SAGE Experts Call For June 21 Freedom Day To Be Postponed

SAGE advisers have asked for June 21 Freedom Day to be suspended for several weeks amid growing cases of the Indian variant.

Professor Susan Michie, who sits on the SPI-B subgroup, sounded the alarm, warning Britain was perched on a knife-edge because infections had risen 40 per cent in only seven days, jeopardising plans to abandon all social distancing.

She told Sky News that either it could run away as it did before Christmas, which would be extremely dangerous and we’d have more restrictions, or it could be contained.

Cambridge microbiologist Professor Ravi Gupta echoed her calls, urging ministers to delay plans to ditch the last burdensome restrictions by several weeks.

The scientist, who sits on the powerful NERVTAG committee, said cases, which broke through 4,000 on Friday for the first time in nearly two months, could become pretty dangerous over the next few months.

He added high vaccine coverage meant the third wave would possibly take longer to spiral out of control than earlier waves, but he described this as a false sense of security, saying it was inevitable hospitalisations and mortality rates would eventually start to escalate.

Environment Secretary George Eustice said the Government couldn’t rule anything out, when asked if June 21 Freedom Day could be pushed back, and vaccine Minister Nadhim Zahawi revealed a stay was possible.

Boris Johnson’s roadmap is set to see the remaining restrictions, including burdensome face masks and social distancing relaxed on June 21 Freedom Day, but Government experts have hinted the possibility of this going ahead now is 50-50 because of growing case numbers.

Ministers are not set to make a definitive decision on whether to go forward with the last stage until June 14, but reports suggest contingency plans for a delay are now being prepared.

The Prime Minister has repeatedly pledged he will be driven by data, not dates, and said his easing roadmaps will be irreversible.

Some 39.2 million Britons have received at least one shot of the COVID vaccine, the Department of Health said, or more than three in five adults, and Government sources say they’re on track to offer a second dose to all over 50s by June 21.

Professor Gupta asked for lockdown easings to be delayed while speaking in a personal capacity on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, and he stated that he believed the problem was that we were not too far from reaching the kind of levels of vaccination that would help contain the virus.

However, is that because the experts are just concerned that they won’t be in the news anymore and that they will end up being irrelevant? And this sort of power that the Government has found and used must be intoxicating, and the inebriated aren’t likely to give up very easily.

And is there an Indian variant at all because every time we’re about to have some freedom, the Government and its experts seem to come up with another variant, so is there really an Indian variant, or are we being deceived big time by the globalists?

We need for this lockdown to end, not just for our freedom but because people would like to see a doctor or a dentist face to face, and not a quickie over the telephone. After all, we’ve paid into a system all our lives for that, and we’re not getting what we paid for.

And if these vaccines are giving people a false sense of security, then what’s the purpose of having a vaccine? It’s just called the process of twisting the knife slowly.

Queen’s Cousin The Duke Of Kent Will Step In As Her Plus One

A news outlet announced that the Queen will have a plus one for her official birthday parade in Windsor next month as the Royal Family continues to rally around the bereaved Ruler.

Her Majesty cut a lonely figure last year at a scaled-back ceremony, also known as Trooping the Colour, in the Quadrangle of Windsor Castle.

The pandemic meant it was shifted from its normal venue at Horse Guards Parade in London.

She also touched the hearts of the country when coronavirus rules meant she had to sit alone at the funeral of her husband, Prince Philip, in April.

However, for this year’s Trooping the Colour on June 12, the Queen will be accompanied by her cousin, the Duke of Kent. He was with her at the 2013 ceremony when Prince Philip was recuperating from surgery.

Palace sources say that after the restrictions imposed by the pandemic and a period of mourning for the Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen will be increasing her personal engagements.

As well as Trooping the Colour, which will feature more military personnel than last year, she will meet US President Joe Biden when he visits next month for the G7 summit of leading industrial nations.

While plans are still to be finalised, it’s thought the Queen, 95, will travel to Cornwall, where the summit is being held, so she can also meet the presidents and prime ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan.

As part of a plan to impress the world leaders, it’s expected that the Monarch will be accompanied by Prince Charles, the Duchess of Cornwall and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.

Charles, an eager environmentalist, has told aides he’s keen to meet Joe Biden, who in February reversed the decision by his predecessor Donald Trump to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, a legally binding international agreement to tackle climate change.

Having senior Royals travel to Cornwall for the summit, held at Carbis Bay between June 11 and 13, would circumvent the difficulties of arranging a state visit for Joe Biden in London under any COVID 19 restrictions.

It’s thought the President will be invited for a full state visit at a later date.

He will be the 14th US leader to meet the Queen, and since 1951, she’s met every occupant of the White House aside from Lyndon B Johnson, and it appears that the Kent family have always been a pillar of support to the Queen – Edward, Alexandra, Michael and their spouses, although they’ve not been deemed newsworthy for some time now due to the fact they’re no longer young and glamorous, but they’re still out there.

And her cousin will make a great plus one, and I dare say she’s got a variety of plus ones to choose from, and of course, she’s not attempting to replace the Duke, it’s just part of the grieving process, and after losing her husband, she needs this kind of support, and the Duke of Kent will be a fitting and suitable surrogate.

It also takes the pressure off Charles as the heir apparent, and also give the Queen the space to continue her reign supported by her cousin who has an incredible military history, which should satisfy everyone.

And also he’s closer to her own age, and standing in for Philip is a pretty serious business being brought out of mothballs to officiate with the Queen, although he does look pretty serious – at least Prince Philip had a fun side to him.

Boris Johnson And Carrie Symonds Stare Into Each Other’s Eyes

Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds gaze into each other’s eyes in the first photo released of their wedding day.

The delightful photograph taken in the Downing Street garden was issued after No 10 eventually verified that the Prime Minister and his new bride tied the knot in a meagre ceremony at Westminster Cathedral yesterday afternoon, with a bigger celebration planned for next summer.

The ceremony was conducted under the umbrella of a remarkable cloak and dagger operation, which aides spending hours declining to comment on the Catholic service before it was reported by a news outlet.

The image shows Carrie Symonds wearing a flowing white lace dress and a garland of white flowers in her hair as she gazed adoringly at her new husband in the sunlit garden.

Boris Johnson was in a sharp dark suit and appeared to have brushed his wayward hair for the occasion, although his tie was slightly crooked.

Despite the evasion, ministers, Tory MPs and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer have been sincerely congratulating the premier on his nuptials.

A Downing Street spokesperson said that the Prime Minister and Carrie Symonds were in a small service at Westminster Cathedral and that the pair would celebrate their union with family and friends next summer.

Boris Johnson, 56, exchanged vows with Carrie Symonds, 33, in Westminster Cathedral in the presence of a few close friends and family, becoming the first Prime Minister to marry in office since Lord Liverpool married Mary Chester in 1822.

It comes just six days after the couple, who became engaged on the Caribbean Island of Mustique in December 2019 and have baby Wilfred, aged one, sent out save the date cards to guests telling them to keep Saturday, July 30, 2022, free for a marriage ceremony.

Despite sending out the cards, the couple is understood to have been covertly planning the small service for six months, with questions about whether the save the date cards were used to help throw people off the scent.

Under the prevailing COVID rules there’s a limit to 30 guests at weddings, although the cap is supposed to be lifted on June 21st, which is freedom day when most restrictions are set to be lifted.

With Boris Johnson pegged to be back at work next week, it seems doubtful the pair, who will make their debut appearance as husband and wife at the G7 summit in June, will have a honeymoon.

This of course is excellent news for the couple, but now let’s get back to pressing issues like getting the country opened up and back to normal again, although them getting married in secret was a smart thing to do, and now they can have a much bigger celebration with their friends and family next year, and perhaps Carrie Symonds is the sort of strong woman Boris needs, and hopefully they’ll be happy together and married life for Boris Johnson won’t be so boring.

Sadly, a lot of people don’t actually care what Boris Johnson does privately because many of those people have small businesses and all they care about is feeding their families and surviving, but perhaps that’s something that Boris Johnson doesn’t understand?

I’m guessing that Dominic Cummings didn’t make up the number of guests on the list. Perhaps that’s the reason it was done in secret, just in case he burst through the doors screaming: ‘It should have been me!’

Netflix Series The Crown Will Highlight Martin Bashir’s Bombshell Interview With Diana

It’s been claimed that the Netflix series The Crown will highlight Martin Bashir’s interview with Diana despite Prince William’s calls for it never to be aired again.

Reports suggest that the next instalment of the popular series will include the BBC reporter’s dishonest and deceitful 1995 Panorama interview across two episodes.

A source close to the show, which is penned by British playwright Peter Morgan, told a news outlet that the scripts were already out there after being written last year.

They added that the team were doing the most incredible research and they’ve got it all in there – the build-up to the interview, how Martin Bashir effectively groomed Diana, the interview itself, and the aftermath were all factored in over more than one episode.

Reacting to findings of Lord Dyson’s report, which concluded Martin Bashir was in the wrong, and Prince William said the interview now held no legitimacy, had established a false narrative for 25 years, and the BBC’s shortcomings had let his mother, his family and the public down.

A senior royal source told the news outlet that if there were any plans to continue to commercialise and exploit this, not just by the BBC but by any other outlets, forthcoming episodes of The Crown, or whoever it might be, that would be of deep concern to him.

The Duke of Cambridge read his bombshell statement to the camera in a courtyard at Kensington Palace, his London home and the home of his late mother.

Appearing on a Panorama special about the scandal, the princess’s brother Earl Spencer linked his sister’s death to the BBC and the crisis of trust he claimed overwhelmed her after she was deceived by Martin Bashir.

His devastating verdict came as a judge ruled the disgraced journalist deceived the princess with an elaborate fiction that painted some of those closest to her as traitors.

The rogue reporter commissioned bogus bank statements to secure his interview with Princess Diana but cloaked up his cunning behaviour in a shocking stain on the BBC’s near 100-year history.

Martin Bashir is still being paid his estimated £100,000 a year salary by the BBC, its Director-General admitted, as he promised to publish a report into how he was hired again.

The journalist, 58, slated for how he deceived Princess Diana into giving her Panorama interview 25 years ago, was not dismissed despite details of his wrongdoing being widely reported.

However, Diana chose to answer the questions that Martin Bashir asked her. No one put a gun to her head.

Yes, there might have been dishonest methods used around securing the interview, but at the time she still had a team around her who were paid to sort this kind of stuff out, and once Diana chose the words she said, then there was no issue.

She’d been extensively media prepared, she was trained in diplomacy, articulation, and she knew how to play the game, but chose not to.

Yet most people still believe in the monarchy and some even worship them – a family that probably wouldn’t even spit on you if you were on fire! And Diana clearly didn’t think much of the Royal Family, and there’s a majority out there that still don’t.

And the series The Crown is great, so long as you don’t read too much into it, although the interview did happen, and in context, everything was considered real back in 1995, and it doesn’t matter what’s been reported now, and it’s not like they’re fabricating an interview that never took place.

Remains Of 215 Children As Young As Three Are Discovered

The remains of 215 children, some as young as three years old, were discovered at the site of a former residential school for indigenous children, a discovery Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called tragic on Friday.

According to the Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc Nation, which said the remains were discovered with the help of a ground-penetrating radar specialist, children were students at the Kamloops Indian Residential School in British Columbia that closed in 1978.

Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc Chief Rosanne Casimir said in a statement that they had a knowing in their community that they were able to verify, but that at this time, they have more questions than answers.

And a six-year inquiry into the now-defunct system discovered in 2015 that the residential school system, which effectively separated indigenous children from their families, constituted cultural genocide.

The report documented horrific physical injury, abuse, starvation and other crimes suffered by many of the 150,000 children who attended the schools, typically run by Christian churches on behalf of Ottawa from the 1840s to the 1990s, and it found more than 4,100 children perished while attending residential school.

The deaths of the 215 children buried in the grounds of what was once Canada’s most populous residential schools are believed to not have been included in that figure and seem to have been undocumented until the discovery.

Trudeau wrote in a tweet that the news broke his heart and that it was a sharp reminder of that obscure and shocking chapter in their country’s antiquity.

In 2008, the Canadian government formally atoned for the system, and the Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc Nation said it was engaging with the coroner and reaching out to the home communities whose children attended the school. They expect to have preliminary findings by mid-June.

In a statement, British Columbia Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Terry Teegee called finding such gravesites urgent work that refreshes the sadness and loss for all First Nations in British Columbia.

This is utterly repugnant and shocking and the treatment of these poor children is utterly barbaric, and this is because everyone thought that churches and priests, no matter what denomination were past reproach, and because colonialism forced Christianity and conformity onto the locals and if they didn’t obey they were slaughtered.

And I’m guessing that not everything has been reported and it’s far worse than people understand, and the victims were helpless children, which is incredibly sick, sad and disturbing.

Sadly this has been occurring all around the world over the centuries, with the removal of children from their families to erase the indigenous culture, and now we should be teaching the horrors of the empire in schools, but of course, there are vested interests who want it whitewashed from history, and it appears that the human race is truly despicable, and what a terribly short life these children lived, having been taken from their families and culture, and no amount of money will mend their broken culture.

But once again this is a discovery of the evil done to children in the name of God, and it just proves how society judges and treats people they think of as being substandard in some way, and this is disgusting behaviour that’s being repeated to this day in a way some people are treated and scorned by others, and it’s unsettling to try to understand how adults could treat small vulnerable children with such cruelty.

The Letter Carrie Symonds Wanted To Send To The Times

Boris Johnson refused to back fiancee Carrie Symonds’ complaint to The Times after it claimed the pair wanted to get rid of their pet pooch Dilyn.

He objected because the proposed complaint, drawn up at the start of the COVID crisis, was ‘a nonsense.’

A copy of the draft letter was leaked to the Daily Mail’s Simon Walters after Dominic Cummings told MPs on Wednesday that Carrie Symonds went crackers over a report claiming the couple hated Dilyn.

Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser Dominic Cummings said Carrie Symonds response had averted the Prime Minister’s attention at a critical stage ahead of the first lockdown.

He was also dealing with a demand by Donald Trump for Britain to back bombing raids in the Middle East.

The leaked letter reveals that Carrie Symonds wanted Boris Johnson to support her formal protest that Jack Russell cross Dilyn was not chronically ill and there were no plans to callously rehome him.

The draft letter, in both their names, was prepared after Carrie Symonds was angered by an editorial in The Times on March 11 last year.

It was addressed to The Times and in it, the pair threatened to take their grievance to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO).

The article said Dilyn could be put up for adoption because the pair were fed up with trying to house train the sick animal.

Carrie Symonds denounced the story as total crap on social media, and when The Times declined to print an apology, she urged Boris Johnson to write to it, but after reportedly telling Carrie Symonds he would send the letter, Boris Johnson changed his mind after Dominic Cummings intervened, according to well-placed sources.

An insider said that the Prime Minister went along with it initially because Carrie Symonds was cross and that it was none of Dominic Cummings business but he disliked Carrie and went berserk.

He told the Prime Minister it was a waste of time, and the Prime Minister agreed. He sympathised with Carrie’s feelings but said that he couldn’t sign it because it was nonsense.

Boris Johnson’s decision to not complain came after Dominic Cummings was told he couldn’t attend a COVID meeting because he was dealing with the Dilyn row.

Eight months later, Dominic Cummings was removed from his No 10 post when he lost a power struggle with Carrie Symonds.

Perhaps she’s up there with Meghan Markle in terms of delusion, and poor Dilyn, having to live with such awful people, someone should save him.

But really, who’s interested in a letter about a dog? And it appears that Carrie Symonds is a manipulative drama queen, and Boris Johnson has been rather slow getting round to marrying her, and this gets to be more like a soap opera every day.

And maybe we should be worried for Dilyn – perhaps he should get himself a lawyer, of course, he would have to work pro- bone-o!

NYC’s Billionaire’s Row Gets New Neighbours

A homeless shelter is to be created on one of New York City’s most expensive streets, after a legal battle to stop its opening ended in defeat.

A New York state appeals court on Thursday rejected the concerns voiced by an alliance of residents and businesses from the Manhattan neighbourhood by Central Park, nicknamed Billionaire’s Row.

Billionaire’s Row isn’t one street or officially defined.

Real estate agents describe it as an area south of Central Park, between 57th Street and 59th Street from north to south, and extending from 8th Avenue in the west for eight blocks east to 2nd Avenue. Trump Tower is just to the south.

Bill de Blasio, mayor of New York, started an initiative called Turning the Tide, which aimed to create 90 homeless shelters across the city.

One of the chosen sites was the Park Savoy Hotel, which closed permanently in 2018.

Bill de Blasio planned to house 140 men in the hotel’s 70 suites, yet the objections were immediate.

A group calling themselves The West 58th Street Coalition sued the city in 2018, describing the building as essentially unsuitable for a homeless shelter and maintaining it as a fire risk.

The coalition wrote on a Change.org petition against it that the plan was never shared with anyone in their neighbourhood, and their input was not solicited, and they said that while they realised there was a need to shelter the city’s displaced, they believed that the Mayor’s Turning the Tide plan was very flawed.

They described de Blasio’s plan as an expensive band-aid, that didn’t come close to addressing the deficit of affordable housing.

It was said that it would cost $63 million over nine years, or $50,000 per person, and argued that the funds would be better employed on alternatives, and they argued that putting large groups of men together in shelter situations would create opportunities for conflict and crime, as opposed to an opportunity for men to have a home of their own with solitude and pride.

The lawsuit says that the shelter’s building features just one pathway to enter and exit, according to the coalition’s lawsuit, which means that in the event of a fire emergency, both first responders and residents evacuating the building would be forced to use the same staircase.

Since 1968, the city’s building code has mandated that buildings have at least two ways to enter and exit.

The city has said that compliance with prevailing codes wasn’t needed because of a grandfather clause in the city’s building regulations that would apply to the former Park Savoy Hotel.

A judge rejected the lawsuit in April 2019, noting that the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy meant the city’s Department of Buildings determines the building complied with local laws.

Such a large amount of cash is being used in the wrong place to help the displaced of NYC, and it’s a death trap as well with only one entry and exit point in the event of a fire, and the Department of Homeless Services needs to make sure that money that’s been proposed to be used on this location is better utilized to assist those in need, and perhaps it’s time for them to reconsider their plans and do so much better.

And they’re blaming the homeless, but NYC has transformed into a hell hole even before this came about.

Shelters are a hoax. They’re dangerous and they don’t solve anything. Instead, build housing for these people, or just make shared housing for destitute people that have nowhere to go because these shelters boot people out in the morning.

Then what? They beg all day long. Perhaps this mayor and all officials should spend 72 hours with someone that’s in a shelter, then they might finally do something.

The ex-Trump Official Who Was Part Of Pompeo’s Inquiry Into Wuhan Lab

A former State Department official in the Trump administration involved in investigating the origins of the coronavirus said his team found no evidence that it made its way to humans from animals.

The former State Department official David Asher told Fox News on Thursday that they were finding that despite the claims of their scientific community, including the National Institutes of Health and Dr Fauci’s NIAID organisation, there was virtually no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic evolution or source of COVID 19.

David Asher was part of the State Department’s arms control and verification bureau when his then-boss, Mike Pompeo, requested an investigation into the cause of the virus that causes COVID 19.

At the time, public health officials including Dr Anthony Fauci rejected suggestions that the coronavirus may have been man-made as a conspiracy theory, though circumstantial evidence has surfaced of a possible lab leak.

Mike Pompeo wanted to know whether the virus was created as part of China’s secret biological weapons programme.

President Joe Biden’s administration terminated Mike Pompeo’s inquiry after entering office in January. The decision arose from concern about the quality of evidence collected by Pompeo’s team.

CNN reported that the probe was met with internal opposition by those concerned it was part of a political effort by the Trump administration to blame China for the virus, and sources say that when Biden’s team was briefed on the investigation’s findings in February and March, they chose to close it down amid concerns about the legitimacy of the evidence.

Joe Biden ordered his intelligence agencies to investigate whether the coronavirus leaked from a lab after public health officials acknowledged that there was a possibility that this did happen.

Asher said that his team of investigators concentrated on the two main theories, that the virus originated in bats and was transferred to humans, or that it inadvertently leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and Asher told Fox News that the data disproportionately stacked up as they investigated that it was coming out of a lab or some unknown source, and he said the lab in Wuhan, which was known for its research on bat coronaviruses, had become a focal point for investigators.

Asher said that it was the epicentre of synthetic biology in the People’s Republic of China and that they were up to some pretty hairy stuff with synthetic biology and so-called gain of function techniques.

It’s looking more like that China did breed this virus in a lab and did control research and experiments on it, and that they owned it and then let it escape to the world while concealing the entire episode.

And if they did lie to the world and they did infect us, then China owes the world for every cost and every death, and Chinese leadership should agree, or be arrested, and payments should be owed to the world.

But of course, China doesn’t want transparency, which is an alien concept to their stringent control of everything in China, and if this was biowarfare, the question is, whose biowarfare was it?

But let’s just hope that this was an accident or natural because it could have been a test run before they unleash a dangerous and deadly virus that can’t be cured with a fast track vaccine.

And never forget this is a communist regime that’s ruthless.

The Dentist Will See You… In Three Years

A damning report reveals that dental patients are being made to wait until up to 2024 for NHS appointments.

Laying bare the extent of the crisis, watchdogs said many people were turning to private care or even pulling out their own teeth, and doing DIY fillings.

A number of surgeries have thousands on their waiting lists and others have closed their books to new patients. However, some of the same practices will offer an appointment inside a week to those who can afford to pay privately, according to research by Healthwatch England.

It found that one in three patients have felt pressured into paying for private care because of intolerable pain. Others say they’ve been driven into debt to meet dentistry bills.

The report finds that those who are unable to go private can be left waiting for up to three years to be seen, and even emergency care entails waits of up to six weeks.

The report said that the delays can lead to worsening of their dental problems and losing their teeth, and Healthwatch England claims public opinion of NHS dentistry has never been lower and highlights a twin crisis of lack of access and affordability.

The number of dental surgeries offering NHS treatment dropped from 9,661 in 2014/15 to 8,408 in 2019/20.

The British Dental Association said dentistry was the only part of the NHS operating on a lower budget than a decade ago.

Spokesperson Shawn Charlwood said that for too long meaningful reform of NHS dentistry had been repeatedly kicked down the road and that COVID has pushed a system already in crisis to breaking point, with millions left with no options.

He said that patients need to know that by this time next year ministers will have turned the page on a decade of failed contracts and underfunding and that while it should be shocking that some are waiting weeks, months or even years to access care, that was business as usual before this pandemic struck, and he said that this wasn’t just the result of lockdown but years of treating NHS dentistry as the Cinderella Service.

The Healthwatch England report highlights the case of a patient who required hospital treatment after they overdosed on painkillers they were taking to ease their dental problems.

Others have been told to use DIY filling kits or have been prescribed antibiotics with no chance of a follow-up appointment to treat the underlying problem.

Some people have been calling pretty much every dentist to try to find one that was taking on patients – they all said the same thing, that due to COVID they’ve not been provided with authorisation from the NHS to register any new patients within are having to pay privately for treatment, and this is a national disgrace.

The dentist system in the United Kingdom is chaotic at best, and it’s been allowed to become private without any consultation, and it appears that successive governments don’t want to finance dentistry properly and have pushed to private.

The Government need to sort his problem out because people are being left in pain.

If you want to see your local dentist on the NHS, it’s come back in 3 months – offer to go private and they’ll see you in 24 hours – there appears to be a certain amount of COVID profiteering going on here.

It also begs the question – what are we paying all this tax towards because the NHS clearly isn’t being used correctly, and the NHS isn’t free at the point of contact – we already pay for it in our taxes.

England’s NHS Plans To Share Patient Records With Third Parties

England’s NHS is making ready to scrap the medical records of 55 million patients, together with sensitive data related to psychological and sexual well being, prison information and the abuse of adults and youngsters, right into a database it’s going to share with third parties.

The information assortment venture, which is the primary of its kind, has triggered an uproar amongst privateness campaigners, who say it legally questionable, especially as patients only have a couple of weeks to decide out of the plan.

NHS Digital, which runs the well-being service’s IT techniques, confirmed the plan to combine collectively medical information from each affected person in England who’s registered with a GP clinic right into a single pool that can be available to educational and business third parties for analysis and planning purposes.

Cori Crider, the co-founder of Foxglove, a marketing campaign group for digital rights, said that all of us need to see the NHS come out of the pandemic stronger, however famous that the NHS has been fully silent on who would have entry to the data.

She said is it pharma corporations? The well-being arm of Google Deepmind? When you ask patients whether or not they need details of their fertility treatment or abortion or results of their colonoscopy shared with those companies, they’re not going to need to.

Foxglove has issued an approved letter to the Division of Well being and Social Care, questioning the legality of the plans underneath present information safety legal guidelines, and threatening additional authorised motion.

Rosa Curling, a solicitor at Foxglove, wrote within the letter that she had severe issues concerning the legality of the change as a consequence of no specific permission had been given and only a few segments of the general public could be conscious that the brand new processing was coming or directly affected their private medical data.

NHS patient’s GP records are the most detailed and sensitive medical records that exist, containing the history of events in an individual’s lifetime affecting their physical and mental well-being.

But, from 1 July, NHS Digital has announced that data may be shared from the GP medical records about any living patient registered at a GP practice in England when the collection began.

NHS Digital, the health and social care system’s information and technology partner, will be able to take the following from GP’s records, which will be data about diagnoses, symptoms, observations, test results, medications, allergies, immunisation, referrals, recalls and appointments, including data about physical, mental and sexual health.

This will also include data about staff who have treated patients, and data on sex, ethnicity and sexual orientation, as well as other delicate data.

Although NHS Digital states that patient’s data will be removed from GP systems across England from 1 July 2021, and its privacy notice states that individuals have until 23 June 2021 to opt-out.

And while its press release on the matter states that people can opt-out at any time, the privacy notice states that NHS Digital will nevertheless still hold the patient data which was shared with them before they registered the Type 1 opt-out, meaning that for anyone who’s not opted out by the time their GP history was first extracted, the data taken will never be deleted.

Having collected millions of patient’s GP records, their data will be distributed, including into the secret VIP lanes for GP data, and, likely, the preponderance of the population will not be conscious of any of this.

It will not know that the Government has commanded NHS Digital to instruct their GP to hand over a copy of their lifelong medical history to be sold, because the Government has taken the decision not to tell anyone.

When a similar GP data grab was attempted before, junk mail flyers were sent to homes. That programme failed.

This time, patients could and should have been written to, as millions of people have been throughout the Coronavirus pandemic.

If a member of the public did happen to find out about this programme, including the opt-out, they would be forgiven for thinking that NHS Digital would not sell their health and care data, because that’s precisely what it says on its website, including in this myth-busting fact check about social media posts.

On its website, NHS Digital states that it’s publicly funded and that they don’t work on a cost-recovery basis, and that it doesn’t charge for data, only to meet the cost of processing and delivering its service.

Although it states that there’s lots of protection in place to make sure patient data is used securely and safely, it’s not doing the safest thing, which would be to not let its customers have copies of patient’s data at all.

Like the Office for National Statistics and Genomics England, NHS Digital does now have what’s known as a safe setting, a secure data processing facility with layers of rules, approvals, protections, and monitoring. But the Government hasn’t made it mandatory for patient’s GP data to only be accessed via this highly secure, heavily audited environment, and so, in all probability, NHS Digital’s customers will continue to buy copies.

NHS Digital does audit some, but not all of its customers which receive copies of data. Several of these audits have revealed that, and not only do organisations break the protections in place, but that these don’t hinder them from getting data once they’ve been broken.

Some of these protections are legal obligations, but audits have revealed that one public body didn’t even conduct a legally required data protection impact assessment.

This recently obtained GP data will be distributed in the same way as patient’s NHS data obtained from other health and care settings already are.

After the failure of a similar data grab in 2014, NHS England undertook that any subsequent collection of GP data would be in a safe setting only. But, that promised safeguard is now entirely missing.

Some may say that there’s no point arguing with a Government that doesn’t listen and doesn’t appear to care, but people do care, and in this situation, they have options.

To fully opt-out from having your NHS data used for purposes beyond your direct care is a two-step process:

1) If you have concerns and want to stop your and your family’s GP data being taken from your GP practice for purposes other than your direct care, you can do so by filling in and giving this ‘Type 1’ form to your GP practice. (This form allows you to include details for your children and dependants as well.) This is the most urgent step; the deadline to get your form to your GP is 23rd June 2021, according to NHS Digital.

2) If you want to stop your non-GP data, such as hospital or clinic treatments, being used/sold for purposes other than your direct care (e.g. for “research and planning”) you should also do the following:

· If you are opting out just for yourself, use NHS Digital’s online National Data Opt-out process – this process only works for individuals aged 13 and over.

· If you have children under 13, you need to fill in this form and e-mail or post it back to NHS Digital – this form works for both you and your children.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started