Britain Is Set To End Unnecessary Web Cookie Requests

The Culture Secretary will announce proposals to sweep away swathes of the EU’s flagship data laws which could spell the end of pointless web cookie warnings and red tape.

In what is the first post Brexit shake-up of the UK’s digital economy, Oliver Dowden is set to outline how Briton’s data can be used more flexibly.

Speaking to a newspaper outlet, Oliver Dowden said the Government plans to peel away from key parts of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, which came into force in 2018.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which dictates how people’s personal information is collected, has been criticised for being too bureaucratic and overly rigid.

Oliver Dowden suggested the new reforms would also cut down on cookie banners, which are used by websites to secure users permission for collecting their data.

At present under the GDPR rules, sites have to give users a genuine choice over whether to say yes or no to cookies that process and share their data.

Ministers are also said to be preparing to shake up Britain’s data watchdog.

The Government is set to select John Edwards, who’s currently New Zealand’s privacy commissioner, to head up the regulator.

Oliver Dowden described the reforms as a data dividend of Brexit and said the new British framework would be more proportionate, and he added that it would help to cut the costs for businesses and facilitate great innovation which would also encourage growth, opportunities and jobs.

However, the EU continues to trumpet GDPR as having improved data privacy measures across the world, meaning the United Kingdom could trigger fresh tensions with the bloc by deviating from the rules.

The policies will also likely be scrutinised by privacy campaigners who fear further online profiling of individuals and greater massing of personal data by large companies.

Oliver Dowden said the reforms would bring an end to unnecessary bureaucracy and box-ticking but would still protect people’s privacy.

What’s irritating is that some sites make it virtually impossible to decline cookies, while other sites give simple options – accept, chose or decline all.

Most sites use cookies, but it’s not about that, it’s what the cookies are being used for, like the information that they collect about you, and the profile that you build up – a digital footprint of your life.

And of course, with that digital footprint, they have the ability to track you, your data farmed out and sold. So, what that implies is that all this data that your cookies are gathering are collecting all of your data, and ultimately it will be without your say so.

Eventually, they will eliminate all barriers, it will be a total take over by the oppressive elite, who couldn’t care less about you, and I bet Governments have much more in store for us, and it seems that we have no privacy online, whatever box we tick.

The problem is the law doesn’t go far enough. The law should be that there should be no cookies unless a person explicitly gives consent, and the default should be a ‘no’ button.

And if the information is to be used, that data should stay where it’s put and used for the purpose that person provides it for.

Welcome to the 21st century where our privacy rights have also been eroded.

These cookies track your digital behaviour (digital footprint) and numerous companies use them for many reasons because the cookies build a profile of the user and this information is sold on or used for other reasons, but it’s making a mockery of your rights.

NHS England Draws Up Plans To Commence Vaccinating Children

It emerged that the NHS has drawn up proposals to offer COVID vaccines to children as young as 12 when schools return.

NHS England bosses yesterday told trusts to be ready to expand the rollout to 12-15-year-olds in just two weeks, and health officials said that children won’t need parental consent to get the vaccine.

Britain’s medical regulator, the MHRA, has already said the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are safe and effective for the age group, but the Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunisations (JCVI), which advises No 10 on jabs, and is separate from the MHRA, is yet to green light to the plans.

It claims the small risk of side effects may still outweigh the benefit due to the fact young children are highly unlikely to be seriously ill with COVID.

Leaked emails reveal NHS trusts in England have until 4 pm on Friday to have plans in place for the rollout in children.

Britain’s daily COVID cases, hospitalisations and deaths have been gradually escalating for weeks, which has raised fears over a fresh wave when schools return.

All 16 and 17-year-olds are already being invited for the Pfizer vaccine and don’t need consent from a parent or guardian to get one, but only under 16s who live with vulnerable people or who have immune weaknesses themselves are being invited at present.

The Department of Health, which has asked the JCVI for a recommendation on jabbing 12 to 15-year-olds, said a decision is yet to be taken.

Both Moderna and Pfizer jabs have been linked to myocarditis, a rare heart problem thought to affect about one in 20,000 young people.

The JCVI has maintained the risk of heart inflammation still outweighs the benefit of COVID jabs for healthy under 16s, and it’s closely monitoring data from America, France and Canada which have all chosen to routinely jab under 12s now.

Moderna’s jab has been considered safe and effective and is supposed to be rolled out in younger age groups in a comparable fashion to Pfizer’s.

The AstraZeneca vaccine isn’t being recommended for the under 40s in Britain because it has been linked to very rare blood clots.

A newspaper outlet reported that NHS England’s regional offices emailed trusts yesterday to tell them to draw up the plans.

They were told to have the plans ready by 4 pm on Friday, and be able to roll out the first doses to the age group from September 6 when schools return.

However, children shouldn’t be jabbed with what is seen as an innovative vaccine, and they should be left alone, and those responsible for pushing this are nothing more than criminals.

This is about the billions big pharma are going to make, not about health at all, and if this vaccine is such a wonder drug, why are doctors still refusing to see patients face to face?

Are these vaccines really that good for us, or are they just reducing the natural immune system’s ability to suppress unrecognised viruses and their variants, and what are the real long term consequences of these vaccines, does anyone really know?

And you just know that they will go down the age groups until eventually, they will jab babies as they’re born.

Sadly, we live in very dark times with numerous people being obedient and getting jabbed. But we do have a choice, and it has to be questioned, is this information reliable or made up to fit their narrative?

The people who made this vaccine know precisely what it does and how its long term effects are going to affect us – it’s only us that don’t know.

Failing The Homeless

Six months ago, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Robert Jenrick MP, told politicians that the Vagrancy Act, the law from 1824 that makes it a crime to sleep rough or beg in England and Wales, should be consigned to history.

It was great that the Secretary of State acknowledged that it was time to scrap the act, and abolishing the Vagrancy Act would have been a huge step towards making sure people facing homelessness weren’t driven even further from support.

However, six months on, people are still waiting, and are still being affected by the Vagrancy Act.

This is an out-of-date law and should be abolished because this 19th-century law criminalises people for rough sleeping or begging, and anyone prosecuted faces a fine of up to £1,000 and a criminal record.

Critics have said that this cruel law forces defenceless people further away from support, and people shouldn’t be penalised for being homeless.

According to the latest Ministry of Justice data, last year there were 573 Vagrancy Act prosecutions in England and Wales, the equivalent of just over 10 people a week.

The majority were for begging, with the remainder for being in an enclosed space without permission.

Crisis chief executive Jon Sparkes said the homelessness charity was encouraged by Mr Jenrick’s comments but were now disappointed that the offensive and counterproductive law remains in place, and he said that they all agree that the cruel, futile Vagrancy Act should be discarded but that it’s still being used week in, week out with devastating consequences.

He said that penalising people who already have next to nothing is pointless and just pushes people further away from support, often keeping them on the streets for longer.

Crisis campaigner Dayne Dougan was repeatedly told to move on when he was homeless as a teenager up to the age of 24.

He said that the Vagrancy Act made the police the enemy, rather than a source of help or protection and that telling people to leave town centres doesn’t make the problem go away, it just makes it more serious, and that we need to get rid of this antiquated law now so that it will make the lives of homeless people just a little bit better.

Nickie Aiken, Conservative MP for the Cities of London and Westminster, said a far better option to the Vagrancy Act is to address why people are on the street in the first place.

However, campaigners expressed disappointment after the government eliminated the withdrawal of the 19th century Vagrancy Act from the Queen’s Speech, despite saying it should be consigned to history, and Boris Johnson’s wide-ranging legislative agenda for the new parliament made no mention to the Vagrancy Act, leading to accusations his government was failing the homeless.

It comes amid concerns the act, introduced to target destitute soldiers sleeping on the streets and which includes references to carts and wagons, has been used by police officers to criminalise homeless people during the COVID 19 pandemic.

And a newspaper outlet reported how forces in England and Wales made 361 charges that led to court hearings between April and September last year using two sections of the Act that relate to begging and rough sleeping, and a letter was signed by over 60 parliamentarians, including the Bishop of Manchester, and MPs and peers from five parties, urging Robert Jenrick to include abolishing the law, saying that a failure to ensure the scrapping of the act would deal a blow to cross-party efforts to address the homelessness crisis.

Pfizer CEO Says A Vaccine-Resistant Strain Of COVID Is Likely To Emerge

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said on Tuesday that he believes it’s possible that a strain of COVID 19 could surface that’s resistant to vaccines.

However, the pharmaceuticals boss maintained that the company would be able to develop a new shot to tackle a vaccine-resistant strain within 95 days of its appearance.

Albert Bourla said that every time that a variant arises in the world, their scientists are getting their hands around it and that they’re investigating to see if this variant can escape the protection of their vaccine.

He said that they haven’t identified any yet, but they believe that one day, one of them may emerge, and he added that they have developed a process that inside 95 days from the day that they identify a variant as a variant of concern, they will be able to have a vaccine tailor-made against this variant.

In July, Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, cautioned that the coronavirus could mutate and possibly evade vaccines soon.

So-called breakthrough infections amongst people who’ve had Pfizer’s vaccine, as well as shots from Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, have occurred, although they seldom result in severe illness.

However, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada told a newspaper outlet that it was doubtful that the coronavirus could mutate into a vaccine-resistant strain.

Angela Rasmussen said that it would need so many mutations in the spike protein that this virus wouldn’t work anymore.

Other experts recently blasted a fear-mongering article warning of a doomsday COVID 19 variant which could be more dangerous than Delta.

The doctors emphasised the effectiveness of the jab against the virus and noted that vaccine makers could quickly adjust formulas to make vaccines more effective against variants.

Their comments came in response to an article in Newsweek Magazine which maintained that the Delta variant has destroyed confidence that vaccines would help the pandemic wind down.

The article read that the odds were not high that they would see such a triple threat, but experts couldn’t rule it out.

The Newsweek Magazine article seems to draw several conclusions, including that the pandemic will continue to get more serious and may stick around forevermore while continuing to mutate.

Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist warned that the next variant could be Delta on steroids.

These vaccines don’t offer immunity, they offer dependence, and a very good cash cow game plan, dependent on them for life means unlimited money for pharmaceutical companies.

Of course, no vaccine offers 100 per cent immunity against future strains, and some vaccines such as the flu vaccine are updated yearly to fight newly emerged strains but welcome to pharma drugs because curing people doesn’t make money, but keeping them on the pill or vaccine treadmill does, and big pharma is almost like a legal drug cartel.

There have been many people that have become pretty unwell after having the COVID vaccine, but there have been many people who had no side effects at all – ‘Just because something comes in a syringe, doesn’t mean it’s a vaccine.’

And to put the figures into perspective, there are 7.888 billion people on the planet, and only 4.4 million have died, but that number has been massively inflated, so no one really knows how many have died because there are numerous countries that don’t collect proper data.

Soon they’ll have a shot for every variant going, the Lambada variant and soon to appear will be the Shama-lama ding dong variant, so line up schmucks and roll up your sleeves.

Hollywood Director Spike Lee Admits He Believes In 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

Hollywood film-maker Spike Lee said he believes in 9/11 conspiracy theories, including the claim that one building in the World Trade Centre was brought down by controlled demolition and not a terror attack.

In a recent interview with the New York Times, Spike Lee discussed his new eight-hour documentary series ‘New York Epicentres: 9/11 – 2021 1/2.’

The four-part instalment, which first premiered on HBO on Sunday, centred primarily on New Yorkers and their responses to the 9/11 terror attacks and the COVID pandemic.

It includes interviews with New York politicians like Senator Chuck Schumer and Mayor Bill de Blasio, along with various health care workers, firefighters and activists.

He said the New York Police Department refused to be interviewed in his documentary due to his views on police, and the last episode also includes several members of the conspiracy group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group that suggested the United States government was involved with the destruction of the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001.

When Times reporter Reggie Ugwu asked Spike Lee about the group’s inclusion in the documentary series, Lee responded that he has questions and that he hoped that perhaps the legacy of this documentary is that Congress holds a hearing, a congressional hearing, about 9/11.

Reggie Ugwu then asked Lee if he believes the official explanations for the World Trade Centre collapse on September 11, to which Lee maintained that the amount of heat that it takes to make steel melt, that temperature isn’t reached, and then the juxtaposition of the way Building 7 fell to the ground when you put it next to other building collapses that were demolitions, it’s like you’re looking at the same thing.

He said that people are going to make up their own minds, but that his approach was to put the information in the movie and let people choose for themselves, and that he respected the intelligence of the audience.

The original WTC 7 was a 42 story building erected in 1987, which was recorded plunging to the ground after the Twin Towers fell.

Some angles showed the seemingly undamaged tower collapse onto its own footprint sparked, which controlled demolition claims, but footage from the other side of the building shows a tremendous gash caused by falling rubble.

And of course, we did see planes hit the towers, they weren’t invisible, or a figment of our imagination, but of course, building 7 was the biggest clue, that came down like a pack of cards, and nothing crashed into that building.

But going back to the invisible and the figment of our imagination, well, I kid you not, there’s a 3-D Holographic Display, Touchable Holograms, Ultra-Sonic sound, but is Blue Beam really possible?

It’s not just about software, it’s not just about technology. It’s about people and making information accessible to everyone, everywhere.

Everyone is excited about technology, but Blue Beam is a holographic reality. A holographic manipulation of light from various sources to create a highly realistic, three-dimensional image of a person or object that’s not actually present.

But for years now, conspiracy theorists have considered the possibility of the powers that be, launching some kind of light show in the sky, using extremely advanced holographic projections, to deceive the masses.

The 3D hologram is a realistic image that can be viewed over a broad field of view, and now some conspiracy theorists are saying that 9/11 was all a fake, that there were no planes and that it was all a hologram, and honestly folks, you really couldn’t tell the difference, and that the reason for it was to generate fear and get support for a few illegal wars.

The reports also read that the men piloting these planes had only a few lessons, and I would think it would be difficult to navigate an aircraft directly into two buildings with accuracy after a couple of lessons unless of course, they were just incredibly lucky.

Of course, people never really expect their government to lie to them but they do it all the time, particularly when it comes to people’s freedoms, and the official narrative has never satisfied a lot of people’s suspicions of what really happened that day.

People will never forget what transpired on that day.

People saw it, but perhaps they didn’t and holograms and controlled demolition caused it, on the other hand, will we ever get to the bottom of it?

It would be damn disrespectful to the people who died if we did forget about it, but then perhaps that’s what the government are banking on, and theories used to make me chuckle at one point, but after what governments and its agencies do, it now makes you question things because anything in this day and age of technology is possible.

And if you think that it’s impossible that the American government would stage something like 9/11, then just look at Operation Northwoods.

Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against American citizens that started within the US Department of Defence (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the United States government in 1962.

The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other US government operatives to both stage and commit acts of terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba.

The possibilities mentioned in the document included the possible assassination of Cuban immigrants, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high sea, hijacking planes to be shot down or given the appearance of being shot down, blowing up a US ship, and orchestrating violent terrorism in US municipalities.

But the sheep probably won’t believe that either. They’ll just say it’s another conspiracy theory.

The fact is, there are too many unanswered questions still out there, and psychologically it’s far too stressful to acknowledge that perhaps the government and leaders might have brought down those towers, assassinated JFK and planned the whole COVID debacle, although there is some compelling evidence every direction that we turn – finally, it’s too dark to face, and sometimes ignorance is bliss.

WHAT THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY AND HOUSING LOOKS LIKE AFTER CORONAVIRUS

To all my readers out there. I penned an article last week and to my alarm, as I now understand it, the article was inaccurate. I apologise for this unfortunate blunder and have since been provided with the correct information.

Sheryl Chavez is a lady who has an extremely disabled baby son called Alister.

She had been residing in her home for 8 years in Edenton, North Carolina, which she rented. However, her lease was terminated, and COVID 19 had created a significant housing crisis in her neighbourhood, and there was an unexpected flood of people buying up every available home, which caused the housing market to explode.

Sheryl Chavez received her notice on July 24th.

Her landlord had decided to cash in on this red-hot housing market, and so did every landlord for an hours drive, and every rental property in the city has been vacated and is up for sale.

People from all over the city have been evicted and their houses sold.

There are 300 homes for sale in a city of 4,000, and one for rent, which was recently sold is now up for rent again – a one bedroom which used to rent for $450 a month, is now up for rent for $825 a month.

This is the long and short of it, and this major housing crisis has made renting impossible, and there are no homes for over an hour away, and the available ones are at a far higher cost due to the severe housing deficit.

What makes this situation more serious is that Sheryl Chavez who was a Correctional Sergeant for a men’s maximum-security prison, got injured while on duty, and fired while on workers compensation, but was refused her pension because of a technicality. The technicality was because she’d only worked for 4 and a half years and she needed to work 5 years, so was denied her pension.

Therefore Sheryl Chavez was put on extended person illness, and not workers compensation, and she was forced to fight for federal disability which is still ongoing.

Sheryl Chavez has a seriously disabled baby boy, who was born with severe nervous system damage supposedly due to a medication she was on, however, I will come back to that at a later date.

This lady is now going to be homeless very shortly with a seriously disabled baby, and there’s absolutely nothing she can do about it, and will ultimately be living in her car with her disabled son, and the state doesn’t appear to want to assist her in any way.

This is a lady that never paid her rent late in the 8 years that she lived in her home, but her landlord Thelma Halsey decided that she was going to evict Sheryl and her son Alister because she wanted to sell the property, and now she can’t afford to rent anywhere else because all property prices have gone up since COVID, and it seems that everyone is on the bandwagon, and doesn’t give a damn about another human being, especially an innocent child.

This woman isn’t looking for a handout, all she wants is for somewhere she can call home for her extremely disabled son, it’s not much to ask in today’s society, where we’re supposed to be more understanding and tolerant of disabled people, particularly children.

Things in America have now sunk to a new low, raising debate over who cares for these special needs children, and the US Government should be giving support to these children, but so far it doesn’t appear that there are any tangible benefits for the disability population.

Sheryl Chavez had made the property her home, for her son and herself, and any possessions that she has, she won’t be able to take with her because she will have nowhere else to put them, so she will not only lose her possessions, she will lose her memories as well – where is President Joe Biden when people need him, the person who spoke so profoundly of disabilities and the need to support them!

Joe Biden said that he believed that everyone should be treated with dignity and have a fair shot at getting ahead, well, Sheryl Chavez isn’t being treated with dignity nor is her son Alister, and so far, I’ve not seen anyone from the Government helping them getting ahead.

What I have seen is people blowing smoke out of their posterior, seen to be doing things to help, but not doing anything at all!

Migrants Celebrate As They Arrive On Broadstairs Beach In Kent

This is the moment a group of migrants celebrated as they landed on Broadstairs beach in Kent in the presence of shocked sunbathers.

The group of 20 people, including three children and a baby, had made the dangerous 30-mile journey across the English Channel on a dinghy.

Their sudden appearance startled beachgoers in Broadstairs on the northeast Kent coastline, a further 10 miles from the usual boat landings on the south stretch of the country from Calais.

Sally Jones Rowell and her daughter Lydia Jones, 13, were at their beach hut when they saw them arrive, one man putting his arms in the air, with the kind-hearted teen giving them crisps and beverages.

The group climbed up steps onto the promenade on Saturday afternoon.

The baby was only a few months old and one of the children were about three years old.

Sally Jones Rowell said that they were at their beach hut in Stone Bay when a boat of migrants came up on the beach. She said it was essentially young men and a pretty expensive boat, with several young children.

She said that most of them moved off in every direction, and they gave the children packs of crisps.

A Kent Police spokesperson said that Kent Police officers helped Border Force after a report of suspected transients in Stone Bay, Broadstairs, at 1.50 pm.

It comes after it was established that more migrants crossed the Channel on Saturday than on any previous single day, amid claims France has lost control of their border.

A record-breaking 828 people had to be rescued or intercepted making the perilous crossing in 30 vessels.

The Home Office eventually confirmed the figures on Monday evening, some two days after the influx of immigrants.

Saturday’s figure smashed the previous daily record of 592 arrivals set on August 12, and it also makes it the busiest weekend of migrant crossings ever, exceeding the 571 who landed on July 10 and 11.

It’s the fifth time this year the figure has been higher than 2020’s record day of 416 migrants.

On August 12, 592 migrants landed in 16 boats, 475 in 15 boats on August 5, 482 in 21 boats the day before (August 4) and 430 appeared in 17 boats on July 19.

More than 12,000 transients have now crossed the Dover Strait, one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, by vessel this year.

So far, 12,427 have arrived in 2021 compared to the previous record of 8,410 in 2020.

Sadly, we are only a small island and we just don’t have the room for all these migrants.

The French need to stop this, but they don’t appear to have control of their borders, and it seems that nothing is being done to stop these migrants from arriving on our beaches and demanding five-star hotels to stay in.

It’s hard enough for UK citizens to apply for benefits that they’re entitled to, yet these transients are coming over and manage to instantly get aid and benefits that they’ve never worked for or contributed to.

And Boris Johnson doesn’t seem to have any intention of stopping this, and it seems that our no 1 enemy is our very own government.

I don’t know what the answer is because no one in parliament, whether it’s the Conservatives, Labour, LibDem or Greens gives a damn about this country, its way of life, culture or traditions, but sadly this is what happens when a bunch of brainless gullible sheep vote.

People are already suffering because there aren’t enough services, the NHS is overwhelmed, and social care is none existent, yet we’re still taking in these migrants with no skills and no right to be here and giving them everything we don’t give our own citizens.

Britain Loses Patience With Sleepy Joe

Tony Blair has blasted US President Joe Biden’s asinine decision to remove American troops from Taliban controlled Afghanistan, calling the scuttle tragic, dangerous and unnecessary and claiming the move had every Jihadist group around the world cheering.

Tony Blair, who was in Downing Street when London sent British troops into the Middle Eastern country 20 years ago following the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington, said Britain has a moral responsibility to stay until all those who need to be are evacuated.

In a 2,700 article on the threat of radical Islam, the former British prime minister said the exits weren’t in the West or Afghanistan’s interest as he lamented the likely reversal of gains made during the occupation, with the Taliban reasserting itself across most of the country in recent days.

Tony Blair issued a stiff warning to Boris Johnson that the manner of the US’ handling of the exit of the United Kingdom could be relegated from the top division of international powers, with reports Britain was chiefly kept in the dark about when American armed forces would leave.

Relations between Britain and the US are strained, with Defence Secretary Ben Wallace warning no country will be able to get everyone out of Afghanistan as Joe Biden’s August 31 date makes the mission even more time-pressured, in what is expected to be regarded as a plea to Washington.

Cabinet insiders have suggested the President was gaga and doolally for withdrawing so swiftly, while the Prime Minister has supposedly privately referred to Joe Biden as Sleepy Joe, the nickname coined by Donald Trump. Boris Johnson also allegedly remarked Britain would be better off with Donald Trump, allegations branded categorically incorrect by Downing Street.

Tony Blair also claimed that Russia, China and Iran will see and take advantage, and anyone given assurances by Western leaders would understandably view them as unstable currency.

Both the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab have suggested that Britain will now have to turn to Beijing and Moscow to assist with exercising a moderating influence over the Taliban post withdrawal.

Tony Blair said that for Britain, out of Europe and suffering the end of the Afghanistan mission by their greatest ally with limited or no consultation, they have a serious reflection to do and that they don’t see it yet, but they’re at risk of relegation to the second division of global powers.

But what the hell does Tony Blair know about moral responsibilities? And is he still looking for Weapons of Mass Destruction! And who moved the rock and let him slide back out? I wish the media would stop giving this guy a platform.

And Boris Johnson allegedly said the US would have been better with Donald Trump. Well, the majority, particularly Tory voters believe the United Kingdom would have been much better off with a proper Tory Government, and half-decent cabinet, because he’s made the UK more divided, more divisive, more crime-ridden, and he’s ruined the lives and prospects of too many good decent folk.

But putting aside views on both sides, did anyone ever contemplate not going in at all? Although, it’s a tad late for that, but it was a bad judgment call, and one would expect hindsight to be an exact science, but then….

The trouble is Tony Blair and Bush didn’t consider anything, they just did as their puppet master instructed.

And it strikes me that no matter what Boris Johnson says these days, Downing Street always denies what he said, even if he didn’t say anything at all.

Also, Tony Blair branded Joe Biden as an imbecile, but as the old saying goes, it takes one to know one, and it appears that the entire world is being run by imbeciles.

San Francisco Begins Checking People For Evidence Of Full Vaccination

San Francisco became the first major metropolis in the nation to require proof of full vaccination against COVID 19 on Friday for people eating inside restaurants, working out in gyms or attending indoor concerts.

The mandate, that went into force, will require certain businesses, including restaurants and gyms to check the vaccination status of their customers.

Mayor London Breed announced the requirement more than a week ago to stem mounting COVID 19 cases, despite 80 per cent of the city’s population being vaccinated, saying she was worried the extremely contagious delta variant could disrupt the city’s economic rebound.

Officials hope by requiring evidence of vaccination, those holding off on getting one will be encouraged to go and get one.

The mandate will require all businesses with indoor dining, including restaurants, bars and theatres, to have customers show evidence of vaccination.

It’s also required in areas where heavy breathing occurs, including gyms, yoga studios, and other recreational and fitness buildings.

All large outdoor events surpassing 1,000 people will be required to get vaccination records from anyone 12 years and older.

The mandate doesn’t apply to people unsuitable for vaccines, including children under 12.

City officials said a paper card issued by the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, a photo of the CDC card, or a verified digital vaccine record will satisfy, and that evidence of vaccination issued by foreign governments was also satisfactory.

San Francisco has pushed further in its attempts to control COVID 19 by being the first city to require its workers to be vaccinated. Workers can’t opt-out of vaccination and will receive weekly coronavirus tests.

Workers have until October 13 to show they’re completely vaccinated.

It follows several robust COVID 19 measures San Francisco imposed since the start of the pandemic. The city, and its adjacent counties in the Bay Area, were the first in the nation to order residents to stay at home to reduce the spread of the coronavirus.

The majority of the 36,000 city workers said they’re vaccinated, but about 4,300 are not.

A newspaper outlet said the city sent letters recommending a 10-day suspension without pay for 20 employees in the police, fire and sheriff’s department who refused to report their vaccination status by the August 12 deadline.

In preparation for the new mandate, restaurants and bars have posted signs and added additional personnel to begin establishing evidence of vaccination.

The problem is, if people support these vaccine passports, then they’re giving the government the primary power to decide what should be injected into our bodies medically, and it’s not your choice anymore unless you want to lose your job et cetera, but when isolated from daily life and work, it becomes a necessity to collaborate with the government’s decisions on what injections you need.

But why has the government determined that people need to get a vaccine that doesn’t keep them from getting COVID, or spreading it to someone else, and why is it so important to disparage others who wish to make an informed decision for themselves?

Perhaps they should check vaccination status when criminals come into stores, intent on stealing merchandise – it’s looking more like US Nazism is starting in San Francisco, while people line up to have their documents checked like good little sheep.

People’s rights are being stripped from them over a virus that has a 99.98 per cent survival rate, as they step over the homeless, human faeces, drugs, syringes and vomit and other refuse to get inside restaurants and bars, while all thinking that they’re free – and nothing looks more dystopian than that thought.

Britons Should Be Encouraged To Build Their Own Homes

According to a report commissioned by the Prime Minister, the housing crisis should be tackled by encouraging Britons to build their own homes.

It warns that the country risks becoming two nations, with the young unable to get on the housing ladder while those in mid-life add to their buy to let portfolio.

The report’s author, Tory MP Richard Bacon, said the solution was to build as many as 40,000 self-commissioned homes a year.

This would overcome the housing deficit, while the improvement in design criteria would make it less likely locals would object to new homes nearby.

Richard Bacon said that they need to build more and better homes and that custom and self-build could better achieve this, by putting customers and their choices back at the heart of the process.

He said that when customers come first, they would see more homes built that are better designed, better built and greener, which cost less to run, and that would be cordially welcomed by their communities, and that the review sets out a road map for how they can accomplish this much-needed change.

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick welcomed the report, and he said that as they build back better they want to help more people build their own home, making it an opportunity for thousands who’ve not considered it or ruled it out before.

And he said that this would help more people get onto the housing ladder, and ensure that homes accommodate people’s requirements while providing a significant boost to small builders and businesses.

Mr Bacon’s reviews said what’s known as the Custom and Self Build sector could deliver between 30,000 and 40,000 more homes every year, and that many could be built in weeks and are better designed, built to the highest environmental standards and could lead to cheaper household bills.

The Government wants to make home building a mainstream, realistic and affordable opportunity for people across the country, and ministers have now committed £150 million for the Help to Build scheme which will enable home builders to borrow money with lower deposits.

Mr Bacon said England was in danger of becoming two nations, one in which an entire generation struggles to find somewhere to live, while the other adds to its buy to let portfolio, and he called for muscular state action by establishing a Custom and Self Build Delivery Unit within the Government’s Homes England body to make plots of land with planning permission available everywhere.

For goodness sake, there’s a housing crisis. Have the government not realised this yet, and this idea might be great, but of course, they will all go to the immigrant crisis – they won’t struggle, but those who were born here in the United Kingdom, will be the ones that will suffer.

What we need to do is to be far more stringent with the limit of immigration, wherever they’re hailing from because the truth is that we’re building over our small island at a genuinely worrying ever-accelerating rate.

Over 50 per cent of the country is now spoiled by industry, pollutants and infrastructure et cetera, not forgetting the noise pollution associated with such. Then compare that to a figure of about just 25 per cent back in the 1960s.

If we continue to build from now until forever, inevitably there will come a point when the majority of, if not all, our children will never know the pleasures of experiencing nature or the countryside.

And of course, quality of life is very important indeed with regards to the basic well being of a population and equally essential to the very fabric of a harmonious and healthy nation, of which, nature, meaning genuinely unspoilt, healthy countryside, is one of the most important factors of all.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started