’s no evidence that when he got his health status and the medical records were released, that he had a prostate-specific antigen,’ he said. ‘Now, it is true that a lot of people recommend not doing a prostate-specific antigen after 70.

‘But President Biden’s been in public life a very long time,’ Emanuel argued, as theories continue to swirl about the timing of the diagnosis.

‘He was Vice President and had a lot of exams under 70. So it’s a little surprising that they didn’t do it. 

‘And maybe President Biden decided he didn’t want the test. Many men do decide they don’t want [it], but this is also aggressive.’

As Emanuel noted, prostate cancer is a condition that, although fatal, generally advances slowly and is frequently discovered early on through PSA blood testing, which is why he and others continue to question the timing of Biden’s diagnosis.

Urinary problems and bone pain are common warning signals in cases as advanced as Biden’s, in addition to elevated PSA levels.

As Emanuel mentioned, presidents generally undergo routine and thorough annual physicals, which would typically include PSA testing.

Doctors declared Biden ‘fit to serve’ as recently as February of last year, indicating that if he did undergo the PSA test at the time, the late-stage metastatic cancer made most of its progress within 15 months.

There is still no evidence to support the claims that Biden and his staff were aware of the illness but decided to keep it a secret.

Officials, in their statement, said the diagnosis came a week after the discovery of the small nodule on Biden’s prostate.

It also cites ‘increasing urinary symptoms’ from the former president that transpired before the discovery, which was made public days after the Democrat appeared on The View.

Last month, Biden had surgery to remove skin cancer lesions from his forehead.

He is also working on his memoir for his time in office, which he reportedly sold to Hachette Book Group for about $10 million in July.

He said at an event earlier that month that he was ‘working my tail off’ to get the memoir finished, indicating it would mainly focus on his four years in office.

In fact, I’m curious about who was in charge of the country throughout Biden’s presidency. When Biden was the vegetable in chief, most likely no one was in charge of the country.

Clearly, Biden was not competent, and much of his presidency was run behind the scenes, but statistically, he wasn’t a bad president; he could have been worse.

I do have compassion for the elderly, though, and they probably knew about his illness. Still, they brushed it under the carpet just so that Joe would be allowed to stay, and they used him as a puppet figurehead until the end, and it did end because people are expendable.

Manhunt Underway For Stolen Louvre Napoleonic Jewels

Paris has launched a massive manhunt after brazen thieves carried out a jaw-dropping daylight heist on the Louvre, stealing nine of the museum’s most priceless treasures, including a £100 million crown, in just seven minutes.

The gang of several ‘highly organised criminals’ arrived outside the world’s most visited museum at about 9.30 am local time on Sunday. At the same time, thousands of tourists enjoyed a day out at the attraction.

Masked and wielding angle grinders, the gang parked up their scooters outside the Apollo Gallery (Galerie d’Apollon), home to jewels belonging to Napoleon Bonaparte, his wife Josephine and a string of subsequent Emperors and Empresses.

They then extended a freight elevator, resembling a giant ladder, from the back of a flat-bed truck and propped it up against the wall of the gallery, which King Louis XIV opened in the 17th Century.

The targeted wing of the Louvre, on the River Seine side of the museum, was undergoing building work when the gang struck. Employees had formerly opposed understaffing at the museum in June.

After scurrying to the top of the ladder, they used an angle grinder to penetrate through the museum’s exterior window, before ascending into the Salle 705 exhibition room.

In a whirlwind seven-minute heist, they prised open two display cases and crammed away nine pieces of the 23-item Napoleon and Josephine Bonaparte collection, Le Parisien reports.

The treasures included the Eugénie Crown, embellished with thousands of diamonds and emeralds and worn by Napoleon III’s empress consort Eugénie, which was later discovered tossed below a window of the Louvre and broken into pieces.

The gang is also thought to have stolen a priceless necklace and brooch from Salle 705.

By 9.40 am, they were out of the Louvre, disappearing into the Paris morning on their scooters just as police began to arrive.

When they got there, officers discovered the huge elevator was left up against the museum’s historic stone walls.

Additional images showed what seemed to be an angle grinder on the front seat of a truck, parked outside the Louvre and surrounded by police tape. 

On a busy day in the French capital, thousands of terrified tourists were stuck inside the famous structure during a hasty evacuation before being led out onto the streets.

Forensics teams were later spotted outside the Louvre, examining the elevator and the truck on which it stood. 

The historic Eugénie Crown, presented to the empress consort in 1855, was sold at auction in 1988 for $13.5 million (£10 million) before being donated to the Louvre four years later. It is now worth tens of millions of dollars, expert Josie Goodbody told the Daily Mail.

Salle 705 also boasts Eugenie’s diamond bodice bow, although it is not yet known if this was taken.

It is home to the Regent diamond, viewed by many as the most beautiful in the world, which was strangely not stolen, according to Le Parisien. 

After being crowned Emperor and Empress of France in 1804, Napoleon and Josephine amassed one of the most remarkable jewellery collections ever known.

Many of the pieces were robbed from royalty during the French Revolution, while others were taken from around the country’s sweeping Empire, which grew rapidly under the emperor’s rule.

The Louvre, with its iconic pyramid entrance, also features Leonardo Da Vinci’s 16th-century masterpiece Mona Lisa.

Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez confirmed an investigation had been launched into ‘theft and criminal conspiracy to commit a crime’ by an organised gang.

The Banditism Repression Brigade of the Judicial Police (BRB) is leading the enquiry, along with the Central Office for Combating Trafficking in Cultural Property.

Mr Nuñez said: ‘It was necessary to close the Louvre to visitors, primarily to preserve traces and clues so that investigators could work calmly. The evacuation of the public took place without incident.’

He added: ‘We can’t prevent everything. There is great vulnerability in French museums.

‘Everything is being done to ensure we find the perpetrators as quickly as possible, and I’m hopeful.’

The busy Quai François-Mitterand, which extends along the Louvre’s buildings, was closed off to traffic until about 4 pm on Sunday.

The Élysée Palace said that President Emmanuel Macron was being ‘informed of the situation in real time’.

Those stealing historical art pieces or jewellery usually work for dealers who will be unable to sell the priceless items on the black market.

Instead, the treasures will be kept hidden and enjoyed by the master criminal who authorised the raid.

Rachida Dati, France’s Culture Minister, said: ‘I am on site alongside the museum staff and the police.’

She confirmed a criminal enquiry had been launched, and that detectives were liaising with museum staff.

According to Ms Dati, nobody was hurt during the raids, while a Louvre spokesman confirmed the museum was shut ‘for exceptional reasons’.

On June 16, staff at the Louvre staged a protest over the museum’s lack of staff and overcrowding.

Thousands of people lined up outside the museum as a result of the protest, which postponed the tourist attraction’s opening until the afternoon.

High-end art heists are not uncommon in Paris, including at the Louvre, which opened in 1793 after acting as a palace since the late 12th Century.

The most notorious was in 1911 when the Mona Lisa was taken, causing a global outcry.

An employee of the most well-known art museum in the world, Vincenzo Peruggia, spent the night hiding in a cupboard to steal the artwork.

It was recovered two years later when he attempted to sell it to an antiques dealer in Florence, Italy.

Before Sunday’s daring heist, the last theft at the Louvre took place in 1998 when Le Chemin de Sevres (The Sevres Road), by 19th-century artist Camille Corot, was plucked off the wall without anyone seeing. It remains missing to this day. 

Authorities have often promised to increase security at several galleries located across the city, yet the most recent raid still occurred.

Axe-wielding thieves targeted an exhibition of small objects at the Musée Cognacq-Jay in Paris on November 20, 2024.

Seven extremely valuable snuffboxes, including two that were loaned by the British Crown, were among their loot.

The daytime raid led to an insurance payout of more than £3 million to the Royal Collection Trust.

In 2017, three art thieves were sentenced to up to eight years in prison for stealing five masterpieces worth nearly £100 million from the Paris Museum of Modern Art.

A burglary in May 2010 saw works by Pablo Picasso and Henri Matisse vanish from the same gallery. 

This is extremely irresponsible of the Louvre, but then Paris and France have been in decline for some time now, and now these priceless and irreplaceable pieces may never be recovered.

So, not one person in the entire crowd, or security saw anything unusual about people arriving in face masks, a truck with an elevated ladder, nor somebody cutting open the roof of the Napoleon wing, plus the alarms were not activated. The Louvre is highly protected; you can’t even get past the front door without a full inspection and a metal detector. Inside job perhaps?

No doubt they will be out of the country, heading to the Middle East, because they do love our precious gems.

Only in France will they riot over the price of a baguette, but then leave £100 million of gems guarded by a bloke on his lunch break. Mind you, have you seen the price of those baguettes? Sacré Bleu.

It seems like the entire thing was extremely well planned – better get Inspector Jacques Clouseau on the case, and this is why you should never leave your louvre windows open.

If the wing was under construction like they said, whoever was working on it would have been accompanied there by security, and then they would have been given a pass, so you have to admire them, whoever they were – nobody got injured in the process of this heist. No doubt, soon they will be making this into a movie.

This should never have happened. The Louvre should have had far better security to deal with any possible theft like this. It’s not like they don’t make enough money every year to afford the best. Security may as well have left the door open for them.

If I were to hazard a guess, this heist was something that was extremely well planned, and whoever did it was hired by someone who wanted these particular objects with very deep pockets.

Piers Morgan For Prime Minister – Or Maybe Not

It started as a joke, but after a fiery ministerial grilling on Good Morning Britain, someone on Twitter suggested that Piers Morgan would make a good Prime Minister – the jury might still be out on that one, but the tagline ‘PM for PM’ has a good ring to it; however, that doesn’t mean he would make a good Prime Minister.

The following morning, the entire front page of the Daily Star newspaper was embellished with that slogan, prompting bookies to slash odds on Piers Morgan becoming the leader of this country from 500-1 to 20-1.

What started as a bit of fun has now become a serious bandwagon, with more and more people clamouring for Piers to take over the reins at No 10 and restore some sort of order to our embattled country.

He said that the campaign got him thinking that if he ever did throw his hat into the political arena and made it to the highest office in the land, what would he do?

Well, he might not be the worst Prime Minister. Surely he’s got to do a bit better than all the other PMs. So, what would he do differently?

As I read through his manifesto, I thought to myself, ‘He’s not bad at all.’ And then as I got further down, it just became all so absurd.

He is right, though, Britain is in turmoil, and it does need mending, but not with a needle and cotton – great big rolls of gaffer tape.

Piers, you are never going to repair what others have done to the country. You can blame COVID all you like, but this country was broken way before the COVID outbreak, and now it has to be repaired, which is never going to happen overnight; it will take years and years of tender loving care – it’s like recovery after having surgery, and Rome wasn’t built in a day.

What we actually need to do is make sure that things don’t get any worse.

It would be fine getting rid of some of the cabinet, but you have to make sure they are better than the ones before. I love the idea of Marcus Rashford being Education Secretary. He would be a person who would be doing it because he wants to and not because of the money, and on that note, make all your cabinet take a pay cut, including yourself, because then that shows the public goodwill on your part, and when I say a cut, I mean half.

I also like the idea of Dr Hilary Jones becoming Health Secretary. I’m not so sure he would want the responsibility that comes with the job, but at least he would have more smarts when overseeing the nation’s health care.

Also, everything that your cabinet does should go through the Prime Minister first and then King Charles. I know they are just the monarchy, but they should be given more responsibility. The House of Lords needs to be abolished because all they do is sit around napping most of the day, so there is actually no need for them to be there.

Cabinet to voice their opinions is fine as long as the final solution is down to the Prime Minister, then we only have one person to blame… You!

Not looking such a cushy position now, is it?

Cabinet ministers should not be permitted to speak on TV. It’s not a media circus; otherwise, we would have acrobats and trapeze artists instead of ministers. I guess we could always put them in a frilly frock and a red nose.

Twitter, Facebook and any social media platform should be closed down permanently, then there would not be any trolling of any kind.

Anybody who does not work in the Royal Family should be stripped of their royal titles. If you’re not in it, you don’t win it.

And then there is false advertising: ‘ Red Bull ‘gives you wings.’ I’ve never seen anybody with a Red Bull in their hand flying about – false advertising.

Sport is sport, whether you are transgender or not. If they want to compete, then they should be allowed to compete. The only reason people keep going on about it is because people are ignorant of what they don’t know – including you, Piers Morgan. You say that you’re not, but the fact that you even had to mention it makes you so.

Tackle the shocking obesity crisis – are you having a laugh? Give children a proper school meal – you know, meat and two veg every day, and they might not be so ravenous when they leave school and rush to the corner shop to stuff their faces. Oh, and bring back proper dinner ladies who cared about the children they were feeding.

And this is where you got truly ridiculous – ditch the Video Assistant Referee from football. How on earth is that going to benefit our country?

Climate change is inevitable; it’s going to happen whether we like it or not. Our sun will burn out in 5 billion or so years, by then nobody is going to give a flying …

Making Greta Thunberg the Environmental Secretary isn’t going to make one bit of difference unless she’s going to get on her flying saucer and fly to the sun to make it further away.

Whatever pandemic we have next, people will still die, but life will go on, well, for about 5 billion years or so.

Piers said that in his first budget, he would double the pay of every single person presently working in the NHS, but he fails to say where he will get the money from.

This was the most ridiculous one. He will ban joggers from all high streets. I’m not sure how this will help Britain. What is it? You don’t like them – every other person wears them. What Piers should have said is ban every head covering so we can see a person’s face so that Artificial Intelligence can see them and if they are getting up to any skulduggery.

I could go on and on, but it became so ludicrous that I wouldn’t want to bore the populace with it all.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started