The plan To Permit 16-Year-Olds To Legally Alter Their Gender Is Causing Concerns

Campaigners have criticised Nicola Sturgeon’s proposal to enable people to change their gender at the age of 16, claiming the move could open the floodgates to teens requesting irreversible gender reassignment surgery.

The Scottish Government has said it plans to bring forward the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill within the next year.

The draft law would introduce a new and easier system for obtaining legal gender recognition in Scotland and could decrease the age at which someone can apply for a gender recognition certificate from 18 to 16.

Statistics obtained by the For Women Scotland campaign group showed there were at least 51 cases over a six-year period where trans males under the age of 18 had been approved for double mastectomies.

Those people were referred to NHS hospitals in England for assessment on specialist chest reconstruction.

The campaign group has expressed concerns that lowering the age limit for certificates to 16 could result in more young people requesting surgery which they could later repent.

Trina Budge, director of For Women Scotland, told a newspaper outlet that England and other nations were sensibly rolling back on invasive and non-reversible treatments for young trans people, and she said it was shocking to see Scotland going in the reverse direction.

She said that no physically healthy child should ever be locked into a pathway of puberty-blocking medications and wrong sex hormones, leading to the elimination of breasts at the age of 16.

She also said that reducing the age at which gender could be changed to 16 would unavoidably unlock the floodgates for countless more teenagers to request elective surgeries to match their new legal status.

A Scottish Government spokesperson said that under the oversight of their clinical team a tiny number of young adults have been referred for chest reconstruction surgery at 17. However, he said, further assessments needed before surgery meant that, in practice, it’s doubtful the procedure would take place before a person is 18.

The SNP committed to bringing forth its Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill in its new Programme for Government.

The document says that while the COVID 19 pandemic delayed their attempt to establish a more straightforward method for obtaining legal gender recognition, trans people shouldn’t have to go through a humiliating, traumatic and intrusive process to be legally recognised in their gender.

It said that within the next year, they will bring forward the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, removing the current medical requirements and decreasing the time that applicants for gender recognition need to have lived in their acquired gender from two years to three months.

This, of course, all makes no sense at all, considering you have to be 18 years old to buy tobacco and booze, and how will these people be getting surgery when all the waiting lists are backed up?

The NHS is in crisis and she does this. Not that these people shouldn’t have gender reconstruction, but waiting lists are pretty long at the moment, and there are numerous cases where young people like they do, have changed their minds.

A trans activist woman who transitioned in 2018 has sparked controversy by declaring that numerous people who have had gender reassignment regret the decision and want to return to their original sex.

The amount of young people seeking gender transition is at the highest it’s ever been, but little is reported about how many of them regret the decision later, finding they’re miserable with their new gender.

Many teenagers can’t even keep their bedroom tidy, let alone make a life-altering decision, but if someone wants a transition, then who are we to stand in their way?

Pembrokeshire Hotel Slammed For Charging £200 Membership Fee

An iconic Welsh hotel has defended its decision to introduce a £200 membership fee after becoming overwhelmed by social media users looking to take sunset photographs from its clifftop bar.

The Druidstone Hotel, perched on a remote Pembrokeshire clifftop, is a favourite for visiting holidaymakers in search of sundown drinks and selfies on the terrace.

With its west-facing terrace and 20 acres of grounds, the venue attracts beachgoers from the sands below to watch the sunset over the rolling waves of St Brides Bay.

But for non-residents and outsiders, the Druidestone’s majestic views and cellar bar real ales now come with an extra price tag, with the membership of the ‘Dru Crew’ starting at £200 and increasing to an eye-watering £400 a year.

According to the hotel’s website, the controversial move has been designed to strike the right balance between loyal locals versus the passing trade, temporary campsite and holiday cottage guests.

And while critics have branded the ploy backward and elitest, owner Angus Bell hit back, stating that when people are whinging about it on Facebook and TripAdvisor, let’s be honest, they’re exactly the sort of people he didn’t want to come.

One Tripadvisor reviewer that has been a patron for meals and drinks for over 40 years, lamented that the current hospitality model was one that some in Pembrokeshire would recognise.

Another called the move as completely elitist and backward and that it was frustrating to have such a beautiful place turned into an elitist members-only club where you can only drink if you were staying there or spending £200 plus a year.

And a third complained that sadly now it was a £200 a year members meetinghouse thus preventing people from calling in ad hoc for drinks and food.

However, Angus Bell remains defiant, and he said that his one enjoyment in life was now time, and said that he’s got time for his staff, time for his guests and that he’s not stressed. He said that was his home, and he couldn’t ever imagine living anywhere else.

He said that he’s made his life better, even though some might be a bit upset that they can’t just pop over for a cup of tea.

The Druidstone is frequently praised in guidebooks and by travel writers as one of the most treasured hotels in Wales.

It appears to have been done solely out of greed, and he probably accepts that barely anyone will pay the membership, but he seems more than happy with that and doesn’t want every man and his dog in his hotel, and he doesn’t want his home to become a pub. It is his hotel and he makes the rules, and I guess if people don’t like it, they don’t have to stay at the hotel.

He also needs to keep all his locals and guests coming there after all the tourists have gone home, although I can’t say that I would spend £200 a year to be allowed in. Still, hospitality has had a rough time, so perhaps he should be given some slack.

It’s the 80/20 rule. Eighty per cent of your business is sustained by 20 per cent of your regulars, and if you lose the regulars, then you won’t be in business when the tourists go home.

It’s either going to backfire and lose all customers or it’s going to make more money and be a big success, but why would you cut off the hand that feeds you?

If he just wants residents only, then perhaps he should issue a membership card to the locals who request one, but then if he’s unhappy with visiting holidaymakers, maybe he’s in the wrong business.

Laura Loomer Has A Brutal Case Of COVID-19

Right-wing activist Laura Loomer is calling for prayers as she claims her COVID 19 symptoms are brutal after attesting the virus was no worse than food poisoning.

The unvaccinated activist, 28, insisted she had body pains and nausea.

She wrote on Gettr, a social media platform founded by former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller that she wanted people to pray for her, and that she couldn’t even begin to describe how brutally her body hurt and nausea that came with the COVID were, and that she was in so much pain, and that was the worst part about it.

Self-proclaimed pro-democracy media company Meidas Touch reposted it on Twitter, where Laura Loomer was banned permanently for making hate remarks and breaking the company’s rules, writing: ‘Yikes. Please take this virus seriously, get vaccinated and wear a mask…’

She told supporters on the conservative social media platform that she has a temperature, chills, a runny nose, sore throat, nausea, severe body pains, and feels like she got hit by a bus.

She later wrote on her Telegram page that she’s taken Regeneron, Azithromycin, and Hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ, to manage her symptoms.

She also said she hopes to be ivermectin shortly too, which is used to manage roundworms in humans, although several studies have found these medications are useless treatments for COVID 19 and patients are warned against using them.

Hydroxychloroquine, which can cause heart problems, is generally paired with Azithromycin, which the US National Library of Medicine recommends to only use for community-acquired pneumonia.

According to a newspaper outlet, Regeneron, one of the innovative drugs former President Donald Trump used when he got the virus, is only useful when the virus is caught early and prescribed by a doctor.

Previously, Loomer had said she wanted to catch the virus just to prove it was no more serious than a case of food poisoning from bad fajitas.

She insisted that she was hospitalised for food poisoning because she was so dehydrated and could hardly breathe.

She justified it as worse than the virus that has killed more than 670,000 people because people get COVID and don’t even know they have COVID.

According to UC Health, an estimated 20 to 30 per cent of COVID 19 cases are asymptomatic.

Loomer also declared the virus to be the greatest deception of our lives besides the 2020 election and warned others that you couldn’t escape the vaccine propaganda.

Of course, our thoughts and prayers are with her, I guess, although a tad hypocritical now, and COVID like food poisoning, can be extremely severe, apparently ignorance can also be extremely severe as well.

I guess we should always get our medical information from those that are trained in medicine, but there are also quite a few people trained in medicine including Nobel prize-winning physicians who don’t think that the vaccine is safe, and perhaps in a few years, people will realise they should have listened to those doctors.

The problem is, everything appears to be an endless competition surrounding COVID. We know that COVID can cause significant illness and mortality, but there have also been losses from having the COVID jab, and then there are some people that have been walking about without any manifestations, not even realising that they have COVID until they swab with a testing kit, but it seems to be a daily competition.

It really doesn’t matter where this virus came from, not now anyhow because it seems it’s here to stay for a pretty long time, and instead of having this endless competition, the main thing that we should be doing is making sure that we’re protected and that our fellow man is protected as well.

An Australian Business Owner Bans Vaccinated Patrons From His Store

The proprietor of Gigantic Signs has forbidden customers who have received the vaccine from entering his store.

Peter King put a sign in the storefront window of Gigantic Signs on King William Street in Kent Town, Adelaide. The warning letter was written in bright red letters telling vaccinated residents they were no longer welcome. The sign read that they shouldn’t enter if they’d been COVID 19 vaxxed.

But the warning has sparked outrage in the community with residents labelling it unfair, but a legal expert has warned that the storekeeper hasn’t violated the law.

University of South Australia emeritus professor Rick Sarre said no discrimination laws around vaccination status had been made, and he told 7 News that they can do whatever they like in terms of discrimination law because there are no grounds of discrimination based on vaccination status.

Peter King, the director of Gigantic Signs, said Australia’s vaccination drive was equal to murder, and he told news.com.au that he was simply making a statement.

He said that they have there in Adelaide a company that said they didn’t want to have any people going to their winery that wasn’t vaxxed and that he believed it was grossly unfair and intimidating.

Outraged customers have vowed to boycott the business with many expressing their frustration on social media, and one person wrote that they would say that Gigantic Signs had made a gigantic mistake by displaying a not gigantic sign on the front door and that they shouldn’t carry on and ask for help when the business takes a gigantic nose dive.

Another person added that they promised not to enter their establishment, ever, and that they wouldn’t darken their door with their patronage and that it boiled down to choices and consequences.

The storekeeper refused to comment further when contacted by a newspaper outlet.

The sign adds to a growing debate over the power of businesses to refuse service to unvaccinated customers.

NSW and Victoria plan to roll out a vaccine passport allowing the double jabbed to return to hospitality venues and retail stores when the states start to open at 70 per cent vaccination.

Unvaccinated residents have been told they will be unable to experience the same freedoms as their vaccinated counterparts.

Of course, this isn’t a sound business move banning the majority, but each to their own, and it appears that now you can discriminate against whoever you like, and with the uptake expected of 80 per cent of vaccinations, I would think that this business just shot itself in the foot. It’s a little like Homer Simpson and his shop selling items only for left-handed people, but when you only cater for 20 per cent of the market, you end up having no business.

Turning away people whether they are jabbed or not is a bad thing, and it’s medical apartheid and absolute discrimination, and whatever side of the fence you sit on, can’t you see this drivel for what it is?

No one should know your health status, least of all a business because you’re entering to spend your hard-earned cash and helping the economy to flourish.

It’s just as absurd as banning unvaccinated people and everyone should have free will, and it really wouldn’t make any sense to ban vaccinated customers, people could simply lie anyhow, and it seems that this is simply an advertising stunt because you can’t prove you haven’t been vaccinated, only that you have.

A Priceless Moment When Joe Biden Forgot His Name On Live TV

Scott Morrison laughed off the embarrassing moment when President Joe Biden forgot his name by saying that it happens to the best of us.

The slip up occurred during a virtual press conference on Thursday morning to announce a new alliance between Australia, the US and the United Kingdom.

When it was his turn to talk, 78-year-old Joe Biden thanked UK leader Boris Johnson, who had spoken before him, but then forgot the Australian Prime Minister’s name.

‘Thank you, Boris, and I want to thank…’ he began, before an uncomfortable pause in which he turned and pointed to the screen showing Scott Morrison’s smiling face.

‘That fella Down Under… Thank you very much, pal… Appreciate it, Mr Prime Minister,’ he continued.

In an interview on Melbourne’s Fox radio on Friday, Scott Morrison laughed as he was played a clip of the moment.

‘It happens to the best of us,’ he quipped.

Asked if Joe Biden had text him to say sorry, Scott Morrison said that there was need for that and that it was all good, and he added that he did refer to him privately when they speak as ‘pal’ and that it was an expression that he used a fair bit.

Media pundits were keen to point out the awkward blunder.

Today show host Karl Stefanovic said after the press conference was aired live that it was a very political announcement.

‘But that fella from Down Under, I mean totally awks.’

Nine political editor Chris Uhlmann responded that it was almost as awkward as the acronym AUKUS, Australia, United Kingdom and the United States.

Americans, Australians, and Britons immediately flocked to social media to laugh at the bizarre moment.

One American woman tweeted that it was just a public speaking tip, but that if you were going to mention someone by name, then write it down.

British journalist Graeme Demianyk wrote that Joe Biden calls the Australian prime minister that fella down under and throws in a thank you very much, pal.

The deal will mean Australia will stroll away from its controversial deal to spend up to $90 billion buying French diesel-powered submarines.

This is the first time Australia has embraced nuclear power after decades of debate, and the first time the US and the United Kingdom have shared their nuclear submarines technology with another country.

I’m surprised that Joe Biden can even remember his own name if he can’t remember the name of others, but forgetting things is something that all politicians seem to have in common, and I’m surprised that Joe can remember his wife’s name, let alone his own – this one would be a good one on Spitting Image.

And these senior moments are getting more frequent, but it’s not like Donald Trump ever made a gaffe here and there, although Donald Trump did pass his cognitive tests, it appears that Joe Biden has refused, I wonder why?

Perhaps there should be an age cap when electing someone as important as the president of a country like the US because we just can’t defy the laws of nature, and the last thing that the United Kingdom needs is an alliance with a country with an unstable President – and they thought Donald Trump was a liability.

However, dementia is cruel and shouldn’t be mocked in any way, but it is gravely disturbing that the ruler of the free world and arguably the most influential man on earth possesses the nuclear codes when he’s losing his memory so spectacularly.

And he’s very much open to manipulation, and indeed it’s pretty evident that his role is a highly managed one with his aides shielding him from impromptu press conferences and no doubt writing all of his speeches, and we hope that all of these people have good intentions, but I wouldn’t be so sure of that.

Police Strip-Searched And Arrested A 55-Year-Old IT Consultant

An IT consultant is suing police for being wrongfully arrested in Waitrose and insists she was strip-searched by police for refusing to wear a facemask while shopping despite being exempt.

Juliet Johnson says she was questioned by store security and a manager at the store in Chichester, West Sussex, about not wearing a mask, which was mandatory at the time, and although she said she’d proved she didn’t need to wear a mask as she suffers from an autoimmune disease that affects her breathing, police were summoned to the store.

Juliet Johnson says that while browsing for groceries she was then confronted by two officers and subsequently arrested, taken to a nearby police station, questioned and strip-searched.

After being detained for two hours, the 55-year-old was discharged the same day with no charges.

The consultant maintains that during the whole episode she was neither abusive nor offensive to anyone in the store but has since been banned from Waitrose and John Lewis, a prohibition which even includes buying online.

She’s now suing the police for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, assault and disability discrimination.

Sussex Police said a civil claim has been made which the force strongly disputed, with a spokesperson adding liability has been denied.

On February 25 this year, Juliet Johnson said she was peacefully and quietly pushing her trolley picking items from the store in Chichester, West Sussex.

She’d proved her exemption to the security guard of the store on a previous visit by showing three forms of evidence including her NHS exemption card, but she said she was then confronted by the supermarket’s manager who’d been informed by the guard and was asked why she wasn’t wearing a face mask.

At the time, wearing a face-covering in shops and supermarkets was a legal requirement, mandated by the government, unless exempt for health reasons.

After explaining she didn’t need to wear a mask, Juliet Johnson said the manager left her to carry on shopping but as she was picking up a tin of baked beans she was confronted by police officers.

Juliet Johnson said that she’d already explained she didn’t need to wear a facemask, and she said that like countless others, she suffers from a chronic health condition, invisible on the outside but at times debilitating.

The manager called the police without her knowledge. And that she told the police officer of her human rights and that she’d already proved she was exempt.

People with breathing difficulties should never have to mask their face at all because it reduces their breathing, and not only that there are major hygiene concerns with mask-wearing, and this woman was exempt from wearing one and had shown evidence that she was.

However, a lot of shops and stores got extremely enthusiastic with those who were exempt from wearing a face mask, and videos of such events were all-around social media at the time.

And it looks like these stazi police went overboard with these COVID restrictions. She had an exemption, she wasn’t charged with anything, and Waitrose will definitely be off my shopping list now.

But it looks like immigrants on dinghies come over, help themselves to a hotel, block the M25, and our government are bending over backwards to accommodate them, but if you’re not wearing a mask, the police will bundle you into the back of a vehicle and take off your trousers.

And why was this woman strip-searched? Being strip-searched had no connection to a virus that would cause someone to be strip-searched. It’s not like she was hiding stolen goods in her mask, she wasn’t wearing one, and these police officers involved need a major disciplinary and some training on knowing the difference between bullying and professionalism.

Mother Studied Black Magic After Quitting Her Architect Career

An architect who left her job to take up black magic was discovered dead with her one-year-old daughter after a ritual killing.

The naked body of Elizaveta Tsarevskaya, 32, was discovered with her daughter and a slaughtered cat in the Russian city of Rostov-on-Don.

Next to the bodies were images of her the architect’s ex-lover smeared with blood, with the eyes stabbed at.

A police source said that after opening the apartment, even trained law enforcement officers were horrified. Bloodied things, objects of magic rituals were spread throughout, and that the woman’s body was on her dead daughter – for some reason, the mother was naked, and a further victim was discovered – a cat.

All had stab wounds, thought to have been perpetrated by the woman, called a witch by local media.

Her husband Artur Rusin, 26, said she’d graduated with honours as a top architecture student, and was also a gifted clothes designer, but that she’d become fixated with the occult and tried to communicate with the dead.

And that when he went away to work, she became pregnant by a lover called Anton, who was also into black magic, and according to reports she gave birth to her lover’s child who her husband initially raised as his own.

Law enforcement said that her flat doors were secured from the inside and it’s believed she killed her daughter and the cat before taking her own life in a ritual killing. Her lover has not been found.

This was one severely broken mental patient, and her child paid the price, as did the poor cat.

Facebook Forbids Any Mention Of Cockshoot Dyke On Norfolk Waterway

Facebook has forbidden any mention of a Norfolk waterway because its name is considered too rude.

The stretch of water is called Cockshoot Dyke and is a popular visitor spot on the Norfolk Broads.

A dyke is a stretch of water that usually runs along or parallel to a body of water such as a river.

The administrator of the Love the Norfolk Broads Facebook page, Steve Burgess, 61, said the issue first came up when a member wrote on the group that she was moored along a stretch of the dyke.

The company claimed the reason it was removed was because of violence and sexual content.

Steve Burgess told a newspaper outlet that they put two and two together and got 58 and that you’ve got to laugh about it, and the irony was that we see so much that’s offensive, violent or sexual but nothing’s done about it, and even a businessman who runs a shop in the area has been banned from posting pictures for days in the past.

Steve Burgess added that it was a bit Big Brotherish but it did make sense.

Other places which have been removed from Facebook because of their names include Plymouth Hoe and Devil’s Dyke in Sussex.

And does anyone actually care what some woke person at Facebook finds offensive? But of course, all they really want to do is stifle free speech and the uncontrolled exchange of opinions, and I’m guessing that no doubt Cockermouth in Cumbria will also be deemed offensive by Facebook.

They might even ban Upperthong in Yorkshire, Oldham in Lancashire or even Ramsbottom.

Facebook seriously needs to sort itself out and chill out. Oh look out, it’s Pratt’s Bottom, but I was actually talking about Facebook, but then that’s typical Facebook fighting imaginary dragons while ignoring real problems.

I hope that there at Facebook they have enough intellect to realise that the name Cockburn is a real name or an extremely wonderful port – that’s not a sailing port, but something that you drink, and a real medical issue if when you think of these words, only filth satisfies your grey matter.

There are a lot of people that frequent Facebook, and enjoy going on there, but it has become a cesspool, if nothing but a petri-dish run by self-anointed egomaniacs hell-bent on shaping society to their notions of right and wrong, never mind the opinions of a preponderance of ordinary people.

This is a stupid age that we’re living in, the age of woke people and a world that has gone mad, but then I expect that the Germans might have said something similar about Hitler and his posse, not realising how truly evil he was.

Perhaps we should just ban the word Facebook because it could be said that it’s insulting books, although books aren’t human matter, the wokes of this world would still think it was a splendid idea.

If people don’t want to see this sort of thing on Facebook and think that it’s demeaning, then don’t go on Facebook, don’t even sign up for it, or if parents believe that it’s not proper, that’s what parental controls are for.

And does this mean that we can’t post words like Cockpit, Cockroach, Cocktail, Cockatoo and Cockapoo, the list is infinite, and God forbid you should even put a photograph of your Cocker Spaniel on there.

Currently, Only 1.6 Million Elderly People Are Eligible For COVID Boosters

Official data suggests that as No 10 gets set to kick off the top up drive, only 1.6 million Britons are currently eligible for COVID booster vaccines.

Health chiefs yesterday unveiled proposals to offer a third shot to 32 million over 50s, frontline NHS workers and over 16s thought to be very vulnerable.

According to officials who signed off on the move due to waning immunity, people will only be called for a booster six months after getting their second jab because that seems to be the sweet spot, but the Department of Health numbers show only 1.6 million people in the United Kingdom, chiefly care home residents and frontline health workers, were completely vaccinated by March 15.

The United Kingdom didn’t breach the 30 million mark until June, meaning the campaign won’t be open to millions of vulnerable adults until much more like Christmas.

Experts told a newspaper outlet the decision to delay boosters by six months shouldn’t be cause for concern because the gap means people are only given a top-up dose as their immunity begins to fade.

But they warned it could be a problem for a small number of older and vulnerable people whose immunity falls faster than anticipated.

Booster shots of the Pfizer jab, or a half dose of Moderna, will be given to those eligible from next week, regardless of which jab they originally got.

Those who can’t get either of those two mRNA jabs, such as due to an allergy, will be given a dose of AstraZeneca’s vaccine.

The jabs will be dished out through vaccination centres, primary care networks and pharmacies and can be given at the same time as yearly flu jabs.

Department of Health bosses said the booster campaign will ensure the protection vaccines provide for those most at risk of severe illness from COVID, which will be maintained over the winter months.

It’s the first stage of the Government’s winter plan to circumvent another lockdown.

If hospitalisations grow swiftly, ministers have warned they could be forced to reintroduce face masks and work from home guidance.

The Prime Minister was told it’s better to act early, rather than dithering and having to go harder to fight off any surge later this year.

Government statistics show the UK hit 10 million second vaccinations on April 18, meaning the third dose rollout will not be open to a third of those eligible until mid-October.

We don’t really know what the long term effects are of having the vaccine, but I suspect that we’ll soon find out.

I probably won’t be getting my third jab anytime soon, thank you very much, unless the booster guarantees to make me super immune, improves my IQ and guarantees me living until 100 – oh, Superman, where are you?

And maybe it might make some men better in the sack, while women earn a better wage – if they’re not getting all that, then we’ve been conned.

Intelligent folk are the ones who trusted their gut instinct – some refused the jab, others chose to try it, it’s simply a matter of preference. But those that did refuse to take the jab have been relentlessly attacked by people online, in the workplace and even by family and friends, but some won’t bend because they want to obtain the facts about an experimental drug before they take it, and some won’t be coerced into having the booster with the mix and match.

Prince Harry And Meghan Markle Have Been Listed Amongst The World’s Hundred Most Influential People

It was revealed that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are the stars of Time Magazine’s 2021 list of the hundred most important people on the planet.

The glossy photos are accompanied by a gushing profile, branded sycophantic by critics, written by their friends and chef José Andrés, whose charity World Central Kitchen is loved by the Sussexes and supported by their Archewell foundation.

He wrote: ‘In a world where everyone has an opinion about people they don’t know, the duke and duchess have compassion for the people they don’t know. They don’t just opine. They run toward the struggle.’

On the cover, Harry is dressed in all black and Meghan is all white on the terrace at their $14.65 million mansion and estate in Montecito, California, as José Andrés said, the couple are blessed through birth and talent, and burned by fame, adding it would be much safer to enjoy their good fortune and stay silent, but that was not what Harry and Meghan do, or who they are.

In another picture, they’re in matching grey office style clothes next to a window in photographs taken by Serbian Pari Dukovic, but one critic, a fellow photographer, tweeted that it was a terrible retouching job.

José Andrés describes the notorious event when Harry was serving in Afghanistan for the British Army when he was forced to run to his Apache helicopter when his airbase came under attack.

He wrote that the same sense of urgency drives Meghan, now the Duchess of Sussex, who has long been an active humanitarian and a strong advocate for women and girls around the globe, and springing into action isn’t the easy option for the young duke and duchess who have been blessed through birth and talent, and burned by popularity.

He said that they turn compassion into boots on the ground through their Archewell Foundation and that they give voice to the voiceless through media production, and that hand in hand with nonprofit partners, they take risks to support communities in poverty, offering mental health support to Black women and girls in the US, and feeding those affected by natural disasters in India and the Caribbean.

And he said that in a world where everyone has an opinion about people they don’t know, the duke and duchess have compassion for the people that they don’t know.

This, of course, should help keep the money rolling in for a little while, considering they just wanted a quiet life.

They look like a pair of waxworks on the front cover – perhaps Meghan will airbrush Harry out later! And Harry looks like a needy child grabbing his mummy from behind.

And what do they do for this accolade? A few nappies here, a soup kitchen there. A zoom call, and the mention of a noble cause here, and I have no problem with them at all if they were true philanthropists, but the Americans appear to love them, and I’m sure I don’t know why.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were also snubbed by the Obamas because the former president and first lady will always go towards William because of the brother’s rift.

Harry and Meghan were not guests at Barack Obama’s glitzy 60th birthday party and it’s been suggested their association with the presidential couple has cooled off, and royal insiders have suggested the Obamas are being wary about appearing familiar with Harry and Meghan due to concerns about public image and out of respect for the Queen.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started